Slashdot Mirror


Baby Monitors Killing Urban Wi-Fi

Barence writes "Baby monitors and wireless TV transmitters are responsible for slowing down Wi-Fi connections in built-up areas, according to a report commissioned by British telecoms regulator Ofcom. The research smashes the myth that overlapping Wi-Fi networks in heavily congested towns and cities are to blame for faltering connection speeds. Instead it claims that unlicensed devices operating in the 2.4GHz band are dragging down signals. 'It only requires a single device, such as an analogue video sender, to severely affect Wi-Fi services within a short range, such that a single large building or cluster of houses can experience difficulties with using a single Wi-Fi channel,' the report claims."

31 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. Baby Monitors by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Frank: A lot of people are bugging their babies these days. I guess babies can't be trusted.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    1. Re:Baby Monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry. When the monitor lizards grow up they'll eat all the wayward children.

    2. Re:Baby Monitors by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is Britain. If we don't monitor them from birth, how will they grow up to be well adjusted members of society?

    3. Re:Baby Monitors by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      omfg...after that video I think British baby monitors should have a claymore option. and i thought "a clockwork orange" was fucked up.

    4. Re:Baby Monitors by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I found a baby monitor feed broadcast where I live, I think my first reaction would be to override it with a stronger goatse/tubgirl feed.

      That should teach the parents not to put (for them) critical services on a best-effort no-guarantees must-accept-any-and-all-interference part of the radio spectrum. However, I fear that they would fail to understand.

    5. Re:Baby Monitors by GameMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Besides, if you don't monitor them you can't be sure they've eaten their meat. Think of all the children that might get pudding without having eaten their meat.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  2. Think of the children? by laffer1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're just trying to slow down the net for their parents so they'll have time to play with them!

    1. Re:Think of the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually it is the other way around using the baby monitor baby slows down the connection as a distraction so they can go and play in dog's water bowl without the parent's interference (that is what my baby is doing anyway).

  3. You know what that means... by Crashspeeder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do away with the babies, then we don't need baby monitors anymore. Voila! Better wi-fi. I'm willing to sacrifice all your babies for better wi-fi.

    1. Re:You know what that means... by tekiegreg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sarcasm aside :-p I more realistically forsee a banning of baby monitors actually happening as the 2.4ghz airspace continues to clutter, either that or baby monitors actually joining WiFi spots as I said in an earlier post below, though what did they do in the days before baby monitors? Even when my baby monitor has a failure (forgot to turn on, unplugged, dead battery, etc.), I can usually still hear my baby screaming me awake, I keep telling my wife we really don't need the monitor just to amplify the volume of said scream...

      --
      ...in bed
    2. Re:You know what that means... by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      fuck the children.

      I don't see how that's going to help...from what I hear, it's damn near impossible to get a WiFi signal in prison. Seems like kind of a step backward, really.

    3. Re:You know what that means... by frieko · · Score: 2, Funny

      If your or your neighbor's microwave causes much interference, have it checked out.

      I'm not an RF engineer, but I would imagine there's a huge decibel difference between "cooks flesh" and "interferes with milliwatt radio transmissions".

      There's plenty of licensed spectrum that you can use, just get a license.

      That's my point, I shouldn't have to make a Federal case out of it to send a radio signal 50 feet. And WiFi has proven that.

  4. I Had This Problem by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it was interrupting my raiding schedule. So I hired a hitman to take out my neighbors baby, execution style. Problem fixed itself soon after.

    I had him plant some weed on the infant to make it look like a drug deal gone bad but I was still questioned at the trial. Thank god Warcraft can't be considered a motive ... yet.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Had This Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you get your guild to testify that you were in Naxx when that shit went down? Couldn't possibly have been involved.

    2. Re:I Had This Problem by ukyoCE · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was in an instance last weekend and a guy has to go AFK because of the baby crying. Came back and said

      "Wife took over, have a newborn"

      I jokingly asked if he was still at the hospital:

      "Yep, wifi on a laptop. Baby was born 9:00 server time"

  5. OMG by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Won't someone thing of something besides the children!?

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  6. More evidence... by teflaime · · Score: 4, Funny

    that children do not belong on the internet!

  7. Urban Wi-Fi Killing Baby Monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many leave their baby monitors open and unencrypted.

    I've found many open baby monitors being leeched by a dozen on more losers. The stolen bandwidth really lagged out the pictures and caused little Johnny to stew in his own poo longer than necessary.

    And just try to get one of these leeches to do even a single changing. The second little Johhny finishes an upload the leeches scatter without the courtesy of seeding.

  8. Re:Then why isn't this happening is rural areas? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Packets in the country are friendlier and more courteous than those goldang city packets.

  9. fun with titles by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

    So which baby is it that's monitoring the killing of urban WiFi? If he/she weren't monitoring it, would it still be happening?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  10. WHAT!!!!???? WiFi KILLING BABIES!!!!???? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how rumors get started, Beavis!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:WHAT!!!!???? WiFi KILLING BABIES!!!!???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think I'm going to rig up an amplified baby-monitor as a kill-switch, and aim it at all the houses on my block that look as if they might be broadcasting the SSID of "Mittens The Kitten's Cuddly Coffee Corner"

      Thanks /. I knew there was a good reason I read you!

    2. Re:WHAT!!!!???? WiFi KILLING BABIES!!!!???? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, this is about a baby which monitors the Wi-Fi of a killer named Urban.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  11. Re:For me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think they should just get rid of usernames and make everyone an AC. Anonymity is better for discussion because it keeps the focus on the topic, not the posters' egos.

  12. Re:Then why isn't this happening is rural areas? by berashith · · Score: 2, Funny

    I took this article to mean that not enough people in the city line their living space with tin foil .

  13. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the next Cyberwar! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    "US Navy SEALs, armed with baby monitors, successfully attacked and destroyed the North Korean Iranian Al Qaida scary nuclear weapons plant, by disrupting their communications command and control systems . . . by using the baby monitors."

    "A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment that a Defense Department Special Warfare Squad was being trained exclusively with RC toy equipment obtained from 'Toys R Us.'"

    "Although an anonymous comment from a person familiar with the situation, stated 'That truck that can flip over is real cool.'"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  14. Re:I see it red by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would have got first post if it wasn't for those goddamn BREEDERS and their filthy RUGRATS JAMMING my wifi.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  15. Re:For me... by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're very clever, young man, but it's noises all the way down.

  16. Baby crying by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I found a baby monitor feed broadcast where I live, I think my first reaction would be to override it with a stronger goatse/tubgirl feed.

    Forget that, just override the audio with prerecorded sounds of a baby crying. Send that 4 times a night at random times and I'm sure it won't be very long before you don't have to worry about any interference.

    1. Re:Baby crying by iphayd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Umm, those of you without children probably think that a cry is some generic thing. It's not. I can tell my daughter's cry from other babies, and putting some pre-recorded sounds will probably not do anything other than have me pull out a yagi and hunt your ass down.

      I'll play some pre-recorded crying to you when I find you. (after I make you cry.)

  17. Re:More PERTINENT Post... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    If there weren't a big yard between us, it would probably knock out my neighbor's WiFi too.

    Use a satellite dish to aim. Or maybe a round metal strainer would work...