Slashdot Mirror


Apple Refusing Any BitTorrent Related Apps?

jamie pointed out what appears to be an unfortunate policy for Apple's app store that is refusing anything to do with BitTorrent. The example is a remote control app that allows a user to interface with their Transmission BitTorrent client. This certainly isn't the first complaint over app store policy. Issues from the return policy to the "objectionable content" of Nine Inch Nails have some developers concerned over what Apple is doing to the market. Of course, many are quick to remind that it is Apple's store and they are free to do whatever they want with it.

54 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. Jailbreak by googlesmith123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want torrent you can always jailbreak it.

    --
    Say NO to unpaid Internships!
    1. Re:Jailbreak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the way I do it. Jailbreaking is awesome, you can install python, vlc, gcc, irc, if the package doesn't you can just create it from source, assuming that the libraries behind it work well with the iphone/touch. Honostly, the itouch has replaced my netbook needs for over 6 months now. The only thing I hate about it is how proprietary it is.

    2. Re:Jailbreak by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jailbreaking: "It may be your store, but it's my goddamn phone".

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:Jailbreak by Crashspeeder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Forget jailbreaking the iShit.... just don't buy one, problem solved. Ohhhh, you want to use the iWhateverStuff? Live with the DRM then, sucker!

      I'm not sure I agree. Sure, I've had to jump through hoops to get it to do what I want but once I do configure it, it's one of the coolest/funest things I have. I could say almost exactly the same about my linux install too.

    4. Re:Jailbreak by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      So ... you photoshop your porn before a late night wank session?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:Jailbreak by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I like to airbrush my mpegs frame by frame...the move to HD porn is killing me!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Jailbreak by LuxMaker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bricking: "It may be your phone, but it's our firmware."

      Jailbreaking: "It may be your store, but it's my goddamn phone".

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    7. Re:Jailbreak by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless if you bought an iPod touch, bought the iPhone at full price or you paid out the contract termination fee, it's not your phone until your contract is up.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    8. Re:Jailbreak by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I doubt that many of us "koolaid drinkers" are the ones complaining. In my experience, the ones who complain the most/loudest about the app store are the ones who don't even have an iPhone/iPod touch. The rest of us are quite content with the wide assortment of apps that are already available, and most of us probably don't have the need to run BitTorrent apps on our cell phones.

      Just a thought.

      This message brought to you SteveJobsBot, astroturfing Slashdot since 2005!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Jailbreak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah the phone isn't yours until it breaks outside of warranty, or you drop the damn thing. Than it quickly becomes yours while you pay a monthy.

      It's a win-win really ... as long as you are ATT.

    10. Re:Jailbreak by SJ2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Though you must admit, Apple artificially and purposely makes it harder, Linux just happens to be like that (for arguments sake)

    11. Re:Jailbreak by mea37 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although it is popular to believe that something is not "yours" until you have discharged all of the liabilities you accepted when you bought it, that is simply not the case.

      The terms of the contract include: We'll sell you a phone for $X. You'll pay us $Y if you leave before Z months is up.

      Note that the company is not obligated to accept return of the phone in lieu of an early termination penalty. (I've only had one company - DirectTV - state that they would accept their equipment back and let you off the hook if you left early.) Note who is responsible for dealing with the situation if the phone is lost, stolen, or damaged.

      You own the phone (as an AT&T employee would quickly be reminded if he tried to take it from you). The software, as always, is held in a legal grey area by various lobbying interests.

  2. Web UI by moniker127 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Isn't this what web UIs are for?


    I think ittl be a few years before people realize that bittorrent is perfectly legal, and a great distribution method.

    1. Re:Web UI by Knara · · Score: 3, Informative

      My thoughts exactly. Couldn't one just make a Safari bookmark?

    2. Re:Web UI by mindcorrosive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. At least three of the most widely used (Deluge, KTorrent and Transmission) already have web UIs. No links, this can be easily checked on their official websites. rTorrent doesn't have web interface, AFAIK.

      Apple will need to ban http to pull this off.

      --
      + 3.14 Transcendental
    3. Re:Web UI by pwfffff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is driving in and of itself perfectly legal?

      Sure.

      But what percentage of commutes do you think are non-infringing?

      And what percentage of drivers have never broken any traffic law?

  3. Apple is free to do whatever it wants... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The purpose of these stories, involving Apple refusing to sell apps, is not to debate the rights of Apple to do so. Everyone recognizes that Apple has a right to sell or not sell anything it so desires.

    The purpose of these stories is to warn people to stay away from Apple, because Apple does not have your best interests in mind, only its bottom line.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Apple is free to do whatever it wants... by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The purpose of these stories is to warn people to stay away from Apple, because Apple does not have your best interests in mind, only its bottom line.

      Or another way to put it might be that they are not trying to be everything to everyone, and while we do not necessarily know all the reasons for all of their decisions, anyone who is going to make a significant purchase ($200+ dollars plus ongoing fees) should have this information in order to make an informed decision.

      If you're going to "warn people" to stay away from Apple because they're interested in their bottom line, you're going to have to warn people to stay away from pretty much all corporations. Of course, that means not having any sort of computing device...

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Apple is free to do whatever it wants... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      The difference isn't between companies interested in their bottom line and companies not so interested(all of which are dead); but between companies whose bottom line is bolstered by controlling you and companies whose bottom line is bolstered by serving you.

    3. Re:Apple is free to do whatever it wants... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The purpose of these stories, involving Apple refusing to sell apps, is not to debate the rights of Apple to do so. Everyone recognizes that Apple has a right to sell or not sell anything it so desires.

      Since Apple has gone to some trouble to prevent you from installing apps other than through the app store, there is very much room to debate whether they have the right to refuse to sell apps. They have given themselves a monopoly on non-developer iPhone application distribution and it could be considered anticompetitive. It is for a court to decide, but there is plenty of room for discussion.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Apple is free to do whatever it wants... by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to "warn people" to stay away from Apple because they're interested in their bottom line, you're going to have to warn people to stay away from pretty much all corporations. Of course, that means not having any sort of computing device...

      Or to put it another way, if Apple are going to continnue to present themselves as the fun, shiny, easy, nice answer to everything, and both explicitly and implicitly suggest that everyone else is a bunch of crusty old business-oriented, consumer-hating corporations, then it will be totally legitimate and arguably even necessary for there to be a continued awareness campaign about the fact that they are behaving in this way.

      Maybe we need a revised iphone advertisement:

      "The great thing about the iphone is, if you want to find the nearest restaurant, there's an app for that... and if you want to use a spirit level thingo, there's an app for that... and if you want to use useful software developed by someone Apple doesn't approve of, you can go to hell... and if you want to use technology which Apple is nervous about, you can also go to hell... and if you think you actually own that phone you got when you handed over money, you are living in a fantasy world.

      The new iphone. It's whatever Apple says it is."

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  4. They'd better stop approving Safari then by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking at the Transmission control interface through Safari on my iPhone right now. I guess now that Safari might be used to facilitate "this category of application" Apple will be pulling it from the OS?

    I'm as much of a fanboy as the next guy, but Apple really need to get the house in order over the app store.

    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  5. Use wTorrent by FunkyELF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I stopped using Azureus once it disappeared from portage and I could only get Vuze. Since then I switched to rTorrent. Its awesome and command line based which means you can ssh into another machine and kick it off.
    I've been meaning, but have yet to try out wTorrent which is a web interface to the same libtorrent that rTorrent uses.
    This way you could just use safari to control your torrent downloads.

  6. Re:Apple's store by compro01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what I heard, corporations are able to be criticized for their actions.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  7. Apple's Store, my iPhone by wbates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Of course, many are quick to remind that it is Apple's store and they are free to do whatever they want with it."

    By the same token isn't it my iPhone that I am free to do what I want with it? Sure that means I can jailbreak it, but why should I be forced to just to use an app that Apple doesn't want to sell on their store?

    1. Re:Apple's Store, my iPhone by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I fail to see your point.

      If you want to buy an iPhone and jailbreak it, feel free. It's your iPhone, after all. If you want to buy an iPhone and get your apps from the App Store, cool. It's pretty useful that way, also. If you don't want to buy a iPhone, for whatever reason, that's fine too. That's how a healthy market economy works, and the iPhone isn't the only smart phone out there.

      What I don't understand is why you think Apple should sell you precisely what you want in the way you want it. Apple is willing to sell you a product with certain capabilities and limitations. They aren't required to sell something similar but different, although they do have to live with any negative effects on their market share because of that.

      So, buy or don't buy, jailbreak or don't jailbreak, but don't claim Apple is being unfair just because you find them inconvenient.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Re:What the heck do they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, actually, you're the one being stupid.

    This is about controlling the bittorrent client on your home machine, not using bittorrent locally on the phone. RTFS.

  9. Re:What the heck do they expect? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was an app to remotely control your desktop client. In other words the main utility was in starting your download again once you're on the bus and realise you forgot to unpause it.

    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  10. Stop gobbling Apple's knob? by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. If Apple wants to engage in practices that result in a chilling effect on your target market why the fuck are you going to support them?
    Because it's [LOVE]Apple{/LOVE]? Puh-leeze!
    Because it enables you to reach a large market of consumers? Oh wait, they're denying those customers access to your products!

    I'm sure Apple is great and wonderful and really really nice. I'm sure their app platform is the greatest thing since sliced stupid-people. But if they're going to actively interfere with your ability to reach customers FUCK THEM!

    And yes, it's Apple's store. They can sell or not sell whatever they feel like.
    However, it's not JUST Apple's store. It's the sole "legitimate" gateway into the devices you're writing apps for. That's part of the problem.

    To use a baseball-related metaphor. You're a beer-hawker at a ballgame. Heaven help you if you try to sell booze in OTHER than the approved manner or brand.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Stop gobbling Apple's knob? by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. If Apple wants to engage in practices that result in a chilling effect on your target market why the fuck are you going to support them?
      Because it's [LOVE]Apple{/LOVE]? Puh-leeze!
      Because it enables you to reach a large market of consumers? Oh wait, they're denying those customers access to your products!

      I'm sure Apple is great and wonderful and really really nice. I'm sure their app platform is the greatest thing since sliced stupid-people. But if they're going to actively interfere with your ability to reach customers FUCK THEM!

      And yes, it's Apple's store. They can sell or not sell whatever they feel like.
      However, it's not JUST Apple's store. It's the sole "legitimate" gateway into the devices you're writing apps for. That's part of the problem.

      To use a baseball-related metaphor. You're a beer-hawker at a ballgame. Heaven help you if you try to sell booze in OTHER than the approved manner or brand.

      Exactly.

      Example 2, you're Microsoft. No doubt the same people bleating about how Apple has the "right" to control what is available through the app store would also die in a ditch to defend Microsoft's "right" to tie whatever web browser it chooses to its own operating system, right? Right?

      *sound of wind blowing... crickets chirp*

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  11. If you don't like it.... by Budenny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't like the way Apple runs its store, don't buy from it.

            If you don't like gay marriage, don't do it.

            If you don't like murder, don't commit it.

            If you don't like France, don't go there.

            If you don't like math, don't learn it.

            If you don't care for Enron, don't buy the stock.

            If you don't like subprime, don't take one out.

            -- And in any case, don't talk any more about it.

    Why am I starting to wonder if there might not be something a little bit wrong with this form of argument?

    1. Re:If you don't like it.... by FooRat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why am I starting to wonder if there might not be something a little bit wrong with this form of argument?

      If you don't like that form of argument, don't use it.

    2. Re:If you don't like it.... by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you don't know how to make logical analogies, don't do it.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:If you don't like it.... by voisine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apart from not talking about it, I don't see anything wrong with most items on the list. The problem comes with the use of force against the unwilling. Murder and subprime fall into this category. You don't like murder, be prepared to defend yourself and your loved ones. The subprime issue was caused by fed manipulation of interest rates. i.e. price controls on credit. Central economic planning doesn't work. If you were to open a bank that wasn't part of the federal reserve system, men with guns would show up and shut you down. Again, force against the unwilling. With enron you could make an argument that fraud was the culprit.

    4. Re:If you don't like it.... by ADRA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just a side note (I totally agree with you in concept) is that most of the things that you've listed have an impact on you in one way or another regardless of your preference. Your active choice of not doing something won't mitigate the effects of it upon your life:

      Gay Marriage: Most likely won't directly affect you (unless you're gay of course).

      Murder: Will affect you (or friends/family) if you do it or not.

      Apple Store: The majority position of a system incompatible with one you choose to use means there are fewer chances that you'll get applications that you really want.

      France: Pretty low affect besides trade deficits

      Math: Your ignorance of math will only make you less valuable as a potential employee if everyone else knows it.

      Enron: Caused such a big stink not just because a single company failed. It affected investor confidence in all American companies.

      Sub Prime: Pretty much ditto of Enron. The irresponsible were punished along with the responsible.

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:If you don't like it.... by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How this post got a +4, Interesting on the heels of this fumbling, childish attempt to draw a parallel, I don't know. I'd like you to supply examples of anybody legitimately using "this form of argument" in any of the debates you provided. Citations are most certainly needed.

      I'm stunned at the logical gymnastics required to create equivalency between the legality of gay marriage, murder, and buying an app for your cell phone. Breathtaking.

  12. Re:Apple's store by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed, I've also heard that it is Apple's store and they are free to do whatever they want with it.

    I've heard this from two different sources now, so I think it's fair to say it's probably true. Off to update Wikipedia!

  13. Re:First Post by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm I the only nerd who actually use it for mostly downloading ubuntu and feroda and for WoW patches? Who has time for movies anyway?

  14. Re:Apple..... by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple has far more at stake than their user base now. With the iPod and the iTunes store, they have entered a political and business hotbed where everyone's ass is so tight they could turn coal into diamonds in a week. Apple is likely seeing that they need to be very careful if they want the big winners to keep cooperating in a pliable manner. The RIAA won't stop working with Apple if they allow BitTorrent apps on the iPhone, but you can bet that they will give Apple a much harder time of it, costing Apple lots of money just to deal with it.

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  15. Same old song and dance by uncreativeslashnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and we've been dancing it for decades. Big software corps, particularly ones that make the hardware and the software, have an incentive to make their stuff proprietary and to make it difficult to interoperate with anybody else's stuff. They lock you in, then lock you down. Apple is one of the worst offenders, here.

    I'd like to say that when a truly open competitor comes along and offers competition, people will flock to it. But they won't because that's not how it works. Normal people buy the stuff that "just works" and apple's stuff is pretty good at that. The only way around it is for hackers to do what they do so well.

    Hats off to you, hackers of the world.

  16. Re:Apple's store by Chabo · · Score: 4, Funny

    If that dress code requires top hats, though, it's not terribly reasonable.

    Wow. I'd shop at that store every day of the week!

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  17. Re:First Post by cptnapalm · · Score: 5, Funny

    People who don't play WoW?

  18. Uh oh, better watch out. by Pichu0102 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can use logmein or other vnc apps to control torrent programs on your computer. Better ban that. You could control it through a webui using safari. Better ban that too. Wait, you could set up a script to control it with a phone call or email! Better ban the phone and mail apps, just to be sure.

    Rediculous.

  19. Re:Fine, then Apple is not controlling you by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    obviously not about control because you can get apps by other means

    Are you referring to the DMCA violation known as "jailbreaking"? How deliciously absurd.

  20. Enough Already! by ADRA · · Score: 2

    I think we (Slashdot readers) get it by now what Apple's application development policies are. We don't need a weekly refresher of why Apple's policies suck. Please don't feed the trolls because this article much like the few before it contains contains nothing new that we shouldn't have known already. Someone makes a yes/no decision and you have to live with it.

    Either two things will happen: Apple doesn't change their policies and we can assume as always that most applications that are perfectly legitimate but against Apple's corporate objectives will be canned, or that Apple decided that their policies are causing more harm than good and decide to change them. If the second case happens then please be my guess and post it.

    This constant rhetoric over what should and what shouldn't be allowed is just fuelling a fire of debate that is ultimately as subjective as Apple's corporate policies.

    --
    Bye!
  21. Apple by azakem · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, Apple is free to do what they wish with their store, and we are free not to pay for their overpriced and overhyped products when saddled in this manner.

    Don't bother replying Apple fanbois, I'm not interested. It's just another corporation acting in its own best interest.

  22. From an engineers perspective: by leoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Option A) Apple products.
    Option B) The freedom to do what you want with the stuff you buy.

    Pick one and stop complaining.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  23. Android FTW. by Facegarden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seeing this story elsewhere today prompted me to check the Android Market for a similar app.

    Yup, found one and downloaded it immediately.

    Works with Transmission (like the rejected app in the story) and uTorrent, making it great for users of any platform (i think mac users have one or the other, and Transmission is great on linux, uTorrent rocks on windows).

    Gotta setup my new computer with DYNDNS again, but It looks like a nice app just from the setup options.

    I have started developing a bit (a tiny bit) for Android, and I am really starting to appreciate the platform a lot.

    I switched from windows mobile to the iphone a year ago, and then from the iphone to a G1 a few months ago, and I love my G1, it's the best phone I've ever had, and knowing now that I can develop apps for it easily (and on any platform, no less) for free (if I don't want to distribute them, or for just $25 one time developer's fee if I do) makes me REALLY like the platform.

    Android rocks.
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  24. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well now, you can just use torrentflux, supporting an open source project, and still use your iphone. :P

    http://www.torrentflux.com/

  25. Wrong Comment? by siloko · · Score: 2, Funny
    You quoted the wrong comment.

    It's also legal for a main stream book store to openly sell hardcore pornography and sex toys.

    Wow. I'd shop at that store every day of the week!

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    There, fixed that for you.

  26. Re:So, back to Windows? MS PROHIBITED LIST by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least Microsoft (so frequent target on this site) does not tell me what to run.

    Actually they do. They just came out with their own 12 Prohibited Application Types for Microsoft's Windows MarketPlace for Mobile store. You just haven't been paying attention.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  27. Re:First Post by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    there's plenty of movies you can download legally via torrents.

    If you haven't seen the great Sita Sings the Blues be sure to download it and watch it today. Yes it's legal to do so.

    And Apple, and all of you superfans who have gladly bent over for every offering of Apple's no matter how shitty and overpriced (Apple Mini?) convincing Apple that they can do whatever they want and fuck over their customers because they're too drunk on their own visions of how cool they look sitting in an overpriced coffee franchise with their black MacBook can suck my turgid, non-proprietary hardware.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  28. Re:Apple's store by SJ2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Summary:

    The example is a remote control app that allows a user to interface with their Transmission BitTorrent client.

  29. Re:You wouldn't download a car? by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 2, Funny