Slashdot Mirror


Budget Graphics Card Roundup

Anonymous Coward writes "Not all of us are prepared to drop $500 for a killer graphics card. Generally, the sweet spot in price and performance is in the budget category of GPUs. Joel Durham Jr. over at ExtremeTech reviews nine current graphics cards, all of which are below $250, some below $150, to determine which cards are worth the time and money for the gamer on a budget. In the sub $150 category, the ATI Radeon 4770 performed the best for its price. Spend a little more and Joel recommends the GeForce 260."

20 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. But can they render... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...first posts?

  2. Wrong... by Schnoogs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...the sweetspot is in the mid range. The budget cards are only good for playing those 2-3 year old games you've been putting off forever. The midrange cards allows you to play the current games at modest framerates without having to break the bank. For $200 I can get a card that will play Crysis, STALKER Clear Sky, etc at a reasonable resolution. Try doing that with a budget card.

    1. Re:Wrong... by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No problem, take two Radeon 4770 cards ($100 each) on a crossfire motherboard and they will run circles around cards in the $200 range. Together they will use less power than the $200-$300 cards, too. See this for more info.

    2. Re:Wrong... by feepness · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The summary mentions cards below $250.

      I think the problem is the definition is changing. $200 used to be in the lower quadrant. Now it is definitely mid-range. The high-end has dropped out as there is no point to be pushing X trillion pixels.

    3. Re:Wrong... by Itninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah that works. But the money you are saving on the card(s) will be more than eaten up by the need to a crossfire compatible board (i.e. one with 2+ PCI x16 slots). Mobos with only a single slot are less than half the price.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    4. Re:Wrong... by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I haven't paid over $100 for a video card in 12 years. I've always been able to max out the settings in every game I cared to buy that was available by the time I bought the card.

      And in the first half of that period, I really cared about gaming and gaming performance. I'm sure Best Buy would like you to believe that $200 is a low end device, but you're seriously much better off getting a sub-$50 card now, and another sub-$50 card in a years time if you really need to.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Wrong... by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "For $200 I can get a card that will play Crysis, STALKER Clear Sky, etc at a reasonable resolution. Try doing that with a budget card."

      RTFA Crysis, high settings, 1680x1050... 32.7 fps from the $100 Radeon 4770. Anyone want to argue that 1680x1050 isn't a "reasonable resolution"? And remember this was a benchmark, so no doubt there were 100 guys on the screen moving and shouting and explosions and all that stuff that never really happens when you're playing normally, crouching behind a tree trying not to be sniped.

      If that's not enough, spend another $100 and run 1900x1200 at 43fps

      And we haven't even touched the 20% fps gains from overclocking: "At 1680x1050, with 4xAA, you're looking at a greater-than 20% boost - nothing short of incredible."

      Yes, I bought one and it's amazing for $100. Wonder what I'll be buying in 2-3 yrs? A $70 card?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    6. Re:Wrong... by winphreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember that when SLI was new.
      People would buy two mid range cards and it had enough kick to run everything for a few years at a decent rate.

      --
      "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
    7. Re:Wrong... by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I have a beta of StarCraft III (I know a guy)"

      OMG StarCraft III?!? That's amazing considering StarCraft II is still in beta

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  3. Wait for the good deal... by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a long time PC gamer, I have come to the conclusion that there are only two reason to upgrade your video card. 1) A new fancy game you must play at high settings to enjoy needs more juice from your rig. 2) You find a good performance to price ratio card that fits your gaming needs. I tend to upgrade about once every year or year and a half. I am currently still running on the BFG OC 8800GT (for $200 in Dec 07). I play everything from the good old stand by counter-strike: source, left 4 dead, call of duty 4, far cry 2, ut3 and many more to the non graphically intense without so much as a hiccup. (I am always looking out for a new game that is worth my money and though I tend to stick to FPS I still like RPGs and MMORPGs and even the occasional RTS) Graphics != Good gameplay.

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
    1. Re:Wait for the good deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      3) Your current card fails.

      My budget card from 2005 recently started producing artifacts during light use and failing in bigger ways during heavy use. It had served me well. I was unable to play some modern games (e.g. BioShock) but there are so many interesting older games that I still haven't had time to play. It seems like what I gain from the price of a video card diminishes as the selection of games grows.

  4. All on one page please.... by Itninja · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:All on one page please.... by Spikeles · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  5. Re:Extended Windows OS Tax by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't had to upgrade my graphics cards in my Linux boxes for the last 5 years...

    Have you been avoiding a Trojan tax all these years, too?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Re:YES! Cheaper video cards at last! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not cheap enough. Seriously, $150 is a budget card? Hell you can buy an Xbox 360 for that. If I were to buy a $150 video card it would be the single most expensive component of my computer.

    If you're on a budget, and you care about value, you'll get a lot more bang for your buck by simply turning down the quality settings. After all, it's about the game play right?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Re:Radeon 4770 Discontinued by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Radeon 4770 as the best for its price for cards under $150? It's discontinued and you can't buy it from Newegg"

    New here? Radeon 4770 just came out last month. It was even covered on /. 3 weeks ago.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  8. Here's a prectical question... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does anyone know of a video card that doesn't draw much more power than my old Radeon X1650 but is better? I want to upgrade one of my machines, but I don't want to replace the PSU. I'm holding out on a new system until the i7 machines start to come down in price and I see if Windows7 is worth bothering with.

    I actually like playing last year's games. I bought Far Cry 2 for 15 bucks on Steam (they were having some sale a few months back). I like to wait a while before shelling out for the new games because a surprising number of them tend to suck, and the real reviews don't start showing up until well after the release, when most reviewers are drunk on hype.

    The exception are the Half-Life 2 episodes. I buy those right away, hoping that Freeman is finally gonna bone that Alex chick. Now that would be some FPS I could get behind.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. eVGA GTX260 216 SC and CUDA by StarHeart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just bought a eVGA GTX260 216(core) SC at Fry's for $200+$20 tax. But it had a mail in rebate for $50. Which will bring the price down to $150+$20 tax. I bought it not as a gaming card, but as a second CUDA card. I already had a PNY GTX260(192 core).

    CUDA doesn't play nice with regular graphics usage. Your machine will be really jerky every few seconds. I also didn't have room in my main computer, motherboard or power supply wise. So I put it in my second desktop that I use for iSCSI and a third monitor via synergy. The machine already had a 6600GT, which then became the secondary card. I run X off it. Which leaves the eVGA card just for CUDA. Then I can run it all day and not even notice a performance hit.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  10. Product names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Geforce 260... that can't be much better than Geforce 256, can it?

    (Hint: Maybe it's around time NVidia thought a new product name.)

  11. Budget? by sc0ob5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe I have a different opinion on what budget is.. Less than $100USD.. Here I was thinking that I'd read a hardware review on slashdot that may actually be useful to me. Alas no.