Slashdot Mirror


US Federal Government Launches Data.gov

Elastic Vapor writes "I'm happy to announce that the US Federal Government earlier today launched the new Data.Gov website. The primary goal of Data.Gov is to improve access to Federal data and expand creative use of those data beyond the walls of government by encouraging innovative ideas (e.g., web applications). Data.gov strives to make government more transparent and is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. The openness derived from Data.gov will strengthen the Nation's democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government." I hope the data reported will be impartially selected, honestly gathered, clearly explained, and perfectly accurate. Perhaps they could start with inspiration from the Concord Coalition's National Debt Counter.

109 comments

  1. Uh-oh, here we go.... by martin_henry · · Score: 2, Funny

    www.data.gov gets slashdotted in 3...2...1...

    --
    www.purevolume.com/martyd
    1. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot isn't really that powerful anymore.

    2. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      www.data.gov gets slashdotted in 3...2...1...

      But it isn't! Haven't looked at much of it but that's the first thing they got right. :)

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Openness or Control? I see it as a fail... You can probably get everything you need on google anyways... Unless it can tell me how to make millions and not pay taxes like the crooks in washington then its of no value

    4. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by esconsult1 · · Score: 1

      The days of getting slashdotted are over! Slashdot does not have enough traffic to do that anymore :-)

    5. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be surprised if ./ had less absolute traffic than it did five years ago. More likely, server and network hardware and software advancements have just significantly surpassed any growth in the ./ audience.

    6. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Says who?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by skarphace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Openness or Control? I see it as a fail... You can probably get everything you need on google anyways... Unless it can tell me how to make millions and not pay taxes like the crooks in washington then its of no value

      There's a couple problems with your 'thoughts.' First, you assume everything's already on the Web. That's totally false. Second, you neglect to realize what you can do with machine readable data. Instead of trying to build hackish page scrapers, you can now use various APIs and get bulk data dumps(depending on what the agency offers). Data.gov is freaking huge. Anyone that plays around with governmental data knows the power that this site will bring.

      The only problem I see with it so far is that it's just a portal for the most part. It's a nice way to get at all the agencies' data in one spot but so far, as of this writing, it's nothing to rave about.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    8. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It seems like there is much less activity since the "politics" section was removed. Amazingly, this occurred right after Obama replaced Bush...

    9. Re:Uh-oh, here we go.... by kramulous · · Score: 1

      How I wish we could get something like this in Australia. You have more luck getting blood from a stone than getting data out of the federal and state agencies here. They protect their own interests and taxpayer funded data acquisition.

      I generate a lot of visualisations on raw data and they all love it. But does that mean they give me the newer or full datasets? Fuck no. And you can see them making up excuses in meetings as the dodge it.

      I hope that one day our government learns from what the US is doing. I love crunching large volumes of data, manipulating and displaying in what is hopefully providing new insight to those who can formulate the patterns. Currently we live in the dark ages.

      --
      .
  2. Department of Homeland Security by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Search for "millimeter"

    0 results found

    Also not found: CIA, NSA, NASA, Project Bluebook

    1. Re:Department of Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Search for "millimeter"

      0 results found

      Also not found: CIA, NSA, NASA, Project Bluebook

      Or MK-ULTRA if you want to get an idea of what sort of people these are and what sort of goals they have.

    2. Re:Department of Homeland Security by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      Search for "millimeter"

      0 results found

      Also not found: CIA, NSA, NASA, Project Bluebook

      I did the same search and my name came up in the National Genitalia Census ;)

    3. Re:Department of Homeland Security by compro01 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try "0.039 inch".

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:Department of Homeland Security by ViennaSt · · Score: 1

      Search for everything selected and...

      A total of 27 results comes up. At least they got this database there for future use. Now all they need to do it create a part in the stimulus bill to hire all those newly graduated psychology degree holders to preform data entry.

      --
      "Engineering. Where the noble, semi-skilled laborers execute the vision of those who think and dream." -Sheldon
    5. Re:Department of Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it found in the 'People suffering from micropenis disorder' registry?

    6. Re:Department of Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millimeter?

      Not only did you not find it with DHS, you won't find it with NASA either.

    7. Re:Department of Homeland Security by slarrg · · Score: 1

      And... where's the TSA Porn?

  3. I'll finally be able to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what you did last summer, free of charge.

  4. Hope springs eternal by gammygator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I hope the data reported will be impartially selected, honestly gathered, clearly explained, and perfectly accurate."

    Good luck with that, this is the government we're talking about...

    --

    No Nyarlathotep, No Chaos
    Know Nyarlathotep, Know Chaos
    1. Re:Hope springs eternal by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good luck with that, this is the government we're talking about...

      Yeah, I think sarcasm was his point. Personally I don't get it. Nobody's perfect, but I trust .gov data more than from private companies almost any day.

    2. Re:Hope springs eternal by Ezrymyrh · · Score: 1

      Cue the Jedi mind trick, "This is not the data you are looking for"

      --
      The love of good Whiskey,Woman,Weed is all i need.
    3. Re:Hope springs eternal by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He misses the point with his naivety, but you miss it with your cynicism. The data will still be incredibly useful, even if they're trying to game it, or sloppily collecting it, or if they're putting it up in an obscure, unorganized format.

      A broad enough dataset can be used to determine things well beyond it's intended scope.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Hope springs eternal by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      A broad enough dataset can be used to determine things well beyond it's intended scope.

      Indeed, any regular reader of slashdot (or even better, any reader of RISKS Digest) should be well aware of that.
      Here's one example we all should remember:

      http://consumerist.com/345219/researches-claim-to-reverse-netflixs-anonymization

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Hope springs eternal by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Heh, that was exactly what I was thinking of.

      The thing is, there is no way that they could really sanitize it without making it obviously worthless. You could try and seed it against certain types of analysis, but you can only do that for big obvious targets. Any target where you're coming at it obliquely...I don't see how they could do it.

      That would be like trying to alter a dictionary to prevent someone from writing a certain novel.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:Hope springs eternal by timothy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was being cynical, too (hence the link to the Concord Coalition ;)). But I agree with you -- no matter *how* bad it is (and I hope that much of it won't be bad at all), it will be useful for the very reason you name.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    7. Re:Hope springs eternal by really_irish_man · · Score: 1

      lies, damn lies and data.gov!

    8. Re:Hope springs eternal by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because government agencies have no reason to manipulate data. We certainly have seen no evidence of costs being wildly underestimated when an agency is trying to get approval for a new program.

      Do you know that states hire consultants to identify ways to change their operations so that they can manipulate certain metrics that result in more federal funding? This is a fake example, but if the feds give states more money if they have a welfare fraud rate less than 10%, then the state will a) increase efforts to sign up more welfare recipients (increase the denominator) and b) reduce fraud detection mechanisms to the bare minimum required by fed guidelines (decrease the numerator).

      Most people trust the government over the private sector because their bosses are in the private sector and they have no real working experience with their government.

    9. Re:Hope springs eternal by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I hope the data reported will be impartially selected, honestly gathered, clearly explained, and perfectly accurate. Perhaps they could start with inspiration from the Concord Coalition's National Debt Counter.

      Good luck with that, this is the government we're talking about...

      What's funny about your cynicism is that the referenced website in the summary IS ALREADY depending on government data to function. The cited example is an example of an instance where the government is already living up to the promise you just scoffed at as impossible.

      http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

  5. Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by malevolentjelly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's get some of this data into Wolfram Alpha. Then we query things and get simple charts and graphs that will scare the living hell out of the average tax payer. "Annual cost of tank treads"... "total corporate welfare"...

    1. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So take free information and stick it into something that will try to claim copyright on it and any presentation thereof. That is convoluted. At least you can look at the pie charts yourself, just don't show them to anyone else.

    2. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      --

      Question everything

    3. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      So take free information and stick it into something that will try to claim copyright on it and any presentation thereof. That is convoluted. At least you can look at the pie charts yourself, just don't show them to anyone else.

      I was just inferring that Wolfram should crawl the data, not hold it.

      So I would I have to attribute Wolfram if I published any charts garnered from Alpha? Holy crap that's so unbelievably unjust. You freetards are insane.

    4. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by modestmelody · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the best tools I've found online for going through government data is the IPEDS (Integrated Post-Secondary Data System), which allows you to mine for some pretty interesting and specific information that's reported to the Department of Education by all post-secondary institutions. The ability to work with this common data collected by the government anyway makes my own research far easier.

      Wolfram|Alpha mining sets like these would just take the whole process one step further by allowing non-expert users access using plain language searches. I'm all for it.

      People want accountability from their government, but I think many of those same people a) Don't understand how to read through thousands of pages of complex collected data b) Assume the government knows how to do (a) well, and c) Are often too lazy to do (a) and based on (b) thinks it should just be laid out there in pretty pictures just because they thought that information was important in the moment. This is precisely where a tool like Wolfram|Alpha could be quite useful.

      Now if only Wolfram would list their sources and be far more clear about how a data set was collected and interpreted, then we'd really be able to get to work.

    5. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Would you please go back to 4chan, and troll there? Or brush up your character and behavior for a world a bit more real and non-anonymous?
      Protip: Using a word that ends in "-tards", makes you look like an idiot. But it still pales in comparison to combining it with the word "free".

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Would you please go back to 4chan, and troll there? Or brush up your character and behavior for a world a bit more real and non-anonymous?
      Protip: Using a word that ends in "-tards", makes you look like an idiot. But it still pales in comparison to combining it with the word "free".

      I think it's very good description for frothy-mouthed free software types. Would it be better if I called you guys louts or imbeciles or something? I am a very sensitive soul, so I just want to make sure that I am being as clear and accurate as possible and not stepping on anyones' toes.

    7. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was really from 4chan he would have called them "freefags". Apparently you need to gb2/gaia/.

    8. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by LEMONedIScream · · Score: 1

      I think it's very good description for frothy-mouthed free software types.

      Who is a "frothy-mouthed free software type"? Someone who uses it? Someone who releases software under a free license? Someone who advocates the use of free software? Someone who advocates that all software should be free?

    9. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Who is a "frothy-mouthed free software type"? Someone who uses it? Someone who releases software under a free license? Someone who advocates the use of free software? Someone who advocates that all software should be free?

      I would say it's the sort of person who attacks anyone who points out its countless shortcomings- not as a philosophy but as more implementation specific things. It's the sort of person who says that Ubuntu 9.04 is JUST AS GOOD as Mac OS X or Windows 7, completely ignoring any problems or usability pitfalls that might be present and attempting to silence anyone who says otherwise. They're the type of person who believe that anything that is "free" is always better than something proprietary, no matter how shoddy, inconsistent, and unusable it might be and pushes that belief on others. Or the type of person who mentally blocks out all the time they spend or spent on forums and IRC figuring out how to get the most basic things working in linux but then tell other people that it's all "just works". They're the people who say that monolithic kernels are better than microkernels only because Linux was never capable of implementing one. They consider things like X and gdb "advanced". It's the self-congratulating attitude that rewards mediocrity and keeps the quality bar low in the F/OSS world.

      Zealots, basically. I consider myself software agnostic. I hold all software to the same standard and have no sympathy for free software failures, since they push it as a complete product. I have strong views on end user product quality.

      More clear?

    10. Re:Stick it in Wolfram Alpha by gb506 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points - that sums up a freetard quite nicely.

  6. Mostly empty by Rgb465 · · Score: 1

    There doesn't appear to be much data indexed yet, just data that has been publicly available for years.
    Patent data? Check
    Storm data? Check

    Yawn. Call me when the FBI starts uploading data.

    1. Re:Mostly empty by system1111 · · Score: 1

      If anything this is more about accessibility. I once had to do a project working with archived data from NOAA. A site like this would have saved me a lot of time.. As with anything give it time and it will hopefully get better.. Either that or wither and die in a new administration =P

  7. Now renamed by zoomshorts · · Score: 1

    Hacked Data dot com. Coming to an Identity Theft near you!

  8. Limited but good potential by Statecraftsman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far I see only 47 datasets available(is that the best you can do US Gov't?!?!) but the best thing about this site is that it serves as an official directory to myriad data sources. Higher visibility of that data to the general public may encourage more citizens to ask for this kind of data for their areas of interest or for their jurisdictions. So overall this is a good thing. The only thing I wish they would do is provide a forum/mailing list where data consuming developers can coordinate their tools to process this data. I expressed more about this idea here: http://www.thenationaldialogue.org/ideas/grow-a-development-data-analysis-community

    1. Re:Limited but good potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far I see only 47 datasets available(is that the best you can do US Gov't?!?!)

      Well, the site only just went up.

    2. Re:Limited but good potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This list exists.

      http://groups.google.com/group/poliparse?hl=en

    3. Re:Limited but good potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't even list data.gov, yet. Clearly data.gov is a dataset (containing information about government datasets) and should be included.

  9. IIS, once again by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Informative

    $ curl -i http://data.gov/
    HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
    Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:13:00 GMT
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0

    Bah!

    1. Re:IIS, once again by Alinabi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget about IIS. Most of the data is in DBF format. DBF!!! How about using some non-proprietary format from this century like, say, XML.

      --
      "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    2. Re:IIS, once again by wumpus188 · · Score: 1

      What's so proprietary about dbf? It's so ancient, the specs themselves are old... f.i. here's some. I'm sure there are many free/oss converters too.

    3. Re:IIS, once again by skarphace · · Score: 1

      What's so proprietary about dbf? It's so ancient, the specs themselves are old... f.i. here's some. I'm sure there are many free/oss converters too.

      Have you ever tried to work with DBFs with any open source tools out there? It makes me want to break my fingers so I can't type and have an excuse not to mess with it.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    4. Re:IIS, once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ curl -i http://data.gov/
      HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
      Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:13:00 GMT
      Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0

      Bah!

      Would you prefer this method? :)

      $request=[system.net.httpwebrequest]::create("http://data.gov") ; $request.getresponse() | select-
      object {$_.Server}

      $_.Server
      ---------
      Microsoft-IIS/6.0

  10. GoogleBot... by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1

    "More input, more input!"

  11. Who Needs Wolfram Alpha?: +1, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask former Soviet soldiers.

    Yours In Socialism,
    Kilgore Trout

  12. Like Wolfram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! This is as useful as Wolfram Alpha! I bet Wolfram will include these sets in its searches, too. Then instead of returning no results, it will return "Wolfram|Alpha does not know what to do with your input." or maybe "Wolfram|Alpha knows what to do with your input will put it in [list of countries currently in total nighttime]."

  13. They should hire the wallstats ``death and taxes'' by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    poster guy:

    http://www.wallstats.com/deathandtaxes/

    Or at least learn from it and similar presentations.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  14. Unbiased opinion? by kmac06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. The openness derived from Data.gov will strengthen the Nation's democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

    That sounds like it was written by the Ministry of Truth. No one should ever read something like that without huge warning bells going off.

    1. Re:Unbiased opinion? by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      ...what part of it sounds like it's from the Ministry of Truth?

      I mean, really. I've worked with data from a myriad of sources and I can guarantee you that the US government supplied data is by far the cleanest, most unbiased stuff out there. (And, no, no one's going to have the resources to estimate national GDP going back a century and a half other than the US government.)

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    2. Re:Unbiased opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we'll be lucky and the data they provide will be as valuable as our currency! Backed by the full faith of the US Gov't...

    3. Re:Unbiased opinion? by locallyunscene · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be the Ministry of Truth if this organization made sure it was the only supplier and analyzer of this information, rather than allowing it to escape on "the internet".

      The data itself could be heavily biased, but since the current data sets seem to be census data and similar sets(taxes, marriage/divorce rates), it doesn't seem to have the aim of a propaganda tool currently.

      It could be turned to one to be sure, but if it does provide moderately raw data sets then I'd say it would promote democracy.

  15. Will it change with each new administration? by really_irish_man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The government is an easy target to pick on, but they do have some really useful sites such as thomas.loc.gov and census.gov. Data.gov is a great concept, my only concern is will it change every time a new president takes office? Just as the various executive orders are issued and rescinded based on who's in power, will they also tinker with what data, data.gov will own?

    1. Re:Will it change with each new administration? by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      That's not the real issue. Data.gov and other measures of transparency are really a double edged sword.

      On the one hand, they *try* to get government to seem more accountable and transparent. Supposedly, when the government wants to say... bailout a bank, you will have the ability to see that money is going.

      On the other hand, it might actually lead to more centralized government in the false belief that we can keep checks on things via this 'transparency'.

      Unfortunately, a lot of people... who have never ran anything, seem to have this idea that with the right rules and regulations, you can make any system honest. They always forget those in the centralized body will work for their own benefit as in every society that tried central planning.

      So while I welcome any and all transparency in government, including data.gov, I have big reservations about the philosophy of those in government who are pushing for it.

    2. Re:Will it change with each new administration? by Improv · · Score: 1

      Not everyone shares your philosophy. Personally, I trust the federal government much more than I would trust state or more local levels of government. There are risks of misgovernance at *any* level, and tearing down the centre just makes civilisation run more bumpily.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  16. Price of Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just need your social security number and a major credit card...

    Sneaky way to solve the tax crisis?

  17. finally! by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    A /. post I can USE!

    PS: The data you get from the US government is infinitely more reliable than from any other country out there. Need I say: China?

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  18. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by frankie · · Score: 1

    Hmm... that Elastic Vapor guy is from Toronto, Canada. It seems FOREIGNERS are very happy indeed about this new database.

    So, how many days until the 10:00 news is crowing that Obama is spending our tax dollars to give American secrets to other countries?

  19. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by frankie · · Score: 1

    p.s. Even worse, he's doing it ON THE INTERNET! Just like a CRAIGSLIST call girl!

  20. "creative use" by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    if they really want "creative use" of government data, they'll release those interrogation photos so we can finally get to work photochoppin'.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  21. I hate wide sites... by leipold · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and this one needs a browser window at least 1024 pixels wide. And if you use large fonts (some of us have bad eyes) the layout breaks.

    Three cheers for accessibility!

  22. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by rpillala · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fox was reporting recently that higher fuel efficiency standards put your family's lives on the line. When really it's driving that does that.

    So it shouldn't be too long.

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  23. Couldn't do it. by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    "I hope the data reported will be impartially selected, honestly gathered, clearly explained, and perfectly accurate."

    At which point I was glad that the article was essentially over, because I couldn't suspend my disbelieve any longer...that, and I was laughing hysterically.

  24. Timothy by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    I hope the data reported will be impartially selected, honestly gathered, clearly explained, and perfectly accurate.

    Sorry, but HA.

  25. webservice? by warrior389 · · Score: 1

    is this just a list of data from other government sites? why no central proxy, web services, atom feeds, or other useful features besides just linking?

    1. Re:webservice? by skarphace · · Score: 1

      is this just a list of data from other government sites? why no central proxy, web services, atom feeds, or other useful features besides just linking?

      So far, yes. But it sounds like they will eventually become a clearing house of the data. It's a start.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
  26. America is not a Democracy by sglider · · Score: 1

    As much as the Left would like for us to be, we are NOT a democracy. We're a constitutional Republic.

    --
    War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
    1. Re:America is not a Democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why I use the term "Participatory Governments" to include all forms government where citizens are allowed to vote, from Direct Democracies to Republics with elected representatives.

    2. Re:America is not a Democracy by haroldpatterson · · Score: 1

      As much as the Left would like for us to be, we are NOT a democracy.

      A direct democracy? No. We use a form of representative democracy.

      We're a constitutional Republic.

      And in common American usage of the term Republic just means a form of representative democracy.

  27. Mirror it quick by TomRC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope someone will mirror the data there the instant it appears, so when someone in power decides that an inconveniently revealed truth needs to be shoved down the memory hole, a web app will instantly highlight any redacted information.

    1. Re:Mirror it quick by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Mirror it quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for volunteering. Good eye!

  28. So many uses by dave562 · · Score: 1

    It would great if it includes data on legislation and if that data can then be tagged by industries (health care, telecom, etc) impacted by the legislation. The data can then be cross-referenced against campaign contributions, and we can extrapolate who voted on what based on how much money they received in contributions from the effected industries.

    It would be great if the contents of political speeches were uploaded, and that data tagged by interest group. The speeches can then be cross-referenced against legislation votes to determine whether or not the politicans are really putting their votes where they say their interests lie.

  29. Vague website name, or vaguest website name? by whiledo · · Score: 1

    I just feel like it could be a little more vague. I suggest "thing.it" or possibly "yadayadaya.da".

    --
    Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    1. Re:Vague website name, or vaguest website name? by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that you can't connect the dots between 'government data' and 'data.gov'.

      Well, never mind, this IS Slashdot... the 'data' stands for 'data' and the 'gov' stands for 'government'.

      HTH

    2. Re:Vague website name, or vaguest website name? by whiledo · · Score: 1

      As opposed to all the non-data being posted under the .gov domain?

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    3. Re:Vague website name, or vaguest website name? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      As opposed to all the non-data being posted under the .gov domain?

      Ideally all of the other data on .gov would be available on Data.gov as well.

      What would you suggest they call it?

      DataThatIsAvailableElsewhereOn TheGovDomainButFormattedForEasyParseingAndDataMining.gov

      It's a website that provides government data. Government Data. Data.Gov. I don't know how they could be more clear and accurate in their description.

    4. Re:Vague website name, or vaguest website name? by whiledo · · Score: 1

      What would you suggest they call it?

      Isn't it obvious? This site is going to wind up pointing to a lot of other sites that ACTUALLY hold the data, like census.gov or irs.gov, because departmentalizing things like that always works better than trying to jam it all together into one hairball. So what do we call things that point you other places based on categories of interest?

      index.gov

      directory.gov

      Hell, I'd even settle for home.gov or start.gov. But data.gov? That's just silly.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
  30. Your point is? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    So, apparently, it's not important for the electorate in a republic to have information available, which might help them be better informed voters? Yes, the USA is not a *direct* democracy, but I've always been taught that a republic is a type of democracy.

  31. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Fox was reporting recently that higher fuel efficiency standards put your family's lives on the line. "

    While that statement is a bit extreme...it does have some possibilities that way.

    To get a car with super low mileage, it will have to be quite small, and light...possibly affecting how it would end up on the wrong side of a crash with another car.

    Remember...those old cars, trucks and SUV's aren't going to disappear immediately, they'll be around for decades. And in an accident with a little econo lightweight, well, the new car is gonna get smooshed.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  32. Casualty log in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have a detailed casualty log of the total number of people tortured, killed, maimed or injured in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Number of people killed by predator drones, number of people bombed, number of suicide attack victims, number of "drop weapon" cases, etc.

  33. Manifests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it show who was on Air Force One when it buzzed NYC? Hmmmmmmmm?

  34. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by Reece400 · · Score: 1

    I've been in two accidents, Ford SUV t-bones Dodge Neon into a sign and GM Pickup t-bones Rear end of Dodge Neon. (me in the neon)

    In both cases no one had more than bruises. In the first case, both vehicles were totaled (Equal damage). In the second case, we drove away and popped the dent in the plastic back out with a prybar leaving only creases in the paint while the truck was leaving coolant and the front frame was badly damaged.

  35. Change we can believe in? by objekt · · Score: 1

    Where's the new era of openness we were promised?

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  36. surely you cant be suggesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that presidents manipulate government data to support their own ideas. i am shocked, and appalled.

  37. The contrarian view by Brandybuck · · Score: 0

    The openness derived from Data.gov will strengthen the Nation's democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

    While I consider openness to be an extremely desirable trait of government, I must question the goals of efficiency and effectiveness. The first examples I think of when I hear the phrase "efficient government" are Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Until they got obsessed with endless warfare, they were quite efficient governments. They got the trains to run on time! They kept meticulous records of the people they gassed! I hope to God we will never again see such organizational skills in the hands of an evil government/

    While efficiency and effectiveness are worthy attributes, they should not be the goal. Instead we should aim for GOOD government. I would much rather have an inefficient good government than an efficient bad government.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  38. Tomorrow's headlines today! by sootman · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, 5/22/2009: "1 TB disk stolen from data.gov"

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  39. laboratoryofthestates.com by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Try laboratoryofthestates.com which I set up after the Feds decided to turn the national IT infrastructure over to India and send guys the guys who built the information industry to go eat out of dumpsters.

    I did it on no money and it has more data than data.gov.

    1. Re:laboratoryofthestates.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your website is amazing!!!

    2. Re:laboratoryofthestates.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is really cool but can you explain how it works? Does this mean that one Arab out of 5 uses cocaine? That seems unlikely...

    3. Re:laboratoryofthestates.com by bfrpsw · · Score: 1

      Hm. Nothing since 2003 on the front page. I set up my own access to US Economic data from US government sources: http://www.macrospect.com./ Currently has 177,000 data series from BEA, BLS, Census, OFHEO, FED. Data updated daily as it's released by the publishing agency. Browsing and graphing data is free.

    4. Re:laboratoryofthestates.com by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      bfrpsw writes: Nothing since 2003 on the front page.

      True enough but my money ran out in 2002 and I've been dumpster diving ever since.

      bfrpsw continues: I set up my own access to US Economic data from US government sources: http://www.macrospect.com./

      Excellent!

      One of the things I've been thinking of promoting is a compression prize, similar to the Hutter Prize, but where the corpus is economic data instead of textual knowledge.

      Of course, this would separate the men from the boys in economics so it won't happen, but its interesting to think about what would happen if economics turned into a legitimate intellectual endeavor.

  40. Maybe my wiretaps will be on there? by zifr · · Score: 1

    I give it 4 months until data.gov is accidentally connected to everyones wiretaps or the SSA database. ooops. I can see it now [slashdot]320 million social security numbers were posted on wikieleaks after data.gov ....[/slashdot]

  41. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... GM Pickup t-bones Rear end of Dodge Neon ...

    You keep using that word, t-bones; I do not think it means what you think it means.

  42. I did hear Obama liked Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But is setting up websites about TNG characters the best use of government resources.

  43. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember...those old cars, trucks and SUV's aren't going to disappear immediately, they'll be around for decades. And in an accident with a little econo lightweight, well, the new car is gonna get smooshed.

    Obviously the solution is to continue buying huge cars. Right?

  44. Redundant? by gy+equals+c · · Score: 1

    Given all the stories of successful hacks into gov't systems, why did we need this again? Seems like people were getting to the data just fine before.

  45. Re:Unbiased opinion? BLAME CANADA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Obviously the solution is to continue buying huge cars. Right?"

    Not necessarily....but, I don't think it should be the federal govt. dictating what cars companies can make. Let them come up with all types of cars for all types of tastes, and let the market decide. Thing is...we need to be willing to let a company fail if they can't get it right.....newer ones can start up to take their place. Hell, let them go into bankruptcy, and shed those anchors of labor contracts that are an outdated burden on the US companies keeping them uncompetitive.

    But that won't happen...that's why the Dems won't let the companies go do the full bankruptcy they need to do...they're too beholden to the labor unions.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  46. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I found is some BS environmental data

  47. Democracy and strengthen...Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The openness derived from Data.gov will strengthen the Nation's democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government."

    Ahem...The United States is not now, nor has it ever been a democracy. Nowhere in the constitution will you find the word democracy. You can not strengthen something that does not exist, not in the US anyway.