Investigators Replicate Nokia 1100 Banking Hack
Ian Lamont writes "Investigators have duplicated an online banking hack using a 2003-era Nokia mobile phone. Authorities had been aware for some time that European gangs were interested in buying the phone, and were finally able to confirm why: It can be used to access victims' bank accounts using "special software written by hackers." The hack apparently works by letting criminals reprogram the phones to use someone else's phone number and receive their SMS messages, including mTANs (mobile transaction authentication numbers) from European banks. However, the only phones that work are 1100 handsets (pictures) made in a certain factory. Nokia had claimed last month it had no idea why criminals were paying thousands of euros to buy the old handsets."
It may be illegal, but the hackers deserve some credit for being able to figure this out.
"The modified firmware is then uploaded to the Nokia 1100. Certain models of the 1100 used erasable ROM, which allows data to be read and written to the chip, Becker said."
If that's the case, how hard would it be to desolder a non-flashable ROM and replace it with one that is? It would certainly be more hassle than buying a phone already built that way, but with the right tools and enough effort, why wouldn't any phone be susceptible to this type of attack?
I've got one of these in my pocket right now. Do you think it would raise any suspicion if I posted it on eBay now?
Nokia 1100 L000000K! RARE! HACK BANKS!!!
Smart move from Nokia trying to outsell the iPhone
from tfa: That application allows a hacker to decrypt the Nokia 1100's firmware, Becker said. Then, the firmware can be modified and information such as the IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) number can be changed as well as the IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identity) number, which allows a phone to register itself with an operator.
Uh... this ability is hardly unique to this device, I have a feeling there's something else they're not telling us.
e to the pi i plus one equals zero
Correct. The real defect here isn't the phone, it's the system it's spoofing. This phone just makes it easier to construct the spoof.
If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
Here on /. we're always bragging about find good use for old hardware. Well these guys did just that, and now you're going to chastise them for it.
You people have been asking for us to recycle our electronics for years now, bitching about throwing away cell phones, and their toxic batteries. This guys deserve some sort of award for this.
Good job
where can I get one?
Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
You've turned him to a life of crime!!
May the Maths Be with you!
I'm guessing it won't take long for these phones to be outlawed in the EU though.
Yeah, legal prohibition is an excellent way to prevent people from using something. It works so fantastically well for drugs, guns and pirated music/movies.
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
A number of people in IT seem to believe that the only acceptable form of security - particularly as it relates to anything remotely important - is one which is not susceptible to any sort of attack, real or theoretical, until some time after the heat death of the universe.
Banks don't. They know full well that there will always be a certain amount of fraud no matter what you do.
Every change you want to make to the bank's system costs - in man hours to develop, test and deploy the fix and also in terms of the risk of something going wrong when you come to deploy, Most of these costs can be boiled down to cold hard cash. If making the necessary changes will cost more than the amount of fraud it's expected to prevent, don't be surprised to see nothing change.
Rest assured that these people count cash all day long, they can certainly work out exactly how much such changes will cost.
1. physical access to SIM-card to get the IMSI
2. info on bank account / phone number
3. hacking in PC/internet connection to determine if/when the code is used.
4. raise no suspicion when a code is sent and not received by the original recipient, and recipient is not able to call/being called or send/receive text because the original phone will be blocked until it is paired again with the GSM-system (power cycled)
5. you need to have a bank that does have this system. (mine does not)
so not as viable as it looks.
There's an app for that...
This article is plain stupid, Nokia 1110 has nothing than other phones in the same Nokia DCT4 family don't have, while DCT4 firmwares can be decrypted, Nokia DCT3 phones(Nokia 3310, etc) are much more well suited for this job, given the fact that already exists an open source(GPL) firmware in C for this devices... And about SIM cloning, YOU CANÂT clone a GSM SIM card in seconds!!!! The most advanced software for clone SIM cards(SimScan - http://users.net.yu/~dejan/) still has to do some brute-force to extract the Ki key, witch is designed to never leave the card, while we can extract IMSI with no problems , to clone a SIM card, you need two values: IMSI and Ki, and without Ki, IMSI is worthless...
I'm guessing it won't take long for these phones to be outlawed in the EU though.
Yeah, legal prohibition is an excellent way to prevent people from using something. It works so fantastically well for drugs, guns and pirated music/movies.
Don't forget hookers. I think it's illegal to mention drugs and guns without mentioning hookers. And just to be safe, let's mention blackjack.
Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?