Slashdot Mirror
Investigators Replicate Nokia 1100 Banking Hack
Ian Lamont writes "Investigators have duplicated an online banking hack using a 2003-era Nokia mobile phone. Authorities had been aware for some time that European gangs were interested in buying the phone, and were finally able to confirm why: It can be used to access victims' bank accounts using "special software written by hackers." The hack apparently works by letting criminals reprogram the phones to use someone else's phone number and receive their SMS messages, including mTANs (mobile transaction authentication numbers) from European banks. However, the only phones that work are 1100 handsets (pictures) made in a certain factory. Nokia had claimed last month it had no idea why criminals were paying thousands of euros to buy the old handsets."
"The modified firmware is then uploaded to the Nokia 1100. Certain models of the 1100 used erasable ROM, which allows data to be read and written to the chip, Becker said."
If that's the case, how hard would it be to desolder a non-flashable ROM and replace it with one that is? It would certainly be more hassle than buying a phone already built that way, but with the right tools and enough effort, why wouldn't any phone be susceptible to this type of attack?
I've got one of these in my pocket right now. Do you think it would raise any suspicion if I posted it on eBay now?
Nokia 1100 L000000K! RARE! HACK BANKS!!!
Smart move from Nokia trying to outsell the iPhone
I guess they think as well that they deserve some credit. That's why they are breaking into a bank.
Ezekiel 23:20
You've turned him to a life of crime!!
May the Maths Be with you!
That's debit, silly.
The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
Agreed - the explanation seems weird. I'm not sure about Nokia patching scene, but most of the Siemens *45, *55, *65 phones could be completely reprogrammed and were well understood. SL45 was one of the best examples - it's annotated assembler firmware was so nice to work with that people simply wrote binary patches in assembler, or used C compiler + binary patched some jump addresses. There were complete design notes circulating on P2P networks. I'm not sure what can be so specific to Nokia 1100 that they don't want to reprogram any other device.
Even better - if they're good enough to reprogram Nokia to interact directly with SIM and GSM module, why won't they just buy GSM modules themselves and clone some random SIM cards? It's not like GSM transmitters are some controlled goods available only to Nokia et al. If you can afford 100 of them, they should be quite easy to obtain.
So yeah - it seems there's something more going on here. Or they're just some script kiddies who bought a "hacking technique" from someone more advanced and now they can only replicate the issue on that one device.
I'm guessing it won't take long for these phones to be outlawed in the EU though.
Yeah, legal prohibition is an excellent way to prevent people from using something. It works so fantastically well for drugs, guns and pirated music/movies.
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
A number of people in IT seem to believe that the only acceptable form of security - particularly as it relates to anything remotely important - is one which is not susceptible to any sort of attack, real or theoretical, until some time after the heat death of the universe.
Banks don't. They know full well that there will always be a certain amount of fraud no matter what you do.
Every change you want to make to the bank's system costs - in man hours to develop, test and deploy the fix and also in terms of the risk of something going wrong when you come to deploy, Most of these costs can be boiled down to cold hard cash. If making the necessary changes will cost more than the amount of fraud it's expected to prevent, don't be surprised to see nothing change.
Rest assured that these people count cash all day long, they can certainly work out exactly how much such changes will cost.
1. physical access to SIM-card to get the IMSI
2. info on bank account / phone number
3. hacking in PC/internet connection to determine if/when the code is used.
4. raise no suspicion when a code is sent and not received by the original recipient, and recipient is not able to call/being called or send/receive text because the original phone will be blocked until it is paired again with the GSM-system (power cycled)
5. you need to have a bank that does have this system. (mine does not)
so not as viable as it looks.
There's an app for that...
This article is plain stupid, Nokia 1110 has nothing than other phones in the same Nokia DCT4 family don't have, while DCT4 firmwares can be decrypted, Nokia DCT3 phones(Nokia 3310, etc) are much more well suited for this job, given the fact that already exists an open source(GPL) firmware in C for this devices... And about SIM cloning, YOU CANÂT clone a GSM SIM card in seconds!!!! The most advanced software for clone SIM cards(SimScan - http://users.net.yu/~dejan/) still has to do some brute-force to extract the Ki key, witch is designed to never leave the card, while we can extract IMSI with no problems , to clone a SIM card, you need two values: IMSI and Ki, and without Ki, IMSI is worthless...
Bullshit. Not on any properly run network. Apart from the IMEI (which is written on the back of the phone) and the IMSI (which you can get with a special code from some phones) there's also the Ki. This is a secret which is buried in the SIM card and _never_ sent out to the phone. Without the physical SIM card in your phone you do not have the number.
Now, there have been flaws in this; it has been possible to clone the SIM card because of implementation flaws, but properly made new SIMS should not have most of these. The authentication algorithms used originally were weak and could leak the key, but modern SIMs should be using stronger ones (e.g. AES). However none of these were magically to do with one particular model of a phone.
Something different is going on here. E.g. a security company marketing scam or that the mobile can work as a short range base station and do interception or something else. Definitely not the way that it seems to be explained in the article. And definitely not that the just "changed the IMEI and the IMSI and became the other subscriber"; apart from anything else, you have no need to change the IMEI to do that.
=~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();