Slashdot Mirror


Mars Robot May Destroy Life It Was Sent To Find

Hugh Pickens writes "New Scientist reports that instead of identifying chemicals that could point to life, NASA's robot explorers may have been toasting them by mistake. Even if Mars never had life, comets and asteroids that have struck the planet should have scattered at least some organic molecules over its surface but landers have failed to detect even minute quantities of organic compounds. Now scientists say they may have stumbled on something in the Martian soil that may have, in effect, been hiding the organics: a class of chemicals called perchlorates. At low temperatures, perchlorates are relatively harmless but when heated to hundreds of degrees Celsius perchlorates release a lot of oxygen, which tends to cause any nearby combustible material to burn. The Phoenix and Viking landers looked for organic molecules by heating soil samples to similarly high temperatures to evaporate them and analyse them in gas form. When Douglas Ming of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, and colleagues tried heating organics and perchlorates like this on Earth, the resulting combustion left no trace of organics behind. "We haven't looked the right way," says Chris McKay of NASA's Ames Research Center. Jeffrey Bada of the University of California, San Diego, agrees that a new approach is needed. He is leading work on a new instrument called Urey which will be able to detect organic material at concentrations as low as a few parts per trillion. The good news is that, although Urey heats its samples, it does so in water, so the organics cannot burn up."

28 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. We can't let them kill the Mars life by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suggest we send someone back in time to prevent the robot from killing the life on Mars.

    1. Re:We can't let them kill the Mars life by robably · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is there a Bad Analogy Guy fan club? Or t-shirt, hat, walking stick, mouse pad, frisbee, wallpaper or carpet? Bad Analogy of the Day desk calendar? iPhone App? Your ideas intrigue me, I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. Or RSS feed, whichever.

    2. Re:We can't let them kill the Mars life by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is there a Bad Analogy Guy fan club?

      Yes. Much bigger than yours, maybe half the size of mine (and thank you for your support.) :D

      Anyone who says slashdot isn't a game isn't paying attention.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:We can't let them kill the Mars life by Faylone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, yes. You can get an RSS feed for ANY user on Slashdot in their profile.

  2. So it makes soup? by Onyma · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mmm... organics boiled in water. Now I know what I'm having for lunch.

    --
    Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
    1. Re:So it makes soup? by Onyma · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, replying to myself with an afterthought. Isn't this basically what we did to most of the life on our own planet? "Broiled or boiled, what would you prefer?"

      --
      Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
  3. In other words, HG Wells had it backwards by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, instead of the Martians coming here, blowing stuff up and then catching a cold and dying out, we go there, give them heat and wipe them out first? I suppose the best defense really is a good offense!

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:In other words, HG Wells had it backwards by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be a Mars-shattering kaboom!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:In other words, HG Wells had it backwards by newcastlejon · · Score: 2, Funny

      This way we get to keep their stuff, if you're going to raze you might as well pillage!

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  4. Simple explanation.. by gbutler69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Organic "compounds" can be created (and often are) through other processes other than life. So, even if there were NO life on Mars, there should be some organic compounds. The fact that they are not finding any, combined with the finding of perchlorates (i.e. used for rocket fuel, explosives, etc) shows that there is something wrong with their experimental set-up.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Simple explanation.. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only problem with that is that it's not a very rare process. Seems like every other week some scientist has looked somewhere odd you'd never suspect and has found organic chemistry happening there. All life (as we know it, Jim ;)) is organic chemistry, but not all organic chemistry is life.

  5. Didn't they test this before? by societyofrobots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see it odd they didn't even test the chemical detector process in realistic simulant soil before launching it to Mars . . .

    1. Re:Didn't they test this before? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before the launched the chemical detectors to Mars, they didn't have a real good idea what chemicals were present in the soil in order to develop the a realistic simulant.

  6. Apropos alien life by rkaa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For the benefit of new readers and the general perspective; an old short-story by Terry Bisson: http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/96q1/meat.html
    It's a "must read" if you haven't, just give in and click the link.

  7. So let me get this straight.. by stonetony · · Score: 2, Funny

    They've built a perchlorate percolator?

  8. Misleading headline by noidentity · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mars Robot May Destroy Life It Was Sent To Find

    implies that it destroyed all life on the planet (the "life it was sent to find"). Instead, it sounds like its life detector merely destroys signs of life in the samples it's testing.

  9. Re:What by thirty-seven · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why would we expect comets or asteroids to carry organics? Haven't they been around much longer than life?

    • A) Because we know that comets, asteroids, and other interstellar objects and dust do contain organic chemicals: see astrochemistry
    • B) Because organic chemicals have also been around much longer than life has. You may be interested to know that vitalism has been discredited by the synthesis of urea.
    --

    Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

  10. Re:2.45 GHz by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wouldn't you want to use an IR Spectrometer?

    I'm actually somewhat surprised that we've never sent one up to Mars, given that you can find one in most research facilities today.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  11. Martian bonfires anyone ? by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The title is very misleading.

    No-one thought that heating samples to 400 or 600 C would be good for any bacteria. The point is that they thought samples would outgas any organics. Now it seems they might be burned in the process. But in neither case were these tests designed to keep microbes alive.

    Note that one implication here is that Martian soil will burn even under Martian conditions if you heat it properly - it has its own oxygen supply.

    Martian bonfires anyone ?

    1. Re:Martian bonfires anyone ? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Martian bonfires anyone ?

      Didn't he write Born To Be Wild?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Martian bonfires anyone ? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note that one implication here is that Martian soil will burn even under Martian conditions if you heat it properly - it has its own oxygen supply.
      Martian bonfires anyone ?

      The soil itself won't catch fire. There just happens to be just enough perchlorate to combust the tiny amounts of organics at the right temperature. Heat the soil, it gives off a few wisps of smoke, maybe a sparkle or two. Not nearly enough to start a self-sustaining fire.

    3. Re:Martian bonfires anyone ? by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Test it on what all that other Martian top soil NASA has bags of in their garage?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Martian bonfires anyone ? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OK: so the proper title would be: "...may destroy life signs it was sent to find."

      On the bright side, though, if we can show that Martian soil contains a big enough volume of perchlorates, it might be possible to use that knowledge to lower the payload of a manned mission (in-situ oxygen generation).

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  12. How it's supposed to be done. by had3l · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, the Human way of finding life:

    Astronaut 1: "So, any signs of life?"

    Astronaut 2: *shooting a flamethrower at the ground* "None."

    Astronaut 1: "Ok, just to be sure let's blow everything up and scan the debris."

  13. Re:I am Lrrr by newcastlejon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your cup of spunk is in the mail.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  14. Re:Sorry to reply to myself... by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am not sticking that part of myself into an oven, if that's what you're getting at.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  15. Re:What NASA by camperdave · · Score: 2

    Or better yet, just cut back your armed forces by 10%

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  16. Robinson Crusoe on Mars... by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like a major plot point of the old 60's movie "Robinson Crusoe on Mars", where the protagonist, a stranded astronaut, discovers that some rocks he found to put around his fire, release oxygen when heated (he discovers that just as he's running out of his bottled air). Sounds like it might be worth looking at as an oxygen source for colonies, if it produces enough O2 to be useful.

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes