Slashdot Mirror


Earth Could Collide With Other Planets

Everybody put on your helmet; Smivs writes "Astronomers calculate there is a tiny chance that Mars or Venus could collide with Earth — though it would not happen for at least a billion years. The finding comes from simulations to show how orbits of planets might evolve billions of years into the future. But the calculated chances of such events occurring are tiny. Writing in the journal Nature, a team led by Jacques Laskar shows there is also a chance Mercury could strike Venus and merge into a larger planet. Professor Laskar of the Paris Observatory and his colleagues also report that Mars might experience a close encounter with Jupiter — whose massive gravity could hurl the Red Planet out of our Solar System."

36 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Not soon enough for me by DragonFodder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    mors certa, hora incerta

    --
    Wherever you go... There you are. B.B.
  2. Or earth could turn into an elephant by GreenEnvy22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are tiny odds of just about anything happening, why is it news?

    1. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are tiny odds of just about anything happening, why is it news?

      Yeah, and we can't even use the excuse that it was a posting by kdawson. Come on, Taco!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As Stephen King said, "Everything's eventual."

      Yeah, man, everything's REAL eventual :-)

      Great line - I keep telling myself that.

    3. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are tiny odds of just about anything happening

      I know that fervent believers will condemn my denial of the Elephant Rapture, but there is zero chance of the Earth turning into a proboscidean of any sort.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    4. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Informative

      From TFAbstract, helpfully linked downstream:

      It has been established that, owing to the proximity of a resonance with Jupiter, Mercury's eccentricity can be pumped to values large enough to allow collision with Venus within 5 Gyr (refs 1â"3). This conclusion, however, was established either with averaged equations1, 2 that are not appropriate near the collisions or with non-relativistic models in which the resonance effect is greatly enhanced by a decrease of the perihelion velocity of Mercury2, 3. In these previous studies, the Earth's orbit was essentially unaffected. Here we report numerical simulations of the evolution of the Solar System over 5 Gyr, including contributions from the Moon and general relativity.

      The authors claim this is the first extended simulation set incorporating GR and avoiding the problematic averaging technique.

    5. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I realize the linked article doesn't have the 1% figure, here's a better article:

      http://www.universetoday.com/2009/06/10/wild-little-mercury-to-cause-interplanetary-smashup-maybe/

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    6. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by jstults · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, it was the Ars article: http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/06/kicking-a-planet-out-of-the-solar-system-physically.ars They mention a 'complex time integration scheme' fourth paragraph down. Though with the state of technical journalism on the intrawebs that could mean Euler or leap-frog.

    7. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by sherriw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Combine that headline with a nice cover graphic of planets smashing up into bits, and it sells magazines. Welcome to the publishing world.

    8. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by dickens · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's Elephants all the way down, damn it!

    9. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by jstults · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey Thanks! Here's a good survey of 'symplectic integrators': http://math.berkeley.edu/~alanw/242papers99/markiewicz.pdf Basically, choosing the parameters of your integration scheme smartly (based on the system you're integrating) so you do a better job at conserving energy for long time integrations. The example they give in that survey article is exactly this problem (solar system orbit simulation).

    10. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by jae471 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mercury's eccentricity can be pumped to values large enough to allow collision with Venus within 5 Gyr

      Except that in 5 Gy Sol will be a red giant and have already engulfed Mercury and Venus, and probably Earth as well.

    11. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by mrdoogee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    12. Re:Or earth could turn into an elephant by Quothz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As Stephen King said, "Everything's eventual."

      He did not. I'm sure he said those words at some point, but not as a statement. He entitled a story "Everything's Eventual" (hell, likely as not, his editor entitled it). Pat Conroy did not say "The lords of discipline", John Barth did not say "Lost in the funhouse", and Douglas Beane did not say "Too wong foo, thanks for everything, Julie Newmar". Yeesh! This is even worse than people who attribute characters' quotes to the author directly.

  3. No big deal here by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    We've known for almost a hundred years (since Poincare more or less) that the 3 body problem is inherently chaotic and not terribly stable and here we have an n body problem for large n. All they seem to have done here is list some of the more catastrophic possible outcomes if the system becomes seriously unstable.

    1. Re:No big deal here by mrsquid0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, this result is a big deal. First, the authors used powerful new techniques to solve some long-standing problems in these sorts of simulations. This has allowed them to run simulations far further into the future (or the past) than was possible before. Second, they included General Relativity and the affects of planetary satellites in their calculations, which improves the precision of their results. This has not been done before. Third, this work is the first to put a quantitative time scale on instability in the inner Solar System. Up until now we knew that the orbits of the inner planets were unstable, but we had no idea how long it would take for those instabilities to lead to major changes in orbital parameters. Finally, this result has profound implications for the stability of planetary systems in general, which affects the probability of their being Earth-like planets around other stars, and thus the chances of there being animal life out there. This is a major paper and may become the baseline for this entire sub-field. It certainly deserved to be published in Nature. It is too bad that the media chose to glom onto the sensationalist aspects of the story.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    2. Re:No big deal here by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But I don't see this as as big enough a deal to justify a Slashdot article.

      You are perfectly free, on the internets, to not read anything that doesn't interest you. If you're a logical, rational person, you don't, and you certainly don't go on to comment on those pages that don't interest you telling the people who post them that they shouldn't have since they don't interest you. Amazingly, you are not, in fact, the center of the universe. Whether you personally find something interesting or significant has no bearing on whether other people should or shouldn't post it.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  4. whats up woth bbc today by ionix5891 · · Score: 4, Funny

    first they announce that the recession is over in the UK (yeh right!)

    then we find out earth is about to collide with another planet

    at least the later is more believable :D

  5. Re:Yeah... And there's also a small chance... by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next up.. How to make a tinfoil hat that can stop the CIA's mind control rays.

    You have my undivided attention.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  6. This new science is getting scary by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's go back to crystalline spheres and immutable heavens. That was a much safer design model

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:This new science is getting scary by Zarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's go back to crystalline spheres and immutable heavens. That was a much safer design model

      Sadly we weren't using version control back then and our backups have been lost. It looks like we can't revert to the last stable version so we will have to find a way to make the current system stable until we can upgrade to Universe 2.0.

      --
      [signature]
  7. Worlds collide! by baKanale · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're killing independent George!

  8. Re:Never mind by impaledsunset · · Score: 2, Funny

    And no need to switch to 128bit timestamp when the Earth is no more. What a relief.

  9. Re:I thought we all agreed that the French... by Rashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Give a geek a model, and he'll fret for a day. Teach a geek to model, and he'll have major news media fretting forever...

    There, fixed that for you. Because:
    Give a man a model, and he'll have a great time with her.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  10. Plus a billion, minus a billion by starglider29a · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, here's a question: Has this happened in the past?

    It doesn't take long playing with simple, fun orbit simulators to see that while most planetesimals get glommed, a few get chucked. Escape velocity from the Sun at Mars distance is WAY MORE* (technological term) than Jupiter could perturb. Some things tossed could have 'very long' periods, but still not escape. THAT would be news.

    And yes, I am a rocket scientist and yes, I HAVE done the math.

    Vcircular * sqrt(2) = Vescape! 41% is too much, even for Jupiter.

    1. Re:Plus a billion, minus a billion by starglider29a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder what Slashdot would have said about Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and the Cosmological Constant when those ideas were first burgeoning. And from a PATENT CLERK, no less.

  11. Movie Promotion? by snooz_crash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the movie remake of When Worlds Collide due out in 2010, a story like this would be one way to create a buzz.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0455856/

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig
  12. Re:I am sick of pop science by Nimey · · Score: 3, Informative

    How do you know this is the fault of the scientists? It could very easily be lazy and/or sensationalistic journalism -- same stuff as "this has as much info as x libraries of congress" or "as much volume as x ping-pong balls", or half of what kdawson posts.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  13. Re:I'm no physicist ... by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Think of it in terms of two cars colliding head-on, literally on a planetary scale: the planetary crust that seems like solid rock to you on the human scale is more like the crumple zone of a car's frame. When the planets collide, they would buckle and fuse together. In the example of 2 cars colliding, there would likely be some rebound and the cars would come to rest a few feet apart (the cars' respective centres of gravity are insignificant compared to the forces of friction on the pavement). On the planetary scale, what's left of the planets' respective centres of gravity would continue to pull & keep them together (with a relatively small percentage of debris lost, most of that would then be recaptured into orbit for the immediate future).

    --
    When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
  14. there's a tiny chance by Tiber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that the earth may simply stop existing because if it's quantum state. This applies to the universe as well.

    This is why this isn't news.

  15. This reminds me of a story.. by MaerD · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a student dozing off in a class in college and the professor makes the remark that the Sun will one day go out, but this will probably not happen for at least a billion years.

    The student wakes up suddenly with a panicked look and asks the professor to repeat his statement.
    The professor does so, and the student says "Whew. I thought you said a million years."


    I can't seem to bring myself to worry, either way.

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat..
  16. I doubt they're that accurate by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if they can somehow account for every small asteroid that will change the course of Earth's orbit over a billion years, they can't possibly account for the possibility (near-certainty unless we nuke ourselves to death) that we will, possibly before the end of this century, be able to cause drastic changes to anything in the solar system.

  17. It probably happened to Earth. by Myria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The current theory is that a Mars-sized planet collided with Earth sometime in history. When this planet, usually named Theia, collided with Earth, some of the disturbed matter from both planets got ejected into space, some fell onto and became part of Earth, and some got caught in orbit around Earth as natural satellites.

    The resulting dust either escaped or eventually coalesced into the modern Earth and Moon.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  18. Re:Damned Scientists by julesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why can't they come up with a plausible theory of apocalypse by snu-snu?

    Unfortunately, it seems, the world ends not with a bang but a whimper.

  19. Re:Its not what happens in 5 Gyr... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Jupiter like planet has been catapulted out of another solar system and is planning a visit... Latest calculations predict collision with Earth somewhere at the end of 2012.

    "The year, 1994. From out of space, comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction. Man's civilization is cast in ruin.

    "Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn. A strange new world rises from the old. A world of savagery, super-science, and sorcery.

    "But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice. With his companions, Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword, against the forces of evil. He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!"

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  20. Prediction is meaningless by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2, Informative

    This prediction is as meaningless as the one of Mercury falling into the sun in a billion years for the same reasons.

    The inner solar system is chaotic with a Lyuapanov time on the order of 5 million years - On average, two very nearby orbits will change their distance between each other in phase-space by a constant in that time. This makes the solar system's future evolution profoundly dependent on initial conditions and integrator accuracy.

    First of all it's hard to maintain integration accuracy for more than a few Lyuapanov times, especially when the system has such an enormous dynamic range in mass and characteristic orbital times as the solar system, since this requires that the integrator be exponentially more accurate. The outer solar system is routinely integrated for hundreds of millions of years (and I've run several such simulations myself with a 10th order symplectic integrator) but most simulations of the inner solar system run for a few tens of millions of years at most. A 5 billion year integration of the inner solar system will require that errors be supressed on the order of e^-1000, which is absurd.

    Second of all, chaotic systems are also defined by their extreme dependence on initial conditions. Our observational knowledge of the positions of the planets only extends to about 7 digits at best, which makes any simulation in which displacing something by 1 part in e^1000 changes the outcome meaningless. In addition, at such levels of precision other effects come into play - Relativity changes the details of Earth's orbit significantly from the classical prediction after about 10 million years.

    You can plug whatever numbers you want into a symplectic integrator and it'll run as long as you want without blowing up, but that doesn't mean the numbers mean anything.