Slashdot Mirror


Senator Applauds Pirate Bay Trial, Chides Canada

eldavojohn writes "Republican Senator Orrin Hatch spoke Tuesday at the World Copyright Summit in Washington DC and hailed the Pirate Bay guilty verdict as an important victory. He expressed severe disappointment in Canada for showing up on our watch list for piracy next to China and Russia. Senator Hatch also said, 'In fact, one study reports that each year, copyright piracy from motion pictures, sound recordings, business and entertainment software, and video games costs the US economy $58 billion in total output, costs American workers 373,375 jobs and $16.3 billion in earnings, and costs federal, state, and local governments $2.6 billion in tax revenue. During this time of economic turmoil, we must ensure that all copyrighted works, both here and abroad, are protected from online theft and traditional physical piracy. After all, US copyright-based industries continue to be one of America's largest and fastest-growing economic sectors.' GamePolitics notes that for his 2006 campaign, Hatch was rented for $7,000 by the RIAA and also got on his knees for $12,640 from the MPAA."

112 of 526 comments (clear)

  1. Not a Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If someone download a movie, game or song doesn't mean they would have paid for it if they couldn't. So those loss calculations are wrong

    1. Re:Not a Loss by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this does need to be said, over and over again. just to counter the 'think of our lost sales!' woes.

      in fact, you can't know what the net effect is of non-paid non-authorized downloads.

      it does cut into a percentage of sales.

      it also ENCOURAGES a percentage of sales.

      some people would pay for the movie/music if at the right price, so this factor in the equation is a 'conditional' and not any kind of linear term.

      there are MANY complex issues that would formulate the net gain or loss due to 'downloading'. anyone who says they have a reliable model for predicting the loss is, well, full of shit.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Not a Loss by twidarkling · · Score: 5, Informative

      So if Terminator 4 was downloaded 1million times in the US, one could say that it cost the $18million ($18 for the DVD) plus the government $1,260,000 in taxes (assuming 7% taxes).

      Okay, I *saw* terminator 4 in theatres, and lemme tell you, it was NOT worth the price. If a friend hadn't bought my ticket, I wouldn't have watched it. But to my friend, it was worth the price because we were seeing it together. That's the difference. He was getting a value out of it separate to the value of the movie.

      To me, the best pro-piracy argument is it allows people to not reward people for making shit products. If piracy wasn't available, I'd have to pay $60 to find out that new game is absolute ass-nuggets, I'd have to pay at least $10 to see a movie in the theatres to know it was crap, not including travel time, waiting time, concessions, etc. Why should someone benefit from my enforced inability to check the quality of their product before I shell out full price? You can't tell me you've never watched a movie, or played a game, or bought a book, or *something* that made you go, afterwards, "fuck, that was a waste of $X. I wish I had that back."

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    3. Re:Not a Loss by SomeJoel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this any different from you walking into a supermarket and saying, "this steak isn't worth $12, I'm going to shoplift it and eat it anyhow."

      Well, in that case, nobody else is able to pay for and eat the $12 steak. Copying a movie does not reduce anyone else's ability to pay for the same movie.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    4. Re:Not a Loss by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, the best pro-piracy argument is it allows people to not reward people for making shit products. If piracy wasn't available, I'd have to pay $60 to find out that new game is absolute ass-nuggets, I'd have to pay at least $10 to see a movie in the theatres to know it was crap, not including travel time, waiting time, concessions, etc. Why should someone benefit from my enforced inability to check the quality of their product before I shell out full price? You can't tell me you've never watched a movie, or played a game, or bought a book, or *something* that made you go, afterwards, "fuck, that was a waste of $X. I wish I had that back."

      That's the free market, you vote with your dollars. If a company burns you with a shit product, stop buying their products.

      People like you constantly try to come up with reasons and justifications for breaking the law rather than attempting to sway the minds of people to get the law changed. Civil disobedience only works when there's an audience. Frankly your audience is just yourselves and individuals who you aren't going to sway.

      Oh, but the MPAA and RIAA don't pay the artists crap for producing their crap so I'm just going to pirate the movie and music.
      Oh, the software has a demo, but I don't want to bother with that, I'm just going to pirate the full version.
      Oh, the computer game has a demo and tons of review, but I don't want to spend time reading the reviews or trying the demo, so I'm just going to pirate the full game instead.

      Let me guess, you agree that I should be able to take your money and distribute it however I please because I know how to better spend your money than you?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    5. Re:Not a Loss by dc29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is this thing call the internet that allows you to search for and find reviews of games, movies, and just about anything else you want.

      Yes because reviews are *NEVER* biased. How many stories we get regularly that X game site/magazine reviews are paid by the game publisher? Or how many reviews are forced to make a steaming shitpile of a game look good because game publisher would than withdraw ad funding (basically being bullied into good reviews)?

      When I can take a game/CD/DVD I bought and bring it back to the store for refund because it's a steaming pile of male cow feces, then I will never *EVER* download illegally anything.

    6. Re:Not a Loss by agbinfo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apologies accepted but in the future, please restrain this retard.

    7. Re:Not a Loss by easyTree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is this thing call the internet that allows you to search for and find reviews of games, movies, and just about anything else you want, written by people who were paid to write favourable reviews.

      Time to roll out the tired, old 'there, fixed that for you' meme, once again...

    8. Re:Not a Loss by gilgongo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you can't know what the net effect is of non-paid non-authorized downloads

      Here's a true story:

      When my son was 6, his friends showed him an Indiana Jones Lego kit and he really liked it. After a while I realised he'd never seen the films and without much thought I downloaded one and showed it to him just to see what he thought (he's fickle). He loved it. So much so that we've probably spend about $200 on Indie merchandising of various kinds in the last 18 months, and still buying. He may never had got to that level had he not seen the film, and I may well not have been bothered to buy/rent it for him.

      Of course, the marketing behemoth of Indian Jones Inc, may well have hoovered him up eventually, but who's to say he might not have gone for something else, something smaller - Japanimation or whatever?

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    9. Re:Not a Loss by gilgongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People like you constantly try to come up with reasons and justifications for breaking the law rather than attempting to sway the minds of people to get the law changed. Civil disobedience only works when there's an audience. Frankly your audience is just yourselves and individuals who you aren't going to sway.

      Oh, but the MPAA and RIAA don't pay the artists crap for producing their crap so I'm just going to pirate the movie and music.
      Oh, the software has a demo, but I don't want to bother with that, I'm just going to pirate the full version.
      Oh, the computer game has a demo and tons of review, but I don't want to spend time reading the reviews or trying the demo, so I'm just going to pirate the full game instead.

      Let me guess, you agree that I should be able to take your money and distribute it however I please because I know how to better spend your money than you?

      That doesn't make any sense. The whole point here is that there IS an audience - it's the *AA. If they weren't feeling the pain, they wouldn't be doing what they're doing. The "Oh, but..." stuff you list is EXACTLY how the law will get changed eventually, because that's how modern democratic societies work. Sure the *AA will kick and scream, but once the tide has turned, it's over.

      By 2100, copyright as we know it will have been abolished. That sounds impossible, but it's going to happen.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  2. American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe he admitted it. "After all, US copyright-based industries continue to be one of America's largest and fastest-growing economic sectors."

    Next thing you know he'll say, "And if they won't buy our opium, we will sail our ironclads right into their harbours and open up their markets, whether they like it or not."

    1. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He's more right than he probably knows. Even the design and engineering seem to be on a rapid decline, leaving copyright law and patent portfolios the only remaining American stronghold. People don't seem to grasp that it isn't sustainable. When the only thing you're left with is lawyers, you have a very serious problem.

    2. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, I've got it. We'll push the idea of futures in the entertainment market. Hatch, being a Republican, will break his neck trying to push for that kind of deregulation. After 6 years of people blowing countless billion on potential albums and movies the entire market implodes. Two birds with one stone.

    3. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More specifically, the problem with intangible goods is that they only have the value because the law creates an artificial scarcity. The only incentive for a foreign nation to respect the legal framework that makes our intangible goods scarce is the threat of reprisal. This reprisal can come in the form of a trade barrier, but when we're left with only intangible exports, the threat of a trade barrier really has no teeth.

      The other reprisal, of course, is military. I'm deeply afraid that we'll end up using force to bully other nations into giving our intangible goods value. We all know how that game ends.

    4. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why can't you believe that he "admitted" that it is in the economic interests of the United States to ensure that its copyright-based industries continue to develop? He is a Senator. His job is to identify and protect the interests of the citizens of the United States.

      See here's where the problem lies.

      Copyrights aren't owned by citizens with short lifespans anymore.

      Do not kid yourself. They are not looking out for the citizens interests, they are looking out for the interests of "Corporate Amerika".

      Corporations are not beholden to anyone other than the stock holders and even then they typically have no moral compass.

      They lobby to protect their interests, legislate to preserve antiquated business models, and continue to try and apply physical property rights to digital information.

      Information which can be perfectly duplicated with no detriment to the original source. Supply and Demand does not apply when supply is effectively infinite.

      I try to put myself in the shoes of the "content owner", but really have a hard time of it. Throughout antiquity, musicians and artists have been paid either by private parties commissioning work, or through public performance. Its only been a fairly recent development (last 100-200 years) that artists could expect to produce for a period of time and then live off the royalties or have their music be a source of perpetual income. Frankly I think copyrights have gotten out of hand. The idea that someone owns a string of notes in perpetuity is absurd. Its like a patent on a business model.

    5. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      they only have the value because the law creates an artificial scarcity.

      They have value, but the entire value (and cost) is in the creation of the first instance of that thing. Every subsequent instance (copy) can be made for $0 cost. Because of that, it's nearly impossible to make a profit by amortizing the cost of creating that thing over the sale of multiple instances of that thing. IP law attempts to create artificial scarcity (prohibiting $0 copies) such that a person or company can amortize the creation cost over multiple sales, but we are seeing that artificial scarcity fail time and time again.

      The problem with this whole scheme is: what happens when a company can no longer cover the cost of creation of the first instance of that thing (i.e., paying the creator or designer a reasonable salary or wage)? The answer is that we lose that thing from having been created. Some sort of new business model needs to be developed to support profitable creation of non-tangible goods. IP/Copyright law isn't cutting it.

  3. makes me proud to be a canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets face it,

    If as a society you are pissing off a modern US Republican, you have to be doing something right.

    1. Re:makes me proud to be a canadian by Faulkner39 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doing something right would piss off a US Democrat, doing something left would get you mad mod points on slashdot.

    2. Re:makes me proud to be a canadian by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm no Republican, and I happen to hate the party. But, I do find it amazing that an AC making a fairly uninteresting anti-Republican comment can be modded up so quickly. Are you people so anxious to show off our political viewpoint? Are you not aware that liberals have been just as guilty of courting the RIAA and MPAA and conservatives? Who can remember Senator Disney?

  4. $58 billion saved! by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's an incredible saving. That money can be used to fix broken windows everywhere.

  5. Yeah Canada by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 5, Funny

    How dare you give your citizens freedom.

  6. $58 billion? by Quantus347 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where exactly did he get his numbers? I wonder?

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
    1. Re:$58 billion? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Either from the RIAA/MPAA, or from Verizon.

      In both cases the numbers are meaningless.

    2. Re:$58 billion? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Where exactly did he get his numbers? I wonder?

      I believe he was citing the Business Software Alliance's annual report on piracy. Although that value I believe is for world-wide losses, not American.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:$58 billion? by localman57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      'In fact, one study reports that each year, copyright piracy from motion pictures, sound recordings, business and entertainment software, and video games costs the US economy $58 billion in total output, costs American workers 373,375 jobs and $16.3 billion in earnings, and costs federal, state, and local governments $2.6 billion in tax revenue.

      I wonder if this number includes the economic benefits gained from people buying extra hard drives, spindles of DVD-Rs, and upgrading their broadband connections to the fastest unlimited connections they can get? Simply looking at it as an economist, neither condemning nor condoning the action of pirating...

    4. Re:$58 billion? by Random2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      America IS the world. Duh.

      --
      "Our goal each year should be to increase the number of goals we set for ourselves!"
    5. Re:$58 billion? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where exactly did he get his numbers? I wonder?

      Well, when each song download is worth $200,000...

    6. Re:$58 billion? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well said. Kinda hard to feel bad for Media conglomerates when most of them own ISPs who are quite happy to advertise their wares in terms of "fast access to media".

      Somebody's making money, and it's not the pirates.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:$58 billion? by dk90406 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RIAA / MPAA? That number is even more absurd than the older numbers that Ars Technica analyzed recently: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/rep-howard-berman-calls-for-new-ip-law-using-dodgy-data.ars
      The job loss claim is ludicrous! 300.000+ jobs? How? Where? So if all download their stuff legally from then net that number of jobs will be created? Or does he expect that CD and DVD stores will spring back to life in this digital age at the cost of LEGAL downloads?

  7. Who wants a treat? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Orrin Hatch (R-UT) once again was charming,
    informed, thoughtful and inspiring in his speech."

    Who's a good doggy? Who's a good doggy?
    You are aren't you! Have some kibble.

    1. Re:Who wants a treat? by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm afraid that analogy doesn't work for me: Puppies are cute. Orrin Hatch isn't.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  8. Re:Well... by spacefiddle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, i love how in business can you count "money we never got or even came close to seeing" as a "loss."

    This one time, i was in a convenience store, and i saw someone else had won a million dollars in a lottery. I didn't have an extra dollar on me for a lottery ticket at the time, since the public transit token machine ate one of my dollars. Ergo, PUBLIC TRANSIT COST ME A MILLION DOLLARS!!11!1

    oh wait, that 'extra' dollar would have gone to something useful with value to me... not a lottery ticket.

    /facepalm

  9. So the Senator is applauding corrupt trials... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure glad that he is a senator then. I would love to see how he would feel if he was convicted in a trial and it turned out that the Judge was a high ranking member of the puppeteers of the prosecutor. Talk about trying to stack the deck. I know lets make sure the Judge is on our side and already believes us, that will make it much easier to make sure the outcome is the one we want.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  10. Blame Canada by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Informative

    I suppose it would be a waste of time to explain to this genius that the "problem" of file sharing in Canada is largely a myth and has been discredited.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    1. Re:Blame Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suppose it would be a waste of time to explain to this genius that the "problem" of file sharing in Canada is largely a myth [canada.com] and has been discredited [www.cbc.ca].

      For anyone too lazy to read the helpful link provided by the parent, basically it boils down that they didn't do any actual measurements in Canada, they extrapolated based on what their (flawed) statistical model indicated should be their projected piracy rates.

      There is no evidence (real or otherwise) that piracy in Canada happens at anywhere near the rate they pulled out of their backsides.

  11. Wrong by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, Orrin. Just an FYI - those numbers have been proven wrong, on numerous occasions by numerous sources. And not wrong in the "close but not quite accurate" sense - wrong as in "so far off from any vague hint of accuracy as to be laughable." You keep quoting numbers that are being fed to you by the MPAA and RIAA and they're making you look stupid. You might want to have one of your staff members do a smidge of research so you don't look quite so idiotic. Oh, and when you spout off these incorrect numbers, it weakens any other point you may have by association. But, hey, you enjoy that new deck that the RIAA/MPAA donation allowed you to add to your country home.

  12. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Right whines and makes up numbers as scare tactics, and the Holy Left appoints the RIAA's attack dogs to run the justice department.

    I'm thinking it's time to move to Canada.

    1. Re:So by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why move to Canada whenever Sweden is going to have some pirates in office soon and has a public generally anti-copyright.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:So by skrolle2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the Pirate Party gained a seat in the EU parliament in Brussels, not in the Swedish parliament.

  13. RIAA Tax by Akido37 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait, I thought there was a special tax in Canada on blank media that the government just handed over to the RIAA-equivalent.

    1. Re:RIAA Tax by Jester998 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is, but little-to-none of it takes the form of kickbacks to US Senators, which is why he's all up in arms.

  14. Here's a little rhyme I copyrighted by xednieht · · Score: 4, Funny

    Orrin Hatch reminds of putrid old snatch. (C) 2009 all rights reserved

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  15. Some things the Senator needs to understand. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some things the Senator needs to understand:

    1/ Other countries are INDEPENDENT and the United States has no authority to dictate to them.

    2/ Industry funded studies designed to "prove" their viewpoint cannot be trusted.

    3/ Copyright under the U.S. Constitution was not intended to be eternal. It was supposed to be for a limited time and I suspect that "limited" was meant in compared to the human life span not compared to eternity.

    3/ The DMCA is bad law and should be repealed rather than encouraging others to implement the same

    1. Re:Some things the Senator needs to understand. by gringofrijolero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Other countries are INDEPENDENT and the United States has no authority to dictate to them.

      [citation needed]

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    2. Re:Some things the Senator needs to understand. by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some things the Senator needs to understand ...

      Might I remind you that this is the same Senator Orrin Hatch who

      Combine those first two points and I wager that your comment not only falls upon deaf ears but might instead cause him to laugh. This guy's got a long history and he's been very successful doing it.

      --
      My work here is dung.
  16. On that note by LSDelirious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is estimated that the US printing industry lost Eleventy Billion Dollars in book sales last year from all those freeloading bastards reading at their local public library, which also contributed to heavy losses in the paper manufacturing industry....

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
  17. False statistics by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been thoroughly debunked by Professor Michael Geist a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law.

    1. Re:False statistics by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there can't BE piracy in canada. they have blank media taxes and all that groovy kinda stuff.

      ie, their citizens have paid for the so-called crime, 'ahead of time'. to any reasonable person, if you are pre-charging me for something, I'm assuming that its ok to HAVE the thing you just charged me for.

      even buying blank cdr's that could be used for non-entertainment data (amazing, huh?) - you have to pay the media taxes.

      seems like piracy is already nulified since the goods have been paid for (not even willingly since you can't easy get your taxes back by demonstrating you are NOT copying music/movies to the media).

      can't have it both ways, media companies. you got your 'music tax' in canada and so you can't call ANYONE there a criminal. not now.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  18. Just to dispel any confusion. by BabyDuckHat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, I live in Utah.
    Yes, I am Mormon.
    Yes, I really dislike Orin Hatch.

  19. damn Democrats, whores to Hollywood! by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...oh, wait. This Orrin Hatch, who.voted for the DMCA along with the rest of the Gopasaurs. Both parties suck on IP issues.

    1. Re:damn Democrats, whores to Hollywood! by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sonny Bono, Hatch, both parties? There is only one party.

      They are Legion, they are many.

      I see little difference between Clinton, Bush, Obama, Carter, etc.

      I see 1 party. The "Goverment as a Business" party whom we shall now refer to as the GAAB party comprising two idealogies:

      Left: The Goverment Controls Business
      Right: Business Control the Goverment

      but either way THEY CONTROL YOU.

      Seriously this partisan nonsense has to end, neither party has shown any credibitity in over 80 years and have done nothing for the nation as a whole, rather they have done plenty for themselves.

      When the USA stopped making real things and moved to a service economy the only thing we have left is our imaginary property that was long ago only supposed to be protected for 7 years has turned into a generation spanning con game with society at large losing in the end.

      Now as that society rebels watch carefully as the GAABs show their true colors.

      It is modern Feudalism with Goverment as the King and the large corporations as the fiefs. It's employees are the pesants\cattle and we can see the bloodlines clear as day now in both the Corporate spheres as well as in the media.

      I will coin a term if it hasn't already:

      The United States form of goverment is "Corporate Feudalism"

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  20. Lack of Understanding of Economics? by jayme0227 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, maybe I'm not the brightest bulb on the tree, but if Americans aren't spending money on mp3s and downloaded movies, aren't they instead spending that money elsewhere? We have one of the lowest savings rates in the world, so it's not like the money is disappearing into our savings accounts. Therefore, downloading content on the internet should theoretically cost the economy $0 and $0 jobs, or at least considerably less than the figures quoted in the article, and instead create new jobs in other sectors rather than lining the pockets of movie execs. Then again, this whole philosophy is moot if nobodyâ(TM)s following the Pirates Code of Honor and buying content that is actually good.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    1. Re:Lack of Understanding of Economics? by visible.frylock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh no, of course not. Americans have one of the highest per capita savings rates in the world. Right now, instead of paying for music and movies, they're saving that money for their retirement.

      --
      Billy Brown rides on. Yolanda Green bypasses Gary White.
  21. Orin Hatch doesn't understand the law by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The crux of the problem with "the pirate bay convictions" is that they aren't being properly tried under local law. The fact that they had their stuff seized and then returned to them should have been indication enough that the problem isn't with the pirate bay's activities, but with the local laws. Their present conviction is quite wrongful.

    Hatch rather reminds me of my ex-wife who believed that anything that made her angry must be against the law and so was inclined to call the police to resolve it. Hatch, of course, is one of the bought and paid for politicians and I simply can't believe anyone is taking him seriously any more... well okay, I can believe it simply because the general masses still don't get what is wrong with current copyright law and process... and definitely don't get that different countries have different ideals and standards of law.

    I would have been an interesting turn of things if the U.S.S.R. was able to peddle its influence to have other nations change their laws the way the U.S. does. And outside of the U.S. I am fairly certain that the practice is both unappreciated and unwelcome. It is probably one of the larger reasons the U.S. is presently disliked in the world.

    1. Re:Orin Hatch doesn't understand the law by jonaskoelker · · Score: 3, Funny

      And outside of the U.S. I am fairly certain that the practice is both unappreciated and unwelcome. It is probably one of the larger reasons the U.S. is presently disliked in the world.

      Quite on the contrary!

      I think it's commendable for GWB to go to such great lengths to give democracy, rule of law and civil liberties to the Iraqi people.

      I think it's especially noble of him, considering how he had to sacrifice those of his own people.

      Could you imagine anything more noble than to give up what you value the most (it's in the constitution), such that not your friend, but your long time enemy could have them for himself.

      Jesus would be proud of this man, as should every US citizen!

  22. I know $19k sounds like a lot of money... by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but it's a drop in the bucket in a senate election. So while I am just as annoyed at Senator Hatch as the next geek, I think accusing him of being bought is probably tactically stupid. First, because it's probably not true. Second, because there's probably another reason he holds this particular position. And third, because he probably actually believes what he's saying.

    There are two ways to get him to stop being such a powerful advocate for copyright interests. One is to get him replaced. The other is to get him to change his mind. Getting him replaced is going to be really, really hard. But by all means, go for it. Only I really doubt the average Utahn is going to vote him out on the basis of his position on copyright, even if they disagree with him. So that's a really big job.

    The other possibility is that you could get him to come around to seeing how much economic damage the RIAA and MPAA positions are doing to our economy. I think that's pretty hard too. But maybe not impossible. But one thing that is impossible is that you will get him to even listen to you if you start talking about how he's blowing the MPAA to get campaign contributions. The electoral system works the way it works. I want it to change as much as you do. But it's not going to change because you make nasty accusations. It's going to change because you work for it, or not at all.

    1. Re:I know $19k sounds like a lot of money... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The other possibility is that you could get him to come around to seeing how much economic damage the RIAA and MPAA positions are doing to our economy.

      Part of the problem comes from how you think about economics. Some people think, "whatever is very most profitable for the most businesses," is the definition of "good for the economy". Those companies can then hire more people, invest in things, etc. This seems to be the way Hatch is seeing things, and it's not at all uncommon, even among Democrats.

      On the other hand, you might say, "greater efficiency is better for the economy." Cut down on all the red-tape, bureaucracy, and middlemen and it will free up more real wealth to be spent on things that are actually beneficial. You can think of it like a forest fire. We used to prevent small forest fires because they were dangerous, but then we found out that smaller forest fires clear out some excess growth, fertilize the soil, and prevent the next forest fire from getting too out of control. Similarly, allowing some economic destruction can clear out bad business models, free up capital for better investments, and prevent economic downturns from getting quite so ugly.

      Now if you're a believer in the second idea, then you might not be all that interested in protecting our entertainment industry, regardless of how much money they're making. Online distribution means much less waste. There's no packaging, no transportation costs, no storage/shelving costs, and no waste of unsold products. It's a much more efficient model, which is an economic boon whether or not these particular businesses can figure out how to profit from it.

      Either way, I'm a bit uneasy about the implication that our economy is reliant on our entertainment industry. It'd be nice if our economy was built on actual production of goods, and not on copyright enforcement.

  23. Is Hatch a capitalist or aristocrat? by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    People complain that we are going socialist, but how long has Hatch been in office, and how long has he been shouting these socialist ideals. Sure someone, somewhere might be losing all that money, but who cares! Look at how much money Chrysler lost, Than god we live a more or less capitalist economy, so even though they could take away tax money to throw after bad, at least Hatch did not have the power to force me to buy an American Car, though by his statements I am sure he would have wanted to.

    If someone is losing money, it is not because someone else is stealing it. It is because the product is not competitive. If an album is not selling, it is not because of piracy, it is because it is not competitive. Either enough money has not been spent on marketing, or it is priced too high, or it is too hard to get. How many of us pay more to get milk from the corner store. How many of us would pay that same high price at the big grocery stores. Recorded music still has value, just not the value it did. I am sure Mr. Hatch is confused to why a audio tape manufacturers are not making as much as they did, and probably wanted to a bailout to help them. Under his logic, I could build a fishing pole, sell it for a while, then make it more expensive or reduce the quality, then claim that pirates have stolen my design and I need the feds help.

    Although economics is not a zero sum game, one person does sometimes get rich at the expense of another, or at least that is the perception. The music industry is currently in an uproar that it cannot extort more money from the radio stations. Sure the music industry provides the raw materials, but it is the radio station that adds value. What I would like to see an end to compulsory licensing. They could use a bid based system, you know, we will play you album on the station only if you charge this much and no more. Oh, you want the money you used to get, won't happen. Not in a capitalist market.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Is Hatch a capitalist or aristocrat? by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Informative

      these socialist ideals

      Where the heck did you get the idea that the ideas Sen Hatch was espousing were socialist? They aren't: Socialism advocates the collective ownership of property, which in the world of so-called intellectual property would be something along the lines of Creative Commons.

      No, the word you might have been looking for was "fascist", "corporatist", or "plutocratic".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  24. Bad Science by nickovs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As ever, the media companies are deploying insupportable statistics. Most of the numbers for 'lost revenue' are coming form multiplying 'estimates' for the number of files shared by the recommended retail price of the shared item, which makes the huge leap of believing that every single download that the RIAA thinks happened represents a lost sale that otherwise would have taken place. This assumption is not only naive but studies have shown that people who download music for free also buy more music. In the UK the government is basing policies on similarly erroneous information bought and paid for by the media companies. In that particular case the 'academic study' got it's numbers for lost revenue from an industry press release...

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  25. Re:Well... by Divebus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, that's nothing. Think how much money this "Fair Use" nonsense has cost the industry.

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
  26. As always follow the money....... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Orrin Hatch has taken over $96,000 From the TV/Movies/Music lobby already.

  27. Addendum by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a snippet from the blog cited above...

    ...it would be worth reminding U.S. officials that Canada is compliant with its international copyright obligations. In recent years, it responded to U.S. pressure by becoming one of the few countries to enact anti-camcording legislation. The RCMP has prioritized intellectual property cases and the law contains tough statutory damages provisions that are regularly used by rights holders to obtain significant judgments. In fact, some of Canada's copyright rules are more restrictive than those found south of the border.

    Moreover, grouping Canada together with high-piracy nations does not stand up to even mild scrutiny. The Business Software Alliance's 2008 statistics show that among the eleven other countries on this year's Priority Watch List for which data is available, the lowest rate of software piracy is 66 percent. By comparison, Canada stands at 32 percent, not remotely close to any other country on the list. In fact, Canada's software piracy rate is lower than all 46 countries named in the Special 301 report.

    Similarly, 2008 data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency on intellectual property seizures reports that Taiwan and South Korea rank fourth and fifth as sources of seized goods (China is number one), yet both were dropped this year from the Watch List. By comparison, Canada does not even appear in the rankings.

    [Canadian] Officials should not sit idly by as the U.S. unfairly tarnishes Canada's reputation.

  28. What "Buys" Hatch? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet it was the free Metallica tickets for life. Hatch rules the mosh pit.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  29. Re:OK republican shills by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

    start defending this idiot.

    Okay... uh... he works hard for the bribes the mafiaa pays him. You can't accuse him of not delivering.

  30. don't forget Hatch was chair of Judiciary Committe by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...so this is even more pathetic. But then this is the same Hatch that helped block 60 of Clintons judicial nominees, only to have his party threaten to blow up the Senate if the Democrats didn't give an "upordown" vote for all of Bushs nominees. Now of course that a Dem is back in the White House, the GOP is threatening to filibuster Obamas picks before he's even made them.

  31. "373,375 jobs" Each year? Big fucking deal by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've lost 1 million jobs each month due to our corporate and government corruption (same damn thing if you ask me).

    We cant be a nation of film makers and muscians. Its not going to float this sinking economy. The real problem is greed, corruption, outsourcing, our law makers bending over backwards for those that would sell out America at every opportunity.

    Downloading a shitty movie here and there that still makes 200 million in profit, is not costing us that much.

    There are far bigger problems, and i find it hysterical that Oren Hatch (who is part of the problem) is acting as if some how the pirate bay is more significant than health care or the economy.

    Perhaps more people are pirating stuff because they can no longer afford to LIVE in the country Oren Hatch supposedly represents. Thanks Oren you fucking tool.

    Every one of these politicians live like kings in these "tough economic times"

    Give me a break. Fuck off and DO SOMETHING FOR THE PEOPLE FOR ONCE!!!!!!

  32. Re:Well... by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    blame darpa... they invented the interwebs of piracy

    So it's all Al Gore's fault?

  33. "In this troubled economy..." by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good god. #1 The banks and investment firms that didn't get involved in the mortgage backed securities nonsense are doing JUST FINE. And it appears that the real problem is the phony money that is being made in the markets. If the U.S. had the same strong manufacturing base that we once had, we would not be nearly as affected as we have been. All of our manufacturing is sent overseas and now our value is is based on how much money we move around. And when the markets crash, the value of our money crashes right along with it. So then what do we have to rebuild with? Not much. That's why we are seeing cars of all types being sold at 50% or more off MSRP today.

    And here's the kicker -- we know what the causes are and have been. Nothing has been done to prevent it from happening again. They want to prop things back up and get back to partying like it was 1999.

  34. Re:OK republican shills by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In all the brouhaha from the payout, to wall street vs main, TARP, GM, Chryseler, Sotamayor, and great big plans for the new Health care... if the Republicans couldn't find something to take a stand on, anything ... then they deserve what they get. Outvoted and silenced. I find it odd, from news a few weeks back that the recognized "voice of the Republican party" is Rush Limbaugh; and Mr. Limbaugh is a self-proclaimed "non-party" conservative. Is there is point in defending Republicans? Sadly, they are leaderless, clueless, and helpless. I have faith in conservatism, but no faith in Republicans to bring about conservatism.

  35. The good senator... by uffe_nordholm · · Score: 2

    The good senator may have missed a few points about the Pirate Bay trial.

    Firstly, the guilty verdict has been appealed. I don't think we are likely to see the Swedish Supreme Court pass sentence for a good many years yet. And before the Supreme Court hands out a sentence, I don't think you should consider the matter settled. In fact, even after the Swedish Supreme Court, the accused might appeal to the European court (I'm not sure they have the legal possibility, but they might, and if so I think they will take it).

    Secondly, the judge is suspected of being biased, and because of this the trial might be declared invalid. The reason this suspicion has arisen is that the judge is a member of two organisations whose purpose it is to strengthen copyright and/or trademark (or similar) protection. Among the other members of at least one of these organisations are the legal representatives for the plaintiffs.

    If the trial is declared void, it might be a few years before we get a sentence again.

  36. The made up statistics of the BSA by TropicalCoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Prof. Michael Geist's blog BSA Admits Canadian Software Piracy Rates Estimated; Canada Viewed as Low Piracy Country, the following shows that these statistics are just made up...

    This year the BSA reported that Canada declined from 33 to 32 percent. Michael Murphy, chair of the BSA Canada Committee claimed that "despite the slight decline, Canada's software piracy rate is nowhere near where it should be compared to other advanced economy countries. We stand a better chance of reducing it significantly with stronger copyright legislation that strikes the appropriate balance between the rights of consumers and copyright holders."

    Yet what the BSA did not disclose is that the 2009 report on Canada were guesses since Canadian firms and users were not surveyed. While the study makes seemingly authoritative claims about the state of Canadian piracy, the reality is that IDC, which conducts the study for BSA, did not bother to survey in Canada.

    1. Re:The made up statistics of the BSA by twidarkling · · Score: 4, Informative

      *facepalm*

      "We're just going to completely make shit up, 'cause we can't be bothered to survey Canada. They're just like the US, right? We'll just use the numbers from the US, adjusted for population, and how backwards they are compared to us."

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  37. Piracy cost more than thier revenue? Wait what? by MasseKid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A quick google search will land you at a link to http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_32/b4045001.htm That article, while talking about pets, states "Americans spend on the movies ($10.8 billion), playing video games ($11.6 billion), and listening to recorded music ($10.6 billion) combined"

    So according to the RIAA and MPAA we spend 33 billion on movies, video games, and music combined but some how piracy is costing the American economy almost twice what it actually spent on that industry? I know they inflate numbers, but this is beyond hyperbole.

  38. Re:OK republican shills by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sadly, they are leaderless, clueless, and helpless.

    That's what people said about the Democrats before they were able to adopt "Hey, at least we're not Bush!" as their slogan.

  39. Re:Well... by fpgaprogrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought those studies put piracy on the wrong side of the balance sheet: that's 56 billions dollars saved; not a 56 billion dollar cost. 373,000 jobs lost? That's over 15 millions hours each week of free time to spend with children

  40. Re:It often is a loss, and here's why by grepya · · Score: 4, Informative

    In other news, unchecked air-breathing by the earth's entire population costs governments trillions of dollars of lost revenue, billions of air-accounting jobs and millions of death by old age.
      The free availability of air to anyone with the simple capability to just *SUCK IT IN* willy-nilly skews the whole thing wildly. We don't know what people would do if wanton free-for-all air-breathing weren't an option. It very well might be possible that the accounting and sale of air (by the gallons) would create huge revenues for government and private businesses. Again, we don't know because people can just... you know... inhale and exhale at will.

  41. Down the Hatch by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Informative
    Senator Hatch's position is no surprise. He's been a thorn on personal freedom's side for years, and a complete sellout to the media corporations. Would it surprise you to know that Orrin Hatch endorses having the computer industry build mandatory self-destruct mechanisms in computers, remote controlled by the RIAA?

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/930731/posts

  42. Blame the industry by SilverJets · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I see a DVD screener of a movie that hasn't been released yet, exactly who is responsible? The industry. Obviously industry insiders are a bigger problem than these morons are willing to admit. Sure, point fingers at everyone else while your own people are stealing the revenue right out from under you.

  43. Re:Well... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take it a step farther, and think of how much money the record industry could make if they could just impose an arbitrary tax on all people! There are, what, 300 million people in the US? Assume each person really should be buying 10 albums a year (whether they want them or not) at $20 per CD, and the RIAA can pull down $60 billion a year. Think of how good that would be for the economy!

    I mean, if we're going to absolve the industry from having to provide a service that people want to pay for, then we may as well go in whole hog.

  44. Porno? by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    GamePolitics notes that for his 2006 campaign, Hatch was rented for $7,000 by the RIAA and also got on his knees for $12,640 from the MPAA."

    I think I speak for everyone when I ask "Did they film it?"

  45. Piracy costs jobs? by suffix+tree+monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that piracy can make someone think they lost money (it is disputable, but there's at least a bit of truth to that claim). However, I have yet to meet a person that was fired (or a company that went down) because the company's product was pirated too much. Naturally I'm not counting cases where the person in question leaked the product herself.

    1. Re:Piracy costs jobs? by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Consumer software can easily fall prey to this. Small software companies really can't afford it when their sales pretty much drop to zero unless they have other products.

      Piracy? Well, lets just call it agressive marketing via warez web sites offering the same or substantially similar products (from the same original publiser) at zero cost.

      The end result of a fairly massive warez-posting campaign where the distributors were using stolen credit cards to purchase products and then posting them for all to freely download was a virtual abandonment of the consumer space. There is no point in trying to market a product when it is being given away.

      Can you compete on support? Well, if it needs that much support nobody is going to use it anyway.

      Competing on doodads in the package? Well, if the whole idea is a downloaded product in the first place it is difficult to differentiate in this way.

      Making the product difficult to redistribute just makes it harder for those that are still paying, however few that might be.

      End result is the pirates win - they have a product they can give away, thus destroying any revenue that might be associated with it. No further development occurs on the product because nobody is going to pay the programmers to work on it. And if the "consumer product" programmers can't fit in to the other products they are out of a job. Sure, people lose their jobs because of piracy. But the pirates are winning the battle for zero-revenue (not necessarily free) software.

  46. 0-day release by Zedrick · · Score: 3, Funny

    Short .nfo:

    cracked by Zedrick in his 34th year of glory. Greetings to all old friends in the Amigascene! Note: Copyright-info removed to fit release in one sentence.

    "Orrin Hatch reminds of putrid old snatch."

  47. Re:OK republican shills by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Today's republicans are like democrats from 50 years ago, today's democrats are like liberals from 50 years ago, and today's liberals are like libertarians from 50 years ago. I myself prefer to be independent and back any good ideas and shun any bad ones.

    50 years from today, I imagine politics will still suck.

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  48. Not a Loss -- and other wrong things by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here are some thoughts about what the summary says:

    After all, US copyright-based industries continue to be one of America's largest and fastest-growing economic sectors

    Let's assume that if it's large, it's important. I guess that if something is important to you, the downfall of anything that opposes it is good. But even at the expense of sane legal systems in other countries? Maybe Orin Hatch should take a word from a party fellow, GWB, about ensuring democracy and Rule of Law in other countries ;-)

    costs the US economy $58 billion in total output, costs American workers 373,375 jobs and $16.3 billion in earnings, and costs federal, state, and local governments $2.6 billion in tax revenue.

    Let's see... the 16.3 billion dollars freed up by not having to be spent on music, I guess people just park them in their bank accounts---right? Or maybe people spend the money elsewhere, so that other people earn the same money (through jobs) and pay taxes off of them.

    This seems awfully hard to measure. I'm sure those who came up with the numbers did their due diligence and did this hard measurement, so that the $16.3e9 figure is the difference between money saved on music and money spent on other stuff.

    But I could be hopelessly naive ;-)

  49. Re:OK republican shills by cml4524 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, yes, the old "no true scotsman" argument. Standby of the man who's lost every rationale he ever had to defend what means the most to him.

    Republicans spent many years villifying anyone who dared to disagree with them on any issue while elevating filth such as Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck to spokespersons and role models for their movement.

    Republicans opened religious and geopolitical extremists with open arms which relegated all the moderates to Independence or pushed them into the democratic party. They elected a stuttering buffoon who drove the country deep into debt with nothing to show for it, destroyed our standing with the rest of the world as a beacon of hope and leadership, and forced a division of loyalties not seen in this country for nearly 50 years.

    For their troubles they've been pushed to the fringe by a reliably moderate majority of Americans who have had enough with their extremist views and tactics. Now the republicans are finding that fearmongering and hate only go so far before people get wise to those antics and reject them for more intelligent and useful ideas.

    The republicans made this bed. Now they can lie in it until they decide to clean up their act and start acting in a responsible and adult manner again. Or, they can die and let a more thoughtful and reasonable opposition to the democrats replace them. Either way, the republicans are what they are, and it's rapidly sending them to the abyss of irrelevance.

    All that said, democrats in this thread bashing Hatch because of the R next to his name would do well to remember that our democratic vice president is pretty friendly to the same people Hatch is, and our president is staffing key legal positions with ex-lawyers from the types of firms that would be more than happy to prosecute torrent users and hosters on American soil the way the Pirate Bay was tried.

  50. Traditional physical piracy?? by Time_Ngler · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...we must ensure that all copyrighted works, both here and abroad, are protected from online theft and traditional physical piracy."

    Yar, mateys... hoist the sails and get the cannons ready. A cargo ship containing 50,000 copies of High School Musical 3 is due to cross our path in a half hours time.

  51. Re:OK republican shills by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or the republicans can just wait for the democrats to f' it all up and have the pendulum swing back the other way.

    The problem is that anytime one side 'wins' they think it gives them 'a mandate' to push any and all of their policies regardless of how extremist they are. This inevitably always backfires and ends with the other party in power once again.

  52. Re:It often is a loss, and here's why by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard Bill Clinton doesn't inhale. Maybe they could use him as a case study...

  53. Re:OK republican shills by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Orrin Hatch is the same dumbass that 4 years ago proposed developing a way to destroy computers that illegally download music. Hatch has family connections to the RIAA, his kid did some legal work for them a while back. But perhaps his real reason for supporting stupid copyright laws is that he wants to make money as a singer-songwriter of Christian music.

    Orrin Hatch is routinely among the most annoying men in Washington, and that is saying something.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  54. Re:OK republican shills by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One could describe a significant portion of Republicans as Neo-statists rather than conservatives. There are very few true conservatives in Congress. I find it funny that libertarians many times dislike conservatives while not understanding the definition of true conservatism. The truth is that when it comes to the federal government there is no difference between a libertarian and a conservative, it is only once you drill down to state and local governments where differences begin to form.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  55. Re:Well... by squallbsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I personally believe that these piracy figures in the multi-billion dollar ranges are actually some sort of tax-evasion-scheme by RIAA/MPAA...

    --
    Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
  56. Re:It often is a loss, and here's why by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thuis is why you look at trends and otehr impacts.

    Is the entertainment still tracking higher then the economy in terms of revenue?
    And this is revenue, not profit.

    Meaning, the economy tanks 10% and the entertainment industry tanks 8% then it's not ding that bad.
    Does it also track with other consumer good reletive to history?

    When those factors are accounted for, then you will ahve an idea on how piracy is impacting the industry.

    Studies like that were done a few years ago, but the entertainment industry was doing better then expected. Other factors were leanng towards piracy helping sale by increasing word of mouth.

    Just looking at the last 10 years, it seems pretty clear that it is not having the impact they claim becasue there really wouldn't be any industry left.

    Economists and accountants know how to do this, it's not magic it just takes knowledge and smarts.
    The studies the trot out, to the best of my knowledge, have been extremely poor studies.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Re:OK republican shills by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    HOLD IT.

    President Bush signed TARP, the largest of the bailouts into law, long before the election.

    How is that Obama's fault?

    --
    It's been a long time.
  58. Re:OK republican shills by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree. And the funny thing is, when I was in high school, we were still taught the definition of "socialism", "conservatism", and "libertarian". Seems like that may have stopped happening a while ago. Or people are just being *gasp* deliberately obtuse about their true meanings just to support their own political views.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  59. Re:OK republican shills by Golddess · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is it libellous? Are you saying that being a Christian song writer is a bad thing and no one in their right mind would wish to have such a label applied to them?

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  60. Re:Well... by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Canada they did that.

    Which is why this is having such a hard time making file sharing illegal.

    And as for the politicians....Do you want to be the guy to say "Good news everyone, we're making it so the music industry can sue you for millions!"

    --
    It's been a long time.
  61. Re:It often is a loss, and here's why by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We don't know what people would do if piracy weren't an option. It very well might be possible that the sales of games and movies might be significantly higher.

    We don't know what people would do if piracy weren't an option. It very well might be that the sales of games and movies might be significantly lower.

    I'm not gonna say "fixed that for you" because it could be either your way or my way based on the evidence in your post. If you're going to say something like "we have no idea", you can't then posit that one thing "might very well be" without recognizing that the other thing could also very well be. If you think one way is more likely than the other, then you have to say why that is.

  62. Re:OK republican shills by code4fun · · Score: 2

    Just to be clear, Sen. Orrin does not represent every republican's view on this.

  63. Re:OK republican shills by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't even need to think about bribes. He's recorded an album, and fancies himself as an artist.

    Don't forget that this is the man who advocating being able to remotely *destroy* computers of *suspected* "pirates".

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  64. Re:OK republican shills by Curtman · · Score: 5, Informative

    He expressed severe disappointment in Canada for showing up on our watch list for piracy next to China and Russia.

    Well we express severe disappointment in the U.S. for showing up on our watch list for nations that are known to use torture along with Israel, China, Iran and Afghanistan.

  65. Re:OK republican shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but violating copyright is a far far worse crime than the mere use of extended interrogation techniques.

  66. 373,375 jobs by introspekt.i · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a lot of gaffers and grips.

  67. Re:OK republican shills by Buelldozer · · Score: 3, Informative

    HOLD IT.

    Unless my memory is faulty our CURRENT PRESIDENT voted for it himself...in his capacity as a United States Senator.

    Right there is how it's Obama's fault. He didn't try and stop it and actually voted FOR it.

    Also, please read the first paragraph of this link: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Economy/story?id=6654133&page=1

    Obama himself WANTED TARP and access to TARP money.

    All Bush did was sign it into law, it's the CONGRESS that made the program. In everyone's rush to BushBash they seem to forget how the U.S. Government actually works.

    Oh, and that same Congress that passed T.A.R.P. was majority DEMOCRAT!

    Isn't political bashing fun? It can go on all day...and not solve one god damned thing.

  68. Re:Well... by easyTree · · Score: 2, Insightful

    think of how much money the record industry could make if they could just impose an arbitrary tax on all people

    Uhh? you mean like the Canadian copyright levy on blank audio recording media ?

  69. Re:It often is a loss, and here's why by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then hopefully you are doing the responsible thing and boycotting their artists and not doing the selfish thing of downloading their material for free.

    --
    Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  70. Re:OK republican shills by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mark Twain considered himself to be a storyteller. And his works are all public domain now. Guy's been dead a hundred years, quit including him in with the scum sucking leeches^F^F^Fcorporados^Fmedia companies...

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  71. Re:OK republican shills by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, he didn't say mark twain was an idiot ecause of anything copyright related. Dude just hates Samuel Clemens.

  72. Re:OK republican shills by dryeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You agree with Hatch that Canada is in the same league as Russia and China about copyright infringement?
    Canada is not too different from the States and probably has about the same amount of copyright infringement. No one sells CDs or DVDs on the street corner unless they recorded it themselves with their own IP and I've only seen that twice. Downloading is probably equal to the rest of the western world. Only thing is there is no DMCA so if I purchase a DVD I can break the encryption and play it on my non-windows computer legally.
    Also IP based industry is perhaps even more important in Canada as so many American companies come up here to film movies.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  73. Re:Well... by dryeo · · Score: 2, Informative

    And Canada doesn't even have "Fair Use". So obviously the States is even worse then Canada about Copyright, letting people infringe copyright for satire, parody etc.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing#Fair_dealing_in_Canada

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  74. Re:OK republican shills by cml4524 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So 1 vote out of 535 and a continuation of someone else's policies and plans makes Obama more culpable than the man who actually proposed the idea - Paulson - and the only single man other than Paulson who ever had the ability to stop it - Bush.

    Makes perfect sense to me.