Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Twitter "Twitpocalypse" Snags Mac, iPhone Apps

Posted by kdawson on from the y2k-all-over-again dept.

awarrenfells notes coverage in Macworld of what is being called "the Twitpocalypse" — Twitter applications breaking as the number of tweets exceeds 32 bits. "The first apparent victim of the Twitpocalypse was The Iconfactory's Twitterrific for iPhone, which stopped working immediately following the event. ... Atebits Software's Tweetie has also been affected by the Twitpocalypse. The program continues to function for browsing and posting tweets, but searches no longer work in the Mac version and results appear one at a time in the iPhone version."

15 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Well. by dov_0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which twit didn't see that one coming? Surely it should have shown up in testing?

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    1. Re:Well. by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In later testing, it should be dected, but to overflow 32 bits thats over 2 billion messages. For being founded as a not-so-major project, I don't think they would think that in 3 years that it would reach that much.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Well. by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You might start thinking about it around 1 billion though. Maybe even at 500 million (especially if you are in some sort of obscene growth phase...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Well. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want to know who setup twits as signed. Are there going to be negative twits? Twits by your evil twin?

      THINK about what your code does and choose the appropriate data type.

  2. Re:Is it just me... by paazin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me or does Twitter seem to be the most unreliable of all social networking sites? I mean, between these outages and the "fail whale" that appears every day or so, can't they get some decent servers? I mean, even Facebook which has way more people consuming way more bandwidth doesn't go down near this often.

    Probably because they realize as soon as this fad passes, pretty much the only value they'll have are those upgraded servers.

  3. Re:And... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... nothing of value was lost.

    Actually what was lost was any hope left I had for humanity. More than 2,147,483,647 'tweets' have been 'tweeted.' God, I feel stupid just saying that. But what is that? Like half the population of earth?! And then they go so far as to call lack of mobile Twitter applications apocalyptic? Humanity has officially jumped the shark, people. Some other animal should have been given a shot at ruining the world.

    I mean at least I can derive cheap entertainment from cell phone texts but Twitter transcripts have little to no value in my eyes. If anyone needs me, I'll be in the backyard building a rocket ship to seek out another planet free of Twitter. Hopefully it'll just have more minor problems like being covered in methane or a flesh eating silicon based virus ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. Re:Overflowing 32 bits by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have faith .. if you ignore the orphan tweets, the remaining messages were only created by 37 people who aren't smart enough to realize that their friends don't really give a crap about what they are doing, or are willing to wait to hear about the important stuff when they get together to do stuff instead of sitting with deer eyes in front of the iPhone waiting for the next tweet to show up.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  5. Twitpocalypse? by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Man am I glad I never got on this bandwagon.

  6. Re:Twitter uses 64bits, 3rd party apps do not by ZyBex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most occasional programmers don't think about these issues or even, god forbids, check the API's documentation. They just happily use "long a,b,c;" all over the source code. I even bet that version 0.1 of some of those apps used "int a,b,c;" ...

  7. Re:Let's see by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What do we get out of this? Is it any different?

    --
    http://michaelsmith.id.au
  8. Why is twitter hate so cool around /. by loteck · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You guys have been calling twitter a fad for at least two years, meanwhile families, businesses, celebrities and politicians have been flocking to it in droves and using it extremely successfully. For example, Dell.

    Also, I see a lot of "what does Twitter really do??" posts. Either these posters are simply being obtuse or /. IQ's have plummeted recently.

    1. Re:Why is twitter hate so cool around /. by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some fads last long. See Second life, or SUVs. Both useless but it took a long time for most people to realize that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  9. Re:And... by MrMista_B · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You feel stupid saying 'tweet', but you're posting on a site called 'Slashdot'.

  10. why use a signed integer for that? by MrBallistic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if you know you're getting a positive number back, why not just use uint?

  11. Re:Let's see by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously: you value your RSS news feeds - but can't understand the value of updates from people that you actually know?

    Oddly enough, I have personal conversations (in real life, or online) with my friends rather than just reading "status updates" broadcast as summaries to the masses. Generally I couldn't care less about the status of people who aren't my friends, let alone people I don't even know (there seems to be a trend for people to follow celebrities on twitter that I just don't get...).

    --
    http://blog.nexusuk.org