Slashdot Mirror


Richard Stallman Says No To Mono

twitter writes "There's been a lot of fuss about mono lately. After SCO and MS suing over FAT patents, you would think avoiding anything MS would be a matter of common sense. RMS now steps into the fray to warn against a serious mistake: 'Debian's decision to include Mono in the default installation, for the sake of Tomboy which is an application written in C#, leads the community in a risky direction. It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use. .... This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. ... [writing and using applications in mono] is taking a gratuitous risk.'" Update: 06/27 20:22 GMT by T : Read on below for one Mono-eschewing attempt at getting the (excellent) Tomboy's functionality, via a similar program called Gnote. Update: 06/27 21:07 GMT by T: On the other side of the coin, reader im_thatoneguy writes "Jo Shields, a Mono Developer, has published an article on 'Why Mono Doesn't Suck,' why it is not a threat to FOSS, why it is desirable to developers and why it should be included in Ubuntu by default." LastGuyonEarth writes "Gnote was started on April 2009 by Gnome developer Hubert Figuiere, known also for his work on Abiword. The goal of Gnote is to provide a Free Software implementation of Tomboy that doesn't rely on Mono. The ultimate goal is to replace Tomboy in an effort to make Gnome and GNU/Linux distributions non-dependant on Novell's implementation of Microsoft's .NET platform. For our testing purposes, I installed Gnote 0.5.1 on Ubuntu Jaunty through a personal PPA, but I would love to see it officially packaged in the near future."

3 of 1,008 comments (clear)

  1. Re:"M$" by ionix5891 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sla$hdot makes money from adsense and other advertising, in order to make more money they need to bait readers in, i hope this site doesnt sell out altogether like tâchcrunch tho...

  2. Re:"M$" by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You must be new here...

  3. Re:Yup by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Genuinely better than what? those products you mention have some nice language features but their lack of platform independence makes then useless for many types of work (like enterprise apps on Big Iron, or embedded devices with non x86 processors, or on Linux or Mac OS X, or Android, or the iPhone ....). Also, the extra language fads put in those languages make it harder for large teams compare to Java where they eschew most new language features deliberately to keep it simpler. Computing is not just the desktop mate.