Slashdot Mirror


Seattle Data Center Outage Disrupts E-Commerce

1sockchuck writes "A major power outage at Seattle telecom hub Fisher Plaza has knocked payment processing provider Authorize.net offline for hours, leaving thousands of web sites unable to take credit cards for online sales. The Authorize site is still down, but its Twitter account attributes the outage to a fire, while AdHost calls it a 'significant power event.' Authorize.net is said to be trying to resume processing from a backup data center, but there's no clear ETA on when Fisher Plaza will have power again."

97 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Heh by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Redundancy ain't just a river in Egypt.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's interesting how many companies have assumed redundancy in place but never take the time to do proper testing. They figure that once a disaster happens, that everything will automatically work because their vendor or staff said so. To achieve true redundancy a company needs to do semi-frequent testing to ensure that everything is working properly. Authorize.net might have had what was assumed a redundant system in place, but once the disaster happen they soon realized their system wasn't designed or configured properly. It is expensive and time consuming to test redundancy, let alone actually paying for the redundant equipment/staff/etc, but in times like this it shows how one gets their moneys worth in doing so.

    2. Re:Heh by Clever7Devil · · Score: 1

      Denial of service as it were?

      --
      "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
    3. Re:Heh by panoptical2 · · Score: 1

      This is why clustering is ABSOLUTELY necessary for as large a company as Authorize.net. As parent said, putting all your eggs in one basket is a stupid idea...

      I wonder how many companies will switch to PayPal after this...

    4. Re:Heh by rhekman · · Score: 1

      ... putting all your eggs in one basket is a stupid idea...

      ....but... maybe they blew their budget on a really, really good basket?

      --
      I like teamwork. It's easier to assign blame that way.
    5. Re:Heh by tearmeapart · · Score: 1

      More information is available from the NANOG (North American Network Operator's Group) list: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.operators.nanog/65992 .

      Excerpt:
      "
      Fisher Plaza, a self-styled carrier hotel in Seattle, and home to multiple
      datacenter and colocation providers, has had a major issue in one of its
      buildings late last night, early this morning.
      The best information I am aware of is that there was a failure in the
      main/generator transfer switch which resulted in a fire. The sprinkler
      system activated. From speaking to the fire battalion chief, I am under the
      impression that Seattle Fire did use water on the fire as well, but I am
      unsure of this.
      "

      (Btw: Water + Lots of electricity = not good. I bet the electricity got turned off.)

      I would copy and paste the rest with reference, but people are posting more details as they come.

    6. Re:Heh by Nutria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there was a failure in the main/generator transfer switch which resulted in a fire. The sprinkler system activated.

      Where I work, the D.C. is in a sub-level basement. One day a few years ago, a dim-wit plumber was brazing a pipe with a propane torch, and swung it too close to a sprinkler head.

      Sprinkler went off and water did what it does: flow downhill, eventually pouring into the D.C., right onto the SAN storing "my" database...

      We were down for a few days. People couldn't access the web site or IVR, but fortunately it happened over a weekend, so the store-front operations weren't totally affected. Also, the system is part of an "asynchronously buffered" stove pipe, so operations "in front" of the downed machine just kept on processing.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:Heh by Nutria · · Score: 1

      maybe they blew their budget on a really, really good basket?

      Mark Twain: Put all your eggs in one basket, and then guard that basket!!

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  2. No Carr.... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Power outage stops /. posts. News at 11

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  3. Backup data center was impacted too by basementman · · Score: 1

    http://twitter.com/AuthorizeNet/status/2455435020 Hopefully someone made an offsite backup as well.

  4. Slow news day! by Another+AC · · Score: 1

    News at 11...

    tomorrow.

  5. Also affecting Bing.com by Cothol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bing Travel servers are located in the same server hall. More info: http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6721

  6. Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by Cysgod · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently Verizon has a single point of failure for much of its FiOS for the metro areas of Western Washington state in this building as well so the FiOS customers are offline as well right now.

    • Clownshoes: Have no failover plan and be singly homed.
    • Meh: Have a failover plan.
    • Good: Have a failover plan that requires humans and exercise it regularly.
    • Better: Have a failover plan that is automated and exercise it regularly.
    • Best: Eliminate single points of failure so failover is turning off the flake or fail and going back to drinking a beer.

    Hot/Hot is always a more ideal solution than Hot/Warm or Hot/Cold for disaster recovery (and increasing equipment utilization/ROI), and this event demonstrates why.

    1. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by Cysgod · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like from twitter comments that Verizon finished their failover since people's FiOS is coming back now.

    2. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not just FIOS it looks like, I was wondering why my DSL was offline. Nearly all network services I would guess.

    3. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by brianc · · Score: 1

      Best: Eliminate single points of failure...

      Earth is a single point of failure.

      --


      SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
    4. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'll really be concerned about that in 2087 when Verizon finally starts rolling FIOS out in Snohomish. Christ, we had DSL in 1997, what the hell do you have to do to get FIOS? Sacrifice a virgin? Then to pour lemon juice on the wound, they SATURATE the airspace, billboards, advertising on mass transit (especially buses that go to Snohomish!) telling people to order FIOS. Meanwhile I know hicks in Louisiana who can't even spell the word "fiber" who have it in their dirt-floored one-room shacks.

      Fucking Verizon.

    5. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Best: Eliminate single points of failure...

      Earth is a single point of failure.

      Milky Way Galaxy is a single point of failure.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    6. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I know hicks in Louisiana who can't even spell the word "fiber" who have it in their dirt-floored one-room shacks.

      Fucking Verizon.

      Blame the gubment for paying more money to companies who are willing to run new broadband service to areas that were previously under- or un-served. :/

    7. Re:Failover Planning (and this broke FiOS too) by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Not everything can always be hot/hot. Anything involving state and large data volumes, for example.
      Think large databases. You need block level hot/hot for redundancy. Now for real redundancy, you need the other datastore to be in a different geography, and under a different government. That's a lot of latency per transaction.

      Hot/Warm may be feasible.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  7. It's mindboggling ... by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    ... that authorize.net does not have a failover site.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
    1. Re:It's mindboggling ... by Cysgod · · Score: 1

      They do. It sounds like the involves-humans failover process failed somehow.

  8. Re:No Backup?? by mwiley · · Score: 1

    When this happens in this day and age the CIO should be fired! There is no excuse. It's a situation where you gamble that this will never happen but when it does you should go.

  9. Fisher Plaza is a disaster response center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fisher Plaza is supposed to be a regional telecomm / communications / medical care hub for the Seattle area. It was designed and built to *not* crash, even in a magnitude 9.5 quake. Sounds like they've got work to do ...

    1. Re:Fisher Plaza is a disaster response center by univalue · · Score: 1

      and this is not the first time they had an power outage. There is still no backup generate either.

    2. Re:Fisher Plaza is a disaster response center by evil-merodach · · Score: 1

      And having sprinklers in the electrical room is such a good idea too. Let's make sure we don't just suffer from fire damage.... They're lucky no one was seriously injured.

  10. System failure by ErkDemon · · Score: 5, Informative
    There are four main factors that can take a part of a society's key infrastructure offline.

    1: ACTS OF GOD
    Meteor strike, lightnight strike, extreme weather ...

    2: ACTS OF MALICE
    War, terrorism, extortion, employee sabotage, criminal attacks ...

    3: WEAK INFRASTRUCTRUCTURE
    Underpowered networks, inadequate UPS backups, skeleton staffing, the shaving of safety margins as an efficiency exercise, inadequate rate of replacing old hardware ...

    4: MANAGEMENT ARSINESS
    This is when a problem starts, and the people in charge either don't know how to react, don't care, or prioritise face-saving over actual problem-solving. This happens when you get an outage, and instead of system management promptly calling all their critical clients to inform them, and warn them that there's maybe twenty minutes of UPS capacity in the routers if the system's not fixed by then, they instead cross their fingers and hope that things'll work out, and worry about what to tell the clients afterwards.

    Fisher Plaza seems to have suffered from a case of #4 recently, so it's not surprising that they've gone down again. The first time should have been the wakeup call to show them that their human systems were in need of an overhaul. Without that overhaul, you're setting up a dynamic in which the second time it happens, things are even worse (because now people are locked into defensive mode).

    No matter how advanced your technological systems, if the people running it have the wrong mindset, you're gonna go down. And when you go down, you're gonna go down far far harder than necessary.

    1. Re:System failure by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5: Government...

      A government that decides to come to your headquarters and decides they want all of your hardware pronto...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:System failure by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      3: WEAK INFRASTRUCTRUCTURE

      It's good to see that you've provided redundancy for the "TRUC" part of your infrastructure, but I'm concerned about the rest of it.

    3. Re:System failure by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Isn't #3 a result of #4?

  11. Authorize.Net did have a backup by johnncyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...except it failed as well. From their twitter:

    "@gotwww The backup data center was impacted too. Don't have info as to why. The team is solely focused on getting us back up for now."

    1. Re:Authorize.Net did have a backup by eln · · Score: 1

      What, was the backup data center on the floor directly below the primary data center?

      If I had to guess, either they did something that stupid or they didn't properly test their failover procedures or their backup data center, and either one or both of those things turned out to be inadequate.

    2. Re:Authorize.Net did have a backup by ZorinLynx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sometimes folks set up a redundant system and forget to make one key piece redundant.

      Example: A server rack with two UPS systems. Each server has two power cords, one going to each UPS.. but the switch everything is plugged into only has one power input, so it's connected to UPS A.

      Power blinks and UPS A decides to shit itself. Rack goes down, even though all the machines are up, because the network switch loses power.

      Solution? An auto switching power Y-cable with two inputs, and one output. But 80% of people will be lazy and not bother. Oops.

      Happens all the time; I see it everywhere.

    3. Re:Authorize.Net did have a backup by linuxbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An auto switching power Y-cable with two inputs, and one output? ive never seen or heard of these.. Do you have a manufacturer or part number?
      id defiantly like some.

    4. Re:Authorize.Net did have a backup by funkboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      An auto switching power Y-cable with two inputs, and one output? ive never seen or heard of these.. Do you have a manufacturer or part number?
      id defiantly like some.

      Well, it ain't just a Y cable and they're not super-cheap, but still affordable if you're running anything that needs anywhere near the level of redundancy that they provide.

      It's called a static transfer switch and can be had for a few hundred bucks from most APC dealers (and MGE dealers, now that the merger is complete).

      What's nice about them is that unlike a UPS, colo providers don't mind if you stick an STS in your rack, as a UPS removes the colo provider's ability to completely shut off everything in the datacenter with their automated power systems if the shit really hits the fan (trust me, if there's a fire in the datacenter, you'd much rather have your servers suffer a cold shutdown than sucking in smoke and FM200 and all the other tasty stuff in the air, not to mention fanning or even directly contributing to an electrical fire if it's in your rack). An STS still enables them to completely kill the juice in an emergency while providing good & economic redundancy for single-feed machines, not to mention being close to 100% efficient.

    5. Re:Authorize.Net did have a backup by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you still have a single point of failure, you've only moved it from the UPS to the transfer switch.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  12. Geocaching.com too by dickens · · Score: 4, Informative

    And on a holiday. Bummer. :(

    1. Re:Geocaching.com too by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Aha, somebody else noticed this as well!

      Not only is it a holiday, but there is a HUGE geocaching event (for 3 days) happening in B.C. and anyone attending (I know some people) are SOL for getting information about it.

      If anyone knows of a secondary site for finding info on the events, please post!

    2. Re:Geocaching.com too by KPexEA · · Score: 1

      Event Locations
      # Cache Creek Park, 1500 Quartz Rd. (N50Â 49.039 W121Â 19.561)
      # Clinton, Reg Conn Park, Smith Ave. (N51Â 05.314 W121Â 35.225)
      # Lillooet, Xwisten Park, approx 5km from Lillooet on Hwy 40 (Moha Road) (N50Â 45.111 W121Â 56.112)
      # Logan Lake, Maggs Park, Chartrand Ave. (N50Â 29.549 W120Â 48.691)
      # Lytton, Caboose Park, 4th St. (N50Â 13.875 W121Â 34.925)
      # Merritt, Lions Park, Voght St & 1st Ave. (N50Â 06.882 W120Â 47.188)

      http://www.goldcountry.bc.ca/bcga

    3. Re:Geocaching.com too by johannesg · · Score: 1

      Geocachers of Slashdot unite!

      Yesterday I almost broke my daily record with 42 finds, but I came home too late to do the logging. Today the site was down all day long. Well, tomorrow then...

      As for KPexEA: great service!

    4. Re:Geocaching.com too by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      This is the bummer of all bummers this weekend. And me with a cache I'm about to hide.

      Nope, not gonna tell. It's a puzzle cache and no freebies!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Geocaching.com too by dickens · · Score: 1

      Still down here at 1:30 EDT Saturday. They could at least have done an off-site DNS. Weak!

    6. Re:Geocaching.com too by dwywit · · Score: 1

      My wife's going nuts. She asked me "what happens when it comes back online and a bazillion geocachers start hitting the site?

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  13. The best line from the SANS ISC by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The media are also following the story, KOMO a local station was knocked offline but are broadcasting from a backup site.

    Way to go guys! At least two national, and maybe even international, ICT companies on whom numerous affiliates depend upon fail to provide for an adequate backup facility and continuity plan, yet the local AM radio station manages to pull it off. I'm guessing that some heads are gonna roll after the holiday weekend...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:The best line from the SANS ISC by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they're talking about KOMO, the TV station, actually. It's one of the largest stations here in Seattle. I think they take up a fair chunk of Fischer Plaza, where the fire was. Still, your point about international and national business entities failing, when a local business succeeds is pretty stupid.

    2. Re:The best line from the SANS ISC by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      KOMO is one of the largest TV broadcasters in Seattle. Possibly the largest, although KING might have them beat. Yah, they also own a AM station.

      I mean, your point still kind of applies, but you might want to look up with KOMO actually is before you chime in with the podunk AM radio comments... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KOMO-TV

  14. Re:No Backup?? by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When this happens in this day and age the CIO should be fired!

    And if the CIO recommended a redundant D.C. but the CEO, CFO or Board rejected it as "too expensive"????

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  15. Re:No Backup?? by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know redundancy and such is better on business stuff, but this kind of reminds me of the fact how customer lines have lots of single failure points aswell. There was a day when TeliaSonera's, large nordic ISP, DHCP stopped working, leading 1/3 of the whole country's residents without internet access. Turns out there was a hardware failure on the dhcp server, leading me to believe that they actually depend on just one server to handle all the dhcp requests coming from customers. They did fix it in a few hours, but it was still unavailable for the rest of the day because hundreds of thousands computer's were trying to get an ip address from it. That being said, I remember it happening only once, but it still seems stupid.

  16. According to KOMO news by PPH · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... who's broadcast facilities reside in this building (they were broadcasting from a park on Queen Anne hill this morning), it was due to a transformer vault fire. The resulting sprinkler operation rendered their backup generator inoperable.

    Being in the power biz, this sort of thing is to be expected in typical office buildings. Sometimes the power goes out. Live with it. What really puzzles me is how someone can take such a structure, install a raised floor and some big A/C units on the roof and sell it as a data center. This kind of crap goes on all the time, as I've seen purpose built data centers go down for single point failures.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:According to KOMO news by kyoorius · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to theplanet.com last year. Transformer went boom, fire, etc. Backup generator was allegedly shut down as ordered by the fire department. This is happening so frequently, it should be included in the disaster planning and standard test scenarios.

    2. Re:According to KOMO news by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      Ditto happened to Caro Hosting several months ago. The backup generator, which had just been turned on because of a power outage,caught on fire. Said hosting service kept backups only of data, did not have actual failover servers (which they'd promised). Needless to say, providers were switched soon after.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    3. Re:According to KOMO news by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Fischer plaza is actually pretty robust of a site, and well compartementalized. The problem with most telecom hotels though is the battery plant is the main line of defense; generator and utility equipment are often located in the same room.

      With Verizon, their HUB there should go 8 hours on battery in this type of failure while they are trying to coordinate with Aggrecco for a roll-up unit. Depending on timing and the fire department, they would expect a 6-8 hour outage.

    4. Re:According to KOMO news by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      How would you compare it to the Westin office building, which has redundant power risers, etc.?

  17. Re:Oh, the humanity! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Let's imagine that you're actually paying this data centre large amounts of money with the assurance that the money means 99.9% uptime. Then, maybe, it might mean something more.

    If you don't give a crap about uptime, then hell, get a Google webpage or something.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  18. sloppy engineering by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "Our current estimate for re-establishing Bing Travel functionality is 5pm PST," says a notice at Bing

    When someone in a technical role screws up a timezone designation, for me that is always a red flag that they are sloppy with facts, and I need to closely watch their other decisions, actions and statements, because they may be in over their head.

    1. Re:sloppy engineering by hey · · Score: 1

      I guess your point is that it is PDT time now.

    2. Re:sloppy engineering by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      Focusing on something that 99% of us screw up at one point or another, particularly when our primary focus at the time is probably getting the service back online rather than checking the calendar to see if it's Daylight Saving Time or not, for me is always a red flag that you're an insufferable pedant.

    3. Re:sloppy engineering by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Our current estimate for re-establishing Bing Travel functionality is 5pm PST," says a notice at Bing

      When someone in a technical role screws up a timezone designation, for me that is always a red flag that they are sloppy with facts, and I need to closely watch their other decisions, actions and statements, because they may be in over their head.

      It's quite likely that this message was not posted by somebody in a technical role, but a managerial role. The technical people may very well have just said "by 5:00" or possibly "by 5:00 Pacific Time", and whoever posted the notice on the web site (while the technical people were busy working on trying to fix things) added "PST" instead of "PDT".

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:sloppy engineering by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Not really sure what you are complaining about... PST == Pacific Standard Time. I don't see anything wrong with this.

      And that's exactly why these kinds of mistakes are made.

      Seattle is currently on PDT (GMT -0700), not PST (GMT -0800). The switch back to PST happens in November.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:sloppy engineering by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Changes to the time are not random at all, they're clearly defined. Of course those definitions are periodically changed randomly with minimal notification, but that's not the same problem.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:sloppy engineering by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Come on, the guy's sig is a link to some comic rant about "its versus it's" which, whilst it annoys me no end, is most definitely a good indicator that he is, no doubt, an insufferable pedant.

    7. Re:sloppy engineering by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Pacific Standard Time.

      Seattle is on the west coast.

      Not everyone lives in new york you know...

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    8. Re:sloppy engineering by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      When someone in a technical role screws up a timezone designation, for me that is always a red flag that they are sloppy with facts, and I need to closely watch their other decisions, actions and statements, because they may be in over their head.

      When someone is excessively pedantic for the sole reason of making his virtual penis larger and harder, I point and laaaaaaaaaaugh.
       
      Seriously, get the fuck over yourself. PST is a widely used and widely accepted descriptive term for the Pacific time zone. For 99% of the people, it doesn't matter whether it's actually PST or PDST.

    9. Re:sloppy engineering by linuxbert · · Score: 1

      its still not incorrect as they stated that it was in standard time. if they only stated 5pm Pacific time, one would assume the current Daylight Savings time.
      Canadian (and American I think, but dont hold me to it) Tide and Current tables are in Standard time, so you need to remember to add the hour when you are in Daylight Savings Time, otherwise your calculations are off, and you can hit low things, and run around on high things.

    10. Re:sloppy engineering by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Also, having a Slashdot account.

    11. Re:sloppy engineering by kv9 · · Score: 1

      chromablue photography [chromablue...graphy.com]

      by your sig I can tell that you're not an insufferable pedant. at all.

  19. Re:Heads will roll (hopefully) by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

    Wow, you are just as bad as AuthorizeNet... Namely you are putting all of your eggs into one basket called AMERICA... What you are ignoring are the ramifications if a government decides to take you down. And frankly I am more worried about a government taking me down than some accident.

    I am part of a hedge fund and we have data centers in... Caymans, Monaco, and Switzerland... I think you get the drift here... And our exchanges that we talk to are scattered throughout the world... Is it simple? Cheap? Nope...

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  20. Re:Oh, the humanity! by ErkDemon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Actually -- in a totally unconnected incident -- my grocery shopping was disrupted today because (according to the note pinned to the closed store's shutters) the store's till server was down, and they'd shut up the shop while they waited for an engineer.

    I'm guessing that the server was probably local, possibly above the store, and might have gone fritzy in the heat.

    So, real-world implications of computer failure. A server goes down, and suddenly Eric Cannot Buy Cheese ("Aaaaiiiieeee!"). Eric has hard cash, store (presumably) has cheese, but store can no longer sell cheese to Eric. Or anything else.

    The shop "crashed".

    Okay, so I trudged off and did my grocery shopping elsewhere, but it was a little disturbing to think that we've already gotten to the point where a server problem can stop you buying food, in a "real" shop, with "real" money.

  21. Re:No Backup?? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    You know we had something similar happen (North Central AR) a few years back. We had over 70k people with zero Internet anything for two days. They couldn't get medical records, use CC, hell the three towns affected pretty much ground to a halt. The cause? The lines heading out to the main branch all converged on a single big fiber trunk that some dumbass farmer nailed with his backhoe while digging a ditch.

    So while you can hope there is enough redundancy in the system to keep catastrophic failures like this from occurring, the simple fact is we have no idea how much of our critical infrastructure can be taken down with a single fuck up. Maybe the US gov needs to find out which companies we depend on have such single points of failure and demand redundancy for critical infrastructure? Of course with bribery....uhhh I mean lobbying being legal the mega corps would just use it as another excuse for a bailout which they would stuff in their pockets instead of doing what we paid for. Kinda like how they took those billions we gave them for nationwide broadband and gave us the finger in return.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  22. Re:Oh, the humanity! by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's pathetic. I've seen stores stay open during 24 hour POWER FAILURES! Any manager who does not teach their employees how to manually do credit card transactions (yes you can do them by paper!) should never have been hired in the first place.

    When we lose power around here (once every 6 months or so), the stores stay open. They simply don't accept debit cards (which require a connection to the bank) until the power comes back on.

  23. Re:Button pusher did it by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    So THAT'S why there was a do not touch sign above it...
    *avoids eye contact*

  24. Re:Heads will roll (hopefully) by batquux · · Score: 1

    it would require a terrorist attack on New York PLUS an earthquake in San Francisco to knock us offline.

    Which is all moot since you're using authorize.net as a payment gateway. ;)

  25. Fisher Plaza? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like Fischer Price. Glad that none of customers rely on Authorize.net.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  26. Re:Oh, the humanity! by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

    Or (gasp!) make change without a computron! I wonder if they even train that in grocery stores anymore...scary, indeed.

    --
    My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
  27. Wow... by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
    Adhost oversees two sites for my family's business: http://www.seliger.com and http://blog.seliger.com. At least part of the Fisher Plaza data center seems to be up at the moment because seliger.com will load for me, while blog.seliger.com won't. When I figured this out a few hours ago, I sent an e-mail to Adhost and got this as part of the response:

    We have been advised by the building engineering team that they anticipate restoring power to the Plaza East building in plus or minus 4 hours. We sincerely hope this is an accurate number and, if not, we will let you know as soon as we receive new information from the engineers.

    Imagine my surprise at learning that the problem is big enough to make /.. Actually, what's even more surprising is the unplanned outage in the first place: I don't recall Adhost ever going down for this long, especially in the middle of the day.

    1. Re:Wow... by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own comment, but the Adhost e-mail servers are also working. I don't know if this is because their main site is coming back online or if it's because their backup worked.

    2. Re:Wow... by grossvogel · · Score: 1

      My website is hosted at Adhost, and it's up right now. Email, too.

      I'd post my url for proof, but, I like it to stay online...

  28. Fisher Plaza Designed to survive External factors by stmfreak · · Score: 1

    I used to manage a 22 rack cage that we leased from Internap at Fisher Plaza back in 2005. They really did build the place well. Massive diesel generators, independent well water, redundant cooling, etc. But it was designed to survive and continue broadcasting for a local news station for 18 days without resupply in the event of a major external disaster like an earthquake.

    I imagine they are reviewing their DR procedures and designs now to minimize collateral damage from internal factors.

    But let's not be too hard on them, it was one of the better colo facilities I've seen. There are far worse out there holding their pants up with three hands.

    --
    These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
  29. Re:No Backup?? by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

    They should also fire the person who was responsible for having a sprinkler installed above a transformer, exactly how is spraying water on a transformer going to help in a fire?

  30. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is the 2nd fire since 2008... Apparently Internap rent the power from the building so they have no control over the quality/maintenance of these generators and UPSes.

    The fire which started around 11:30 PM (or maybe earlier, but first signs were around that time) damaged badly some of the electrical risers, so they are unable to get power back so some parts of the datacenter. According to their last update they're getting external generators to bypass the damaged equipment and power up the rest of the datacenter, which should be completed late this evening... At best it's going to be a nearly full day outage for some of their customers.

  31. Re:No Backup?? by SkyDude · · Score: 2

    When this happens in this day and age the CIO should be fired! And if the CIO recommended a redundant D.C. but the CEO, CFO or Board rejected it as "too expensive"????

    If that's the case, then the aformentioned officers should give up their pay to the thousands of merchants who lost their day's pay due to this problem. Yeah, like that'll happen.

    Phone lines occasionally go out and that might affect local merchants, but when it's a data center that handles the livelihoods of thousands of merchants, there needs to be much greater redundancy. The businesses that are affected by this are not all huge e-tailers either. Many are just small operators trying to make a living on the web. As it stands now, a merchant can't have multiple card processors unless he's willing to pay the monthly fees for two processors. I've never heard of that being done and doubt it would be feasible.

    Merchants affected by this will just have to suck it up, but for those who are not involved in e-commerce, this is a shining example of how doing business with credit card processors is dancing with the devil. They screw you on all of the charges, they screw you on chargebacks, and now they've screwed a lot of small business people by denying them income, probably because it wasn't cost effective to have a first class backup plan.

    Happy Independence Day!

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  32. Huge portable generator arrives at Fisher Plaza by KPexEA · · Score: 2, Interesting
  33. Twitpic link blocked from Slashdot?? by KPexEA · · Score: 1

    The Twitpic link works fine from the place I found it but not when clicked via slashdot???

    1. Re:Twitpic link blocked from Slashdot?? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Works For Me.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  34. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Spike15 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or (gasp!) make change without a computron! I wonder if they even train that in grocery stores anymore...scary, indeed.

    I think the bigger issue in this case would be manually looking up the price for every single item. We tend to simplify selling things manually in this way (manually processing credit card transactions, making change manually, etc.), when really when really the biggest problem is being without the UPC system.

  35. Obligatory by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I can't buy any cheddar here? But it's the most popular cheese in the world!

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  36. Re:No Backup?? by ibbey · · Score: 1

    All fine and good... There is no possible way to design the entire world with redundant systems. But a company like Authorize.net doesn't have that excuse. Hopingh has nothing to do with it, it's called network engineering. They should have multiple data centers located in geographically dispersed parts of the world. This is hosting 101 for any large-scale internet business. The OP is right, the CIO should be cleaning out his desk as we speak.

  37. Re:Oh, the humanity! by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

    There is a reason its a 99.9% uptime and not 100%, this can happen and you can't really sue them if they argue that this is the .1% its down.

    --
    Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  38. Re:Oh, the humanity! by mpe · · Score: 1

    That's pathetic. I've seen stores stay open during 24 hour POWER FAILURES! Any manager who does not teach their employees how to manually do credit card transactions (yes you can do them by paper!) should never have been hired in the first place.
    When we lose power around here (once every 6 months or so), the stores stay open. They simply don't accept debit cards (which require a connection to the bank) until the power comes back on.


    In other words it happens frequently enough that there is a procedure to handle it. But not frequently enough for the stores to use a UPS and generator to cope with unreliable power. Not even given the loss of refrigerated/frozen stock.

  39. Re:Oh, the humanity! by adolf · · Score: 1

    I worked in retail once, for a regional department/grocery store.

    We had enough generator to maintain minimal lighting, keep cold stuff cold, and run the registers. Whenever the power was out on that end of town, people would instantly line up buying things there instead of the neighboring competitors who had no such facilities.

    I'd guess that this allowed it to pay for itself.

  40. Re:No Backup?? by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Google Checkout and Amazon Payments -- there's your redundancy, both with neither setup nor monthly fees.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  41. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    The only thing I can add was that I was at a Home Depot once during an extended power outage. They had a generator that ran emergency lighting and the register system, but they had to wait a while for it to boot back up and re-sync to corporate or something. Anyway, during that time they had employees all over the place helping people write down the price of items they were purchasing so the checkers could ring you up manually. At the register they would write down the UPC, price and quantity to update inventory later. Credit transactions were authorized by phone. Certainly a bit slower checkout process than usual, but they didn't close up shop just because the power went out.

    --
    this is my sig
  42. Re:Oh, the humanity! by sjames · · Score: 1

    Way back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, we had these 'stickers' on every can that showed the price....

    Others would print it in ink using a stamper.

  43. Re:Oh, the humanity! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Let's imagine that you're actually paying this data centre large amounts of money with the assurance that the money means 99.9% uptime.

    Then I'd have to kill myself for having created a stupid business model.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  44. Re:No Backup?? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    And if the CIO recommended a redundant D.C. but the CEO, CFO or Board rejected it as "too expensive"????

    Then they fire the CIO post-haste and blame the whole thing on him.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  45. Re:No Backup?? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

    Neither Google Checkout or Amazon Payments look like a good substitute for card-present transactions, while authorize.net has a card-present interface (among others).

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex