Slashdot Mirror


Tracking a Move Via "Find My iPhone"

dmolnar writes "I recently helped my girlfriend move her stuff from Chicago, IL to Oakland, CA. The movers were scheduled to arrive at 8AM on the 5th of July, and we were stressing the day before about all the things that could go wrong with a move. We realized that if we knew where her stuff was, it'd make us feel better. This is a story about using the $99 iPhone to track the move ... and about a somewhat surprising potential use of Find My iPhone to track your friends' iPhones without them noticing."

50 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Much cheaper... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personally I would have gone with something from deal extreme, a GPSSMS bridge. It costs the same as the iPhone, but without the contract. You could have bought simple card from Walmart.

    Not to mention it would have been designed for this and probably last a bit longer. Put in eBay after you're done and recoup some of the costs.

    What does a iPhone cost without the data plan? (Say the phone broke and you need a new one, not to mention you just signed up for 2 years)

    http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.25332
    http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.21686
    http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.11314

    1. Re:Much cheaper... by siloko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't the whole point of the article about current users utilising existing features in new and innovative ways. i.e. with a marginal cost of zero.

    2. Re:Much cheaper... by speedtux · · Score: 5, Informative

      Isn't the whole point of the article about current users utilising existing features in new and innovative ways. i.e. with a marginal cost of zero.

      That would be using one of the many location tracking features that have been out for years for other smartphones. The total cost isn't $99+2 year contract, but simply $200 for the phone and no contract.

      These days, the simplest of the bunch is probably Google Latitude.

      No expensive iPhone needed.

    3. Re:Much cheaper... by YourExperiment · · Score: 2, Informative

      What does a iPhone cost without the data plan? (Say the phone broke and you need a new one, not to mention you just signed up for 2 years)

      From reading the article (I know, sorry!) it seems they believed there was a clause in the AT&T contract which allowed them to cancel within 30 days and keep the iPhone.

      I think they might have been mistaken about that, since AT&T are unlikely to make much money giving away iPhones for free. To use everyone's favourite analogy, it's like renting a car for a week, but if you cancel within 24 hours you get to keep the car.

    4. Re:Much cheaper... by digitalchinky · · Score: 5, Informative

      So all your belongings are in boxes, including this GPS with SMS bridge business you speak of, all of which is buried under clothes or whatever, sitting deep inside a moving truck which just happens to be built out of sheet metal, strengthened by a steel or alloy frame of sorts (Last time I checked, all of them were built this way) A nice little Faraday cage yes?

      Your solution would not work, this guy lucked out in that the system was using cell towers to triangulate the phones location, if it was true GPS it would not have worked.

    5. Re:Much cheaper... by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't you rather have the iPhone in your pocket, to receive calls?

      However if you have a *spare* iPhone 3G or 3GS, it's a great idea. How many people have spare iPhone 3Gs?

    6. Re:Much cheaper... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How did you come up with that conclusion.

      The only point of that article is to advertise the crappy iPhone, which nobody would buy, were it not for the bubble of love they create around you and it. ^^

      (Hmm... Sadly I think it may be more serious that I wished it to be.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Much cheaper... by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My phone doesn't have a camera. It doesn't have internet. It doesn't have ringtones. It doesn't have GPS. It doesn't run programs.

      My phone makes phone calls, and I love it to death.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:Much cheaper... by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However if I already have an phone it is a useful feature nicely outlined in the article.

      Fixed that for you. Yes, that was his point - this has been available on phones for years. Why do we need an article specifically for the Iphone, just because it finally joins the club? I thought Slashdot was once a place to find news on cutting edge technology - okay, I know we joke about stories turning up late, but...

      What next? "Using Your Iphone To Talk To People"?

    9. Re:Much cheaper... by smallfries · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the truck acts as a Faraday cage why would it block GPS but let through cellphone traffic? They are both just radio on different frequencies after all.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    10. Re:Much cheaper... by dmitrygr · · Score: 2, Informative

      A faraday cage blocks signals IFF it is grounded. Last I checked trucks are on RUBBER wheels on a non-conductive road. Even wonder why you get cell reception in elevators? Same reason. Please go redo your college physics course.

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
    11. Re:Much cheaper... by rhsanborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect it acted much less like a Faraday cage than just a poor place to get much of a signal. But I also suspect they'd have a much better chance getting a cell signal than a gps signal.

    12. Re:Much cheaper... by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just so there's no confusion ... the parent post is incorrect. Faraday cages do not have to be grounded. There are reasons to ground them, but they can work just fine as a faraday cage even if not ground.

    13. Re:Much cheaper... by gpalyu · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get a free MobileMe 60 day trial too.

    14. Re:Much cheaper... by tholomyes · · Score: 5, Funny

      It doesn't have ringtones...

      My phone makes phone calls, and I love it to death.

      You should really upgrade to a newer model. They can receive calls now, too!

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    15. Re:Much cheaper... by AdamTrace · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fascinating.

      Up until this moment, I had no idea there was a Penske vs. U-HAUL religious war, complete with fanboys! I learned something today!

  2. Iphones are not $99 by diakka · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do people really buy in to the BS about an Iphone being $99? IT's only $99 if you sign your soul away for 2 years. The mobile carriers here are so fortunate to have an ignorant populace that is eager to go through the mental gymnastics required to truly believe that their iphone only costed $99.

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:Iphones are not $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA:

      "AT&T has a clause in their contract where you can opt out within 30 days without paying the early termination fee."

    2. Re:Iphones are not $99 by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you also return the hardware, sure.

      That caveat works fine for a scenario like this, until it's systemically abused, prompting AT&T to change its policies when it has too many returned phones (not just iPhones, but any other data-enabled device that might be used for just such a trick).

      It works now because of the balance--it's a good supply of refurbed phones, which are still profitable for the carrier, to a point. As with most things, it's all about balance.

    3. Re:Iphones are not $99 by speedtux · · Score: 4, Informative

      So.... how do you use any phone with out service? The contract really means nothing the US since AT&T is the only major GSM carrier in the US that supports all of the features of the iPhone.

      You can get an unlocked Nokia N78 for about $230 with no contract. Then, buy AT&T prepaid. It's a lot cheaper than an iPhone with a 2 year contract and has the same functionality.

      What carrier would a person switch to without losing features?

      Works fine in Europe, where phones and service are a lot cheaper, all carriers are compatible, and people can switch freely (unless they sign a contract, which also exist if you want the phone discount). There's no reason it couldn't work here.

    4. Re:Iphones are not $99 by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I too enjoyed the part where he advocated defrauding AT&T. I sure hope they give him a call.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Iphones are not $99 by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but the article specifically said the immortal "it's only $99!!!"

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Iphones are not $99 by speedtux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What they don't understand is that they have good alternatives. Get an unlocked Google, Nokia, or Windows Mobile phone and a prepaid plan and you pay much less for a smartphone that gets the job done (and actually is nicer for text messages and a lot of other uses).

    7. Re:Iphones are not $99 by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      hehe, you think people haven't, for decades now, been buying shit with the intention of using it for n days and then returning it? You think there hasn't been a court case finding on it? It's well established law. If you buy something with the intention of returning it, you're not acting in good faith. It's simple fraud.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:Iphones are not $99 by Namarrgon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, what set that rant off? I don't think the OP said anything about a ripoff. It sounded more like surprise that so many people seem to focus exclusively on the $99 upfront cost and (apparently) ignore the monthly, as if that was irrelevant. Another example of this attitude is the fuss a lot of people made over the extra fee required to pay off the rest of their iPhone 3G contract when upgrading.

      By way of comparison, in AU there is a fairly wide range of upfront vs monthly options. I pay full price for an unlocked phone and pay only $10/month (not unlimited, but sufficient for me), so 2 years of $60+/month extra payments would nearly double my overall cost, despite subsidies.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    9. Re:Iphones are not $99 by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Story writer is an irresponsible asshole. "O, Ill just use it and then return it, who cares if it costs other people time and money." What a prick.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:Iphones are not $99 by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      hehe, you think people haven't, for decades now, been buying shit with the intention of using it for n days and then returning it? You think there hasn't been a court case finding on it? It's well established law. If you buy something with the intention of returning it, you're not acting in good faith. It's simple fraud.

      Eh? If I buy a product that comes with a contract saying "you can return it for whatever reason within the first 30 days for a full refund" then returning it for any reason is _not_ fraud.

      Taking advantage of the agreed terms of a contract is perfectly legal.

    11. Re:Iphones are not $99 by dzfoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      That clause is predicated on your good faith intention of actually keeping the item until, for some reason, you decide it did not meet your expectations and so you return it. If you intention from the start was to take advantage of this clause by using the item and returning it before the deadline, you are not acting in good faith; your intent is to defraud the company.

      It would have been an easy case for AT&T to make, given the guy's confession and all.

      Check out "Wardrobing" or "renting":
                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_fraud

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    12. Re:Iphones are not $99 by icebraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Portugal we have the *right by law* to return those kind of products before 15 days after buying them. ISP contracts too, if you find that it sucks (for example, you have massive ping or you only get 3 of the 15Mbps from any servers but their own) you can cancel it, with full refund.

      But I don't believe it gets much abused. What are abused are nice warranties like some shops give you: My friend bought a 20GB IPod, an year after goes to the store and complains about it shutting down randomly (false) and they give him a new *40GB* version. And year after, he repeats it and gets a 80GB version.
      This is why we can't have nice things :|

    13. Re:Iphones are not $99 by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actual citation needed.

      The RIAA called downloading music a crime before it became criminal, there's nothing in that article to support the assertion that it's illegal to 'wardrobe'.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    14. Re:Iphones are not $99 by subreality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's well established law. If you buy something with the intention of returning it, you're not acting in good faith. It's simple fraud.

      Citation needed.

      I've just spent some time googling around on this one. The term for this seems to be "Wardrobing". There's a stub article, but nothing about law. Nor did any turn up in any of my searching. If it's well-established law, I'd expect it to be a FAQ answered by many retailers. It's not.

      I also fail to see how it is fraud, unless there are complicating circumstances, such as trying to return an item purchased at another store, or keeping the accessories, or other underhandedness... But if there's no deception, and they have a "for any reason" return policy, how could it be fraud?

      On a practical note, several times I have returned things to a local chain with a 100% refund policy, and stated directly that I had no intention to keep it unless I was either too lazy to return it, or unexpectedly impressed with the product, and since neither had happened, please take it back... And they always have. They've certainly never suggested that it was illegal, or even against the spirit of the return policy. (I also think it's ethical, given the circumstances. That's certainly debatable, but outside the scope of this post.)

  3. Moving company? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What peace of mind do you get from knowing where your stuff is? Is there anything you can do with that information?

    I wonder if it isn't more a matter of control that you feel like you're giving up by letting professionals do their job. Do you also insist on driving everywhere instead of taking a plane or bus?

    1. Re:Moving company? by iffer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see the point of knowing here your stuff is if you have stuff that you absolutely cannot loose, but in thit case you probably wouldn't send it using a relocation company.

    2. Re:Moving company? by webreaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The parent's point was that why do you need to continually call the removal people to find out where they are?

      If you trust the company to move your stuff, then they'll get it to your new place as soon as they can. If they're late, they should call you. If you don't trust the company to move your stuff, then hire somebody else, or hire a van and move the stuff yourself.

      Seems totally paranoid to want to 'track' the removal company, if you ask me!

    3. Re:Moving company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, a friend of mine lost his stuff in a move, and it took the moving company some eight months to find it. They wouldn't admit it was lost (so he could claim insurance and buy replacements), but I don't know what else it was doing for all that time. So, in at least one case, it would have been helpful to be able to tell them "it's on pier 8 in Rotterdam" (or wherever). The original author wasn't trying to control the people doing the move, just wanting to know how it was going.

  4. Re:$99 iPhone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why, off the back of a truck, of course!

  5. Google Lattitude by iffer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Won't google lattitude achieve exactly the same thing? I have it installed on my BB and I can get the location of half a dozen of my friends that have added me to their "friends" list on their devices (both BB and iPhones). There is also a google maps gadget you can use to check the location from your PC. What advantages do you get from using MobileMe and Find My iPhone ?

  6. "find my iphone" is EXPENSIVE by Werrismys · · Score: 2, Informative

    The "find my iphone" feature requires a MobileMe account. MobileMe is an expensive set of web based services that can easily be substituted with Flickr and Google's stuff. So, 79â a year for tracking my phone i n case I lose it? No thanks.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  7. Is this even legal in most places? by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought you needed a warrant or at least a private investigator's license to track people by GPS without their knowledge.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Is this even legal in most places? by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh... yes.
      And Cheney had a valid warrant for every single act of spying he did.

      But a bunch of college kids don't have the handy excuse, nor the political clout to keep themselves out of prison over a silly stunt.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  8. Re:Privacy concern? by iffer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its much easier to track someone with Lattitute. Send them a request from your phone and when you get a minute with their phone acceept the request and you're away. When you can exit google maps it still continutes tracking the phone so unless they manually turn off the lattitude feature (and it does ask you every time you exit the app) they will be none the wiser. I'm not a lawyer but I would bet this is probablt illegal.

  9. Re:$99 iPhone ? by StackedCrooked · · Score: 2, Informative

    675 EUR for an iPhone 3GS (32 GB) that is unbound to a provider or contract. That's the price here in Belgium.

  10. Think of the lawyers! by fantomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only in the USA do people shout "think of the lawyers!" before considering innovations in technology.... ;-)

    The guy is only tracking his own stuff. He doesn't know who's driving the truck, if they changed every 100 miles and different people are in the cab from when they picked up his stuff, if they are in the cab when the vehicle is stationary or if they've gone off to a cafe or home to sleep for the night. He only knows where his iphone is. For all he knows his stuff might have been shifted to another vehicle, he doesn't even know if it's in the same truck.

  11. So much for RTFA... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Informative

    "As for returning the iPhone, I keep meaning to, but somehow it has become...precious...to me. Maybe Apple will claim a new iPhone user out of all this after all."

    Where does it say he threw it away? That would be an idiotic thing to do in any case.

  12. More accurate summary by kklein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guy wants to do something bizarre and paranoid. Looks for an honest way of doing it. Concludes that would be too expensive, and notices that if he pretends to want a new cellphone, and pretends to want a set of web-based services for it, he can get them for $99, claim he doesn't like the phone or service, and cancel them up to 30 days later.

    Plan works as intended and results in the exact same situation as if he didn't do the bizarre and paranoid thing (movers tell you they'll be at the destination at one time, but come at another).

    Guy expresses shock that setting a phone up to report its location to a web service results in --gasp!-- the phone reporting its location to a web service!!! Notes that if you don't keep your web password or your phone secured, your security could be compromised!

    Finishes by admitting he likes the phone, which is a relief because this isn't a story so much about hardware, but someone's lack of honesty and willingness to rip companies off in order to do a bizarre and paranoid thing.

    1. Re:More accurate summary by gravyface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand the point of this entire exercise. Where did he think the truck was going, on a Ferris Bueller-esque "joy ride" across the country?

      He had his dates mixed up as well: movers were scheduled to come in at 8am on the 5th, Best Buy was open at 10am on the 5th, and after buying the phone, he says the movers are coming the next morning, which would would've been the 6th.

      I don't have an iPhone, but would it get a signal while packed in a cardboard box while in a fully-enclosed metal container?

      --
      body massage!
  13. Re:UK Phone Contracts by YourExperiment · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's very nice Mr. Cowardon, but you're not the demographic I'm talking about. I'm referring to the people who sign up to £30 or £40 contracts without even thinking about it, so they can have the very shiniest new handsets. Perhaps the minority require a thousand SMS and several GB of data a month, but I expect they're in the minority.

  14. Re:Cheap GPS logger? by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a Garmin Venture CX for a similar purpose; to record where I have been so that I can interpolate the location of pictures I took with where I was, based on the timestamp of the picture.

    It has a feature where every day can be logged to the MicroSD card, so while the built-in memory is a bit limited, you can have basically unlimited storage in the MicroSD card.
    Get some good batteries and it lasts a while. (Hybrid batteries like the Sanyo Eneloops are very much recommended.)

    No Bluetooth, but it does have a USB interface that works well in Ubuntu, and as a bonus you can power it off a laptop/cell phone charger. My GPS has spent a while on the dash of a firetruck plugged in recording where I have been.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  15. OK, if you want to be serious. by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was making a bit of a joke but if you want to be serious, I can do that, too.

    I know of two cases where this scam was successfully overcome by the victim. In both of them, the victim told the guy who knocked on the door to come on in and get his money. When the fraudster stepped inside, the victim's mate (in both these cases, the scammers thought they were dealing solely with a defenseless woman) proceeded to beat the scammer varying degrees of senseless and then walk him back out to the truck to order the cargo unloaded. The cargo was duly unloaded (in one case, they just put everything on the front lawn, but at least they unloaded) and the scammers then beat a hasty retreat, never to be heard from again.

    People who pull scams like this generally have been on the wrong side of encounters with the cops before. They don't want to involve them again and are loathe to dial 911 unless the shit has really hit the fan and someone's bleeding. Thus, the judicious application of force or the threat of it, if done properly and in a low-key way, is a valid negotiating tool with cretins like this.

    Now, arming yourself and starting a confrontation is probably a bad plan. But arming yourself, finding your stuff, and stealing it back when the bad guys aren't around may be a workable one. YMMV.

    Personally, I've only used movers three times in my life and I've been very careful to select established, reputable firms. I don't hook up with dodgy characters to save a few buck. I think that's a better strategy, overall. But I am willing to grant that some physical force or the threat of it, employed properly so that the authorities are never involved, can be a reasonable approach.

    Sound better?

    PS - I had a scumbag brother-in-law who used this kink in the law to great advantage. He ripped off dozens of old ladies by finding out when coin collectors died. He would then approach the widows, offer to market the collections of their deceased spouses, pay them a small "advance" on what he assured them would be a big return, then leave with the coins. He never paid them another dime. There were a number of criminal complaints filed and his defense was always the same. "I paid her for the coins. There was no deal for anything else. This was not a theft. It's just a contract dispute." He beat the rap several times before, finally, the state got so many complaints that they opened a combined fraud case on him He settled for some pitiful amount of restitution and five years probation. From personal experience, I believe that people who pull these kinds of scams are cowards who won't call the police unless they're forced to and deserve a beating for their actions. So I don't apologize for taking a hard line on these situations.

  16. Apparently by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's primarily angst ridden geeks who worry about all the crap they've accreted.

     

    --
    Deleted