Slashdot Mirror


Tron Legacy Exposed

KingofGnG writes "Disney has chosen the San Diego Comic-Con International to present its new sci-fi project: the sequel to Tron. The classic movie from 1982 dealt with video games, virtual reality and 3D graphics when none of those things were widely popular. The new movie has got an official title and synopsis now, and they've released the very first trailer from the movie (this time without silly censorship) together with some concept art and the teaser poster." No matter how silly the movie is, they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.

15 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Videogames in 1982? by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Videogames weren't popular in 1982? Let me guess: in 1982, you were still a
    Hershey bar in your dad's back pocket.

    One word: Pacman

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Videogames in 1982? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed, you have no idea how huge games were in 1982. There will never be anything approaching the level of furvor over video games today like what existed in the typical 80's arcade.

    2. Re:Videogames in 1982? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Laurie Anderson's song "Smoke Rings"

      When I was a Hershey bar
      In my father's back pocket.
      Hey look! Over there!
      It's Frank Sinatra
      Sitting in a chair.

      Possibly something to do with the WW2 cliche of GIs offering candy for sexual favors?

  2. Disney pah by Plunky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No matter how silly the movie is they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.

    Do not give Disney your money, they will only use it to steal your culture

    1. Re:Disney pah by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What culture?

      --
      Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  3. Disney... by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how silly the movie is, they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.

    Oops, you just defined the source to 90% of Disney's revenue.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Disney... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see the other 10% of their revenue coming from the new game "LightCycles 3D"
      Which I sadly will probably buy a copy of.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Disney... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and the reason that George Lucas continues to crap all over Star Wars. :(

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  4. Could not care less. by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll get downed for the fanboys, but whatever:

    I couldn't possibly care less about a Tron sequel. The original was enjoyable when you were a kid, but watching it as an adult, you just realize what boring and uninteresting crap it is. It isn't even watchable in stretches longer than about fifteen minutes. So anyone who has finally realized what crap it is won't care about a sequel and kids today who are the age that we were when we liked the first one won't care because they weren't around for the first one.

    I could almost understand a remake and doing it right this time. But a sequel suggests that they thought the original was actually good. The only people who will care about this are those who are suffering a heavy bout of nostalgia and haven't watched it recently so still mistakenly believe it's AWESOME.

    It's like Knight Rider. I'm sure a lot of us remember how cool Knight Rider was when we were kids. Then watched a couple episodes as adults and realized how stupid and terrible and uninteresting it is.

    Instead of this shameless money-grab, they should... you know... do something new.

    1. Re:Could not care less. by JockTroll · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pissing on the slashdot hive mind does have its appeal.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  5. Re:Screw TRON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    TRON gave an unrealistic expectation of what computers could do which continues to perplex Ludites to this day.

    Huh? The Tron I remember was a fantasy piece akin to a kids imagination (go figure for a Disney Movie) of what the "inside" of a computer would be like. Or the "world" inside the computer.

    The move prevailing theme was capturing the video game social crazy of the late 70's early 80's. How it was turning lives into video games as people got sucked into a games "virtual reality".

    I don't recall it taking itself anywhere near serious with regards to computer technology. Perhaps you're seeing something that wasn't there, or I'm missing something from the classic.

  6. Screw the Ludites! by KGBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll have an unrealistic expectation of any expression of technology, by definition. All the while War Games and Tron were inspiring a whole generation (myself included) to learn what it's all about. We knew very well the expectations in both movies were unrealistic, but that was never the point. I had no hope of making my Sinclair ZX81 do anything remotely close to what Tron showed me but I got to fell like Flynn when I hacked a reset button for it (pin 13 to ground on the Z80). (Good) sci-fi is about inspiration, not reality. If it were realistic it would be a documentary and in 1982 a very boring one...

  7. Re:Lightcycles only do straight lines! by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Easy... the world figured out floating point arithmetic and partial derivative vector processing...

  8. It won't stand out anymore by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back when video games were a fairly new thing and CGI was amazing they made Tron. The visual style was impressive, especially given the use of hand tinting and other post processing effects. These days it's all too easy using CGI and other computer gadgetry.

    There simply isn't any way that this sequel can stand out compared to all the other CGI fx laden films around. Unless of course they go for rotoscoping or similar as used in A Scanner Darkly.

  9. I wish Sark was in this. by Sark666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm excited as hell for this movie, but I wish they brought back David Warner as Sark. You might say he's too old, but I've seen him in something recently and he still looks good. He's truly an underrated actor and makes a great villain.

    A little pointless trivia, he was also the voice of the MCP.