The Rise of the Digital Nomad
krou writes "The Washington Post has a look at the rise of the digital nomad, workers who have shunned the idea of working in an office, or working from home. Instead, they've taken the next logical step in the evolution of teleworking, and work wherever there is a Wi-Fi or 3G connection, using tools such as Facebook, Skype, and Twitter, to gain both primitive ('If I'm working at home by myself, I am really hating life. I need people.') and practical ('There is no hope for the road system around here.') benefits from this nomadic lifestyle. The need for contact with other people has driven some nomads to start working with others in public places and at strangers' homes. Other benefits from nomadic working include changing the scenery, and starting the work day 'long after many of their colleagues out at the cubicle farm have spent hours preparing for and getting to their workstations.' Coffee shop owners love the trend, and so do some employers, one of whom (an AOL manager), says: 'It's a win-win' because the employee in question 'is happy doing what he loves and from a business perspective, we gain valuable industry knowledge, contacts, and insights.'"
Seems more like it's just people who want to feel like they're on vacation all the time instead of at work. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against it. I just think the label "Digital Nomad" is a bit of a stretch.
Please, cutting new trend? More like "Leeches find new ways not to pay for things." I see those types of people around the local coffee shop. Most of the time they don't even buy anything. I know a lot of people are going to blame the coffee shop for not securing the network for paying customers only, but human decency is supposed to fill that gap.
Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
If all you need is a VPN connection to home office to be productive, suddenly Indians and Chinese and Israelis and Irishman can bid for and compete for the same job. You may feel you are on top of the game and this does not pose any immediate threat to your job. Even if the job is safe, the salaries will be lower because there are people willing to do the same job for less pay, less benefits. Eventually someone will learn to do your job, do it better than you and will be willing to accept lower pay than you.
Unlike the H1Bs, these workers do not pay taxes to USA nor do they spend the money in the local shops and take vacations within USA. It is prospect of getting cheap labor from these countries that prompt corporate America to promote telecommuting. Remember that.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
That's fine for people who don't want or need something like a "steady income" and projects for companies who don't care about things like a contractor's reputation. This sort of thing is good for people with either:
A) Large personal portfolios but small enough egos that they can fit their heads into a room with enough strangers to collaborate on a project that may take weeks
OR
B) Kids looking to start a portfolio or gain work experience.
An interesting concept, to say the least. If done with due dilligence, it could lend a hand with those who do this sort of thing in their off-time but cannot be bothered to market themselves. I wouldn't go as far as to say it will replace the cubicle for 95% of the world's digital gears.
I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
The summary claims, "Coffee shop owners love the trend," but I believe that's a bit of an overgeneralization. From my admittedly very limited conversations with small coffee shop owners around the SF Bay Area, the general consensus I've found is that the people who make the coffee shop their office (sorry, "digital nomads" sounds stupid) take up quite a bit of space for a long period of time and don't order much. At places where there's a ton of space, it's not much of an issue, but in areas where space is a luxury (e.g. SF, Berkeley, etc.), the owners definitely seem to be a bit resentful. To be fair, it guarantees them some small consistent income throughout the day, but if they lose just a couple customers who would have bought lunch if there was room for them to sit, then they're at a loss. Also pretty much everyone I talked to has a story of some jerk who'd come and use their Internet access all day and doesn't even have the courtesy to buy a drink.
Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
...if your job involves working with sensitive information.
I have a bad feeling about this...
I didn't say anything about "cool", it's about shunning traditional aspects of society and being on the cutting edge. I'd say that's most of us here.
Free Martian Whores!
The only reason they buy a mac is because it's a fashion icon. That's why you see them sitting on the library steps with the mac on one knee, and walking around in designer clothes with the conspicuous and awful white earbuds. It's because they care about public opinion.
I can see how Skype may assist in working, but it completely fails me where Facebook or Twitter would come in handy as *tools* for *work* for the vast majority of jobs.
The coffee shop can always ask them to leave. It's not against the law to kick people out who are impeding your business. If it were, we could all just go down to Wal-Mart and skateboard the aisles all day.
My blog. Good stuff (when I remember to update it). Read it.
learn to read, man. he said: "most of the time they don't even buy anything" which would mean that they are inside the shop and without a cup of coffee.
this kind of leech does cost something, as they are using up 2 finite resources: bandwidth and a table. i have seen it myself and it pisses me off when there are no tables left and i bought something.
These people don't generate as much business as you might think. And they drive away business in fast food restaurants by taking up a whole table for hours.
Someone needs to pay for the infrastructure to be built (the ISP), so those who access it need to pay for their usage. There's no such thing as 'free and public' as long as it requires an infrastructure.
Sure, we could turn the internet into a public work, but we'd still be paying for it (that's what taxes are for). Are we sure we want the FCC in charge of running fiber?
Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
Dynamically forming new teams all the time won't work because you have to personally get to know people to know what you can expect them to do. Keyword searching of resumes doesn't really meet that requirement. It's not just a matter of satisfying potentially irrational emotions in humans (such as loyalty and trust), but also the fact that each knowledge worker has different knowledge. Even a sports team, doing a relatively simple and well defined task e.g. playing basketball, has to play together for a while to perform well together.
>work wherever there is a Wi-Fi or 3G connection, using tools such as Facebook, Skype, and Twitter,
Seriously, how much real work happens on ANY of these platforms?
They provide more distractions than help.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
"B) Kids looking to start a portfolio or gain work experience."
- I'll take B.
I dislike how this "news" is packaged as a strategy, I'm guessing that some wanna-be up-and-comer marketing droid took a good look at what he noticed he and some of his unemployed-but-looking graduate friends were doing, and thought to spin it as a strategy rather than what it really is.. people who can't get more than temp-work and are stuck in coffee shops to a) get out of the house so they won't spend time sleeping or playing WoW, and b)prettying up the fact that they're stuck in a coffee shop with nothing to do but browse facebook.
I would rather have seen this die than actually become news on slashdot.. This is a clear case of marketing-speak, and I was kind of hoping that recent events in the last 9 years or so would help people to stop this kind of non-news.