Slashdot Mirror


US Supercomputer Lead Sparks Russian Govt's Competitive Drive

CWmike writes "Russia's launch of Sputnik in 1957 triggered a crisis of confidence in the US that helped drive the creation of a space program. Now, Russia is comparing the US's achievements in supercomputing with theirs, and they don't like what they see. In a speech on Tuesday, Russia's President, Dmitry Medvedev, criticized his country's IT industry almost to the point of sarcasm for failing to develop supercomputing technology, and urged a dramatic change in Russia's use of high-performance computing. Medvedev, at the opening address of a Security Council Meeting on Supercomputers in Moscow, told attendees that 476 out of the 500 supercomputers on the Top500 list were manufactured in the United States. 'Therefore, in general, our situation is very difficult,' he said."

52 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. In soviet russia... by Haffner · · Score: 1, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, you make supercomputers into Playstation 3!

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    1. Re:In soviet russia... by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      The obvious answer to this story is...start another botnet.

      If botnets were added to the supercomputer ranking, where would they be? And how many are Russian?

      --
      No reason to lie.
    2. Re:In soviet russia... by autoevolution · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I don't think there are any botnets that are capable of distributed computing.

    3. Re:In soviet russia... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Any botnet + folding@home

  2. Remarkable Idea by deathcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Send some dudes to America with some cash and buy some nice computing equipment. Do you have some serious computing to do? Or do you have a serious need to build new computers?

    1. Re:Remarkable Idea by Eddy+Luten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be more frugal for Russia to send these guys to Taiwan or China instead since all of the technology is being developed and manufactured there.

    2. Re:Remarkable Idea by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Send some dudes to America with some cash and buy some nice computing equipment. Do you have some serious computing to do? Or do you have a serious need to build new computers?

      I think the later. It's more a question of national pride than a pressing need to do some super computing. That and a fear of falling too far behind in technology.

    3. Re:Remarkable Idea by Brigadier · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Soviet Union my mistake Russia will make this mistake again see link.

      http://slashdot.org/it/04/02/02/1153243.shtml

    4. Re:Remarkable Idea by j-stroy · · Score: 1

      Which is worse, falling behind in technology, or failing to effectively integrate technologies?

      The brilliance of russian thrift and efficiency (no doubt brought about by scarcity) is unmatched by the west's treadmill of newer and better, which is disruptive to integration and has lead to many technological dead ends and restarts. Not to mention inability to reproduce past results.

      An example is their space launch systems that run like clockwork, while ARES designs call for a 6 ton rubber damper be added. Lunacy. All the russian coders I have had the privilege of working with produced amazing results... now maybe the lame ones just stayed at home, but I think there is a resiliency there that we could all learn from.

      If we stopped creating new technologies, and just fully integrated what we have already, I would bet that overall progress would be greater, since so many technologies have moved ahead without being fully understood or cross connected. Now with regard to super computers, we have all those cycles, but can we really harness them effectively other than for specific models?

    5. Re:Remarkable Idea by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      USSR used to be a major aircraft manufacturer, be it military or civil (Tu-104 was the first reliable jet airliner, Tu-204 was the second fly by wire airliner and so on). Nowadays the Russian aircraft industry has fallen behind Brazilia which hurts both the wallet and the national pride.

      So it is both - a need for serious computing and serious need to build new computers.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:Remarkable Idea by cusco · · Score: 1
      Back in the Bad Old Days, when US computer manufacturers were prohibited from selling high-performance equipment to the Soviet Union, IBM set up an assembly factory in Tacna, Peru, under a shell company. They sold "spare parts" to the shell company, which then assembled them into AS/400s and System 38s and shipped them to Moscow.

      So much trivia, so little time to pass it all along . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:Remarkable Idea by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Lunacy? Do Russians have anything remotelly comparable to ARES please? USSR have created something comparable to von Braun's Saturn V (which did run like clockwork, unlike what Soviet project has produced) only in mid 80-th.

  3. They can buy them from China just like the US does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With most of the work done in developing motherboards, stamping silicon, and exporting the machines done in China, Russia can buy their computers from the same source as the US.

    Plus, with the advances in malware, why own a computercomputer when you can pwn it?

  4. I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought Russia led in distributed node supercomputers (aka botnets). Shows what I know.

  5. Supercomputers for the sake of supercomputers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So what? Suddenly we have to start building supercomputers in Russia?
    Lack of supercomputers means nobody needs them. That's an indication that Russia is falling behind in technology in general. You can't fix this just by building some supercomputers.
    Something more fundamental must be done: fight corruption, establish rule of law, create infrustructure. Then the high-tech industry will emerge by itself. No need for the government to build supercomputers.

    1. Re:Supercomputers for the sake of supercomputers? by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, and this is not long after Putin told Michael Dell that they are not "invalids" and didn't need help.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  6. Russian computers by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beawulf cluster of these?

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:Russian computers by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Dmitry Medvedev: "In Soviet Russia you make Beowulf Cluster."

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  7. Appropriate Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Mr. President, if I may speak freely, the Russkie talks big, but frankly, we think he's short of know how. I mean, you just can't expect a bunch of ignorant peons to understand a machine like some of our boys. And that's not meant as an insult, Mr. Ambassador, I mean, you take your average Russkie, we all know how much guts he's got. Hell, lookit look at all them them Nazis killed off and they still wouldn't quit."
                                                      - General "Buck" Turgidson

  8. Russia caught up with the US in 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    From chernenko@kremvax.UUCP Sun Apr 1 15:02:52 1984
    Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site mcvax.UUCP
    Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 4/1/84 (SU840401); site kremvax.UUCP
    Path: mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko
    From: chernenko@kremvax.UUCP
    Newsgroups: net.general,eunet.general,net.politics,eunet.politics
    Subject: USSR on Usenet
    Message-ID:
    Date: Sun, 1-Apr-84 15:02:52 GMT
    Article-I.D.: kremvax.0001
    Posted: Sun Apr 1 15:02:52 1984
    Date-Received: Mon, 1-Apr-84 12:26:02 GMT
    Organization: MIIA, Moscow
    Lines: 41

    Well, today, 840401, this is at last the Socialist Union of Soviet
    Republics joining the Usenet network and saying hallo to everybody.

    One reason for us to join this network has been to have a means of
    having an open discussion forum with the American and European people
    and making clear to them our strong efforts towards attaining peaceful
    coexistence between the people of the Soviet Union and those of the
    United States and Europe.

    We have been informed that on this network many people have given strong
    anti-Russian opinions, but we believe they have been misguided by their
    leaders, especially the American administration, who is seeking for war
    and domination of the world.
    By well informing those people from our side we hope to have a possibility
    to make clear to them our intentions and ideas.

    Some of those in the Western world, who believe in the truth of what we
    say have made possible our entry on this network; to them we are very
    grateful. We hereby invite you to freely give your comments and opinions.

    Here are the data for our backbone site:

    Name: moskvax
    Organization: Moscow Institute for International Affairs
    Contact: K. Chernenko
    Phone: +7 095 840401
    Postal-Address: Moscow, Soviet Union
    Electronic-Address: mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko
    News: mcvax kremvax kgbvax
    Mail: mcvax kremvax kgbvax

    And now, let's open a flask of Vodka and have a drink on our entry on
    this network. So:

                            NA ZDAROVJE!

    --
            K. Chernenko, Moscow, USSR ...{decvax,philabs}!mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko

    1. Re:Russia caught up with the US in 1984 by hughk · · Score: 1

      This was a spoof post, but hilarious at the time. Yes, the Russians has some VAXes but mostly Robotron copies of PDP-11s and VAXes - but nobody would have dared make such a post.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  9. Supercomps vs Botnets by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought Russia was focusing on botnets. Most of these have a lot more processing power than the fastest supercomputers.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
    1. Re:Supercomps vs Botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I thought Russia was focusing on botnets. Most of these have a lot more processing power than the fastest supercomputers.

      The expensive part of supercomputing is not the processors, it's having enough throughput on the backend to feed those CPUs.

    2. Re:Supercomps vs Botnets by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Easy. Spam, fast-flux dick pill hosting, and DDoS workloads are what are technically known as "embarrassingly parallel" workloads.

    3. Re:Supercomps vs Botnets by smithmc · · Score: 1

      1 800-inch penis > 100 8-inch penises.

      Not if you've got 100 women to pork in a limited amount of time, whose vaginas are only 8 inches deep.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  10. Ah, wait, what? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    476 out of the 500 supercomputers on the Top500 list were manufactured in the United States.

    Yeah right! I don't think a single PC has been manufactured, assembled, and shipped from this country in which every component was dug out of the ground, refined, processed, manufactured, packaged, assembled, and distributed, from this country-- Not in a long time. That said, if Russia's so damned worried about our CPU designers, why not recruit a few? I know of at least one that quit the x86 development team from Intel muttering something about "not dealing with a unit of time smaller than a season" after having some nanosecond glitches in a core he was designing... He sounds like a guy who could use a stiff drink. I'm sure you can deliver, Russia.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Ah, wait, what? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Russia has solid CPU designs which are used (unsurprisingly) in military hardware and other special applications. For example, these beauties: http://www.mcst.ru/22-23.htm are nearly indestructible. So there's expertise.

      However, so far Russia lacks expertise required to create fabs.

    2. Re:Ah, wait, what? by nbauman · · Score: 1
      Loren Graham, the MIT professor who probably understood Soviet science better than any other American, described the "blackboard theory":

      Anything you can do with a blackboard and chalk, the Soviets were great at.

      But they can't do anything that requires them to actually make something.

      Graham said that this was ironic for a movement founded on materialism.

      He had an entertaining story about how he went to GUM and asked the saleslady in the electronics department if he could buy a personal computer.

      She said, "Theoretically yes."

    3. Re:Ah, wait, what? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yes, sounds about right.

    4. Re:Ah, wait, what? by hughk · · Score: 1

      Loren Graham, the MIT professor who probably understood Soviet science better than any other American, described the "blackboard theory": Anything you can do with a blackboard and chalk, the Soviets were great at. But they can't do anything that requires them to actually make something.

      I arrived in Russia post Soviet times, in the mid nineties. My Russian colleagues would tell me about the issues with technology. Russians are extremely competent engineers but they are quite conservative. Also their tech was designed for the military. ICBMs may have been America's first market for the microchip, but it was consumer electronics that really drove it.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:Ah, wait, what? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      A computer? Amercians can't even manufacture a pencil.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  11. Money talks IT walks by camcorder · · Score: 1

    If Medvenev offended with IT industry in Russia, he should stop corruption in his country which led money earned from oil and gas to be spent for luxury cars and buildings. If you visit Moscow all you could see expensive cars flooding around but technology in government is years old and not used efficiently. If they have money to buy those cars, they can buy or even produce those CPUs as well.

    He should know that all talents of Russia and brains are going to EU countries and US once they find an option to be employed there for last decase. Still they have enough manpower and knowledge to build those but not enough politicians to drive this move.

  12. Human minds don't compare to THAT human mind. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The SR-71 blackbird was arguably the finest airplane ever built. Nothing before or since has ever matched it.

    It was designed with nothing but a slide rule and paper.

    Don't think these expensive toys are an adequate substitute for the human mind. Or for well trained engineers and mathemeticians.

    Aw, c'mon. There are good reasons that the "stolen alien technology" meme has such staying power, and the SR-71 is one of the biggest. It was ridiculously far ahead of anything else we'd produced. Sure, it was the product of "the human mind", or at least A human mind, but I don't think lumping Kelly Johnson or Nikola Tesla or Leonardo da Vinci in with "the rest of humanity" is especially useful.

    Whatever your level of skill and insight, though, supercomputing can act as a force multiplier for your brain. If you're claiming that real engineers only need a slide rule and paper, or that supercomputing will somehow get in the way of their natural gifts, well, I'm going to have to disagree.

    Oh, and I probably shouldn't be mentioning this, but I've heard rumors that the military actually didn't stop developing newer and faster aircraft technologies after the Blackbird. But don't tell anyone.

  13. AFAIK best fab they've got is old AMD by alexmin · · Score: 1

    I recall couple years ago Russia bought entire decommissioned Dresden AMD fab. Good luck competing using manufacturing processes of yesteryear.
    It seems like the best product of their nanotech push so far are midget kremlin rulers with their delusion of grandeur.

    And yes, I used to know something about semiconductor industry in ex-USSR

  14. The Correct Quote by AnonymousIslander · · Score: 1

    "Therefore, comrade generals, our situation is very difficult," he said.

    There, fixed that for ya Comrade Medvedev. Three cheers for cold-war style rhetoric!!

  15. HAHAHA by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

    Suddenly MikeZ tutorial is playing in my head
    If you get a counter hit, you can do massive damage to the capitalist regime.
    NOBODY IS SAFE FROM THE POWER OF SCIENCE!
    Been playing way to much of it.

  16. Buy SGI by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    So, why didn't Russia buy SGI earlier this year? Instant membership to the supercomputer club.

    Plus, the chance to screw up the SGI logo yet again.

  17. Russian malware is the best in the world by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Who needs supercomputers when you've got million-node botnets?

  18. Essential to Russia's Economic Growth & Divers by javacowboy · · Score: 1

    For those of you that didn't RTFA, this is the bit that put Russia's problem into its proper perspective:

    Although supercomputers are widely used in Western countries to, for instance, build aircraft, Medvedev said few aircraft in Russia have been built using supercomputers. Most of their design today is still being done on paper...

    Contrary to popular misconception, Russia's economy doesn't just depend on oil and gas. It also depends on exporting weapons and other military equipment. For that country to maintain an advantage in the design, development, and manufacture of such military equipment, then they need to make more use of modern technology to do so.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  19. Uh- Hello? by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 1

    Russia already has some of the largest and most powerful cluster computers in the world! All he needs to do is look to the Russian mafia and their collections of zombified computers that they control worldwide!

    "In Russia, th3 p4wned kl0wd z0mb13s 0wnz3d U!"

    --


    Whew! This water sure is cold!
  20. Patriotism and Government, By Leo Tolstoy by Max_W · · Score: 1
    I recently read this article http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/bright/Tolstoy/patriotismandgovt.html , Patriotism and Government, By Leo Tolstoy.

    I read it in Russian, so I do not know about the quality of this translation.

    It sounded very convincing. What it has to do with supercomputers? Try to read the text. The answer is there.

  21. I sure hope they can create that need by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hate an arms-race as much as the next guy, but imagine if all the showmanship from whose nukepeen was bigger in the cold war could go towards supercomputing or fuel efficiency as the primary goal instead of a spin-off.

    No cold war fear, just politicians whipping out their huge... processors... as part of a rallying call.

    So, drop the gauntlet Medvedev, or e-trousers as the case may be.

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
  22. Confused over here.... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    What are "Supercomputer Lead Sparks"? How are they affected by RoHS? ...I think my parser failed on the sentence after that point.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  23. Hard takeoff AI by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, reminds me when I was reading some singularity stuff, and they referenced a "hard" AI takeoff being driven by a rivalry between nations for hardware computing power to drive the birth of the first AI. I agree, it sounds really wacky (and there's a fairly high probability it is), but hell, this could be as important as fire, so I figure it's worth thinking about.

    WTF do they want this computing power for, I wonder

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  24. Politician as Computer Science Expert by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    ... yeah, right.

    Even a moderate load of smarts is enough to figure that it's cheaper to let someone else do the R&D the build a copy. Just look at pretty much all aircraft they've built and compare with ours.

    Either this guy is ignorant to the point of incompetence, or he's just playing wag-the-weenie national ego games. They built stuff very much like ours when we were enemies. They're allies now.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Politician as Computer Science Expert by smithmc · · Score: 1

      ... yeah, right.

      Even a moderate load of smarts is enough to figure that it's cheaper to let someone else do the R&D the build a copy. Just look at pretty much all aircraft they've built and compare with ours.

      Uh... yeah. How did that turn out, again? I forget...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  25. Security by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    I noticed that the speech was given at a Security Council meeting, yet nowhere in TFA did they mention anything about security. President Medvedev talked about building better airplanes but it seems he glossed over the security concerns.

    It's an incredibly huge security issue for them. If our supercomputers spank their supercomputers, then we can decrypt their traffic but they cannot decrypt ours. They might as well just blog their state secrets in clear text.

    Always consider what they're not saying. That's the really important stuff.

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
    1. Re:Security by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Hell, they can't even decrypt Skype.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  26. Competitve drive? by NecroPsyChroNauTron · · Score: 1

    Does that install in the standard 5.25 bay?
    Perhaps I'll get on myself when the prices come down and they stop "sparking".

  27. Yet another time glorious government pushes "high by Kartu · · Score: 1

    First Putin's government pushed "GLONASS" system, an alternative to GPS. Oh, it still doesn't work and nobody expects it ever will.
    Then, Putin's government pushes "Nanotechnologies" thingy, which brings as many results as "glonass" push and becomes one of the popular jokes.
    They also push for "brand new" and "deadly as hell" "Bulava" rocket, which keeps exploding "because of sabotage" and because, "when so many factories are involved in producing it, it's absolutelly impossible to control it's quality" (not a joke, they've really said that)
    Last, but, not least, russian government decides to dethrone USA as "supercomputers creator", by creating "supercomputers" using CPUs produced by US companies.


    Very strong weeds smoke they...

  28. Re:Yet another time glorious government pushes "hi by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Vote parent up. There's a pattern emerging here. It's what a lot of corporate types call an "inability to execute".

    Could be that all these grandiose-but-ultimately-fruitless hare brained schemes are actually a symptom of a more serious underlying malady: a very low self-esteem in the Russian political establishment. This manifests itself in bullying countries in their near abroad, and 19th-century style political posturing when that they REALLY need to do, is knuckle down and do the unglamourous grunt work of building the foundations of future prosperity. Like properly guaranteeing the rule of law for everybody, and not just selectively enforcing the law when it suits the "power vertical"; real political pluralism, independent judiciary, and a thorough and wide ranging crackdown on corruption.

  29. Re:Supercomputers dont compare to the human mind. by smithmc · · Score: 1

    The SR-71 blackbird was arguably the finest airplane ever built. Nothing before or since has ever matched it.

    Nonsense. The SR-71 was really good at doing one thing - flying very high and very fast, in a straight line. How many Gs could it pull? Could it do a Cobra, or a J-turn? In terms of overall aerodynamic maneuvering, the F-15 or -16 or -22, or Su-27 or -35, are vastly superior to the SR-71. (Not that it isn't a massively cool plane, mind you, but "the finest plane ever built" carries with it lots of questions about criteria and standards.)

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!