Slashdot Mirror


MI5 Website Breached By Hacker

Jack Spine writes "UK intelligence agency MI5 has admitted that its website security was breached by hacker group Team Elite. A member of the hacker forum posted details of the hack last week, which took advantage of a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the site's Google embedded search. MI5 admitted the breach on Wednesday, but said that the flaw had not been exploited maliciously."

24 of 71 comments (clear)

  1. Is This Good, or Bad for Mike Corley? by Fleetie · · Score: 2, Funny

    No doubt we'll find out on uk.misc later.

    --
    "Absorbing your worst..."
  2. Better headline by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    MI5 allows websurfing on critical computers.

    Seriously. How else would you get hit by CSS?

    1. Re:Better headline by magsol · · Score: 5, Funny

      />

      BOOM! Hit by CSS.

      --
      "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
    2. Re:Better headline by TaggartAleslayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like how you were modded interesting instead of Funny. Some poor bastard out there is now furiously trying to hack the pentagon with tips from Zen Garden.

  3. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a sort of script-injection vulnerability where you'd have to click on someone else's link to the MI5 site. I suppose it could steal cookies from someone stupid enough to click on a long link from an unknown person, but it's not like the site itself was hacked or anything, which is what "website breached by hacker" strongly implies.

    1. Re:meh by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The exploit is that people, especially in the U.K., will tend to trust results of a search that appear to be emanating from the MI5 website, and hence, with a well-formed set of "search results," a site could be setup that mimicks MI5's, thus tricking people into revealing passwords, credit card numbers, etc.

      Yeah, it's the work 4m4t3ure p0s3rz, but hey, what did you do last week?

    2. Re:meh by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man.. James Bond villains are getting a lot nerdier.

    3. Re:meh by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. James Bond works for SIS aka MI6.

      This would never have happened before Colin was murdered.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Wells_(Spooks)

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  4. simple test by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny

    MI5 admitted the breach on Wednesday, but said that the flaw had not been exploited maliciously.

    If a whole bunch of fake Iraq WMD reports start showing up on the net in the next few days, then we'll know if they were really exploited or not...

  5. Competence by Wowsers · · Score: 2, Funny

    I propose the MI5 website team should be known as the "Mostly Incompetent 5" team !?

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Competence by Iyonesco · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's hardly surprising since the pay at MI5 is abysmal. I requested an information pack during my last year of university but lost interest when I found MI5 was about the worst paying graduate recruiter and especially bad for central London. Given the pay I would imagine that anyone with competence would take a job in the private sector leaving them to scrape up the dregs.

      Still, it was worth requesting the information pack for the entertainment alone because in every one of the pictures all the people were turned away from the camera. It looked thoroughly ridiculous and I couldn't help think that they would have been better not using pictures at all.

    2. Re:Competence by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes yes, but your forgetting one important detail, the information pack you requested is the one they show to the public, they dont want everyone to know about the "real" pay options you get that dont have any type of paper trails, just un-sequenced stacked bills handed to you in a brown paper bag that reads "lunch - extra lettuce".

      As for not looking at the camera, i guess thats just habit to them now... knowing when their picture is being taken and all :-)

      --

      ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    3. Re:Competence by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's hardly surprising since the pay at MI5 is abysmal. I requested an information pack during my last year of university but lost interest when I found MI5 was about the worst paying graduate recruiter and especially bad for central London

      That's not really that unusual for Governmental agencies. I would imagine that most people who go to work for MI5/CIA/Mossad/etc are not doing it for the money.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  6. A bit misleading ... by crowemojo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I see this and think the word "Hacked" gets thrown around a bit too easily. This is an example of non-persistent (also referred to as reflected) cross site scripting. This means that in order to take advantage of it, they have to convince a target to visit their specially crafted link. To me, "Hacked" sort of implies "They got in!" or "Data was breached!" or other such bad things and that simply isn't the case here.

    So what does this type of XSS do? Mostly embarass people because defacement examples are posted to "look what I can do" forums (which is basically what happened). Think about the attack vector here, they have to get a victim to visit their specific url that includes their attack. How is that done? Malicious email, posting the link to some website or forum and hoping they find it and visit, embedding the link in other sites that have been hacked or something like a banner ad, or whatever. All of these involve the target going out of their way to visit this maliciously crafted url. When you consider that they could still do all these things without XSS and simply host malicious code themselves, all this reflected XSS is doing is making it a bit harder for an end user to spot that this is something non-standard and dangerous.

    Think of it this way, "With reflected XSS, I can send them a link, and if they visit it, I can do bad things to their computer!" but then again, you can do that without XSS too, it just isn't quite as effective. How many users are taking the time to carefully look at a link before clicking on it, checking to make sure it contains the domain name they expect and not just an IP address, or a domain name that is similar, but not quite right, etc. A user who is doing this sort of thing will more likely fall victim to this XSS attack, but most users, who don't scrutinize things at that level, were just as susceptible to a classic phishing/malicious linking attack anyways.

    1. Re:A bit misleading ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can inject javascript on a remote page like this, then you can steal their session data and login as them. That sounds pretty serious to me.

      more so when you consider the fact that there is no login form on their entire website. if these hackers can exploit something that doesn't exist, they're truly the cream of the crop. what's next? sql injection on static html?

    2. Re:A bit misleading ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean links like this? http://www.mi5.gov.uk/

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  7. NSA anyone ? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    any "l33t hax0r" in the house brave enought to try this shit on the NSA ?

    considering that i never heard of any snafu from those guys, either their pretty good at sevuring their stuff, or incredibly efficient at snuffing anyone who tries it before news get to public.

    sincerely, i don't know which one is the scariest scenario.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
    1. Re:NSA anyone ? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt the NSA cares. Their public websites arent hosted or even maintained by the people who do their cracking. The probably have a hosting service and if the site gets defaced or goes down, its no big deal. Its not exactly sitting on some high security LAN.

      Websites are the low hanging fruit in the hacker community. Its like spray painting my garage. You can be a jerk if you want to, its just not worth it to obsess over protecting said garage.

  8. Re:Shit it's Neo by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

    How could they ever abuse this "hack" anyway? "Hey man check the MI5 website by following my link here, it's a really cool governmental agency really. Please click!"

    Hey, did you know that someone on the MI5 site with your name is listed as a terrorist. He lives in the (your city) region as well. I'd watch out if I were you, someone might get the wrong idea. Here's a link so you can check it out yourself.

  9. Simple explanation for the security breach by rmav · · Score: 2, Funny
  10. Someone is missing the point by meist3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fort Knox announced today that someone broke in and took a dump on the Gold ... nothing was stolen though.

  11. Oblig. by svtdragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man.. James Bond villains are getting a lot nerdier.

    Somebody beat you to this conclusion.

    1. Re:Oblig. by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you ever see that South Park episode where everything Butters suggests is rebutted with "Simpsons did it!"

      I feel like Randall Munroe my Simpsons; the thorn in my back; the down-mod for offtopic.

  12. In other news... by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    A hacker's apartment in London was invaded by a gang of unknowns. Nothing was stolen, but his computer was smashed, his books urinated on, and the victim suffered a broken leg, torn elbow tendon, and a few cracked ribs after reportedly being waterboarded in his own kitchen.

    --
    This is my sig.