Do you really want a generation of education to be driven by the market forces that come with 60% of Americans uncertain about human evolution? Thirty percent don't believe in evolution at all.
To me, that just seems to provide a way to ensure that any beliefs that your parents have, however divorced from reality they may be, are passed on to you by virtue of their selection of schools.
I, for one, can't wait for the NewsCorp School Corporation.
It must be nice in libertarian la-la-land. Do you guys ever talk to the communists? I hear they had a plan that was predicated upon similar naivete about human nature, and how we can all just band together to accomplish an awesome society, because nobody is too selfish to do something that benefits them at the expense of the common good, right?
Ah yes, the will of the people. Of course it's the will of the people, that's why it has to be enacted through government violence, right? Or....if it was actually the will of the people they would have formed a voluntary association to accomplish the same goal minus the violence and theft.
It's the will of enough of the people that democracy (please, no semantic pedantry) has decreed it. The problem with voluntary associations is that the people who don't like the regulations--typically the people who would be found in violation of them--will just opt out. The fact that a vocal minority feels that regulation impinges on their profits is a good indication that it's still necessary.
Also, re: the Fed... LOL goldbuggery. Even Friedman thought you people were fucking insane.
The reason we don't see health insurance competition across state lines is the concept of a race to the bottom like the one that happened when credit cards deregulated. There's a reason all of the credit card companies are in South Dakota and Delaware now: those are the places with the weakest consumer protection laws. The same will happen with safeguards on health insurance.
In other words, if your state thinks it makes sense for every woman to have access to birth control on a basic health plan and passes a law to that effect, it'll only govern insurers based in that state. So much for states' rights, eh?
Ah, I see now. So you're discounting WWII (and to a lesser extent the WPA and other Depression-era spending pre-1937; you know, when the economy crashed again due to ZOMG-it's-a-deficit budget balancing) as Keynesian stimuli. Which, you know, worked.
And you're discounting the success of Iceland (the un-Austerian country) as compared to the austerity-driven remainder of the world? Or the comparative success of the US relative to Britain (which would be stronger if it weren't for all the states with Republican governors laying off thousands of workers)?
For every case you can give me of purported failure of stimulus, I can provide a broader context; largely, what you would call a failure is because either a) deficit spending was misapplied (it's only necessary in a liquidity trap) or b) it was insufficient to propel a full recovery.
So, in sum, my one-sided tiny mental bubble is comprised of largely evidence-based assessments of global financial track records in previous periods of liquidity-trap crisis. Is yours?
That's the biggest clue, the lack of liberals to properly predict how anything (weather, the economy) will work, while unheeded conservative warnings come true time after time.
You don't read much Krugman, do you? Like the part where he predicted the stimulus would fail because it was entirely inadequate, or how the current austerity push would cause a self-reinforcing cycle of lack-of-growth followed by more austerity? Let alone the predictions he made in the Bush years about things like the Iraq war (but that's admittedly political commentary moreso than economic prediction).
Well, my girlfriend has gone through two iPhones (the 3GS stopped working so she got the 4, which broke within 6 months). She's got a replacement iPhone4 now, and she's taken to calling it her lemon (hurr hurr apple, lemon, hurr hurr) and has fallen in love with her Xoom so she's planning on an Android phone next go'round.
Meanwhile, my 1.5+ year old Droid X is happily humming along next to my brand new shiny Galaxy Nexus, having never had an issue despite several cringe-inducing drops (once into a glass of water). Though the 3G -> 4G upgrade is totally worth it.
$ First they came for Gnome,
$ but I didn't speak out because I wasn't a n00b.
$ Then they came for X,
$ but I didn't speak out because it kind of sucked.
$ Then they came for apt-get,
$ but I didn't speak out because I didn't have root.
$ Then they came for me, and
-bash:/bin/echo: No such file or directory
$
Despite being killed over and over again, somehow this myth that Fannie and Freddie and the CRA were responsible persists. Here's just one instance of it being killed.
If they're responsible, why, then, did the same housing bubble happen in other countries?
I believe so, as the alternative, "asshare," is read by my internal monologue as "ass-hare" which, while it sounds like "ass hair," is spelled like a cousin of "ass rabbit" and that just seems to me like a couple steps up from a gerbil, and neither of those is something I want to contemplate in the context of smartphones.
Which is ironic, since New England is arguably the *least* puritanical area of the country, or perhaps second to the area immediately around San Francisco.
While I agree on principle, there is a problem with this point:
The entire developed world (G8ish, or G20 excluding India and China, for the sake of argument) is in a minority compared to the undeveloped world. This does not imply that the developed world should move backward.
That said, within the developed world, US laws have rarely conformed to what the rest of the world has deemed sensible, and when they have, they've been on a several decade time lag in most cases (e.g., universal healthcare, gay rights, social safety net).
My workstation is an elitebook and I get a couple of bluescreens a day(!). On the other hand, my Dell Precision M70 from 5 years ago runs as good as new... although that may just be the benefit of running Ubuntu at home versus XP at work. But even with XP on my M70, I never had the same kind of issues I have now with the HP.
That's not to say that the EliteBooks (and enterprise-grade systems in general) aren't worlds better than their consumer-grade trash, but still, there are far better options.
People lose all common sense when they're dealing with something they think they're incapable of understanding.
It's not true, by and large, that people would be incapable of understanding if they sat down to take the time to figure it out, but in the cases of such an unequal informational playing field (you and your doctor, you and your mechanic, grandma and her computer tech) people are paying not just for service but for expertise, and that makes them vulnerable to this kind of exploitation.
Although, as an afterthought, I'm curious about what happens if you include the effects of second-hand smoke. That is to say, if one person smokes in a four-person household and causes, say, two cases of lung cancer, does it change the numbers any? The other people were going to die anyway, but what other costs do they incur that they wouldn't have otherwise?
Taxation in some of the cases you mention is win-win: alcohol, pot, etc. Vice taxes work because they add a financial disincentive to an objectively harmful activity (unless you're talking a glass of wine a day, a la Europe) to increase the short-term cost, effectively substituting for obviating the long-term cost.
In other words, we tax cigarettes now to deter you from smoking, but in the event that we can't do that, we use the increased revenues to pay for the increase in health costs that you rack up when you get lung cancer later. And yes, we pay for your lung cancer because you're likely on Medicare.
As to drugs, the idea of "legalize and tax" misses much of the point. That should be "legalize, regulate, and tax," where regulation is the process of telling you, the consumer, what you're getting, which in the case of drugs can minimize things like overdoses.
However, all that's arguably separate from issues like gambling which, while an addictive behavior, is not objectively harmful beyond the addiction. Most other vice taxes are regressive, but they serve a long-term benefit in disincentivizing the often-physically-unhealthy vice, whereas taxing gambling provides the disincentive to an activity that causes little objective harm. This makes gambling unique (at least so far as I can see) among the vices that we'd regulate in this manner.
So what if you took two of them and overlapped them at 45 degree angles? I realize that's not quite descriptive enough to clarify my line of thought, so let me elaborate:
Say I have a cube covered by this thing. When looking at it from a 45 degree angle, I see the cube displaced.
So what if I then take another slightly-larger carpet cloak and prop it up 45 degrees off-axis such that when I look at this outer cloak straight-on, I see "through" the outer cloak, and when I look at it at 45 degrees, I see the inner (invisible) cloak? I imagine the optics for this get mucked up since you're darkening the interior by overlaying the outer cloak... would you just see a dark space displaced to the side?
That's probably still better than revealing whatever's inside.
Package dystopian-copyright-protection is a virtual package provided by:
mafiaa
obscene-censorship
government-intrusion
corporate-greed
ubisoft-games
sony-rootkit-drm
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package dystopian-copyright-protection has no installation candidate
Package dystopian-copyright-protection is a virtual package provided by: obscene-censorship government-intrusion corporate-greed ubisoft-games sony-rootkit-drm
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package dystopian-copyright-protection has no installation candidate
Slashdot Mirror
Do you really want a generation of education to be driven by the market forces that come with 60% of Americans uncertain about human evolution? Thirty percent don't believe in evolution at all.
To me, that just seems to provide a way to ensure that any beliefs that your parents have, however divorced from reality they may be, are passed on to you by virtue of their selection of schools.
I, for one, can't wait for the NewsCorp School Corporation.
It must be nice in libertarian la-la-land. Do you guys ever talk to the communists? I hear they had a plan that was predicated upon similar naivete about human nature, and how we can all just band together to accomplish an awesome society, because nobody is too selfish to do something that benefits them at the expense of the common good, right?
Ah yes, the will of the people. Of course it's the will of the people, that's why it has to be enacted through government violence, right? Or....if it was actually the will of the people they would have formed a voluntary association to accomplish the same goal minus the violence and theft.
It's the will of enough of the people that democracy (please, no semantic pedantry) has decreed it. The problem with voluntary associations is that the people who don't like the regulations--typically the people who would be found in violation of them--will just opt out. The fact that a vocal minority feels that regulation impinges on their profits is a good indication that it's still necessary.
Also, re: the Fed... LOL goldbuggery. Even Friedman thought you people were fucking insane.
Where are my mod points when I need them?
The reason we don't see health insurance competition across state lines is the concept of a race to the bottom like the one that happened when credit cards deregulated. There's a reason all of the credit card companies are in South Dakota and Delaware now: those are the places with the weakest consumer protection laws. The same will happen with safeguards on health insurance.
In other words, if your state thinks it makes sense for every woman to have access to birth control on a basic health plan and passes a law to that effect, it'll only govern insurers based in that state. So much for states' rights, eh?
Ah, I see now. So you're discounting WWII (and to a lesser extent the WPA and other Depression-era spending pre-1937; you know, when the economy crashed again due to ZOMG-it's-a-deficit budget balancing) as Keynesian stimuli. Which, you know, worked.
And you're discounting the success of Iceland (the un-Austerian country) as compared to the austerity-driven remainder of the world? Or the comparative success of the US relative to Britain (which would be stronger if it weren't for all the states with Republican governors laying off thousands of workers)?
For every case you can give me of purported failure of stimulus, I can provide a broader context; largely, what you would call a failure is because either a) deficit spending was misapplied (it's only necessary in a liquidity trap) or b) it was insufficient to propel a full recovery.
So, in sum, my one-sided tiny mental bubble is comprised of largely evidence-based assessments of global financial track records in previous periods of liquidity-trap crisis. Is yours?
And ad-hominem does wonders for your point.
That's the biggest clue, the lack of liberals to properly predict how anything (weather, the economy) will work, while unheeded conservative warnings come true time after time.
You don't read much Krugman, do you? Like the part where he predicted the stimulus would fail because it was entirely inadequate, or how the current austerity push would cause a self-reinforcing cycle of lack-of-growth followed by more austerity? Let alone the predictions he made in the Bush years about things like the Iraq war (but that's admittedly political commentary moreso than economic prediction).
Well, my girlfriend has gone through two iPhones (the 3GS stopped working so she got the 4, which broke within 6 months). She's got a replacement iPhone4 now, and she's taken to calling it her lemon (hurr hurr apple, lemon, hurr hurr) and has fallen in love with her Xoom so she's planning on an Android phone next go'round.
Meanwhile, my 1.5+ year old Droid X is happily humming along next to my brand new shiny Galaxy Nexus, having never had an issue despite several cringe-inducing drops (once into a glass of water). Though the 3G -> 4G upgrade is totally worth it.
$ First they came for Gnome, /bin/echo: No such file or directory
$ but I didn't speak out because I wasn't a n00b.
$ Then they came for X,
$ but I didn't speak out because it kind of sucked.
$ Then they came for apt-get,
$ but I didn't speak out because I didn't have root.
$ Then they came for me, and
-bash:
$
Despite being killed over and over again, somehow this myth that Fannie and Freddie and the CRA were responsible persists. Here's just one instance of it being killed.
If they're responsible, why, then, did the same housing bubble happen in other countries?
I believe so, as the alternative, "asshare," is read by my internal monologue as "ass-hare" which, while it sounds like "ass hair," is spelled like a cousin of "ass rabbit" and that just seems to me like a couple steps up from a gerbil, and neither of those is something I want to contemplate in the context of smartphones.
Am I the only one imagining 3G gerbils now?
3360 Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
1. That's an awful lot of creationist textbook stickers.
2. Why do we care what CowboyNeal thinks of them?
Which is ironic, since New England is arguably the *least* puritanical area of the country, or perhaps second to the area immediately around San Francisco.
And it would be epic on XBOX Live Arcade. :)
While I agree on principle, there is a problem with this point:
The entire developed world (G8ish, or G20 excluding India and China, for the sake of argument) is in a minority compared to the undeveloped world. This does not imply that the developed world should move backward.
That said, within the developed world, US laws have rarely conformed to what the rest of the world has deemed sensible, and when they have, they've been on a several decade time lag in most cases (e.g., universal healthcare, gay rights, social safety net).
If email is the only requirement, why not suggest a company-provided blackberry for work?
This is slashdot. Our effort is minimized when the car analogy is already in the summary.
I think you a word.
My workstation is an elitebook and I get a couple of bluescreens a day(!). On the other hand, my Dell Precision M70 from 5 years ago runs as good as new... although that may just be the benefit of running Ubuntu at home versus XP at work. But even with XP on my M70, I never had the same kind of issues I have now with the HP.
That's not to say that the EliteBooks (and enterprise-grade systems in general) aren't worlds better than their consumer-grade trash, but still, there are far better options.
People lose all common sense when they're dealing with something they think they're incapable of understanding.
It's not true, by and large, that people would be incapable of understanding if they sat down to take the time to figure it out, but in the cases of such an unequal informational playing field (you and your doctor, you and your mechanic, grandma and her computer tech) people are paying not just for service but for expertise, and that makes them vulnerable to this kind of exploitation.
Although, as an afterthought, I'm curious about what happens if you include the effects of second-hand smoke. That is to say, if one person smokes in a four-person household and causes, say, two cases of lung cancer, does it change the numbers any? The other people were going to die anyway, but what other costs do they incur that they wouldn't have otherwise?
Actually, as it turns out, we're both right. Short term costs would fall but long-term would rise as people live longer.
Thanks for the motivation to look it up, though. It's intriguing.
Taxation in some of the cases you mention is win-win: alcohol, pot, etc. Vice taxes work because they add a financial disincentive to an objectively harmful activity (unless you're talking a glass of wine a day, a la Europe) to increase the short-term cost, effectively substituting for obviating the long-term cost.
In other words, we tax cigarettes now to deter you from smoking, but in the event that we can't do that, we use the increased revenues to pay for the increase in health costs that you rack up when you get lung cancer later. And yes, we pay for your lung cancer because you're likely on Medicare.
As to drugs, the idea of "legalize and tax" misses much of the point. That should be "legalize, regulate, and tax," where regulation is the process of telling you, the consumer, what you're getting, which in the case of drugs can minimize things like overdoses.
However, all that's arguably separate from issues like gambling which, while an addictive behavior, is not objectively harmful beyond the addiction. Most other vice taxes are regressive, but they serve a long-term benefit in disincentivizing the often-physically-unhealthy vice, whereas taxing gambling provides the disincentive to an activity that causes little objective harm. This makes gambling unique (at least so far as I can see) among the vices that we'd regulate in this manner.
So what if you took two of them and overlapped them at 45 degree angles? I realize that's not quite descriptive enough to clarify my line of thought, so let me elaborate:
Say I have a cube covered by this thing. When looking at it from a 45 degree angle, I see the cube displaced.
So what if I then take another slightly-larger carpet cloak and prop it up 45 degrees off-axis such that when I look at this outer cloak straight-on, I see "through" the outer cloak, and when I look at it at 45 degrees, I see the inner (invisible) cloak? I imagine the optics for this get mucked up since you're darkening the interior by overlaying the outer cloak... would you just see a dark space displaced to the side?
That's probably still better than revealing whatever's inside.
Package dystopian-copyright-protection is a virtual package provided by:
mafiaa
obscene-censorship
government-intrusion
corporate-greed
ubisoft-games
sony-rootkit-drm
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package dystopian-copyright-protection has no installation candidate
Package dystopian-copyright-protection is a virtual package provided by:
obscene-censorship
government-intrusion
corporate-greed
ubisoft-games
sony-rootkit-drm
You should explicitly select one to install.
E: Package dystopian-copyright-protection has no installation candidate