Slashdot Mirror


Breakthrough in Electricity-Producing Microbe

University of Massachusetts researchers have made a breakthrough with "Geobacter," a microbe that produces electric current from mud and wastewater. A conservative estimate puts the energy output increase at eight times that of the original organism, potentially allowing applications far beyond that of extracting electricity from mud. "Now, planning can move forward to design microbial fuel cells that convert waste water and renewable biomass to electricity, treat a single home's waste while producing localized power (especially attractive in developing countries), power mobile electronics, vehicles and implanted medical devices, and drive bioremediation of contaminated environments."

25 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...welcome our new shit-eating overlords?

    1. Re:I, for one... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're talking about a microbe that can turn bullshit into electricity? I suppose this is the one way that Congress will give power back to the people....

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    2. Re:I, for one... by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, this bacterium was originally discovered feeding off the muck at the bottom of the Potomac River. Make of that what you will....

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    3. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're talking about a microbe that can turn bullshit into electricity?

      Yep. Think about it: This site alone gives as much back as it takes. Sites like Infowars and Freep suddenly become self-sustaining generators. Fox News reduces its carbon footprint to near-zero levels!

    4. Re:I, for one... by JordanL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You bring up a good point. This technology simply liberates the stored energy in feces, which is itself processed from the stored energy in plants.

      I'm always amazed at how little variation there really is in energy production. Really there are only two sources of energy here on earth:

      -Solar
      -Nuclear

      Even geothermal is powered by the heat of the earth's core, which is itself powered by radioactivity. (I guess one could argue that the radioactive elements were formed in a star, making them solar as well, but that's a bit too far for me.)

    5. Re:I, for one... by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tidal?

  2. Some of my favorites... by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    - This story stinks!
    - The OP is full of shit!
    - I get shitty service on my phone now!

    I'll show myself out.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Some of my favorites... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah.

      See, I knew we'd find a use for dark matter!

  3. In other news by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obama calls for "regime change" in the Republic of Elbonia.

  4. And in East Elbonia by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in East Elbonia, they are planning on dominating the world's energy market in 20 years....

  5. this reminds me by hypergreatthing · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it's time to evaluate 2 girls 1 cup for educational reasons...

    Then again maybe not

  6. Needs a new power unit by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    How should we name the unit to represent Joules Per Flush? I vote for the Crapper.

  7. Re:Fantastic by socrplayr813 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As someone who helps to design and manufacture medical devices, I have no doubt that they could be made safely. That said, I doubt I'd be first in line to get one. I think even our current battery technology is sufficient for most implants. Of course, that doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to improve.

    If the technology works out, I do look forward to a home septic system that produces power for me AND saves me from tearing up my yard. (Wishful thinking, yes, but cool nonetheless.)

    Anyway, regardless of whether this technology becomes a commercial success, this kind of stuff could/will be very useful down the road. Great work.

    --
    The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
  8. Great.. by jerep · · Score: 3, Funny

    soon we'll be purchasing dirt and instead of oil, declaring war against third world countries to steal their wastes, and those environmentalists are gonna whine about the smell.

  9. Yes, so fast. by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Geobacter biofilm's "fortuitous" electron-transferring skill, the product of natural selection, suggested a pathway to Lovley - a way he might use selective pressure to increase its capacity to produce power. He and colleagues grew Geobacter as usual on a graphite electrode, providing acetate as food and allowing a colony to form the biologically active slime, or biofilm where electron transfer takes place across the nanowires. But for this new experiment they added a tiny, 400-millivolt "pushback" current in the electrode that forced Geobacter to press harder to get rid of its electrons.

    The result of providing a more challenging environment, within five short months, Lovley notes, was evolution of a beefed-up microorganism that can press at least eight times more electric current across the electrode than the original strain. âoeI'm really happy with this outcome," the microbiologist notes. "It's exceptionally fast feedback to us and a very satisfying result." He adds, "I'm still a little amazed that they make electricity, but I'm happy to be exploring how to harness that ability. I'm sure there'll be applications developed in the future that we canâ(TM)t even envision right now."

    That's halfway down in the article.

    You should try reading things before you try to debunk them. The environment will be created to get the most electricity out of the little microbes, and probably sealed off and not thrown in the dirt. I imagine there may even be filters in place where the waste comes into make sure that any natural predators are weakened or killed to continue allowing the organisms to thrive.

    And they have been studying this organism since 1987, and examining it for electrical production since 2002. I'm glad you're skeptical, but not glad that you're commenting on something you didn't even bother to read.

  10. downside being by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. you get a tingly feeling every time you sit on the toilet, and its not from your feet falling asleep

    2. if your septic tank overflows you're in danger of electrocuting the family dog

    3. you also have to be careful where you piss, or you'll know what its like to urinate on the third rail of light rail system

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Re:Details from the published paper by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's the abstract from the paper (with some line breaks inserted for readability):

    Geobacter sulfurreducens produces current densities in microbial fuel cells that are among the highest known for pure cultures. The possibility of adapting this organism to produce even higher current densities was evaluated. A system in which a graphite anode was poised at 400 mV (versus Ag/AgCl) was inoculated with the wild-type strain of G. sulfurreducens, strain DL-1. An isolate, designated strain KN400, was recovered from the biofilm after 5 months of growth on the electrode. KN400 was much more effective in current production than strain DL-1. This was apparent with anodes poised at 400 mV, as well as in systems run in true fuel cell mode. KN400 had current (7.6 A/m2) and power (3.9 W/m2) densities that respectively were substantially higher than those of DL1 (1.4 A/m2 and 0.5 W/m2).

    On a per cell basis KN400 was more effective in current production than DL1, requiring thinner biofilms to make equivalent current. The enhanced capacity for current production in KN400 was associated with a greater abundance of electrically conductive microbial nanowires than DL1 and lower internal resistance (0.015 versus 0.130 /m2) and mass transfer limitation in KN400 fuel cells. KN400 produced flagella, whereas DL1 does not. Surprisingly, KN400 had much less outer-surface c-type cytochromes than DL1. KN400 also had a greater propensity to form biofilms on glass or graphite than DL1, even when growing with the soluble electron acceptor, fumarate.

    These results demonstrate that it is possible to enhance the ability of microorganisms to electrochemically interact with electrodes with the appropriate selective pressure and that improved current production is associated with clear differences in the properties of the outer surface of the cell that may provide insights into the mechanisms for microbe-electrode interactions.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  12. Obligatory... by theJML · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..."Dennis! There's some Lovely Filth down here!"...

    --
    -=JML=-
  13. Re:More efficient adaptation, but... by socrplayr813 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... what's to stop the microbes from evolving/adapting BACK to the lower output when they're placed in a rich environment (fuel cell, whatever) again? Stupid researchers... they forget that mutation doesn't only occur when they want it to occur and not only in the fashion they desire.

    [sarcasm]You're right. All this research is useless. We should just give up.[/sarcasm]

    I feel like I say this constantly, but I just can't help myself here...

    Just because you don't see a benefit doesn't mean there isn't one. Just because the technology doesn't instantly save humanity from all of its mistakes doesn't mean it's not worthwhile. Even research that never directly leads to a useful commercial application is helpful. Tons of advances have come sideways out of unrelated research. (Also, knowledge for the sake of knowledge is a choice many scientists make and there's nothing wrong with it.)

    If you can't see past your own life, please get away from mine.

    --
    The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
  14. Re:This is no joke! by socrplayr813 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really hope you're kidding (I can't tell).

    While I'm not an expert on the technology, I think I can pretty safely say that everything you said is a load of electrified crap.

    --
    The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
  15. Protestor sign of the future: by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

    "No blood for poop!"

    This joke is 100% recycled via humor-digesting bacteria.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  16. Re:The weekly Green Energy Hype by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree.

    But then again, had /. existed in the 1930's, we would likely have been commenting on the crazy stories about 'Atomic' power being possible. Almost certainly, there would be comments that it's simply a fantasy that won't work. A work of fiction. 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea was just a book. Just as we'd now maybe say, "Hey, didn't they do that in the Matrix|Star Wars|Star Trek?"

    Within 10 years of that fictional /. article, we had figured out how to make an atomic bomb, and 10 years after that the USS Nautilus was built - the first nuclear powered ship. And just a couple of years later, the first public-power-generating nuclear plants came online. If you take all of that, and wrote a story published in the early 30's claiming that this would happen in the next 20-25 years, it would have been as fantastic as anything we can dream up here regarding electricity-producing algae or flying cars or living on the moon.

    I totally agree that there's probably no way we're going to get any significant amount of our energy needs from electricity-producing microbes. Just as we probably won't from solar, wind, or waves alone. But it's just another piece of the puzzle for the future. Oil & coal aren't going away anytime soon, but it is important that we explore other options to push the frontier of what is possible. You never know, there's always a chance that this will be "the next big thing". It's worth at least reading about.

  17. Re:More efficient adaptation, but... by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the paper, "KN400 (the mutant strain) also had a greater propensity to form biofilms on glass or graphite than DL1 (the wild-type), even when growing with the soluble electron acceptor, fumarate." In a fuel-cell enviroment there would be significant survival advantages to forming a biofilm. In order to run its metabolic processes, this intriguing organism needs a terminal electron acceptor in its enviroment. Instead of bringing the acceptor inside (as we do with our terminal electron acceptor, oxygen), Geobacter uses its electrically conductive pili to send its electrons outside.

    An electrode would really be the ideal living enviroment for this organism- it would act as a near-infinite sink for electrons. The mutant strain KN400 seems to be better adapted to living on an electrode, so within the constraints of a fuel-cell environment, the mutant strain should outcompete against the wild strain. In the organism's native enviroment, mud in a riverbed, I'd suspect the wild-type would be more successful, since it does not prefer to anchor itself in a biofilm. In mud, the organism would be better served on the move, making use of metal oxides as it finds them, rather than being tied to one spot and risking depletion (essentially asphyxiating).

    However, in the fuel cell, selection pressure will favor organisms that stick to the electrodes, maximize electron conduction, and minimize internal resistance. Even without the "pushback" current used to drive adaptation of these characteristics, my guess is that the fitness advantages they provide will cause them to be passed on to future generations.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  18. Photos by anukit · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some technical info and photos: http://www.geobacter.org/publications/19487117/

  19. Re:Mostly Fact-free FA by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the abstract for the actual journal article, they report the outputs for their mutant strain as current 7.6 amps per square meter and power 3.9 watts per square meter. Which is to say about 0.76mA per square centimeter, so not a gigantic number, but more impressive than what the parent predicts. One important factor that would make power generation using these microbes more attractive is that you could put them in a fuel cell that has a tremendous surface area to volume ratio.

    Geobacter is an obligate anaerobe, so it does not require- indeed, cannot tolerate- access to the atmosphere, and it is not photosynthetic. You can buy carbon black, which makes a fine electrode, with a surface area to volume ratio of greater than 50 square meters per cubic centimeter. In the described experiment, they grew the bacterium on graphite, so carbon black should not pose an obstacle. A cubic meter of carbon black would have a surface area of about 50 square kilometers, but a mass of about 2 tons. An output of 3.9W/m^2 over 50 million square meters is 195 megawatts, which isn't shabby considering your input would be wastewater. Now, of course, that number is a wildly optimistic figure- good luck covering that much surface area with a bacterial biofilm- but it does suggest that you could produce enough power to say, make a wastewater treatment facility self-sufficient.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."