Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Offline Due To DDoS

The elusive Precision dropped a submission in my lap about a DDoS taking down Twitter running on CNet. It's been down for several hours, no doubt wreaking havoc on the latest hawtness in social networking. Won't someone please think of the tweeters? Word is that both Facebook & LiveJournal have been having problems this AM as well.

39 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. And nothing of value was lost by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If any story deserves that tag, its this.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost by wilsoniya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zomg, how will corporations do their grassroots marketing now?!?!?!

      --
      I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Zantac69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Twitter can have a new slogan: "You never knew how much you didnt need us until we were not there."

      --
      1331461 is only semiprime *sigh* Alas - I am just short of 1337.
    3. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Allicorn · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was "twats".

      So did David Cameron apparently.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
  2. And adding ... by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 4, Funny

    a slashdot effect will certainly help in resolving the troubles.

    --
    ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  3. The Dark Side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is what happens when you anger the googles.

  4. Quick! by erKURITA · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got to re-tweet this!!


    ... oh wait

  5. Re:Nelson ------- by iamapizza · · Score: 5, Funny

    The blogosphere is buzzing about this. The amount of crap being spouted related to this incident is now causing blogal warming.

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
  6. what is twitter? by tritonman · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is twitter? Is that some new web site or something?

  7. aha. by jrothwell97 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So THAT's what Conficker's for.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:aha. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So THAT's what Conficker's for.

      Now I wish I hadn't patched my machines.

  8. In other news... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the nation's IQ spontaneously rose 23 points this morning. Scientists are investigating this puzzling phenomenon but have yet to discover the cause.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:In other news... by jerep · · Score: 2, Funny

      myspace is still holding 32 points of collective IQ, and the medias and entertainments the remaining 78.

      Oh well, its a start :)

    2. Re:In other news... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dimwit! 32 and 78 is 110, and everyone knows 100 is the maximum. So I'm quite happy with my 90 score!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:In other news... by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you kidding? I've been obsessively reloading status.twitter.com since I got in this morning!

    4. Re:In other news... by recharged95 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also: unexpected power surge across the nation today as everyone reports Twitter is down.

      imagine the amount of power being used (on data centers, routers, switchboards, computers, monitors, data lines, cellphone lines, radio towers, TV stations, newspaper centers, printing presses, etc...) just to spread the word there's a 404 error on www.twitter.com?

  9. Oh No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...what will Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore do?

  10. Re:Who is hitting it that hard? by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that segway was about as awkward as some kind of two-parallel-wheeled auto-balancing minute-muscle-movement-controlled vehicle. Of some sort.

  11. What we will do now? by sxedog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally. now everyone can get back to work.

    --
    If it ain't broke, DON'T fix it.
    1. Re:What we will do now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah, we'll sit online blogging about it all day.

  12. Re:Confirmed by Twitter by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Funny

    And now you've /.ed them just for fun :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  13. Re:Defcon to blame? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Say about Defcon what you want. Yes, it lost its edge. Yes, it got watered down. Yes, it's not the top notch hacker con it used to be. Yes, it's been turned into the BH stepchild-still-in-puberty.

    But even there nobody is yet so low to consider Twitter a worthy target.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing of value was lost -- social networking is about as important as celebrity gossip.

    Cue James Earl Jones:

    I find your lack of faith disturbing. The ramifications of social networking have yet to be truly felt in the outer colonies. Communication is key to productivity and morale of the people. The Emperor is a fool to take it away and not realize it for the tool that it is. It is also quite helpful to keep tabs on the new T-17. Hot little number there. If the rebel alliance is to be deterred we must know where they are, what they're doing at all times, what they're currently dining on, when they've returned from the bathroom, and how they're wearing their hair today. Twitter is the key.

    Do not fail me again.

  15. Costly by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This could be an expensive attack. There are estimates that just a few hours without social networking could lead to billions of dollars in increased productivity.

    Imagine if Slashdot went down. Spam would be wiped out in a day, Linux audio would be bug free in a week, and next month we'd see the release of GNU Hurd.

    1. Re:Costly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget Duke Nuke'm Forever!

    2. Re:Costly by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This could be an expensive attack. There are estimates that just a few hours without social networking could lead to billions of dollars in increased productivity. Imagine if Slashdot went down. Spam would be wiped out in a day"
      Your post advocates a

      (X) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (X) vigilante

      approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
      (X) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would see increased use
      ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
      (X) It requires brute force attacks
      ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
      (X) Users of slashdot will not put up with it
      ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
      ( ) The police will not put up with it
      ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
      ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
      ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
      ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
      ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      (X) Laws expressly prohibiting it
      ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
      ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
      ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
      (X) Asshats
      ( ) Jurisdictional problems
      ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
      ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
      ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
      (X) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack Oh, wait, it relies on that.
      ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
      (X) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes Oh, wait, it relies on that.
      ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
      ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
      ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
      ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
      ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
      ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
      ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
      ( ) Outlook

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
      been shown practical
      ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
      ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
      ( ) Blacklists suck
      ( ) Whitelists suck
      ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
      ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
      ( ) Sending email should be free
      ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
      ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
      ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
      ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
      ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
      ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      (X) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work, but it's the closest I've seen.
      ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
      ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your
      house down!

  16. Re:It's kinda back... by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Funny

    twwweeeeeeeeeee...eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...eeeeee...eet!

  17. In other news... by cjb658 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...office productivity is up 50 percent today.

  18. Twitter crashes for 90 minutes, nerds horrified by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny
    Twitter.com crashed on Thursday at about 3pm BST due to a "denial of twat" attack from thousands of virus-infected Windows PCs under the control of terrorist masterminds.

    Stephen Fry has been hospitalised and is queueing messages from his PatientLine text terminal in readiness for the site returning. "Twatter ++ungood sweeties zomg I do believe I'm feeling a little faint."

    The source of the attack is unknown, but is hypothesised to be either the Russian Mafia, the Iranian security forces, the Chinese government or Alan Davies recoiling from his latest humiliation on QI.

    News agencies around the world condemned the attack, which hits at the root of their online news-gathering processes, and have had to resort to following the Wikipedia "Recent Changes" feed. "Apparently BUSH IS GAY LOLOLOL," says the current CNN front page headline. "Who knew?"

    A new site, "Grunter," has attempted to take up the slack. Users of "Grunter" are freed from the wordy excesses of Twitter's 140-character limit and can post one of twelve pre-programmed onomatopoeic noises, such as "mmrph," "huh," "grah" or "tubgirl."

    Popular teenage angst poetry blogging and fan fiction site LiveJournal was affected by a similar attack at about the same time, but that attack was considered "just as well, really."

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  19. My First thought was this by BOUND4DOOM · · Score: 3, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

    1. Re:My First thought was this by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're talking about twitter. This is the equivalent of running a steam roller over a chipmunk farm: Somewhat disturbing, oddly hilarious, and ultimately a loss of nothing but a bunch of chattering rodents.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    2. Re:My First thought was this by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what some poeple say about slashdot.

      At least slashdot gives loud mouthed assholes like me more than 140 characters to express our opinions that nobody else cares about ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  20. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by haifastudent · · Score: 2, Funny

    then again, how many slashdotters actually RTFA?

    What is that A in there for? Is there some part of this whole slashdot thing that I'm missing?

    --
    Thank for reading to the sig. You may stop reading now. It is safe. There is no more content. Why are you still reading?
  21. All those "I've having X for lunch" tweets by sarkeizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...lost! Oh the humanity.

    Perhaps this is just me but...probably what you had for lunch is pretty low on most peoples "care-dar". When I get together with my friends...know how often we talk about lunch...almost never. Know how may SMSs I've received about peoples lunch? or IMs or emails for that matter? Those figures hang pretty close to zero too. But Twitter? From my modest sampling of tweets it seems like it's pretty close to mandatory to shoutout about your ingestibles. I can think of some reasons for why this particular subject comes up but the real revelation for tweeters (or twits or whatever you call yourselves) should be that MOST OF YOU ARE REACHING PRETTY DAMN FAR TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING TO TALK ABOUT!!

  22. Re:Nelson ------- by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Funny

    OTOH, Mod parent up would be a good name for a rock band.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  23. Re:Nelson ------- by MrCrassic · · Score: 3, Funny

    No it wouldn't.

  24. Re:HTML5 demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am a twitter engineer and I thought that too, but when I looked at the HDS-4 switch network it was placed in promiscuous mode. All I did w

  25. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's posting from over 2000 years in the past, and you're quibbling over a single hour?

  26. Re:Oh come on. by Eil · · Score: 2, Funny

    On top of that,

    "it's probably not a coincidence that they all coincide"

    makes me want to break pencils and kick puppies.