Slashdot Mirror


Finding New and Unintended Ways of Playing Games

Ronald Diemicke writes "World of Warcraft players sometimes hang out in front of Ironforge and dance. Fallout 3 players seek out new and elaborate ways of destroying their avatar. Brawlers in Smash Brothers have an itchy pause finger, ready to catch any humiliatingly hilarious screengrabs. The thugs running rampant in Grand Theft Auto are putting Evil Knievel to shame by using a full assortment of vehicles to pull off some incredible stunt work. Personally, I like to collect and move things. My favorite is making piles of bodies in any game that lets me move them around. Ever catch yourself doing something in-game that isn't exactly part of the game, or just something really dumb?"

63 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. I like to get the first post on news forums by MrRTFM · · Score: 5, Funny

    instead of reading articles, it is more fun to be the first to comment on it without knowing what I am talking about

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
  2. Dumb AND obsessively repetitive... by choovanski · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was introduced to (pre-WOW) Warcraft I would annihilate a level by _almost_ completing it. For example, if a requirement was that I needed three buildings to clear the level I'd only build two. Then I'd put the peons to work chopping down every tree, emptying every mine, sucking up every last bit of oil... Once there was nothing more that could be done to rape the landscape THEN I'd move on to the next level. Don't ask me why, it wasn't exactly fun sitting there waiting for them to finish. I just had the urge to take it ALL... I think I was meant to be an upper level executive instead of an admin. :P

    1. Re:Dumb AND obsessively repetitive... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is just a symptom of hoarding disorder. Likewise the article in the summary. For whatever reason, some people just can't feel good without FINISHING. A Warcraft level is finite, the real world much less so. What would happen if the completion counter on GTA3 (or whatever game) only went up to 99% and never 100%? Imagine the groaning and gnashing of teeth! And if the reason was revealed as "some developer with a subversive sense of humor made it so nobody could get 100% complete?" Oh, my, there would be blood. The real krovvy kind, not the kind that turns to green when you hit the parental guidance icon.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Dumb AND obsessively repetitive... by pbhj · · Score: 4, Funny

      You feel threatened by the potency of a male figure in your life, probably your father.

      If I were Freud I'd say you want to sleep with your mother too, but I'm not.

    3. Re:Dumb AND obsessively repetitive... by shentino · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Short of hacking your save file, it's a good way to beef up your resource counters.

    4. Re:Dumb AND obsessively repetitive... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did the same in pretty much every game. I have to kill every monster, collect every powerup, and do everything possible. And I can tell you the causes of this with a very nice example. (I have forgotten the details, so I will fill in my own.)

      There is an old movie, where there is a imminent nuclear explosion. And the women in the household, just starts to clean everything in the house to total perfection. Because her mind can't stand the "chaos". She feels the extreme urge to order that chaos. So instead of running to a bomb shelter, she dies ironing shirts in the living room.

      Find out what gave you the urge.

      I have a well-proven method to find it: When you are doing the "landscape raping", stop for some seconds, and concentrate on the bad feeling that that gives you. Try to do as much as possible to strengthen that feeling. (Create congruence.) Like adding other things to the situation (or removing them). Jump right in the middle of the feeling. And get it to the absolute maximum.
      Yes, it will hurt. and your subconscious will fight it tooth and nail. Which is why it's much easier, when you have someone who can keep you on that path, while not bringing in his own (possibly twisted) influences. Also it means that you have to be in an environment, where you can really act out the stuff. It must be OK, even if you flip out, destroy half the room, do "perverse" things, or cry like a baby. (Shame is the natural enemy here.)
      This usually re-activates old (=weak) neural associative pathways, that once were created when the original source of the problem happened. Which means those old things suddenly pop up and reappear in your mind.
      Now beware that more often than not, there are many steps to re-activate, and the first thing is usually not the original source. Which means that you can only be sure to have reached the real source, when after a long time, you still don't get to a next step. Which is unrealistic, because it takes very long. But prepare for your first "final source" to not actually be the final one, and having to do the whole thing even deeper, when you find out that it's still not really solved. (These intermediate "sources" usually are re-traumatizations that added something to it. Often they also are *partial* "final sources", because there is more than one final cause.)
      Anyway... when you have reached that final source/cause, you usually see a huge range of things in your life, that are very twisted, and have nothing to do with how you thing it would make sense to react. WRITE THEM ALL DOWN! (In a tree-like mind-map. I recommend paper, or the FreeMind mind-mapping software [open-source]) This again is a process where you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for those "twisted" things. To really get them all.
      Once you have that map of your not-so-rose-colored glasses, you can start to re-train yourself. Which means that every time you get to such a situation, you (usually) automatically notice that what you would do now, is something that makes no actual sense, but only in the context of that "twist". So you do what you *actually* think makes sense.
      This again is a hard process, because you fight against age-old habits. So reward yourself generously, get as much mental strength / love from your loved ones as possible, and just expect it to hurt to fight it, until you are over the top of the mountain (a more accurate description than "out of the woods"). And don't let this stop you. :)
      It will take time to re-train yourself. And the stronger the new impressions, the more you learn, and thereby the faster it goes. But keep your personal balance between "too hard" and "too easy", to keep the acceleration at a maximum. It's no help when you get completely off the "road" because you were too fast.
      Allright. Good luck. And try it with a professional, if needed. (Just beware that most professionals actually can *also* get to a level where it's too much for them. They are only human, even if they are trained to stand it. But that is their fault, and you do not have to take this into consideration. If needed, find a better/stronger/stabler one. After all, you're paying for it.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  3. Explorer by omnilynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure if this really counts because often it fits in with the intent of the game, but I like to completely explore everything. Especially if there's a map that gets filled in as I explore; I will happily criss-cross a bare desert if it's the last uncharted corner of the map. It really clues you in on the quality of the game: the best games are the ones where the designers stuck all sorts of cool little things away in corners for people like me to find. The worst games are the ones where none of the doors open but the ones you need to reach the next story point.

    --
    ceci n'est pas une .sig
    1. Re:Explorer by WinterSolstice · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same here - for me, it's part of why Ultima stood so far above the rest.

      I get any game, doesn't matter what, and I'm always trying to hop onto buildings, fall off maps, find new KOS zones, etc. Usually long before it makes sense for my character to be in a zone or area, I'm there. Sneaking around, harassing NPCs.

      Oblivion is one of my all time favorites for exactly this reason. I've explored probably every inch of that game. Right now, I'm visiting and taking screenshots all over LOTRO, though there are less hidden wonders than I'd like (the river basin with two opposing waterfalls is funny, though. Where's the water *go*?)

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what bothered me about WoW. There are places (such as the southern reaches of the Eastern Kingdoms) where you can swim around the continent and up onto hidden beaches and up into valleys, but there's nothing there. No gold. No creatures to kill. No NPCs to interact with. It's like it was created to be a secret spot, but they forgot to reward the player for spending the time and effort to get there.

    3. Re:Explorer by RalphSleigh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Were there any non trivial reward everyone would go there...

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    4. Re:Explorer by bertok · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's why I stopped playing WoW.

      My strategy has always been the same: I liked to find the ultimate 'combo' and push my character far beyond what the original designers intended. For example, in WoW I played an Alchemist Paladin - the theory being that by using Paladin shields and spells, I could survive just long enough in high-level zones to pick some uber herb, make uber potions, and then use said potions to turn myself into the Ubermensch. I could pull it off too. I was able to go into zones 10 levels above me, and walk out with bags full of herbs. I did things like jump off cliffs on low-level zones into corners of high level zones while shielded, so I would be able to pick the one herb that was there out of range of any monsters. I carefully waited for patrols of elite mobs to wander past, and I'd carefully sneak past them into high-level zones.

      My strategy would have worked, except that Blizzard put in totally artificial limits into the game, so that if you did manage to cleverly set your character up like that, it wouldn't actually do you any good at all. The best strategy (in terms of efficiency) by far was always to grind roughly equal level mobs while doing boring quests (kill X of Y mobs). That pissed me off. The game actively forced you to play in a boring, linear, repetitive manner. Creativity was not only discouraged, but in many cases virtually impossible.

      I'm sure they did it to prevent 'twinking', or 'exploiting', or whatever, but it made the game deadly boring for me. I much prefer games like Nethack, where you can find a wand of wishing after playing the game for 3 turns, and still die four turns later. (Yes, it happened to me. I now know that I shouldn't wish for artifacts that blast the wielder with their power when picked up if I'm still at level 1.)

    5. Re:Explorer by dhasenan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you need a non-trivial reward *not related to gameplay*. An exceptionally beautiful scene, for instance. Or an old woman sitting on her front porch with fifty times as much dialog as a typical character, just talking about her life and the things she's seen and the places she's been.

      It has to be something you can't take with you, but there should be a reward.

    6. Re:Explorer by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Guild wars gives you rewards for that. Not only do you get titles for poking around everywhere, they occasionally put some neat-looking stuff in places where there's no game-connected reasons to go.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Designing a SIMS home-improvement by Announcer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've used The Sims (1) to create some rather nice and pseudo-realistic drafts of some ideas my wife and I have for an expansion/remodel of our house. It worked quite well, despoite the limitations of this version of the game. Just create some random Sim, plop him on the property, pause the game, use the "rosebud;!;" cheat to rack up the Simoleans, and go to town.

    I also used it to create sketches of a future radio station facility:
    http://www.wphafm.org/concept

    All done with The Sims (1)

    I would like to try this with the Sims 2, seeing it provides much more flexibility and realism for such things. For now, though, those are my major "out-of-game" adventures. ;)

    --
    Willie...
    1. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I seem to recall an interview with Will Wright that mentioned that he was told that he was tasked with making a program to do exactly what you described, but to also test design efficiency of floor-plans. The end result became "The Sims". He was essentially tricked into making a game.

      So no surprise that you ended up using it for exactly that, designing buildings.

      Did you actually use the sims in the game to test floor-plan efficiency?

    2. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by johncadengo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really? I had no idea.

      I'd always thought the point of Sims was to build elaborate swimming pools, take out the ladder, and watch your sims drown to death. Or my other favorite, surround the sims with four walls but no exits. And watch them starve. If I were feeling generous that day, I'd make a window or paint the walls.

      Heh heh heh.

      --
      My page.
    3. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jeez, a little imagination please.

      Try taking two Sims (or better yet, many!) with opposing personalities, then bricking them into a room with nothing but a toilet and an espresso machine.

      "Get the fuck out, asshole. I need to take a leak!"

      "Really? You sure you just don't want another Caramel Machiatto ?"

      It's the only way I've actually made a Sim I didn't control kill another Sim (gotta love them neighbors!). It takes about 10-15 fist-fights, but eventually one takes a permanent dirtnap. I even had BOTH Sims fall asleep in the middle of one of them fist fights once because there was no bed. Ball of Fury, then pow!, interrupted script and two Sims sleeping in puddles of piss.

      The funniest part is watching the "totally surprised" reaction of the Sim that did the killing when the Grim Reaper shows up.

      "Oh sure, it's all fun and games until someone gets hurt!"

    4. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by DreamMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of one of my all time favourite comics, from the www.vgcats.com website:
      http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=122

      Titled 'Fire bad, FIRE BAD!' :)

    5. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? I had no idea.

      I'd always thought the point of Sims was to build elaborate swimming pools, take out the ladder, and watch your sims drown to death. Or my other favorite, surround the sims with four walls but no exits. And watch them starve. If I were feeling generous that day, I'd make a window or paint the walls.

      Heh heh heh.

      That's because this is largely a perception issue. There have always been well designed games and poorly designed games and the more than half of them have always been poorly designed games because video game creation is a complex mix of art and science and computers a relatively new discipline. What does change is the perception of the players however. When you were a kid some poorly designed games were enough to hold your attention because you didn't mind doing the same thing over and over or it had Star Wars written on the side of it. As we grow older we expect our entertainment to mature with us and so we remember the amount of fun we were provided as a kid and the amount of fun we are provided now and through comparison find today's games lacking. It's the curse of nostalgia that affects all sorts of art forms (e.g. Movies, TV, Video Games, Literature) and leads to phrases like "way back when" and "the good old days".

      To be sure there are waves of quality in any medium but they are hard to recognize within a single generation and much like the record of political leaders can only truly be judged in a historical context which is why since the beginning of time grandpa has liked the "things these damn kids are doing".

    6. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jean-Paul Sartre would be proud.

    7. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Sims 3 I would always create a neighborhood psychopath, whose sole purpose was to lure the neighbors into his basement, build walls around them to form a cell with one window, and then paint their resulting agony (you essentially make a first-person screenshot your painting). He would then hang the paintings on the wall of his fabulously gothic hall. The Sims would beat their fists on the window to be let out and those made the best paintings by far. Adult Sims would eventually perish and you could paint their death, but child Sims would live forever in the dungeon.

      Another habit was to make a "white trash" family that would try to break up every marriage on the block by inviting married couples over and then seducing them.

    8. Re:Designing a SIMS home-improvement by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It makes me wonder if there are parallel worlds created where this sort of thing happens all the time.

      Yes, there are.

      Any conceivable universe exists in some parallel. Every story written, game played, world imagined, and possibility contemplated exists somewhere in the multiverse.

      That is one of the things I enjoy keeping in the back of my head as I play games like Fable, Oblivion, Fallout, and Neverwinter Nights, and pretty much any game in which you have a world you can influence. Played Black & White? You are a god to some civilizations out there, just not in this aspect of the multiverse, so don't get your ego too inflated.

      This can lead to interesting philosophical questions. If the world I was just running around Bowerstone Old Town summoning up Lvl5 Undead with safety mode off and letting them roam around slaughtering everyone really exists, does that have an effect my karma? Does the world where I am loved by all and have vanquished every last scrap of evil couterbalance it? What happenes after I save and quit for the final time, does the world go on without me, or does it wait for the day I might return?

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
  5. Emergent behavior by S3D · · Score: 3, Informative
  6. superbounce by Panzor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    man, I must have spent a whole summer in halo 2 superbouncing and rocketlauncher-sword zooming (I forget what we called that) to see where I could get on maps. I hated it when people did that in ranked matches though.

    I think we do these things because it's a new way to play a familiar game. Games get old and new games can be fun - especially when all your friends are already playing them - and you're tired of the "real" game.

    Take a game like halo: standard shoot-em-up. Now you're practically free-running with superhero-like glitches flying you around the map juuuuust short of that one ledge. *runs around and tries it again*

    It's just a matter of time before someone mentions machinima. Machinima is awesome. Most noteable is Red vs. Blue (another halo ref, I'm sorry) - a fan machinima that's been going for YEARS and even got it's most recent full-length film put into CANON. I couldn't believe that when I heard it. You know what, I just tried to get a citation and couldn't (going off of what my friend said). Who can confirm/deny that claim? I'd appreciate it.

    Tricks and machinima. I think game developers (at least at Bethesda(spelling) and Rockstar games) are quickly realizing that sandboxy games are an easy way to let the gamers' imaginations add 100s of playing hours.

  7. sims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always found it amusing to try to get straight female sims into lesbian relationships.

    You could get them to be best of friends and then ...

    Never worked, but it was fun trying.

  8. These guys... by Xtense · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...have absolutely nothing on the admins of it-he.org

    Read their Ultima sections.

    Reeeead them.

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
  9. warthog jump! by Chalex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This video was really popular around 6 years ago! Warthog jump

    I also remember my college friends spending all their time shooting seagulls in Metal Gear Solid for the PS3.

    1. Re:warthog jump! by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

      This video was really popular around 6 years ago! Warthog jump

      Someone went to the next logical step and made a flash game out of it.

      --
      I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
  10. Finding glitches... by Aliotroph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and things that shouldn't be there! Sure, the regular easter eggs are fun, but it's more fun finding interesting ways to break a game or finding ways to end up somewhere that teaches you a bit more about how the game was constructed. TFA mentions suiciding in FO3. It sure is fun to shoot up a pile of cars and go flying (the best one is just west of the Arlington Library, on the freeway). The neat side effect of this is your corpse bouncing off the skybox. That's also the disappointing effect -- it limits how far you can fly.

    I was particularly impressed when my brother called me over to show me how he figured out how to jump out of the train in Half-Life. My friends played that game for years and never found that little gem. Weirdness ensues when you leave the confines of the train and confound the scripts.

  11. Ultima Online... by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Informative

    My best in-game friend letting me kill her over and over, then chop up her corpse(s) to supply me with body parts which were needed to take advantage of a bug that allowed you to place objects on the walls of a house.

    It got to the point we were having to get creative to kill her as fast as possible. A pet White Wyrm turned out to be the best method. One Bite-Death. If he got hungry, I could feed him some of the body parts as well.

    "Whoa! How'd you get all that stuff to hang on the wall?"

    "You really want to know?"

  12. Pro Roping by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The roping community from Worms: Armageddon and World Party abuse the ninja rope in ways the developers certainly never anticipated.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQeNMD95lrE

    ...

    /msg xOaPxJacky wiptistean
    PACK: !Piles, AFR, CBA, KTC
    gl+hf

  13. WoW gold farmer spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few weeks ago the gold farmers got a bunch of level-1 characters, all dressed alike, to lie down in a major city, then I guess got a high-level from the opposite faction to come in and kill them - so the bodies all spelled out a website URL. I wasn't there when it happened, just saw the results. I assume it happened on most of the other servers and for both factions, but I have no direct knowledge of that.

    In WoW, a dead body sits around for quite a long time if the player doesn't resurrect. A level-80 mage or other character with an area-of-effect spell could most likely run in, avoiding combat until in range of the level-1's all lined up, then just fire a few quick blasts while running up the line and they all drop dead.

    I tried to think of ways to move the bodies, there are a couple spells that can affect corpses, but I don't know if anyone tried to do it. Lying down or standing a large mount over them sort of messed it up, lighting fires or planting flowers really didn't do much. Eventually the bodies started disappearing as Blizzard cleaned it up. They did it again a few days later.

    1. Re:WoW gold farmer spamming by Norsefire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's WoW's client-server model that allows that to happen. The client tells the server where your character is, so if you hack the client to tell the server that you're 50 mile in the air then it really thinks you are 50 mile in the air, but on the plus side really bad lag doesn't stop you from moving. The trick you mention has been being done for a couple of years now, a gold-selling site had a contest where they would pay some amount of money ($1,000 maybe?) for the best gold-selling advertisement idea (after Blizzard implemented all the anti-gold spam measures), that was the winning idea. GMs usually bury the corpses soon after it happens though.

  14. StarCraft with nothing but the most useless units by crucifer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually finished SC and BW campaigns doing nothing other than zerglings for zergs, zealots for protoss and firebats for terran (marines are too powerful; so I decided to go for firebats). The entire game was quite easy even with this unit choice handicap. But when I arrived at the last mission of the expansion pack of BW. It was hell. The mission is as follow : You need to kill 3 overminds; each one with a special ability : 1- Your entire base is surrounded by invulnerable sunken colonies. The only way to reach that overmind is through a very long path of invulnerable sunken colonies. 2- Once ever 2-3 minutes a boss ultralisk would spawn and attack your base. That ultralisk takes only 1/2 HP damage per firebat hit, has 800HP and kills the firebat in a single hit. 3- Guardians and mutalisks attacks. Pretty hard to kill guardians with turrets since they have bigger ranger than turrets. I spent 8 hours in that single mission. I mined almost every last mineral of the map (some I couldn't reach because I could not build shuttles). t was absolutely awful, but I couldn't stop there. I HAD to be able to say I finished the entire game building nothing but the most basic units of the game.

  15. Interesting Discussion by Hojima · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've never really realized how subconsciously evil I am until this topic was brought up. I'm usually a care-bear when it comes to online play, but when it comes to computers, I'm a total dick. For instance, in Spore I would pay all my allies to fight against each other in an effort to start a mindless massacre. In Oblivion, I would kill a whole town by using command humanoid to gather them, then casting a giant frenzy spell to start a mindless massacre (you can start to see the trend there). Then in other strategy games, I like to destroy everything except their main base. Then I build up a massive army of the strongest artillery, surround it, and then blast the bajesus out of it.

    1. Re:Interesting Discussion by sopssa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its fun to be a dick. In games its easier and theres no consequences in it and in single player games you wont be ruining anyone elses game either.

      This is partly why I love physics games too. Its fun to build, destroy, smash and do something unexceptable to see the results. Physics games probably fit this category the best because they're made to play around with.

      Sometimes I also dont want to get into some epic story but just have a bit of fun. Good physics engine + Good and responsive AI and the fun begins.

    2. Re:Interesting Discussion by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think everyone does that to some degree. In civilizations you turn off "domination" victory, beat the last guy to one city, completely surround it with artillery, send in spies to destroy any building and sabotage production of any units, build cities all around it so it has no resources.

      In fallout I am busy trying to kill every non-generic character I can in capitol wasteland. I also do this often with "Way of the samurai." I like games where you can choose to kill almost every character and it affects the story.

      Hey, I don't do it in real life, I'm curious.

    3. Re:Interesting Discussion by sam0vi · · Score: 4, Funny

      That reminded me of the times I played Lemmings in my 386. Whenever i got bored or frustrated I would just put two lemmings in "guard" mode right where they came out into the level, and after getting them all packed into the 3 or 4 pixels left between the guards, I would hit the suicide button and watch all of those lemmings blow up. It was like fireworks! Pretty fireworks!

      --
      When my Karma level reaches 0 I feel in piece with the Universe
    4. Re:Interesting Discussion by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh my. This topic brings back great memories such as:

      ATARI- Asteroids. Playing "chicken" with the boulders.

      ATARI- Asteroids. Eliminate all the boulders except one, and then take-on the UFO in a one-on-one gunfight.

      ATARI- Berzerk. Hide behind a ball, fire at it, and watch the robots walk into it. I imagined that my laser fire was magnetizing the wall and drawing-in the metal beasts.

      ATARI- Pitfall 2. Go the highest possible level. Jump. Watch Pitfall Harry fall for 2 minutes.

      ATARI- Freeway/Frogger. See how many times I could make my chicken or frog get run over by cars.

      C=64 - Beach Head 2. Get behind a machine gun and kill the little soldiers so I could hear them scream "Ahhhh I'm hit," or "Help! Medic!"

      C=64 - Elite. Wait until I was superpowerful, attack the landing station, and then have fun killing-off the weak pathetic police ships.

      AMIGA- Firepower. Take my tank and run over soldiers so I could hear them go "squish" and spill their blood all over the landscape.

      AMIGA- Stunt Car Racer. Ride to the top of a "hump" in the track, moving at full speed, and fly into the air. Watch car get destroyed.

      PS1 - Final Fantasy 7 or 9. Strip all the materia off my characters, and then run into a boss fight. Enjoy the slaughter.

      PS2 - Dirt-to-Daytona, Nascar Heat - Run my car on Talladega in the reverse direction, and ram directly into the "pack" of cars.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Interesting Discussion by julesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      That reminded me of the times I played Lemmings in my 386. Whenever i got bored or frustrated I would just put two lemmings in "guard" mode right where they came out into the level, and after getting them all packed into the 3 or 4 pixels left between the guards, I would hit the suicide button and watch all of those lemmings blow up. It was like fireworks! Pretty fireworks!

      Wait... you mean that's not how lemmings was supposed to work?!

    6. Re:Interesting Discussion by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite is in Freespace 2. Just start friendly firing nonstop on 1 ship, and soon enough they call you a traitor and start shooting the bejesus out of you. But on some missions you can actually kill all of your allies and destroy a capital ship or two. And then after you warp back to base, the debriefings are always different....like "you will be executed at 0800 tomorrow and we all hope you burn in hell, traitor" or "in light of your recent assassination attempts, we are putting you in a facility for the medically derangedn where we will get to the bottom of this, traitor".

      It's still my favorite game of all time.

  16. Operation Flashpoint by Laser+Dan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always liked playing coop Operation Flashpoint with friends, there was a particular map where the enemies had 2 or 3 tanks next to each other with the drivers standing next to them. The map was supposed to operate with you fighting the tanks with RPGs etc as the drivers would jump in as soon as you were detected, but we found that you could put everyone in a jeep, then drive full speed at the camp and if you were lucky you could run over the drivers before they got in the tank. Then everyone jumps in the tank, blows up the enemy tanks before they can turn the turret, and go on a rampage in a mission where you aren't supposed to have a tank. Soo much fun.

    There was another mission where you could steal a helicopter in a similar way.

    Sometimes it would take many tries to do it without someone being killed, but it was so worth it!

  17. Daggerfall by Drasil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Daggerfall I used to enjoy finding routes around town that minimised the time I spent on the ground. Why simply walk down the street when you can run along hedges or leap from rooftop to rooftop? Using magic would have been cheating of course.

    1. Re:Daggerfall by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Daggerfall engine wasn't the best though... I remember getting climb up and it ended up hurting my game more than helping. I would climb up doors in dungeons and end up in "The Void."

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  18. Re:StarCraft with nothing but the most useless uni by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Funny

    WTF dude? Why did you 'HAVE' to do this? In another age, you would have been a bomber aircrew with a singleminded determination to esacpe a Nazi prison camp (the real kind, not the Wolfenstein 3D kind.) Or you would have been a crusader with the determination to wipe out all Christians from the Holy Land. Or you would have been a crewman on a British frigate, determined that Spain should not have hegemony of the seas. What happened to us, such that our best and brightest waste their talents on imaginary worlds instead of the real one?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  19. Re:Am I really the only one here who remembers.. by Hillview · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I really the only one here who remembers Beyond Naked Mages? (sorry double post)

    --
    -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
  20. Fallout 1: Pacifist by Filip22012005 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I finished Fallout 1 without a single kill. Turns out the developers had thought someone wanted to do that. There were experience rewards for sneaking or finding peaceful solutions in almost every quest. It is with that mindset that I started playing Fallout 3. I was disappointed...

    --
    When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    1. Re:Fallout 1: Pacifist by tdelaney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've completed both Fallout 1&2 without my character directly killing anyone. I've also completed both using only unarmed combat. And I think I've managed to complete both by killing every single killable character in the game (hopefully I didn't miss any ...).

      Then again, I have completed both games over 40 times each.

      I haven't completed FO3, and doubt I ever will.

    2. Re:Fallout 1: Pacifist by david_craig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was one of the things that was truly great in the first two Fallout games, the game would allow you to deviate greatly from the path the designers had anticipated and still keep going. They were great for playing the game totally in character. I still remember getting so annoyed by the president of Vault City that I decided to kill her, then ended up having to wipe all the inhabitants and I was still able to complete the game. In Fallout 3 someone in Rivet City kept passing me in the corridor and calling me a thief. After the third time he did this, acting in character, I shot him for his impudence. I could only knock him unconscious, and he kept getting back up regardless as to how many bullets I implanted into his skull. It was at that point for me that I realised that Fallout 3 was not the sequel I was looking for.

  21. Apple II Stock Trader by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A neat trick I used to do with the Apple II was to put two machines side by side on the same power bar, switch both machines on then flipping on the power bar, causing the machines to boot simultaneously. Next, I'd load up a Stock Trading game on both machines and start playing.

    Why do this, you ask?

    Well, the Apple II uses a very simple random number generator that is always the same sequence from the moment the system powers up. So, by booting two machines simultaneously, it put the random number generators on each system in sync with one another.

    In terms of the Stock Trading game, this meant I could use one machine as a sort of crystal ball, allowing me to see into the game's future, and then use the generated results to only buy up stocks that were going to increase in value and sell off those that would decrease.

    As long as the machines booted up simultaneously, this always worked.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Apple II Stock Trader by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somewhere in the bowels of Wall Street they have a similar setup. And they have entrusted our lives and our fortunes on 2 pieces of near obsolete hardware hooked up to a $6 power bar.

      America is now reeling from an economic crisis, auto manufacturers have asked for dole outs, banks have to be bailed out-- are you sure you've never shown this to anyone?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Apple II Stock Trader by NuGeo · · Score: 4, Funny

      How the hell did you get a hold of Goldman Sachs' secret trading algorithm!?

  22. Re:StarCraft with nothing but the most useless uni by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So instead of single-mindedly killing fake people it's better if he single-mindedly killed real people? Perhaps not such a bad change after all, eh?

    --
    Not a sentence!
  23. JC Denton, Interior Decorator by WoodenTable · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Deus Ex, I occasionally rearranged the furniture in rooms for no particular reason. I can only imagine the reactions later: "Oh my god, my ammo and credit chits are all gone! And... someone has swapped my desk chair with the sofa from the break room. And my microscope is now on the corner table..."

    I gave myself bonus points for the one time I did it while a guard was patrolling the room. I wonder if there's some sort of term for this in psychology.

    I also have a riot occasionally setting up Team Fortress 2 engineer-buildings in ridiculous places, such as completely submerged in a lake.

    And don't even get me started on Dwarf Fortress. How long do you want to bet a dwarven settlement, constructed entirely of soap, can survive on a diet consisting solely of horse meat and beer?

  24. Re:Getting around triggers by aecolley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a Starcraft mission where you, playing Terran, get overrun by the Zerg right after you kill off the Protoss. I left one Protoss building standing until I was ready for the Zerg. "Ready" meant that I'd poured all remaining resources into planting siege tanks, bunkers of marines and a few turrets in the area where the Zerg usually attack. I finally knocked over the last Protoss building to win the mission. The story animation -- explaining that Kerrigan was being left at the mercy of the Zerg army -- lasted longer than the Zerg army did. If you didn't do something similar, you haven't played the game properly.

    GTA3 had a cheat to make all pedestrians hate (and attack) you wherever possible. It made playing through the game much more of a challenge. There was another cheat to give the pedestrians weapons (including rocket launchers), which made it a bit too difficult for some missions.

    And in all GTAs, it was possible to do a substantial number of the boring side-missions before the main story. Getting that 100th hidden package in GTA3 involved some tricky flying, but it had to be done. I still regret that there were 4 unique jumps in Vice City that I couldn't get at the start of the game.

    In the Thief games, I liked to stack bodies (of course). I also liked to blackjack every human / kill every monster in an area, and then run around waving my sword for maximum visibility, setting off all the alarms.

    Now I feel like I've shared too much.

  25. Even Toddlers are Doing It! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Funny

    My nephew, age almost 4, had figured out the sequence of commands to start Sim City, enter the security code, and load a city. (he couldn't read, but he had excellent symbol-matching skills)

    He had no strategy, he just bulldozed things until he ran out of money, then started a new game at random. I think he's working on managing Boston's Big Dig project now.

  26. Re:Sometimes... by sopssa · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think everyone does the "go backwards in a race" from time to time.

    I'd really like to see this happen in Formula1.

  27. Amusement Park Tycoon (?) by CyberDong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend's son was a huge fan of building a large park with no exits and some cool attractions. Once the park was filled, and the customers had no way to exit, he would turn a tiger loose in the park. The carnage was fun to watch. Bodies would be flying through the air after being shaken silly by the tiger, people would be screaming.... I was amazed that they'd built such things into the game.

    I believe the title was Amusement Park Tycoon.

  28. I stopped reading the article. by Truekaiser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the author praised halo as a landmark game because it gave the player regenerating health. Thats dumbing down a game not making it better, part of the fun of fps's when i used to play them regularly was trying to stay alive and avoid getting hurt. frankly i wonder when retail mainstream games will reach a point where they dumb them down enough that all you have to do is hit a little button on the menu screen to beat the game..

    What happened to part of the fun of playing the game being the effort and skill needed to play it?

  29. The Hitman Sandbox by SyscRAsH · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Hitman: Blood Money, on the third or fourth map where you had to infiltrate that mobsters house? Well, one day I just decided to do things a little differently. I went up to the clown guy, clubbed him and took his outfit. Then I stuffed him in his car, planning on coming back to him later. No one saw me, so things were cool. Then enacted my nefarious plan. It was a beautiful day in the neighborhood...

    I walked up to the garbage man. He was just going about his business, with no appreciation for the wonderful gift he had in his possession - the garbage truck, a.k.a. Da Macheen. Da Macheen was mine, would be mine, and I had only one thing standing in my way. I clubbed the garbage man, while in full clown suit, because that's how wanton murder in broad daylight is done, and proceeded to feed Da Macheen his first meal of the day. CRRRUUUNCH. So satisfying. But Da Macheen needed more.

    I look across the street, where a woman was tending her lawn. Da Macheen... I wander over, and before long, I had another tribute to Da Macheen. "The Street. Everyone! Feed me EVERYONE!" said Da Macheen. I adjusted my clown nose and position my firey red wig. "It shall be done!" This day, Hell had come to Baker Street...

  30. Re:Boom-badadadada-boom-ba-boom-boom by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never got the rhythm of ball jumping in classic Metroid. I used the NES Advantage, flipped on the Turbo for the B button and then turned the knob until it got to the exact right frequency. I could climb all the way to the top of the screen that way (which is good since there was that energy tank on the ceiling in that one place).

    --
    There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
  31. Unexpected Response by Rob+Alvarado · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just wanted to thank everyone for posting their thoughts and sharing their own in-game antics as we had asked you to on SleeperHit. I'm not exactly surprised that I'm familiar with some of these antics, just much more surprised at how many more the community had created that I'll have to try out now. Again, I didn't expect many people to read either my article or Ron's rebuttal to it but I was still looking forward to hearing some of your thoughts. Rob and Ron look forward to disagreeing with each other in the future and we'd love to hear what you think and what stance you'll take then as well. Whether it's with us at SleeperHit or here if we get slashdotted again. Thanks for contributing. I'll be playing tag or catch with myself in Portal. -Rob

  32. Inverse Freecell by AndyCanfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I play a version of Freecell, with the same rules but a different goal. But you need to turn off autodrop, so you can't play it in Microsoft Freecell. Pysol works well.

    The new goal is to get all the cards in four long streams, king down to whatever, with as few cards as possible in the output stacks. Your score is negative - the best you can do is nothing at all in the output stacks which gives you a score of zero. An Ace counts one, two counts two, three counts three, etc. If the output stack contains an ace and two of every suit that's a twelve; not bad. I can usually get below ten, which is better.

    It requires you to generate long streams of cards and be creative in moving them around. You have to decide the tradeoffs - can you get the stream from here to there or do you have to put an ace in the output stacks, costing you a point? And remmember that if you put the ace and two of spades in the output stack you'll be short a black two when you want to stream up the last red ace, so you'll have to put the red ace on the output stack also and your score will be four, not three.

    It's a challenge; requires a lot more look-ahead than most versions of Solitaire.