Slashdot Mirror


Palm Pre Reports Your Location and Usage To Palm

AceJohnny writes "Joey Hess found that his Palm Pre was ratting on him. It turns out the Pre periodically uploads detailed information about the user to Palm, including the names of installed apps, application usage (and crashes), as well as GPS coordinates. This, of course, is without user consent or control. The only way he found to disable the uploads was to modify system files."

314 comments

  1. Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by masterlogan2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did Palm not think that someone would figure this out? I wonder what kind of backlash there will be about this and how much more negative impact it will have on the Palm brand.

    1. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder what kind of backlash there will be about this

      Answer: Not Enough

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better Answer: It doesn't matter because Palm is a failure anyway.

    3. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      I had a friend just return a Pre that died within a week, I liked the software but advised her to get something a little friendlier. After reading this article she's deciding between an iPhone and a G1. Amazing how these companies do not learn from other failures when people's privacy was invaded. Amazon, I'm lookin' at you.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    4. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by TheCowSaysMooNotBoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Possibly even better answer: 90% of the Palm users don't care.

    5. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Answer: Not Enough

      True. Likely there will be no repercussions whatever. Yet another example of an amoral corporation not giving a shit about their customers. Welcome to the 21st century.

    6. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True. Likely there will be no repercussions whatever. Yet another example of an amoral corporation not giving a shit about their customers. Welcome to the 21st century.

      And that's different from other centuries how?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    7. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      VP of Engineering: "Dude, they're going to find out, and they'll be pissed."
      VP of Marketing: "This is going to be great. Think of all the things we could do with this information. Think of all the people we could sell that information to. The feature stays."

    8. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do with the info anyway? I doubt they're going to send out a suit to every GPS coordinate that was embedded in every crash report. It is not a real time GPS tracking, it's periodic coordinates. My account already has my address, phone number (duh), social security number, and bank/credit/debit account number. So what if Palm's bug squad gets a hex dump of my GPS coordinates when an app crashes? What more can they do with that than what information they already have on me? How can they monetize a GPS coordination any more than an address and phone number?

      Sure I don't want them to have that information, but I'd prefer them to not have any information. Unfortunately, I can't build my own infrastructure, and I'm willing to sacrifice some of that information to get that convenience. Besides which, I have a concealed weapons permit. Thank god for Ted Nugent :-P
      But really, why should I care about a periodic GPS coordinate transmission when they already have access to my home, my phone, and my money? Let's get some perspective.

    9. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      This just confirms to me that Palm Executives are just too dumb to live...

      Sincerely,

      A long-time Palm user (who still uses a Centro)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "story" doesn't touch on this, but I would suspect that there *was* disclosure on some click-through set-up screen, and the user wasn't paying attention.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    11. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      some do. its just hit the lawyer boards.
      http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1062087&mc=1&forum_id=2

    12. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look up "prole drift." More people have opportunities to better themselves than ever before; now *everyone* has a chance to run a shady business and abuse their positions of power. Things like grass lawns and vacations also used to be the exclusive playthings of the wealthy.

    13. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by justdaven · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe, but with the number of folks who tear apart those user agreements, we would have heard of it sooner

    14. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This just confirms to me that Palm Executives are just too dumb to live...

      Sincerely,

      A long-time Palm user (who still uses a Centro)

      Who's the stupid one here, the guy who runs the company that does dumb shit, or the guy who keeps using the products of the company run by the guy who does dumb shit to him?

      Think about it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    15. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Snarf+You · · Score: 1

      its just hit the lawyer boards

      ...hilarity ensues.

    16. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Likely there will be no repercussions whatever.

      Right. You'll whine and whine, but you'll keep right on buying the stuff.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    17. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if my fellow coworkers who chose the Pre over the iPhone were not quite ready to return their devices for full refund and termination of any contract signed at purchase when Palm "hacked" iTunes and Apple promptly "fixed" it cutting all the users off from sync, now they REALLY have a strong case to return it.

      In fact, I just mentioned this article to a co-worker who was showing off his shiny new Pre to me late last week, which after using it for a few days and finding out contrary to what the clerk told him that he could in fact not sync with iTunes, He's clocking out now to return it to the store he bought it from and promised to be headed to Bestbuy to pick up an iPhone 3GS on the way back...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    18. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      "90%"? Polyanna.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    19. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by weszz · · Score: 1

      Wait... you gave Palm your SSN?!?

      Why would a phone maker need that... I understand Sprint would ask because of credit, but Palm?

    20. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What are they going to do with the info anyway?

      Does it matter? They're collecting information that they shouldn't be.

      Would you be OK with a Mac sending Apple a list of all the files your user owns?
      How about Linux sending the kernel developers your MAC and IP addresses (or traceroute)?
      How about Windows sending Microsoft a list of all the search terms you've entered into Google? (via the TCP stack, not IE)

      Since all 3 of these are OS-related, would you care if those got shuffled? (i.e. Windows sending Microsoft a list of all the files your user owns)

      None of these hurt you in any way, yet I wouldn't want any of these situations happening.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    21. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Munk · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points because this is probably exactly how it went down.

    22. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Things like grass lawns and vacations also used to be the exclusive playthings of the elderly.

      Fixed that for you. Now get off my lawn.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    23. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by endianx · · Score: 1

      No, 90% of Palm users won't know. Most would care if they did, though probably not enough to cancel service.

      Good news for me, though. My Verizon contract is up in 5 months and I will be moving to a network with decent phones. I've been really struggling between iPhone, webOS, and Android, but now it is just between Android and iPhone.

    24. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's different from other centuries how?

      In other centuries customers would riot with pitchforks and torches. These days customers just gladly hand over any and all personal information as though nothing bad is happening!

    25. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by isThisNameAvailable · · Score: 1

      Umm, isn't this simply the Palm Profile feature that backs up your device every night OTA? You're asked if you wish to use the service when you first start your phone, and it can be disabled and rescheduled any time you wish.

    26. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > some do. its just hit the lawyer boards.
      > http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1062087&mc=1&forum_id=2

      Err umm, Some of my um CLIENTS need to know if their Palm Pre will record visits to their prostitutes.
      Ahem... please answer this question before 4pm this afternoon, if possible.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    27. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's different from other centuries how?

      In previous centuries, corporations had a more narrow base of customers. Today's world has the internet and a global economy that dwarfs previous centuries' world trade. The 21st century corporation has six billion potential customers, more than enough to care about one or a thousand.

    28. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      VP of Engineering: "Dude, they're going to find out, and they'll be pissed."
      VP of Marketing: "This is going to be great. Think of all the things we could do with this information. Think of all the people we could sell that information to. The feature stays."

      EVP of Marketing: "I eat boogers."
      CMO: "Excellent work, EVP of Marketing. VP of Engineering, you're too cautious. You'll never make it in today's world."
      CIO: "He's right. You're fired."
      VP of Engineering: "It's all good, I already have two other jobs lined up. Later, losers."
      EVP of Marketing: "Did I mention I eat my own boogers?"

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    29. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      But if this happened on a brand new model of mac, would everyone scream about breach of privacy, and that they are going back to good old Microsoft products, or would they just assume that it was a feature needed during beta testing, that someone forgot to remove from the shipping product, which is what this sound like.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    30. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by multisync · · Score: 1

      Wait... you gave Palm your SSN?!?

      Maybe they gave him a chocolate bar in exchange.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    31. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      iPhone and a G1

      If your friend can wait a a little while, there will be a ton of Android options available soon. By the end of the year there should be something like 8 handsets (of 21-22) available on US carriers. Rumor has it that includes a second and/or third on Tmo, two on AT&T and at least one on Verizon.

    32. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Of course, Palm is a bad company that has been making worse and worse products each year

      However, I refuse to use a Windows Mobile product, there are no Android phones sold in my country and the Iphone is both inconvenient and expensive.

      These days, I use my Palm Centro as an Ebook Reader/Phone/Calendar device

      Palm had the pda market cornered and could have easily held on to the smartphone market if they hadn't made such braindead decisions...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    33. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      I have a palm pre and I will probably be giving it back or moving to something else. This was just the icing on the cake.
      The navigation doesn't work half the time, which is one of the main reasons I updated to it.
      There is also a lack of apps. Specifically one where I can store information encrypted. Apparently they had tried to port the app which did this on my previous palm, but a number of users are complaining that they are losing this data.
      I think the palm pre was the right idea but isn't ready for prime time.
      At this time I definitely wish that I had saved myself a couple of hundred bucks and gotten a blackberry or just waited.
      For what I spent I could have installed a navigation system in my car and been better off.

    34. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by icemanx8232 · · Score: 1

      i doubt many people will actually hear about this and so i doubt there will be much backlash

    35. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by rahlquist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And are we sure that none of the other phones do this?

      --
      Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
    36. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, and we expect either them to get slapped on the wrist and told to undo it by the association, told to stop selling the devices by court order and potentially recall all of them, or both the above combined with heavy fines. Either way we also expect Apple to fix the new "fix" upon the very next release...

      As it is, and I spoke to him minutes ago as he was packing up for the day, my friend indicated that iTunes does in fact not currently sync his stuff today. Wether or not he's missing an update that might fix it, he's aware it's a hack, aware there's a fight that will almost certainly end in Apple's favor or at least turn against Palm, and well aware that after 14 days he can't return his device and get out of his contract without penalties or fees, so he's not wasting time at the risk of getting screwwed later.

      he was actually not really too pissed about the hack, he was kind of on Palm's side on that matter and figured Palm would sooner rather than later have a "satisfactory" solution that may or many not involve their own meda player, or outright licensing of Apple's technology. What made him immediately pack up was the news he was being snooped on and that there was not a way to dissable it. He spent about 30 minutes looking to find a way, and made a nasty call to Pre's support line. He removed the battery from his device and was headed home to get the box, manual, and charger on his way to the store...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    37. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by sgt_doom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Did Palm not think that someone would figure this out?"

      Palm...Oh, that's the company that replaced all their American programmers with doods from India.

      Guess not.....

      Recommended sf reading: "Watermind" by M. M. Buckner

    38. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Likely there will be no repercussions whatever.

      Right. You'll whine and whine, but you'll keep right on buying the stuff.

      You are totally right. I should just throw out my cellphone and not get a replacement. That'll show all those cellphone companies. It is not like I need it for my career or anything.

      Seriously, the "if you don't hide in cave and not interact with society, you shouldn't be allowed to complain" argument doesn't fly with me. If not buying a product is not a practical option to push change, the formal regulation is needed.

      On that note, we can see how well the "not buying" strategy works with groups like the RIAA.

    39. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple already does something similar, as does Microsoft. Any communication with them for updates, which are automatic, tell the same thing. As do core and crash dumps. You have looked at these I presume? Ah, thought not.

    40. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, because GPS hasn't been around for other centuries, apart from the last 5 years of the 20th.

    41. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by drunkle+j · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact, I just mentioned this article to a co-worker who was showing off his shiny new Pre to me late last week, which after using it for a few days and finding out contrary to what the clerk told him that he could in fact not sync with iTunes, He's clocking out now to return it to the store he bought it from and promised to be headed to Bestbuy to pick up an iPhone 3GS on the way back...

      So wait.. your coworker was so mad that Palm wouldn't parry Apple's anti-competitive measures and Palm's collection of usage/GPS data, that he rushed out to sign a contract with the company at the center of the warrantless wiretapping debacle? The same company that, in response to hoards of customer complaints, pulled strings in congress to get an unconstitutional ex-post-facto law passed to prevent them from being criminally prosecuted for turning over every bit of customer data they could get their hands on to the feds? Yea, I can see how the average American consumer would make that choice.

    42. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the way that they know realtime where you were and what you just posted to Slashdot. 1984 is not only about tyranny, it is also about how invasive technology can make it.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    43. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use an Android phone. You can compile the source yourself if you want to make sure nothing bad is in it.

    44. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 5, Informative

      hey, AT&T may have complied with illegal orders to provide wire taps, and even played some questionable moves to avoid prosecution, but lets place the blame where it really lies; the Bush Administration... AT&T was not the only company to comply with these orders, and was told quite explicitly, by judges, that the orders were in fact valid...

      AT&T may have broken the law, and violated the privacy of many (suspected crimainals/terorists) Americans, but they did so under a supposed legal authority and under orders to do so, and these wire taps (most of them) were actually for people accused or associated with active federal investigations. Palm is collecting personal information, it has NO association with any criminal activity and no basis in law, and they're doing it without informed concent, and without a way to disable the tracking, and wihtout support or order by the government, and I bet they're doing it without the Phone Company's knowledge too. (and if the phone company IS aware of it, they're FAR more guilty than AT&T is...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    45. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by nxtw · · Score: 1

      But if this happened on a brand new model of mac, would everyone scream about breach of privacy, and that they are going back to good old Microsoft products, or would they just assume that it was a feature needed during beta testing, that someone forgot to remove from the shipping product, which is what this sound like.

      If testing procedures are so poor that this kind of 'feature' remains enabled in the end-user product, who knows what else might be in there?

    46. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that Trickle Down Economics?

    47. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by recharged95 · · Score: 1

      they didn't care.
      Pretty much every major website does it (well not exactly GPS, by IP info pretty much tells you 98%). And don't ask about the telcos.
      Like Apple doesn't (proprietary = unknown hooks)? Google (it's uber data collecting google)? Microsoft (aka evil empire)?
      Right.

    48. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Pre's no different. In fact, the article details exactly that: how the author fixed the source code to prevent the upload to Palm of his information.

    49. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just worried that that freaky Pre chick knows where I live now.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    50. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      You're missing a big one here. Ever think about a Blackberry?

    51. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean, when the rich pee on the poor?

    52. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T may have broken the law, and violated the privacy of many (suspected crimainals/terorists) Americans, but they did so under a supposed legal authority and under orders to do so, and these wire taps (most of them) were actually for people accused or associated with active federal investigations.

      Uhm, what?

      They've been conducting an ongoing DRAGNET of an unauthorized pen register on every subscriber, and turning that over to the feds, illegally. The law on pen registers and wiretaps required judicial oversight. Claiming it was for national security made it subject to FISA.

      So, remove all your references to "(suspected crimainals/terorists) Americans" and just leave it at "Americans". They were tapping people with no relation whatsoever, in an extensive dragnet to try to build databases of acquaintances.

      How'd you like to be added to the no fly list and have your conversations recorded because some friend of a friend of a suspected terrorist accidently called your number?

    53. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, and we expect either them to get slapped on the wrist and told to undo it by the association, told to stop selling the devices by court order and potentially recall all of them, or both the above combined with heavy fines.

      Who is this "we" you speak of, and why would you and yourassociate think something so astonishingly wrong-headed? 1) The violated no law by spoofing the VID. 2) The USB-IF spec accommodates spoofing. That's how a lot of "Microsoft" brand non-Microsoft mice work with USB. 3) Palm is bringing the action to the USB-IF because what Apple is doing is actually more harmful to the spec. The whole point of USB is supposed to be Plug and Play. You plug a device into your computer, the device sends an ID to the OS, and the OS downloads the proper drivers. It's both against the spec and moronic to use the VID as a password to your application (which is essentially what Apple is doing with iTunes), because the ID is open for all the world to see. If Apple wants to keep non-iPods/iPhones from syncing with iTunes, they can put a unique ID in the firmware that's secret, so that any yahoo can't just plug the device into their machine and pull out the password (which again, is what the VID becomes when you use it this way). If everyone followed Apple's lead on this, we'd be left in the bad old days of the 1980's, where every application had its own drivers. 3) Even in the event that the USB-IF does decide they don't like what Palm did, there's no fine, no financial penalty at all. The only adverse effect for violating the USB-IF spec is you can't use the USB logo on your product's box.

    54. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      What are you, retarded?

      Seriously. If you are retarded I will excuse your comment. Otherwise, you need to read 1984 again.

    55. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does it matter? They're collecting information that they shouldn't be." They have been and will always collect information from your other phones too. Thanks to the laws past not too long ago. I'm sure it is perfectly "legal" to do so.

    56. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He commented a line in a shell script, and deleted an executable. Hardly "modifying the source".

    57. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there was, a sleazy one. Basically it says that Palm can monitor the user in various ways, such as: (long list of very innocent and useful features)... It's very easy to read that and think it was an exhaustive list.

      Interestingly Palm says users can opt out... but there is not option on the phone.

    58. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      How's the weather way, way, way, way down under the sand?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    59. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only to find out, after days and days of reading source code, that google was evil after all

    60. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      He's clocking out now to return it to the store he bought it from and promised to be headed to Bestbuy to pick up an iPhone 3GS on the way back

      Sweet. That's sort of like swapping a Sequoia Advantage for a Diebold AccuVote.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    61. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yet another example of an amoral corporation not giving a shit about their customers.

      I disagree. They care about you so much that they want to know where you are all the time. Next step is to turn on the voice recording feature in the middle of the night to make sure you're still breathing.

    62. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Spoofing the ID to make the device work with the OS is one thing, spoofing it to make it work with a 3rd party application, that's a differnt ball game...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    63. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by phoenix321 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your palm is not a chick, never was.

    64. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by psbrogna · · Score: 1

      You gave them access to your house? That seems a little odd. Do you always set out an extra plate at dinner time or do they call ahead/?

    65. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Informative

      And how is this differnt from former MCI's friend and family policy? The simple collection and parsing of information YOU ALREADY HAVE, is not in itself illegal. In fact, pen registers are not subject to 4th amendement protections unless that information is traded or sold, which it was not, accepting that giving it to the NSA was under what AT&T and others considered a legal order to do so.

      A previous court case against MCI did not outlaw their practice, it only prompted MCI to change how they USED that information in their marketing efforts. They never did stop collecting it. In fact, that's why BellSouth had the information to provide the NSA when requested as well.

      The NSA specifically requersted this information from ALL the major carriers. AT&T did NOT provide it voluntarily. Quest was the ONLY ONE to not comply... Do not put this on AT&T, every carrier except quest was guilty. Further, it's ONGOING, except its now under judicial oversight instead of executive oversight.

      On the asside, I was added to the no fly list at one point. A close friend of mine was an active campaigner against a republican running for office, and organized more than one public protest. I was added due to my association with him though associated blog posts on his website. As soon as he got his own name removed, which I understand was not difficult, mine also was removed from the list.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    66. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by element-o.p. · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder what kind of backlash there will be about this and how much more negative impact it will have on the Palm brand.

      Why, none of course...None at all, since Palm knows exactly where you were between noon and 1:00pm today, who you called, where she met you and also knows the phone number of your wife.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    67. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Globe199 · · Score: 1

      Disagree.

      I bet well over 90% of Palm users WOULD care if informed of this. It does not take a geek to understand that this is a serious invasion of privacy. I'd think most people would very clearly understand what is going on here.

    68. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I wonder what kind of backlash there will be about this

      Answer: Not Enough

      Indeed. It's hard enough getting people to care about their privacy to begin with. In a situation like this, where they have no expectation of privacy, it's almost impossible. I'd imagine that for most people - if they even hear about this - the thought process would go somewhat like this: "what? my cell phone reports location and info about my phone back? Oh noes! Oh, wait. I kind of assumed that anyway now that I think about it. Why am I wasting my time reading this?"

    69. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of my um CLIENTS need to know if their Palm Pre will record visits to their prostitutes.

      That's it! That was Palm's motivation all along! To collect one gargantuan database of the most popular prostitutes!

      Whoa to datamine this beauty.... you could find out the most popular prostitutes - and avoid them! Go to unpopular ones and haggle for the price! Find out the REAL unpopular ones for the most kinky stuff!

      Not that I'd be interested, mind you. No sir, not me.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    70. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      Not really. The device can not work without spoofing. That spoofing requires that the OS register that device as a specific type of device. The third party software then treats that device as the type it claims it is. Not different at all. That they have to spoof it to allow compatibility with the third party software is the fault of the third party.

    71. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Slotty · · Score: 1
      I was actually considering purchasing a Palm Pre as my next phone... till now

      who the f**k do they think they are?

    72. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      90% of Palm users don't actually exist.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    73. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Palm wouldn't parry Apple's anti-competitive measures

      Anti-competitive? That word does not mean what you think it does.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    74. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Palm is collecting application and OS crash logs and sending them back presumably for someone on their software QA team to track down and fix bugs. Is this really that much different than Mozilla's feedback agent?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    75. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by ksheff · · Score: 2, Informative

      But if he did want to modify the FOSS software on the Pre, he could just download them from here: http://opensource.palm.com/

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    76. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Granted, the author didn't modify a binary file, but the only way he even knew to do that was because of the low-level access the Pre gives you to the OS, and the fact that it's open. The fix would've been impossible on a locked-down phone.

    77. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Spoofing the ID to make the device work with the OS is one thing, spoofing it to make it work with a 3rd party application, that's a differnt ball game...

      In both cases, it's about applications. Applications use the device drivers provided by the OS. The difference with iTunes is that an extra check is done, so that without the proper VID, iTunes won't hook into the proper drivers.

    78. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Who knows. I for one have added the Palm Pre to the list of gadgets I will not buy or recommend, and i'll be sure to warn all my friends about it.

      I simply cannot condone that despicable behavior by purchasing any products they make from now on.

      And I was seriously considering buying one too. I'm glad I didn't pull the trigger....

    79. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      an abacus can't modify its own state.

    80. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure Palm will be getting some records preservation orders from the FBI soon, and lots of information requests.

      Since it's now known that they get this information sent to them about third parties, the information became discoverable by law enforcement.

      When a third party possesses information about you, law enforcement can compel discovery much more easily than if you possessed it; the standard is lesser than probable cause required for a warrant.

      If they own a palm pre... one national security letter.. gets the whitehouse all the juicy info they could possibly want about their political competition....

    81. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling autoadmit the "lawyer boards" is like calling 4chan the "scholar boards"

    82. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Culture 20! At least someone is awake here!

    83. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

      I'm just worried that that freaky Pre chick knows where I live now.

      Is it bad that I leave my window open at night hoping that she will show up?

      --
      Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    84. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Find my Palm Pre, and will soon be featured in a blog detailing a geek's showdown witha phone thief after tracking him on a Dell notebook. Palm fans will then rejoice in the godliness of the Palm OS.

    85. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary sues?

    86. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choice.

    87. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The only Telco to say no was Qwest. Last time I checked, Palm Pre isn't sold through Qwest. Yes, US Sprint complied.

    88. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Things like grass lawns and vacations also used to be the exclusive playthings of the wealthy.

      And they're still playthings of the wealthy. How many people in the world do you think have grass lawns and vacations?

    89. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 'cause nobody ever managed to jailbreak an iPhone. Or unlock a simlocked Nokia.

      The difference, of course, is that the Pre isn't "locked" in the first place (other than with respect to the carrier, of course). Look at the difference between the procedure for accessing root on the Pre and the iPhone -- and in particular, Apple and Palm's respective reactions to them. Palm actually touted homebrew apps at PreDevCamp. Meanwhile, Apple behaves as if doing any development outside the App Store will result in cell towers crashing and your JesusPhone spontaneously combusting.

    90. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gp didn't ever talk about legality, but only of possibility.

    91. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      When it also includes not just a crash log, but use pattern information, GPS location, and when that data is being catalogged or tracked in any way, it could be an issue. This becomes a bigger issue when the user is 1) non informed,2) it can't be opted out of, and 3) it containes personally identifiable information in violation of federal law.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    92. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Well, here's your problems.
      1) access to 3rd party software though a driver or otherwise has to be licenced or approved. Access to the OS is one thing, that's part of the standard. How an application further uses the data provided by a standards based driver is not the concern of Palm.
      2) the device CAN work without this driver, it simply can;t work NATIVELY with iTunes without this hack. MANY devices sync music from iTunes libraries, they simply access the XML database directly, which Apple fully permits, using their OWN software, or they connect through a licensed plug-in. Palm chose to cheat and avoid writing their own code.
      3) Apple check this USB code for more than "validating the device ID", they not only sync with an app on the device as Palm is attempting to do, but it also MANAGES the device, including firmware updates, software patches, and more; IMPORTS licensed data from the device that were not imported from iTunes directly (introducing the possibility of you loading songs on your Pre from another PC and using iTunes to sync them in to yours); they manage the disk space on iPods that support being used as portable disk devices, including formatting that space; and MUCH more.

      By Palm bypassing Apple's cross check of the device, Apple is subject to the burden of code maintenance to account for how to handle the Pre should iTunes identify it as an iPod, and how to handle errors when the Pre either reports an invalid, non-existant Apple firmware ID, or fails to report one at all.

      All Palm had to do was either 1) pay the licensing fees and work with Apple to build compatabiltiy, or 2) use any number of freely available apps they could have partnered with cheaper that already took full advantage of the iTunes XML database natively. This is simply bad business, and it's going to end badly for Palm. As it is, they've only moved 200,000 devices since launch day, and their market share, even with a HIGHLY advertised shiny new device shrunk this quarter again.

      This may finally break them completely.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    93. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Well, here's your problems. 1) access to 3rd party software though a driver or otherwise has to be licenced or approved. Access to the OS is one thing, that's part of the standard. How an application further uses the data provided by a standards based driver is not the concern of Palm.

      I think you've got it a little mixed up here. Access to hardware doesn't have to be "approved" by an application through a license. Last time I checked, Logitech didn't have to license access to Microsoft Word.

      2) the device CAN work without this driver, it simply can;t work NATIVELY with iTunes without this hack.

      The issue is that there's nothing in iTunes but this VID check that prevents a USB device from working "natively" with iTunes. It's Apple's attempt to convince users that iPods/iPHones are super-duper magical, when in reality, the only reason other players don't work "natively" is because Apple prevents it. (Note: I'm not saying Apple has to allow it, necessarily. All I'm pointing out is that they're using a particularly bad way of excluding other players, and that this exclusion is not based on any real hardware necessity.)

      MANY devices sync music from iTunes libraries, they simply access the XML database directly, which Apple fully permits, using their OWN software, or they connect through a licensed plug-in. Palm chose to cheat and avoid writing their own code.

      The XML library allows programs to see what's in iTunes. It doesn't have anything directly to do with syncing. And Apple is none too pleased that RIM is using their own software to sync with the iTunes library. The issue Apple has with Palm isn't really the use of the VID. It's the use of iTunes in general. Apple would prefer none of its competitors use iTunes. The VID was just a way of limiting the functionality of other players with the application.

      3) Apple check this USB code for more than "validating the device ID", they not only sync with an app on the device as Palm is attempting to do, but it also MANAGES the device, including firmware updates, software patches, and more; IMPORTS licensed data from the device that were not imported from iTunes directly (introducing the possibility of you loading songs on your Pre from another PC and using iTunes to sync them in to yours); they manage the disk space on iPods that support being used as portable disk devices, including formatting that space; and MUCH more.

      By Palm bypassing Apple's cross check of the device, Apple is subject to the burden of code maintenance to account for how to handle the Pre should iTunes identify it as an iPod, and how to handle errors when the Pre either reports an invalid, non-existant Apple firmware ID, or fails to report one at all.

      All Palm had to do was either 1) pay the licensing fees and work with Apple to build compatabiltiy, or 2) use any number of freely available apps they could have partnered with cheaper that already took full advantage of the iTunes XML database natively. This is simply bad business, and it's going to end badly for Palm. As it is, they've only moved 200,000 devices since launch day, and their market share, even with a HIGHLY advertised shiny new device shrunk this quarter again.

      This may finally break them completely.

      This is actually a much more substantial objection, but I still think you're not really understanding how the VID is being used and how the Pre is identifying itself. In Media Sync mode (which is where the Pre uses the Apple VID), the Pre doesn't identify itself as an iPod. It identifies itself, rather, as an Apple product (which currently could be an iPod, an iPhone, or an AppleTV. The way that the Pre identifies itself isn't device-specific, so iTunes can't feed firmware to the Pre. iTunes has no idea what's actually attached to it, specifically. (iTunes could guess what was attached to it, I suppose, a

    94. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Umm, isn't this simply the Palm Profile feature that backs up your device every night OTA? You're asked if you wish to use the service when you first start your phone, and it can be disabled and rescheduled any time you wish.

      That's a good point. A lot of people have taken Palm to task for keeping a list of apps that a customer uses, but with the Pre's backup and restore functionality, I would think that it would be relatively important for Palm to know when the apps crashed, so that the appropriate data can be restored to the phone. Without knowing what crashed when, how do you restore the backup to the appropriate point?

    95. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your palm is not a chick, never was.

      This is Slashdot, remember? For many of us, our palms are indeed a pretty good substitute for a cute chick.

    96. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your carrier (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile....) already knows this information. It's news because now a phone manufacturer is spying on you *as well*.

    97. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      a Logitech mouse doesn't "access" Word at all! The OS responds to the input from the device, the HID driver moves the cursor, and WORD takes input from the OS API for positional input, clicks, and the keyboard stack... These are fundamental aspects of the OS, not of the device, the device simply communicates with the DRIVER.

      In this case, Palm is asking Apple's software to communicate through APPLE'S Driver (not Microsoft's API the driver interfaces with through permission from microsoft on a published API), to their device. This is not an input system, this is not the device sending and receiveing data, but APPLE'S APP being required to do all the work, the device is simply connected, and beyond that, has little interaction with the machine beyond supporting protocols for data xfer.

      Lets look at this scenario, which is basically identical: HP's drivers for their printers don't let just any app interface with their devices (for 3rd party apps to use the printer, they use OS features, like TWAIN, or a spooler, or a print queue), they don't talk directly to the device, they talk to OS level services that talk to the API their driver supports. HP offers software that DOES communicate directly to the device, and can control the printers settings, cause it to scan using native tools (instead of Twain), and can access it's media card readers and such. Now, Cannon comes along, and sells a printer, but does NOT include their own software, and argues that HP, the market leader, and someone who already has software that does this natively with their own devices, bypassing the need for Cannon to write their own API to interface with OS services, should automatically recodnize THEIR device, and their software shold be able to print to it and scan from it, and advertises WITHOUT GETTING HP'S PERMISSION, that HP's licences and proprietary software is compatible with their device...

      What do you think NOW?

      You think telling iTunes it's a Pre by Apple does not cause Apple to have to have code to respond to that invalid response? It's called data validation. Something that responds as an Apple device should be in Apple's own list of supported devices, and iTunes would know what to do with it based on the device ID as well as the VID. If the VID say's "apple", they proceed to thrown more commands at the device, if not, they ignore it. When it replies "apple", and they throw more commands, it expects responses, and failing to get a proper response, iTunes needs to handle it. Why should Apple write this code for free? Honestly, we're lucky it didn't HANG the app!

      On another point, Apple does not PREVENT other devices from working with iTunesd, iTunes is NOT a media player, it;s a DEVICE MANGER, for APPLE DEVICES, that support a LOT more than simply syncing and managing music. There are OTHER media players available, some use the iTunes databse to keep it in sync. Apple DOES have code in iTunes to support plug-ins, and has code to REACT to live modifacations from 3rd party software accessing that data file. Why would Apple write that complex code if they did not expect other peopole to be able to interface in that way? If they wanted people out, the file would either be proprietary, or simply be locked by the driver for exclusive use...

      Excluding 3rd party devices is not because Apple wants them to not use iTunes data, it;s becaus ethey don't want to deal with how to diaply them in iTunes... Remeber, connecting an ipod doesn't just add it as a mapped device in the tree on the left panel, and let you sync, it adds a whole interface that displays when you click on it, has native integration to APIs inside the device's OS, and has lots of settings to control what does and doesn't sync, handing WHAT TO DISPLAY when a non-suppoorted device is connected requires changes to their code, and if that if permitted openly, without partnering with apple, the concequences are outside Apple's support policies, and could cause instability in the app that Apple has to deal with. Blocking unsupported devices protects their code. After all, it's a FREE application...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    98. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      So, why don't you (as in: every single one reading this) do more then? After all you personally, are the responsible for creating this backlash.

      Aaah, but how could you rant that nothing happens, when it would actually happen? And how could you always blame others and never yourself? ;)

      If you now are getting angry, it's because it's true. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    99. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I have no wife... or girlfriend... or blow-up doll... you insensitive clod!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    100. Re:Did it not occur to PALM that this is BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you really looked at the report: The timestamp isn't an actual time and it's uploaded once a day. It's not like they are tracking you live or it tells them every place you've been that day. By the time they get the info your more than likely to be long gone from that actual GPS location which is only logged when it sends the report. Tell me from that report you can identify who that phone belongs to? I don't see any identifiers anywhere on there??? No Serial Number, MSID, MEID or other identifiable numbers that can be linked back to a certain phone let alone you exactly!

      Palm Pre is not the only one:

      http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-spyware-debated-as-app-library-phones-home-1752491/

      http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12686/

      And it is fair to say that the Pre is open enough to allow users to find such things...

  2. Yea, and.... by Bentov · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is anyone surprised? Hell, I thought all phones did this anyway..nothing to see here, move along please.

    1. Re:Yea, and.... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please, can I have my pretty, shiny leash, please? It offers me so much Freedom!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:Yea, and.... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My Motorola i776 is GPS-enabled, but when it was stolen, Boost Mobile said they couldn't use the feature to find my phone. Probably because they get a cut of the hundred bucks it cost me to replace it.

    3. Re:Yea, and.... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Do you think manufacturers can usually track that info about their users?

      That, on the face of it, sounds unlikely.

      I mean, I don't expect HTC to track me when I use my G1 (google on the other hand almost certainly does, but can be easily disabled, by turning off the location tracking)

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Yea, and.... by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it great how the courts can ask Motorola where you are but you can't?

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    5. Re:Yea, and.... by rm999 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Hell, I thought all phones did this anyway"

      Running the GPS on a phone eats up the battery, I wouldn't assume any phone company would be purposefully sabotaging the battery life of its own products to piss off its customers.

      And tracking of cell phones has come up in the past, and is generally quite controversial: http://www.insidetech.com/news/articles/2299-controversial-study-tracks-movement-via-cellphones

      I honestly don't know why Palm thought it could get away with it without some outrage. Especially when it has such a steep hill ahead of it already.

    6. Re:Yea, and.... by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      Maybe because as the GP said, many of us already assume the cell phone companies are tracking us. So, if many have that assumption, what significant backlash could Palm get? Worst case scenario, they can pull a "think of the children" clause or "public safety" line of bull.

    7. Re:Yea, and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't it great how the courts can ask Motorola where you are but you can't?

      You just need to sue yourself and then ask Motorola for the location of your phone so that you can serve legal documents to yourself.

    8. Re:Yea, and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Motorola i776 is GPS-enabled, but when it was stolen, Boost Mobile said they couldn't use the feature to find my phone. Probably because they get a cut of the hundred bucks it cost me to replace it.

      I have an SSH server running on my Pre, and the IP is reported to my dynamic DNS service each time it changes. If it's lost or stolen, I can locate it from anywhere in the world using the GPS. If they turn off GPS, fuck em I can turn it back on. As long as they are on EVDO or have data roaming enabled, I can remote wipe and, in fact, remote brick my phone.

    9. Re:Yea, and.... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      My Motorola i776 is GPS-enabled, but when it was stolen, Boost Mobile said they couldn't use the feature to find my phone.

      Shoulda just called the number and said "Where you at?"

      But seriously, if Boost gave you the location of the phone, they would be liable if you shot or otherwise visited an kind of harm upon the guy who stole it. Er vice versus. I suppose they could give the information to the police, but tracking down a hundred dollar theft is a waste of police resources.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Yea, and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I have no way to verify this, but I'm told by a friend who works for RIM that every button you press on your Blackberry is logged. As an employee, he's very very paranoid about what he uses his for. Friend of a friend story - take it for what its worth.

    11. Re:Yea, and.... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Shoulda just called the number and said "Where you at?"

      Tried it, it didn't work. I would have given the info to the cops; they'll respond to a five dollar shoplifing incident, why shouldn't they respond to my hundred dollar phone? If I stole a new phone from Best Buy you can bet your wife's ass they'd put me in the slammer.

    12. Re:Yea, and.... by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      I would have said that was ridiculous, but after Wells Fargo suing itself, not so much.

    13. Re:Yea, and.... by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Hell, tracking down car thieves caught on camera is a waste of their time apparently. For a while my friend was having problems with cars being broken into and stolen (for a one year period they had 3 car thefts and 2 car break-ins just for people in their house, the next door neighbors had problems, too) so he installed a camera with 8 hours of record time and his car got stolen again. When he told the reporting officer he had them recorded in the act, he didn't even want to see it. The quality wasn't great, but he didn't know that, because he refused to even look at it. WTF is wrong here?

    14. Re:Yea, and.... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      they'll respond to a five dollar shoplifing incident, why shouldn't they respond to my hundred dollar phone

      The shoplifter is present and detained in the store, and the shopkeeper witnessed the theft with his own eyes. There's no hour-long triangulation process wherein you figure out the 100 yard radius where the phone is, and then demand that every person in the area submit to search, or maybe the guy is in his own house, and some GPS coordinates aren't probable cause for entry...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    15. Re:Yea, and.... by juanfe · · Score: 1

      (used to work for Nextel, know their location infrastructure well).
      I suspect that the basic reason for this is that customer care doesn't have the tools to do it.
      The network infrastructure is there, and the tools are there, but Sprint probably hasn't invested in giving this kind of capability to care organizations. Plus, there ARE some (minor, overblown, redherring but real) concerns there about impersonation, spoofing and such, particularly in Boost land where the amount of information known about customers is pretty minimal to begin with.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    16. Re:Yea, and.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Probably pedantic, but Motorola wouldn't know. It would be strictly the carriers.

    17. Re:Yea, and.... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I had a set of home built speakers stolen from my car back in 1978, the police were very diligent in getting them back. That's their job, and with the triangulation it's the judges job to issue a warrant.

    18. Re:Yea, and.... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      "Hell, I thought all phones did this anyway"

      Running the GPS on a phone eats up the battery

      If you already have the almanac, it will only take ~3 seconds to get a GPS position. I used to do it all the time at work, and that was a cornerstone of the business.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    19. Re:Yea, and.... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Running the GPS on a phone eats up the battery, I wouldn't assume any phone company would be purposefully sabotaging the battery life of its own products to piss off its customers.

      You may already realize this, but for clarity's sake: GPS isn't needed to track phones. They can be tracked simply from their signal as long as there are multiple towers within range to receive it. So probably in any city you can be tracked.

      And tracking of cell phones has come up in the past, and is generally quite controversial: http://www.insidetech.com/news/articles/2299-controversial-study-tracks-movement-via-cellphones

      It may be controversial when some scientists announce that they're going to be using tracking data. That doesn't mean you aren't quietly being tracked anyway. Hell, carriers are required to give your position to law enforcement or emergency services. Since this kind of tracking is more or less passive -- it's based on your normal cell signal, no extra data is being sent by your phone -- then unlike with the Palm Pre's GPS you have no direct way of knowing if you're being tracked or not. You just know it's possible.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:Yea, and.... by lexbaby · · Score: 1

      Running the GPS on a phone eats up the battery, I wouldn't assume any phone company would be purposefully sabotaging the battery life of its own products to piss off its customers.

      Some observations from a Pre owner. The GPS is on all the time by default (one reason for the Pre's reported poor battery life). When the GPS is off, it still can get a general idea where you are (this based on the fact when you open the Google Maps application it knows what city I'm in with a large circle indicating the "margin of error"). Turning the GPS off improves battery life significantly, so I deduce that the GPS receiver is really off.

      --
      lexbaby
      "Be Brave, Be Loyal, Be True." -- Hawkeye Pierce
    21. Re:Yea, and.... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      You may already realize this, but for clarity's sake: GPS isn't needed to track phones. They can be tracked simply from their signal as long as there are multiple towers within range to receive it.

      With with only one tower in range you can (of course) be located as being in its service area and which "pie wedge" you're in. If it exports the distance from the timing handshake (and you're not in a signal shadow and communicating using a reflection) that can be narrowed to an arc around it.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    22. Re:Yea, and.... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      With with only one tower in range you can (of course) be located as being in its service area and which "pie wedge" you're in. If it exports the distance from the timing handshake (and you're not in a signal shadow and communicating using a reflection) that can be narrowed to an arc around it.

      Interesting. How does it figure direction from only one tower... *remembers what cell towers look like* *lightbulb goes on* duh from which of the antennae receives the signal.

      So yeah they can narrow down your location to an extent with just one tower. Also means they can do a much better job of determining your location with just two towers.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    23. Re:Yea, and.... by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are dismantling our society, in case you didn't notice. Honest police work is punished when directed at lower and lowest-class OR upper and top-class people while nickel-and-diming of middle class is encouraged.

      It's proles and untouchables vs. we the people.

    24. Re:Yea, and.... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the two towers measure and report your distance (using turnaround time adjustments to your cellphone to fit it into the Rx time slot) they can put you on one of two points - one of which can be eliminated by antenna pattern.

      If the two towers can't accurately measure your distance but CAN agree on timing for measuring the moment of their reception of your signal, they can put you on a constant-distance-difference hyperbola between them, ala classic LORAN.

      I think the ones typically deployed these days can do both, putting you on a fuzzy dot on a hyperbola using only two towers.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    25. Re:Yea, and.... by x102output · · Score: 1

      yup. In fact tracking info is needed to tweak tower hand-off handling algorithms and such and all sorts of other QoS data.

    26. Re:Yea, and.... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I had a set of home built speakers stolen from my car back in 1978, the police were very diligent in getting them back. That's their job, and with the triangulation it's the judges job to issue a warrant.

      But, that was 1978. A lot has changed. Cops back then weren't getting successfully sued any time they sneezed wrong, and most local cops had a decent relationship with the individual people of the community and really cared. They also had a lower workload that allowed them time to investigate crimes that *didn't* make TV News.

      If the "me" of 1978 were to be transported to now, I'd likely think I was in another country. I'd be right, too. This isn't the country it used to be, although sadly I'd probably be familiar with the behavior of our current President, as he seems to be going for "Jimmy Carter, Part Deux" in regards to foreign policy (and energy policy to a certain extent). He seems to be channeling his "inner Hillary" when it comes to Healthcare though.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    27. Re:Yea, and.... by WiseWeasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I wonder if you could sue a John Doe for stealing your phone, and then subpoena the current GPS info from the carrier in order to prosecute...

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    28. Re:Yea, and.... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the Pre's location service thinks I'm in the middle of Dallas, TX. The trouble is, that's several hundred miles away. WTF is the deal with that?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    29. Re:Yea, and.... by wronskyMan · · Score: 1

      You'd probably need a police report and therefore risk criminal charges for filing a false one.

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    30. Re:Yea, and.... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If the "me" of 1978 were to be transported to now, I'd likely think I was in another country. I'd be right, too

      You got THAT right. Back then, women would casually ask "wanna fuck?" (sadly I was married). Now days when a woman walks up and says that, she wants money for crack or whiskey. At age 26 I never got carded; now I have a white goatee and and I always do.

      I never thought I'd see a worse president than Carter, but Bush way outdid him in his failness.

    31. Re:Yea, and.... by beerdini · · Score: 1

      I've been reading this story and posts since this morning and I'm more surprised about the outrage it generated than the fact that they were gathering this information. Like many other posters said, I thought cell companies were doing this anyway. I'm not going to get rid of my Pre or change my habits because of it. What you were saying about the GPS settings, I have mine turned off by default. I figured that it would be a drain on the battery for being on all of the time, and I wanted to know what apps were GPS dependent. I have noticed several times with Google Maps that if I hop around using it, the first map to appear has been the location of the last time that I used the application. It also takes a minute for it to update with my current location and sometimes the map is off. I was using it for driving directions last weekend more so for an accuracy test of the map, and it had me running in parallel of the highway that I was on, in what would be the equivalent of driving through a field. The directions were still accurate. Because I don't feel like making another post, I'll just go on to ask who says that GPS location sometimes won't determine why an app crashes? Maybe the "last known location" put it on the path to a known dead zone, so instead of an engineer having to read through code they can determine that the crash was because of location. The engineer won't have to waste time trying to fix that error, they can work on one that they can actually fix.

  3. the fine print by alain94040 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see if you can find the trick in Palm's privacy policy:

    Personal information is information directly identifiable to you, such as your name, address, email address, and phone number, as well as other non-public information associated with such information. Some examples of how we collect and use personal information include ... [ a list that sounds pretty safe and reasonable]

    The operating word is Some examples: legally, they don't say that the list is exhaustive and that they don't collect information any other way. So the long list of nice looking collection is just a decoy!

    --
    FairSoftware.net -- iPhone dev jobs for geeks by geeks

  4. Boycott by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, add them to the list.
    Actually it's getting hard to keep track. Should we start a wiki?

    1. Re:Boycott by Ogive17 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would be easier to keep track of the companies that have NOT screwed over the customer.

      I'll get back to you if I can think of one.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:Boycott by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Nah, we can just keep a list of those who don't do something to invade privacy or fuck us over on one of our other rights.

    3. Re:Boycott by StreetStealth · · Score: 3, Funny

      My local, family-owned grocery store has never screwed me over!

      Oh wait, they did stop carrying that one delicious brand of pita bread. And the express lane is always too busy. And there's that ugly, no-name DVD rental kiosk in the entryway with MS Paint graphics.

      Never mind, they suck.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    4. Re:Boycott by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, there's the Duesenberg corporation... Oh wait, you meant companies still in operation?

      Never mind.

    5. Re:Boycott by keithjr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seems like the only phone you'd be able to buy with this requirement would be an OpenMoko device. Maybe an Android phone if it's mostly open source.

      Closed source and closed hardware devices mean these little surprises will continue to happen.

    6. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local, family-owned grocery store has never screwed me over!

      Well my local, family-owned grocery store only screws over people who don't use their "Super Saver" friendly discount card. ...Oh, wait...

    7. Re:Boycott by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      This is actually an interesting idea. I would be very curious to see a wiki that comprehensively listed the ways that they have been poor corporate citizens. I don't expect many companies to be innocent, but it would be nice to know who is least guilty when I'm considering a purchase.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    8. Re:Boycott by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Boycott by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Funny

      > I'll get back to you if I can think of one.

      Microsoft reduced my TCO and enhanced my usability. Aero makes computing fun. And they pay me to shill for them.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Boycott by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I think at this point, we should start a white list instead of a black list.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    11. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gphone, Iphone, Palm, Yahoo, Bing, your browser (most all of them) even when you don't use a search engine, ads on website, websites themselves, web servers, your OS, your car has a chip in it as well, the power and water companies are watching your usage for signs of any agriculture activities in your home. The government wants to allow cookies.

      The boycott is a good idea, there's too much data mining and it's creep and no one's damn business.

      Meet you in the cave after the hunt. By the way, our constantly leaving the cave and heading east is starting to create a trail, go west for while...

      I'm all for the boycott, but it's going to be a lot of work.

    12. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my list:

      (1)
      (2)
      (3)
      (4)
      (5)

    13. Re:Boycott by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1

      It would be easier to keep track of the companies that have NOT screwed over the customer.

      Here is the list. Feel free to add to it...

    14. Re:Boycott by auric_dude · · Score: 1

      Why start a wiki when you might get EFF to extend their http://www.tosback.org/about.php http://www.tosback.org/timeline.php service?

    15. Re:Boycott by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I thought we were boycotting wikis.

    16. Re:Boycott by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 1

      My favorite example is Red Hat, although I'm sure some people here are fully prepared to bash them.

      --
      ~ C.
    17. Re:Boycott by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      MS Paint graphics.

      My God, your grocer is worse than Hitler.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:Boycott by velen · · Score: 1

      The Android based mobiles I have seen are still tied to a particular vendor. What the fuck is the use of an open platform when it tied to a !@!#@! service provider that sucks?

    19. Re:Boycott by thexile · · Score: 1

      Godwin!!!

  5. Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, it is probably not the best idea to upload crash information without user consent, but seriously folks, it's crash data. It's a way for Palm to find bugs in the field that would have been undiscovered in the testing labs.

    Google does this all the time. Oh sure, it happens on the server where you can't see it, but the bugs occur and they need some way to log them.

    1. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, because GPS coordinates are really relevant to crash data...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would depend on the programs running at the time, wouldn't it? After all, some do use the GPS coordinates, so it is reasonable that some have a bug in how they do so...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a crash dump contains your CC, SSN and all of your passwords AND you have to pay your cellular provider to transfer data you don't want to send or have third parties receive.. I think there are no shortage of legitimate reason(s) to be pissed and never do business with such a company again.

      At least Microsoft *ASKS* permission send bug reports.

    4. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by grub · · Score: 1


      Maybe if the crash happened while the user was in the Bermuda Triangle?

      .

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      So...I show that you were in a T-Mobile store when your Pre crashed, how interesting...

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    6. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by maxume · · Score: 1

      They aren't particularly more interesting than what tower your phone last connected with, and it takes some doing to be surprised that the phone company would have the latter, so it strikes me as tone deaf that they would bother having the coordinates sent home (I suppose it might be handy when recovering stolen phones, but that sounds like more resources than would typically be invested in recovering a stolen phone).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, GPS coordinates are relevant. This is because they can be used to determine which towers are being used by the device in order to debug issues that involve the cellular towers.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    8. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Nazlfrag · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not just crash data. It sends that too, but it also uploads your GPS coordinates daily along with the app use data (what you've used and for how long) according to TFA. It's customer profiling, not bug testing.

    9. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably more to verify that the GPS system is returning valid-ish data. If it starts spitting out 0' 0' (for example), there may be a bug which needs to be attended to.

    10. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by digsbo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong. The cell id (tower identifier) is available from the GSM module without knowing the GPS coordinates. In fact, with multiple local towers, you might incorrectly guess which tower is being used based on lat/lon, since they may handover (pass your call from one tower to another) for a variety of reasons, including capacity.

    11. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because GPS coordinates are really relevant to crash data...

      Sure. This is a mobile unit, so if there is a locus of crashes at a particular location, that might indicate that the problem is with the link to the local access point. It's perfectly reasonable that this is data that they'd want for debugging. (And they'd also like to get the same information from systems that don't crash, so they can say "well, other Palms have accessed from that spot with no problem, so it's not the local node).

      Just because they want (or think that perhaps sometime in the future they might want) this information, though, doesn't mean that they should get it without permission. This is personal information; they shouldn't be collecting it without asking.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    12. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      When I turned on my Samsung Omnia for the first time, Windows Mobile OS *asked* me if I wanted to send crash data or not. I declined, but appreciated that they're civil enough to ask up-front.

    13. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by trapnest · · Score: 1

      The Palm Pre is only on Sprint (so far), so the radio is CDMA, not GSM. Your point is still valid though.

    14. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Otto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google did this specifically in Google Maps Mobile well before they rolled out the "find my location" support in it.

      In early Google Maps Mobile versions, if you had GPS support, it would include the GPS coordinates and the "visible" cell tower IDs and strengths in every request back to Google. They used this data to improve their location service (by getting GPS data on where the cell towers were) before rolling it out to the public. That's how they got the location service to work even on phones without GPS data, it uses the cell tower signal strengths to guess at where you are.

      The data is still sent by Google Maps Mobile on any phone that supports it.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    15. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I've written code to collect data for bug reports. Basically anything I could find I chucked in. This was a while back and it was an POS system which didn't know very much if anything about the user, but I can quite imagine someone including taking a back trace and adding as much information as they could find without thinking about privacy.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    16. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically anything I could find I chucked in. This was a while back and it was an POS system

      Well, if you had been a bit more selective about the what you put in it, maybe it wouldn't have been such a piece of shit system.

      I kid, I kid!

    17. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cell id (tower identifier) is available from the GSM module without knowing the GPS coordinates.

      Except the Pre is on Sprint - which is CDMA, not GSM

    18. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Then report the program that caused it and turn the information to who ever created the program.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I had to giggle a few months ago reading a headline in NZ Computerworld: "HP Launches into POS"

    20. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by thenextstevejobs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, maybe when you're using the bloody map

      --
      Long live the BSD license
    21. Re:Oh no! Automated Dr. Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bug status: Cannot reproduce (unknown GPS coordinates at time of crash)

  6. Obligatory by Xserv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All your phone are belong to us.

    No?

    #fail

    --
    "I love lamp."
  7. Oh Noes! by AtomicDevice · · Score: 1

    I'm totally never buying a palm because of this.

    Wait.

    maybe it's because their stuff sucks and is super behind the times.

    It took them how long to put wifi in one their devices? Treos have practically never had wifi, what is up with that?

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
    1. Re:Oh Noes! by Lord_Byron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your comment is super behind the times. The Pre is a slick little device, and easily stands with other moderm smartphones.

      Including in the "violate user's privacy" space, it seems.

    2. Re:Oh Noes! by drhamad · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Blackberry's don't have wifi either, do they?

      --
      -Daniel
    3. Re:Oh Noes! by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Some do, some don't. I don't believe that any of them on Verizon or Sprint do, but some of AT&T's and T-Mobiles do.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    4. Re:Oh Noes! by Oloryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Treos have practically never had wifi, what is up with that?

      Probably that the cell companies would rather that you access the internet from your cell phone via their expensive cellular data plans than be able to get around that by using a nearby WiFi access point.

    5. Re:Oh Noes! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Not always. In heavily-congested areas, the WiFi capabilities offload capacity requirements from the towers. We had a Verizon rep out not long ago who mentioned that after a recent moderate quake in SoCal (magnitude 5.5 in Chino Hills), voice demand shot up to 150% of capacity, and data demand reached almost to capacity. The more of that which goes somewhere other than the towers in the first place, the better off the network will be in an emergency.

      (Frankly, the idea that a cell network would freeze up on a quake like that kind of frightens me. When something serious hits -- somewhere in the range of 6.7 or above -- no one will be able to talk to anyone.)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:Oh Noes! by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

      Treos never had wifi because old PalmOS didn't support it. The one Treo palm made with wifi only ran Windows Mobile.

    7. Re:Oh Noes! by wbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      PalmOS 5 had/has full support for WiFi. They even have released a WiFi card that can plug into the SD slot of many Palm OS 5 devices. I have personally used a Tungsten T3 with the WiFi card for a number of years and it works quite well, especially for doing stuff over SSH or quickly checking email.

      There were also a couple of PalmOS 5 devices that had built-in WiFi notably the Tungsten TX and the LifeDrive.

    8. Re:Oh Noes! by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      Kind of like when a couple of planes crash into buildings.

    9. Re:Oh Noes! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Sure we can. Those of us who live in earthquake zones and are interested in being prepared for "a big one" have obtained ham radio licenses.

      Hell, there are handhelds that do voice and data AND cost less than a good smartphone. No plan required!

    10. Re:Oh Noes! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      and despite the Treo community putting a bounty on hacking it to work, it didn't work with Treos.

  8. User Consent ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Informative

    Story says...

    This, of course, is without user consent or control.

    But From Palm Infocenter, they say

    Palm's own "Terms and Conditions" statement, along with their Privacy policy, detail that Palm basically maintains it has the right to indefinitely collect, process, store and share this information. Users must accept this multipage collection of fine-print waivers and disclaimers in full during the initial device setup process before being able to utilize the device.

    1. Re:User Consent ... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Users must accept this multipage collection of fine-print waivers and disclaimers in full during the initial device setup process before being able to utilize the device.

      It was in the basement!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:User Consent ... by jandersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... has the right to indefinitely collect, process, store and share this information

      Except that this is not legal in a number of countries; can we assume that they only collect info where it is legal to do so?

    3. Re:User Consent ... by Oloryn · · Score: 1

      Behind a door with a sign saying "Beware of the Tiger"?

    4. Re:User Consent ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it WAS there!

    5. Re:User Consent ... by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      So if you hide it from the users, that makes it OK, legally.

      Which is sickening.

      --

      Question everything

    6. Re:User Consent ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop writing utilize when you mean use.

  9. Uncool by sweatyboatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read the privacy policy and it doesn't really seem like it's built to cover this kind of snooping.

    And then there's this:

    You may choose whether or not to provide your personal information to us. If you choose not to do so, you can continue to interact with Palm, but you may not be able to take advantage of certain products, services, offers, or options that depend on personal information.

    So is there a website or a setting on the Pre to disable this thing. TFA seems to say there isn't.

    I mean, there's utility in understanding how people are using your device. But not letting your users know you're uploading daily usage stats and not giving them a way to turn it off?

    Truly Uncool.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
    1. Re:Uncool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have any of you not read their Privacy Policy on their website????

      Here is a subsection of "Collection and Use"
      "Location Based Services. When you use location based services, we will collect, transmit, maintain, process, and use your location and usage data (including both real time geographic information and information that can be used to approximate location) in order to provide location based and related services, and to enhance your device experience."

      Nothing tricky here... if you people, who are interested in privacy, are upset about this as you say you are, why didn't you take the time to read their privacy policy before buying it? It's really your own fault for not reading the policy and if you think about it, how is this different from other privacy sharing services such as Loopt, Facebook, Twitter, Get-tagging cameras, OnStar..... I'm not a fan of those but it seems the general population either does not care or is not educated about it (not my fault that people are more interested in what Britney Spears ate than the fact that their privacy rights are being eroded)...

      You reap what you sow...

  10. Survey Says.... by swanzilla · · Score: 0

    ...Palm is still obsolete as my old PDA from 1999. Boo.

  11. EVERY cellular phone tracks you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    even if it doesn't send any data, just by being in contact with some base station tower every few minutes. That tracking info IS used in civil and LE investigations regularly. And as Hans Reiser found, removing your phone battery to stop the tracking is considered incriminating evidence in its own right.

    1. Re:EVERY cellular phone tracks you by tengwar · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that's not the case. A GSM phone will only call in every few hours; when it is switched on or off; when it needs to call out or send an SMS; when it is asked to call in; or when or when it moves between areas covered by different MSC/VLRs. An MSC/VLR covers a large area of a country with thousands of base stations. The bit about "asked to call in" is interesting. The network knows that the handset is in the area covered by an MSC/VLR, but not where, so it broadcasts a request for contact over the base stations in the area. The handset responds, localising itself to a base station. The point is to minimise signally costs and battery power consumption.

      Yes, you can use the information about the last localisation in legal investigations, because the network keeps track of where and when you were last seen. It's also possible to send a silent SMS to get the phone to localise. However there is no continuous tracking of handsets by default.

  12. Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by Duradin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Oh, I see, this isn't about an Apple product. Carry on then.

    1. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by lancejjj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb?

      I only get paid to attack particular businesses and politicians.

      I'm sure the hell not going to bother to attack someone else for free. Someone has to pay for it.

    2. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Er, I think you just supplied it...

    3. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where are the fanboys defending this stupidity? Oh, wait, it isn't an Apple product.

    4. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but wait, it pretends to be...so where are they?

    5. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      You're it.

    6. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by escay · · Score: 1

      are you saying Apple products are incapable of such stupidity? you sound like a fanboy to me...

    7. Re:Where's the hyperbolic and inflammatory blurb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palm lost their fanboys long ago...

  13. Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL NO! by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, I can see sending what applications are installed and what crashes have occurred given the user's explicit permission - I allow my Ubuntu boxes to participate in the "popularity contest" wherein what apps I install are (anonymously) logged, and I will frequently send crash reports to help get the cause of the crash fixed.

    In both of those cases *I* decide if it happens, and I was informed of the data being uploaded.

    But automatically reporting my GPS locations - HELL NO!!!

    Yes, the Pre is a phone - as such it MUST, BY LAW be able to report its location to 911 (here in the US, natch). My phone (which is NOT a Pre) has been configured to turn GPS off for anything OTHER than E911. If I found out that it was NOT abiding by that selection - that it was sending position data to anyone other than E911 - then not only would I be terminating my cell contract, I would be filing suit against the makers of the phone AND the cell carrier.

    Again, I can see why Palm would want apps installed and crash data - but WHAT DAMN BUSINESS is it of theirs to know position?!?!

  14. Won't they ever learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, that total control of their users and the things they can and can't do. Apple should not control their users like that, it's just...

    Oh wait, you mean someone else than Apple is doing that?

    Damn you Microsoft, always controlling your users....

    Oh wait, you mean it's neither Apple or Microsoft?

    So, you zealots who always bash on Apple and Microsoft... what FUD will you say to protect your precious Palm now? And wasn't Google's Android doing something similar too?

    The solution is easy: get a cellphone that's JUST A GODAMN PHONE.

    1. Re:Won't they ever learn? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I have a limited number of pockets. I don't want to carry a calendar, a notepad, a camera, a watch, a movie player and a laptop for email with me everywhere I go.

  15. Devils advocate by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They may be if the crash is in a location based application...

    Just sayin'. We need more detail on what the crash logs were from.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. Slashdot Exercise Time! by db32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the spirit of blaming Apple for Palm's misbehavior with their iTunes stunt please respond here with how this is also Apples fault.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its amazing how resentful Apple fanbois become when they are brought to task for the M$ like anti-competitive behavior from their own beloved.

    2. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by Xserv · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the spirit of blaming Apple for Palm's misbehavior with their iTunes stunt please respond here with how this is also Apples fault.

      I'll give it a shot: There's an app for that!"

      I digress.

      - xserv

      --
      "I love lamp."
    3. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? What does this iDigress app do?!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Ah, the resident Apple fanboys. Always so defensive. Clearly this story has nothing to do with Apple, and nobody has suggested that it does.

      Now I'm pretty well distanced from the Palm-iTunes shenanigans, not owning any portable music player nor running an OS that iTunes supports. I think there's a pretty narrow range of belief systems that could lead to the conclusion that Palm's behavior is worse than Apple's in that case. First, if you believe that vertical monopolies are generally a good thing, and that protection of them is in everyone's interest. And, second, if you believe that Apple is good no matter what they do. Although I certainly recognize that Apple was within their rights legally, Palm's actions made both their device and Apple's software more useful and Apple's made both less useful. If you think Apple's behavior is better hand in your geek card.

    5. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by weszz · · Score: 1

      Hm... great idea... probably already taken though... an app that whenever you need someone to blame, it tells you who to blame...

      probably would be blocked from the app store if Apple was one of the possible "to blames".

    6. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Wow. Apple fanboy much?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      "Apple set the example, and emboldened Palm to do it"?

      Seems reasonable that if Apple had a strict practice of respecting their users' rights, perhaps Palm may as well?

      Just thought I'd try and oblige you.

    8. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      It XServe stuff?

    9. Re:Slashdot Exercise Time! by db32 · · Score: 1

      My point is they suggested that it was Apple's fault that Palm had their device do goofball shit to work with iTunes and it was ultimately fixed. So when it is a bug (and every bug is a potential security problem) that lets you abuse things its A-OK, but when it is a bug that lets someone else abuse you it isn't ok? I think that is patently insane and is strictly related to the anti-Apple emotional baggage that people carry around here.

      Now...from the economic perspective, I absolutely believe that a monopoly gained and maintained through competition is fine. Illegal use of monopoly powers (see MS) is not. Apple uses iTunes to sell iThings...why in the hell would they allow someone else to use iTunes to sell their own hardware instead of an iThing? Apple is not a software company. Palm was trying to take advantage of Apples success to fuel their own. Now...if you REALLY want to talk about competition and whatnot then Palm should be building their own iTunes competitor. That would make them better. However, even in your case here about Apple being too big, Palm was helping them keep that position by supporting iTunes, so in fact they are NOT doing the better thing as you claim by your own logic that Apple is doing the bad thing. Now finally...Apple is not a monopoly and to insist they are is a failure of economic thinking. Coke is not a monopoly because they are the only ones who sell Coca Cola. Ford is not a monopoly because they are the only ones that sell Ford vehicles. Apple is not a monopoly because they sell devices that work with their own software. The barrier that Apple puts up in terms of their software is trivial to get around, it isn't a lock in, they just make it a pain in the ass to work outside of their products. Being successful is not the same thing as a monopoly by any stretch. It seems to me that Palm has been in the handheld market much longer than Apple...why should we be giving them a free pass and handouts for obviously missing the boat?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  17. Dear Palm by Tikkun · · Score: 1

    Although I am not your customer, were I your customer, I would gladly be a beta tester and give you all sorts of useful information (automated or otherwise) about how I used your products.

    This being said, I would hope that you would have the courtesy of asking me to opt-in, rather than assuming that you own my usage habits.

  18. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

    I am not sure I would want them knowing what apps I have installed either. Why do they need to know? If it is a 3rd party application and it crashes have a filed stored on the phone so the crash handling application knows where to send the dump file or whatever. Palm does not need to know that my google maps application crashed, google needs to know. So send the error report directly to google.

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  19. Give the people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd use this as an opportunity to learn of an existing bug which both crashes the Pre and is easy to reproduce. From there, it's more of a field trip.

    CRASH REPORT -- Hardware store
    CRASH REPORT -- Army/Navy Supply store
    CRASH REPORT -- Tree outside Megan Fox's bedroom window
    CRASH REPORT -- Megan Fox's bedroom
    CRASH REPORT -- County fair
    CRASH REPORT -- Quarry
    CRASH REPORT -- Petting zoo (after hours)

  20. Settings to disable by Late+Adopter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The initial setup asks you how want to use your location information, and the "Location Services" app lets you change this at any time. I'm looking at the options under that app now, all of which can be switched off:
    • Auto Locate: Your location will be automatically provided to applications that request it.
    • Use GPS: Improves accuracy but can impact battery life
    • Geotag Photos: Stores the GPS coordinates of your location when you use the camera
    • Background Data Collection: Allows Google to automatically collect anonymouse location data to improve the quality of location services.
    1. Re:Settings to disable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That setting obviously has nothing to do with what everyone is complaining about, unless Palm recently bought Google or vice versa....

    2. Re:Settings to disable by Emrys · · Score: 1

      And for what it's worth, my settings since I bought the phone have been:

      Auto Locate: Off. You will be asked for authorization when an application requests your location.
      (I get prompted each time I start any app that wants my location. I can say no, and it starts with "limited functionality", like requiring me to type in a zip code for movie searches manually.)

      Use GPS: Off
      (I turn it on when I need to use it. Privacy and battery life concerns. Due to the latter, I know it's off when I turn it off.)

      Background Data Collection: Off
      (Based on someone else's post, I would guess this is Google using GPS coordinates and cell tower info to figure out where the cell towers are so they can provide location services without GPS active.)

      I don' t have a Geotag Photos option.

      Checking the current /var/context/contextfile, the first line is "{ "Location": false }". Every other line in there is an app start/stop time.

      That doesn't mean it doesn't start up the GPS when it crashes to find coordinates to report, or anything... but I'd be curious what Joey's settings were here.

    3. Re:Settings to disable by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      I don' t have a Geotag Photos option.

      It's only available if Auto Locate is turned on.

    4. Re:Settings to disable by joey · · Score: 4, Informative

      So FWIW, I have "Background Data Collection" set to off, that did not stop the Pre sending those logs to Palm. I'm sure that that switch does prevent sending your location info to the Google, which makes it doubly unsettling that it's still sent to Palm, no?

      --
      see shy jo
    5. Re:Settings to disable by midnitewolf · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty important point... Might be worth modding parent up, and if you're Joey Hess, might be worth including in the blog post linked to in the /. article.

  21. Re:1984 by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmmm, lets see how accurate 1984 is in this case:

    An ultra-facist, ultra controlling government that...

    1) Watches, analyzes, and controls your every move to identify possible revolutionaries.
    2) Controls all commerce and businesses
    3) Outlaws sex for pleasure (even with your spouse)
    4) Convinces children to rat on their own parents.
    5) Uses constant warefare, drugs, and pornography to subdue the masses
    6) Re-writes history to suit its present needs
    7) Tortures and/or kills anyone who resists it
    8) Encourages (forces?) racism and nationalism to the point of incoherent rage in every citizen.

    versus a private company that...

    1) Retrieves information when your phone software crashes

    Sorry, I'm just not seeing it.

  22. Re:1984 by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    Or you could see them as self-fulfilling. Who's to say that they would even have thought of such things without the fiction giving them the idea?

  23. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but WHAT DAMN BUSINESS is it of theirs to know position?!?!

    To see if the issue is related to the towers you are connecting to.

  24. TFA Text by AceJohnny · · Score: 5, Informative

    Woops, looks like /. is hammering the server. Here's a copy of the text (as of now):

    I've been taking a closer look at the WebOS side of my Palm Pre tonight, and I noticed that it periodically uploads information to Palm, Inc.

    The first thing sent is intended to be my GPS location. It's the same location I get if I open the map app on the Pre. Not very accurate in this case, but I've seen it be accurate enough to find my house before.

    { "errorCode": 0, "timestamp": 1249855555954.000000, "latitude": 36.594108, "longitude": -82.183260, "horizAccuracy": 2523, "heading": 0, "velocity": 0, "altitude": 0, "vertAccuracy": 0 }

    Here they can tell every WebOS app I use, and for how long.

    { "appid": "com.palm.app.phone", "event": "close", "timestamp": 1250006362 }
    { "appid": "com.palm.app.messaging", "event": "launch", "timestamp": 1250006422 }
    { "appid": "com.palm.app.messaging", "event": "close", "timestamp": 1250006446 }

    It sends the above info on a daily basis.

    2009-08-10t09:15:10z upload /var/context/pending/1249895710-contextfile.gz.contextlog ok rdx-30681971
    2009-08-11t09:15:10z upload /var/context/pending/1249982110-contextfile.gz.contextlog ok rdx-31306808

    There is also some info that is recorded when a WebOS app crashes. Now, I've seen WebOS crash hard a time or two, but it turns out apps are crashing fairly frequently behind the scenes, and each such crash is logged and a system state snapshot taken. At least some of these are uploaded, though if things are crashing a whole lot it will be throttled.

    2009-08-09T17:01:22Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_59.tgz OK RDX-30246857
    2009-08-09T17:05:36Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_26.tgz OK RDX-30249465
    2009-08-09T17:09:11Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_56.tgz OK RDX-30252374
    2009-08-09T17:11:46Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_70.tgz OK RDX-30253958
    2009-08-09T17:16:29Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_67.tgz ERR_UPLOAD_THROTTLED_DAILY
    2009-08-09T17:17:28Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_51.tgz ERR_UPLOAD_THROTTLED_DAILY
    2009-08-09T17:20:40Z upload /var/log/rdxd/pending/rdxd_log_21.tgz ERR_UPLOAD_THROTTLED_DAILY

    Each tarball contains a kernel dmesg, syslog, a manifest.txt listing all installed ipkg packages (including third-party apps), a backtrace of the crash, a df (from which they can tell I'm using Debian on the phone), and ps -f output listing all processes owned by root (but not by joey).

    The uploading is handled by uploadd, which reads /etc/uploadd.conf:

    [SERVER=rdx]
    RepositoryURL=https:///palmcsext/prefRequest?prefkey=APPLICATIONS,RDX_SRV
    UploadURL=https:///palmcsext/RDFileReceiver

    [SERVER=context]
    RepositoryURL=https:///palmcsext/prefRequest?prefkey=APPLICATIONS,RDX_SRV
    UploadURL=https:////palmcsext/RDFileReceiver

    The "HOST" this is sent to via https is ps.palmws.com.

    My approach to disable this, which may not stick across WebOS upgrades, was to comment out the 'exec' line in /etc/event.d/uploadd and reboot. However, then I noticed a contextupload process running. This is started by dbus, so the best way to disable it seems to be: rm /usr/bin/contextupload

    BTW, since Palm has lawyers, they have a privacy policy, which covers their ass fairly well regarding all this, without going into details or making clear that the above data is being uploaded.

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    1. Re:TFA Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to provide a link to ps.palmws.com too... It's amazing what Slashdotting can do =)

  25. After all the concerns about privacy today... by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1

    What idiot thought doing this without user opt-in was a good idea?

    1. Re:After all the concerns about privacy today... by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      A marketing drone, of course.

    2. Re:After all the concerns about privacy today... by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      There is user opt in. But it is in the fine print and when you set up the phone. When I got mine the sales person set up the phone, but handed it to me to click this page. So I believe in this case they are legally covered.
      But if how do they know if all the sales people are doing this for sure? That's another question, which getting the answer to would be fun. Especially if it involves a lawsuit.

  26. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    To see if the issue is related to the towers you are connecting to.

    Which they get by the cellular infrastructure backhaul, rather than by GPS.

  27. article on precentral.net (soon to be slashdotted) by tony.damato · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.precentral.net/fyi-pre-reports-your-location-palm

    When PreCentral's people asked Palm about this, their official statement to them in part was:

            Our goal has been to follow industry best practices on data collection, use, and encryption. Like most EULAs and privacy policies, though, the terms tend to get pretty detailed about potential scenarios. And because the terms are meant to notify users about all possible variations, we wanted to err on the side of over notifying rather than under notifying users through the terms of use. So there's really nothing here "beyond the norm" for a EULA or privacy policy.

            The provision you've quoted explains why Palm might collect user information. For example, we collect and transmit users' email addresses, email content, contact lists, etc. to provide WebOS services such as back-up and restore for the purpose of backing up that data and helping users restore the data if needed (in that case, it would not be limited to just the email address collected at registration). If users someday make purchases on their device through the Apps Catalog, then we would also collect payment information to process the transaction.

            At all times, we'd be strictly bound by our privacy policy. Our privacy policy, like virtually all others in the industry, contemplate our using data to provide services users have requested, improve our products and services (hence the reference to Palm's own "sales and marketing" in the privacy policy), troubleshoot, etc. We also refer to affiliates because Palm is a global company, and we may need to transmit data from our European subsidiary to the parent company. We're obviously not a conglomerate with many different subs and affiliates, but the terms specifically mention subs and affiliates so that we can comply with European data protection laws that require us to spell out that data collected by a European sub can be transmitted to another part of the company.

  28. Well, this sucks if your a Canadian by Mr.Fork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Canada's privacy laws disallows this, especially not notifying the user. As soon as it leaks out to the CRTC and the Privacy Commish, they may disallow this device for sale in Canada later this month.

    But my god, what was Palm thinking? Disappointing.

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
    1. Re:Well, this sucks if your a Canadian by dude111 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i think you meant to say: Well, this sucks unless you're a Canadian"

    2. Re:Well, this sucks if your a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada's privacy laws disallows this, especially not notifying the user. As soon as it leaks out to the CRTC and the Privacy Commish, they may disallow this device for sale in Canada later this month.

      Yeah nice thought, but the criminal code covers fraud, extortion and theft yet Rogers cellular use these criminal tactics in their everyday business, and have done so with impunity for many years now. This statement is not libellous as it is a statement of fact.

      If Aliant, Bell or Rogers want the device, they'll get it; regardless of what any laws say. Laws only apply to you and I, and only when convenient.

    3. Re:Well, this sucks if your a Canadian by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      THAT's the part you think sucks?

      Personally, I'm glad we have a government that sees this kind of thing as a problem as opposed to an, uh, opportunity.

  29. In other news... by awrz · · Score: 1

    ...with the realization that conventional advertising no-longer works the way it once did --- companies are mining data to deliver targeted advertising to consumers.

    Nothing to see here.

    Move along.

    --
    "--wine; a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy." --Benjamin Franklin
  30. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by Otto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it's the cellular companies that want that data more. By having the phones report back on position and cell tower ID strengths, they can more easily map "dead zones" in their coverage areas, telling them where to put new towers to hit the most people.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  31. They've busted it now by Stu101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this is true, it strikes at the very heart of the products saleability. The pre is quite the phone in geek worlds, which unfortunatly for them, tend to be the ones that care about stuff like this!

    By doing this they have alienated a real core market that could have made the Pre a good geek phone rather than a has been phone.

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    1. Re:They've busted it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is either going to turn out to be a bunch of rubbish (false alarm), or turn out to be a the first great example as to why the ordinary man or woman on the street should look for a phone with a free (open source) operating system, and with free (open source) applications.

    2. Re:They've busted it now by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      By doing this they have alienated a real core market that could have made the Pre a good geek phone rather than a has been phone.

      Note to Palm: Get out the sword. Pick who's gonna fall on it (and yes, it has to be the guy who actually green-lighted this). Issue humble apology. Repeat as needed.

      --someone who was planning to buy a Pre as soon as it hit Verizon

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  32. Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by isThisNameAvailable · · Score: 1

    Palm provides an OTA backup service to ease restores. You opt into it when you start the phone and can turn it off at any time. Obviously it sends this and all sorts of data to their servers. Considering that TFA doesn't mention disabling this service, I have to wonder if he's a) right b) malicious c) stupid.

    1. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by joey · · Score: 1

      I actually have the backup service enabled, but I would not expect it to "back up" my GPS location,
      and the data collection I found is pretty clearly not done as part of that backup.

      --
      see shy jo
    2. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      Have you tried tracking down the application that actually captures the GPS coordinates for the report int he first place? I'm guessing it's probably LunaSysMgr responsible for maintaining the entire thing. Thank you very much for reporting this. I will be very curious what additional information I can glean when I get home tonight and screw around with my Pre.

      PS Nice uid ;D

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    3. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by joey · · Score: 1

      LunaSysMgr has a hook in it to palm://com.palm.contextupload/contextUpload

      There is a "contextupload" ipkg; all it contains is the daemon and dbus hook.

      I haven't found which piece handles writing to /var/context/ yet.

      --
      see shy jo
    4. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      I'm mostly convinced now that /usr/bin/contextupload itself creates all of it. I could not find any reference to /var/context or contextupload in any of the jars in /usr/lib/luna/java, but I do see lots of relevant strings in the contextupload binary. Quick five-minute analysis follows.
      (strings output)
      libz.so.1
      gzopen
      gzclose
      gzwrite
      gzerror
      * No reference to gzread -- makes me fairly certain it is doing compression and not decompression, i.e. archive creation.
      Creating /var/context failed
      Creating /var/context/pending failed
      luna://com.palm.location/getCurrentPosition
      {"accuracy":3,"maximumAge":86400}
      * That service call is what actually provides coordinates based on GPS, cell, etc.
      luna://com.palm.taskScheduler/scheduleTask
      {"uri":"luna://com.palm.contextupload/contextUploadTask", "repeatInterval": 86400000, "key": "contextUpload", "arguments":{}}
      * The scheduler service is probably the mechanic used here to actually make it upload periodically.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    5. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      what does it include if location services and the GPS are set to off?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    6. Re:Did he actually try turning off Palm Profile? by joey · · Score: 1

      Every app you run, when it was started, when it was closed.

      If an app crashes, the fill list of installed apps (including homebrew); plus information like df, ps, etc.

      --
      see shy jo
  33. This just in... by kpainter · · Score: 1

    Palm announces a new model that doesn't phone home. It will be called the "Palm Post"

  34. False alarm. Move along. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Allows Google to automatically collect anonymouse location data to improve the quality of location services.

    OK, OK, OK, it is google which is collecting the data. Since they are not evil, it should not matter. A simple case of false alarm. Cool down guys, there is nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  35. What's the big deal? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Do people not think that AT&T doesn't know where you are with your iphone? Or that Apple doesn't know what apps you downloaded from the app store?

    It might not be fun to think about, but the cell phone companies know where you are calling from, who you are calling and how long you talk to everyone.

    Come to think of it, so do the land line companies.

    As for smart phones, particularly if you have loaded apps for local weather, news, movies, food, etc. Exactly how is it supposed to work without the company knowing your location?

    I guess, Palm and Sprint could have notified their customers, although it does seem to be common sense. Then again, the credit card companies don't notify people that they are selling lists of what you purchase and where, too.

    The moral of the story--if you want to be in a connected society, live with it.

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They know what towers you are connected to without GPS location data

  38. Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm.. isn't this exactly what Microsoft have done with 'Genuine Advantage'. sure there's no tie-in between IP address and true geographic location but I'm sure if there were a good lookup system, then it would be used on the IP addresses that Genuine Advantage does collect.

  39. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by Renraku · · Score: 1

    So that law enforcement can subpoena Palm and ask for user location at x time on the day of x crime, to determine if they're in the area.

    I bet this is a new 'service' they offer.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  40. Re:1984 by SBrach · · Score: 1

    Your attempt to reason is thoughtcrime, comrade.

  41. Idiots that don't read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you guys aren't happy with these, then big deal!! Move on. Most of the poepl here commenting don't even have this phone. Who cares if they have ur info. Plus it was in the T&c when you activated it

  42. Hack it! by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So why not hack the thing so it sends what you want it to send? Somewhere innocuous, somewhere whimsical, or just random locations. You could have fun with this.

    "Yes, I really was at the North Pole yesterday. And in Paris the day before. Isn't air travel great!"

    ...laura

    1. Re:Hack it! by Lord_Byron · · Score: 1

      Also, I really think they should do something about all those Photoshop crashes I've been getting, don't you? :)

      For that matter, since there appears to be no authentication on the data, you don't even have to hack the Pre - just start sending them all manner of false data.

    2. Re:Hack it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSA mouthbreather: "Very vell, miss Hackerlady. Vee see you vere in Paris two days ago. Are you a terrorist? YOU ARE, AREN'T YOU!"

  43. Isn't this what it is supposed to do. by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    When you buy palm you agree that it backs itself up to the palm servers. users are notified and sign on to this.I don't see why they need GPS but the rest is resonable.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  44. Re:article on precentral.net (soon to be slashdott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod up and bold that "backup and restore" bit. You opt-in to this when you activate your device and it can be turned off and tweaked anytime you like from within the UI.

    WebOS is filled with options designed to protect your location privacy. You have to check like five boxes before Google Maps can even use GPS. You have to specifically approve the use of GPS in each individual app that requires it.

    The guy in TFA is either an idiot or out to burn Palm.

  45. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1) Watches, analyzes, and controls your every move to identify possible revolutionaries."

    You never read the book did you?

    In the book the point is made that people *do not know* when they are being monitored.

    "There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live -- did live, from habit that became instinct -- in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

    The same is happening now. It could be your phone, your internet use, a CCTV camera in the street... one of them might be monitored, and this instils the fear that keeps people subdued.

  46. I have a GSM phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I know that it sends stuff much more often than every few hours (maybe a couple times of an hour) because of the interference it creates when I'm listening to my mp3 player when the phone starts transmitting.

    1. Re:I have a GSM phone by tengwar · · Score: 1

      If it's a "da-da-daah da-da-daah da-da-daah" interference pattern, that's a location update. Why yours is doing it so often, I don't know. Other than an odd manufacturer, my main guess would be that you are in poor coverage. If the phone drops out of coverage, it will call in when it re-associates. Sending or receiving an SMS would cause it, as would using GPRS (do you poll for email?).

    2. Re:I have a GSM phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "dit, dit di-dit, dit di-dit, dit di-dit" and all GSM phones do it several times an hour. It's part of the protocol.

      Spend a day with your phone next to some speakers and you'll realize how often it does it.

  47. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you have selective analysis skills. I can easily add "Watches, analyzes, and controls your every move" to the second list.

    Of course, the whole first list *except* 1) 2) and 3) is already implemented by the good ol'US of A.

  48. Palm Pre Location Reporting or Track My Stolen Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Johnny,
    That is quite interesting. Oddly enough, I wish I knew how to access the gps coordinates of my palm pre info remotely in real time ...

    I had my palm pre, credit card, ID, and keys stolen this weekend, and since have been attempting to track the thief in the hopes of either A) Getting my property back or B) Busting this punk

    So last Sunday, I began the process of canceling credit cards, changing locks, and checking my Sprint Pre account.

    (Some other things I did right away, was change my yahoo email password since my Pre is set to auto fetch my emails, and set my VM to require a password every time its checked by calling my own phone number and accessing settings through the automation thing.)

    When I logged into sprint.com, I first checked my phone usage, and was able to identify a window when the theft took place based on the last call I made and the first call the thief made.

    This was between 2:45 am and 5:45 am 8/9/09.
    From that time the thief made several calls throughout the early morning and afternoon.

    From the usage page on sprint.com, I navigated to the Online Tools page, where I found a few interesting links regarding Mobile Location Services, Family Location Services, and GPS Privacy.

    I went ahead and called the sprint rep, who didn't know anything about these mobile phone locating services.

    He eventually found the option to add the Family Location Service to my account. But before adding anything to my account, the rep had a great idea of first suspending my text messaging to my phone as to not tip off the thief via text notification that a tracking service has been added to the phone.
    At this point, I was thinking I might actually locate my stolen phone back!!!

    After suspending the texts, we went through with the Family Location link where I had to first accept some sort of mobile privacy thing online.

    I was also able to indicate that I wanted to send emails to my inbox upon locating the phone, which I did. There are some other settings like how often the phone is auto-texted regarding the service, so I set that to the least often.

    Once I was directed to the location page (http://sfl.sprintpcs.com/finder-sprint-family/signIn.htm) I was taken to a preview of the greater Denver area and a button to the right "LOCATE"

    When the locate button is pressed, it uses triangulation to hone in on the phones location but it will only work when the phone is physically turned on.
    It doesn't have to be making a call, but service must be active and phone on to triangulate its position.

    After like 30 minutes of trying to locate this guy, to my surprise, the map panned over to a new area of Colorado and displayed an icon with a large blue area circle around the icon of the estimated zone where the phone could be. It actually said "within 700 yards" .... not quite pin point accuracy.

    SCREENSHOT OF STOLEN PALM PRE LOCATED VIA TRIANGULATION NOT GPS
    http://imgur.com/41413.jpg

    It did also offer an address, but again, this is a complete estimation, and could presumably not be used as fact.

    This guy has been using my phone for roughly three days now on and off, and I am constantly tracking him. I save the locations to "My Places" in the Family Locator website, and I am getting all this info together, along with all the phone numbers this guy has been calling and receiving to provide to the cops for the report or some Old Country Italian BOys!!

    BUT, I'm trying to find anyway I can either somehow use palms GPS coordinates, or any advanced tracking mechanism to really have a case.

    Any recommendations anyone.....

  49. OMG the sky is falling ... by daveime · · Score: 1

    It has come to the author's attention that every time a user browses a web page, the following information is sent to the website's owner, without any formal warning or opt-out procedure made available to the end-user :-

    1. Date / Time information
    2. IP address (which can be used to establish the user's geographic position)
    3. Browser Software information and details of installed extensions.
    4. Data from cookies (which of course everyone knows contains viruses, spyware and other nasty shit).
    5. The address of the webpage requested (which could be used to track user's browsing habits)

    And worst of all, this data is collected possibly indefinately (or until the server's hard disk is full of access.log files anyway), and is known to be used to aggregate stats using AWSTATS and other "stat" software which displays coloured graphs and details on countries, browsers, time spent on the site, number of pages visited etc. With no regard whatsoever to the European and other Data Protection laws, and no method of having this personal data removed from these servers.

    It's only a matter of time before unscrupulous website owners start using this data to decide website policies such as popular language support, versions of pages suitable for mobile and other devices, and perhaps even to sell us something we MIGHT NOT WANT !!!

    THIS HAS TO STOP, THIS SPYING ON USERS IS CRIMINAL AND MUST STOP NOW !!!

    Yours,
    Chicken Little

  50. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's strange. You had a really good argument, there was no need to twist the facts in your favor.

    > 1) Retrieves information when your phone software crashes

    People aren't up in arms about a product sending a crash report, they're up in arms because the device sends GPS coordinates of your location. Sure, this isn't 1984, but this also isn't innocuous debug data.

  51. Okay, they can have my data ... but! by nilbog · · Score: 1

    Okay, they can have my data, but guess what else they're getting? A whole lot of randomly generated crap data. What's this? I was in antarctica only moments ago and now I'm on the beach in Hawaii? I'm opening hundreds of apps a minute - all of which are crashing immediately?

    They can have my data, they just won't be able to make it useful.

    --
    or else!
  52. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2009 Obama administration?

  53. And they'd have gotten away with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if it wasn't for you pesky kids

  54. I wonder how they remember to breathe? by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

    The Palm people -- all their pieces and parts since they split the hardware from the OS and then killed the OS and began to make crappy hardware that they don't support -- have got to be robots. They're so stupid they obviously can't breathe on their own.

    1. Re:I wonder how they remember to breathe? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They remember to breathe by breathing along with every breath you take. They'll be watching you.

  55. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The present US government has many of the characteristics listed above.

    1 - collecting lists of people who provide "bad" information. check.

    2 - running banks, mortgage companies, auto companies. Setting salaries and bonuses. check.

    3 - not happening

    4 - see 1.

    5 - uses government largess to subdue the masses - just promise them more stuff, don't worry about paying for it. check.

    6 - rewrites history, opinion, etc. Obama said that he was for a single payer system. His folks say that he isn't. check. check. check. many examples.

    7 - they just sick Pelosi on us.

    8 - the cop acted "stupidly" in arresting someone who broke into a house and then would not identify himself properly to a police officer. Turning a police incident about a nasty man into a racial incident. check.

    five out of eight ain't bad

  56. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    As long as you have a computing system that can have more than one item in memory at one time, it starts to get very important how these things interact. Microsoft learned this a long time ago that applications could interact in destructive ways.

    Maybe the folks a Palm figured that out as well. Do you not think it possible that your third-party application could impact Palm applications? And that it might be an important clue that thousands of dumps come in with each and every one of them having the same mysterious application instaled?

    Would you rather the attitude be that if you install software this removes any support obligation from Palm?

  57. Does this do when over seas / data roaming and you by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Does this do when over seas / data roaming and you get a big data bill?

    If so as this a Sprint phone with a 2 year lock in and forced data can they bill for data roaming that can not be turned off with out hacking the phone and it's not like you are useing the data the phone is doing it on it's own?

  58. who was the programmer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely the individual tasked to implement this feature knew what they were doing? It's a safe bet that they *also* read slashdot. Just because someone tells me to do something wrong doesn't mean I have to do it. If we (slashdotters) all seem to be so concerned about privacy, why are we so willing to implement an obviously dubious feature?

    Even assuming that this was an "implement or be fired" situation, surely there are simple solutions to give all parties what they want. For example, reduce the geolocating accuracy - within 50 miles is going to provide 90% of what marketing would like, and not (particularly) compromise anonymity. Alternatively, an opt in screen at data send time. There are many alternatives.

    We understand the value of privacy better than most. We need to make sure this understanding is not only part of our rhetoric, but also our daily practice.

    1. Re:who was the programmer? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Didn't Palm outsource all of its coding to India?

      In which case, there may or may not be the capability of wasting work time to read Slashdot like I'm doing. From what I hear, most of the programming facilities there are pretty restrictive of web access. I suppose the coders might access Slashdot from home, but ...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  59. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    That would be done with the tower data, not by querying individual phones. Although both are related to cellular service, they're miles apart in terms of privacy issues. Plus, the data would actually be relevant and accurate from the towers, unlike occasional positions from a phone.

  60. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1
    Well you would think that Palm would have written the OS in such a way that, like Windows, and *nix, that the OS does not care what the application is or what it is doing so long as it stays within its own memory.

    Provide an API of functions an application can access, make sure an app stays in its own memory, via the API do not allow the application to have access to say the contacts with out a system message being displayed to the user first, etc.

    As long as you have a computing system that can have more than one item in memory at one time, it starts to get very important how these things interact. Microsoft learned this a long time ago that applications could interact in destructive ways.

    Microsoft did learn this, they gave each process its own memory space and required that each application say within its own allocated space.

    Would you rather the attitude be that if you install software this removes any support obligation from Palm?

    Dell, HP, and Microsoft do not void the warranty if you install software on your computer. They tell you that you have to first restore your system to its factory settings. Why not do the same thing with a palm pre?

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  61. Re:Does this do when over seas / data roaming and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happened to have been overseas recently (but no roaming; I used wifi the whole time). My Pre failed
    to get GPS coordinates during the whole trip, so I imagine it didn't report that, but it did manage to upload several crash reports over wifi while I was abroad. My Pre has 1.2 mb of those that are still pending upload, after 1 month of use.

  62. Oblig Old Greb Reference by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 1

    Ya wanna go to a club where people wee on each other?

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  63. Re:Does this do when over seas / data roaming and by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Roaming (data or voice) can be turned off on the Pre without hacking. It's on the Preferences screen for the dialer app.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  64. Re:1984 by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    OK, maybe Palm is not like 1984... but looking over your list is a little scary seeing as we seem to have 6 or 7 of the 8 conditions going on currently.

    --
    This space available.
  65. Re:Apps installed OK, crashes OK, location - HELL by RedK · · Score: 1

    Except these updates are daily, not every second. So Palm knows where you are once per day. And it's not clear that they have any identification information that they can use to link a certain report to a certain user. Unless your carrier informs Palm of which user bought which Palm Pre, in which case, we have a whole other privacy issue on our hands.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  66. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had 1,6,7,8 with George Bush. Not 2 as he deregulated everything.
    I guess because of the Utah Mormons, California has 3. Texas still outlaws sodomy, so they have 3 as well.
    The pro-weed movement want 5, a nation of stoned junkies in a perpetual state of altered reality. Luckily they are a vocal minority and not a majority.
    China seems to have 4, I don't think we do yet.

    Scary. :(

  67. Re:1984 by twostix · · Score: 1

    "An ultra-facist, ultra controlling government that..."

    You're wrong as it was an ultra socialist government based 100% on the Soviet Communist party and as Orwell believed (and had personal experience with in Spain) would be the logical outcome of the English left wing "intelligentsias" (who he had absolutely no love for) writings and beliefs of the day.

    Orwell himself became a Democratic Socialist due to the extreme levels of poverty and wealth disparity he had seen when he went on the road disguised as a vagabond to research his book "A Road to Wigan Pier". BUT he was under no illusion of what the extreme form of socialism (as advocated by many many people on the left at the time) would become should it be implemented, which is why he wrote two books on the subject and hundreds of letters, reviews and essays against not only the Fascists but also Communists and the useful idiots in the academic left wing who fawned over the Russian style of Socialism rather than wanting to maintain a democracy that had Socialist tendencies as Orwell advocated for.

    The more you know.

    P.S I've noticed that as a country politically moves to the right the "baddies" in old fiction suddenly become left wing and when a country moves to the left the "baddies" in the same books suddenly become right wing, I'm not sure if that's a problem or not (outside of the cognitive dissonance it displays).

  68. Anyone know of a GPS shield? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would realy like to shield my phone's GPS capability if I don't have FAIR use of technology that I payed-for. If I can't use it, then I want it disabled. What frequencies need to be jammed? Particularly the reason I want it disabled is because I don't want it reporting errors or waypoint and route information that might prejudice my right to the road with a legislated rate of movement. The same goes for the software. I would intend to plug a USB wifi adapter into my phone, use my network stack and application on my phone, to route telecommunications to the non-Cell-network of my choice. A modern phone is a glorified pda and CB Radio that's been biased by some FCC losers; I wouldn't mind being able to use my phone as a chat host and moderator with my antenna for the area as we once did back in analog phone networks that could inter-operate with HAM radio hosts.

    It's getting lame quick! Where are the kits that can hook onto an antenna to spoof and overide proprietary crap in my hands so that it can be for my intended use? Sure, some would say that Phone Service predominates to allow a good cell phone to be affordable by supplementing the cost over a 2year contract, but what about phones that are deemed obsolete or lost phones that were deactivated and then later recovered and not in any certain service contract? Mine, Mine, mine!

  69. Terrorist=use of force, intimidation, or fear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can do the work of an apprentice technician from time to time.

    My property wasn't available at the time your office was qualified for it's particular utilities to coordinate and execute its cause, so any further speculation on subject to my right will be seen as a threat of coerced domestication to a foreign principle; upon such finding will default my presence into a military remedy in pervue of the Coastal guards of these American state-Republics, for which you will be hung under water and deemed dead at low tide.

  70. Re:1984 by nxtw · · Score: 1

    Instead of TVs that watch you, we have cell phones that track our positions.

    No; we can choose to have cell phones that can be used to track our positions if they are turned on and registering to a network.

  71. Palm still the lesser of two evils. by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He's clocking out now to return it to the store he bought it from and promised to be headed to Bestbuy to pick up an iPhone 3GS on the way back...

    Honestly I think this would be a dumb move, being that Apple is more "evil" than Palm, and AT&T is more "evil" than Sprint.

    Consider this:

    * If Microsoft pulled even HALF the shenanigans Apple does ("fixing" iTunes when thrd parties figure out ho to sync to it, suing the competition, suing people who leak info on unreleased products, etc etc) they'd be hauled into court and sued into oblivion. But, Apple can still get away with it because they are not a monopoly and their products are hip/pretty/actually work well. Doesn't make it any less evil than if MSFT had done it.

    * iPhone is more closed than Pre. Yes yes, I know BSD kernel and all but there are gobs of proprietary stuff all over it. Much more opportunity to "do evil" and get away with it since it is tougher to hack. Per is comparitively open--they were MUCH quicker to release APIs, their software stack consists of far more Free software and it is architecturally VERY similar to several Free-software-friendly mobile devices (Beagleboard, Zoom, Always Innovating Touchbook, Pandora handheld). Making its Pres phone home is evil, but at least they are more open and honest than Apple has been known to be.

    * All phone companies are evil, but AT&T has the dubious distinction of being a full and wililng participant in warrantless wiretapping of its own customers. It comes from a monoloply heritage. Sprint is far less notorious in that capacity...it is merely known to be incompetent and bumbling at times.

    Given the choice I'd elect Pre over iPhone in a heartbeat--both the carriers and the handset manufacturers for the former are more trustworthy--or at the very least easier to keep an eye on. Apple makes the best designed and highest quality but I'm rather disenchanted with their long-time tactics of being ultra-closed. I thought that there was a chance they were changing their game when they went with Intel architecture on their Macs but since then they've proven their spots unchangeable. Pity that--they weren't that evil in their Apple II days--they sued clone makers for their blatant copyright violations but at least their machines were quite open. Perhaps if the other Steve steered the ship (but then Apple products would look far less sexy I suppose).

    At least with the Pre (besides being more powerful than the iPhone) if Palm is caught pulling shenanigans it is relatively easy to find and fix it. With Apple...not so sure...if they WERE found out doing something like this, not only would it be harder to turn off, Apple would sue your arse into oblivion if you told anyone about it.

  72. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uuh, didn't see the "1984" - I first thought you're writing about a real-world government. Well, actually, you are. Sad, but true. Maybe except points number 3 and 4.

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. palm pre TV commercial chick by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    this is off-topic, but must be mentioned... that chick in the pre TV commercials is very odd looking. it's actually kinda spooky how odd looking she is... sorta alien. it freaks me out and makes me feel like i just witnessed something wrong in a petri dish.

  75. fun fun fun false data injection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont have time - but does anyone else think it would be humourous and fitting to inject false information into their data gathering operation?

  76. Re:1984 by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Not to belittle your point, but as a citizen of this 1984 community, I seriously doubt you would even notice that you are being manipulated. Many of the points in your 1984 list could be argued as fulfilled, we're just so used to it that it doesn't seem that way.

    Take #2 - How long do you think you would be able to buy anything if our government shut off Visa? Or if the electronic networking that connected banks were to be brought down? How much money do you have in your wallet right now?

    Try #3 in a public place.

    #4 happens all the time in cases of abuse.

    #5 - Well duh.

    #6 is hard to prove. To many missing emails.

    #7 - Guantanamo. Ever heard of it?

    #8 has been demonstrated all week. Just check CNN and look for "Health care reform, town hall meetings"

    verses a private company that was caught with it's pants down. I'm sure the government will step in, but not because it cares about the law... There are bound to be government employees that will use Palm Pre's, and they certainly don't want THEIR locations and app usage getting out.

  77. Context-sensitive content and offers by TermV · · Score: 1

    Where you go, what applications you are using, what web sites you visit, what businesses you call are a marketing gold mine. A provider can analyse this information to serve you content that is appropriate to your interests and locations. Have you ever ordered pizza on your smart phone? You might be sent pizza coupons for the nearest pizza joint. Do you visit football web sites? You might get ads for the local football team when you're traveling on business. This is extremely creepy, but companies ARE working on developing this kind of technology.

  78. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storm in a teacup, look at the horizontal accuracy thats being sent, its ["horizAccuracy": 2523], that is 2500 mts or a 68% probability that the user is in a circle of diameter of 5000 meters.

    Its not a GPS location, most probably a cell ID location - that is to say, which base station is serving the user.

    This information is already known to the cell company anyway and is at a fairly rough level of accuracy.

  79. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You conveniently didn't "see" that the government that does 1-8 can subpoena the server data of said "private company."

    And, the phone is sending information that extends far beyond just "software crashes."

    If the data exists, the evildoers (whether government or private companies) can use it. Therefore, it is best to prevent tempting evil by avoiding collection in the first place.

  80. Same svc in Japan is for when you lose your phone by mattr · · Score: 1

    FWIW you can turn on GPS so when you lose your phone NTT DoCoMo can help you find it. Also for the very difficult to use but visually impressive map application. All said and done Palm is evil and I won't buy from them anymore but if you could just trust them this would otherwise be useful. In the end it makes the device LESS useful since you can't trust them. I think expecting location privacy from a cellphone is a mistaken endeavor. How can you prove it unless you run your own firewall on the phone?