Slashdot Mirror


Dell Says High Linux Netbook Returns a "Non-Issue"

Michiel Roos notes that at this week's OpenSource World, a Dell executive deflated Microsoft's claims that Linux notebooks have return rates four or five times higher than Windows machines. "Todd Finch, Dell senior product marketing manager, said the number of Linux returns are approximately the same as those for Windows netbooks. He categorized the matter of returns as a 'non-issue.' 'They are making something of nothing,' he said of Microsoft's claims."

34 of 324 comments (clear)

  1. IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The end of the article plugs Dell's IdeaStorm which has these as top ideas:

    1. 115170: Pre-Installed OpenOffice | alternative to MS Works & MS Office
    2. 105120: Have Firefox pre-installed as default browser
    3. 103950: No Extra Software Option
    4. 101110: Pre-Installed Linux | Ubuntu | Fedora | OpenSUSE | Multi-Boot
    5. 86980: Provide Linux Drivers for all your Hardware
    6. 72510: No OS Preloaded
    7. 53180: Sell Linux PCs Worldwide - not only the United States
    8. 46690: Stripped down, fast Linux Box
    9. 39970: coreboot (formerly LinuxBIOS) instead of proprietary BIOS

    So maybe only open source users know about IdeaStorm? Regardless, Dell is staring down hundreds of thousands of users looking for more options that should honestly be very easy to provide. So if the returns are a "non-issue" and are similar to Windows returns then what's the deal, Dell?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect that, while the enthusiasm on ideastorm is real, it isn't wildly representative.

      Think about the people who are actually passionate about computer related stuff: You've got the Linux and/or FOSS guys, the hardcore gamers, the Mac-heads, some true Microsofties, and that's about it. Almost everybody else uses them, and wants them to work; but isn't going to spend their leisure time posting on some Dell messageboard about it.

      Of those groups, the hardcore gamers and the Mac-heads wouldn't give Dell the time of day if they were on fire(in aggregate, obviously there are gamers with Dells; and the Mini-9 hackintosh crew; but the more passionately you are a member of those groups, the less likely you are to be running a Dell), while the Microsofties can already get all the MS software they want from Dell, so they have no reason to complain. Linux/FOSS enthusiasts are pretty much the only ones I'd expect to show up.

    2. Re:IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by operator_error · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would 100,000 people [with valid Dell site user-registrations] who don't care show up on Dell's webpage to click on that arrow?

      100,000 registered folks seems compelling to me, and most anyone listening, Dell. I tried to click the up arrow, but user-registration is required first.

      Still, I think M$ forces Dell's & Asus' (etc.) hand by hidden fees & bulk-discounts related to the M$ tax.

    3. Re:IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by mpapet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dell is staring down hundreds of thousands of users looking for more options that should honestly be very easy to provide.

      I can tell you from personal experience, none of those things are 'easy.' Yes, some of them are very easy for you and I. But we're talking about a huge unwieldy corporate machine where every good intention/new idea from the bottom of the org chart is unwelcome and punished.

      FYI, for most people at any sufficiently large organization, the customer is at the very bottom of the org chart.

      If the CEO drove these changes without endless, mind-numbing discussion and rooms full of people notifying her of the 'dangers' it would be a different story. But that's just not how it works at that level.

      Coreboot would be at the very top of my list. From there, the user is free-er to do what they please with the computer. Words cannot describe how important that project is to the future of computing. Please, go help coreboot out.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    4. Re:IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      you did not put the rest on the list...

      They get wierd after #15...

      16. Sell it with a free pony.
      17. Can I get mine in plaid?
      18. I want fur everywhere on it.
      19. Get rid of the keyboard and put a mouse in the middle.
      20. PONIES!!!!!!!
      21. Stop making them so confusing, What it is with having the whole alphabet on the keyboard.
      22. Send it via Email instead of FedEx.
      23. Make it waterproof, I'm on my third one because of spills.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:IdeaStorm's Top Ideas by fortyonejb · · Score: 5, Informative

      You say that, but did you look at the numbers on that page? The OpenOffice recommendation has more than 100,000 upvotes. Why would 100,000 people who don't care show up on Dell's webpage to click on that arrow?

      Before your misinformation gets too far, a little clarification, Dell's IdeaStorm increments by 10 for each vote, meaning it has received 10,000 upvotes, not 100,000.

  2. Summary by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Essentially most of the initial high return rate was due to unclear advertising leading people to believe they were buying a window machine and getting linux. Dell has cleared up the advertising to make sure people know what they are buying and the high return rate has stopped.

    1. Re:Summary by CannonballHead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So in other words, now we should pay attention to sales rates of Windows vs. Linux, not just return rates?

    2. Re:Summary by sbeckstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A few billion of MS's profits. Well they went somewhere, just not to M$. And whether MS fanboys want to admit it or not what MS did is criminal.

    3. Re:Summary by sbeckstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hardly worth the effort to reply but "What?" I don't think any of those words mean what you think they do.
      In what way were the corporate convictions against MS "so-called"? They were, I assure you, quite real. Remember that a corporation can be convicted of a crime and no one go to jail. However fines are a very real sanction against a criminal corporation.
      A political stunt no, not even close. MS was convicted of illegal restraint of trade and mis-use of a monopoly. Don't believe me look it up. I may not have the exact statutes that they violated but violate them they did. There is nothing "so-called" about them.

  3. Playing with words by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft's Turner said that Linux netbooks are being returned at a rate 4 to 5 times higher than Windows netbooks. Dell hasn't disputed this fact at all. Linux netbooks *are* being returned at a very high rate, and Dell's Finch says so right in the article:

    Where consumers have returned machines, Finch said, it wasn't because of technical problems but because they'd bought a low-priced machine expecting Windows and opened it to find a different interface.

    The difference is that people are returning the Windows netbooks because of technical reasons (broken hardware) and Linux netbooks because they don't want Linux.

    That's a win for Microsoft, no matter how you spin it.

    1. Re:Playing with words by HermMunster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are missing the point. Dell says they are not receiving returns except at the same rate. He means that linux netbooks are being returned at the same rate as windows netbook returns. Now, Dell is the company that sells and accepts the returns. Microsoft has nothing to do with it. Microsoft has no first hand knowledge. Since they can't count Linux returns, as it has nothing to do with Windows returns, Microsoft would be clueless except maybe by receiving information from Microsoft funded reports.

      Bottom line is that Dell is giving facts whereas Microsoft is giving conjecture.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    2. Re:Playing with words by Angst+Badger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a win for Microsoft, no matter how you spin it.

      Well, maybe. The open source ecosystem has long since become large enough to be self-sustaining, so it's questionable how much it matters that Microsoft still has a majority of the market share. If MS went bankrupt tomorrow, it would be a minor win for Linux but mostly a huge win for Apple, and Apple's behavior as a company suggests strongly that they would be no less unpleasant as a near-monopoly than Microsoft currently is.

      The important thing to me is that I have multiple free (in both senses) alternatives to MS and that those are not likely to go away in the foreseeable future. Would I like to buy a laptop without the Microsoft tax. Sure, but then, I pretty much already can, since I usually buy year-old off-lease corporate laptops at a steep discount -- being neither a hardcore gamer nor a videographer, most machines have been more than fast enough for everything else for several years now.

      If the whole Free/Open Source Software movement was a battle for our freedom, we already won, and won decisively. The battle against Microsoft's very existence? Who cares? Odds are, Microsoft will be around for a long time to come, and waiting for it to die is like waiting for Apple or one of the *BSDs or any other stable niche offering to die: time better spent having actual fun and getting real work done.

      Besides, it's not like Dell's products or their customer support are very good to begin with. When I can buy generic, standard laptop parts to build my own laptop as well as I can build my own desktop boxes, then I'll get excited. Until then, the token gestures of companies selling proprietary, closed hardware are really nothing to become overly concerned about.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    3. Re:Playing with words by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually. Technically. The article says the same amount of returns for each... and I bet they sell a lot more windows machines, still...

      From TFA:

      ... we don't see a significant difference between the return rate for Windows versus the rate for Linux.

      So technically the article says return rate. Earlier the (very short) FA talked about the number of returns being the same but I believe that the explicit mention of rate clears up any possible ambiguity. A marketing manager might easily use the word number when he meant numbers or rate but his use of return rate seems completely unambiguous.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    4. Re:Playing with words by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which exact part of

      we don't see a significant difference between the return rate for Windows versus the rate for Linux

      is it that you have difficulty reading. What he's saying is that Windows machines return at the approximately same rate for technical problems as Linux machines return due to both technical problems and misunderstandings. This implies that if they can improve their communication then the return rate of Linux machines will be significantly lower than the return rate for Windows machines. To be honest I have difficulty working out why. Surely the hardware should be pretty much the same? Is it possible that the rate of malware infection at the beginning of a modern, up to date, Windows system's life is really high enough to account for the extra Windows returns?

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:Playing with words by agnosticnixie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the initial high rates data came from MSI - they slapped a default install of OpenSUSE on it, didn't bother to make sure the drivers worked, and sold that.

  4. Here's another fact. by iCantSpell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That fact that a multi-billion dollar corporation is making up lies about free software on a daily basis is just another sign of true weakness.

  5. Not Surprised.. by schon · · Score: 5, Informative

    ASUS said the same thing about the EeePC return rates.

    As far as I can tell, the "higher return rates" source is MSI, who shipped a borked distro. Everyone else seems to be doing swimmingly.

  6. Re:in your face microsoft! by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Dell, and TFA, Linux netbooks don't have high returns vs. windows netbooks.

  7. Not surprised by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People buying these machines know they ship with Ubuntu. It says so right on the website, and the button you click, and repeats it when you checkout. People aren't returning these machines more because they have Ubuntu, they're buying them more because they have Ubuntu.

    Now, if only this would rub off on the rest of the business sectors. I'd love to buy a new Studio 15 laptop with the option for Ubuntu. It'd save me 45 minutes formatting, reinstalling Ubuntu and reconfiguring the system the way I like. But unfortunately their selection for machines with Ubuntu only includes the crap Inspiron line (the Ford Fiesta of laptops).

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  8. Re:in your face microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The people who return Linux netbooks do so because they can't find the big blue "e" on the desktop. To hell with them, I say.

    Linux is fucking king now. Linux shits all over the chests and faces of the MS-loving ignorami and fucks their wives and sisters. The strong survive and run or migrate to Linux, the weak do not live on because they are cuckolded by Linux users.

    We, the Linux users, are fucking king...no, GODS. We are the gods who demand sacrifice! Ha. Ha ha. HahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!

    -- Ethanol-fueled

  9. So they creatively interpreted the numbers? by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh noes, how could they!

    This will put a serious dent in their excellent credibility track record..

  10. Re:in your face microsoft! by HermMunster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me thinks he's been nipping at the ethanol a bit too much and it's not even noon.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  11. Re:Microsoft is fighting back by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That must be exactly why Microsoft has the astoundingly successful "You find it, you keep it" ad campaign going, with Dell and HP laptops prominently featured.

  12. Re:Troll? or data... you decide. by Scragglykat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't think you could return a Mac without first signing a legal document binding you to not speak of the return to anyone for the rest of your life... guess we'll never know. :o)

  13. Re:in your face microsoft! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Problem is he was not drinking ethanol.. Methanol.. He's gone raving mad....

    Dang it, now he's drinking the salt water from the reef tank in the lobby. STOP THAT! I gotta go and try and catch him before the boss get's back.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Re:It does not matter by element-o.p. · · Score: 4, Informative

    What we should do, is to focus our efforts on make Linix and OSS technologies relevant to the average human being....Lets work on these so that if one takes the Linux plunge, that person gets pleasantly surprised.

    Have you looked at one of the Dell netbooks with Linux on it? We bought two Mini-9's for testing where I work; I got one, and one of the other network admins got the other. The things are awesome, except for a couple of minor gripes:

    1) A couple of tools that I expected (sshd, slocate, rsync) aren't available on the install or the on-line package repository, since it's a slightly lobotomized Dell-specific version of Ubuntu that's installed on the Mini-9;
    2) The software update site that Synaptic syncs from worked for about a month, then stopped working (I haven't bothered to call Dell to ask what happened, but I probably should so I can keep the OS updated);
    3) It occasionally will not resume after suspending.

    Item one problem won't matter to most users; just network geeks like myself. Item two is probably the biggest problem, but like I said, I haven't tried to contact Dell to see why synaptic/apt-get update/etc. can no longer connect to the update server. Item three also happens on my wife's Vista laptop, so doesn't seem to be a differentiating characteristic of Linux over Windows.

    On the other hand, the wireless (typically a weakness for Linux distros in my experience) is rock solid, quickly and easily connecting to wireless networks with no fuss and no hassle...very much unlike the wireless on my wife's Vista laptop, which frequently can't find wireless networks, won't stay connected in cases where it does, and/or provides mind-numbingly slow transfer rates when it can connect. Setting up network printers is again far easier and more reliable than the printer setup on my wife's Vista laptop, which has to be reconfigured every single time she reboots. As far as multimedia...I can play DVDs on my Mini-9, I can watch YouTube videos. As far as Firefox and Open Office...on Linux "suck[ing] big time", well...FF may be somewhat slower to run JavaScript and OOo may not have *all* the features or be as pretty as MS Office, but I'll take standards-compliant FF over IE and free OOo with all its faults over MS' $500 price tag and freaking annoying "ribbon" interface any day.

    In other words, I think the FOSS/Linux community has done a great deal to make Linux and OSS technologies relevant to the average human being. I see FOSS/Linux as pretty good already and getting even better, but YMMV.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  15. Re:Troll? or data... you decide. by gbarules2999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear user,

    Thank you for your question. Unfortunately, your question was not sleek, white, and shiny, so we are unable to process your request.

    Kisses,
    Apple Customer Service

  16. Dell UK. () by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect that, while the enthusiasm on ideastorm is real, it isn't wildly representative.

    It isn't representative of Dell UK, I can tell you much. End of last year, I bought the wife a new laptop. She's a fan of Ubuntu, so I got her a Dell Inspiron with Ubuntu preloaed. She loves it - never been the least bit bother.

    A month ago, my old laptop finally gave up the ghost, and I thought (seeing as how the Missus' machine was so reliable) that a Dell machine might be the way to go.

    So I go to Dell's UK website, only to find that the only Ubuntu option they now offer is a minimum spec netbook - and that I suspect only because Michael Dell threatened to remove their testicles if they didn't offer something.

    I suppose ... if I'd wanted to phone them up, and if I'd been willing to spend the time arguing, I could probably have got my preloaded Ubuntu system. Instead, I thought "sod it" and order an Acer instead.

    I do wonder if Dell are aware of they shenanigans going on at their UK subsidiary sometimes. Operating system evangelism is all very well, but this is costing them sales, you know?

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  17. XP gets returned becasue it's too slow by davecb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In the store where I bought a Aspire, the clerk offered a "refurbished" model with XP for a lower price. I asked him if they were being returned because they were too slow, and he shamefacedly admitted that was the case.

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  18. Re:in your face microsoft! by s4m7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're absolutely right about customers having to seek it out. Heck right there in the article they basically say that when they subtract the people who are returning the netbooks because it isn't windows, then the returns are a non-issue.

    Which is why I think it's such a shame that you go on to invalidate your otherwise perfectly reasonable point by perpetuating a worn-out, well-debunked meme.

    At my local supercenter I wrote down brands and looked them up and was looking at barely 20% "supported", if you call doing a CLI voodoo dance for hours and barely getting half functionality support.

    Since you don't bother to state what kind of devices you're talking about, I'll simply relate my experience. My mother's a 57-year-old computer illiterate. I put ubuntu on a machine for her to try out. Once in a while (maybe twice a year) she has to call me to ask what program she needs to do X. Her multi-function printer: worked out of the box, including scanning. Her ipod: worked out of the box. Her $5.00 keychain digital pictureframe: worked out of the plasticwrap. Her DSLR? works out of the box. Her HD video recorder: works out of the box. I haven't seen one single device touch her computer that failed to function on the first try, without her ever doing any "cli voodoo dance". She never does any research about whether stuff works with linux, she just goes and buys stuff and uses it. And she's getting a nice supply of new coasters from all the worthless driver discs that come with these products, that I've comfortably told her she can just ignore from here on out.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  19. Re:in your face microsoft! by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can tell you why Dell isn't having the return issue, even though it will get me modded down by the zealots. Do you want to know why? It is actually quite simple: It is because Dell has the Linux Netbooks hidden, that's why! Are they on the front page? Nope. Are they on the first page you get when you type "Netbook" on their site? Nope again. And there is a REASON for that, and it is pretty damned smart if you ask me. The reason is that the ONLY way you are gonna get a Linux anything from Dell is if you know about them and go hunting for them. That means the customer A-knows EXACTLY what Linux is, and B- Is willing to go out of their way to get it.

    Heh... As an exercise, I conducted a little experiment. I wanted to see if your claims were at all true...

    First click: A search for "netbook" on dell's main page

    Second click: The netbook product lineup main page

    Third click: "Choose your mini". At which point you're offered a choice between a blue one or a red one (A 10v or a 10) which lists Linux or Windows XP as the OS.

    At which point you're into purchasing. Now... Oddly enough, there was only one choice which was clearly marked "Customize With Ubuntu"- but it's one of the ones you'd really, really want, whether you're doing Ubuntu or XP, unless you're unable to afford the extra $20-50 for the stock config on the price. Seriously.

    As an observation, neither "Linux" nor "Ubuntu" was plugged into looking for this ephemeral "buried" netbook you're claiming- just "netbook".

    Four.
    Clicks.

    And it was the same number if you were looking for a Linux preinstall or an XP one.

    Sorry, you're neither correct nor insightful- and I wish the people that'd modded you up had bothered to do the same little experiment I did and didn't give you the time of day, any more than the discussion threads over at Linux Today gave you an inch on this stuff you're coming up with. Which, I might add, is verbatim what you posted over here.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  20. Re:Dell has dropped most Linux models by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are not looking hard enough. Please check at least the last link.

  21. Re:in your face microsoft! by masshuu · · Score: 4, Funny

    This?
    +----------+
    |  PLEASE  |
    |  DO NOT  |
    | FEED THE |
    |  TROLLS  |
    +----------+
        |  |
        |  |
      .\|.||/..

    --
    O.o