Slashdot Mirror


Asus Plans Dual-Display E-Reader

adeelarshad82 writes "Yet more confirmation has emerged that Asus plans its own e-book reader. An Asus representative in the UK appears to have confirmed this, with the additional details that there may be a value-priced as well as a premium version. The article guesses at the price point for the low-end model — around £100 ($192). Unlike current e-book readers, which take the form of a single flat screen, the Asus device has a hinged spine, like a printed book. This, in theory, enables its owner to read an e-book much like a normal book, using the touchscreen to 'turn' the pages from one screen to the next. Asus showed off a prototype of the device at the CeBIT trade show in March." Reader NeverBotedBush adds, "Asus's e-reader will likely have color touch screens, a speaker, a webcam, and a microphone, along with the capability to make inexpensive Skype calls." The color screen rules out using E Ink technology, so long battery life seems to be unlikely.

199 comments

  1. Nintendo DX of e-books by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's an overstuffed Nintendo DX for reading e-books? Asus Christ.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not a bad idea really. The "classic book collection" on the DS works quite well and could really only do with a bigger and brighter screen.

    2. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by snikulin · · Score: 1

      Well, this one is another good analogy.

    3. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Yes, but The Onion predicted that. They didn't predict a dual display e-book.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Who on earth needs to read books in COLOR? It's part of my job at a research institute to read tons of books and articles. About one in every 50 of the papers or books I read has a colored table or figures. Colored display for books is fairly idiotic.

    5. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This looks like a evolution of the dual-screen Origami laptop concept Asus had on show at CES - http://www.mobilecomputermag.co.uk/200901071186/asus-origami-laptop-concept-has-see-through-screen-and-funky-folding-case.html. A netbook/ebook reader is a more practical take on the technology, but that prototype was much, much cooler.

    6. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      That's purely because it's a lot cheaper to print in black & white. Colour TV didn't take off until lots of people had colour TV's. I agree though most recreational reading will not benefit from colour. But Textbooks, Manuals & anything that requires illustration will find it tremendously helpful.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    7. Re:Nintendo DX of e-books by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Comic books FTW.

  2. Still not going to be Mainstream... by Afforess · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ~$200 may be low-end, but that's still not mainstream. E-books still have a lot of cons they have to get past, and a 200 entry fee isn't helping. As a college student, I would need to be able to resell books, but e-books are "rentals" where I can never sell them, without selling the account. IMO that's the biggest reason E-books are still on the launching pad, many (college) books are bought for $120, but resold for $80, so effectively, I payed for a $40 book. With E-books, it's the same price, but I can't sell them. Once we can buy and sell e-books like used books, I may look into it, but that and the high entry cost basically guarantee that I'll never buy one.

    --
    If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    1. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by sayfawa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would college students who download gigs of mp3s/month have a problem with downloading some "illegal" pdfs? Just search for physics or math on any torrent site and see what you get. I now have digital copies of not only every physics text I've ever owned, I have digital copies of every physics text I've ever heard of.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    2. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll soon figure out that they can only charge 1/3 as much for an ebook, and then everyone will be happy.

    3. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but ad hominem attacks over grammer are pretty pathetic

      Too easy, Brian. Walk away.

    4. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      I now have digital copies of not only every physics text I've ever owned, I have digital copies of every physics text I've ever heard of.

      Digital copies? Your school library probably has laser printers you know >:3

    5. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      What you need isn't going to be marketed as an E-book reader. It's going to be a very lightweight netbook-style device (perhaps a tablet) that allows you to view anything you want.

    6. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Afforess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There aren't as many pdf's for textbooks as you think. Prof's usually require the newest edition of the book, which means that the 13th Edition is no good after one or two semesters. Sure, you can get math books, but the exact math book you're using, with the solutions manual? Good Luck.

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    7. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by langelgjm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I doubt it will be mainstream, but not for the same reasons as you think.

      Strike 1: it's not e-ink/e-paper. So, that makes it what, a dual-screen tablet? Cool, but e-ink is what makes e-readers so great, and so much better for reading, than tablets or laptops or netbooks.

      Now, $200 isn't bad, compared to $299 for the Kindle 2, or more for the DX. So that's a plus. As for the college students and the price of books... I sympathize to a point. I would definitely not purchase standard undergraduate texts in electronic form. They're a ripoff in paper form to begin with, but at least you can resell them (if only for a fraction of what you paid if you were unfortunate enough to buy new).

      As a grad student, though, you'll find your reading habits changing. It's somewhat discipline dependent, but everyone will be reading articles, mostly in PDF format. Kindle DX, etc., are superb for that. I've also purchased two books for a class from Amazon for my Kindle. In both cases, they were cheaper than any used copies I could find. I know I can't resell them, but I don't anticipate selling that sort of book anyway (it was inexpensive to begin with, and I will probably need it for reference when studying for comps).

      In the meantime, I've found at least one book for a class on a torrent site, and I do things like copy all my typed notes to the Kindle. Is it saving me money? Absolutely not. But I don't have to print out hundreds of pages or be stuck at a computer to read things, and that alone is worth it for me.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    8. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by causality · · Score: 1

      See it's my little game to answer ever logical fallacy with another. It keeps the discussion going, while providing a subtle joke for myself. Jokes are always fun.

      He may have been talking about your spelling of "grammar." If so, that's a whoosh.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    9. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if you buy and read a lot of books, but could do so for a fraction of the price. I see paperback type books becoming like $0.99, any my wife reads these style books like they are going out of style.

      Even Textbooks could be sold "new" for much less than they currently are. The fact is, economy doesn't require resale of virtual property. Nobody is demanding resale rights to iTunes music.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and have fun copying a ~600 page book by hand (you can't exactly cut and manually feed in the pages on a library book), especially with most libraries costing tons of money per copy.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    11. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just search for physics or math on any torrent site and see what you get.

      Most likely physics porn or math porn, respectively.

    12. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nobody is demanding resale rights to iTunes music.

      Because in general music is timeless. It gets popular, goes underground, gets revived, becomes retro, etc. A song you heard 15 years ago will still be as good of a song today as it was when you first heard it. On the other hand, textbooks get obsolete. The textbook you read 15 years ago in most subjects will be wrong, not antique, not timeless but simply -wrong-. Secondly, who re-reads textbooks? I listen to some of my old CDs regularly that I bought 10 or more years ago, I re-read some of my old fiction books and some old non-fiction books, however once you get out of college you don't even touch your old textbooks unless by some stroke of fate your going back to school.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    13. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've never known a math professor to require the latest edition, because they often don't count the homework as part of the grade, and the homework they go over is clearly worked out from the bare problems on the board. Many online math classes also include the text as part of the license fee.

      If the texts were written clearly enough to learn from the start then we wouldn't need teachers to explain them. I don't have a need for any instructor who will screw my grade over without regard to my merit just because I didn't shell out for the latest edition of the text. Fuck 'em, they're not as broke as I am.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    14. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by sayfawa · · Score: 4, Funny

      For your viewing pleasure.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    15. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by emjay88 · · Score: 1

      (you can't exactly cut and manually feed in the pages on a library book),

      I'm pretty sure he was implying that the digital copies be printed, not that new digital copies be made by GGP.

      --
      1178161 is prime...
    16. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by lennier · · Score: 1

      "The textbook you read 15 years ago in most subjects will be wrong, not antique, not timeless but simply -wrong-."

      The interesting thing is that if that's the case, the textbook was also -wrong- when it was taught. And yet it was taught as being -right-.

      But truth simply *doesn't* get obsolete. It's either right or it's wrong.

      Doesn't that say something disturbing about science, if what passes for truth changes so often?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    17. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cool, but e-ink is what makes e-readers so great,

      It also makes them slow, expensive, black&white-only and unusable for the Internet or video. A good LCD screen, such as the ones from PixelQi, can give you something very close to the resolution and sunlight readability of ePaper while also giving you color and video and that at a low cost. Now of course if they actually use such an good LCD or just stuck in one of those crappy shiny Laptop screen that are unusable outside remains to be seen.

    18. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen an e-reader screen? Sounds like you haven't.

      Also, an e-reader is a "book". It has nothing to do with Internet or video... etc etc.

    19. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      To compete with printed books effectively, at least in the 'active reader' context, I see a couple things that need to happen before the devices get wide adoption (ie not just the voracious readers with more money than sense):

      * The things need to be cheap, dirt cheap. If they can (essentially) made an embedded system with dual color touchscreens for $200, then they should be able to make a single-display eInk based device for a 4th that that doesn't have all the added gadgetry. (C'mon, dual screens will NOT be a killer feature!)
      * Ebooks will need to be less than half the cost of the printed version. If I'm going to pay for a digital copy, I'm basically paying for the convenience of doing so over going out to buy a book; it might even be an impulse buy. There is something to be said for not having clutter, but at least with most books, you can sell them online (amazon) for a fair bit more than half the new cost (or you only paid $3 for the book to start with because it was already used).
      * The ebooks would need to be unencumbered by DRM. If someone wants a book, it's already pretty trivial to find it online in PDF format. People who want to do that are doing that now. Nothing would change if they removed DRM (or didn't add it) to these devices, except ebook purchasers would be able to back up their own books and control their device (as they can their bookshelves today).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    20. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by karl75771 · · Score: 1

      You should buy a netbook for $250 or so. It does all of this crap plus more. As an added bonus, a netbook displays porn!

    21. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a PixelQi screen? Sounds like you haven't, but hey, that can be helped: Pixel Qi vs Kindle vs Toshiba R600 vs regular LCD tablet.

    22. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not going to be mainstream until the prices of both ebooks and readers are reasonable. That means $1-$2 for most ebooks ($3 max) and all ebooks available in non-DRMed formats, and about $50.00 for ebook readers. AND you must be legally allowed to buy and sell used ebooks! Until all these conditions are met, I won't buy into it at all!

    23. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save some money buy an older PSP and put Bookr on it 5 or 6 hours battery life and honestly not that bad PDFs DJVU TXT RTF PDB I mean whose really going to read for longer than 5 hours at a time anyway.

      Ebook readers should be a hell of a lot cheaper honestly they only need the basics not all the going online and skype nonsense.

    24. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by siloko · · Score: 1

      ~$200 may be low-end, but . . .

      GBP100 != USD200. Not for a few years, currently we're at GBP100 = USD165.020., that's a near 20 per cent difference . . . But price isn't the problem for me it's the fact that reading e-books doesn't offer me anything over reading normal books, except the added stress about carrying around a fragile electronic device rather than a cheap paper back! Techdirt has a nice write up about the lack of any 'social' aspect to the Kindle specifically which may be holding it back, ebook readers are not taking advantage of the growing penchant for mashups, sharing and interacting with our 'media'.

    25. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      I've heard from someone who was there that they have a bookscanner at Harvard that scans from above and only requires you to flip the pages. It's also very fast.

    26. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Only one of those remotely resembled a book, and it rhymed with indle.

    27. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Its not going to be mainstream until the prices of both ebooks and readers
      > are reasonable. That means $1-$2 for most ebooks ($3 max) and all ebooks
      > available in non-DRMed formats, and about $50.00 for ebook readers.

      I completely agree with you. And in regards to pricing of the e-readers
      themselves...it won't improve as long as those idiots try to cram every
      freaking technology into them as if it was necessary. Netcam's...WTF?! Show me
      the book that has a camera inside....or let's you make phone calls. Not even
      the phone book does that! So get rid of all this junk and stick with what's
      needed:

      1. A screen that's easy to read and good resolution for pix
      2. USB port to transfer the texts
      3. Open and standardized e-book format
      4. Totally optional and best reserved for "Deluxe model": wireless and touchpen
            for notes.

    28. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by fbwhrdpmtajg · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the pixel densities will increase dramatically as well. 167ppi is good but 300ppi is the magic number.

      On a side note, I would love to have an e-paper computer monitor even if it was monochrome and 768x1024. Staring at a fluorescent-backlit 98ppi screen all day is straining.

    29. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by josgeluk · · Score: 1

      That may be SFW, but you would have a hard time explaining that.

    30. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      no, it doesn't. it says something good about 'science', in that it's theories that are accepted until a better theory came along. if i had still been learning physics from newton's principia -- now that would have been worrying.

      anyway, in the field i'm in (classical relativistic physics) the "greatest" textbooks are misner, thorne and wheeler (from the 70s), weinberg (from the 70s), hawking and ellis (from the 70s) and in my opinion carroll (from a few years back). the best classical mechanics textbook you'll ever find is landau and lifshitz's (from the 50s or thereabouts).

      on the other hand, in, say, statistical physics the best textbook for a start is perhaps the landau and lifshitz, but if you want anything approaching where the field is today, you'll be hopelessly antiquated. (and some of it is wrong). even staying in gravitational physics, if you get feynman's lectures on gravity you may be fine for the basics but the instant he mentions gravistars, it's simply wrong. the textbook i learned my quantum field theory from was mandl and shaw, and that's now so unbelievably out of date. not *wrong* as much as, well, useless. no-one seriously uses covariant quantisation, and no-one really believes the crappy experimental results that they had to work with. these days you'd use something quite different. (dunno what, though, because i hate quantum field theory.)

      that's the good thing about science -- it evolves. and, as it evolves, previous texts become superceded. simply out-dated at best, and simply wrong at worst.

      apparently the problem is significantly worse in areas of both chemistry and biology, and better in much of maths, but i can't really comment on any of that.

    31. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I have that netbook (the red one in the video), and it doesn't even approach the readibility in sunlight of a Sony Reader I borrowed.

      The epaper screen is only uncomfortable to read in the same conditions a normal paper book is uncomfortable -- i.e. full sunlight at midday. If I'm lying on the couch using my netbook, once the sun moves round I have to close the curtains.

      Also, black and white (maybe with 2 greys) is fine for most of what I do -- most textbooks are mostly b&w, as are most pages in most newspapers.

    32. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      So currently, you buy an $80 textbook and sell it for $50. Cost to you: $30.

      The publishers could price their textbooks at $20 (or whatever), not allow resale, and make an extra $60.

      Alternatively, with appropriate DRM we could have a digital library.

    33. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but ad hominem attacks over grammer are pretty pathetic.

      His range is quite limited (every character he does is basically Frasier), but if you want a slightly stuck-up Bostonian nobody does it better.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Genrou · · Score: 1

      Prof's usually require the newest edition of the book, which means that the 13th Edition is no good after one or two semesters.

      I am not American, and it's been 15 years since I got out of college, so I don't know what happens, and this is a sincere question: what is the problem if you don't study in the last edition of the book? Won't the professor let you inside his/her class? I remember studying things like Physics and Calculus using very old books -- since everything you study on the first 4 semesters is theory stablished hundreds of years ago, a 5 years old book is as good as a new one. The only thing I can see is that some of the exercises will be different, but I really don't see how this can be a real problem.

    35. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I just bought the Sony PRS 505 and it is a brilliant book, even does a pretty good job on PDF if you rotate into landscape mode. Yes the page flipping time is slow and on the 1.7Gb of hardcore physics and Astronomy textbooks I have acquired, that can be an issue seeing as they dont have indexes and the reader cannot goto a specific page. (acquired at no cost, I could never afford £8,500 worth of books in addition to the £500 I spend annually in the local book store on this hobby). If you buy what you read there shouldnt be a problem. As for choice of screen type and device capability I am sure that there are many who have been convinced by the mobile phone companies that the mobile phone should be the universal tool for everything (including enemas presumably) but I cant be the only person in the world who is sick of unwanted duplicated features appearing on every portable device so that their battery life is now limited to fractions of a day. So take your putrid marketing inspired ideas about the ideal device and shove them where the sun dont shine. A dedicated e-book reader will flip 1500 pages between charges. A dedicated mobile phone that just does text and phone calls will sit on standby for a month. A pda, phone, video player, internet terminal, book thing piece of crap will last you half a day on one charge.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    36. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell are these kindle loving monopoly supporting grunts?
      I was arguing last week about how the kindle sucked and some fan
      boy was trying to tell me that it is all I need to start a book collection.
      I have a fucking book collection! It's huge, I just needed something to
      display them. Thanks for coming through again asus!

      Fuck the Kindle, It sucks! It's not what we want.

    37. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by grumbel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have that netbook (the red one in the video), and it doesn't even approach the readibility in sunlight of a Sony Reader I borrowed.

      Sure about that? I don't think PixelQi screens have hit the market yet.

      If I'm lying on the couch using my netbook, once the sun moves round I have to close the curtains.

      That doesn't sound like a PixelQi screen. I have an OLPC which uses a earlier version of the PixelQi technology and that one gets better the more sunlight you have, not worse (you lose color in direct sunlight, but triple your resolution). The only disadvantage the OLPC screen has is that it isn't white like normal paper, but more greyish like recycling paper.

      Also, black and white (maybe with 2 greys) is fine for most of what I do

      Its not good enough for the Internet and when I have the choice between carring an eBook and a Laptop or just a LCD based eBook, i'd take the LCD based eBook any day.

    38. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Wow. It took until late in my undergrad education before I got to subjects that were evolving fast enough that the material in text books might become "changed" in 15 years (FWIW, I hold a B. Sc. Physics and never got much into high energy physics, where most of the changes are occurring).

      I keep my texts on my shelves, and I refer to them. In fact for grad level mechanics, we used Goldstein, and I got a copy of Goldstein from the 50's that my father used. It was remarkably close in content, and merely had some errors fixed and added some problems to the exercises.

      Sometimes it is therapeutic to be working a nonlinear PDE on my whiteboard when some engineering drone walks into my office. They are surprised that a mere marketing person can do that level mathematics.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    39. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by hovercycle · · Score: 0

      Your a fanboy! Look buddy, we're all down with bittorrent here at slashdot. We all ready have huge downloaded folders with books in many formats: .chm .djvu .pdf The kindle is just not the device we want for this task. THE KINDLE IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO MY DIGITAL LIBRARY! and many other people feel the same way.

    40. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by hovercycle · · Score: 0

      You got your ebook reader for free! I bet you wouldn't even buy one with money you had to labor for! This (to a degree) degrades the opinion you preach being as you didn't even take the time to go and buy it yourself. Spoiled brat! Tablets will rule the ebook world. I told you first Goofy and here it is, not more than a week after our argument on the "Ubuntu 9.04 on the Kindle" thread. In your face! Asus came through again!

    41. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by vlm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and have fun copying a ~600 page book by hand (you can't exactly cut and manually feed in the pages on a library book), especially with most libraries costing tons of money per copy.

      That's why you go to the copy shop.

      Based on extensive (legal) book photocopying experience, it is very hard to take more than 6 seconds per page, even including coffee breaks, bathroom breaks, and gossip time. At that rate, its going to take 3600 seconds to photocopy a 600 page book. Which is a mere single hour. To save perhaps $100. Or, in other words $100/hr, which is pretty respectable pay rate for a college student, even for illegal activities. Note that you can make multiple copies for very little extra time, most time is spent flipping pages.

      Consider it a college level arithmetic test...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    42. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      There's some problem with your college. Here at the University of Warsaw the suggested book for the introductory calculus course is 40 years old, and I've never heard of anybody requiring you to buy some book. As long as you can solve the exam problems you're good.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    43. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by effigiate · · Score: 1

      many (college) books are bought for $120, but resold for $80, so effectively, I payed for a $40 book.

      I wish I went to your college. If my books cost $120, I was lucky to get $40 for it. A whole semester's worth of books (usually four or five) would get me less than $150.

    44. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Cool, but e-ink is what makes e-readers so great,

      It also makes them slow, expensive, black&white-only and unusable for the Internet or video. A good LCD screen, such as the ones from PixelQi, can give you something very close to the resolution and sunlight readability of ePaper while also giving you color and video and that at a low cost.

      E-book readers aren't really meant for fast response suitable for video. They're trying to be really good at displaying books, not video. Speed isn't an issue, but power consumption is. An LCD screen (or anything else that requires a constant charge to be readable) no longer meets one of the biggest benefits of e-ink: battery life is tied to page turns, rather than on-time. It's the ability of e-ink to display a picture without drawing constant power that makes it superior to other technologies for this application.

      Personally, I'd rather have a very thin e-ink reader for books with great battery life and a separate, thicker, netbook for the internet with decent battery life, rather than a thicker all-in-one device that does neither task as well. Each has their application, no sense trying to shoehorn additional functionality into a device if it cripples that same device's core functionality.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    45. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Prof's usually require the newest edition of the book, which means that the 13th Edition is no good after one or two semesters.

      That's BS. Not the part about the profs, but about the book being no good. Changes between editions are usually very minor. A few new problems here, some rewording there, some new examples, corrections to mistakes, etc. By the time you get to the 4th or 5th edition, the books are by and large, the same with only a few problems that have changed.

      The old edition is still largely valid. When it isn't the same (and this is pretty obvious, especially if you've got some friends in the same class as you that you're "studying" with), it's trivial to get the physical book from the campus textbook store to compensate, and return it within the grace period. Or, grab it from the library, or even from a friend in the same class.

      It's possible to do this even with used textbooks back in the day. But instead of paying $10 at half.com, it's now $0 at the pirate bay (or wherever).

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    46. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      The book one of my lecturers recommended for introductory QM (Eisberg, Modern Physics) has been out of print for decades, but it is a good book[1] (I happened to find a copy). He did also suggest some more modern books, but that one was the one *his* lecturer had used as an undergrad.

      Come to think of it, the 20+ year old copies of Horowitz and Hill (The Silver Book) floating around have virtually identical *pages* to the modern edition, in the analogue sections, and /Knuth/ is still the ultimate reference on CS.

      [1] well the references to "high speed electronic calculating machines" are moderately amusing, and comments that thing have to be solved manually because they are too complex to do on a machine show their age.

    47. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      Comparing two different (American) calculus texts can be amusing. I found two which had the same subsection numbering, even where the order was completely irrelevant. One was Stewart, Calculus 5e, and I can't remember the other.

    48. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Look, I *am* a University physics professor. I could not care less which book you used, as long as you used one. The new editions usually account to a bit more than reordering the problems so that HW problem 6.11 is now 6.12 and 6.12 becomes 6.9... Get an old book for studying and go to the library and photocopy the problem sets only from the new book. All is then solved and you help crack the publisher's scam.

    49. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A good LCD screen, such as the ones from PixelQi, can give you something very close to the resolution and sunlight readability of ePaper

      Resolution was never a strong point of existing eInk offerings - it's about 150dpi at present, and something like HTC Diamond with its 640x480 2.8" screen offers effectively twice as much.

      One thing that you miss though is that eInk is passive. What this means is that it doesn't shine a powerful lamp right in your face, and that goes a long way towards reducing eye strain from reading.

      (I used to read a lot from my laptop, before I've bought my first eInk reader about 2 years ago, so I've experienced the difference firsthand).

    50. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it is no big deal to go back an edition or two, but you can rarely go back further than that. It also depends on the professor - if they hardly use the book then it's no big deal, but if they reference pages and problems and expect you to do 3/4 of the work outside class it can be difficult. Sometimes the books vary significantly between editions. That makes following along with the prof very difficult, if not impossible.

      For example, if the prof tells you to read up on chapter 5 and do the problems at the end of the chapter to prepare for the next lecture, and chapter 5 of the old edition is all about harmonics, you could spend hours reading and prepping for class only to discover that your prof is talking about newtons, gravity, and force equations, which is what chapter 5 in the new edition covered.

      See the problem? The new editions can have the same basic information, but the structure can vary, and depending on the teaching style this can be a real issue.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    51. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      It's not BS at all, college textbooks often vary significantly between editions, particularly in certain subjects.

      Once you get a good math book nailed down, there isn't much reason to change things up, but English textbooks are constantly changing because, like it or not, the language is constantly changeing.

      I once had to re-take a tech writing class (I -hate- tech writing), and the edition I used for the first class was no longer good for the second class, I tried. They changed professors and editions (same book), and the differences in the text were too great to follow along. I might be able to find a similar section, but I had to hunt for it, and half the examples had changed and a good many of the problems were different.

      Even math books can undergo re-structuring, making using an old edition very difficult. Any field that is constantly changing often has vast differences between editions of the same textbook.

      Frankly, while learning the core of CS may not change, if every course in your CS program uses the same books they did 20 years ago, I'd be concerned that the program is 20 years out of date and you're not getting the best education possible. There are many subjects where the technology and innovation changes on a yearly basis, and not keeping up with it is a shame. It's the kind of education that churns out professors because they can't hack it when it comes to actually applying that CS education to the real world.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    52. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      What about the textbook made in 2000 that says we have never had a non-white male president? That today is wrong but it wasn't wrong when it was printed.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    53. Re:Still not going to be Mainstream... by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      . We all ready have huge downloaded folders with books in many formats: .chm .djvu .pdf

      I have about 20 GB of downloaded books, too, mainly in PDF format (which my DX can read). I have some in CHM and DJVU, too, but not the sort I need to carry around with me separate from my computer.

      I'm not sure how describing why the DX works for me, and my reading habits/situation, makes me a fanboy. I'm not saying it's right for everyone. It probably doesn't make sense for the typical undergraduate college student, given that they have to buy high-priced textbooks that almost everyone resells.

      I talk about the DX because I have one. From what I understand, some Sony Readers can read PDFs; I know the iRex models can, too, and they have other advantages (and disadvantages). But from what I read on /. there is a lot of misinformation regarding e-readers in general, and people who just don't get the point of them, and think that laptops or netbooks are replacements.

      The Kindle/PRS-505/DR-1000 may not be the solution to your digital library; it's not really a "solution" to my digital library either, so much as a way to make my digital library about 100 times more useful than it would be if I didn't have an e-reader.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  3. That's Great, But... by Quothz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    TFA doesn't address the real questions: What formats can it handle? Will it only be able to handle some bizarre custom, DRM-protected format? Will it primarily deal with some bizarre custom, DRM-protected format? Will Asus have remote control to fiddle with my files? Will it gather data about me, what I'm reading, and/or who I'm calling on Skype?

    I refuse to get excited until I know whether it's More of the Same (TM) or not, shiny features be damned.

    1. Re:That's Great, But... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      That's the great thing about vaporware.. some people read it and decide "I'm going to buy one of these as soon as it comes out", some people read it and say "it'll suck, I'll never buy one" and the rest of us read it and say "that's nice".

      Personally, I don't get anything from vaporware announcements except the feeling that one day I might hear about someone who actually has one of these things and they might say it doesn't suck, maybe.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:That's Great, But... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Well said. But in fact:

      Will it primarily deal with some bizarre custom, DRM-protected format?

      That's the one real make-or-break question for me. Secondary formats don't matter much to me if the platform trend is going to be towards more DRM.

    3. Re:That's Great, But... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TFA doesn't address the real questions: who thought of this? I can't wait to pay 50% more for a second screen to my ebook reader so that I can look at both pages surrounding every other page break at the same time.

    4. Re:That's Great, But... by Quothz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TFA doesn't address the real questions: who thought of this? I can't wait to pay 50% more for a second screen to my ebook reader so that I can look at both pages surrounding every other page break at the same time.

      Well, my opinion is still "features be damned". I would gladly pay more for a reader that ensured my privacy and ownership, regardless of whether I'm paying for bloat as well. Mind you, that's not to say your comment is by any means uninsightful. It's just not important to me when compared to the question of what personal concessions I'd have to make before I'm allowed to purchase one.

    5. Re:That's Great, But... by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's called a 'book'.

    6. Re:That's Great, But... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      A second screen could be useful especially if you can turn it off when you don't need it.
      In the context of a book sometime theres a diagram or a map which you might want to reference at the same time as text. Maybe one screen would act as a keyboard/ mouse when needed.

      one complaint about touch screens is obscuring the screen as you interact with it. Mirror the display and you don't have that problem.

      chances are the machine itself will be capable of more than just being an ereader.

    7. Re:That's Great, But... by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't wait to pay 50% more for a second screen to my ebook reader so that I can look at both pages surrounding every other page break at the same time.

      I can't wait for the reduced battery life that comes from having an additional screen, LCD screens, a touchpad, and other things that don't help me read books or PDFs more easily!

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    8. Re:That's Great, But... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, my opinion is still "features be damned". I would gladly pay more for a reader that ensured my privacy and ownership, regardless of whether I'm paying for bloat as well.

      Any existing reader without network connectivity options (preferably not even hardware) will do that. For example, Sony Reader.

  4. Awesome, I think? by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

    I keep reading the post over and over, trying to figure out how they hide the words "...includes the words "Don't Panic" written in large letters on the back."

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Awesome, I think? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      err the front, oh my karma

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Awesome, I think? by Quothz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I keep reading the post over and over, trying to figure out how they hide the words "...includes the words "Don't Panic" written in large letters on the back."

      Obligatory link.

  5. Backlit screen = yuk by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Backlit screens are useless outdoors. In my recent quest to replace an aging mp3 player, I found everything has color screens now, which suck because a) they're hard to read outdoors and b) they burn power, so you have to push a button to turn them on. E-ink seems fine, but I also think there is a large, unjustified bias against good old black & white LCD - yeah, like a Casio digital watch, or a PDA from 1999 - but so what? Those screens were/are very useful.

    1. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by speedtux · · Score: 1

      There are several kinds of color LCD screens that work outdoors. Nokia cell phones commonly use one kind, the OLPC uses another kind.

    2. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Troll

      I guess you've never used an iPod Touch or an iPhone then, huh? Outside, under full sun - clearly visible, unless of course the glass itself is reflecting the sun directly into your eyes - which happens with many surfaces.

    3. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      How often do you read outdoors? Usually when I'm outdoors, I'm doing things like recalibrating my retinae, watching my skin burn, etc. No time to read outdoors, really.

    4. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Azureflare · · Score: 3, Informative

      It won't be a problem if they use a screen from pixelqi: http://www.pixelqi.com/

    5. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by causality · · Score: 1

      clearly visible, unless of course the glass itself is reflecting the sun directly into your eyes - which happens with many surfaces.

      Such as glass?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    6. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He has a point. The press release doesn't mention what technology the reader uses. Pixel QI is supposed to be coming out with a type of LCD fab based (so it's as cheep), color, sunlight readable display, but hasn't mentioned any partners yet. Maybe Asus is working with them?

    7. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by srothroc · · Score: 1

      I agree. It looks like they're making more of a multipurpose reader that's able to browse the internet, though.

      I do like the idea of e-ink screens, especially in terms of battery life; I'd really like it if someone made an e-ink reader WITH a backlight that you could optionally turn on for reading in the dark.

    8. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      but I also think there is a large, unjustified bias against good old black & white LCD

      Colors are good for many things. For one, any modern video is going to look like crap on a black and white LCD. For another most people see black and white LCDs as cheap, most people play their MP3 players in their car, at home, at work all indoors. And you can find a large amount of black and white LCD players if you get cheaper off brand ones. Sure, they won't be the greatest quality, but most customers don't want black and white LCDs because they are inferior.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative

      Daylight from windows can make reading screens difficult while indoors.

    10. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Spit · · Score: 1

      Damn straight, reading on my old palm pilot works great in full sun.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    11. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Windows? I took all of those out when I changed my house and to Linux.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    12. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by lennier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, my Palm III was just wonderful for reading e-books. Ran for a whole weekend on four rechargeable AAAs, too.

      Still got it in a drawer somewhere. The main pain is that it needs things converted to .pdb and can only take about four average novels (text-only, .5MB each). No Google Books scans.

      But yes, why not revive the old b&w LCD?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    13. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony PRS700 has this - but it sucks because if you use it your battery runs out in a couple of days (as opposed to my normal couple of weeks).

      I got a normal, bendy clip on booklight and it works a treat.

    14. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      They still draw power constantly to display an image. This means they've only solved half of the problem (outdoor readability), and it's the half that's less important for e-books. E-ink is used because it draws no power while displaying a static image, which is >90% of the time while reading a book.

      The Pixel Qi display is better for netbooks, where video is actually needed and removing the backlight is a sufficient power reduction.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    15. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by nidarus · · Score: 1

      How often do you read outdoors? Usually when I'm outdoors, I'm doing things like recalibrating my retinae, watching my skin burn, etc. No time to read outdoors, really.

      But, being a cyborg, why would you even need a separate e-book reader?

    16. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by grumbel · · Score: 1

      They still draw power constantly to display an image.

      Sure, but PixelQi stuff is quite conservative on the power, a OLPC last around 12 hours if you disable WiFi and with a better battery that could likely be extended a good bit, which should be enough for a book or two. In addition display speed isn't just needed for video, its also needed for browsing books. The 1sec refresh time works well enough if you just read linearly, but if you want to quickly flip a few pages forward or backward it totally kills the experience.

    17. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Even being conservative with power, an LCD still draws power on static images, while e-ink does not. This means that while an OLPC (with a 2W power goal) might last 12 hours on a 24Wh battery, a Kindle will last 12 days worth of reading at a standard pace with the same size battery. I've heard Kindle users getting 40 hours or reading time (no wi-fi) on a tiny battery (Agai, for the application (lots of static images, several seconds apart) e-ink will almost always be better.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    18. Re:Backlit screen = yuk by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I do like the idea of e-ink screens, especially in terms of battery life; I'd really like it if someone made an e-ink reader WITH a backlight that you could optionally turn on for reading in the dark.

      .

      Aren't most e-ink screens opaque?

  6. Yes But... by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

  7. sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 1

    I am tired of all those eInk readers (I've owned a couple); their slow refresh time makes them awful.

    1. Re:sign me up by CarpetShark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point of e-Ink is that it doesn't need to refresh multiple times per second to keep the text on there. It works more like paper, and so refresh time isn't really important. What's the refresh time on your paperback, when you turn a page?

    2. Re:sign me up by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instant. I can the text on the page as I'm turing it. If someone is interrupting me and I have to re-read the last paragraph on the last page because I forgot it, I can do that really fast on real book.

      With eInk, you have to put up with the switching delay.

      I know they're getting better, but it is an issue right now.

      I think a big part of the problem is that the full screen has to turn one color then the other to prevent ghosting. That effectively doubles refresh time and that "flash" makes it much more noticeable than if, like the LCD I'm typing on right now, it only switched the pixels that changed.

      eInk works great once you have the page displayed, especially if you have a large screen. Wouldn't something iPhone sized (or a little bigger) with an eInk screen be pretty great? Imagine the batter life! But all the page refreshes would make it rather annoying to use.

      If we could get something with a refresh rate akin to an old passive matrix LCD, we'd be in good shape. What was that, 50ms or so?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:sign me up by Azureflare · · Score: 1

      What's the point of eInk if they are able to use a screen that looks pretty much the same, with color?

      An eInk interface is still pretty expensive to make (compared to standard LCD), and it's really hard to create a usable interface (uuggghhh scroll wheel)

    4. Re:sign me up by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

      E ink doesn't give you the strain on your eyes that normal LCDs do. Us geeks might be relatively unaffected by it because of how often we use them. But after a while your eyes hurt. E-ink doesn't have to refresh as often so it reads a lot more like paper.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 1

      It works more like paper,

      No, it doesn't. I can quickly flip through a paper book; flipping through an eInk book is like watching grss grow.

      What's the refresh time on your paperback, when you turn a page?

      Milliseconds.

    6. Re:sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LCDs don't give people eye strain anymore than books or eInk displays.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asthenopia

      If anything, due to their lower contrast, eInk displays are worse than LCDs in terms of eye strain.

      eInk is superior to LCDs only in terms of power consumption. In terms of readability in sunlight, it's comparable to LCDs designed for outdoor use. And in terms of contrast ratio, color, and refresh rate, it's much worse than other display technologies.

    7. Re:sign me up by mewyn · · Score: 1

      Unless you've got books that have indestructible pages, I bet you're page flips take about half a second to do, which is exactly comparable to the Kindle 2's page flip.

    8. Re:sign me up by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Strange. I can flip through a 1000 page book in a couple of seconds. Something doesn't quite add up properly...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    9. Re:sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LCDs don't give people eye strain anymore than books or eInk displays.

      YES, They do!

    10. Re:sign me up by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You can't actually read the text on the page -as- you are turning it, because there's a small amount of time that the page is too vertical to read either side of it. So it's not 'instant'.

      Granted, e-ink might still be longer than this time, but read pages are not 'instant'.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    11. Re:sign me up by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      What's the point of eInk if they are able to use a screen that looks pretty much the same, with color?

      Er, the battery lasts a week between charges? And will always last 5-10 times as long as any other technology, however much batteries are improved?

    12. Re:sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bollocks. You should read your own link since it does not help your comment in any way:

      On a computer, a CRT with a low refresh rate (less than 70 Hz) can cause similar problems because of the flickering image. Aging CRTs also often go slightly out of focus, and this can also cause eye strain. LCDs do not go out of focus and are less susceptible to visible flicker.

      I've owned a Cybook Gen 3 for about a year now and I can tell you that the strain on the eyes are much much less with e-Ink regardless of the contrast. It's the non-flickering display (NO FLICKER AT ALL) compare that with LCD that updates every 6-12ms - unless you mean LCD displays like these https://ssl.bulix.org/projects/lcd4linux/attachment/wiki/Crystalfontz/CFA-634.jpg which can't be compared to a consumer computer LCD screen. The only time that refresh rate has any meaning on e-Ink is when you turn the page and then only if you use optimised refresh (it fills the screen with black to prevent ghosting but it's optional on the Cybook).
      I can read hours on end on my Cybook - I can't do that on a LCD.

    13. Re:sign me up by value_added · · Score: 1

      LCDs don't give people eye strain anymore than books or eInk displays ... If anything, due to their lower contrast, eInk displays are worse than LCDs in terms of eye strain.

      You're asserting that eInk displays are the same as LCDs? And what evidence do you have to back that up?

      Oh, look a Wiki link. Let's see what it says ...

      On a computer, a CRT with a low refresh rate (less than 70 Hz) can cause similar problems because of the flickering image. Aging CRTs also often go slightly out of focus, and this can also cause eye strain. LCDs do not go out of focus and are less susceptible to visible flicker.

      Putting aside the fact that CRT have more problems for the user than just flicker, and that 85Hz (on a CRT) is a more reasonable standard for the absence of "perceived" flicker, I don't see much, if anything, in that quote (or the rest of the short article) that says anything about eInk displays.

      I'd suggest that if you really believe that LCDs and eInk displays are the same, you'll have to better than offer up an unrelated Wiki article to validate your opinion. As for opinions, have you considered the possibility that just about every buyer of an Amazon kindle would disagree with you?

    14. Re:sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 1

      I don't see much, if anything, in that quote (or the rest of the short article) that says anything about eInk displays.

      The article says (correctly) that "eye strain" is the result of blurriness and flicker. CRTs have those, LCDs and eInk displays don't. Hence there is no plausible mechanism by which LCDs could cause more eye strain than eInk.

      If you want to claim LCDs cause eye strain, either put up or shut up.

      I'd suggest that if you really believe that LCDs and eInk displays are the same

      They are not the same: eInk displays are low contrast and slow refresh; in short, they are pretty lousy displays. However, like LCDs, they don't cause eye strain (at least no more than reading paper).

    15. Re:sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 1

      Yes, eInk displays don't flicker. But neither do modern LCDs, not because their refresh rate is fast (which it happens to be), but because the image doesn't fade between refreshes. If you think your LCD flickers, you're imagining things.

      http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/monitors/display/lcd-parameters_3.html

      Of course, you may be getting eye strain from your LCD monitor for other reasons, but that has nothing to do with LCD technology.

    16. Re:sign me up by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If anything, due to their lower contrast, eInk displays are worse than LCDs in terms of eye strain.

      Higher contrast causes less eye strain? I doubt it. I routinely lower the contrast of my text displays on LCD, because the high contrast is so painful. If high contrast is so great, try looking at the sun right next to the blackness of space. Not very comfortable, is it?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:sign me up by maxume · · Score: 1

      If we are going to parse and mince, we should keep in mind that approximately half the time, going back 1 page in a physical book simply involves glancing a bit to the left.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    18. Re:sign me up by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Unless your name is Johnny 5, you aren't reading each page. A Kindle could flip from the first to the last page in the same amount of time as any other page flip, assuming you don't care about reading what's in between (which seems to be the case in your analogy).

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    19. Re:sign me up by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      So, an equivalent average total speed would only require the e-ink to refresh twice as fast as your average page turn. Seems reasonable to me.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    20. Re:sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A week?

      My little PRS-505 goes about 4-6 weeks between charges... and that's with about an hour of reading per day (sometimes longer).

    21. Re:sign me up by smallfries · · Score: 1

      The original question wasn't about reading the pages, it was about how quickly the view can be updated. While I can't read that quickly it is not uncommon to flip through pages looking for one that you recognise. As memory works well with visual layout, often you can spot the page that you want by the shape of graphs, paragraphs, equations etc...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    22. Re:sign me up by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      To which, I feel, a full-book keyword search could perform better in many circumstances.

      An e-book reader doesn't have to be better in every quality, just enough to justify its cost to each person. Depending on the type of reading you do, your habits, how many books you read, etc an e-book reader could be well suited for you, or it might be significantly more/less than you need/want. That just means there's still a market for both books and e-books.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    23. Re:sign me up by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Very true. The point of the original reply to mewyn was to point out that there is a refresh speed difference. So browsing does have its limitations compared to books - where-as search is obviously much faster. One nice thing about the Asus design is that it improves browsing. Even if the screens refresh at the same speed they let you see twice as much in one go.

      For my own reading habits (novels and technical papers) I can't really see refresh speed being that much of a problem. The only reason that I've held back so far from buying an ebook reader is that I want dual screens to make reading papers more bearable.... I'll have to wait and see reviews but I may buy one of the new Asus models if they do a decent job.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    24. Re:sign me up by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      LCDs don't give people eye strain anymore than books or eInk displays

      Your link doesn't say that. It merely says that LCDs don't have one particular cause of that problem that CRTs do.

      In any case, consider this. LCD backlight is nothing but a fairly strong lamp shining directly into your face. Do you seriously think this does nothing for eye strain? Not to mention the contrast between bright display and darker ambient light (which is there even in the day) - yes, it does hurt as well.

      It is also well-known that minimizing eye strain while reading, even from paper, requires certain fairly specific lighting conditions. Sufficient diffused lighting in natural spectrum is ideal (i.e. reading in daylight, without glares). Good luck getting that with an LCD.

    25. Re:sign me up by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The article says (correctly) that "eye strain" is the result of blurriness and flicker.

      It doesn't do that. It says:

      "On a computer, a CRT with a low refresh rate (less than 70 Hz) can cause similar problems because of the flickering image. Aging CRTs also often go slightly out of focus, and this can also cause eye strain. "

      Nowhere does it say that those are the only two causes of eye fatigue. In fact, it also says:

      "Symptoms often occur after reading, computer work, or other activities that involve tedious visual tasks."

      "When concentrating on a visually intense task, such as continuously focusing on a book ..."

      Last I checked, paper books don't flicker, nor are they blurry. But reading them can still cause eye strain; just less so than with a computer screen.

      FYI, high contrast greatly increases eye strain.

    26. Re:sign me up by speedtux · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, paper books don't flicker, nor are they blurry. But reading them can still cause eye strain; just less so than with a computer screen.

      Reading anything can cause eye strain if you do it long enough. The question here is whether eInk displays are any better in that regard than LCDs.

      People who claim that have provided not a shred of evidence. LCDs are as good or better in all areas that matter to eye strain: flicker, contrast, sharpness.

      FYI, high contrast greatly increases eye strain

      Very high contrast does (due to glare), but not the kind of contrast you get with LCD screens (if it did, people would reduce the contrast).

      eInk contrast, however, is lower contrast even than regular printed paper, and that makes characters harder to see and may lead to eye strain.

    27. Re:sign me up by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Flipping through books is a bug. It's usually done when you want to find your last place (which is better implemented with bookmarks), find some place (which is better implemented with indices/tocs/hyperlinks/search), or get a summary (which is better implemented with an actual summary).

  8. O RLY by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    and the rest of us read it and say "that's nice".

    You say that like "the rest of you" is more than you and your virtual cat.

  9. Color screen rules out E-ink? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then can you explain this?

    And that's not even mentioning color electronic ink from other companies.

    1. Re:Color screen rules out E-ink? What? by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can.

      Ordinary e-Ink + additional technology.

    2. Re:Color screen rules out E-ink? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heres your explanation...

      http://pcs.co.uk/2009/05/color-e-ink-years-away/

      From TFA:
       

      Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is telling everyone that we won't be seeing color e-books as the norm for quite some time, he even went as far as to say these devices are "multiple years" away. He also said "I've seen the color displays in the laboratory, and I can assure you they're not ready for prime time."

    3. Re:Color screen rules out E-ink? What? by LionMage · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, they are also talking about including a webcam in the device and including Skype so it can make video calls. While color e-ink might be feasible, the refresh rate isn't going to be sufficiently high enough for video playback or conferencing needs.

  10. Dual Screens = Opportunity by BBCWatcher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not make one screen E Ink and the other more conventional color (LED-backlit, TFT)? If you want the long battery life and don't care about color at a particular time, keep the color display powered off. Otherwise, if there's an illustration or photo that you want to see in color, drag/swipe the picture/page over to the color display and spend some battery juice. Bonus points if the entire color display is simply a snap-on accessory that you don't have to buy and don't have to carry everywhere.

    1. Re:Dual Screens = Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not make one screen E Ink and the other more conventional color (LED-backlit, TFT)?

      Because no one will buy an ebook reader with mismatched displays.

    2. Re:Dual Screens = Opportunity by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not use colour e-ink displays? Surely they've got the kinks ironed out by now...

    3. Re:Dual Screens = Opportunity by pavon · · Score: 1

      The other major disadvantage to an e-ink display is refresh rate. If you had a normal display, you could have web-browsing and other interactive features on the second display, and use the e-ink display for low power, static display. It would really increase the usefulness of the system. Think an ebook that flipped open/over to become an N800.

    4. Re:Dual Screens = Opportunity by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I think the very first color e-ink model is hitting the market only now, and its colors are very limited so far. I'm eagerly waiting for the day I can read comics on an E-Reader.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  11. Feature Creep by chill · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It isn't an ebook reader if it has a microphone, webcam and the ability to make Skype calls. It is a flat computer.

    I can see the justification for speakers, possibly helping with ADA compliance and reading text to the sight impaired. The rest is loss-of-focus, lets add features to disguise the shitty battery life, crap.

    Give me extended battery life in an ebook reader over all that crap any day.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Feature Creep by MrMista_B · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, it isn't a computer if it has a microphone, webcam, color screen, and the ability to connect to a global network. :)

      You forget that as technology advances, so must our names for things.

      That, and it sounds like, well, you wouldn't want the product - however, I, and I think many millions more, /do/, just as it is.

    2. Re:Feature Creep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that as technology advances, so must our names for things.

      Sorry, I'm not buying your angle. I don't think it's safe to assume technology will always "advance" to a point where words reserved for a particular specialization apply to general purpose devices. Lets not forget the reason we used those words in the first place. This could replace ebook readers, just as cell phones have almost replaced wrist watches, but calling it an ebook reader or a cellphone a watch is intellectually lazy.

    3. Re:Feature Creep by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Your analogy fails because a (general purpose) computer has never traditionally been defined by the peripherals that are attached to it. However, purpose-built devices like e-book readers, digital cameras, calculators, and music players are defined by the primary interface they present to the user.

      Could you call a calculator a computer? Sure -- and many of them today are as programmable as a general purpose computer of a decade ago. That doesn't change the fact that the typical calculator has a form factor that suggests "calculator" to those that see it, and has its affordances laid out in a pattern that facilitates the easy manipulation of arithmetic expressions.

      The same argument could be made for digital cameras, cell phones, your iPod or Zune or Zen or whatever, and so on. Each of those devices has a form that suggests its function (to a greater or lesser degree, highly dependent on the skill of the engineers). Of course there are convergence devices which, with rare exception, are never as good as a well-engineered single-purpose device.

      So when the GP talks about how this device is not really an e-book reader, he's right. It has too many other convergence features to be credible as an e-book reader, while at the same time lacking the one feature most e-book readers have that makes them worthwhile -- the e-ink display. Indeed, the Skype feature precludes the use of e-ink! The list of features is ambitious; the last time I saw a convergence device with that much ambition behind it, it was one of Sony's Magic Cap devices. (If I were to compare Magic Cap to a modern device, I'd say the closest equivalent would be a smart phone, which itself is a category that seems to successfully merge the features of a PDA and traditional cellphone.)

      Yeah, the price is "right" for a lot of folks, so many will buy this. Whether it will satisfy those who need a reliable e-book reader that can hold a charge for more than a day -- hell, for more than a few hours -- is another question. I would argue that the typical use case for an e-book reader will not be satisfied by this device.

      Regardless... my laptop can display e-books, but I wouldn't call it an e-book reader. Reading e-books is just one thing I can do with it -- my laptop is a general-purpose computer. And this device from Asus is a multifunction device that has one innovation (two portrait screens hinged together) and a bunch of extra things tacked on; it can display e-books, but it's certainly not engineered to do so optimally. So what do you do when the technology platform is sub-par? Throw in a bunch of other crap to try and sell the device. It might be marketed as an e-book reader, but I'm with the GP -- it just doesn't meet my criteria.

  12. So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A touch screen (finger-print analysis)
    A camera (visual surveillance)
    A microphone (audio surveillance)
    Skype calls (call tapping)
    A speaker (subliminal suggestion?)

    Does it come with a free copy of of George Orwell's "1984"?
    Oh, right...thats been yanked already.

    But seriously, this combination of tech in a fucking BOOK reader? Call me Tinfoil Tom, but doesn't this make any of you just a wee bit nervous?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by opposabledumbs · · Score: 1

      I think that's just the result of Asus trying to mess with the underlying design of the eee as little as possible. Besides, it helps to inflate the unit price a little, and attempts to widen the customer pool slightly. On a side note, 1984 isn't the problem with these features, although your argument is valid my tin hat is glowing as I type this. The problem isn't surveillance as much as failure to read and think 'cos I'm playing some stupid internet penguin game/talking to my inane mates/ listening to muckracker and the drooling vegetables on Last.Fm It's not Orwell, but Huxley we have to worry about here: Brave New World here we come.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight... by drizek · · Score: 3, Informative

      The touchscreen can't be used for fingerprint analysis.

    3. Re:So let me get this straight... by Draek · · Score: 1

      That's what they want you to *think*.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    4. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      15 seconds and Google. You might want to try it some time.

      http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800424319_499495_NT_3378d9fd.HTM

    5. Re:So let me get this straight... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      A microphone (audio surveillance)
      Skype calls (call tapping)

      Isn't that a little redundant?

    6. Re:So let me get this straight... by drizek · · Score: 2, Informative

      15 seconds of trying to make sense of an article I can't read without a subscription:

      This is a tablet PC with a built in fingerprint reader AND a touchscreen.

      Next time spend 30 seconds before making a snarky comment. Also, try reading the fucking article you link to.

    7. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Wait...How did you read the article without a subscription(I didn't need one)? Don't tell me you subscribed just to TRY and prove me wrong.

      As far the technology discussed in the article, did it occur to you that the information about the screen itself, combined with the sensor tech would do exactly what I stated? A little imagination, please.

      Ok, lets try again, same Google search keywords. (touchscreen fingerprint analysis)

      The fucking patent work for you, dude?

      As a matter of discussion, this patent fits my original post TO A TEE. Screen, camera and microphone, all combined to provide damn near perfect biometric acquisition.

      http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080267456

      Sheesh.

    8. Re:So let me get this straight... by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      >>Call me Tinfoil Tom, but doesn't this make any of you just a wee bit nervous?

      Maybe a little, but how about this for an idea guys.

      I picture a book sized device...

      ...doesn't have touch screen
      ...doesn't have dual screens
      ...doesn't have a camera
      ...doesn't have a microphone
      ...doesn't connect to the internet and make skype calls
      ...doesn't have speakers

      but it does let you read books!!

      If they can make this thing for $200, just think how cheap the simple device I described would be!

      We could call it an "Electronic Book". We're gonna be rich!!

    9. Re:So let me get this straight... by drizek · · Score: 1

      I used the google, I found a picture of the device you listed, and I noticed that it had a separate fingerprint reader.

      Show me a touchscreen that is capable of accurately reading your fingerprint. They don't exist, plain and simple, and even if they did, the last place you will find one is on some crappy $200 ebook reader.

    10. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll try again...

      http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080267456

      Please try and READ the text. I'm sorry, but it doesn't include pictures.

      This isn't World of Warcraft, dude, so don't pull this "Screenshot, or it didn't happen." shit.

      And by the way, this patent was applied for by Honeywell, a legitimate company that is known for biometrics work. If they applied for a patent, it is more then likely because they want to make some money from it. It is pretty hard to make money from non-existent technology, unless, of course, you are Nathan Myhrvold.

    11. Re:So let me get this straight... by drizek · · Score: 1

      Sweet jesus, are you illiterate?

      First of all, NO there are no devices shipping with this capability.

      Second, did you read your link? Again? This is a patent for a BUTTON with a built in fingerprint reader.

      IT IS NOT ON THE TOUCHSCREEN.

      Let me quote it:

      There may be a device 15 such as a sensor, camera, imager or scanner situated or embedded behind each displayed key 14 for obtaining fingerprint information from the finger pressing the respective key.

    12. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      FIRST line in the abstract:

      "A data collection system having a touch screen and sensors behind the touch screen for obtaining biometric data about the user. While the user is making entries on the touch screen, one or more fingerprints of the user may be taken."

      You can go now.

    13. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Look, I'm not trying make you look like a fool or anything like that.

      I just linked you documentation that proves this technology is in the realm of "already doin' it" (the link below, Honeywell's patent).

      Touchscreen that has the ability to take fingerprints, microphone that is used to do voice-print capture, camera to do iris-print capture, but the only thing that I couldn't figure out was the speaker. It has since occurred to me that with existing technology, the speaker could be used to produce echo-locative, 3-dimensional mapping of the surrounding area, either in conjunction with the microphone, or by using the speaker membrane itself as the sensor. Using very high frequency sound, it would all but undetectable to the human ear (ever listen to bats flying around when they are hunting insects? You can just barely hear them, not at all if your inner is ear is old enough). With proper programming, it could even do so beyond the range and angle that the camera is limited to.

      Now, why, you might ask, would anyone put all this technology in a fucking eBook? Neither you or I know how much this tech costs, so it might actually be a rather cheap way of replacing billions and billions of dollars of OTHER technologies that are designed to do the same thing.

      There was just recently an article here on /. that discussed the complete, remote hacking of Skype, but you didn't mention that. You've focused on one single aspect of my original post, that by itself doesn't make sense. But when you put them altogether, along with the link to Honeywell's patent on most of this technology, don't you think it is POSSIBLE?

    14. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anachragnome · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How is it this is moron modded informative while I'm modded flamebait when he is quite WRONG?

      The patent on the the technology: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080267456

      Or did I get modded flamebait because somebody got their feelings hurt?

      Stupid, useless mod system.

  13. Pure speculation: PixelQi screens? by marciot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm hoping these will come out with PixelQi screens, as it will make it a truly revolutionary product. Although at this point it is pure speculation, I think there is a good chance Asus has signed a deal with PixelQi. Not only do the videos on PixelQi's sites show netbooks which resembles the Eee, their site mentions the displays will be in production in the late 2009, which coincides with the introduction of this new e-Reader. PixelQi could stand to benefit from teaming up with a company such as Asus, and I bet this is what has happened (in a couple month's we'll see how well my prediction fares!)

  14. Color screen? by JVert · · Score: 1

    Really? An ebook with a color screen just sounds soo useless. Color does not mean black and white, when reading long enough on a computer you start to see the rgb bleeding through off the white. I can't belive Asus is soo far off target with this.

    1. Re:Color screen? by slim · · Score: 1

      Really? An ebook with a color screen just sounds soo useless.

      You don't buy books with colour illustrations? All sorts of things benefit from colour, whether it's a cookery book, or an illustrated novel (look up Arthur Rackham's 1915 illustrations for A Christmas Carol).

      I'd be very tempted by a device that used colour e-ink. By preference it would have a "true" black like traditional CMYK printing.

      Before that though - cheaper B&W e-readers please.

  15. speaking of OLPC, this looks like the XO-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OLPC's XO-2 concept was similar to this - a dual panel color touch screen readable outdoors (like the XO-1's single panel non-touch screen). I don't know if they're going forward with the XO-2, but the XO-1.5 is nearing it's unveiling.

  16. Does it look like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reader NeverBotedBush adds, "Asus's e-reader will likely have color touch screens, a speaker, a webcam, and a microphone, along with the capability to make inexpensive Skype calls." The color screen rules out using E Ink technology, so long battery life seems to be unlikely.

    So it must look something like this.

  17. Two screens for a book reader...? by Kira-Baka · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make much sense to me. Bound books use both sides of the paper because the other side would be blank otherwise... Two screens on a device like this is pretty pointless.

    1. Re:Two screens for a book reader...? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Some books are designed so that text refers to an illustration that is on the other page in the 2 page spread. Continually having to flip pages is annoying.

    2. Re:Two screens for a book reader...? by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Half as much page turning.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    3. Re:Two screens for a book reader...? by knarfling · · Score: 1

      It could be really, really great if the screens could be both tied together (reading page1 and page 2 of the same book) or independent (reading page 1 of one book and page 43 of the same book or page 1 of a different book).

      Think of the possibilities. In a textbook example, a problem refers you to a definition, illustration, or answer found in the appendix, or in a different chapter. Instead of setting a bookmark, scrolling to the appropriate section and then jumping back, you have one screen set to the area you are reading and the other to the appendix or other page and you simply look from one page to the other.

      Another example might be when a class assigns multiple books. You could have two books up a the same time, referring to both without having to close one and load the other.

      After homework is done, I want to get back to my light reading and use both screens for the same book. I get to see twice as much text at the same time, reducing the amount of page turning/scrolling to get to the next paragraph. I don't know about you, but I find the small screens and the small amount of text that can be displayed on an ebook reader one of the problems that is just hard to ignore. YMMV.

      --
      Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
    4. Re:Two screens for a book reader...? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I find page turning more seamless than with a real book. You just hit the button as you complete reading the last 3 or 4 words on a page and presto, the next page is there just in time for your eye to move onto the next word. And there's a lot less chance of flipping two stuck pages then having to find your place again.

  18. ebook reader tipping point by paiute · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm walking into the Stop and Shop the other day, and I look over at a beat up car, the kind in which you typically see some old duffer checking his scratch tickets and reading the Herald. Only this old guy was checking his scratch tickets and reading his Kindle. I thought, Perhaps this moment is time zero.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:ebook reader tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation from .uk to .us:
      s/Stop and Shop/convenience store/
      s/duffer/man/
      s/scratch tickets/lottery tickets/
      s/Herald/newspaper/
      I'll leave associating "time zero" with the "tipping point" analogy as an exercise for the reader. ;)

    2. Re:ebook reader tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, I didn't assume he was from the UK. Stop & Shop is a US grocery chain (at least in parts of New England), scratcher tickets are sold in most US convenience stores and many grocery stores, and there are US newspapers with "Herald" in their names. The use of "duffer" is rare in the US, but hey, it's slashdot - weird vocabulary is the norm here.

      - T

  19. Display-Only Tablet by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What we need is a tablet that has a superfast, hirez display, superfast wireless networking, and nearly nothing else. A wireless display peripheral at 1920x1080 (or, better yet, WQUXGA at 3840x1200) with a full color, high frame rate layer and a super low power B&W e-ink layer. A minimal CPU for running an X server's application and Linux - or some smaller "remote display" network OS and application. A 2-channel stereo soundchip. And a 600Mbps (DVI 552Mbps + 48Mbps data) that's 3x the speed of 802.11n.

    The audio/video data delivered to it (and from it, as videophone, for a "deluxe" bidirectional media terminal) would be delivered by local feeds for home and conference use, or over really fast broadband. But the unit itself should be just a display (and recording) terminal, with app processing hosted at a stationary host.

    So we've probably got at least 5 years before we get one of these. The display and networking bandwidth are higher than even the fastest desktop machines, with a few pioneering exceptions. By that time it should cost under $300. Until then, the rest are just prototypes.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Display-Only Tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is a tablet that has a superfast, hirez display, superfast wireless networking, and nearly nothing else.

      Yeah, and if you can make it run without battery, you can use it to generate some extra power a la perpetuum mobile.

    2. Re:Display-Only Tablet by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Huh? Absurd requirements (if you want the display to be fast, don't use e-ink, that negates the purpose). What you describe is basically called... a TV.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    3. Re:Display-Only Tablet by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's absurd only if you ignore the fact that the display I described has e-ink for only a "super low power B&W e-ink layer", and is mainly a "full color, high frame rate layer". The e-ink layer is only use in "e-reader" modes, which can be much lower power.

      As for a "TV", try using your TV to read a PDF. On a train. Without a graphics chip, or a network to get the data.

      The point is that we need not separate "netbooks" and "e-readers", but a single tablet that is just a display, renderer and wireless network node. But I guess until we get one in about 5 years, the future to you will just seem "absurd".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Display-Only Tablet by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And if I can make it run without a display or WiFi, it will be perfect to surf the Psychic Friends Network.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  20. (sigh) still waiting.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Sure, color is neat but I'm still holding out for an a4 or letter-sized document reader with a photon-reflective, as opposed to a photon-emissive display... oh and it has to handle PDF's.

    AFAIK, the closest anyone's come so far is a 10.4" diagonal screen, which is still about 30% too small.

    1. Re:(sigh) still waiting.... by slim · · Score: 1

      This seems like a strange requirement. Novels and technical books are usually quite a lot smaller than A4.

    2. Re:(sigh) still waiting.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I would want it primarily for holding material I like to have regular access to for reference, mostly things such as research papers and academic textbooks. In my experience, most of the latter have pages that are very nearly letter-sized, and as for research papers, I've never encountered any that were not formatted either for letter or A4.

    3. Re:(sigh) still waiting.... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      But the whole point of eInk is to eliminate strain on your eyes for prolonged reading. If all you need is reference, open the docs on your 21" LCD or laptop, which you no doubt have with you since access to documents is important to whatever work you're doing.

      I can't imagine the paranoia of carrying a glass screen that size in a backpack of bag. You'd probably need a hard protective case, at which point you might as well get a tabled, which would also give you editing capabilities.

    4. Re:(sigh) still waiting.... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Actually, while the 16:9 displays are all the rage, they're the wrong format for technical papers. the old 4:3 is almost perfect for letter-2" (or A4-5cm for the euro crowd). If you will grant that most papers have a 1" margin, and a screen does not need one (notes may be pop-up style, or overlayed if you need to scan for them), then an 11.1" screen in a 1.4:1 format is very close to what you're looking for. The bezel can form your "missing" border. Thin as possible would be nice, but I admit I'd love a slide out keyboard like my HTC touch pro, or maybe even something closer to "normal".

      Make it auto-sync with a computer and give it a couple of weeks of battery life and it'd be worth a solid $500 for me. I've got (easily) 10,000+ pages of building codes, technical manuals, and product literature I'd love to have in the field. Not to mention syncing all of my library of building drawings - even if I have to pan and zoom - would be killer to take to a job site. I take it back...it would probably be worth closer to $800-$1000 for me.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:(sigh) still waiting.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, reflective technology is also usable under a wider range of ambient light conditions... LCD monitors are not.

  21. skype: most used feature? by DEmmons · · Score: 1

    it is on my ASUS eeePC 701. Wife got it for me while my primary notebook was in the shop and i was compiling C code on it and everything while i was in notebook withdrawal, but now all we ever use it for is Skype video calls, even though it still runs Fedora and has lots of software. I wonder how often that becomes the main use of gadgets like this after the excitement dies down.

    1. Re:skype: most used feature? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      My EeePC 701 is still my primary computer, you insensitive clod, and yes, it runs Skype too...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:skype: most used feature? by hughk · · Score: 1

      So-called netbooks are very popular now as portable machines. They weigh next to nothing and they are dirt cheap, in case the DHS take it away (i.e., you can have a spare) or it gets stolen. Students love them for note taking.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  22. Too $much, too late by UttBuggly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a life-long reader; I love reading a book or newspaper as much as anything in life. I was very ill as a child and spent most of ages 4-6 in bed. We didn't own a TV, so my only companions were books from the local library and the daily papers. (That was back when you got a morning AND an evening paper on your doorstep.) When I could get out, I bought all the comic books my allowance would allow. That was when an Action Comics Superman from DC was a whopping 10 cents. I was highly pissed when the price went to 12 cents an issue, as I recall.

    One of the gadgets I've wanted for years is a decent e-reader with lots of content. I passed on the Sony and Kindle machines because they were "close, but no cigar" for my taste. Color was a requirement for me as I still love comics and graphic novels.

    Recently, I got an iPhone 3GS and discovered Stanza, Comics (Comixology), NYTimes, and NPR News. I had assumed the small screen on the phone would be terrible for reading. Instead, I find that I read something with ALL of those apps, everyday. Just finished reading ALL of the Edgar Rice Burroughs Mars novels with Stanza. Absolutely loved them. Coincidentally, the Science Fiction Book Club (of which I've been a member since 1972) is offering a reissue of those same books in hardcover.

    Cost from SFBC = $50, plus shipping. Cost of the ebook versions on Stanza = $0. Also recently read the entire Conan Doyle Sherlock Holmes books and stories, again for a cost of $0.

    The Comics app, even bereft of titles from DC and Marvel (so far), is excellent. I'm currently reading Omega Chase and loving it. I've spent about $10 on various comics thus far and haven't regretted a single penny.

    The point is, I'm no longer "waiting" for an e-reader; I have all I need.

    One could argue that I own a +$2000 e-reader in the iPhone, but since it IS a nice phone, game machine (finally getting good at F.A.S.T.), web and e-mail appliance, AND a decent e-reader, I am still happy. Plus, I only have to carry and manage ONE device.

    Bottom line: Sony, Amazon, Asus, etc. will never see a nickel from me for their readers. They missed any opportunity with me.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
    1. Re:Too $much, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Bottom line: Sony, Amazon, Asus, etc. will never see a nickel from me for their readers. They missed any opportunity with me.

      What did they do to you?

    2. Re:Too $much, too late by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

      >>Bottom line: Sony, Amazon, Asus, etc. will never see a nickel from me for their readers. They missed any opportunity with me.

      What did they do to you?

      Wow...a perfect example of "Johnny can't read" in your AC post.

      The implied point, if you had actually read my entire post, was that device convergence has rendered the purchase of a dedicated e-reader moot, at least for me.

      I prefer Sony televisions... I own 2 currently...shop Amazon frequently (Amazon Prime rocks!), and build Asus barebones PCs for family and friends all the time. They are fine vendors and manufacturers. NO issues with any of them. But, in the SPECIFIC case of e-readers, I'm no longer a potential customer.

      --
      I am my own gestalt.
    3. Re:Too $much, too late by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not so sure the AC missed your point. Your sentence about not spending a nickel on a reader conveyed a certain anger or hostility, which the AC was picking up on.

      And what we can pick up on in your response is a certain arrogance that you read a lot of books. Well, good for you. But all that reading didn't seem to help you in understanding someone's response to you or at least rereading it to try to understand before responding.

      I'd agree with the AC: I don't know why you're faulting Sony and Amazon for anything. It took a lot of money and time just to develop a black and white screen. So it isn't there in time for you to read comics on. So what. Future generations will have that ability. And displays that use very little power will definitely find lots of applications in an era where energy conservation will be come more important. That goes beyond readers, to advertisements, road signs, etc.

  23. Flipping pages by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Probably the nicest feature of a book is the ability to bend it and flip pages by running it against your thumb, then sticking a forefinger in to hold the place. Once an Ebook reader can do that, I'll be impressed.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Flipping pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you drive a car with a buggy whip?

    2. Re:Flipping pages by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Probably the nicest feature of a book is the ability to bend it

      I prefer hardcover books myself.

    3. Re:Flipping pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the nicest feature of a book is the ability to bend it

      Working on it.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6bkmPjVF-k

      and flip pages by running it against your thumb, then sticking a forefinger in to hold the place. Once an Ebook reader can do that, I'll be impressed.

      I'm pretty sure those are already covered. The Kindle's page turning buttons are already placed correctly for the first, and a document should already open to the page you were on last when you open it.

  24. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked out the Kindle and took a pass. The cost of entry is too high just so I can purchase/rent books. Other than the cost I really didn't like knowing Amazon zapped content off people's Kindles. Shouldn't be legal to do such a thing. Then I researched more and found out that Amazon collects all sorts of usage data from those who purchase their product and there is no means to opt out of this privacy invasion. Then I noticed that if I wanted blogs that are free on the web delivered to the Kindle I would have to pony up a buck or two per month per blog for content that is more limited than the free web version. Not really a selling point.

    So, I read about these competing devices with what may or may not be technological improvements, but their library is very limited and none of them seem to be saying they won't have the same draw backs as Amazon's product such as the ability to remotely remove content or massively invade privacy as if they are entitled to whatever info they please simply because I purchased their hardware.

    For now I am sticking with stuff printed on dead trees and downloaded from torrent sites on my laptop. When a more compelling alternative comes about I will use that, but I don't see anything on the horizon.

  25. Dual-screen Asus Origami prototype by Adlopa · · Score: 3, Informative
  26. Another vote for the 3Qi by davide+marney · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ask anyone who has used an OLPC, and they will tell you that not only is it possible to use an LCD in full, direct sunlight, the image quality actually improves; the stronger the light, the better. The OLPC's limitation, however, is that daylight-readable version is monochrome only.

    The 3Qi is the commercialized next generation of the same screen technology. It adds EPaper, color, and video to the line up. Mary Lou Jepsen, the engineering genius behind the company, is trying to get the power requirements down far enough to allow 20-40 hours of run time, using current battery technology. The current version of the 3Qi is apparently not able to achieve that kind of power management without changes to the motherboard, but is still able to reduce power requirements by 20%.

    Engadget did a series of side-by-side video comparisons with the Kindle earlier this year, and the results are very impressive.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
  27. What's wrong with that? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see a tablet device with a touch screen about the size of a hardback book's pages with wi-fi, bluetooth, a DVD/CD burner, sound chip, and Linux, with plugs for a keyboard, monitor, earphones/speakers, and ethernet. For a hundred bucks.

    That's actually the computer of my dreams. Why hasn't anybody put one on the market yet?

    1. Re:What's wrong with that? by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      The UMID mBook m1 has a lot of what you're looking for. It's clamshell, not tablet; there's no DVD/CD burner, but there's USB ports to connect one; and it's smaller than you asked for. Last I looked they were running a bit over $600, which is still kind of steep for something I'm likely to accidentally step on or leave somewhere.

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
  28. Don't want by swillden · · Score: 1

    I like e-books and e-book readers, but one thing I definitely wouldn't want is dual screens. One of the biggest advantages of reading an electronic book with a nice handheld device vs a paper book is that it's compact and a single, non-hinged piece. It doesn't take two hands to hold it and it doesn't flop around.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  29. This could be great, but..... by Niubi · · Score: 1

    It's great how fast ebook technology is coming along. Can't be doing with the Kindle sinces it's too interlinked with amazon (and that's before you even consider the DRM). I'm hoping that if Asus get round to manufacturing this, they'll be 'open'. As in - once I put a book (or some other kind of document) on it, it'll stay put and not lock me out after a set period of time. If they do that, I'm heading straight to DubLi to buy one. So here's hoping you're listening, Asus!

  30. Re:You can still only read one page at a time... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    I don't see this as a big seller. The advantage of the tablet format is that it's compact. I'd opt for a bigger, more dense (DPI) and better contrast screen over a two page device. I guess it would be kinda useful in being able to browse for stuff (scanning two pages at once), but other than that it doesn't seem to out-weigh the fact that you have to have this thing opened like a book.

  31. A new market, an old cash. by Howkent · · Score: 1

    Amazon, Sony and some small company use the D-Ink to built their e-book reader. Asus join the battle. Newspaper and magazine will die, the new material replace the old ones. e-PDF To Word Converter http://www.111download.com/product/e-pdf-to-word-converter.html