Slashdot Mirror


New iPod Touch Has an 802.11n Chip

eggboard writes "iFixIt has discovered a Broadcom 802.11a/b/g/n chip in the just-announced iPod touch (32 GB and 64 GB) models that uses single-stream 802.11n. Single-stream doesn't get the full power of N, but it boosts speed enough that — along with space-time block encoding, a feature coming soon to Wi-Fi access points with two or more radios — the iPod touch could be an effective networked media server, for streaming and transfer, possibly through the new iTunes Home Sharing feature."

24 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Awesome! by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wireless! More space than a Nomad! I finally have a reason to get an iPod!

  2. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by alen · · Score: 3, Funny

    now that the spec is final, Apple will write a driver and make sure to enable n only via their WiFi access points

  3. iLinkIt by the_other_chewey · · Score: 5, Informative

    WTF is this link-less entry supposed to be?

    Here's the story mentioned above:
    http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPod-touch-3rd-Generation/1158/2

  4. Not how Home Sharing works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Home sharing is just a way of automatically keeping multiple iTunes libraries up to date with new purchases when they are all tied to the same iTunes store account. It's not any kind of actual sharing service, just a synchronization service.

    1. Re:Not how Home Sharing works by radmarshallb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes it is. Home Sharing has an option to allow you to automatically synchronize new purchases, but it does much more than that. You can copy any song from your iTunes library to any other machine on your Home Sharing network. For instance, I just copied a single album (ripped from my own CDs, not an iTMS purchase) from my main library upstairs onto my laptop. If an iPod were enabled for Home Sharing, it would make sense that you could do the same thing. That is, wirelessly sync whatever songs, albums, or playlists you choose to your iPod Touch.

  5. Silly by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is silly. There would be so many other bottlenecks on a mobile device of this nature that the speed of the connectivity isn't an issue. I bet the iPod can't even consume (let alone serve) data at 802.11g speeds.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Silly by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's vastly easier to shovel bytes than to do something intelligent with them. Serving the files to another device is well within the capabilities of the iPhone. I have a DT Research DT168 with a 500 MHz Geode chip, and hooking up a 1TB MyBook to it via USB2 gives me real-world transfer rates of about 7MB/sec to assorted clients (all of which are more than powerful enough to receive the data much faster) over good old 100Mbps ethernet. I'm positive the iPhone or iPod Touch is capable of saturating 802.11g if its storage can handle it; and why not?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      802.11n is 2x the range. 91m vs 45m.

  6. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by NoYob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why didn't they tell us earlier? Seems odd to me.

    It's part of their marketing. Now, when fanboys say that Apple products are NOT more expensive when you compare them feature to feature with others, the fanboys can also point out that you're also buying features that you don't know about! See how superior Apple products are?!

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  7. All this means by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this means is that Apple decided to use a chip that happened to support wireless 802.11N communication. Maybe it was a planned feature, but it got cut. Maybe it was just cheaper or easier to work with than other offerings. Apple will not enable this at some point down the road, just as they won't activate the bluetooth chip inside older Ipod Touches. What _will_ happen is next year, they will sell a new model with the same chips, but this time with the necessary software support and bill it as a new compelling feature.

    1. Re:All this means by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Informative

      just as they won't activate the bluetooth chip inside older Ipod Touches.

      Er, they did...

      If you pay Apple 10 bucks for the 3.0 OS upgrade, that unused bluetooth chip in the second-gen iPod Touch will spring into action...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  8. 802.11N hardware OTHER than the chip? by anethema · · Score: 3, Informative

    What I'm more curious about is any of the hardware there for it. Multiple antennas for MIMO? Any 5GHz hardware? The biggest advantage to wireless-N IMO is it moves the wireless out of the stupidly crowded 2.4GHz ISM band. The 5GHz band is (at least for now) far less crowded and this unlicensed band has quite a few more channels to spread the devices out a bit more spectrum wise.

    The chip is one thing but without any other supporting hardware, it doesn't make much difference. The chip could have been chosen for better power characteristics or a few other reasons. Time will tell if apple enables any N style features but I am not holding my breath.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  9. Re:Server? by ZackSchil · · Score: 5, Informative

    iPods output to televisions.

  10. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by RedK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the iPod Touch doesn't support 802.11n networking, only b and g. What purpose would it serve to say "Hey, the device is 802.11n capable, but the software won't let you use it". They probably used that particular chip for cost reasons. The chip is perfectly capable of doing b and g and probably costs less in volumes than the b/g only chips now that technology has gone forward.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  11. Re:Server? by RedK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No because you don't need a dock, just a cable.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  12. Re:Server? by RedK · · Score: 4, Informative

    HDMI is only one way to connect to a TV. How bout you try to get informed before spouting nonsense : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1454.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  13. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    They aren't allowed to rewrite the drivers. Sawbones-Oxleaf act or something.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's possible they may sell another $5 upgrade for N as they did when N first came out, for the macbooks that shipped juuust before N was announced on them.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  15. Not surprising by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is not surprising, and now that it's confirmed, we can expect Apple to release an 802.11n enabler for iPod touch in the future and charge $.9.95 for it. They're so predictable these days...

    What's more interesting than this is that the new iPod touch, while almost identicial to the old one aside from a faster processor and some other things, is almost the exact same inside except for one small change: a space big enough to fit the same camera found on the iPod nano (in previous generations there was an antenna cable socket, which has been moved and, in its absence is now just plastic spacer).

    There were rumors of an iPod touch camera before it came out, even rumors that pinpointed the camera to this exact location in the device, and there was also a recent rumor that they pulled it due to some problems at the last minute. Looks like this confirms that, and I'm sure we can expect an updated iPod touch in the future with a camera. That, in my opinion, is far more interesting.

    --
    R.Mo
  16. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe because this chip really does not support N?

    Just because it is from that family of chips doesn't mean it has N.

    Look at the designator on the end of the chipset full designation: BCM4329FKUBG That BG at the end may be telling.

    I'm sure when Apple calls, Broadcom pays attention, and will burn custom chip sets, omitting any feature Apple does not want.

    the full BCM4329FKUBG designation does not appear in Broadcom's catalog. Its a custom chip.

    Besides, N requires special antennas. They were not found.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  17. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And for $10 it will enable the camera.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  18. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if it's a coincidence that the near-last digits are FKU....

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  19. Re:Why didn't they tell us? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 5, Funny

    FKUBG... hmmm. Fuck You Bill Gates?