T-Mobile Backs Off Plan To Charge $1.50 For Paper Bills
netbuzz writes "Following a torrent of customer complaints, bad publicity and the threat of a class-action lawsuit, T-Mobile has abandoned a plan announced this summer to charge any customer wanting a paper bill $1.50 per month. While the news is being cheered by many T-Mobile customers, it's not going to be as popular with others who praised the extra fee as an environmentally sound inducement to reduce paper use."
They could do just the opposite and give people a $1.50 reduction in their bill if they opt-in to a paperless billing system.
I personally like paper bills... It helps me keep track of when I've PAID those bills...
I doubt that they would have gotten the same reaction if they had offered a $1.50 discount to customers agreeing to receive electronic bills.
When I read things like this I often wonder if the people promoting these environmentally friendly business processes are actually not that environmentally friendly and instead simply motivated by greed. The problem I see is that average (you know, 100 IQ etc.) people are too stupid to realize the business hippy just wants more of their money, and have discovered that using politically correct buzzwords has a calming and mesmerizing effect on the cattle...
"Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
While I understand the environmental argument, paper bills make for accountability. With online-only billing, you have no way to resolve certain account disputes, because they hold all the data! I'm not putting on my tinfoil hat and saying they'll deliberately screw up the records and double bill you - but mistakes do happen. Having a paper trail is the best way to protect yourself from mistakes. Also, consider this: what happens to your account when you close it? How can you prove that you had the account once it's closed if it's online-only? With a paper trail, you can prove it! (This applies more to banks than cell phones...)
Give a "$1.50 a month Discount" to all customers asking to not have a paper bill sent.
This goes over very well if you give a discount instead of trying to boost your profit margin.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Companies always pass it off as being "green", but that's not the real reason. T-mobile stores are still overly-lit, selling merchandise that's over-packaged, and handing out paper fliers.
The truth is that its expensive to print bills. And I don't blame them for wanting to get rid of them, but if you're going to save money, then pass a little of it on to me.
My bank just paid me $5 to go to e-bills and for me, that was enough.
Carrot vs. Stick
Why not allow customers to download or get emailed a digitally signed pdf copy of the statement or bill.
I hate that. But only because they get it wrong. O2 do that with the iphone accounts and you cannot get them to change it. I used my iphone for business and have to save the bills so I left them. I wouldn't have a problem if they simply gave you the option to receive the bills as pdf's via email, so the amount of work I have to save them is to just push a button. That would then be preferable to paper bills, however, forcing you to login and navigate their website and download them and if you forget one month do more work is just too much trouble to stay with the provider, so I left them for a provider which did provide paper bills.
Why can't they just get it right? It's not rocket science.
I never understood the "save a tree" crap.
They farm trees for paper, the same way they farm wheat for bread.
If I don't eat a slice of bread no one commends me for saving a stalk of wheat.
Yeah, I know there are other things that are environmental problems besides growing the trees, but it was "saving the trees" that was the root cause of this "don't use paper" admonition.
Environmentalism causes a lot of superstitious behaviour.
The exact reason I get paper bills. I deduct for home business, I need records. Plus, when you go paperless you have to go to their site and manually download the bill. It would be a different story if they emailed a secure PDF to you.
We're not talking about the rights of the company. We are talking about the rights of the account holder.
If you don't have a paper bill, it may be in some cases difficult to assert any rights you have concerning mistakes in the bill.
Are you really denying that people are not able to submit their electronic bills as evidence in cases. You are sorely mistaken is your are claiming that. Electronic records are just as, if not more, vital than purely paper records. E-discovery laws have been added to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, I have shown you the sections of the FRE - but perhaps you would feel better if we all argued in incorrect 'truisms'.