Slashdot Mirror


Student Designs Cardboard Computer Case

SpaceGhost writes "The Houston Chronicle has a story on a Grad student at the University of Houston who has designed a cardboard case for a computer. This is not a new concept, but this one is meant to be used in manufacture. The idea is that it will be faster and easier to produce (no fasteners for example) and dramatically easier to recycle."

72 of 329 comments (clear)

  1. Seems like a cool idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But its probably not recyclable after it catches on fire from my overclocked processor

    1. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by carolfromoz · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..after it catches on fire ..

      Still cool?

    2. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the lack of Faraday cage-like effect a traditional metal case provides.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, the ashes from this case will make an excellent soil supplement for your garden... pity about the rest of your house, however.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could probably glue a thin sheet of aluminum foil to the inside of the case, so I wouldn't worry about the Faraday cage.

      At least now the ultra-low-end Dells will look on the outside just as crappy as they are on the inside :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could probably glue a thin sheet of aluminum foil to the inside of the case, so I wouldn't worry about the Faraday cage.

      So now my cardboard computer case needs a tinfoil hat?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by suso · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I read on the cover of a book once that paper ignites at 451 F.

    7. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by Urkki · · Score: 3, Informative

      But its probably not recyclable after it catches on fire from my overclocked processor

      No worries. I think the melting point of solder is lower than ignition point of cardboard. So there's an automatic safety mechanism: solder melts, electric connections break, heating stops.

    8. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by coolsnowmen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not mine, Enough of mine is made out of plastic for it to be completely worthless. But even if it wasn't, Depending on the frequencies you are trying to shield, your current computer case is a pretty horrible fariday shield as it is. Every hole, slit and opening for ventilation or other purposes allows EM to radiate or re-radiate out of it at a wavelengths of that size.

    9. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by bemymonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bhahahah, I can't wait until the first people start showing up in tech support forums complaining about mold...

    10. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by theelectron · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you are saying that electronics don't start fires? You forget about sparks that can fly off the circuit boards and components that can fail and burn before the leads do. Also, liquid solder will still keep an electronic connection. Cardboard just sounds like a dangerous idea without some kind of fire retardant in the cardboard, which generally makes it unrecyclable.

    11. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Proper building is important, e.g. in most cases you will find there are metal blanks behind the plastic blanks on drive bays, theese make up part of the shielding but are often not replaced (or even can't be replaced) when moving drives arround (PC manufacturers don't really care about this, they only care about meeting the interference regulations when the machine leaves the factory).

      Remember even a 10GHz (that would about the third harmonic of the clock of a 3GHz CPU) electromagnetic wave has a wavelength of a few centimeters so small slits aren't that much of a problem.

      They don't build PC cases out of metal (or occasionally metal lined plastic) for fun or to make them cheap, they do it because they need the shielding to meet interference regulations.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by KharmaWidow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      LOL - I try not to shamelessly promoto myself

      http://pizzaboxart.blogspot.com/

    13. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you were joking, but I doubt your processor (or any component in your computer case for that matter) would run hot enough to ignite paper/cardboard.
      In normal operation no, under fault conditions some chips could probablly reach those kind of temperatures.

      http://www.metacafe.com/watch/26293/cpu_cooler_removed/

      >AMD athlon 1400
      >Temperature 370C/698F
      >Application crashes
      >CPU and board up in smoke

      If a CPU lacking the thermal protection built into modern CPUs can do it with mere heatsink removal then I'm pretty certain the power stuff on the board could more than do it under the right fault conditions.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Seems like a cool idea... by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just make the dang thing out of ALUMINUM to begin with and "sidestep the middleman".

      Do you work for Apple? :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. *sniff sniff* by EkriirkE · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's that burning smell?

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:*sniff sniff* by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Formerly Pentium 4, now known as Tetrapentium Oxide.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  3. What happens by maroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I spray coke over it like I normally do when reading Slashdot?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:What happens by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're not fooling us for a second - that's not coke and you're not reading slashdot.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:What happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My God. I hope he's not reading slashdot.

    3. Re:What happens by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 5, Funny
      I love that this comment is coming from someone calling himself "oldspewey"...

      Pot ... Kettle ... etc. ...

    4. Re:What happens by DittoBox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't there something about goats, yoda dolls and grits for this?

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    5. Re:What happens by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love that this comment is coming from someone calling himself "oldspewey"...

      Pot ... Kettle ... etc. ...

      I'm pretty sure you mean:

      Pot ... Kettle ... Sticky ....

  4. Better description and pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/recompute-a-closer-look-at-the-sustainable-cardboard-pc/ for a better description and better pictures

    1. Re:Better description and pictures by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Informative
      Personally I think he's slightly off but cardboard does generally have to reach a high temperature to burn. 258c, I think converts to nearly 500f. I think he's a bit too high as I've always known it to be 450 for cardboard to burn.

      Unless your computer catches on fire it will never get hot enough for cardboard to burn. They put oven meals in cardboard, people reheat pizza in its box in the oven and cooking food in a oven is much hotter than a PC.

      From this link: http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/feedback.cfm?next=10&topic=Thermodynamics&start=1#Science%20project%20boiling%20water%20in%20cardboard%20box

      Paper must reach the temperature of 451 F (233 C) to burn. But the water in the box is less than 212 F (100 C) and any heat added to the paper will be absorbed into the water by conduction. The paper and water will be at the same temperature. In fact, any material you use that readily conducts heat will stay at about the temperature of the water.

      Once all the water has turned to steam, the cardboard or paper will burn.

  5. grounding? by virmaior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is grounding no longer a problem? I haven't built a computer in a while, but I'm not sure if cardboard makes a good ground.

    1. Re:grounding? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Grounding has always been via the power supply primarily, the power supply always has a ground plug for that reason. The case was just a handy secondary ground when working on the computers. I imagine that lame grounding strap will be more important for this case, but really grounding isn't a big risk unless you are in a very dry area and producing a large static buildup in your body.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:grounding? by wsanders · · Score: 2, Informative

      What needs to be grounded? There are ground return paths in all component connections, and that is desirable over having random ground currents circulate in the case.

      Having debugged a few interference problems on PCs myself, as far as RFI is concerned, radiation is primarily from external cables. The main problems with PCs are 1) Reradiation from the external power, peripheral, and network cables, 2) Pickup of stray radiation on cables inside the case itself.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    3. Re:grounding? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost all of them do. In fact I am unaware of any case that doesn't.

      devices(CD-Rom. hard dirve, etc) use their case for grounding, and you attach metal screws to old them onto the case, and most likely have other contact. You do not want to start having different 'ground points' in a case. That will casue drift and multiple different potentials.

      This is why you should leave the computer plugged IN, but turned off at the power supply when working on them, also maintain contact with them usually via a strap.

      That said, the risk of damage in normal conditions is real, but low.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  6. the case is the easy part by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Informative

    The case is either Al or steel sheet metal, easily recyclable. The toxic sludge and heavy metals in the PCB, capacitors and solder are the problem. Call me when they invent cardboard solder.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:the case is the easy part by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I wonder how much extra ewaste is right now going into dumps because of that crap. Did the environmentalists even bother to see how bad the extra failure rate is for that stuff before forcing it down everyone's throats? Because I have seen a good 400-500% increase in dead electronics due to solder failure.

      IMHO they should have demanded recycling plants for the solder we had, not force an inferior solder down everyone's throats. from talking to my engineer buds they are seeing the same thing as I am-lots of stuff that should be working but failed from the new solder giving out. I think 20 years from now we'll look back on the solder switch as another really bad idea pushed through under 'saving the planet". Whether we'll actually get a functional solder is anyone's guess, as all those failing devices means you have to buy NEW devices, which is of course planned obsolescence at its finest. IMHO the problem was NOT the solder, it was sending the stuff for "recycling" to the third world where it became an eco-disaster. It should have been recycled here and the materials then reused. That would have made more sense and helped the environment more than some faulty new solder that still gets dumped in the third world or ends up in a landfill.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:the case is the easy part by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The case is either Al or steel sheet metal, easily recyclable. The toxic sludge and heavy metals in the PCB, capacitors and solder are the problem. Call me when they invent cardboard solder.

      Bingo. And what about the energy and resources involved in producing the internal components? Apparently these are very high (e.g. in terms of water, etc.)

      I don't want to sound too much like I'm attacking an idea which may well have been intended as no more than an interesting concept (albeit one that's been done and reported on Slashdot on at least one previous occasion). Still, it smacks of those feelgood/sounds-good prominent but tokenistic green efforts that are all too commonly the focus of bandwagon-jumping PR-oriented greenery.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:the case is the easy part by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wasn't environmentalists who pushed it; it was companies who saw the financial benefit of doing so.

      If you could release a technology which would receive wide support for being "green" but degraded faster than the traditional parts, would you do it? Sure you would - because you could just blame the increased failure rate on the wackos. "Green" and "ecologically responsible" stuff is popular. Just like the current "green" fuels for vehicles (E85, here's looking at you), they don't work out in fact or practice, but they do result in good advertising.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:the case is the easy part by russotto · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wasn't environmentalists who pushed it; it was companies who saw the financial benefit of doing so.

      Right. The RoHS is just a figment of our imagination; electronics companies actually decided to use crappier, more expensive solder in order to promote planned obsolescence.

      Seriously, we've been hit twice in the solder department. First it was water-based fluxes (the problem wasn't the flux, but the flux remover, which had some truly nasty compounds in it). For quite a while they didn't work so well causing insufficient wetting of the components resulting in failure of the solder joint. Once that was ironed out, then the RoHS with the lead-free solder requirement came in. This time the solder goes on fine, only to later develop "whiskers" which short out the devices.

  7. Silverfish by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bet the case will be all eaten in a year or so.

  8. Re:Could they have included by carolfromoz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't make me imagine what you might be imagining >

  9. EMC Nightmere by distilate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not again.

    This is not the first time we have seen this idea

    cardboard does not act as a Farady cage and the computer will leak large amounts of radio frequency interference so will not be legal in most countries.

    1. Re:EMC Nightmere by shaitand · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you haven't opened one. There aren't many plastic cases around. There are aluminum cases with plastic molding on the outside.

    2. Re:EMC Nightmere by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While you are at it, just a remarkably smaller volume and mass for the aluminum of the outside of the case.

      This has got to be one of the DUMBEST "self-nuke" ideas to come along here in a long time.

      Take a tower PC that's likely going to be mostly encased in metal to begin with.
      Take that very trivially recyclable component and then go out of your way to
      REPLACE it with something that is probably going to cause more harm to the
      environment when you try to recycle it.

      Replacing plastic with paper is not the answer.

      This is not the grocery store.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:EMC Nightmere by sexconker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I really don't get this bullshit.
      People keep talking about plastic cases.

      I have never seen a computer case without fucking metal.

      I have seen designs for such, though.
      I can only imagine the amount of fail.

  10. Re: by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call me when they invent cardboard solder.

    They did. It's called "Duct Tape"

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  11. I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used very early AT cases all the way into the socket 7 era - I even built an ultra rare P-II era system into an early AT case once. Then, when I went to ATX I kept reusing cases. Hurricane Ex Wife stealing everything followed by Hurricane Ike put a stop to that reuse chain, but I do intend to start reusing cases again.

    The biggest "need" for a cardboard case comes from big name manufacturers that insist on making proprietary boards and cases instead of sticking with industry standards. I understand why, you don't want people gutting an HP, putting an ECS main board in it and reselling it as an HP at a flea market, but I'm sure there's other ways to deal with that particular issue.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by British · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I remember playing Tribes 2 on my AMD system many moons ago. It kept locking up about 12 minutes in due to overheating. Finally switched over to an AMD-approved case, and the overheating problems went away. While it would have been nice to keep an old case & keep putting better systems inside, I had no choice on that one.

      I don't miss the old AT cases where to access anything inside meant having to unbolt the side-top-side u-shaped cover. The switch to individual removable sides was a good one.

    2. Re:I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't want the damned things because the bastards are knuckle busters. you ever have to work in one of those damned HP or Emachines "minicases"? By the end of the day your knuckles are gonna look like you have been punching a brick wall. And i hope you don't want to add anything weird like....ohh I don't know...a second HARD DRIVE!

      Being a PC builder with 15 years in the biz i can tell you there are plenty of those little bastard Emachine, HP, and Dell cases that the ONLY way to keep those bastards from overheating with a second drive, due to the microscopic drive cages that are so damned tiny two hard drives have to practically be taped together to fit, is to use what my former boss called 'white trash cooling". That is where you take and leave off the side of the case and park a $10 Walmart box fan right against the sucker to blow air into the little PITA.

      So you want to know why they use them and we don't? It is because the cheap bastards can save a few cents on metal and since they know EXACTLY which parts they are gonna use they design it for that and ONLY that. Even then they use some seriously fucked up designs to squeeze shit into these little suckers, like the Compaq Deskpro SFF I'm typing this on where the PSU is a fricking triangle! yeah, good luck getting a replacement for THAT sucker. At the same time we PC builders actually want to use standards and have choices in our components. It may not allow us to make little cute "baby" towers, but we can actually use whatever parts we desire without having to buy our cooling for the household aisle at Wally World.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I miss the power button actually turning the system OFF.

      I also miss my old cases I could reuse as a jack stand for my car. Of course I understand why the AT standard had to be replaced.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are plenty of computers out there which don't adhere to those standards. Something like the Dell gx270, for instance, which uses an odd ATX-wire-compatible cigar shaped power supply. Vendors seem to love making proprietary, difficult to service cases: seems like every generation of each vendors' products results in a different, difficult to service case design (including different-headed screws).

      BTX is a bad design. It's not Athlon 64 or i7 compatible. ATX is. That's part of the reason hobbyists aren't interested. The fact that BTX power supplies and boards aren't as good, inexpensive, or available also has a lot to do with it - it's not the hobbyists who have nixed BTX, it's the producers. Hobbyists will move to whatever works well for the application, at a good price range.

      Mini-ITX (which is what I assume you were referring to) does have a fairly broad hobbyist adoption. Why? It isn't a bad case design which limits adoption in multiple applications.

      What are the applications for which ATX does not work well? And/or why do they not work well? What about the design sucks? "Clipping it to your belt" isn't exactly a valid (or honest) criticism. There's mini-ATX, as well as a variety of spec diversions - and from what I've seen, they're upwards- and cross- compatible (ie mini-ATX will work in a full-size ATX case). That works well for everything from "small desktop" on up through full-size low-end server.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:I've been recycling computer cases for YEARS. by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not all cases are created equal. My favourite old case was a desktop case with a pair of buttons to open the case up like a hood. More recently, I worked as a computer tech in a school where the sides of the AT cases came off independently.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  12. I ordered one... by coolmoose25 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and the cardboard box came in metal shipping crate.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  13. The case is least important by bcmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As others have pointed out, the case is not difficult to recycle or toxic.

    And who the hell throws away a case? It's the part that goes obsolete slowest, and several computers might occupy a case before it needs to be replaced.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:The case is least important by tick_and_bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The people most likely to throw away a case are those who don't build their own computers. Not everyone has the know how or desire to do so. It's much easier to just order already made.

    2. Re:The case is least important by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup - almost any OEM case is nearly useless to reuse. Other issues:

      1. Compact designs often only work with specific board layouts (including assumptions of the height of various components on the board and their position.

      2. The case might or might not have a full set of screw-holes for various board formats.

      3. The connectors for USB/power/reset/speaker/etc often use fancy connectors that are non-standard, rather than just individual connectors. There might even be primitive daughterboards involved.

      4. The power supply might or might not be standard ATX. Granted, that isn't case-related per-se, but it is a chunk of gear that has to be tossed. If the power supply does something weird with the power connections/etc then that is a case issue.

      OEMS do all kinds of crazy stuff that makes their hardware almost impossible to recycle...

  14. Here is an off topic case question by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    why the hell are desktop cases so damn expensive?

    I used to have up right computer cases becasue glass monitors were getting so damn big, and thus heavy. Now with LCD monitors, I would think the desktop would come back.

    It saves more space then the tiny uprights Dell sell that stand next to the monitor, and makes room on the floor.

    Obviously, the people on slashdot that get in and out of there case is probably a higher proportion then most people so I can see why some of you wouldn't want one.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Here is an off topic case question by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, the people on slashdot that get in and out of there case is probably a higher proportion then most people so I can see why some of you wouldn't want one.

      Out? What do you mean by out?

      The case has a transparent side and ventilation for a reason.

    2. Re:Here is an off topic case question by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell most of the $40-$50 dollar cases I find are far MORE attractive then the $300 dollar cases that get sold to the morons with more dollars then sense.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  15. Once again, BeOS was ahead of its time by int69h · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally a use for is_computer_on_fire()

    http://www.eeggs.com/items/15121.html

  16. The throw away computer by tetsukaze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The price of computers coming down is definitely a good thing and making them easier to recycle is great. Unfortunately there is growing trend of waste due to these cheap computers. As a consumer desktop technician I would see people replacing perfectly good hardware due to software issues. They are just so cheap and labor can be be pretty expensive, that it would be stupid to do anything else. The con is that a lot of cheap computers are going to the dump. Things would be perfect if people could learn the basics. Something as basic as backing up files and reinstalling the OS is beyond the scope of most consumers.

  17. Re:Obligatory by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They could easily add a thin layer of foil to the cardboard for RF shielding, without it being a metal case (where the metal is also structural and thus much thicker than you need for shielding). However, I imagine this would scupper the ability to recycle the thing

    Anecdotally, I have run many computers without a case (normally when I have been modifying something, or for brief periods when my existing case has insufficient ventilation for new components but I haven't been able to change it. I've not noticed any problems that I did not notice with the case on. Many of the components (the drives for instance) have their own shielding anyway.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  18. FCC Part 15 class B by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pretty sure a cardboard box with a modern motherboard inside doesn't quite meet the FCC Part 15 class B regulations for unintentional radio emissions needed for residential use. That's why computer cases are usually metal instead of plastic.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:FCC Part 15 class B by tilandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now I don't design computers but I do design radios and I have put devices through FCC. What experience with FCC do you have to qualify your statement that a modern motherboard would not pass FCC?

  19. Re:Not a fire risk by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of my favorite books is 'Centigrade 232'

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Why not corrugated plastic? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen cat carriers made of corrugated plastic (just like cardboard, but with flexible plastic sheeting, it's a good bit stronger than cardboard) and that would seem like a much better choice of material. Liquids aren't an issue and it's still fairly easy to recycle, plus the plastic can be made with different colors and opacities so it would look nicer too.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  21. Re:Let me count the ways... by natehoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't have a quibble with most of your post, but cardboard is a MUCH better dampener of noise and vibrations than metal, especially thin sheet metal. Metal can easily become a sounding board for vibrations. Cardboard, not so much...

    Also, cardboard is pretty structurally strong. Stronger than very thin metal. The only reason cases hold any weight is the internal frame, not the thin sheet metal and plastic most "disposable computer-grade" cases are made out of. That frame could either be retained, or replaced with some triangular corner cardboard reinforcements. It doesn't really get brittle if treated properly (seal it so the humidity remains constant and it can last FAR longer than the 5-year lifespan of the computer inside.

    I see your point on the fireproof thing, though. Once you start effectively fireproofing the cardboard you'll likely undo a lot of the cost savings and environmental benefits.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  22. Not very recycleable. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    a 100% aluminum or steel case is 100% recyclable. This "cardboard" thing is a gimmick. In fact most computer cases metal components are always recycled as the metal has the highest value.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. How about the glue and chemicals in carboard? by plastick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ummm... no.

    Aren't there some terrible chemicals used in the processing of cardboard? Have you ever driven by one of these plants? It's not what I would call "environmentally friendly".

    I mean, kudos for thinking out of the "box" but I think the idea needs work. A kid spills something on the top of the case and you're toast. For what people pay for a modern computer, they want it protected, safe from fire, and they want it to look nice.

  24. Such a bad idea, let me count the ways... by Aphoxema · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Catching on fire
    Getting wet
    Condensation
    Humidity
    Supporting other objects
    Stress
    Changing structure
    Changing composition
    Bacteria
    Mold
    Bugs getting inside, getting them back out
    Mites
    Unwashable
    Overheating
    Weight of components
    EM interference to internal components
    EM interference to external appliances (possible FCC violation)
    Grounding
    Reusability/longevity
    Papercuts
    Transportability
    Modification
    Static
    Security
    Looking stupid

    Did I miss anything?

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  25. Dust by Tdawgless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Working in a large Data Center, we explicitly prohibit staff and customers from bringing cardboard onto the DC floor because of dust. Not only does cardboard have a habit of carrying dust from the outside, it's a huge contributor of dust as the cardboard breaks down. Hopefully they plan on treating the cardboard to mitigate this decomposition.

  26. Re:What about wood? by Firemouth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is anybody familiar with what it takes to make a good wood case?

    Wood.

  27. Re:First! by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think so. Recycling is the LAST of the three. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. This will result in MORE resources being spent and LESS reuse of components.

    Computer cases are one of the most re-usable elements in a system. My first PC, an 8088 PC, used a Cosmol XT case made of steel, and that case and power supply was the centerpiece of my computer from my XT all the way until my K6-2. Along that time, processor speeds increased by a factor of 100 (4.77MHz to 550MHz), memory size increased by a factor of 50 (256kb to 128MB), storage space increased by a factor of 2000(5MB to 10GB). The important standards for case design didn't change over that period, so there was no good reason to change. Also, the case was totally bad-ass. The computer I built to finally replace the aging beast used a new case, and the standards haven't changed since. I've built Athlon 64s with cases from old Pentium IIs or Athlons.

    Making the case of a PC disposable crap is going to result in more waste, not less. Suddenly I won't be able to have the same case for 20 years, I'll have to replace it with every new computer(or more!). Also, it'll lead to less reuse of components. I've built 6 computers this year from parts scavenged from here and there. All of them have found homes. The parts simply wouldn't be able to be scavenged if the machines were made of cardboard. To clean the outsides of the cases, we had to use soap and water that these cases wouldn't stand up to. Some of them were left in the rain and mud for short periods fo time, and wouldn't be functional if not for the fact that they had cases that could withstand the elements.

    My current case could last me another 10-20 years easily, depending on what standards do (a PC case you bought in 1999 would have an ATX form factor and could be reused today. I could see power supply standards but not case standards changing again in that time). Under this regimen, I could end up with a new case every 1-2 years or more. As others have pointed out, there will also be greater stress on components from EMI and RFI. Making less durable paper cases may be slightly easier for recycling, but it's stupid from the perspective of reducing waste.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  28. Re:First! by glebovitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In theory what you say is true. In reality, the landfills are littered with discarded metal PC cases. Just because it CAN be reused, doesn't mean that it is.

  29. Re:First! by appleprophet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a) Who's to say you can't reuse this case?

    b) Your use case is rare. 99.9% of PC users will not be reusing the same case 5 times.

    c) I am guessing it takes dramatically less energy to create and recycle a cardboard case 5 times than it costs to create a single permanent steel case.

  30. In fact by elsJake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buying a proper case , such as a chieftec is the best "upgrade" i've ever done. CPU temp on my Prescott dropped from 80*C to 40*C (no bullshit) due to proper ventilation. Hard drives stopped buzzing all day long , and best of all , unlike all the cheap cases i've ever had this one worked without bending at the rear when inserting the mobo , and is still usable after all these years , and will still be usable when i upgrade the rest of my components. Every time i got a cheap case something on it broke , got really dirty due to bad design or the components just plain didn't fit. The reduced stress due to lots of space inside , toolles screws and reduced "finger cutting in sharp edges" just added to the benefits. It might've cost 5x times as much as an cheap case , but it made up the difference 10 times. Since then I've replaced all cases in the house with proper cases. My point is: cheap metal cases suck anyway , paper would suck even more. Don't be a cheapskate , you get what you pay for. * *doesn't matter if you see the pc as if it were a toaster with more buttons.

    1. Re:In fact by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You and I are not the average PC purchaser - who never opens the machine for three to six years, and then replaces it. For them, the PC *is* just a toaster with more buttons. So long as it works until they feel a need to replace it.

      There were a number of manufacturers experimenting with injection-moulded ABS cases quite a few years ago - they typically needed no tools (or at most a screwdriver for a single screw) to open and service, and could easily be broken down for recycling into a pile of electronics, a stack of plastic and a small amount of sheetmetal. It's quite possible that heavy-duty corrugated cardboard covered with a thin polycarbonate shell and lined with a foil or thin sheetmetal shield woud be able to do just as well for three-year-throw-away consumer-grade computers like most people are using.

      It's also quite hard to see that kind of case taking off for that kind of use, as in five years I expect a three-year-throw-away computer to be about the same size as a hardcover book and easily attach to modular external storage - like what the Mac Mini tries to be. Of course, I've been expecting *that* real-soon-now since I first heard about USB, and I'm still waiting for my jetpack and flying car...