In a hospital environment? All they want is an interactive login? I would say that's pretty hot that they didn't come to your door with torches and pitch forks.
You do sound like you know what you're doing, but how people come to IT and say, "Don't worry about, I know what I'm doing."
I myself work internal IT at a technology company. "IP Engineers" for our production network saw no problem in plugging in "a hub" to our corporate network. They actually had plugged in a home router. They managed to loop the network, flood it with rogue DHCP traffic and open up an unencrypted wireless network. This from people that are paid (a lot more than me) to run a customer facing network.
Long story short, its IT's job to trust no one because most of the time, they're right.
So the cheap devices he used only worked inches away. A more powerful device might work up to 20 meters away. Now, I assume a more powerful antennae is going to mean a bigger one. Isn't this going to stand out? I would hope that there is someone in charge that would notice a foot long antennae being pointed at voting areas.
You can secure the machine itself, but if you don't have real people doing their part, it doesn't matter how secure your voting machine is.
Its true that people will keep wearing watches but just as jewelry. Their function in slowly being replaced by a more useful device. Some people wear glasses because they think they look good, not because their eyes are bad,
This then seems to be the same issue that traditional land based providers run into. It costs a good chunk of money to spread out that way. One of the huge gains of wireless being that the last mile is over the air and essentially free.
Note: I'm not trying to be a kill joy here but it seems these companies haven't gone this route already and I think this is the reason.
Lets not forget a very important factor. I would love some RF guy to correct me, but radio is like the good old hub days. The air is a shared medium. You throw signals in the air, they will interfere with each other. More towers in this case does not equal more bandwidth, it equals more interference. This is where we need some leap of technology where we can cram more data into smaller channels.
I work almost exclusively with Lenovo Thinkpads and I have to say they are the most solid laptops I have ever touched. For the most part, a laptop is a laptop to me, but reliability is a huge concern for a computer that is constantly being moved around. I feel like I could beat a man to death with one these laptops and google map my escape plan with out any hitches.
Where is the middle? Atom based equipment is changing how we define portable computers and is very exciting. These new chips are going to bring amazing power in a portable format. The problem for the average user is that these are two extremes that currently don't help them. The middle of the road laptop that can be used for everyday use has not had any major innovations or significant price drops for some time. I understand diversifying is important, but where is the new tech for that more middle of the road work load?
These activties hurt Microsoft's reputation as well as being a huge burden to users of their products. Microsoft has the money and power to put the hurt on the bad guys. This is win win.
I don't use google docs much and what I have used has been pretty disappointing. That being said, there is a lot potential in the concept. I do hate the idea of renting software but at the very least, there will now be two big players in this market. I would really like to see google being driven to make their software feature competitive with microsoft so I can get one more step away from being stuck with a bulky product from Bill.
I like the idea of a general education on security. I'm not sure what the motivation was for your corporate overlords, but educating users for their own sake is more likely to get them to be compliant at the workplace. Showing them how easy it is to get bugs from social networking sites and how to avoid them is a great idea. It lets them know how to develop good habits at home and thus they are better behaved at work, making your life easier.
In all seriousness, I have also run into people that won't give up on that OS. The amazing part to me is that they don't really have to. Certain tasks do not change and despite the lack of support from Apple and software vendors most of those system are running smoothly. It could be due to the larger install base, but Windows 9x systems I run into that are task specific are plagued with issues.
The price of computers coming down is definitely a good thing and making them easier to recycle is great. Unfortunately there is growing trend of waste due to these cheap computers. As a consumer desktop technician I would see people replacing perfectly good hardware due to software issues. They are just so cheap and labor can be be pretty expensive, that it would be stupid to do anything else. The con is that a lot of cheap computers are going to the dump. Things would be perfect if people could learn the basics. Something as basic as backing up files and reinstalling the OS is beyond the scope of most consumers.
If we could get them to merge, we could have a new amazing desktop that would finally kill windows, bring us world peace and bring Utopian happiness to the masses. I shall call it Party Desktop.
Sony is shutting down half the servers. One half, leaving approximately one other half. This is actually good for everybody. The remaining players will actually get to play with other people, the whole point of MMOs I'm told. In addition Sony gets to spend less money supporting the game which is good for them.
Oh yeah, we get to rail on Galaxies. That's good too.
Well, someone apparently has used publicly available information to find a weakness. Now that the door is open, who is stop a terrorist. With the grid being such a mess, won't it be that much harder to fix the problem if we did have an attack of this kind?
Google is pretty keen on staying on the good side of the industry, but there is another aspect to consider. By focusing on making the data mobile you can go both ways. A modular and standardized method of storing data makes it easier for people to move over to google as well as move out. I could even see some sort of service for migrating data between different services come out of this group.
I agree that there have always been games that do focus on game play and leave out plot. I also agree that there are some very good games out there that do have amazing stories and writing. What I am seeing is a general trend away from those things. The best games will have everything, but the way I see it, games like Mass Effect and Bioshock are a dying breed. I loved the plots and characters in those games but I feel if the stories had been so so, they still would have been successful. I can't predict the future, but I think these games are on the way out.
I can really appreciate the technology that has evolved to make modern games what they are. It has changed the way we play games, but at a cost. I miss the old days of 70+ hours of a great story. You just can't do that any more. Good writing just doesn't pay off any more. Back in the days of lousy graphics and limited features, a story had to draw you in. Now there are so many other components that a good story isn't important. I am no exception. I used to tolerate a whole lot to get to the juicy ending, but now if the game doesn't hold me with other aspects, I end up ditching it. Likewise, if a game has quality visuals and novel game play, I won't care that the writing is crap.
Oh the old day.
Oh by the way, I also used to haul rocks to school in the snow uphill both ways.
We can blame our hate pet OS for all of the internet evil out there, but we need to remember one important thing: people are almost always the week link in security. If someone knows what they are doing, it is very hard to penetrate a linux server... or a windows server. There will always be those that can break through the best security, but there is a lot of low hanging fruit and not just on the windows tree.
Slashdot Mirror
In a hospital environment? All they want is an interactive login? I would say that's pretty hot that they didn't come to your door with torches and pitch forks. You do sound like you know what you're doing, but how people come to IT and say, "Don't worry about, I know what I'm doing." I myself work internal IT at a technology company. "IP Engineers" for our production network saw no problem in plugging in "a hub" to our corporate network. They actually had plugged in a home router. They managed to loop the network, flood it with rogue DHCP traffic and open up an unencrypted wireless network. This from people that are paid (a lot more than me) to run a customer facing network. Long story short, its IT's job to trust no one because most of the time, they're right.
So the cheap devices he used only worked inches away. A more powerful device might work up to 20 meters away. Now, I assume a more powerful antennae is going to mean a bigger one. Isn't this going to stand out? I would hope that there is someone in charge that would notice a foot long antennae being pointed at voting areas. You can secure the machine itself, but if you don't have real people doing their part, it doesn't matter how secure your voting machine is.
Its true that people will keep wearing watches but just as jewelry. Their function in slowly being replaced by a more useful device. Some people wear glasses because they think they look good, not because their eyes are bad,
This then seems to be the same issue that traditional land based providers run into. It costs a good chunk of money to spread out that way. One of the huge gains of wireless being that the last mile is over the air and essentially free. Note: I'm not trying to be a kill joy here but it seems these companies haven't gone this route already and I think this is the reason.
Lets not forget a very important factor. I would love some RF guy to correct me, but radio is like the good old hub days. The air is a shared medium. You throw signals in the air, they will interfere with each other. More towers in this case does not equal more bandwidth, it equals more interference. This is where we need some leap of technology where we can cram more data into smaller channels.
I work almost exclusively with Lenovo Thinkpads and I have to say they are the most solid laptops I have ever touched. For the most part, a laptop is a laptop to me, but reliability is a huge concern for a computer that is constantly being moved around. I feel like I could beat a man to death with one these laptops and google map my escape plan with out any hitches.
Where is the middle? Atom based equipment is changing how we define portable computers and is very exciting. These new chips are going to bring amazing power in a portable format. The problem for the average user is that these are two extremes that currently don't help them. The middle of the road laptop that can be used for everyday use has not had any major innovations or significant price drops for some time. I understand diversifying is important, but where is the new tech for that more middle of the road work load?
These activties hurt Microsoft's reputation as well as being a huge burden to users of their products. Microsoft has the money and power to put the hurt on the bad guys. This is win win.
I don't use google docs much and what I have used has been pretty disappointing. That being said, there is a lot potential in the concept. I do hate the idea of renting software but at the very least, there will now be two big players in this market. I would really like to see google being driven to make their software feature competitive with microsoft so I can get one more step away from being stuck with a bulky product from Bill.
I like the idea of a general education on security. I'm not sure what the motivation was for your corporate overlords, but educating users for their own sake is more likely to get them to be compliant at the workplace. Showing them how easy it is to get bugs from social networking sites and how to avoid them is a great idea. It lets them know how to develop good habits at home and thus they are better behaved at work, making your life easier.
It would be good for international trade relations and help us here in the states with our problem with technologically inept judges.
In all seriousness, I have also run into people that won't give up on that OS. The amazing part to me is that they don't really have to. Certain tasks do not change and despite the lack of support from Apple and software vendors most of those system are running smoothly. It could be due to the larger install base, but Windows 9x systems I run into that are task specific are plagued with issues.
Apple hires hit men to track down users and kill them
The price of computers coming down is definitely a good thing and making them easier to recycle is great. Unfortunately there is growing trend of waste due to these cheap computers. As a consumer desktop technician I would see people replacing perfectly good hardware due to software issues. They are just so cheap and labor can be be pretty expensive, that it would be stupid to do anything else. The con is that a lot of cheap computers are going to the dump. Things would be perfect if people could learn the basics. Something as basic as backing up files and reinstalling the OS is beyond the scope of most consumers.
If we could get them to merge, we could have a new amazing desktop that would finally kill windows, bring us world peace and bring Utopian happiness to the masses. I shall call it Party Desktop.
Sony is shutting down half the servers. One half, leaving approximately one other half. This is actually good for everybody. The remaining players will actually get to play with other people, the whole point of MMOs I'm told. In addition Sony gets to spend less money supporting the game which is good for them. Oh yeah, we get to rail on Galaxies. That's good too.
Well, someone apparently has used publicly available information to find a weakness. Now that the door is open, who is stop a terrorist. With the grid being such a mess, won't it be that much harder to fix the problem if we did have an attack of this kind?
Google is pretty keen on staying on the good side of the industry, but there is another aspect to consider. By focusing on making the data mobile you can go both ways. A modular and standardized method of storing data makes it easier for people to move over to google as well as move out. I could even see some sort of service for migrating data between different services come out of this group.
I agree that there have always been games that do focus on game play and leave out plot. I also agree that there are some very good games out there that do have amazing stories and writing. What I am seeing is a general trend away from those things. The best games will have everything, but the way I see it, games like Mass Effect and Bioshock are a dying breed. I loved the plots and characters in those games but I feel if the stories had been so so, they still would have been successful. I can't predict the future, but I think these games are on the way out.
A wealthy city in spitting distance of Microsoft is investing in a buzz technology? Something tells me this is not a valid indicator for other cities.
I can really appreciate the technology that has evolved to make modern games what they are. It has changed the way we play games, but at a cost. I miss the old days of 70+ hours of a great story. You just can't do that any more. Good writing just doesn't pay off any more. Back in the days of lousy graphics and limited features, a story had to draw you in. Now there are so many other components that a good story isn't important. I am no exception. I used to tolerate a whole lot to get to the juicy ending, but now if the game doesn't hold me with other aspects, I end up ditching it. Likewise, if a game has quality visuals and novel game play, I won't care that the writing is crap. Oh the old day. Oh by the way, I also used to haul rocks to school in the snow uphill both ways.
We can blame our hate pet OS for all of the internet evil out there, but we need to remember one important thing: people are almost always the week link in security. If someone knows what they are doing, it is very hard to penetrate a linux server... or a windows server. There will always be those that can break through the best security, but there is a lot of low hanging fruit and not just on the windows tree.