Slashdot Mirror
Ministry of Defense's "How To Stop Leaks" Document Is Leaked
samzenpus writes "A restricted 2,400 page-document put out by the MoD designed to help intelligence personnel with information security has been leaked onto the internet. Wikileaks notes that Joint Services Protocol 440 (JSP 440), was published in 2001 and lays out protocols to defend against hackers, journalists, and foreign spies. it says, 'Leaks usually take the form of reports in the public media which appear to involve the unauthorized disclosure of official information (whether protectively marked or not) that causes political harm or embarrassment to either the UK Government or the Department concerned... The threat [of leakage] is less likely to arise from positive acts of counter-espionage, than from leakage of information through disaffected members of staff, or as a result of the attentions of an investigative journalist, or simply by accident or carelessness.' " Looks like it's time to write JSP 441.
Documentation security - you're doing it wrong.
The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
Declare an inexistent document the ultimate reference on how to stop leaks, put references to it in selected internal documents and even build fake leaks about its existence. As noone will be able to find it, will really work, even against the human factor. You can make a gigantic library of such documents, and put all of them in the unexistent parallel library of congress, where noone will be able to see what countain all those leak-proof documents against sensible matters of national security. Next time someone will try to make problems, will be so sure that will be a full non-existent document about him in that library where everything is afraid of become known is written that will discard that idea, making the world a safer place.
It's ironic, almost like rain on your wedding day.
Now with 50% more irony.
These people are unable to adapt to a world where information can be sent around the world in seconds. They are the stupid, violent policemen who might punch you for looking at them but won't stop crime, terrorism, or anything else because they belong to some WW2 era not the current world.
They want to play stupid games with hidden codewords so they can pretend they are more important than 'civilians', all they really do is waste resources.
The Irony Department is going to get it for this.
Seriously? Who the fuck would read something that long? How can they expect a document that long to have any effect on anything aside from bureaucracy? If the document had only been two or three pages people probably would have read and understood it.
Whoever drafted and approved the document should be shot. Same with all the people that write bills that are hundreds or thousands of pages long, and doubly so for the people that vote for and sign them without having ever read them.
Are we really surprised? This is the country where politicians visit the Prime Minister in Downing Street holding confidential documents face out for the paparazzi to photograph - on more than one occasion
D'oh.
I'll take mine odf... less err security issues.
Surely leaking this document is good practice? It's the opposite of 'security through obscurity'. Like peer-review, comments from the wider world would only help harden their leak-prevention methods.
A quick solution would be to just have less secrets. Telling everyone what you are doing isn't that hard - and the foreign spies, hackers and journalists will find out anyway.
I heard you like leaks...
The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
How not to be seen (Caption on screen: 'HM GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE FILM NO. 42 PARA 6. "HOW NOT TO BE SEEN"') Voice Over: In this film we hope to show how not to be seen. This is Mr. E.R. Bradshaw of Napier Court, Black Lion Road London SE5. He can not be seen. Now I am going to ask him to stand up. Mr. Bradshaw will you stand up please In the distance Mr Bradshaw stands up. There is a loud gunshot as Mr Bradshaw is shot in the stomach. He crumples to the ground Voice Over: This demonstrates the value of not being seen.
I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
It's already clogged and impossible to get. So in essence MoD may yet find another way to prevent general public from getting the documents. Create rule to "slashdot" web site hosting documents..
Surely leaking this document is good practice? It's the opposite of 'security through obscurity'. Like peer-review, comments from the wider world would only help harden their leak-prevention methods.
They can't prevent leaks, they are just too stupid to realize it.
What they can do is control the media and that alone controls the majority.
Security through leakage?
Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
Ministerial Advisers leak.
Ministers Leak. And at the worst possible moments.
Not journalists - They have the legal editor in their pay, and FOI requests are fair go. Even the truth sometimes becomes self evident. If anything, leaks have gone down.
The REAL failure is not getting the Chinese to copy the Banking Failures or do an Enron or even GM bailout. Oh well, they did buy lots of US Shares ;-).
Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy of a government that keeps invading more and more of citizens privacy in the name of corporate and so called national interests all the while trying to keep their own embarrasing secrets from leaking?
In my opinion, anything a government would be embarressed about deserves to be leaked to the public.
You can't handle the truth!
It's only 1100 pages, and suggests using both hands.
In both the U.K. and U.S., the government is heavily influenced by people who want war so that they can make easy weapons profits.
It's like rain on your wedding day, or a green light when you're already late. Maybe some good advice that you just didn't take...
(obligatory)
epic fail
You hit the nail on the head with "in the name of the people." The real root of the problem is that the people give their proxy to someone else and expect that someone else to faithfully execute it. When we all know perfectly well that that almost never, ever happens.
If the people want the government to be truly representative of themselves, then they need to make it their own. Through open source of course.
One scenario is that this removes any value in the security document....so it's no big issue if it is leaked.
(yes, there's a difference between method and implementation)
were I not an anonymouse coward, I'd mod you up for "Funny" for the brilliant use of Tom Cruise references
"It's like rain on you wedding day..."
Fail classified document is fail?
Stop letting congress-critters have the information. When Bush was president, Democrats selectively leaked classified information to harm him. I have no doubt it will happen the other way around now with Obama and the Republicans.
As for pork barrel, we aren't even in the same room as the US, where it is part of business as usual, Alaskan bridges, protection of industries, you name it.
Assuming you live in the UK, I have a suggestion. We are an overpopulated little island. Why not emigrate somewhere with less political corruption?
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
No spy is as pervasive or unstoppable as the internet.
This problem has already been solved (by the Dutch no less). Put your finger in the dike!
L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
As a conspiriacy theoriest, I suggest that it was intended for the document to be leaked, making hackers and spies feel as though they have the government all figured out. IT's ALL LIES!
Iiiiiiiiirony!
We apologise again for the fault in the subtitles.
Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.
Am I alone or did some one else fund this funny.
Those are your words.
Do you have the intellectual honesty to examine yourself and realize you are every bit as corrupt as those you condemn?
The only difference is how cheaply you are bought. That is precisely how the truly rich and powerful manipulate and divide the rest of us.
Oh, and do you think there might be some connection between higher taxes and a more egalitarian and moral society? Of course you don't, because you have been co-opted and corrupted by the rich, and now you are theirs, like a vampire's familiar.