Slashdot Mirror
New Ad-Aware Offers Behavioral Detection
With the latest release of the popular anti-malware tool Ad-Aware, Lavasoft has added what is being referring to as "Genotype," a heuristic-based behavioral detection engine. In addition to a new (and what appears to be faster) method of detection and elimination, there are a few incremental updates like the simple/advanced toggle and a potentially always-on "gaming mode," which attempts to do real-time filtering while you are playing games, watching videos, or just browsing.
Warning, The page you are about to view contains P0rN and a small malware virus, would you like to continue?
Options:
Yes give me the Virus
No Block the P0rN.
) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
/uninstall
No, I don't have AdAware...
Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
"Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
Malware writers are smart enough to overcome heuristics-based solutions. Just like spammers.
As a trained biologist, I take exception to the failure to analogize properly. A genotype is the genetic description of an organism. This has nothing to do with a system that learns from experience.
Those who create software: Please, if you are going to use a word from a different field to name or describe your program, try to pick a word that creates some sort of sensible analogy rather than choosing one that sounds cool and is unused. Otherwise, you risk sounding like an idiot.
I used to love it back in the day, removed all kinds of spywave, simple gui, updated easy enough, you ran it when you wanted, etc
These days it keeps half a dozen processes running in the background with more to be opened if you do any kind of scan. I realize having real-time protection is a nice feature, having to go in and auto disable all these is a pain. If you're still getting malware on the go, so to speak, from websites, and aren't using a browser than's got security or at least security add-ons (Firefox + Noscript + ABP + Flashblock) then I could understand the need for it.
Add in an anti virus software that does the same X number of processes in the background plus Ad-Aware thats way more bogged down software than ever. Ad-Aware used to be simple, clean and sleek, now it's just bloated shovelware (how quickly did they move from Version X to SE, to Version X.1?)
Stick with Spybot, Malwarebytes, HijackThis and a decent backup like Nod32, Avast or AVG, imho.
Aw Frell this
The reason for the mysterious death of many computer users in the last time has been found. It turned out they all had an anti-malware program running which tried to detect and eliminate malware through analyzing its behaviour. Apparently the software detected dangerous behaviour from the computer users and therefore decided to eliminate them in order to protect the system.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Wile E. Coyote will definitely succeed this time...
839*929
... nobody know's you're a nigger
Nowhameen fshizzle?
I was tempted at first to say Genotype should instead have been named Phenotype, but in the realm of computers and software (as opposed to biological species), Lamarckian inheritance is widespread.
Like almost all fee-based malware products marketed to home users, Adaware now-a-days is just bloatware crap that seems to cause as many problems as it tries to solve. The performance degradation of its background service is almost worse than what some malware causes. Avoid like the plague.
I advise all my home user customers to never pay for ANY antivirus/antispyware software. None of it prevents anything anymore and isn't worth spending money on. All it's good for anymore is notifying you after the fact when you get an infection and then most people have to pay to have it cleaned anyway. Install Firefox & set it as the default browser then install AVG/Avast/Spybot/etc (anything as long as its free) to provide infection notifications.
according to several major computer publishers the '09 version of Norton did a lot better than all other antivirus software according to MaximumPC.com http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/protect_your_pc_from_guys_like_this
and PCWorld.com
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/44052/review/internet_security_2009.html
Not that either are like security mags I'm an MPC fanboy, so take this as you will.
How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
Based on the title of the article - I thought the "behavioral detection" might have been based on the Slashdot "Karma Engine". I guess not.
---- ... and about to get worse. :(
Yes, my karma is currently "bad"
L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
If you have 1 detection on one software suite, how many do you have on any other suite?
My gues is N +X where N is the number of suites you try and X is any positive integer >1.
That's why the solution really is this: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1388939&cid=29619053
How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
Genotype is the genes. (and the age-old signature based detection method)
Phenotype is the behaviour. (teh new koolness TM, (R), (C), patent pending)
Check wikipedia if in doubt.
And LOL at the windoze lusers always wrangling with malware... Oh boy. :)))
What's new about heuristics?
Microsoft Security Essentials is free and does an excellent job. What's more, on a fast machine you will not be aware of it in operation. Works for me.
What finger am i holding up for that company.....
Ah, so that's what the Ad-Aware 11 logo looks like!
But seriously: How do you trust a "security" company whose own download links all lead to a dead blank page until you unblock JavaScript not only on their site (www.lavasoft.com) but on a third-party site you've never heard of (www.trialpay.com)?
I used to put Ad-Aware on every computer, but around version 7 Ad-Watch started dragging down my clients' computers, then started dragging down my computers. I still offer it occasionally to clients who are unusually malware-prone, but it got past the cure-is-worse-than-the-disease part for a lot of people a while back. Maybe this new buzzword-thing version will clear some of that up.
Who are you and what do you want?
PS you forgot to mention *BSD
In the algorithmic evolution of this spatial-temporal epoch, I have exponentially typed this topical Slashdot replicatory chromatogram digitally on my open source keyboard while genotypically examining my quantum thermoelectric quasi-condensate crystalline oculatory monitor.
I used to use Ad-aware Pro way back when the newest version was 6.0 (not sure was the newest one is now). However, I eventually had to get rid of it. I found that it was very ineffective at actually removing active Malware. Basically what would happen is that because the Malware is already loaded into memory (sometimes even when in safe mode), ad-aware could not terminate the processes that would in turn free up the files to be deleted. So it told me adware was present but could do nothing more. In addition, Ad-Aware used to have something called "Ad-watch" which provided real-time scanning and could prevent unauthorized registry edits. The problem is that it also prompted you when you tried to install legit software and the WORST case ever is when ad-watch eats up all your CPU because it tries and blocks registry edits that malware continuously makes in an endless loop (i.e. when a mal-ware registry entry is removed/blocked, the malware automatically detects this and re-adds itself). Also, from what I remember, Ad-Aware did nothing about rogue Active-X controls either (which I know detects when you try and close the the Malware's related processes and then in turn restores it). To summarize, you basically have to kill all processes, active-x controls, and services created by the Malware manually before Ad-Aware and Ad-Watch could do its thing. That stuff should be done "for you".