Slashdot Mirror


Doing Internet Searches Boosts Older Brains

Hugh Pickens writes "Medical News Daily reports that researchers have found signs of enhanced neural stimulation in parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning when they scanned the brains of middle-aged and older first-time Internet users after only seven days of performing Internet searches. 'We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function,' says Dr Gary Small, a professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA. At the start of the study, the participants performed Internet searches while the researchers took fMRI scans of their brains to track changes in blood flow in the brain and record subtle changes in neural activity. After practicing searching the Internet for 7 days over 2 weeks at home, the brains of the Internet novices showed activity in the same regions as before, but this time there was new activity in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus, the parts of the brain that are important for working memory and decision-making. 'You can exercise your mind by using the Internet, but it depends on how it's used,' adds Small. 'If you get hooked on gambling or eBay shopping, that may not be positive.'"

65 comments

  1. First thought. by Rockoon · · Score: 1, Funny

    First Thought!

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  2. Pron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about searching for pron? Or reading 4chan? What does that do to your brain?

    1. Re:Pron by A12m0v · · Score: 1
      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  3. If searching stimulates brain activity.... by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 3, Funny

    If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.

    --
    SSC
    1. Re:If searching stimulates brain activity.... by OutputLogic · · Score: 1

      How about reading Slashdot. Does it stimulate brain activity?

    2. Re:If searching stimulates brain activity.... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.

      Searching for pr0n doesn't count. However, your visual cortex has enlarged enough that your eyes are going to asplode.

    3. Re:If searching stimulates brain activity.... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Trouble is, if you do a search for the Riemann zeta function, all you'll get is 1,000,000,000 hits for a particularly attractive actress. And that'll stimulate activity, but for the wrong brain.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:If searching stimulates brain activity.... by clone53421 · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  4. No control condition? by beatsme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without control, it's hard to say whether or not this is just a case of the Hawthorne effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect

    1. Re:No control condition? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's not.

      There's an unbelieveably profound effect that net access brings, even after the "guttersnipe" activities.

      You & friends are moping around your hangout wondering whether Saul Rubinek's latest show had anything to do with a guest episode he played 19ish years ago.

      (Hyberbolic drama)
      Oh come on. You don't know who Saul Rubinek is?? Oh you do. Good.
      Did you forget what his new show is? No? Also good.
      Now, did you get his guest episode? Do you even know the show? (Yes you do, but you're getting lost in my vague wording)

      Without the net you're sunk. So you shrug and go back to your drink.

      With the net, you discover that Kivas Fajo now worked at Warehouse 13.

      The entire rest of your conversation becomes smarter.

      It's the Flynn Effect, not only Hawthorne.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:No control condition? by Shrike82 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was thinking along similar lines, but I'm more inclined to attribute it to the fact that they're first-time Internet users, and that learning how to use a search engine and formulate a good search for the first time is bound to show brain development and "enhanced neural stimulation". Replace "Internet searching" with anything else and introduce it to people who have never done it before and I bet you'll find new brain development and enhanced neural stimulation. It's called "learning" and, shockingly, when people learn new things their brain structure changes.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    3. Re:No control condition? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "You don't know who Saul Rubinek is??"

      If he wasn't in the Bible, where he persecuted Jesus, then I have no idea. Did he ever do anything worth knowing about?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:No control condition? by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. "Learning new skills stimulates brain -- film at 11" would be a better headline.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    5. Re:No control condition? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      However I think internet searching may be more effective then just learning a new skill. When you search threw the stuff you find a lot of stuff that you have never though about based on that topic... For example I just did a google search for well. Thinking of a Well for water where Little Timmy can fall in. Then the first search result was for Wells Fargo then there are a bunch of site for wellness and there is a result for digging a well. So for that search result I was exposed 3 different idea at once. My brain needed to do what a computer cant and process the information for relevancy for the search. So I saw Wells Fargo, I went well that is a Bank (Or the traditional shipping carrier of the old days) So my brain processed all that information and heck even the tune from the Music Man. Then there is wellness my brain scolded me for having a sandwich at McDonalds today saying I need to eat healthier. Then finally I see information about Well. So that was a lot or processing for my brain. Much more if I was just trying to learn a new skill.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:No control condition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFA, there was a control group: similarly aged people who had experience with the internet. The interesting part of this study was that after only two weeks of internet use, the brains of of the internet novices began to look like the brains of the experienced internet users.

    7. Re:No control condition? by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      Old man: OMG I'm being studied! Scientist: Did you see that spike in brain activity? Old man: Now what the hell is this google thing? I dont get it... Scientist: Wait, no, its dropping off again...

    8. Re:No control condition? by piojo · · Score: 1

      Still, some new skills stimulate the brain more than others. I was surprised to find that learning a new keymap stimulated my brain the same amount as immersing myself in a foreign language for a few hours. (Both experiences resulted in a sort of mental tiredness and mild difficulty speaking English. It was surreal.)

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    9. Re:No control condition? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. You don't know who Saul Rubinek is??

      Yeah, he played Lon Cohen in A Nero Wolfe Mystery. Except the pilot, where he played Saul Panzer.

      (And now everyone else runs off to the Internet to confirm that. What can I say? Loved that show.)

    10. Re:No control condition? by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      I'm moderately terrified that I actually recognized the name "Kivas Fajo" and the show it came from without the Internet...

  5. BREAKING NEWS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Performing or learning uncommon or new tasks stimulates brain activity.

    Up next, how IMPORTANT SCIENCE TYPE PEOPLE claim that thinking causes increased brain activity.

    More at eleven...

  6. It doesn't seem so hard by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1 - Click browser's search box.
    2 - Type 'P', 'O', 'R', 'N'.
    3 - Press 'Enter'.

    I can't imagine a scenario where a search stimulates brain acti... Ohhh, ok. I get it now.

    1. Re:It doesn't seem so hard by digitig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 - Click browser's search box. 2 - Type 'P', 'O', 'R', 'N'. 3 - Press 'Enter'.

      I can't imagine a scenario where a search stimulates brain acti... Ohhh, ok. I get it now.

      It stimulates "parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning" when they try to work out how to pay off their credit card bill and how to explain their browser history to their wives.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:It doesn't seem so hard by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      No, no, you got it wrong.

      "parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning"

      This is clearly about the decision-making brain, not the intracraneal mundane problems solver.

    3. Re:It doesn't seem so hard by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't seem hard, you're not searching for the good stuff.

      (at least for men)

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:It doesn't seem so hard by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to stimulate activity in the thinker head, not the other one...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  7. i'm not screwing around, boss, honest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these google searches I am doing on stuff like "Hot Anime Chicks" and "Spongebob Squarepants" are making me smarter and more productive!

  8. Well, they do need to find innovative ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    to get those damn kids off their lawn, and the internet can help!

  9. First.... oh hell by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have gotten first post but I had to Google to find what a "post" was. I think I found one.

    Now get off my.... uh, what was I talking about again?

  10. Doing searches by zoomshorts · · Score: 1

    provides older people the best way to phrase a search, it forces them to come up with
    things that are related to their questions. Simple.

    1. Re:Doing searches by bkr1_2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish my mom and sister would learn this "simple" technique. I always get the call... My first question is always, "did you google it? No? Why don't you try? Hey, look, first response to is an answer to your question. See, that only took 30 seconds and you've been hemming and hawing for the last 2 hours and finally decided to call me."

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    2. Re:Doing searches by bmwEnthusiast · · Score: 1

      Yeah I used to get the same thing until I learned about lmgtfy.com (letmegooglethatforyou.com). You type in the search phrase and and hit the "Google Search" button. It gives you a link that has animation of someone typing in the search term and moving the mouse to click search. It then displays normal google results. Its pretty effective in making the person feel like they could have done it for themselves. (example link: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=slashdot ) Enjoy!

  11. New stuff by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I suspect the boost is simply that they're doing something new to them. I doubt that old people who have been online for years would get the same "boost" from just searching.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:New stuff by behemoth64 · · Score: 1

      Or even simpler, its simply that they're doing something with their brain

  12. It's all part of the "plan" by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    Or, as some would call it, Google Healthcare Initiative,... ;-)

  13. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course decision making is going to skyrocket. They've never had so much porn to choose from!

  14. It's all part of the plan by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mushy mush!! Hmmm

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  15. Space Travel for the common man by Dareth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, come up with a way for the common man to go to Mars. Rich rappers like 50 Cents can pay their own way!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Space Travel for the common man by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.

      Hey, come up with a way for the common man to go to Mars. Rich rappers like 50 Cents can pay their own way!

      On the contrary, I'd pay good money for 50 Cent and Kanye West to travel to Mars, so long as the trip was guaranteed one-way.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  16. Obligatory reference by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    This is your old brain, this is your old brain on internet searches. Any questions, grandpa?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  17. In other words... by babboo65 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quaero ergo cogito?

  18. Re:Who? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Brilliant Setup-Man to my standup riff.

    That of course is what we used to ask each other. Now you can look it up.

    That is, except we have now replaced having no hope of knowing who someone is with being too lazy to bother.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  19. catch22 by muckracer · · Score: 1

    I was gonna improve my brain 'n all but I can' remember what I was gonna search for... :-/

  20. Not Internet Related by shock1970 · · Score: 1

    Performing any new activity creates stress, because the brain wants to follow its existing neural pathways to accomplish a set of behavior. This is where the phrase "you can't teach an old dog a new trick" expression comes from. After a short time of performing the repetitive behavior, as a way to overcome the stress, the brain will start to create new neural pathways which strengthen with additional repetition. This behavior is not unique to internet searches and it surprises me that it is news-worthy.

  21. Oblig. XKCD by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  22. Too much of a good thing? by DJGrahamJ · · Score: 1

    If some computer-related activities can (apparently) change the way the brain works, I wonder if too much of it can have adverse effects. For example I've been using computers for about 30 years now and it's pretty apparent that my brain works quite differently than people who don't. Has this left me at a disadvantage WRT social interaction? I wonder if anyone has done research on that. *searches Google for it* d'oh!

  23. If you make people think... by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... their brain works more.

    That's all there is to it. Age, searching, internet, none of that is relevant other than being conditions under which it can happen. Identical results can be had with kids doing stem completion tasks (E A _ _ _ = E A R T H), college students doing a Stroop task (words naming colors, in that color or a different one), and any brain you can get to sit still and problem solve while stuck inside a tube with horrible noises going on.

    TFA is a prime example of someone doing a far too specific test on a general principle and either thinking or pretending to have discovered something. I'm going to go with "pretending" since the new results after practice were seen in the middle and interior frontal gyri, and he claims these results are due to two specific processing tasks, but neglects to mention that the two regions make up more than half the frontal lobes in which there are obviously a great number of things going on, many of which would be occurring during the task, their design is completely incapable of telling the difference between excitatory and inhibitory activation, and there is no word on whether the 'enhanced' neural activity correlated with improved ability to search and/or answer relevant questions, without which one could just as easily make a case that the increased activation was a sign of boredom for having to do the same damn stuff again that they've been doing the past two weeks at home.

    Someone needs to do a study and see whether asking hard questions about this stuff of researchers giving talks on it when they clearly don't know enough about what they're doing makes their brains light up in the right places, because if you make people think, their brain works harder. Wouldn't have happened here, because they wouldn't have been forced to answer the questions -- this was just a poster. Anyone can get any poster into one of these conferences as long as it says fMRI on it.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:If you make people think... by Miow · · Score: 1

      ... their brain works more.

      That's all there is to it. Age, searching, internet, none of that is relevant other than being conditions under which it can happen. Identical results can be had with kids doing stem completion tasks (E A _ _ _ = E A R T H), college students doing a Stroop task (words naming colors, in that color or a different one), and any brain you can get to sit still and problem solve while stuck inside a tube with horrible noises going on.

      TFA is a prime example of someone doing a far too specific test on a general principle and either thinking or pretending to have discovered something. I'm going to go with "pretending" since the new results after practice were seen in the middle and interior frontal gyri, and he claims these results are due to two specific processing tasks, but neglects to mention that the two regions make up more than half the frontal lobes in which there are obviously a great number of things going on, many of which would be occurring during the task, their design is completely incapable of telling the difference between excitatory and inhibitory activation, and there is no word on whether the 'enhanced' neural activity correlated with improved ability to search and/or answer relevant questions, without which one could just as easily make a case that the increased activation was a sign of boredom for having to do the same damn stuff again that they've been doing the past two weeks at home.

      Someone needs to do a study and see whether asking hard questions about this stuff of researchers giving talks on it when they clearly don't know enough about what they're doing makes their brains light up in the right places, because if you make people think, their brain works harder. Wouldn't have happened here, because they wouldn't have been forced to answer the questions -- this was just a poster. Anyone can get any poster into one of these conferences as long as it says fMRI on it.

      I teach elderly people how to use the internet along with other computer skills. It actually does help them as unlike simply learning something new, the internet and computer skills quickly leads onto a range of other skills that they can pick up quickly by themselves. If you think young people are good at picking up computer skills you should try working in primary schools with mainly young women teachers. Most can hardly get past simple word processing. The difficulty of teaching the elderly in not to do with their brain power but they are not motivated enough to want to learn as they have few others to impress. I also teach martial arts, scuba diving, bebop guitar, and DIY skills. Mainly to younger people - who want life pout on a plate for them. Oh yes, I'm 79 you can check out who I am by looking up my various web sites on how to make movies, for children.

    2. Re:If you make people think... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      E A _ _ _ = E A R T H

      No, it's E A T E N you turkey. And swiss. On rye. With mustard! Mmm.

      Yes, I'm hungry. I'm always hungry, can you tell?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. IMPORTANT UPDATE!! by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    slashdot lowers readers' IQs.

    Also, I can't believe no one broke out a Billy Madison quote for this story. e.g. "...and we are all dumber for having heard it. You are awarded zero points and may God have mercy on your soul." "A simple 'no' would have done."

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  25. In other news, dead salmon by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    The neural activity measured in several dead salmon shows a clear reaction to human faces. This proves beyond a doubt the accuracy of studies based on mass EEG tests.

    http://sciencestage.com/resources/dead-salmon-responds-portraits-people

    1. Re:In other news, dead salmon by WAG24601G · · Score: 1

      You mean fMRI. EEG has nothing to do with the salmon study.

      That said, TFA cites fMRI also, so your comparison to the salmon study is plausible, if not terribly informative.

      --
      Everything is easy when you don't understand the problem.
    2. Re:In other news, dead salmon by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      I think the salmon study deserved an igNobel. Maybe if they get it in print...

  26. first-time Internet users by vlm · · Score: 1

    first-time Internet users

    That must be a strange population, very distinct from normal society. I'm not sure their brain data is relevant to ours.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  27. Medicine Porn Story by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    Those are the keywords for this article.

    It sounds like somebody speaking Engrish on the streets of Hong Kong, hawking pirated DVDs of "Hot Nurses 4". "You there, you want Medicine Porn Story!"

  28. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does the author jump to the conclusion that gambling or shopping detriment cognitive thinking? What scientific method did he use to figure that out?

  29. Mars Immigration Department Called by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Mars Immigration Department called and said they would take 50. But they will not grant Kanye a travel visa under any circumstances. Probably because the Intergalactic Awards Show is coming up soon and will be hosted there.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  30. In related news by AniVisual · · Score: 1

    Web surfers have found a significant increase in half-decayed jelly-like substances in the cloud. Forensics reveal that these jelly-like substances were once ancient living organisms which died from traumatic acceleration. "Something must have boosted these jellies," says Cloud Detective Henry Dave, "it appears that the older these organisms get, the more suspect they become to being forcibly accelerated away from their shells while doing Internet searches."