Slashdot Mirror


A Clever New Approach To Desalination

jbeaupre writes "The Economist reports on progress by a company called Saltworks on using saline gradients to do the heavy lifting of desalination. In essence, Saltworks uses solar energy or waste heat to concentrate sea water. They then use the ionic gradient between the concentrated brine and two sea-water streams to pull ions from from a 3rd sea-water stream. It appears to work with entropy by trading the reduced entropy of the desalinated water against the increased entropy of 'mixing' the brine and the other sea-water streams. The article only discusses Na and Cl, but even just removing these ions is a step in the right direction."

128 comments

  1. Entropy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they need entropy why don't they just use /dev/random rather than wasting valuable solar energy?

  2. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This could create greater access to fresh water. That could reduce the likelihood of a water based we're-all-going-to-die situation. What if we have to find some other end of the world catastrophe to whine about?

    1. Re:Oh no! by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

      That's the beautiful thing about water based catastrophie! Too much is as bad as too little.

  3. Making Dew by lyinhart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thinking about desalination makes me remember that episode of "The Voyage the Mimi" in which they used the process to make drinking water:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-524069894840499801# (A/V's not synced)

    --
    Freedom is drinking a beer in the park when you're supposed to be at work.
    1. Re:Making Dew by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Best. Show. Ever. And the Apple II computer games based on it they let us play were pretty cool too.

    2. Re:Making Dew by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Thank you thank you thank you! Christ, I spent *years* trying to remember the name of that damn show!

    3. Re:Making Dew by no1nose · · Score: 1

      Wow! Thank you for taking me back to 6th grade!! I loved that series!

    4. Re:Making Dew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of remembering things. Did nyone ever have a tandy color computer 3? There was this game I had for it where it was like an rpg. You had one small window for the map. You moved around a village and collected stuff. MAybe you were trying to find some kind of legendary gem or something. I remember there was this one area that was a maze that I could never figure out. I played the game so long I was fighting arch-demons but I was still in the same village. I think when you foguth a monster it was like a MUD where there was a part of the ui where you typed in commands and it would tell you if you hit i, or it hit you.

      Does anyone remember thename of that game? I have searched in vain.

    5. Re:Making Dew by s2theg · · Score: 1

      NO! NEVER CROSS THE STREAMS!

    6. Re:Making Dew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, now we can all go back and remember Ben Affleck before he was a ubiquitous asshole.

    7. Re:Making Dew by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Likewise! Of course, it'll take another 10 years for me to even think of it again, by which time I'll have forgotten. Again.

    8. Re:Making Dew by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      Watched this in 4th grade (way back in '99). Damn, I couldn't remember the name of that show for the life of me.

  4. Maybe by clang_jangle · · Score: 1, Interesting
    From TFA:

    The process begins by spraying seawater into a shallow, black-bottomed pond, where it absorbs heat from the atmosphere. The resulting evaporation increases the concentration of salt in the water from its natural level of 3.5% to as much as 20%. Low-pressure pumps are then used to pipe this concentrated seawater, along with three other streams of untreated seawater, into the desalting unit. As the diagram explains, what Mr Sparrow and Mr Zoshi create by doing this is a type of electrical circuit. Instead of electrons carrying the current, though, it is carried by electrically charged atoms called ions.

    Except for that last absurdly inaccurate statement (made me chuckle), this sounds really good. Not the fastest way to desalinate, so it would take an awful lot of these to meet demand (or one really gigantic one), but still this could be at least a partial solution.

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Instead of electrons carrying the current, though, it is carried by electrically charged atoms called ions."

      Except for that last absurdly inaccurate statement (made me chuckle),

      I don't get it

    2. Re:Maybe by clang_jangle · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't get it.

      The ions are not a substitute for electrons, they're the source. There is no electricity without electrons. :)

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    3. Re:Maybe by jeffstar · · Score: 1

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      TFA says they make fresh water by heating salt water with electricity so why not just heat it mostly with the sun and then a bit of electricity.

      TFA is a bit light on details: why do Na+ ions go to one stream and CL- to the other? Have they got membranes that are impervious to CL- and NA+?

    4. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More precisely ions are a *carrier* of charge (which can be an electron, or the lack of an electron), and the quote said "carry", so there's nothing wrong with it.

    5. Re:Maybe by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Informative

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      TFA is a bit light on details: why do Na+ ions go to one stream and CL- to the other? Have they got membranes that are impervious to CL- and NA+?

      Yes. From TFA:

      Each of the four streams of water is connected to two neighbours by what are known as ion bridges. These are pathways made of polystyrene that has been treated so it will allow the passage of only one sort of ion—either sodium or chloride.

    6. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it

      Don't worry. I don't get it either.
      :)

    7. Re:Maybe by samkass · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dr. Flammond: "A year ago, I was close to perfecting the first magnetic desalinization process. So revolutionary, it was capable of removing the salt from over a million gallons of sea water a day! Do you realise what that could mean to the starving nations of the earth?"

      Nick Rivers: "My God, they'd have enough salt to last forever!"

      --
      E pluribus unum
    8. Re:Maybe by klaun · · Score: 4, Informative

      The ions are not a substitute for electrons, they're the source. There is no electricity without electrons. :)

      Electricity is the flow of charge, not electrons.

      If your statement was accurate, your computer would not work as it depends upon semiconductors which function in part based on the flow of positively charged holes in the electron structure of the material. (see p-n junctions, etc.) The Hall effect can be used to verify the charge of the moving carrier within a current. It can be either positive or negative.

      Note that this desalinization mechanism works very similarly to a fuel-cell which also involves ion flow as part of an electric circuit.

    9. Re:Maybe by clang_jangle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      To say, " Instead of electrons carrying the current, though, it is carried by electrically charged atoms called ions" is inaccurate. The electron stream (which we call electricity) is still an electron stream. It would have been more accurate had they said, " Instead of using wires or cables to carry the current, though, it is carried by electrically charged atoms called ions."

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    10. Re:Maybe by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 1

      Because these 4 "streams" conatin a medium that only allows positivly or negativley charged particle to travel through it depending on what is required.

      --
      quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    11. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Pedantic. Go create current without electrons, publish, then say the satement was "inaccurate".

    12. Re:Maybe by maxfresh · · Score: 1

      For every hole moving in one direction within the semiconductor substrate, is there not a corresponding electron moving in the opposite direction?

    13. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Current is the flow of charge. An electron is a little wagon containing a charge. If you have a fixed wire with wagons rolling in it each carrying a charge, the charge is carried by the wagons, not the wire.

    14. Re:Maybe by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      You just put a roof over it and collect whatever condenses.
      But unless you have a lot of surface area, the water you collect will be negligble in comparison to the main distillation process.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    15. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you wish to frame it that way then saying the charge is carried by ions *instead* of electrons is wildly inaccurate, so I think GP's point stands. Still, "+1 Almost A Car Analogy".

    16. Re:Maybe by AdamHaun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's not inaccurate, unless you're claiming that protons don't have a charge. The ions here are nothing like wires. In a wire, the atoms (nuclei and nonconductive electrons) are fixed in position while the conduction band electrons are free to move from atom to atom. But in this desalinization process, the nuclei themselves actually move -- that's what makes it desalinization. The sodium and chlorine ions are true charge carriers. Ion conduction is not uncommon. Here's some more info on that:

      http://amasci.com/amateur/elecdir.html

      --
      Visit the
    17. Re:Maybe by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that roof interfere with the sun striking the black-bottomed pool?

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    18. Re:Maybe by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, atoms are not ions, which is what the attempt at an article states.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Maybe by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      If it's on Earth, then it is a colder climate. Colder than 100 degrees centigrade. Or as you probably call it, 212 degrees-F.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Maybe by Rei · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, you "just" put a roof over it. As though that wouldn't 10x the construction and maintenance costs of the evaporation ponds. :P

      --
      Look at me, still talking while there's science to do.
    21. Re:Maybe by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't in my terrarium.

    22. Re:Maybe by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      If it's on Earth, then it is a colder climate. Colder than 100 degrees centigrade. Or as you probably call it, 212 degrees-F.

      Exactly. Just get a really long Aluminum pipe for the "waste steam", slightly angle it down, and you've got a water condenser. Run the "waste" pipe next to the input water pipe, and you've got increased efficiency on both heating and cooling.

    23. Re:Maybe by gtbritishskull · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do not know what you are talking about. An ion is an atom (or group of atoms) that have more protons than electrons. Maybe you should spend a few hours on wikipedia boning up on your basic chemistry.

    24. Re:Maybe by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A stream of alpha particles would have a well-defined current, despite the lack of electrons.

    25. Re:Maybe by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      If it's on Earth, then it is a colder climate. Colder than 100 degrees centigrade. Or as you probably call it, 212 degrees-F.

      Very funny, please go read up on "vapor pressure".

      All that's needed to get some condensation is a surface that's colder than the pool, and in the same enclosed area. The trouble is, the rate of condensation and evaporation depends on the temperature differential between the condenser and the pool. So if your ambient temperature is 90 F and your pool is heated to 100 F you won't see very much evaporation compared to if you just exhaust your waste humidity into the (presumably comparatively dry) environment.

    26. Re:Maybe by maxfresh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Be that as it may, atoms are not ions, which is what the attempt at an article states.

      The article doesn't state that atoms are ions. Rather, it states that ions are electrically charged atoms, which is totally correct. Here is the exact quote, in context:

      As the diagram explains, what Mr Sparrow and Mr Zoshi create by doing this is a type of electrical circuit. Instead of electrons carrying the current, though, it is carried by electrically charged atoms called ions.

      Salt is made of two ions: positively charged sodium and negatively charged chloride. These flow in opposite directions around the circuit. Each of the four streams of water is connected to two neighbours by what are known as ion bridges. These are pathways made of polystyrene that has been treated so it will allow the passage of only one sort of ion--either sodium or chloride. Sodium and chloride ions pass out of the concentrated solution to the neighbouring weak ones by diffusion though these bridges (any chemical will diffuse from a high to a low concentration in this way).

      I don't find any incorrect statement in the above quote regarding ions.

    27. Re:Maybe by Avin22 · · Score: 1

      "what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?" I was thinking that might actually be a good idea, with a slight tweak. Instead of collecting the evaporated water as a byproduct of this process, why not combine this with the process of reverse osmosis. One of the major difficulties with reverse osmosis (in addition to the energy requirement) is that it produces a highly concentrated brine that must be disposed of. Instead of dumping it back in the ocean, why not first use it to fuel this type of osmosis as well? That way, the process is not limited by the amount of heat in the environment because it does not need to evaporate any new source of water.

    28. Re:Maybe by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      True. Too bad greenhouses are impossible.

    29. Re:Maybe by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      You do not know what you are talking about. An ion is an atom (or group of atoms) that have more protons than electrons. Maybe you should spend a few hours on wikipedia boning up on your basic chemistry.

      Maybe you should spend some more time on wikipedia.

      There DO NOT need to be more protons than electrons, they just need to be a non-equal quantity so that there is a net charge, making it a negatively OR positively charged atom/molecule.

      Now, what you were saying would be correct if you were referring to cations specifically, which DO have more protons than electrons.

    30. Re:Maybe by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Funny

      (to the music of Queen) - Black-bottomed pool you make the salty ions get found!

      Sorry, couldn't resist

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    31. Re:Maybe by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Current is by definition the flow of charge. In the case of your muscles, there is an electrical current along the muscle cell membrane that is caused by a change in the amount of cations allowed into the cell.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    32. Re:Maybe by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, RO systems still require high pressures to work. That defeats the benefit of this new system, wherein no high pressure system (thereby no steel piping, no expensive pumps) is required.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    33. Re:Maybe by Langolier · · Score: 1

      And what if they let the water vapour, that is lighter than air, rise, and cool off by rising, to the point where it would condense again?
      And if the rising force of the water vapour was used to drive some fans or turbines?

      Or they could just release enough water vapour, letting it rise, so that there would be more precipitation downwind of the site. All of these would
      generate power, and more fresh water, as well.

      --
      Share. Until it becomes uncomfortable. Or at least a little.
    34. Re:Maybe by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      what if they collected the fresh water vapour that is evaporating off the salt water as well?

      Or better yet, collect the billions of gallons of condensate that falls out of the sky every day. Then you don't have to worry about all those silly ions, electrons and membranes.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    35. Re:Maybe by herojig · · Score: 1

      I liked this joke because it points out the futility of desalinization - if the seas are so polluted with bio-hazards that they will make the water unfit for consumption in the first place...all that's left is some dirty salt.

      --
      I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
    36. Re:Maybe by jwdb · · Score: 1

      Nope. For every hole moving through the semiconductor from positive to negative terminal, there's an electron that leaves the positive terminal and a corresponding one that arrives at the negative. You have electron-hole pair creation at the positive terminal and annihilation (through recombination) at the negative, but the holes pass through the semiconductor and the electrons through the rest of the circuit.

    37. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this could be at least a partial solution.

      .. of NaCl?

    38. Re:Maybe by jeffstar · · Score: 1

      come on now, steel pipes aren't THAT expensive...neither are pumps.

    39. Re:Maybe by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this would require active refrigeration unless they're in a colder climate?

      You just put a roof over it and collect whatever condenses.
      But unless you have a lot of surface area, the water you collect will be negligble in comparison to the main distillation process.

      One fractal green house coming up ...

    40. Re:Maybe by Hucko · · Score: 1

      We should release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere! It is a greenhouse gas so it will help us make the earth one big greenhouse! Then everyone will have lots of fresh water! Damn, I need more exclamation points to qualify...

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    41. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My chemistry teacher used to tell us that cations are pussytive. I still remember that nearly 20 years later - never underestimate the power of a bad pun!

    42. Re:Maybe by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Meant to say different number of protons than electrons. Quick posts lead to stupid mistakes. My point still stands, though. The article used the term "ion" correctly.

  5. Anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone else think this looks suspiciously like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion

    1. Re:Anyone else think... by buchner.johannes · · Score: 0

      Exactly. They built a perpetuum mobile that requires less than 1 kWh.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:Anyone else think... by bcmm · · Score: 5, Informative

      anyone else think this looks suspiciously like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion

      Yeah, pretty much, for all practical purposes, but not quite, because sooner or later the fucking sun will in fact burn out.

      You didn't need to read TFA. It's in the summary. Second sentence.

      Saltworks uses solar energy or waste heat

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:Anyone else think... by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Not really. The article clearly indicates that heat input is required (i.e. it doesn't purport to be a system that produces more energy than is put into it). The beauty of this system is that this energy is obtained from a source we don't have to pay for (i.e., the sun).

    4. Re:Anyone else think... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Other than the fact that they are consuming not producing energy, yeah exactly like that...

    5. Re:Anyone else think... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, pretty much, for all practical purposes, but not quite, because sooner or later the fucking sun will in fact burn out.

      Or get bought out by Oracle after giving away all its energy for Free.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Anyone else think... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      anyone else think this looks suspiciously like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion

      Only if you can't read.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    7. Re:Anyone else think... by tehdaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      An appropriate link: The Last Question

      T

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    8. Re:Anyone else think... by Ironchew · · Score: 1

      There ain't no such thing as a free Sun.
      I feel like a single-celled organism subsisting on a decomposing lunch for only a few seconds.

    9. Re:Anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, pretty much, for all practical purposes, but not quite, because sooner or later the fucking sun will in fact burn out.

      LOLLLL

    10. Re:Anyone else think... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      (i.e. it doesn't purport to be a system that produces more energy than is put into it)

            "Perpetual motion" doesn't produce necessarily "more" energy than is put into it. It simply doesn't require energy at all apart from the initial "push". And that is, of course, absolute rubbish, thanks to friction, diminishing returns, and any other number of physical laws that favor entropy.

            I just don't understand how this project is meant to work. Maintaining those "concentration gradients" is going to take more energy than just sunlight. Yes you could vary the volumes of the "pools" (and thus the amount of evaporation) to help maintain your concentrations within a given range. However eventually you are going to have to flush the whole system and start again, since it will always tend towards equilibrium. And if you started with salt water, equilibrium is NOT fresh water.

            Human kidneys (something I know about as a doctor), for example, use salinity gradients to concentrate urine and also remove necessary salts - after all you don't want to be literally pissing all of your sodium, potassium and calcium away without SOME sort of control. However this control requires energy, in the form of ATP, and LOTS of it. This is one reason the kidneys are one of the most sensitive organs to oxygen deprivation, after the brain and the heart (but even heart muscle can take a beating - the problem there is more one of inadequate blood supply rather than oxygen demand) - even though the kidneys receive 20% of the body's blood flow. They NEED it to survive, because they consume tremendous amounts of oxygen to produce enough ATP to maintain all those gradients.

            Frankly I think the article is badly written - probably intentionally especially if the inventors "think they're on to something" - and I fail to understand how it works on a fundamental level. But kudos to them if they're right. I guess we'll find out how it really worked in a few years. Or not.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Anyone else think... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      I was thinking, "In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"

    12. Re:Anyone else think... by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Seems pretty simple to me. The ions flow down their concentration gradients creating opposite charges in streams that were once regular seawater, through some sort of bridge that only allows Cl ions into one stream and Na ions into the other stream. Then the seawater that needs to be desalinized is connected, the ions can't escape the charged streams due to their bridges, but the ions from the seawater to be desalinized travel to the charged streams. After that, you dump the charged streams and start over again. About the only thing I'm not sure on is the last part, as I imagine the ions would flow due to the charge and not be permitted to flow due to their concentration gradient due to the nature of the bridges?

      Anyway, the first part certainly is simple enough to understand from a physiology perspective. Hell, thats how the action potential works. Create an imbalance using energy(ATP in the body, sunlight in this example) and then use semipermeable membranes to create a charge.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    13. Re:Anyone else think... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yes I got THAT part. What I don't get is how they plan on maintaining this potential difference across the membrane. In the human body it's done by Na/K ATPase pumps that trade 2 sodium atoms for 1 potassium atom. But these pumps are working all the time (even during depolarization, when the Na gates open), and consuming ATP all the time. It's ACTIVE transport, and requires a lot of energy. That's why neurons die when deprived of oxygen after only 4 minutes, while other tissues can survive hours.

      I find it hard to understand that this phenomenon will just "happen" by itself under bright sunlight. There's diminishing returns to consider. As you start moving ions out of your brine and combining them with the fluids on either side, through diffusion gradients or electrical gradients, the difference in concentration/charge will decrease and an equilibrium is reached. And as I stated before, I doubt that that point will result in "fresh" water. Oh I can see "less salty" water, but not fresh water. Now if I take that less salty water and repeat the process n times, perhaps I could get relatively fresh water - but how many times does the system have to be flushed or reset, and who's counting all the energy required to do this?

            Like I said, the article is vague. There's no numbers to run. Maybe it works, and good for them. But I doubt it's a miraculous process - just slightly more energy efficient.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:Anyone else think... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Your body has to pump the salt because it's going from a low concentration gradient (blood) to a high concentration gradient (urine). Obviously. This is just the opposite. In each side, one ion is going down a *major* concentration gradient (20% to 3.5%), while the other ion is going up a *minor* concentration gradient (0% to 3.5%). So entropy favors the reaction, and it will continue until the ions run out from the freshwater; you're ending in both a lower entropy and energy state. The key is that you have to create that major concentration gradient (20%), which is a lower entropy state. That's done through evaporation.

      The advantage of this process over evaporating it and condensing it (say, with a transparent roof) is building and maintaining a pond with a transparent roof costs about 10x more than building and maintaining an empty pond. Glass costs a fortune and can be damaged. Plastic is cheaper, but it has to be thick enough to withstand the elements and it photodegrades, meaning it has to be replaced every several years.

      --
      Look at me, still talking while there's science to do.
  6. It's probably the wave of the future (pun intended by Amester · · Score: 1

    Desalinization is most likely the wave of the future, given the rise in sea levels and melting ice. We might as well put the extra water to good use, rather than just let our low-lying lands drown.

  7. If by "clever new approach" you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what all flora has been doing forever.

  8. I'll get modded off topic.... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But it was kinda funny, right above the article title was a statement on how to filter firehose.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
  9. Vancouver saves the world? by Yergle143 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK between this and the General Fusion guys http://www.generalfusion.com/ Canada has got water and energy completely licked. http://www.saltworkstech.com/ OK actually I'm still trying to run the numbers on the both of them (and waiting for some peer reviewed publications.)

    1. Re:Vancouver saves the world? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      If you have the first one, the second one becomes redundant. Loads of problems just go away if you have cheap, abundant, clean energy.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Vancouver saves the world? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If it's too cheap and abundant, the whole earth might start to glow due to waste heat. People would be using lots of energy and having to pumping the waste heat skywards.

      But most people might be on space colonies before that scenario becomes likely.

      --
    3. Re:Vancouver saves the world? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But most people might be on space colonies before that scenario becomes likely.

      If we're lucky it might stave off the next Ice Age, due to begin this millennium. Then we have 10,000 years to figure the rest out.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. simpler way to get fresh water by goombah99 · · Score: 0

    1) use the sun to create sea salt.
    2) sell it
    3) buy fresh water.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Re:Real Question - Please Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the word "nigger" actually personally offend you? Or do you avoid it and frown on its use because you feel like you're supposed to? Real question, and maybe as an AC you can give a truly honest answer.

    The word doesn't offend me. I avoid it because I realize that others may be offended by it, and I do not understand the complex history of its word. Besides, there are plenty of other ways to refer to other human beings besides the color of their skin. Consider their first and last name, for instance.

  13. ion bridges cost? Consumable? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The key piece of the work is an ion bridge. This has to permit the travel of one kind of ion but not the other, i.e. Na+ or Cl-. Looks like this material could be expensive. It might plug up need to be periodically replaced. How expensive these are? How non toxic these are? What is needed to manufacture them? These are the questions we need to ask.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by Vesvvi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More important than the cost is the question of effectiveness.

      In their diagram, they have this schematic in the critical location:

      [Salt water]<----(+)----[Brine]----(-)----->[Salt water]

      Chemically, that "equation" just doesn't balance without an input of energy.  It doesn't matter what kind of "ion bridges" they put into place between the brine and salt water reservoirs, or what the concentration of salt exists in the brine or salt water, it will require some energy to offset the entropy increase.

      It's possible that they have some active system in place in the bridges, but it's going to take some kind of energy input which is missing from their explanation.

    2. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by klaun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chemically, that "equation" just doesn't balance without an input of energy.

      The energy was input by the sun before the different solutions were brought together.

      it will require some energy to offset the entropy increase

      delta S > 0 for a closed system as a consequence of the second law of the thermodynamics. No need for additional energy. The entropy of a the concentrated solution is less than the entropy of the dilute solution, hence dilution happens spontaneously, much like osmosis.

    3. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      The energy comes from the Sun. The concentrated brine has higher mobility ions. Even if ion bridge allows ions to move in both directions, the higher concentration on one side will send more ions down to lower concentration side purely by diffusion. At some point the concentrations should equal and the flow should stop but the low pressure pumps keep pumping out the water with altered concentrations and keep the ion gradient active all the time.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The brine is created from a portion of the sea water. They use the sun to heat it and evaporate some of the H2O. This is the primary energy input.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by whit3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      More important than the cost is the question of effectiveness.

      In their diagram, they have this schematic in the critical location:

      [Salt water]<----(+)----[Brine]----(-)----->[Salt water]

      Chemically, that "equation" just doesn't balance without an input of energy.

      The article DOES explain this, the salt imbalance makes
      a kind of battery.

      It's brilliant! Solar energy concentrates a brine, which
      then (just as dissimilar metals make a thermocouple)
      causes current and builds an electric potential
      when connected via a membrane (impermeable
      except to Na+ ions) to a less-concentrated brine.

      So, the difference in concentration of ions between two
      channels results in a diffusion from more-concentrated to
      less-concentrated, OF A CHARGED ION. That means
      electric current flows, until the charge buildup raises
      the electric potential enough to stop the diffusion.

      The solar input concentrates the brine, the resulting
      (small) voltage then is electrically applied to the to-be-desalinated
      channel, and (in the absence of a concentration difference)
      the electric field causes the ions to leave the
      to-be-desalinated stream.

      Thus, it's a solar-concentration-of-salt that makes
      the desalination occur. The electricity caused by the
      diffusion is active ALL NIGHT until the concentration
      of salt goes down, so the concentrated brine is
      an effective load-leveling device for the whole plant.

      The 'electric input' part of the process is entirely for
      pumping the brines around, so it can be a small fraction
      of the brute-force desalination energy requirement.
      Heck, you could use wave or wind power for that.

      Solar collectors for this kind of gizmo are just open-air
      trays of brine. Can't get any more cost-effective than
      THAT.

    6. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the other side of the reaction. It is charge neutral because the +/- charges in the two side pools are then balanced with -/+ charges from the water to be desalinated.

      The charges flow apart in the first place because the central pool is highly concentrated - so it contains far more + and - charges than anything else in the system.

      This kind of approach would never yield completely drinkable water, but that isn't the point. The goal is to get rid of a lot of the ion load before using more expensive processes to get rid of the rest.

      Desalination is a marvel of process optimization. Multiple stages of purification are used - each one being more expensive than the last but more effective. The early steps get rid of a huge mass of dissolved matter for dirt cheap, so even if their product isn't drinkable it GREATLY reduced the cost of the later stages.

      If you don't care about cost then desalination is trivially easy. Just run any kind of water you like through a H+ exchange resin followed by an OH- exchange resin, and then run it trough activated charcoal. The resulting water will be as clean as clean can be and the system would be remarkably simple. The catch is that those resins cost a small fortune to make, and if you run seawater into them then they're probably going to last all of 5 minutes. It might be a good approach for a camper to use to obtain water (the resin is a lot lighter than the amount of water that it could clean), but it is not a cost-effective method overall. Also - the purity it would achieve would be massive overkill. This is drinking water - we're not manufacturing CPUs.

    7. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The key piece of the work is an ion bridge.

      No, the key piece of work is the idea. Ion bridges have been around forever.

      This has to permit the travel of one kind of ion but not the other, i.e. Na+ or Cl-. Looks like this material could be expensive.

      So you use, for instance, a polymer electrolyte (ionomer) with negatively charged side-chains for one bridge and a polymer with positively charged side-chains on the other. Only the counterions are mobile. The article says they're using modified polystyrene. This is not new, or terribly expensive. Similar things are already being used in industrial desalination technology for ion exchange columns.

      It might plug up need to be periodically replaced.

      Plug up with what? You naturally would have a mechanical filter to keep the crap out. It's not a major problem.

      How expensive these are? How non toxic these are? What is needed to manufacture them? These are the questions we need to ask.

      No, they're the questions asked by someone who doesn't know s--t about chemistry/chemical engineering. I happen to have a degree in the subject, but damnit, I learned about (used, even) polymer ion exchange columns in high school. If you want answers to your questions, go get Coulson & Richardson or some other chemical engineering textbook, and find the relevant section.
      This technology is certainly very clever, but it does not make use of any new technology. The only question I think is worth asking here is whether or not it turns out to be more efficient or not.

    8. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 3, Informative

      [Salt water]<----(+)----[Brine]----(-)----->[Salt water]

      Chemically, that "equation" just doesn't balance without an input of energy. It doesn't matter what kind of "ion bridges" they put into place between the brine and salt water reservoirs, or what the concentration of salt exists in the brine or salt water, it will require some energy to offset the entropy increase.

      This is exactly backwards; energy input is required in order to decrease entropy of (part of) a system. Entropy increases come for free. Consider if you fill one half of a fish tank with fresh water and the other half with brine, do you get a fish tank full of somewhat salty water or do the fresh and salt water separate out?

    9. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by lawpoop · · Score: 0

      The only question I think is worth asking here is whether or not it turns out to be more efficient or not.

      I detect a little unnecessary redundancy there.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not everyone reading Slashdot has a degree in chemistry or chemical engineering. I appreciated OP's questions since I had the same ones. I appreciate your answers but not the attitude that I had to endure when reading your post.

      Plug up with what? You naturally would have a mechanical filter to keep the crap out. It's not a major problem.

      You answered the dumb question but failed to answer the smarter one. Does the ion bridge ever somehow lose its effectiveness after a good amount of use? If it does, it will need to be replaced. How often does this happen? How much water can one of them desalinate before needing replacement? If it never needs replacement because of *use* (not mechanical crap getting in the way), then that's great, but I don't know the answer. Again, I do not have a degree in any of this stuff, so please enlighten me.

    11. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by nutshell42 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not everyone reading Slashdot has a degree in chemistry or chemical engineering. I appreciated OP's questions since I had the same ones. I appreciate your answers but not the attitude that I had to endure when reading your post.

      The attitude of the GP was the problem. "These are the questions we need to ask", as if they were non-obvious and revolutionary. Whenever there is a post about an invention on /. the easiest way to get "+5 (Group-Wank)" is to write that it will never work because the inventors overlooked an issue a drunk chimpanzee could come up with. Then a thread ensues where everyone congratulates themselves on saving the world yet again.

      You are right, the GP's questions were interesting and should have been answered in the article (which is for laypersons) and because they weren't it's good that someone answered them here on /.

      The problem is that the GP posed the question in a way that implied he knew what he was talking about and was making a statement about the invention, instead of admitting that he had no idea and was asking for clarification. jm2c

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    12. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water does not need to be salt-free to be sustainably drinkable, it just needs to be less salty than the most concetrated urine that humans can produce.

    13. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chemically, that "equation" just doesn't balance without an input of energy.

      The energy was input by the sun before the different solutions were brought together.

      it will require some energy to offset the entropy increase

      delta S > 0 for a closed system as a consequence of the second law of the thermodynamics. No need for additional energy. The entropy of a the concentrated solution is less than the entropy of the dilute solution, hence dilution happens spontaneously, much like osmosis.

      First, the energy input occurring prior to the steps I diagrammed doesn't matter. That provides the brine, but it has no bearing on what will happen once the brine, and the two saltwater streams, are present.

      Second, I may have been totally off-base on the entropy issues. It certainly matters, but it might not really be critical to the issues at hand. I was a bit preoccupied by the fact that the entropy endpoint of the proposed scheme is less than an equilibrium situation. However, that endpoint does have higher entropy than the starting condition, so it's still a viable condition.

      What really catches my attention is that the ion bridges must use technology which is unknown to me, despite having two degrees in chemistry. It's not possible to build a passive filtering system which will separate chlorine and sodium. Some people below me have suggested an ion exchange resin (and modified +5), but they are also incorrect. Ion exchange resins are intrinsically charged, either positive or negative, initially: let's say positive. In practice, this column would bind negative materials. But if you want to get those negative ions off, you have to flush it off with something else even more strongly negative. Alternatively, you might be able to change the pH to alter the intrinsic charge on the column (switching it from positive to negative, and thus repelling the bound negative material).

      But either way, you have to regenerate the column, which is inefficient and energetically expensive. Think of home water softeners, which cannot just remove calcium and magnesium, but instead replace it with sodium and potassium. And you still have to recharge them.

      The only way I can think of to make a scheme like this work is to use a symporter membrane pump which moves two sodium along with one chlorine, simultaneously, in the same direction. I don't know that such a thing exists, and it sure isn't anything than be done as just a tube or a free-flowing porous matrix.

    14. Re:ion bridges cost? Consumable? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This technology is certainly very clever, but it does not make use of any new technology. The only question I think is worth asking here is whether or not it turns out to be more efficient or not.

      If it's miniaturizable technology and sturdy enough to be permanently mounted on the deck of a ship unlike this then I think it's got a future.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. General Confusion by epine · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thank you for that link to General Confusion. Made my day. Check out the freshman T-rex with his lava lamp and the sordid diatripe:

    http://www.generalfusion.com/fossil_fuel_crisis.php

    The planet was covered with dense clouds and the atmosphere contained a high concentration of carbon dioxide, producing tropical conditions north of the 45th parallel. For example, many dinosaur fossils were excavated in Alberta, Canada. As the earth's crust cooled down, volcanic activity reduced.

    Riddle of Burgess Shale's fossil-rich deposits solved

    The site, close to the B.C.-Alberta border, is considered crucial to understanding the so-called Cambrian "explosion" of life - a time when the future Canadian land mass was drifting in tropical climes close to the Earth's equator.

    In my historical atlas, the equator is considerably south of the 45th latitude. The dinosaur fossils in Alberta are equatorial in origin. But hey, if you can't get that right, no obstacle to solving the fusion problem. Like it's not a hard problem or anything. The typical Alberta fat cat oilman probably doesn't believe in plate tectonics to begin with. Just a bunch of mud we turn into money. Now they're all excited about version 2: just a bunch of water we turn into money.

    BTW, the Royal Tyrrell Museum in the Alberta badlands is pretty kick-ass if you're into bones.

    1. Re:General Confusion by Interoperable · · Score: 2

      I'm fairly certain that the oil industry has a particularly good understanding of plate tectonics; the term "fossil fuels" isn't lost on them.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    2. Re:General Confusion by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      You're right that the equator is considerably south of the 45th parallel. However, you forget that continents move around, given enough time. So in the Cambrian North America (Laurentia) was near the equator - here's a map. Fast forward 320 million years to when the dinosaurs began to rule the earth, and North America is approaching where it is today - here's another map. Note how Alberta is approaching the 45th parallel, where it is found in your atlas.

      You need to get yourself a different atlas if you're going to think about things that happen over geologic timescales.

    3. Re:General Confusion by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      Hey man, they have patents pending. Therefore the technology must be solid. Write them a check now before it's too late!

  15. Re:Real Question - Please Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does not, because thankfully I'm not one.

  16. Sounds Like Forward Osmosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Forward Osmosis.

    This it by no means a new technology or method.

  17. Economist, not physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The process begins by spraying seawater into a shallow, black-bottomed pond, where it absorbs heat from the atmosphere." ...
    "All the rest of the energy has come free, via the air, from the sun."

    I don't think solar radiation works the way The Economist thinks it does.
    "The air" is cooling it off, not heating it. For that, you need something like a black-bottomed pond to absorb heat from solar radiation..

  18. Re:It's probably the wave of the future (pun inten by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Funny

    And we could freeze a bunch of it and ship it to the poles.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  19. Maxwell's Demon by andrewagill · · Score: 1

    From the way they describe it, it sounds a lot like Maxwell's Demon. Since there is energy going into the system, however, it's clearly not that.

  20. Re:Real Question - Please Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?

  21. Re:Sounds a lot like forward osmosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know conventional desal plants produce lots of concentrated brine? If they could stripe the ionic difference out of this wase product, they would.

    Reverse osmosis has a special filter.
    OK here we have something called a 'Bridge' - same thing.
    Forward / Reverse - depends which side - blowing or sucking.

    You can flow water over such filters, BUT miserable output - you need pressure and emergy - lots of it to get water.

    I think you can make a salt/brine battery from the ponds - but back of envelope calculations would reveal minimal energy contribution at end of day.

       

  22. Reverse osmosis? by macraig · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Isn't this a large-scale demonstration of the same principle used in home reverse-osmosis systems? It sure sounds familiar.

    1. Re:Reverse osmosis? by stevelinton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. It does look a bit similar but it isn't. In reverse osmosis the water has to pass through the membrane, driven by high pressure pumps, leaving its impurities behind.

      In this version the impurities pass through the membrane (two separate membranes in fact) driven by an electrical current. Cleverly, the electrical current itself is generated by the salt passing through other membranes out of the highly concentrated brine that you made in your solar ponds.

    2. Re:Reverse osmosis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to point this out, but in reverse osmosis the impurities pass through the membrane, not the water. You are correct in that the pressure is the determining factor where in the article, presumably, it's electricity.

  23. One thing I've been wondering about for a while... by Entropius · · Score: 1

    ... is if it would be possible to combine solar-thermal power generation with desalination.

    Build Fresnel-lens solar concentrators and stick them near a source of seawater. Boil the water using the sunlight, and use it as the working fluid in an ordinary steam-turbine-type power generator. But instead of recycling the same water once the steam recondenses, realize that you've just made a giant distiller: drink the water and use "new" seawater.

  24. But what happens to the waste steam from the brine by upuv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So I read the thing.

    The process concentrates sea water to brine by an evaporation method. So why waste this low grade stream it is still has high in moisture content. There is already a condenser in this system. I'm thinking this can somehow boost output of clean water.

  25. Re:Real Question - Please Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does the word "nigger" actually personally offend you? Or do you avoid it and frown on its use because you feel like you're supposed to? Real question, and maybe as an AC you can give a truly honest answer.

    The word doesn't offend me. I avoid it because I realize that others may be offended by it, and I do not understand the complex history of its word. Besides, there are plenty of other ways to refer to other human beings besides the color of their skin. Consider their first and last name, for instance.

    It's also,important to remember that it does not have to denote a race or skin color. I tend to evaluate people based on their actions, and I have learned that the epithet could be applied to many of the people that post flamebait as AC. You are what you do, this is your hood, and your question is just some more mostly worthless graffiti. I say mostly worthless because it DOES show YOUR true color, no matter your race.

  26. Re:One thing I've been wondering about for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad salt water has a higher boiling point... it's easier to use a closed loop with pure water.

  27. Why would the Poles want more ice? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Funny

    The winter in Poland is already plenty cold enough...

    :-P

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  28. Old idea, misrepresented, tried and failed by rkinch · · Score: 1

    This idea of ion bridges has been around a long time. The application here is basically misrepresented. All it is doing is replacing a small amount of commercial electric power with solar-generated potentials. But the process isn't feasible when run on commercial power, even if the power is free, so replacing the commercial power with solar (the germ of the "idea" here) is just disguising the dead horse. Reminds me of the algae gambit: the solar constant crossed by photosynthesis is dismal, so no biofuel (corn ethanol, biodiesel, etc) can possibly be effective, but if you photosynthesize with algae, the very irony of pond scum making something useful is enough to make you (briefly) forget physical limits. Notional fantasies vs genuine engineering.

  29. Energy from salinity gradients by XNormal · · Score: 1

    Just like it takes energy to desalinate water the opposite is also true: energy can be produced from salinating water.
    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power

    What this system does is to concentrate seawater by evaporation and then use the salinity gradient between that concentrated brine and normal seawater to produce energy. This energy is then used to desalinate another stream of seawater. In principle, there is no reason to use this energy specifically for desalination. It could also be fed to the grid.

    Is there anything inherently more efficient in using energy derived from osmotic power for desalination compared to using electricity from any other source? The answer to this question will probably determine whether this process can have any real benefits over the alternatives.

    One potential advantage is that this system uses only ion flows and not electron flows. AFAIU, using electricity would have resulted in unwanted electrolysis byproducts which this system elegantly avoids. There is also no need for any power conversion circuits, wires, etc.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  30. Re:It's probably the wave of the future (pun inten by daveime · · Score: 1

    Ice displaces water, which will just make the sea level even higher, you bloody fool !

  31. Question about desalination. by arcade · · Score: 1

    I've long wondered about a few things when it comes to desalination, desert areas etc.

    If it's cheap to make water with this process and remove the salt - would it be a good idea to create a huge bunch of these machines in desert-areas, pumping desalinated water into fields to promote vegetation to grow, fighting back the desert? I would think this wouldn't require the water to be further cleaned, after removing the salts..

    Am I completely off my rockers, or is it a maybe-sort-of workable idea?

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  32. Powered by Evaporation by tomhath · · Score: 1
    This process depends on evaporation to concentrate the brine. Can someone more familiar with the process costs explain why it's cheaper to use ion exchange rather than distilling the water that was evaporated?

    The source of the energy to evaporate the water is irrelevant, solar works just as well for either process. Assuming an essentially unlimited supply of seawater for cooling to the distillation step, I don't see how they can make enough concentrated brine to filter the seawater more cheaply.

  33. Re:But what happens to the waste steam from the br by tsotha · · Score: 1

    I think the answer is cost. Near where I live a company makes table salt. They have acres and acres of these shallow ponds, and when the tide comes in they open the valves, filling up the ponds. Then they close the valves and wait for a few days for it all to dry into this muddy slush that gets scooped up by heavy machinery and, I hope, purified.

    Aside from the land itself the entire operation is so cheap it's almost free. Sure, you could somehow trap that water vapor and cool it enough to change it back to a liquid, but the increase in cost would be enormous on a percentage basis.

  34. Re:It's probably the wave of the future (pun inten by Hucko · · Score: 1

    Well... Then we'll stack it up on the continents!

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  35. Offtopic by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

    i'm curious about your sig - what does it mean? I can't quite figure it out...

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    1. Re:Offtopic by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      "True believer" is often used as a derogatory term for a person whose beliefs are fixed beyond all reason. Some people who claim to be open-minded throw the phrase around very recklessly. I feel that this is arrogant. Discovering new facts using rigorous methodologies is difficult and time-consuming. Everyone uses heuristics most of the time -- hearsay, incomplete evidence, confirmation bias, etc. IMHO, to wildly criticize others (especially when it's millions of people you've never met) for not wanting to change their core beliefs based on the opinions of random strangers shows a lack of humility, self-consciousness, and reason. Furthermore, such critics rarely have well-grounded beliefs themselves. These are the supposed characteristics of true believers, hence my paradoxical joke that only true believers believe in true believers.

      --
      Visit the
  36. Re:One thing I've been wondering about for a while by MacTenchi · · Score: 1

    Not an expert, but from what I've seen (on shows like World's Toughest Fixes, etc.), modern steam turbines are very sensitive to impurities. Even the size of water droplets matters. Running seawater vapor through one would probably not work without a redesign.