X11 Chrome Reportedly Outperforms Windows and Mac Versions
An anonymous reader writes "In a curious contrast to conventional wisdom, there are reports of X11 Chromium being faster than Windows or Mac versions. In the thread titled 'Why is Linux Chrome so fast?,' a developer speculates that it is due to the use of X11 capabilities: 'On X-windows [sic], the renderer backingstores are managed by the X server, and the transport DIBs are also managed by the X server. So, we avoid a lot of memcpy costs incurred on Windows due to keeping the backingstores in main memory there.' Has the design of X11 withstood the test of time better than people tend to give it credit for?"
"Has the design of X11 withstood the test of time better than people tend to give it credit for?"
Yes of course it has. X11 is great and anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't understand it properly, or have an accurate idea of what it's genuine problems are actually due to.
So you are saying it is not X11 that is slow but Linux... Oh man you are taking it out of the frying pan and into the fire.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Give the guy a break. He's only trying to create synergy among web-enabled paradigms.
A Qt build of chromium exists, and is normally known as "konqueror".
Really? I thought he was trying to leverage the cloud architecture to optimize his software services enterprise based on open standards.
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.