Slashdot Mirror


Dell Rugged Laptops Not Quite Tough Enough

An anonymous reader writes "Trusted Reviews has put the new Dell XFR rugged laptop through the grinder and it hasn't fared as well as expected. Considering that these guys drove a car over a Panasonic Toughbook, they went pretty easy on the Dell, but it still couldn't take the punishment. It looks like Dell still has a way to go to steal the ball from Panasonic when it comes to all terrain computing."

47 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the Dell blends after all!

  2. Does anyone use these? by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen Panasonic Toughbooks in police cars, fire trucks, and in the vehicles of industrial companies, but I guess I don't get why; the laptops are well protected in the car or truck, and it's not like a cop is going to use it as a shield in a shoot out, or a fireman is going to be typing something inside a burning building. When a plumber came over to fix some pipes, he brought with him a battered Compaq laptop that was missing several keys, looked like it'd gone through hell, but was still working and wasn't "ruggedized" in any way I could tell.

    This is pure ignorance on my part...I can appreciate there is very likely a need, or they wouldn't make them, but I really don't know what that need is; especially, under what circumstances would it be possible to get my laptop run over by a truck as part of a normal day?

    That said, they definitely *look* cool and wouldn't mind having one myself, especially if I thought I'd need to check my email outside, in a snowstorm, in the Sierra Madre. :)

    1. Re:Does anyone use these? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think of it as laptop insurance. Just in case. Maybe you won't need it, but maybe you will. Also probably cheaper to pay the ToughBook premium than replacing your laptop a year earlier.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Does anyone use these? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two possibilities: One is that, through some mixture of poor prediction and being oversold, those users bought the wrong hardware. Just as many people buy "laptops" that end up spending their lives on a desk, essentially never moved, these laptops could well have been purchased to survive the Rigors of a Crime Scene; but then plunked into car mounts and not moved since. Not necessarily good planning; but a hugely common, and fairly understandable, mistake made by all sorts of individuals and organizations.

      Second possibility is that the Toughbooks you saw were the semi-rugged versions, which are much closer in price(and durability) to basic business laptops than to their fully rugged brethren. Paying a modest premium for semi-rugged features(keyboard that'll survive coffee and donut crumbs for several years, screen that'll survive the big mean keyring falling off the dash onto it, and so forth) might well be entirely sensible even if paying the substantial premium for the fully-rugged can-be-used-underwater-even-if-there-are-sharks-with-lasers edition isn't.

    3. Re:Does anyone use these? by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While they're not your every day laptop, there are some people out there who have a use for them. Once, while working in a computer repair shop back in 2002, a customer came in with a very battered old Toughbook. As it turned out, it really had been through a warzone, as he'd been a journalist in Afghanistan during the invasion and it'd been his companion for the last year or two.

      Despite its appearance, the hardware was working perfectly - more than can be said for the Windows install on it.

    4. Re:Does anyone use these? by semargofni · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coffee crumbs?

    5. Re:Does anyone use these? by fwice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At my job, we use these toughbooks in extreme conditions -- think arctic/antarctic desert and Middle Eastern deserts. Especially in the latter, the toughbook excels because all of the ports are blocked against FOD [foreign objects and debris] -- namely, if there's a sandstorm that kicks up, the sand can't enter the unit in any way.

      In addition, try using a regular laptop while riding on a humvee through rocky terrain. No way that disk lasts, whereas the toughbook disks are made to absorb the shock and vibration.

    6. Re:Does anyone use these? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would add that those that say you don't need a Toughbook for "just being mounted in the police car" has never actually been in a ride along. I have a HS buddy that was a county cop for several years and the amount of abuse and beating you get in those cars chasing a bad guy is just unreal.

      Lets not forget that trying to evade the law many bad guys will try to make their own roads, cut through ditches, medians, etc and the amount of beating and bouncing around you get in a police car during a chase is just nuts. I doubt a standard Dell would survive very long with the amount of beating you get in a police car.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  3. Did the submitter even RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Er, what? This Slashdot summary does not jive with the article at all. The laptop was perfectly functional after all of their tests. The only problems they had were a minor cosmetic issue of the adhesive coming off around the trackpad (which they just called "fit and finish") and that some of the doors might pop open during drops since they weren't double locked. Their conclusion was that it was indeed quite rugged.

    1. Re:Did the submitter even RTFA? by Shag · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did *you* RTFA? They stated quite clearly that the Dell had issues with water ingress, including water getting into a battery compartment that isn't isolated from the mainboard.

      Yes, it worked again after they let it dry out for a day... but that's bad.

      I volunteer somewhere that bought one of these Dells, and honestly I have no idea why they needed a ruggedized laptop.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  4. Re:Interesting... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Entirely context dependent. Their testing would be excessive if it were performed on an ordinary "it'd be nice if it survives the daily grind for a few years, and not feeling like cheap plastic crap is always a bonus; but no actual claims are made" laptop. Yours is one of those.

    However, this is the special OMG-MIL-SPEC, super durable, extra rugged, no-expense-spared model. If Dell wants to sell a machine in that segment, this sort of testing is perfectly appropriate.

  5. In my case, temperature tolerance... by moosehooey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A regular laptop won't start up at -40 after a North Dakota night. The toughbook says "Please wait, warming up" on the BIOS screen while it pre-warms the hard drive. It also works just fine when it's baking in the sun at 150, whereas the old Dell I had would crash at those temperatures.

    1. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Kagato · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's pretty much spot on. They need the hardware to work in temperature extremes. And even then I would assume they would by the semi-rugged model. The Panasonic Toughbook is a great machine. They still make them by hand in Kyoto. Panasonic doesn't trust the quality of factories in other parts of Asia, part of the price premium means you're getting a laptop built by a highly skilled workforce with a keen eye on tolerances.

    2. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by koxkoxkox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you have a right to use an idiosyncratic unit of temperature, but please at least specify it, ok ?

    3. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

      My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.

      It was a particularly cold winter, and we were already down to 3 Kevins (due to their low popularity at the time).

      Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather. 2 Kevins left.

      Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift. I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us. "It's Lemmer. He's in bad shape. Drove right into the fucking ditch." We called the time of death at 6:15 PM.

      At 6:16, all eyes turned to room 2217. Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia. His family being Catholic, he had already been given his last rights. If he couldn't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned, we would be at zero Kevins. Sure, we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins, but they're just not the same.

      It was 7:15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance. "She's not due for 2 weeks!", James exclaimed. As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled, they exchanged darting glances with each other. This was their first child, and they wanted to keep the baby's sex a secret. Of course, in a small town, secrets don't get kept. Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.

      The delivery was routine, and Kevin Brooks was born healthy, if a tad underweight, at 10:52 PM. Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10:54.

      It was, as they say, a close one. Kevin Thomas arrived two days later, the weather having finally cleared up. To this day, we still rib him about it.

      Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins.

    4. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's fair to assume that if he didn't specify a unit then he's the kind of person who isn't aware of more than one unit.

      So, Fahrenheit it is.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:In my case, temperature tolerance... by DrWho520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...part of the price premium means you're getting a laptop built by a highly skilled workforce with a keen eye on tolerances.

      Were it not that we had to pay a premium for this...

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  6. Laptops should be able to defend themselves by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Laptops are weak. They should be able to defend themselves against dangers such as smashing into the ground, like this experimental Lenovo model.

    --
    "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
  7. Notsotoughbooks by juanhf · · Score: 4, Informative

    We used to believe that the ToughBooks were the end all be all of ruggedized computers; that is until the day someone actually managed to break one!

    If you read the warranty statement from Panasonic you will see the following under Section 3 - Limited Warranty Exclusions

    "Failures which result from alteration, accident, misuse, introduction of liquid or other foreign matter into the unit, abuse, neglect, installation, maladjustment of consumer controls, improper maintenance or modification, use not in accordance with product use instructions"

    That means that if your coffee somehow spills on the laptop and fries the motherboard Panasonic will not repair it under warranty!

    On the other hand if you purchase a Dell or an HP ruggedized notebook with the accidental damage protection the notebook will be repaired with no questions asked.

    Considering the cost of the Panasonic ToughBooks, I would take a Dell XFR + CompleteCare any day!

    Besides, regardless of what notebook you own, if you roll over it with your vehicle (by accident) and it happens to break, would you not rather be covered?

    1. Re:Notsotoughbooks by Kagato · · Score: 2, Informative

      Panasonic, just like Dell and HP, has an accidental damage plan.

      Consider this. What's worth more the laptop or the data on the laptop? You're in a rugged location, you're off the grid and can't back up your data until you get back to civilization, which laptop would you want? I'm going to opt for the one that doesn't let moisture seep inside.

    2. Re:Notsotoughbooks by darkmayo · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are comparing a base limited warranty with an ADP warranty, apples an oranges.

      Panasonic has ADP warranty as well which like the rest of the brands has to be purchased, I am not aware of any company that has accidental damage protection as there baseline warranty for a laptop.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    3. Re:Notsotoughbooks by daveime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm at a loss to understand why anyone would

      1. Leave a valuable possession on the ground
      2. Promptly forget about it
      3. And then drive over it with their car
      4. ?
      5. Profit !

      If that is their attitude to their posessions and life in general, seems like they'd be better just getting an insurance policy for being a "accident-prone forgetful dumbass".

  8. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm at a loss as to why your post was modded insightful.

    - "It's no surprise that the military customers would require a lower ruggedness spec than civilian users. "
    - "Civilian usage, OTOH, requires a device that is durable and lasts for years and can be used in any environment. They don't need great processing power, they just need something that can run their dedicated apps well enough."

    I'm guessing your perception of military laptop usage to be something out of "Hackers?"

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  9. Re:Interesting... by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

    This isn't a uber traveler laptop. It's for people working in harsh environments. Do you work on an oil rig, war zone or the middle of the amazon? If you answer no, then you don't need a rugged laptop.

  10. Why the Toughbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked for the county sheriff's office for several years as an IT / network guy and can tell you that the more durable laptops are DEFINITELY useful in the police context. No matter how often you tell them to be careful or even discipline them, cops will be cops, and most of them are pretty rough around the edges. They toss their notebooks around, drop them, spill coffee on them, you name it. We had one notebook in for updates and servicing that looked like it had fallen into a threshing machine. My coworker asked the officer what the HELL he'd done to it, and he defensively said that HE hadn't done anything to it. It was his K9 partner who had decided to use it as a chew toy, not his problem. At least it stall ran. Oh, and we did have one stop a bullet, although nobody was actually in the car at the time.

  11. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's no surprise that the military customers would require a lower ruggedness spec than civilian users.

    And then there's this story that utterly contradicts you: http://www.toughbookuniverse.com/?p=16

  12. Re:What about Thinkpads? by sjbe · · Score: 5, Funny

    FWIW, somebody picked up my MacBook to see how heavy it was, and managed to drop it off the desk.

    How long did it take you to remove your hands from their throat?

  13. Re:Interesting... by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A construction site would qualify. Normal laptops can't really go outside site offices because of the copious quantities of general shit floating around (dust, water, temperature extremes, etc).

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  14. The point of ruggedized by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering the cost of the Panasonic ToughBooks, I would take a Dell XFR + CompleteCare any day!

    You are missing the point. If you happen to work in any sort of extreme environment (very hot, very cold, very dusty, etc) your Dell is going to die pretty quickly if it even works at all. Furthermore there are jobs where equipment failure has serious consequences. The point is that it doesn't die in the first place, not that you can replace it. Take a standard laptop on a polar expedition or into the middle of a desert and getting your laptop serviced isn't exactly going to be an option you can exercise. And thanks to our good friend Murphy odds are it will break at the least convenient time possible.

    Ruggedized laptops aren't for office workers. They are for people who work very far from climate controlled offices.

  15. General Dynamics by GrBear · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dunno man, I'd rather buy a notebook from a company that knows how to make things rugged, verses a company that makes VCR's and questionable quality audio products.

  16. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A Vet turned History teacher had a saying on his door...

    A computer with a bullet hole in it is a paperweight.

    A map with a bullet hole in it is still a map.

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  17. Toughbooks live up to the name. by UncHellMatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a small police department, and did considerable research before choosing the Toughbook. They're certainly not made for speed, and they're heavy and ugly. But they're not made for that, they're made to take the abuse that is almost inevitable in the hands of people who are, shall we say, not exactly delicate flowers.

    Before actually mounting these computers in our cruisers, I dropped the Toughbook while holding it above my head (I'm about 5'10"), I punched the back of the screen (only succeeded in giving myself a bloody knuckle), poured hot coffee on the keys, and generally did things you would REALLY not want to do to your laptop. They took it with just little scratches here and there, but no issue other than cosmetic.

    One thing I did find is was that, of course, the screen is tough but it's still a laptop screen. The clamps used to mount the laptops on a swing arm in the cars goes slightly over the sides of the Toughbook. If the screen is slammed hard, that can actually cause a crack. Fortunately I'd paid the extra dosh for a better warranty covering such things, and was able to remind the officers that they need to be aware of that issue.

    Dells offerings are really GOOD laptops, and not bad if you need rugged, but not insanely durable. I finally settled on the Toughbook not just because of the abuse I put them through, or just from asking other local PDs what they used. One of my users, a recent hire only a year or so out of the Army Rangers, told me that the Toughbook are what they jumped out of aircraft with. The abuse a grizzled old geek like myself can throw at a computer is pretty much NOTHING like what an Army Ranger could do.

    So far, the TBs have been worth every penny we spent.

  18. Re:Interesting... by bdsesq · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and my aging cat urinated on the keyboard...

    Some years ago my cat urinated on my Apple powerbook. It never worked again. There were no Apple stores then so I had to take it to CompUSA, again and again and again.
    It was Toast!

    Looks like Dell wins the pissing contest!

  19. Re:Hey mods?? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, if you look at the OP's history, his posts are always followed by an AC message asking it to be modded up. Either a big coincidence, or Trisexualpuppy is trying to draw attention and upmods to his own posts.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  20. Re:Interesting... by aicrules · · Score: 4, Funny

    my aging cat, may he rest in peace, urinated on the keyboard

    That is how that line should have read.

  21. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by MaerD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of a trip I took once with a federal sales person who used to work with IBM. Around 2000-2001 he was working with some section of the Marines and trying to sell them some thinkpads. They were non-rugged, but had to hold up to certain standards just in case they ever were in use on/around a war zone.

    After telling them about the tests they did, etc, one of the officers asks if he can try something with the demo model they brought, to see if he could break it. The sales guy tells him to go ahead, if it breaks, no problem, we're trying to sell you what you need, figuring the guy is just going to drop it.
    Instead, the officer walks over to the laptop, pulls out a knife and rams it through the screen and pulls it out. Other than a hole where he shoved it it, the laptop kept going, no problem.

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat..
  22. Re:What about Thinkpads? by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may find that with such a blemish, any AppleCare warranty support is now void.

    My brother's MBP had a video card with a known issue where some times the video card would not output any video (either to the LCD or to the display port). He had the exact model number which experiences this problem, and supposedly every MBP with that model video card is affected and eligible for free repair even out of warranty.

    He took them up on it (he was still under AppleCare, having bought the extended version), but because there was a dent in his case, they claimed the video card was damaged by the dent, and they further claimed they would not be able to repair the damage without replacing the entire chassis. I had seen the dent, it was very small; more of a scratch and a dimple - there's no way this was responsible.

    What should have been a free repair cost him $800.

  23. Re:What about Thinkpads? by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

    No need - a little red light comes on somewhere in Cupertino and Steve picks up a phone and calls a team of highly trained ninjas to deal with it.

    Steve: Hello ninjas?
    Ninjas: Yes?
    Steve: A non-Apple user just dropped one of our brethren's Macbooks.
    Ninjas: Again?
    Steve: Yup.
    Ninjas: We're on it. You want the head in a jar again for your collection?
    Steve: Sure, can you maybe grab his liver too... you never know...

    Disclaimer: I am an Apple user, so this is probably not accurate. I'll bet Phil Schiller handles the ninja calls.

  24. Re:Verdict: Faster than Toughbook, but less rugged by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless it's an IBM mainframe, in which case a mainframe with a bullet hole is still a mainframe, just with one CPU showing a fault condition. Redundancy is a virtue whenever bullets are involved, whether you're the shooter or the owner of the target.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  25. Re:Hey mods?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The cat modded it down. She prefers being referred to as "mature" rather than "aging."

    And lest you forget, there's always more pee where that came from.

  26. Re:What about iBooks by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 2, Funny

    some years ago, my backpack's zipper failed and thus unloaded my 15" iBook down a whole flight of stairs; my heart stopped as I watched it bounce up and down every couple of steps (on its edges), all the way to the ground floor!

    Once I unbent the hook that would normally lock it when closed, it worked just like new!

  27. Re:Interesting... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or someone like myself, who wants to buy exactly ONE laptop that will last forever, and which I do not wish to have to protect like a newborn infant.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  28. Re:Interesting... by Alastor187 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think they even showed the whole test, or they did it wrong. The MIL-STD-810 drop test is actually 26 total drops. Once on each face, edge, and corner.

    They didn't show if they actually measure 4' or just eye-balled it. Also, they were dropping onto some kind of surface, but not directly on the ground. That can have a large influence on the amount of energy transferred to the laptop during the test. Where I work when we do a drop test we do it on a bare concrete floor, and there is fixture to ensure the exact height is used.

  29. Re:Interesting... by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, no amount of "ruggedizing" can prevent obsolescence.

  30. Re:Interesting... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They've typically got a metal case

    Not just generic steel or aluminum, Toughbooks have titanium cases, to keep them light, stiff, and strong. Now you can get a Toughbook with a solid state drive, and the biggest weakness to the system is eliminated. With an SSD on board, it becomes extremely difficult to damage the laptop. You have to hit something so hard you literally tear the components off the motherboard (very hard to do) or overcome the strength of the titanium (which is not thin, btw) to crush it. Even then you're more likely to damage the LCD than anything, and destroying the hard drive would be nearly impossible.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  31. Re:Interesting... by iq+in+binary · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not just generic steel or aluminum, Toughbooks have titanium cases, to keep them light, stiff, and strong.

    Magnesium, actually. Just as tough, half the price. Titanium would have to be machined, which would double the price of the toughbook just in machine time. Magnesium can be formed and stamped.

    --
    Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
  32. Re:Interesting... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Magnesium's also easy to injection mold or die cast. There are some difficulties in safely melting magnesium (as this amazing picture showing a Volkswagen magnesium casting foundry burning in 2006 demonstrates) but it's far easier to do casting processes with magnesium, which melts at a very reasonable temperature, than it is with titanium, which destroys mold materials. Titanium also burns fiercely, and goes so far as to burn in a pure nitrogen environment, the only metal that will do so. Magnesium's also cheaper. However, it isn't anywhere nearly as tough. Titanium has yield strengths on the order of 40,000-140,000 pounds per square inch, while magnesium's more in the 20,000-50,000psi range. However, since magnesium's like 1/3 the density of titanium you can put a *lot* more magnesium into a structure for the same weight, and since stiffness rises as an exponential function of cross-section, you get hellaciously stiff, light structures that are reasonably tough.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.