What Does Google Suggest Suggest About Humanity?
CNETNate writes "You'll laugh, but mostly you'll cry. Some of the questions Google gets asked to deliver results for is beyond worrying. 'Can you put peroxide in your ear?', 'Why would a pregnancy test be negative?', and 'Why can't I own a Canadian?' being just a selection of the truly baffling — and disturbing — questions Google is regularly forced to answer."
Now my curiosity is piqued. WHY can't I own a Canadian? Or at least lease one for a year?
"How is babby formed?"
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
(No, not World of Warcraft.)
I just tried the little experiment in TFA with the phrase "What are..."
Google's #1 suggestion: "...these strawberries doing on my nipples I need them for the fruit salad"
I boggle. I boggle at google.
There's an amazing untold story there. I hope it stays that way.
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
Me:
what is the
Google:
date today
meaning of life
population of Canada
name of bo and luke dukes 69 dodge charger in the tv series the dukes of hazzard
population of the world
sum of days in a week months in a year hours in a day
largest city in canada
canadian dollar worth
best laptop
capital of california
I don't know how their system works, but I don't think it's based on actual searches that people have done. I mean, how many people who google for the name of the Dukes' car would actually type a full sentence like that?
Another one I just tried:
Me:
what's worse than
Google:
a pile of dead babies
http://answers.yahoo.com/
and the end all most awesome/ most depressing question ever asked there:
"how is babby formed, how girl get pragnent"
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Maybe the writer of the article should have googled the questions first?
Of this piece is the same issue that plagues the "Dear God, look at Yahoo Answers, and weep for humanity" articles.
Obviously, the internet is, in fact, filled with fucktards; but it is also full of people searching for jokes, people trolling for the lulz, satire, google bombing, etc. Without reasonably solid statistics munching, you can't really say whether a given query is common because people are searching for it in seriousness, in jest, because they are mocking the people who were searching for it seriously, etc, etc.
That's proof that Google understands the distinction between fact and fiction (let alone blatant impossibility).
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
Because they got sk1ll5, and you are a n00b.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I own a Canadian. Cost me everything I have, and everything I ever will have. Worth every penny.
However, independent observers may conclude she owns me. ...sorry, gotta run, being paged...
Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
Actually, maybe I was responsible for that... let me explain: To anonymize my search data, I have a script that regularly posts the following question to google:
Can I put ... in my ...?
Then on the blanks, the script will put random nouns, but apparently, the script is broken, since some words come out more often than others.
Sorry!
If you type in "why is" one of the first suggestions is "why is there a dead Pakistani on my couch?"
I just poked my head in the living room. It's actually a pretty good question.