Slashdot Mirror


Great White Sharks Visiting San Francisco

Ponca City, We love you writes "Juliet Eilperin writes in the Washington Post that while for years, humans have thought of great white sharks as wandering the sea at random, only occasionally venturing close to shore, it turns out we were wrong. Scientists lured 179 great white sharks to their boat with a carpet decoy designed to look like a seal, and used a lance to attach satellite tags with the aid of 2.3-inch titanium darts to track the sharks and discovered that Pacific white sharks spend months near the northern and central California coast between August and February, foraging among elephant seals, sea lions, and other prey. The sharks were spotted as far inland as the mouth of the San Francisco Bay, east of the Golden Gate Bridge. 'It shows you how wild it is off our West Coast of North America. This is Yellowstone,' says Stanford University marine sciences professor Barbara A. Block. The fact that 'a major concentration' of great whites can ignore humans 'shows us the sharks are really minding their own business. The number of interactions with people is very small, considering,' says Salvador J. Jorgensen."

105 comments

  1. I read the article... by cjfs · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and there was no mention of laser beams (frickin' or otherwise), so move along now.

    1. Re:I read the article... by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the difference between a laser and a frickin' laser?

    2. Re:I read the article... by dougisfunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Intent, just like the difference between manslaughter and murder.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    3. Re:I read the article... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If your intent with a laser can be described by the word frickin', all I can say is... you're doing it wrong!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  2. uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jaws?

    1. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's see. You're using a film, produced by Hollywood, as a guide to the behaviour of a wild creature. Great move, that.

      While you're at it, how about using Independence Day (ID4) as a guide to defeating an alien invasion using a Macintosh? Or The Core for a guide to plate tectonics? Or The Day After Tomorrow for a guide on global warming?

      Sheesh.

      As any serious diver will tell you, generally speaking, a shark sighting is a cause for excitement and anticipation, not panic. Leave them alone, and they'll generally leave you alone. Remember, kids: things make the news because they're (a) sensational, and (b) rare (which leads to the sensation.) The hype of shark attacks is nowhere near justified.

    2. Re:uh by Nighttime · · Score: 5, Funny

      As any serious diver will tell you, generally speaking, a shark sighting is a cause for excitement and anticipation, not panic. Leave them alone, and they'll generally leave you alone.

      Unless there's ominous cello music playing in the background.

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    3. Re:uh by tyrus568 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to mention the novel. Peter Benchley, the author of Jaws, has stated that he regrets the perception that his work created of great white sharks.

      Apparently, he didn't really know anything about sharks back then. Did anybody, even scientists? No. Mr. Benchley has offered the opinion that he wouldn't have written the book if he had known anything near what we know today, 'at least not in good conscience.'

      Peter Benchley became an ocean conservationist later in life. Unfortunately, he passed away in 2006.

      According to Wikipedia, "Benchley was a member of the National Council of Environmental Defense and a spokesman for its Oceans Program: "[T]he shark in an updated Jaws could not be the villain; it would have to be written as the victim; for, worldwide, sharks are much more the oppressed than the oppressors."

      Just so you know.

    4. Re:uh by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      after all, TFA *did* say "other prey." A clear euphemism for "people." Therefore, sharks are in SF to eat people. Don't go surfing or you'll die!!!

      *Imagine several pages of sensationalist hyperbole continuing here, please.*

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    5. Re:uh by jason.sweet · · Score: 4, Funny

      they'll generally leave you alone

      Mike Tyson "generally" is not going to kick your ass, but you're still not going to sit next to him in the airport. Are you?

    6. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I can 2nd that based on all the Shark Fin soup I get to see in the food courts out here in Singapore.. then again, my thoughts go out to all the Chickens on this planet...

    7. Re:uh by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      In d minor?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:uh by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mike Tyson "generally" is not going to kick your ass, but you're still not going to sit next to him in the airport. Are you?

      I might be a little nervous, but sure I'd sit next to him since I know I'd be okay if I just didn't do anything that made me look like a wounded sea lion.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckin-A I would, hopefully he'd kick my ass and I'd sue the shit out of him.

    10. Re:uh by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible plan. He's broke and you would be cross-eyed and have to wear a diaper for the rest of your life.

    11. Re:uh by skelly33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As any serious California surfer will tell you, a great white in the water where you are at is bad news - "leave them alone" is no consolation to people who are out in the water and get bitten, and sometimes killed. They cannot be safely dismissed out of hand. They are wild, aggressive hunters that do not think. We all know that the whites come in to feed during the winter - that has always been the case. Shark attack incident logs alone make that clear.

    12. Re:uh by geekoid · · Score: 0

      You make a good point, but this always annoies me:
      "guide to defeating an alien invasion using a Macintosh? "

      Why not? They studied the technology for 50 years, one can safely presume electricity behaves the same, There isn't a reason a program can't be written to interface with the other system.

      Seriously, there is no technical reason for this not to work. None at all.

      "Leave them alone, and they'll generally leave you alone. "
      Also, If I kill them they will leave me and everyone else alone forever.
      Hate. Sharks.

      "The hype of shark attacks is nowhere near justified."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw9qMZSuE9k

      SOmepeople say that sharks mistake us for food, thye are wrong. TO a shark we ARE food. we're just lucky we are a food the generally don't prefer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:uh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Bunch of crap.

      Even knwoingf wht we know now, yes, a shark could be the villain. The even mention in the book and movie that it is unusual behavior.

      Bunch of people overlooking facts to support there environmental stand.

      Here is one, what wouild ahppen if all the sharks were gone? They are the top of the food chain, as such they don't mater much to the rest of it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:uh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "is one, what wouild ahppen if all the sharks were gone? They are the top of the food chain, as such they don't mater much to the rest of it."

      Ignorance, ye hath a name. And that name is UID 135745.

      You have no knowledge of biology, do you? I don't think I've ever heard anything so stupid in all my years in high school science class. Given the absolute idiocy of what you just said, I'd bet that you didn't even finish high school.

    16. Re:uh by unholy1 · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to play a cello underwater? I found a youtube clip of an underwater violin, but no cello...

    17. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Benchley didn't create that perception. He catered to it.

  3. I for one by AuMatar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    welcome our San Francisco Bay shark overlords

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:I for one by conureman · · Score: 1

      I never enjoyed swimming in the ocean, I have friends that surf, but I eschew the proximity with hungry locals. I have never felt this was an irrational fear, nor do I bother debating it with others. I rolled a kayak in Richardson Bay once, back in the seventies. That shit didn't wash off for a week. Clean Water Act FTW!

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    2. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. There are few places that deserve sharks as much as San Francisco. The rest of the country applauds!

    3. Re:I for one by belgar · · Score: 1

      You know, I always knew that this shot ACTUALLY happened. This just confirms it!

      --
      What does it mean to wake out of a dream
      and be wearing someone else's shorts?
      BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
  4. misread by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    Am I'm the only one that misread "foraging" as "fraging" ?

    1. Re:misread by cjfs · · Score: 1

      Fraging amongst their prey?

      Now I have an image of a shark at a lan party stuck in my head.

    2. Re:misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *gasp*! LAN Shark, cleverest species of them all!

    3. Re:misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, probably.

    4. Re:misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      f-raging? That's crazy mad.

    5. Re:misread by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Since it's properly spelled "fragging", I'd say you probably are.

  5. They won't ignore humans for long. by Scholasticus · · Score: 4, Funny

    [Scene: A New York apartment. Someone knocks on the door.] Woman: [not opening the door] Yes? Voice: (mumbling) Mrs. Arlsburgerhhh? Woman: What? Voice: (mumbling) Mrs. Johannesburrrr? Woman: Who is it? Voice: [pause] Flowers. Woman: Flowers for whom? Voice: [long pause] Plumber, ma'am. Woman: I don't need a plumber. You're that clever shark, aren't you? Voice: [pause] Candygram. Woman: Candygram, my foot. You get out of here before I call the police. You're the shark, and you know it. Voice: Wait. I-I'm only a dolphin, ma'am. Woman: A dolphin? Well...okay. [opens door].

    1. Re:They won't ignore humans for long. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Since a dolphin can kick a shark's ass (by ramming its nose in its side), ...well... :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:They won't ignore humans for long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends who notices whom first. Sharks often approach and prey upon dolphins from behind. It avoids pesky echolocation.

  6. In TFA, love the first paragraph by failedlogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Love the first paragraph in TFA that points out the obvious: "For years, humans have thought of great white sharks wandering the sea at random, only occasionally venturing close to shore."

    Holy shit. I always thought "For years, elephants have thought of great white sharks wandering the sea at random, only occasionally venturing close to shore."

    I just learned something today. Guess I thought I knew more about elephants than people. I am sadly mistaken.

    1. Re:In TFA, love the first paragraph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Most journalists are of the non-human, sickle-celled variety.

    2. Re:In TFA, love the first paragraph by haifastudent · · Score: 1

      While slashdot might be considered a human-centric website, there are in fact many visitors from all species. Most websites acknowledge them, posting measurements in metric as opposed to imperial, and specifying which species are the topic without assuming. See the How Vulnerable Is Our Power Grid? article for a similar discussion in the comments regarding slashdot's US-centric nature, or and space article for comment discussions of slashdot's Earth-centric nature.

      --
      Thank for reading to the sig. You may stop reading now. It is safe. There is no more content. Why are you still reading?
    3. Re:In TFA, love the first paragraph by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm an elephant. And you don't understand me! Because you don't know me at aaaallllll!!!
      *cries*
      *walks away*
      *stompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstomp**blowstrunkintohankie**stompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstompstomp*

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  7. you can see them from the golden gate bridge by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    here's a typical shot of a great white in san francisco bay:

    http://www.empireonline.com/features/golden-gate-bridge-in-movies/

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you can see them from the golden gate bridge by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah. Next, you will claim that was what the recent bridge repair was about?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Quick... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick... someone blame global warming!

    It's to blame anytime anywhere something in the vaguest sense weird happens. WE NEVER HAD ANYTHING WEIRD HAPPEN BEFORE GLOBAL WARMING. EVER.

    Call Al Gore - him staring pensively at great whites will make a great opening to Inconvenient Truth 2 - Revenge of the Evil People Who Didn't Buy Hybrids

    1. Re:Quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick... someone try and draw climate change into this discussion for no reason whatsoever so they can whine about it.

      Oh wait... too late.

    2. Re:Quick... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Quick... someone blame global warming!

      Or Microsoft! This must be Microsoft's fault! Or is it the RIAA? Or the US Patent Office? Damn, so many villans!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  9. What do you call a shark on the move? by lena_10326 · · Score: 1, Funny

    A lawyer who chases ambulances?

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  10. No lasers? by Zouden · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is madness!

    Madness? No... this is Yellowstone

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:No lasers? by davester666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good thing they are only visiting. American's are getting fatter and are higher in cholesterol. Having more than a couple just ruin the shark's diet.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  11. Jawns by Fotograf · · Score: 4, Funny

    boring...

    --
    God's gift to chicks
  12. Obligatory XKCD reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I thought they were visiting using balloons...

    http://xkcd.com/585/

  13. really?? by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's always been common knowledge that great whites come in close to shore, after all their food source lives on the beach. The summary and TFA make it sound like some great revilation that sharks go where their prey goes.... hell here in australia there's a few attacks each year.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:really?? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about Australia's issue. If CA has a large number as well, I wonder Aussies are getting munch so much more? Greater number of sharks, shortage of food supply, or are the sharks down under simply more aggressive?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always been common knowledge that great whites come in close to shore, after all their food source lives on the beach.

      What - do sharks eat queers and illegal aliens?

    3. Re:really?? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ...or are the sharks down under simply more aggressive?"

      I would guess we have a lot more pointers than CA just because of the scale of their territory and the abundance of prey down here, but not all attacks are white pointers, mako sharks and the now rare grey nurse shark (amoung others) are also known to attack people.

      For once I agree witb timmarthy (the GP), it's common knowledge in Australia that swimming/surfing anywhere near a seal colony is tempting fate (especially near dusk or dawn).

      Oz Trivia: "White pointers" is a euphemisim for topless bathers.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:really?? by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about Australia's issue. If CA has a large number as well, I wonder Aussies are getting munch so much more?

      More people in the water due to the water being warmer?

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    5. Re:really?? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Americans are fatter. So a meal lasts much longer than a skinny Aussie.

    6. Re:really?? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, it has been long known that these sharks frequent the Farallon Islands, near the coast of Northern California: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farallon_Islands#Sharks

    7. Re:really?? by Matt_R · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about Australia's issue. If CA has a large number as well, I wonder Aussies are getting munch so much more? Greater number of sharks, shortage of food supply, or are the sharks down under simply more aggressive?

      Well we do have a larger coastline than CA :) And down here, we have sharks eating other sharks.

      Shark C-Section

      10-ft shark eaten by even bigger shark

    8. Re:really?? by stockard · · Score: 1

      Yep, there have been a number of biologists studying great whites for a few decades near the Farallon Islands off the coast of San Francisco. There's even a book, The Devil's Teeth, detailing a shark season with the biologists.

  14. EFF SHARK ATTACK! by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

    I am not afraid of Great White Sharks, but I am very afraid (after reading Dan Brown) of the EFF Sharks!

  15. The sharks are developing a sweet tooth by bmecoli · · Score: 1

    They are hungry for Twinkies. :o

  16. And this is news...how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are occasional sightings while surfing up and down the central coast. They are there. Sometimes you can see them, sometimes you can't. In fact, one such surfer had his board snapped in half just last week down in Santa Cruz: http://www.surfline.com/video/featured-clips/eric-geiselmans-shark-encounter_32974

    Plus given the warmer waters this summer and the abundance of sea lions (food!) I would expect that there will be some good feeding this year for the Landlords.

  17. Awesome by spyder-implee · · Score: 1

    Such beautiful creatures. Although I'm glad not to see them in the bay here in Melbourne.

    --
    Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
  18. Ignore humans? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Relatively few humans are crazy enough to swim near the Golden Gates in the first place. There's a reason Alcatraz was such a secure prison, despite being a fairly short swim away from San Francisco; and it has nothing to do with sharks. Hypothermia, fast tides and currents, a rocky coastline, and a major shipping channel are not very conducive to happyfunbeachday.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:Ignore humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there many surfers near the Golden Gate bridge? Sharks really like the seal likenesses people use to ride the waves and the wind with. Dr. Jim Gray, the famous computer scientist died recently (2007) near these waters. We can only speculate the actual events now, but the presence of the hunting great whites makes one thinking of the possibilities, like a collision with the 40 ft ship.

    2. Re:Ignore humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess he needed a bigger boat.

    3. Re:Ignore humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Plus, Great Whites hate the smell of B.O. and patchouli.

    4. Re:Ignore humans? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Relatively few humans are crazy enough to swim near the Golden Gates in the first place.

      Maybe not directly under the Golden Gate, but you don't have to go very far to still be in sight of the bridge and find a beach and/or a place where people surf.

      It's not like a shark can't travel distance or anything. So, maybe a 5 minute cruise for a shark, and there's people there.

      I think what's more relevant here is that there's a lot of sharks in very close proximity to where people actually go. A lot more sharks (and a lot more often) than people had previously realized.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Ignore humans? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      I was there in teh summer touring the bay in a boat and it was freezing. Still, there were dozens of people wind surfing around and under the Golden Gate. I don't know how they didn't freeze, but I wonder if they were aware of the shark population under them.

    6. Re:Ignore humans? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I was there in teh summer touring the bay in a boat and it was freezing. Still, there were dozens of people wind surfing around and under the Golden Gate. I don't know how they didn't freeze, but I wonder if they were aware of the shark population under them.

      'Freezing' is a word that is pretty elastic depending on where the person using the word is from. Coming from a place with real actual winters (Canada, eh), I've found that a lot of people who say "freezing" have never actually encountered real temperatures where water would freeze in the ambient air temperature.

      I was in northern Arizona once in February. To me, it was a balmy temperature way above what I'd left at home. To the people from Florida, it was "freezing". The tour guide had warned me I'd need a jacked since it could get "pretty cold" up near the Grand Canyon. When I asked him for a definition of "pretty cold", he said "oh, as low as 60" -- I laughed at him and said I was Canadian and that was t-shirt weather. :-P

      I suspect the (wind) surfers might also be wearing wet-suits, which go a long way to keeping warm. I've known people who surfed in Nova Scotia in November. That is freezing.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Ignore humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, that's something they told to scare the inmates. You've heard of this, right? http://www.escapefromalcatraztriathlon.com/Race_Info/course.htm

      Maybe you haven't, not a lot of people outside of the Bay Area have.

      I've done it. We were literally a few hundred feet from the shore of Alcatraz island. Also, we took the long way to make sure it was 1.5 miles, but you could easily swim North or due South for a much shorter swim.

  19. Tag by Spacezilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists lured 179 great white sharks to their boat

    What, no "youregonnaneedabiggerboat" tag? I'm disappointed in you, slashdot. :(

  20. Obligatory xkcd quote by Alif · · Score: 0
  21. Forget "Shark Watching" tour cruises . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Go "Shark Darting" instead!

    You get to peg sharks with 2.3 inch titanium darts!

    It's not a good idea to take a quick dip in the water off the boat, though. I think sharks are smart enough to figure out who threw those painful titanium darts sticking out of their backs.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Forget "Shark Watching" tour cruises . . . by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think sharks are smart enough to figure out who threw those painful titanium darts sticking out of their backs.

      I am pretty sure, sharks' behavior toward tasty meat-filled creatures in front of them is not predicated on recognizing those creatures as related to other events in those sharks' lives.

      Also
      i'm a shark!!! i'm a SHAAAARK!
      suck my titanium daaaart!! I'M A SHAAARK!!

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  22. Oblig. XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all part of scientific outreach: http://xkcd.com/585/

    1. Re:Oblig. XKCD by DanielG42 · · Score: 1

      It's all part of scientific outreach: http://xkcd.com/585/

      Is it bad that I knew what XKCD you linked to, based on the topic? :D

      --
      Daniel
  23. Greg Norman by bakes · · Score: 1

    So what? Greg Norman has played golf everywhere, it's no big deal.

    --
    Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  24. This just in... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news, Scientists on the same ship studying shark communication have made a major breakthrough when they repeatedly translated a consistently repeated series of noises from the tagged sharks to mean:
    "Grab your pointy sticks and climb on down here into the water with us you air breathing little assholes!"

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  25. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we could get people to start minding their own business

  26. Great White migration not that surprising by hywel_ap_ieuan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually shark researchers have been observing Great Whites returning to the Farallon Islands about 35 miles west of the Golden Gate for over 20 years. This website doesn't talk about migration and return, but Susan Casey's book The Devil's Teeth does discuss how the researchers on the island saw many of the same sharks returning year after year.

    The surprising things in the research (as opposed to the article) are the genetic distinction of the Hawaii-California sharks versus sharks in the Western Pacific, and to a lesser extent the fact that sharks habitually come close to shore but rarely interact with humans.

  27. So what? by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 2, Funny

    We need a bigger boat.

  28. All they had to do by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

    Was ask albacore fisherman on the West Coast if they had seen any White Sharks.
    Or asked some West coast divers.
    But I guess that wouldn't have been as scientific.

  29. How God Damned stupid are these people by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    Of course it would have been too easy to ask the locals near Stinson Beach, or Dillon Beach.

    1. Re:How God Damned stupid are these people by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Anecdote is not DATA, you morons.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. A classmate of my sister by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several years back, an acquaintance of my sister was sea kayaking off of Northern California with her boy friend. They came up missing. They found one of them, I forget which, drifting, dead of blood loss, in the two kayaks which were lashed together. The one they found was missing large chunks of body. The other person was never found. While the sharks seem to mind their own business most of the time, the few exceptions are killers.

    --
    I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    1. Re:A classmate of my sister by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that wasn't attributed to the State Government?

    2. Re:A classmate of my sister by hondo77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By "several" I think you mean "twenty" and by "Northern California" I think you mean "Malibu".

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:A classmate of my sister by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that looks like it might be the one. The story my sister told differs in some significant respects, which could just be the usual game of Telephone.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    4. Re:A classmate of my sister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, because she didn't know the people, she had just heard the story like lots of other people.

      I love how people tell old stories as if they know who it happened to, I once had a friend tell me a story that happened to ME, which I told HIM, many many years ago. Sword it happened to him though. lol, fuckin idiots.

  31. They do it every day! by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    Relatively few humans are crazy enough to swim near the Golden Gates in the first place.

    Maybe not directly under the Golden Gate, but you don't have to go very far to still be in sight of the bridge and find a beach and/or a place where people surf.

    It's not like a shark can't travel distance or anything. So, maybe a 5 minute cruise for a shark, and there's people there.

    I think what's more relevant here is that there's a lot of sharks in very close proximity to where people actually go. A lot more sharks (and a lot more often) than people had previously realized.

    Cheers

    Try searching YouTube for "surfing Fort Point."
    I've seen people surfing directly under the Golden Gate (singular, for the benefit of the GP) for decades. And as the parent points out, there are several beaches very close to the mouth of the Gate. Additionally, the summary mentioned Great Whites coming east of the Golden Gate Bridge. That's inside the bay, right where those surfers and the aforementioned beaches are located.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
    1. Re:They do it every day! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Try searching YouTube for "surfing Fort Point."

      Yeah, shortly after I posted that I googled for "san francisco surfing" and found this, which clearly shows someone surfing with the Golden Gate in the background.

      People definitely swim and surf relatively close to that area, despite the assertion that humans don't generally do that.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  32. California surfers have known this all along by al0ha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The large shadows I've seen and strange unaccounted for splashing noises I've heard over the years, while out in winter surf, which sparked spooky feelings, are definitely something; and something big. Sometimes they are dolphins, but other times, when you don't see a dolphin, man does the hair stand up on the back of your neck....

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
  33. About 280 miles north of SF.. by joocemann · · Score: 1

    Here in Humboldt Bay, we've got plenty of great whites as well.

    My family likes to fish shark once in a while. When I was a kid my dad and his friend pulled up a great white that was longer than his 14 foot aluminum boat!

    You also hear about shark attacks from great whites at Moonstone Beach (about 20 miles north).
    -------

    I've never thought that the sharks are wandering out in the wide open. Put it this way, the sea lions and seals they eat are at the mouths of rivers (and in the bay) because of the fish spawn. The sharks should be found where their food is.

    1. Re:About 280 miles north of SF.. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I've never thought that the sharks are wandering out in the wide open. Put it this way, the sea lions and seals they eat are at the mouths of rivers (and in the bay) because of the fish spawn. The sharks should be found where their food is.

      The sharks do range over several thousands of miles during the year. From California to Hawaii is pretty much as "out in the wide open" as you can get. I suspect they're mostly just passing through the open water bits, but a large shark will have no problem ranging over vast distances.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  34. Re:uh Eatign in San Francisco by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

    But the shark just wanted to taste the rainbow!

    --
    ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
  35. Rubbish by imtheguru · · Score: 1

    While the sharks seem to mind their own business most of the time, the few exceptions are killers.

    "Since 1580, when records began, the total number of attacks on humans by sharks has been logged at about 2,200 only. This is equivalent to just 5% of the number of Americans injured by toilets in the year 1996." --Stephen Fry on QI

    Validate the number yourself by looking though the records of the The International Shark Attack File (ISAF). The ISAF is a global database of shark attacks.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Shark_Attack_File]

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
  36. Who. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "humans have thought of great white sharks as wandering the sea at random,"

    You must mean humans that don't live near a coast.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. Re:uh Eatign in San Francisco by the+darn · · Score: 1

    He'll eat some gentle people there.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.