Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Sponsors the Development of Enlightenment

An anonymous reader writes "The Enlightenment window manager project has shared on its website that it now has the backing of a major (top-five) electronics manufacturer that will be actively sponsoring the project and using Enlightenment on its devices. No manufacturer was named, but Phoronix has dug deeper and found out that Samsung is sponsoring Enlightenment. Phoronix provides independent confirmation along with citing a new Enlightenment program that Samsung sponsored and then released under the LGPL-3. They also have videos of some of the new work to this window manager that Samsung funded."

15 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Wow! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Samsung Sponsors the Development of Enlightenment

    That's pretty ambitious. ;-)

    So, a Buddhist walks up to a hot dog vendor, and says "make me one with everything". :-P

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Samsung Sponsors the Development of Enlightenment

      That's pretty ambitious. ;-)

      So, a Buddhist walks up to a hot dog vendor, and says "make me one with everything". :-P

      Cheers

      The vendor hands him a fully loaded hot dog, and the Buddhist hands him a $20.
      After a few moments, the Buddhist asks for his change, and the hot dog vendor replies, "change must come from within".

    2. Re:Wow! by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's pretty ambitious.

      No, no, Samsung isn't funding an attempt to develop the attainment of a blessed state in which their customers can transcend desire and suffering and achieve Nirvana. That would be nearly impossible.

      Samsung is funding an attempt to develop for their customers a completed version of the Enlightenment Window Manager. That will be completely impossible.

  2. Scooped by d34dluk3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Enlightenment already developed by Rousseau, Diderot, and Voltaire, among others.

  3. E17 is pretty stable now by jlowe · · Score: 5, Informative
    While news on the site may have been sparse, quite a lot of work has been going on with E17 development. The developers had released a roadmap showing that perhaps it would be ready for a Christmas release. While I doubt that milestone will be achieved, it has made significant progress.

    I've been using it for months as my desktop at home and on my laptop. It is quite usable and I've had zero crashes for a while now. Rasterman has always had a focus on small-screen devices, so this development doesn't surprise me. But if you haven't checked it out in a while, you should.

  4. Re:LGPL-3? by Disgruntled+Goats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, being BSD licensed, you can release a fork under a new license I believe since BSD is a permissive license.

    The reverse, however, would not be true.

    What you believe is wrong. The BSD doesn't let you change the license terms of the source code at your will. You must have permission from the copyright holder(s) to do so.

  5. Re:LGPL-3? by Disgruntled+Goats · · Score: 4, Informative

    To further add you may be confusing this with the fact that you can include BSD code inside other code that is licensed under another license, but this doesn't change the license that the BSD code is under.

  6. Excellent! by Jerrry · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now maybe we'll see the final release of E17 before the 22nd century. Who knows, it may even come out before Duke Nukem Forever.

    1. Re:Excellent! by kwiqsilver · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now maybe we'll see the final release of E17 before the 22nd century. Who knows, it may even come out before Duke Nukem Forever.
      I'm sure the first thing Rasterman will do with this new funding is begin a complete rewrite of e from scratch. So once Mitsubishi starts sponsoring Duke Nukem, it'll be a tight race.

  7. Re:Seems Obvious by junglee_iitk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets hope that Samsung manages to get e17 out of door in 2010.

    Wow, I was trying it out 5 years ago and it still hasn't seen a release.

  8. I've always liked enlightenment. by QJimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used it back in the days of SuSE 6.3 and really liked it then. It had the most eye candy and "slickness" at the time (1999 or so), blowing other WMs and Win98 out the water, I mean who couldn't love the semi-transparent "eTerm" windows?

    Other WMs have caught up now with the eye candy, but enlightenment is and was one of the few window managers that actually displayed innovation instead of simply tailing after windows and mac. It's nice to see it getting recognition.

  9. Windowmaker and GNUstep by argent · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wish someone would do the same with Windowmaker and GNUstep, but I suspect the licensing has closed off that path.

  10. Re:Kill the X Boondoggle Already by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny how this argument mostly comes from people who know virtually nothing about X. Most importantly, not the difference between the concept, the protocol and the implementation.

    And just because it's 20 years old doesn't mean it sucks. How old is TCP/IP? The mouse? The binary system?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  11. Re:Used E again recently.... by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you talking about e16 ? Compositing and GL work fine in it (I'm using the release packaged in Debian). I'm actually quite surprised that people don't list it as one of the compositing window managers like Beryl / Compiz.

    It doesn't have as many extra features as Beryl / Compiz, but it has the few I care about... namely - composited drop shadows, true-translucent backgrounds in gnome-terminal, translucent window movement, and composited miniature windows in the pager.

    It's actually been much more stable than Beryl on my system... eventually Beryl seems to exhaust the video memory and I get lots of video corruption, which seldom happens under the e16 compositor. It's also pretty easy to turn compositing on and off when I want more GPU resources dedicated to an OpenGL app or game.

  12. Re:Some explain the Linux GUI thing? by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're different layers.

    X is the graphics system. It provides the video driver and makes pretty pictures show up on your screen.

    Enlightenment is a window manager, it gives those pretty pictures borders so that you can drag them around.

    Gnome is a Desktop Environment, which is a couple hundred programs that are designed to work together and work the same way. This includes a window manager, menus for launching programs and a place to hold minimized programs and icons, a file manager, network configuration tools, a terminal, calculator, scanning software, music player, cd ripper, graphics editors, etc etc.

    X is always there.

    The features that Enlightenment provides works using X.

    The features that Gnome provides works using a window manager and X. Gnome provides Metacity as its window manager by default, but you can use others like Enlightenment.

    This is highly consistent.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.