Slashdot Mirror


No More Fair-Price Refund For Declining XP EULA

mark0 writes "Getting a fair-price refund from Amazon or Asus after declining the Windows XP EULA appears to be a thing of the past. In contrast to reports from the US and the UK from earlier in the year, Amazon simply refuses and provides information to contact Microsoft. Asus is offering US$6. Despite being confronted with publicly available information about the real OEM price of Windows XP Home Edition being $US25-US$30, Asus replies, 'The refund price for the decline of the EULA is correct in it being US$6. This price unfortunately is not negotiable. I do apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Please be assured that it is not ASUS intentions to steer you away in any which way.'"

6 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Piracy? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

    ever heard of punitive damage? If you only ever have to pay exactly for what you did, and no putitive damage, when you g et caught, there would be no point NOT to do it.

    First, I shouldn't even dignify your post with a response given the poor spelling and general lack of knowledge of the subject matter, but I'm bored. Second, here's how it looks in the US (I'm even more of a non-expert on non-US laws);

    Actual:
    $6--30. (from TFA) Copyright holder is also entitled to any profits derived from the violation (in general). In the case of someone using XP privately for themselves and deriving no profit beyond that, the profits would also likely be zero.
    Statutory:
    Only available if the copyright is registered with the copyright office.
    $200 if it can be proved it was accidental at the discretion of the court.
    $750--30,000 if it cannot be proved, but there is reasonable doubt at the discretion of the court.
    Up to $150,000 per work if it can be proved to be willful. Source: 17 USC 504.
    Punitive:
    Not generally available. [1] It may be available if statutory damages are unavailable, or if the plaintiff elects to seek actual damages (plus profits derived). This is very rarely done in practice, and generally the punitive damages will equal the actual damages plus profits derived from the violation.

    In the vast majority of cases, statutory damages far exceed actual or potential punitive damages.

    [1] Leutwyler v. Royal Hashemite Court of Jordan, 184 F. Supp. 2d 303, 308
    [2] http://library.findlaw.com/2005/Feb/10/172826.html#_edn14

    P.S. IANAL.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  2. Re:Old OS by cboslin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are six great options, ZaReason, Inc: Building Linux hardware so you don't have to

    Here are six more: System 76 laptops

    Did you even try to look? Most people do not even try.

    The biggest mistake any consumer of PCs, laptops, towers, etc can make today is to buy any hardware from a vendor who does not understand and do Linux. This goes for all the big box stores and even Dell, they only pay a passing glance to Linux and do not really do it right, as experienced by Linux being buried down in their website and not prominently marketed on their main page from the start.

    If you are foolish enough to purchase from anyone but a Linux hardware computer builder, you will be frustrated with needless vendor lock-in issues meant only to keep you a Microsoft Windows users, period.

    Here is the rub, Every Linux PC can run Windows. Because of Vendor Lock-In, not every Windows PC can run Linux.

    Even the most devout Windows / Microsoft FAN can NOT deny that simple fact!

    Moral of story: Eventually a proprietary company will STOP supporting what you purchased attempting you to pay more for new equipment. Your only choice for that older, yet very useful, hardware is to KNOW you can run Linux (any distro, there are many). Even if you do not want to run Linux, by purchasing hardware that will, you will be in a position to donate that older hardware to non profits that will get Linux up and running and donate it to third world countries so children can learn.

    There is NO downside to purchasing hardware from a Linux vendor. There are almost ALWAYS vendor lock-in hardware issues from any of the big box stores and anyone who only does Microsoft.

    Use the two vendors ZaReason or System 76 above, you will be glad you did, and you will help out children in third world countries one day when you upgrade your hardware, as the hardware your purchased will run Linux.

  3. Re:Old OS by mybadluck22 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Apple Store.

    --
    If I could rearrange the keyboard, I'd put U and I together.
  4. Re:Old OS by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did you read the parent post? He said there were online vendors, but no local shops. You posted online vendors... I do agree with the reasoning after, however.

  5. Windows 7 EULA is far worse... by Hymer · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...it is now up to the manufacturer to decide whether they will give you a refund or tell you to return the PC, just look at MS EULA page.

  6. Re:Microsoft dumping to gain netbook marketshare? by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought it was understood that when the netbook debuted Microsoft knocked the price down to almost nothing to eliminate Linux in the space. This article is nothing more than official confirmation that Microsoft did knock the price down to $6 a copy for ASUS to keep linux off the netbooks.