Slashdot Mirror


Apple vs. Microsoft Multi-Touch Mouse Comparison

blee37 writes "This is a side-by-side comparison of the Apple and Microsoft multi-touch mice. It includes video demonstrations of using the mice in applications, first-person shooters and 3D manipulation. It also has new photos of the internals of all the mice."

65 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Touch screens and the like by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem with this, like with many other touch screen like devices, is that you don't get physical feedback when you're clicking or scrolling or doing anything. There's a reason why you actually need to push the mouse button a little bit so it clicks. Not much, but it actually feels like a click. Keyboard presses need to be the same way too - you need the feedback.

    Another example is the scroll in mouses. My Logitech MX Revolution mouse has both seamless and non-seamless mode that you can activate for different apps. Seamless mode was activated by default for IE and I had to take it off, because mouse scroll also needs to "tick" and feel back when you're scrolling. The Apple video shows that you can scroll faster by moving your finger rapidly - guess what, you can do that with a normal scroll too, just by rapidly firing the scroller to either direction (the logitech software actually releases the tick for a bit so it works even better)

    Other thing to consider is how quickly the touch area gets dirty and less functional. I sometimes like to eat a great three story cheese bacon hamburger filled with majonese, chipotle ketchup and delicious cheese with deep fried french fries, topped with a cold beer and chocolate ice cream with strawberries and chocolate dipping. Lets face it, the touch area is going to get dirty. Will it function the same way after that and can you clean it as easily?

    1. Re:Touch screens and the like by peragrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Onsidering my iPhone is easy to clean and I don't need tactile feedback for the on screen keyboard I would say it is something some people will work easily with and others won't. Your results will vary.

      As a side note if your eating that mess if food at your computer and not using napkins or towels your keyboard has to be disgusting

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Touch screens and the like by sirdankus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The dirt issue seems much worse with normal scroll mice. Bacon remnants are fairly easy to wipe (or indeed, lick) off a smooth surface like a touch pad. Once any amount of dirt gets into the mechanical bits of a scroll wheel, you're left with the option of putting up with a sticky scroll wheel, or buying a new mouse.

      The tactile feedback part is exactly how I feel, though.

    3. Re:Touch screens and the like by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A Philips screwdriver and 15 minutes of your life will suffice to clean the inside of your mouse too.

    4. Re:Touch screens and the like by odin84gk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      New capacitive sensors will work, even if it is covered in a layer of crap. You don't need to physically touch the surface to get it to work.

      The real issue is this: How can you make it intuitive enough to work and become widely accepted? There are some people who still struggle with the right-click, let alone anything more complicated.

    5. Re:Touch screens and the like by Jurily · · Score: 4, Funny

      Onsidering my iPhone is easy to clean and I don't need tactile feedback

      You never input text?

    6. Re:Touch screens and the like by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem with this, like with many other touch screen like devices, is that you don't get physical feedback when you're clicking or scrolling or doing anything.

      Thet doesn't seem to matter to iPhone or MegaGame machines. You need feedback, but not auditory or tactile feedback. The only need for tactile or auditory feedback is if your devise is so molasses-in-January slow that nothing apparently happens when you use the control.

      Feedback needs to appear instantaneous or it's useless.

    7. Re:Touch screens and the like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Magic Mouse clicks. The entire surface is a button, just like with the older Mighty Mouse (a.k.a. Apple Mouse). It may be touch sensitive, but Apple agreed that feedback was necessary and built it in.

    8. Re:Touch screens and the like by PizzaAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However that isn't the point. Let me try to explain this in the way of an analogy:

      Lets imagine you're in the middle of a epic World of Warcraft raid. You're starting to get hungry, but it's still fun. Your option is to either quit the game and go make food in the kitchen. Second option is to quickly skype for a pizza delivery guy to bring you a large pizza with some mountain dew. Like in GP's case, I think what you're going to do is obvious. 15 minutes later and you hear the doorbell ring and after a short while your mom walking down the stairs with your delicious large hawaiian pan pizza. While grabbing the first slice, an alliance guy jumps out of nowhere and starts hammering you with fireballs. That scares you so much that the pizza flies from your hands straight to your 30" LCD monitor. While trying to catch the pizza slice in air, you knock over the mountain dew bottle over your new multi-touch mouse.

      The point here being, new technology isn't always a good answer for everything.

    9. Re:Touch screens and the like by beelsebob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure I have, it's a lot easier than it is on a tiny physical keyboard.

    10. Re:Touch screens and the like by Starayo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Insightful my ass. I type almost as fast with my iPhone as I do with my keyboard. Feedback is available both visually (letter pops up to show which button you pressed) and audibly (click sounds). The odd slip of the finger is generally fixed by the iPhone's autocorrect too.

      The only people who continually raise the issue with this are people who haven't used the product, or have and are easily frustrated. Or they're too old to learn a slightly new trick. Even my dad can type quickly with an iPhone when he uses one, and says it's much better and easier than typing on the blackberry storm which also provides the physical feedback, but then again, the storm (first version at least) is an embarrassment of a phone.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Touch screens and the like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A Philips screwdriver and 15 minutes of your life will suffice to clean the inside of your mouse too.

      Unless it's an Apple mouse, which is sealed for all eternity and cannot be user-serviced.

    12. Re:Touch screens and the like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are quite possibly the most awesome poster in Slashdot history.

      We are all dumber for having read that, and may God have mercy on your soul. ;)

    13. Re:Touch screens and the like by Zalbik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I type almost as fast with my iPhone as I do with my keyboard.

      Sorry, but all that tells me is that you suck at using a keyboard. World records for texting have people completing a 160 character message at 40 seconds.
      See here and here.
      That works out to 48 words per minute, which is still very slow compare to even a novice touch-typist.

      You will also note that the world records are continually won by people using tactile keyboards.

      The only people who continually raise the issue with this are people who haven't used the product, or have and are easily frustrated. Or they're too old to learn a slightly new trick.

      Wow, over-generalize much?

      I could just as easily claim that the people who continually issues the iPhone keyboard are people who can actually type. Or that the the people who like the iPhone keyboard are rabid fanboi's who are so trapped in their Apple-worshiping love-fest that they can't see the obvious fact that a non-tactile keyboard is a pretty stupid way of communicating.

      But of course I won't.

    14. Re:Touch screens and the like by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bacon remnants are fairly easy to wipe (or indeed, lick) off a smooth surface like a touch pad.

      mentalimage.erase(slashdotposterwholicksbacon);

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    15. Re:Touch screens and the like by jason.sweet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Looks like a little tactile feedback on your 'C' would have helped.

    16. Re:Touch screens and the like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You never input text?

      People manage to input text fairly well on touchscreens without feedback. And have been for a while now.

      I think the issue at hand here is the difference between inputting text "fairly well" such that you can write pithy tweets or whatnot and inputting text "really well" such that you can write novels, code, etc, etc without suffering serious hand fatigue after the first couple paragraphs or code blocks.

      And please, save yourself the trouble of linking me to some jackass twat who's writing a "novel" entirely out of tweets written on his/her iPhone. I don't care who you dig up, his/her novel sucks.

    17. Re:Touch screens and the like by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless it's an Apple mouse, which is sealed for all eternity and cannot be user-serviced.

      When you only have a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. A most Apple mice really do look like nails most of the time...

      Just say'in.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:Touch screens and the like by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but all that tells me is that you suck at using a keyboard. ...
      Wow, over-generalize much?

      So you really don't see the irony there?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    19. Re:Touch screens and the like by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Us old folk might think "tech-savvy" is a bit generous for you iPhone-using youngsters.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    20. Re:Touch screens and the like by Genevish · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Problem with this, like with many other touch screen like devices, is that you don't get physical feedback when you're clicking or scrolling or doing anything."

      With the Apple mouse, there is a physical click. The entire top surface moves down for a click. The capacitive surface is just used to determine if it was a right or left click.

    21. Re:Touch screens and the like by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You DO realize that all of those text message records (except for the blindfolded one) were done on traditional number pads before touchscreen virtual keyboards even existed on phones, right? As in, typing a "c" would mean pressing the 1 button three times, rather than just hitting the "c" button on the virtual keyboard. The records are completely irrelevant when talking about modern smart phones with full QWERTY keyboards.

      I'm not in love with my iPhone's keyboard (tactile feedback would be nice), nor am I particularly gifted at using it (I don't have a texting plan and send e-mails rarely), but I'd place myself around 25-30 wpm. With practice, I'd imagine I could easily pass 40wpm. I'm not going to suggest that most people can type as quickly with an iPhone as with a normal keyboard (I certainly don't), but the records you're waving around as a counter-argument to his claims are entirely irrelevant and deserve to be pointed out as such.

    22. Re:Touch screens and the like by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Tech-savvy" is pretty fitting for us Unix-using youngsters. I explicitly put "style-conscious" as a separate group. Not everyone buys Macs because they're shiny; some people buy them because OS X is a Unix with nice features (like Grand Central) and an excellent GUI. And that's the people I referred to with "tech-savvy".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    23. Re:Touch screens and the like by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the issue at hand here is the difference between inputting text "fairly well" such that you can write pithy tweets or whatnot and inputting text "really well" such that you can write novels, code, etc, etc without suffering serious hand fatigue after the first couple paragraphs or code blocks.

      That wasn't and is not the issue at hand at all. Jurily supposed that the fact that the guy said he didn't have any problems with his iPhone's touchscreen meant that he must "never input text." He was just being a smartass.

      I contend that trying to input text "really well" on something like a fucking cell phone with buttons on the fold out keyboard instead of a touchscreen is an exercise in asstardery.

      That said, no one was discussing replacing the keyboard with some sort of touch pad, we were talking about inputting text on an iPhone. There are no cellphone equivalents upon which you would comfortably write slabs of code or a novel.

    24. Re:Touch screens and the like by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Philips screwdriver and 15 minutes of your life will suffice to clean the inside of your mouse too.

      Unless it's an Apple mouse, which is sealed for all eternity and cannot be user-serviced.

      Does it occur to you that the Magic Mouse, lacking buttons and balls, doesn't ever get dirty on the inside?

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
  2. R&D vs. Actual Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think anyone is denying that Microsoft R&D can churn out some interesting concepts from time to time, but there's a big difference between shipping an actual product with most of the details worked out, and merely mocking up a few prototypes that are nowhere close to being ready for actual sale. I'd be curious to see what prototypes Apple came up with before shipping the Magic Mouse. That'd be a more interesting comparison.

    1. Re:R&D vs. Actual Product by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how much would these MS prototypes cost the end-user? One that may be really awesome isn't going to be very practical if it is $700...

      And have they done ergonomics testing to see if these concepts hurt your wrist after a day of use?

      And how easy/hard is the configuration software? The user learning experience?

      Comparing a real shipping product to vaporware is just silly.

      I have an image in my head of a mind-controlled input device that simply takes the cursor wherever I want it, moves pages on a whim, and oh yeah it also does direct mind-to-text input. It also works in 3D environments, and allows multiple users to input into the same session. Mine is clearly better than any of these offerings. I win.

    2. Re:R&D vs. Actual Product by crosseyedatnite · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe the first consumer optical mouse would beg to differ.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/99/04/20/0214216/MS-Introduces-Optical-Mouse

      --
      e to the i pi equals negative one
    3. Re:R&D vs. Actual Product by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny how the article you refer to questions if the optical mouse was anything new even in 1999. Not to mention, of course, that said optical mouse was actually developed and built by Logitech and merely marketed under the Microsoft brand anyway.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    4. Re:R&D vs. Actual Product by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this is relevant... how? The GP complained about the article comparing Microsoft's prototypes to Apple's finished product. Yes, of course Microsoft has shipped mice before. That doesn't change the fact that Microsoft does not have a multitouch mouse on the market right now and most likely won't for another few months.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:R&D vs. Actual Product by ElSupreme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is the big advatage to a "multi touch" mouse. What does it offer that my Microsoft mouse doesn't do?
      Click. Both (but i leave my fingers on the surface of the mouse, will the Apple one require me to lift my right finger?)
      Right Click. Both. (same issue as above)
      Scroll up. Both (I have a nice wheel, it has acceleration and no indentations)
      Scroll sidways. Both (my wheel tilts sideways, never really needs use)
      Go back. Both (I assume there is some two touch swipe method for this, I have a back button)
      Zoom. Both? (pinching would require some weird scissor motion or repositioning your fingers, my mouse has a button)
      Middle click. MINE. (sure the apple mouse will probably get this but it only does 2 inputs now).

      Sure this sounds good and all but my mouse already does all of these things REALLY well.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
  3. They're all gimmicks. by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which multi-touch mouse do you want the most? Or are they all gimmicks?

    Nice card-forcing there.

    I like Microsoft's basic wheel mouse on Windows and Mac, and HP's 3-button optical mouse on X11.

  4. joke ? by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, seriously, they post crap like that on the Internet?

    This is a comparison of a finished product that is shipping today, against a number of prototypes, none of which you can buy anywhere and most of which you will never be able to buy. Most importantly, none of which are finished and ready for use. We're all living in the tech world. We've all seen at least a hundred videos of prototypes that we were really looking forward to - and the final product either never arrived or wasn't half as good as the demo had led us believe.

    Make a comparison when they're both shipping. Everything else is dumb, and creating false expectations.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:joke ? by kjart · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, seriously, they post crap like that on the Internet?

      You must be new here.

  5. Multi-touch "I'm a mac vs. pc commercial" by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm a mac" (Justin Long touches himself)
    "I'm a PC" (John Hodgeman touches himself)

    1. Re:Multi-touch "I'm a mac vs. pc commercial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'm a mac" (Justin Long touches himself)
      "I'm a PC" (John Hodgeman touches himself)

      I live in San Francisco and in the local version of the commercial they are touching each other.

  6. So many choices by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally, I'd buy one that provided solid Linux support. The Apple mouse looks pretty, and sounds functional, but I haven't heard of any Linux drivers. Anyone?

  7. Apple Mouse by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    So instead of having only one mouse button, Apple is getting rid of all of them?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Apple Mouse by czmax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple is moving the computer interface in a new direction. Apparently they were not satisfied with one, two, three (lets add some more!) button mice. I can imagine them asking what the value was of having "a little tiny keyboard that you slide around your desk", and subsequently deciding to do something different.

      Oddly they've taken the "multiple buttons is confusing" approach and leapt off a cliff. Have you watched a new user try to figure out one of the new apple trackpads? There is so little feedback that they have a hard time even understanding that there is a button available... and its seriously too bad if they meet up with a highly customized desktop supporting multiple gestures. I've noted that even experienced users need to take some time to figure out a peers configuration (concerning which corners do what).... but can you imagine what will happen as the gestures themselves become more and more customizable and as applications add their own gestures to the mix?

      This leads to my greatest complaint about the new Magic Mouse -- it doesn't behave the same as a trackpad. In effect having pushed back on movable "mice keyboards" they've also neglected to build a moveable "mice trackpad". Just because it is mounted onto a "mouse" and can be slid around on the desk is no reason, in my book, to introduce a bunch of different gestures and actions. I think they should instead simply mount a full featured trackpad there in mouse form factor. Rather than build their own set of "here is how gestures might be different on this device" instead they should have focused on making gestures customizable in general.

      We don't have a mechanism for customizing gestures today and I think there is a lot of software research on making that interface work better .... the hardware needs to be stabilized for a bit longer before that will happen though. I hope to see it soon.

      (All this, by the way, leaves your average windows trackpad in the dust; and it is good to see MS is at least experimenting with the ideas. I hope they find the flaws in Apples approach rather than trying to leapfrog in an entirely new direction).

    2. Re:Apple Mouse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I haven't seen any way in which the Magic Mouse's gestures differ from Apple's trackpad gestures, save for them using one finger less. If you can use an Apple trackpad under OS X you can use the Magic Mouse.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Apple Mouse by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you watched a new user try to figure out one of the new apple trackpads? There is so little feedback that they have a hard time even understanding that there is a button available... and its seriously too bad if they meet up with a highly customized desktop supporting multiple gestures. I've noted that even experienced users need to take some time to figure out a peers configuration (concerning which corners do what).... but can you imagine what will happen as the gestures themselves become more and more customizable and as applications add their own gestures to the mix?

      First Apple makes the, reasonable I think, assumption that the person logged in is the one currently at the computer. The guest account (or a new one) is meant for other users and it has a very simple and consistent setup. When you go to configure the gestures they are explained in the preference panel. No doubt gestures will become more configurable but it won't be through Apple but through third party software. It would be out of character for Apple to do anything but offer a basic set of gestures and lock its use down tightly.

      The feedback issue is subjective I think. Most gadgets these days are going "touch" and people who have handled something like an iphone would have little difficulty adjusting but I can see how it would be a problem for some.

      Magic Mouse -- it doesn't behave the same as a trackpad. In effect having pushed back on movable "mice keyboards" they've also neglected to build a moveable "mice trackpad".

      That was never the point. The Magic Mouse is an evolution of the Mighty Mouse, not a trackpad. If it were a trackpad there's be no point in making it movable and you'd end up with something like the Bamboo which looks interesting but is a niche product like trackballs. If you meant moveable as in "wireless" you can get such a thing now by using an app like Touchpad Pro for iphone BTW.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  8. Doll by Das+Auge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Show me on the doll where Microsoft and Apple multi-touched you inappropriately.

  9. An alternative to the Magic Mouse by chrysalis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you love the "touch" aspect of the Magic Mouse, an alternative is the Wacom Bamboo Touch tablet.

    It's roughly the same price as a Magic Mouse, it supports gestures just fine, the area makes it more comfortable than a mouse and best of all, you can also use it as a tablet.

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:An alternative to the Magic Mouse by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      They made one glaring design error with the Wacom (Daewoo) Bamboo Touch Tablet. When using in right hand mode, the buttons are on the left (so your thumb can hit it), unfortunately, so is the WIRE. Meaning you can't flush it up against your keyboard or something else. Regardless of where your computer is, in this design, the buttons and wire should be on opposite sides. If you want it on your left side, the wire should hang off the left side, not the right side. That alone says "cheap knockoff".

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    2. Re:An alternative to the Magic Mouse by cbreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it work like the TouchPad on Mac Books gesture wise? I am mainly interested in the basic gestures such as click and dragging.

  10. Lifting fingers... by amaupin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So with my current mouse I can rest my finger on the mouse button, and press down when I want to click.

    With these new mice, when I want to click I have to lift my finger up from the surface of the mouse and then press down (if the video in the article is indicative of how it functions). I think constantly lifting my finger would become tiring.

    1. Re:Lifting fingers... by HogGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not with the Apple Product.

      I'm using one now, and there is a "tactical" feel for the actual click...

    2. Re:Lifting fingers... by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think constantly lifting my finger would become tiring.

      Someone definitely needs to get more physical exercise, me thinks.

    3. Re:Lifting fingers... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not just you, it tires out George Jetson as well!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Lifting fingers... by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you should actually try USING one before deciding how intuitive or nonintuitive it is. It's actually a really fantastic mouse.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  11. Advantages? by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apart from probably gaming, I have difficulties to get a grasp of the advantages of the concept, especially if compared to a multi-touch tablet.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  12. Both Microsoft and Apple have introduced, eh? by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Microsoft designs are all still prototypes. I would say that one of the two companies have "introduced" a multi-touch mouse. The other is currently researching a way to copy it (as always) and quite possibly playing with themselves. This design makes it look like you are holding a nutsack

    On the bright side, I have a magic mouse now and will say that it really is a whole new (awesome) experience.

  13. "Tame improvement" by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    The Magic Mouse is a straightforward application of multi-touch to mousing and is a tame improvement compared with Microsoft's more radical designs.

    ...and by "tame" we mean "already living peacefully in people's houses." And by "radical" we mean "awesome in theory."

  14. What??? by sean.peters · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dude, without any kind of tactile feedback, you have to look at the keyboard, instead of looking at the text you're typing. How can that not be a problem? Reasonable people can disagree over whether that means tactile feedback is "nice-to-have" or "critical", but let's not pretend the issue doesn't even exist.

    1. Re:What??? by Azureflare · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, you have to look at the keyboard if you can't feel it? What happened to memorizing key positions and how far you have to move your fingers (muscle memory)?

      Maybe it's easier for some people than others. I got the iPhone 1st gen the day after it released and have never had problems typing on it. After the first week or so, I didn't need to look at the keyboard either.

    2. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't understand why you have to look at the keyboard instead of the text.

      By Looking at the text, you see what you're entering; what does looking at the keyboard tell you that the screen does not? Unless you're comparing someone who can type without looking in the first place to someone who has too, in which case the argument seems strange to me.

    3. Re:What??? by Sulphur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you have to look at your mouse?

    4. Re:What??? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe it's easier for some people than others. I got the iPhone 1st gen the day after it released and have never had problems typing on it. After the first week or so, I didn't need to look at the keyboard either

      i kwno what you men. i nevrr ook ay my ketboared while tyoiung thingd either.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    5. Re:What??? by profplump · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe you've got some sort magic, GPS-enabled muscle memory, but most of us can't reliably re-position our hands over a particular position without some sort of reference -- that's why your home row has those handy little bumps. Given the number of times a day an average person moves from keyboard to mouse and back the initial positioning of the mousing hand is a significant concern.

      And muscle memory fails entirely if you need to make *any* little change, like sitting slightly to the side of the keyboard, or even adjusting the height of your chair; keys provide the ability to re-align your typing in-flight, without needing to look at the keyboard, or to do some sort of error analysis of the output to determine the modality of the current misalignment.

    6. Re:What??? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For one thing, there's tactile feedback with a mouse. It's pretty substantial. Secondly, yes. I'd argue that you look at your mouse pretty constantly, because most people tend to watch the mouse cursor when they're using the mouse.

  15. How to prevent finger movement = mouse movement? by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The title of this comment should be "How do these mice prevent finger movement from causing mouse movement", but due to the limits /. places on comment titles....

    OK, so let us say I have the Mac Mouse, and I swipe my fingers over the surface to do a horizontal scroll of a document.
    * How do I prevent my finger motion from moving the mouse itself, and thus the pointer of the mouse?
    * Does the mouse have such a high coefficient of static friction that the CoF between my fingers and the shell * the force my fingers apply is too small to break the mouse loose?
    * What does that imply about normal mouse usage?
    ** Will I lose the ability to move the mouse by small amounts due to the stiction?
    ** Will I have to completely change my grip on the mouse to transition from mousing to swiping?

  16. An issue with the story by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA:

    This is arguably the first substantial improvement to the mouse since it was invented in 1968 by Doug Englebart.

    Ok, can't agree with this one. Since then we've added the scroll wheel, which was a huge improvement in mouse technology. If you don't believe me, try going back to a plain two-button mouse, and then work with a document bigger than your screen. You used to spend your life moving back and forth between the scroll bar and the text. We've also, for the most part, done away with crappy ball mice in favor of the light tracking ones, which eliminated the sticky mouse problem.

    Multi-touch may turn out to be a big deal, but it's certainly a stretch to say that mice haven't improved substantially since '68.

  17. I sold my magic mouse :O by dindi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So here is the deal: I ordered a Magic mouse and after an hour of use I put it back in the packaging and sold it to a colleague.

    Why ?

    The idea is great, the functions are not. Not being able to pinch, rotate and zoom without a key is one (stupid) thing, considering that the mouse can track 4 fingers.

    Accidental actions (scroll mostly) is annoying. A button or ball moves when you move it, this thing tracks every touch, that annoyed me to hell.

    Having no 3rd button however is an absolute deal breaker. I would live with a 3-finger touch, or 2 finger tap, but the lack of buttons just made me pack it and sell it.

    And do not get me wrong, I use the Mightly mouse and several Logi trackballs and only Mac aluminium keyboards (except on my Macbook)...

    I think the hardware is awesome but the drivers absolutely SUCK!

    Just my 2c.

    ps: the optical touch tracking looks interesting on the videos... maybe I would try that next... .or just stay with my logis.

    1. Re:I sold my magic mouse :O by At0miC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Looks like these guys have an app that is adding the functionality you want... http://blog.boastr.net/

  18. Re:How to prevent finger movement = mouse movement by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 3, Informative

    The title of this comment should be "How do these mice prevent finger movement from causing mouse movement", but due to the limits /. places on comment titles....

    OK, so let us say I have the Mac Mouse, and I swipe my fingers over the surface to do a horizontal scroll of a document.
    * How do I prevent my finger motion from moving the mouse itself, and thus the pointer of the mouse?
    * Does the mouse have such a high coefficient of static friction that the CoF between my fingers and the shell * the force my fingers apply is too small to break the mouse loose?

    For scrolling, it works the same way as any mouse with a physical scroll wheel. You steady the mouse with your thumb on one side, and your pinkie, ring, and (possibly) middle fingers on the other, and stroke with your index finger. You don't end up knocking your mouse around when you poke at the scroll wheel, do you?

    ** Will I have to completely change my grip on the mouse to transition from mousing to swiping?

    Well, the multi-finger back/forward gestures are a bit trickier, since your index and middle fingers moving together aren't as dextrous as your index finger alone. The "back" gesture is pretty simple--you lift your pinkie and ring fingers off, but leave your thumb to counter the force of the swipe--but the opposite "forward" gesture is darned near impossible for me. Luckily, you don't navigate forward as often as you go back, but still.

    The video on the Apple site helps.

    Having played with one for a brief period:
    - Normal tracking and clicking is no different from any other mouse
    - Both X and Y scrolling is very natural and intuitive.
    - The optional "scroll with momentum" is annoying and distracting to me, but might be familiar to iPhone users.
    - Right clicking requires lifting your left finger. Easy enough to get used to, but not natural.
    - Back and Forward gestures are cool, but would take some serious effort to get used to.
    - The mouse is very low and flat.