Slashdot Mirror


Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages

An anonymous reader writes "Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks. The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse. Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort."

69 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. So much raw data by Shrike82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.

    --
    You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    1. Re:So much raw data by megamerican · · Score: 5, Informative

      Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.

      The NORAD tapes, which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people. The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because "it wouldn't be good for the country."

      John Farmer, senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said, "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [during 9/11]"

      6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.
      http://patriotsquestion911.com/

      “More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques,” writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast. “In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.”

      We've been lied to about 9/11 from day one. It needs to be investigated further. If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something isn't right. Burying your head deeper into the sand won't help.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    2. Re:So much raw data by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You scared me for a second with your username. I thought I had posted that without even realizing it.

    3. Re:So much raw data by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If there was a conspiracy to find about 9/11, what do you think it would turn out to be?

      A. A concerted effort by the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies conspiring together to launch an attack on the US people in order to further the aims of the Government and selected private corporations and individuals.

      Or...

      B. A concerted effort by members of the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies to cover up their own inadequecies in being able to deal with an attack by a small number of persons against several targets using simplistic weapons, causing a massive over reaction over the next few years, and resulting in the inability of the largest military might in the world to subdue a country that has barely hit the 19th Century.

      Yes, there probably was a lie surrounding 9/11, but its almost certainly not the juicy one people are fantasising about...

    4. Re:So much raw data by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      fnord.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:So much raw data by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can't I have both?

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    6. Re:So much raw data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Follow the money....

      If you wanted the USA to have the tallest building in the world again, where would you put it? Would you build it in some developing city that couldn't support the occupancy of the building to make money? Montgomery Alabama? Little Rock Arkansas? No....

      You would build it in the most populace cities. The largest cities that can support that kind of building and still make money off of it are all out of land. So, what is someone to do... Knock down some of the existing buildings and build a bigger one. Do you know what the cost would be to bring down an existing building in New York? One can only imagine. Do you know what it would take to get it approved through the city council?

      Come up with some terror threat, and bring down the buildings. No fussing with all the red tape. Jesse Ventura is very vocal in saying that with all his demolition experience in the Navy Seals, to him the buildings were detonated.

      Do you know how extremely hard it is to bring down a building completely vertical? Just watching some of the shows on the Discovery channel will tell you that. If that were the case, demolition crews from now on would be using airplanes instead of the weeks if not months of preparing a building to come down.

      So, now there is space in the most populated city in the US to build the worlds tallest building, the American public even get to foot the bill for building it and the American Government gets the war in Iraq that they have been hoping for even if it is the longest stretch ever to connect the two.

      Also to me there has to be something magic about an airplane disappearing into a 6 foot wide hole in the pentagon.

      If this was nothing but terrorism, the three buildings would have been built back by now 8 years later. Atleast one of them.

    7. Re:So much raw data by Stupid+McStupidson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's mostly because you have a gross misunderstanding of how the military works. When something gets fucked up, somebody is responsible for the fuck up. While that statement at first makes you say, "Well, duh!" you need to understand how it functions in the military. That statement is an absolute truth. There are no "whoops, nobody's fault" moments in the military. If something fucked up, SOMEBODY fucked up, and therefore, SOMEBODY will pay. Usually an officer is in charge, a relatively minor fuck up might be a slap on the wrist. A moderate fuck up, or a string of minor ones will result in a bad evaluation report which will prevent your promotion, and essentially make you a dead man walking. Major fuck ups are the end of your career. There isn't a chart somewhere delineating all the fuck-up degrees, but I'm sure as they watched iconic building collapsing in flames, they assumed it was pretty major. This results in many waves of ass-covering, as really major fuck ups tend to take out swaths of officers and NCO's. To a third party observer, the ass covering to save yourself from the "SOMEBODY will pay" maxim probably seems sinister..as if they were hiding something. But in reality, they are just trying to hide what they assume to be their vulnerable behinds.

    8. Re:So much raw data by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stop it. Just stop it. Not only are you a coward by posting anonymously, but the nine mile debris field has been debunked REPEATEDLY, including by police officers on the scene.

      The nine mile debris field consisted of bits of paper which may or may not have been from the flight when it impacted in the field.

      Further, that nine mile figure is bogus. People used MapQuest to find the distance between the crash site and the supposed debris field. Sure, nine miles if you drive by road, but roughly 2.5 miles in a straight line.

      The debris field WAS NOT composed of engine parts, seats, body parts or anything else heavier than a piece of paper.

      Your friend is also an idiot as there are nearly a dozen eyewitnesses to the plane coming down, some of which watched the plane, intact, nose dive into the ground. Had the plane been shot down, it would have displayed some semblance of damage including smoke and/or fire trailing from it. Not one eyewitness described seeing anything of the sort.

      End of story, full stop.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    9. Re:So much raw data by Digital+Autumn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like this was crafted to be the most ludicrous example of a conspiracy theory ever. The whole thing was because someone wanted the U.S. to have the tallest building in the world??? Using Jesse Ventura as expert testimony?? I'm presuming this was all meant as an ironic example of conspiracy thinking. There's conspiracy theories out there can make you stop and go hmm, it makes good sense. Then there's this one. I can just see Cheney rubbing his hands, an evil glint in his eye. "Which country will have the tallest building now?! Mwa ha ha ha."

    10. Re:So much raw data by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A friend of mine works at Center, and he told me that the air force shot down flight 93.

      No he doesn't. Its not called 'Center' In the air pilots refer the the control center they are currently being directed by as 'center' for radio purposes, but thats where it ends.

      There isn't one 'center'. There are several around the country for handling that general area of the country, they all have names, employees don't refer to themselves as 'working at Center' They work at something like the Air Traffic Control Center, or the Washington ATRCC so people would actually know wtf they are talking about.

      Stop watching bad movies and air emergency on discovery channel and thinking you know anything about how it works in the real world.

      Your story is probably just crap made up by a 15 year old.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  2. Re:News to me by rainmaestro · · Score: 2, Informative

    You still see them in the medical community (ER docs, nurses, etc), but that's about the only place I ever seen them nowadays.

  3. Re:News to me by DJ+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative
    Most hospital physicians still use them for a few reasons.
    • There are no dead zones
    • They are easier to page than a cell phone (any nurse can pick up the nearest land line, no need to text)
    • They don't interfere with medical equipment (which is becoming less of a concern lately)
  4. Lizards? by jDeepbeep · · Score: 4, Informative

    What next 7 foot lizards are real now?

    Yes.

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:Lizards? by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

      What next 7 foot lizards are real now?

      Yes.

      Think you're mistaken; they've only got four feet.

    2. Re:Lizards? by qazsedcft · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you even click that link? The first paragraph of the text states that they grow to an average length of 2 to 3 metres (6.6 to 9.8 ft). Check the pictures if you don't believe it.

    3. Re:Lizards? by amstrad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Woosh! Something just flew over your head.

  5. Re:News to me by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pagers can be more reliable than TM. And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping. Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway. Not everyone has a cell phone. (I don't) A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers, not text messaging. (volunteer fire departments are good examples) Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability. Lots of reasons to stick with pagers.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  6. Re:News to me by Tteddo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have one!! I don't have a phone either. And I am in IT. And yes, the young-ins make fun of me.

  7. that's nice by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure this will lead to rational debate, as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11, rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories.

    Also, when you bring me my pony, make sure it's pink.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:that's nice by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I imagine a whole lot of people are going to be pissed when they learn that the data was intercepted back in 2001.

    2. Re:that's nice by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's taken that long to redact / doctor the messages which aren't in line wi687B(R&^bv9NO CARRIER

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  8. Re:News to me by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize that 9/11 occurred over eight years ago. Even if pagers didn't exist now, they did exist then.

  9. Good Move by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks. Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks. What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing. Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing. Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB." This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads. Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect. My personal opinions are far to complex to list here, but people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  10. Who needs to make backups anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs to make backups anymore? The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you. Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit.

    1. Re:Who needs to make backups anymore? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tag all my posts and emails with a serial # so that if I lose any, I can just ask the NSA and by having the serial # handy, it makes their jobs all that much easier.

      (#327382)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  11. Re:News to me by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plus they are the only comm devices allowed in classified facilities.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  12. Self aware computer systems? by feedayeen · · Score: 5, Funny

    "computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse" 8:46 a.m. - "Ow, something hit me!" 8:47 a.m. - "Anyone else smell smoke?" 8:47 a.m. - "Admin has logged off" 10:28 a.m. - "System failure"

    1. Re:Self aware computer systems? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably 'network failure to server A,' 'network failure to server B,' 'system is down,' 'UPS power offline'. It depends on how the server is sending the data. A lot will use email to SMS relays, which will stop working as soon as the network goes down, but some may be using built-in GSM hardware (GSM transmitters that can send SMS are pretty cheap) so that they can notify the admin if the network goes down. In this case, they will keep sending until the server is disconnected from the UPS or flattened by impact with the ground, whichever happens first.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Self aware computer systems? by rapiddescent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I was working at Reuters in London at the time and the first we knew of the disaster was an automated alert from our trading system saying that Merrylls and APM had gone fully offline (these types of systems very very rarely go offline). At the same moment, one of the data feeds went DR (DataScope I think) - it had its DR facility in the other tower and so only lasted a short time before going off for good.

  13. Some really touching messages, like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    2001-09-11 09:05:13 Metrocall [0902425] C ALPHA HQFPSCORP2:Backup Exec Job Failed

    That one brings a tear to my eye.

  14. It's not just 9/11 related pager messages by rbb · · Score: 4, Funny
    In this file I noticed a message that, in hindsight, is especially morbid:

    Good morning. I haven't heard from you in a while. I'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you don't page me back. Have a good day. Todd

    --
    In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
    1. Re:It's not just 9/11 related pager messages by csartanis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This one bothers me a bit!


      2001-09-11 10:20:40 Skytel [002840776] C ALPHA Hi, I need you to call me to tell me you are ok. Everyone is calling me and is very worried about you! If you can't get thru, can you send me an email or a fax or something. Just worried about you and wish you

    2. Re:It's not just 9/11 related pager messages by csartanis · · Score: 3, Interesting


      2001-09-11 10:20:42 Skytel [002840776] C ALPHA were home! I love you! T

      Found the rest.

  15. Pagers were working? by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.

    I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that *was* working that day was the Internet...phones, both land line and cell were unavailable. We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan (we were in Brooklyn) and every phone we tried, including the pay phone down the street (still had 'em back then...) gave us the "fast busy signal", indicating "We didn't even try to make your call..."

    So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where. Bad times...bad times.

  16. Re:News For Nerds Anyone??!! by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tech related: intercepted private pager messages from a variety of sources. Someone managed to collate these en-masse and distribute them.
    Politically related (Slashdot has a politics section): suggestion of interception and storage of pager messages on a grand scale beyond that needed for operational reasons (this is 24-hours worth, don't forget, from several sources).
    Privacy related: A release of otherwise private information, including private communications between ordinary people, presumably gathered direct from telco's, to a website known for doing that with politically-sensitive material. If nothing else, this shows you where your "private communications" end up when you're texting something erotic to your girlfriend... not "analysed", not "anonymised", just saved onto a disk somewhere at the telco for a random person to collect and leak to the Internet.

    I think it's relevant and I have zero interest in 9/11, conspiracy theories, or even most of the things the US does.

  17. I Can't Wait... by Black-Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    For that text pager message: "Finished arming the detonating device, Herr Cheney".

  18. Twitter next by JerryQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After the next major event it will be the twitter stream which will be subject to such analysis

  19. Re:Good Move by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd question the ethics of it. The very existence of this database is of huge political and social importance, thus falling under Wikileaks' remit, but by putting it into the public domain they're infringing the privacy of the citizens involved even further. You can bet all the TLAs, not to mention police forces, lawyers, insurance companies, and so on are having fun with it now it's in public view.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  20. Re:News For Nerds Anyone??!! by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can there be moderation for editors please? I love how comments can be modded to oblivion, but useless editors and stories can't.

    If you log in then you can hide stories from particular editors (like that newbie CmdrTaco). Also, you have the chance to mod a story down using the Firehose before it gets approved.

    Finally, there is also the option of just not clicking on the link if you are not interested in the story. Woah, I've gone too far there!

  21. Re:News to me by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You've never known anybody who is on call? SMS is unreliable, and if you're paying someone to be on-call, you want their service to be reliable. You don't want the message "Critical production server down, administrator needed" to be delayed 15 minutes because of some SMS issue. It doesn't matter nearly as much if "LOL, at movies" gets delayed, but the on-call message can literally be worth thousands of dollars per minute it is delayed. Of course on-call folks have cell phones too, but the pager tends to be the first method of communication employed.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  22. Re:News to me by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.

    Some are. Mine is. I used to have an old LG phone that sounded exactly like an old fashioned landline phone, the kind with a real bell in it. It was loud enough to wake you up, too.

    I use my phone for an alarm clock.

  23. Re:News to me by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Informative

        At one place I worked years ago, we used pagers. As cell phones became more popular, we stared switching over to them. Every once in a while, we'd test to see which ones worked better. Text messages emailed to the phones were usually faster than the alphanumeric pagers. In time, we ditched the pagers entirely, since they were slower to receive, and we felt silly carrying around too many devices.

        For completeness of coverage, the messages were sent to 5 different people via two methods each. Usually it was email and phone. If there was an emergency, and no admins checked in, the phone calls started going out. Most events were handled in 5 minutes, even if the primary person was unavailable. That wasn't bad considering not everything happened during normal working hours. Actually, most emergencies didn't happen during normal working hours. That would have made them too easy. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  24. Re:News to me by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pagers still exist?

    These are texts and pages from 9/11/2001, which is some 8 years ago.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  25. Re:News to me by Twisted+Willie · · Score: 2, Informative

    SMS is unreliable? Where?

    Unreliable as in you get no guarantees if and when a message will actually be delivered. Try to find a carrier anywhere that offers you a contract with an SLA on SMS delivery. Granted, you won't often run into problems with SMS, but if you are bound by an SLA with a customer, you'd better have your underpinning contracts (yay for ITIL terminology) at the same level as that SLA.

  26. Mmmm by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wikileaks is simply an outlet for sensitive information. So what you're implying is that their privacy wasn't infringed by whichever entity collected the information, but by Wikileaks? That doesn't make any sense. I do see your point, but I think the potential benefits by far outweigh the cons of such a release. Now that the data is out there, nothing can be done to get it back. On top of this, Wikileaks has some serious credibility when it comes to their methods and what and when they decide to release, I'm sure their lawyers have thought out the consequences and variations thoroughly. Their statement as to the source is “While we are obligated ... to protect our sources, it is clear that the information comes from an organization which has been intercepting and archiving national US telecommunications since prior to 9/11.” If anything, THIS is what people SHOULD be mad about, that a (potentially governmental) organization has been collecting this data without their consent in the first place.

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  27. Re:News to me by Courageous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still see them in use for certain IT folks in the defense industry. The key is that they will permit them into secure facilities, as the old one-way versions cannot transmit.

  28. The middle by copponex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read the Project for a New American Century's statement of principles here. Now read the PNAC letter to Clinton on Iraq here. Note that Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Jeb are all big supporters. Now read about their plans here.

    The choice quote is: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

    My theory is that they had intelligence stating that the attack was going to happen. Just as many suspect happened at Pearl Harbor, they deliberately stood down defenses in order to get the catalyzing event that they need in order to enact foreign military operations. They may have done this truly believing it was in the best interests of the country, but the truth needs to come out, and those responsible punished.

    I don't think they knew that the towers would collapse. It explains the look on George when he was first told we were under attack, and the look on his face during his address.

    1. Re:The middle by fluffy99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very similar to Pearl Harbor, no? The administrator knew something was coming, and indirectly wanted it to happen to get public opinion in favor of entering the war. There is even evidence that it was known that Pearl Harbor was the target and the date, as all the high-value ships were conveniently pulled out of port shortly beforehand. All the ships lost were low value ships due to be decommissioned in the near future. There is even evidence that the Japanese coded transmissions had been deciphered so someone knew the plan, and the incoming planes had been spotted on radar (whether this info intentionally not acted on is up for debate).

      I have no doubt our govt something was coming, and likely wanted it to happen to get public opinion behind invading the middle east again. Condolezza Rice published a report that predicted airplanes as the weapons.

  29. Re:News to me by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never met anyone who had a pager, I've never seen a pager in real life or heard of anyone using one outside the US.

    Your experience must be limited to geographical areas with pervasive cell network coverage.

    I live in an area of NH with moderate coverage, but prefer to head up to the mountains for R&R. But I'm on-call, so I carry a pager, it works nearly everywhere (cell phone start working again well above tree-line).

    I use procmail to duplicate messages to pager + SMS - between the two coverage is nearly 100%.

    Pager is $15mo for alpha paging (longer messages than SMS) and my pager (Motorola design made in China) runs about two months on a AA. It will give me a warning about the battery a few days before it gets really low, and then beep at me annoyingly for a couple days before the battery is dead.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  30. Reichstag would vote A by 1800maxim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was Reichstag fire just as unbelievable as 9/11? It was done to further gov't agenda.

    From Wikipedia: The Reichstag fire... is seen as pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.

    Don't think gov'ts now aren't capable of the same thing, or that they aren't doing it.

    But then it's much more comfortable to bury one's head in the sand.

  31. Re:News to me by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a pager as a workplace emergency responder. I too have the messages sent as text to my (private) cell phone, and I receive them as a work email.

    In general my phone and the email arrive simultaneously, followed about a minute later by the pager.

    That said, at least once the phone text message stopped working when my cell phone provider changed something. At our last ERT group meeting last week, when we did a test page, at least two members did not get the texts (including one who had the week prior during an actual emergency). He was on AT someone just next to him also on AT&T got the page.

    Ultimately, we have a big team and could probably afford a few members missing the texts if we switched away from pagers entirely. However, after-hours emergencies are triggered by the security company rather than the building receptionists, and the third-party security company's system can only send numeric mass pages, not emails, so we can't switch.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  32. Re:News to me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are no dead zones

    Not true. They're RF devices and suffer the same limitations as any other radio receiver. With most pagers, they are not bidirectional and so if you are in a dead zone the person sending the message does not get any notification that the delivery failed or was delayed.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  33. Re:News to me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    SMS is more reliable in this sense than a pager message. If a receiving mobile is out of radio range then it will be buffered for retransmit. Pagers are receive-only devices and don't send acknowledgements, so if they are out of range when the message is sent the message is permanently lost. My father used to have a pager but his company switched to sending SMS because at least then he'd get messages late, while previously he would sometimes never get them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  34. Re:News to me by DarrenBaker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh. You're THAT guy.

  35. Re:News to me by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everywhere. The protocols used don't provide for guaranteed delivery.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  36. Re:Good Move by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All the TLAs almost certainly had access to it already. Putting it in the public domain means that the public now has more of a clue about the amount of information the TLAs have on them. If it leads to more opposition to things like the USAPATRIOT Act then it will have served a beneficial purpose.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. Re:Good Move by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd question the ethics of it. The very existence of this database is of huge political and social importance, thus falling under Wikileaks' remit, but by putting it into the public domain they're infringing the privacy of the citizens involved even further. You can bet all the TLAs, not to mention police forces, lawyers, insurance companies, and so on are having fun with it now it's in public view.

    Exactly- and especially true when you browse through and see messages like " " Andre-are you at work today? Gimme a call - 301-555-5555. Gerry". (number obviously changed in my repost) There's no doubt that these people will be targeted for 9/11-related scams and other obnoxious behavior in short order. You think Gerry's not already getting a call from someone looking to cash in, or who just thinks they're being funny?

    If this list were filtered so that it was just automated systems, non-personal, etc , that's fine -- but doing it in this way is just opening the door for all the abuse and stupidity that we're capable of. As it is - it's a gross breach of privacy, published in a way that ensures that there will be no accountability for any abuse of personal information found in it.

  38. 08:58:33 by Spacezilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2001-09-11 08:58:33 Skytel [002399634] A ALPHA Initial reports indictate that AAL11, B767, after initial hijacking on flight from BOS-LAX, has crashed into the side of the World Trade Center in NY. ATCSCC/bl

    That was an insane amount of detail at a point when everyone else was going: "It's possible something may have happened somewhere."

  39. Classless post by darkpixel2k · · Score: 3, Funny
    Damn it--it looks like the terrorists stopped a Microsoft Exchange event...

    7 Skytel [002380116] B ALPHA Frank.Heisler@ubsw.com|FW: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED| -----Original Message----- From: Bucher, Gisela Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: DL-Perot-STAM-Permanent Cc: Subject: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED

    This confuses me greatly. On one hand I utterly despise the terrorists for what they did...but I really hate Exchange too...

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  40. Re:News to me by Albanach · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While you might be used to SMSs arriving instantly, they very often do not.

    This, too, seems to be a peculiarly US problem. I've heard of many many more lost and delayed SMSs in the US than in Europe. Perhaps that's because Europe has been making significant use of text messaging for far longer, so the systems there are now more reliable?

    Perhaps US users just have lower expectations, so cell networks can get away with such things?

  41. Re:News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed, another side effect of the dead zone with a two way pager is the same page will come to the pager multiple times at random time intervals. It makes it confusing because you don't know if the person paged you again or if it was a repeat. I've been burned both way with that, I've called clients an hour later when they were sleeping and I've ignored what I thought were repeats missing an attempt by a client to contact me. Both times I had to explain myself by comparing my house location on Google maps to the Skytel coverage map to my boss and the client. I thought it was odd that people really thought that a pager just worked everywhere. What made the whole thing even more frustrating was every time I was on call I explained to everyone that it did not work at my house and had the emails to prove I had told them.

  42. Wow, I wonder if my texts are in there... by Fritz+T.+Coyote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I am a New Yorker. Yes, I was in the city that day. My Cellphone was useless, probably due to a combination of losing a major relay point, and everybody in town trying to use their phones at the same time. Landlines were flakey (probably due to losing a major chunk of the infrastructure). My Obsolete and Archaic text pager kept working. (I wonder if the pager "I'm OK, R U OK?"messages I exchanged with my sister are in this archive?)

  43. I don't think it's complete by Tweezer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I searched a whole bunch of these for the word "fuck" and couldn't find a single instance. I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why don't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC.

  44. Re:News to me by pluther · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's just the opposite of my experience.

    Several years ago I was working on a contract where I was frequently on call, and carried a pager.

    After a while, they upgraded my responsibilities, and decided that the calls I would be answering after hours were too important to allow delays and issued me a cell phone.

    The main difference is that when you call someone on the cell phone, you know immediately if they've gotten the call - with a pager, there's no feedback until the person locates a phone and calls you back. So you don't know if the person got your page and will be calling you back soon, or if you should escalate to the next person on the list.

    Communication with a cell phone is just about as reliable, and always faster.

    Oh, yeah, and you can call from any phone. See, in addition to SMS, many cell phones also allow voice communication.

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  45. Re:Diesel fuel fire by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Informative

    WTC 7 was NOT a hardened building. It was constructed in the early 80s as a run of the mill office building. The only thing unique about it was the unusual arrangement of the load-bearing members. This was needed because the thing was constructed on top of a massive utility vault. The Emergency Command Center was shoehorned into the building and not everyone thought the location made any sense for obvious reasons. (It was located there AFTER the '93 bombing)

    As for the collapse, it looks "controlled" because buildings don't usually fall down for any reason other than controlled demolition. That's the only point of reference most people have. That aside, physics ensure that buildings tend to fall straight down, or twist a little and then fall straight down.

    But if you want more in-depth detail about how stresses were distributed and how the building was comprimised, then check out this link or or this one.

  46. Re:News to me by tuxicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pagers operate at a lower frequency than cell phones, the likelihood of a dead zone is lower.

  47. Re:News to me by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm clueless as to how pagers work, but SMS does not have guaranteed delivery.

    Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS#GSM

    "Message delivery is best effort, so there are no guarantees that a message will actually be delivered to its recipient and delay or complete loss of a message is not uncommon, particularly when sending between networks."

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  48. Re:Global warming a conspiracy, maybe 911 is too by leoxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like the email that brought down global warming, this pager evidence is pretty damned convincing.

    Slashdot in a nutshell.