Slashdot Mirror


Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages

An anonymous reader writes "Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks. The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse. Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort."

24 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Lizards? by jDeepbeep · · Score: 4, Informative

    What next 7 foot lizards are real now?

    Yes.

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:Lizards? by duguk · · Score: 5, Funny

      What next 7 foot lizards are real now?

      Yes.

      Think you're mistaken; they've only got four feet.

  2. Re:News to me by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pagers can be more reliable than TM. And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping. Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway. Not everyone has a cell phone. (I don't) A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers, not text messaging. (volunteer fire departments are good examples) Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability. Lots of reasons to stick with pagers.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  3. that's nice by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure this will lead to rational debate, as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11, rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories.

    Also, when you bring me my pony, make sure it's pink.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:that's nice by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I imagine a whole lot of people are going to be pissed when they learn that the data was intercepted back in 2001.

    2. Re:that's nice by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's taken that long to redact / doctor the messages which aren't in line wi687B(R&^bv9NO CARRIER

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  4. Who needs to make backups anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs to make backups anymore? The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you. Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit.

    1. Re:Who needs to make backups anymore? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tag all my posts and emails with a serial # so that if I lose any, I can just ask the NSA and by having the serial # handy, it makes their jobs all that much easier.

      (#327382)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. Re:News to me by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plus they are the only comm devices allowed in classified facilities.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  6. Re:So much raw data by megamerican · · Score: 5, Informative

    Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.

    The NORAD tapes, which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people. The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because "it wouldn't be good for the country."

    John Farmer, senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said, "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [during 9/11]"

    6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.
    http://patriotsquestion911.com/

    “More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques,” writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast. “In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.”

    We've been lied to about 9/11 from day one. It needs to be investigated further. If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something isn't right. Burying your head deeper into the sand won't help.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  7. Self aware computer systems? by feedayeen · · Score: 5, Funny

    "computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse" 8:46 a.m. - "Ow, something hit me!" 8:47 a.m. - "Anyone else smell smoke?" 8:47 a.m. - "Admin has logged off" 10:28 a.m. - "System failure"

    1. Re:Self aware computer systems? by rapiddescent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I was working at Reuters in London at the time and the first we knew of the disaster was an automated alert from our trading system saying that Merrylls and APM had gone fully offline (these types of systems very very rarely go offline). At the same moment, one of the data feeds went DR (DataScope I think) - it had its DR facility in the other tower and so only lasted a short time before going off for good.

  8. It's not just 9/11 related pager messages by rbb · · Score: 4, Funny
    In this file I noticed a message that, in hindsight, is especially morbid:

    Good morning. I haven't heard from you in a while. I'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you don't page me back. Have a good day. Todd

    --
    In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
  9. Pagers were working? by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.

    I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that *was* working that day was the Internet...phones, both land line and cell were unavailable. We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan (we were in Brooklyn) and every phone we tried, including the pay phone down the street (still had 'em back then...) gave us the "fast busy signal", indicating "We didn't even try to make your call..."

    So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where. Bad times...bad times.

  10. Re:So much raw data by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If there was a conspiracy to find about 9/11, what do you think it would turn out to be?

    A. A concerted effort by the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies conspiring together to launch an attack on the US people in order to further the aims of the Government and selected private corporations and individuals.

    Or...

    B. A concerted effort by members of the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies to cover up their own inadequecies in being able to deal with an attack by a small number of persons against several targets using simplistic weapons, causing a massive over reaction over the next few years, and resulting in the inability of the largest military might in the world to subdue a country that has barely hit the 19th Century.

    Yes, there probably was a lie surrounding 9/11, but its almost certainly not the juicy one people are fantasising about...

  11. I Can't Wait... by Black-Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    For that text pager message: "Finished arming the detonating device, Herr Cheney".

  12. Re:News to me by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pagers still exist?

    These are texts and pages from 9/11/2001, which is some 8 years ago.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  13. Re:So much raw data by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can't I have both?

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  14. Re:News to me by Courageous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still see them in use for certain IT folks in the defense industry. The key is that they will permit them into secure facilities, as the old one-way versions cannot transmit.

  15. Reichstag would vote A by 1800maxim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was Reichstag fire just as unbelievable as 9/11? It was done to further gov't agenda.

    From Wikipedia: The Reichstag fire... is seen as pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.

    Don't think gov'ts now aren't capable of the same thing, or that they aren't doing it.

    But then it's much more comfortable to bury one's head in the sand.

  16. Re:News to me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    SMS is more reliable in this sense than a pager message. If a receiving mobile is out of radio range then it will be buffered for retransmit. Pagers are receive-only devices and don't send acknowledgements, so if they are out of range when the message is sent the message is permanently lost. My father used to have a pager but his company switched to sending SMS because at least then he'd get messages late, while previously he would sometimes never get them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. Re:News to me by DarrenBaker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh. You're THAT guy.

  18. Re:So much raw data by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stop it. Just stop it. Not only are you a coward by posting anonymously, but the nine mile debris field has been debunked REPEATEDLY, including by police officers on the scene.

    The nine mile debris field consisted of bits of paper which may or may not have been from the flight when it impacted in the field.

    Further, that nine mile figure is bogus. People used MapQuest to find the distance between the crash site and the supposed debris field. Sure, nine miles if you drive by road, but roughly 2.5 miles in a straight line.

    The debris field WAS NOT composed of engine parts, seats, body parts or anything else heavier than a piece of paper.

    Your friend is also an idiot as there are nearly a dozen eyewitnesses to the plane coming down, some of which watched the plane, intact, nose dive into the ground. Had the plane been shot down, it would have displayed some semblance of damage including smoke and/or fire trailing from it. Not one eyewitness described seeing anything of the sort.

    End of story, full stop.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  19. I don't think it's complete by Tweezer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I searched a whole bunch of these for the word "fuck" and couldn't find a single instance. I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why don't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC.