Slashdot Mirror


Italian Prosecutors Seek Prison Sentences For Google Execs

angry tapir writes "Milan prosecutors have sought prison sentences ranging from six months to one year for four Google executives accused of violating Italy's privacy laws over the posting of a video showing the bullying of a handicapped teenage boy. The prosecutor's request was backed up by a request by lawyers representing the Milan city council for €300,000 (US$452,000) in moral and material damages. The case concerns the posting on Google Video of a three-minute mobile-phone video showing a handicapped boy being tormented by his classmates in a Turin school."

127 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. I'm sure glad by mandark1967 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:I'm sure glad by smitty777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, what about the person that uploaded the video? They would seem to be the main culprit to me, not Google.

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
    2. Re:I'm sure glad by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not the only time in Italy - media empire of Berlusconi pointing fingers at external factors, the deal with crosses being obviously the fault of Strasburg and not a case of not following your own damn laws, season immigrants from new EU memberstates being put effectively into slavery because of their own fault of not being able to prevent it...it's always easier to look for blame abroad.

      And when you do you actually get to win the popularity contest...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:I'm sure glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.

      They are going after the company that embarrassed the city publicly. BTW, everybody understands the problem here except for a few Americans.

    4. Re:I'm sure glad by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In recent news, leaders of the BBC were jailed for showing footage of a warzone during a news report. Obviously, they must be entirely responsible for this war.

      Also, it has just been discovered that if you hide a problem, it goes away.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:I'm sure glad by Shin-LaC · · Score: 4, Informative

      As stated in comments on the previous Slashdot post on the case, the perpetrators were already prosecuted in 2006.

    6. Re:I'm sure glad by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Sounds an awful lot like how the music industry handles lawsuits.

    7. Re:I'm sure glad by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Those guys had a trial in 2007 but I don't remember the outcome. A non profit organization filed a suit against Google for allowing the video on youtube. They are two different issues and two different trials.

    8. Re:I'm sure glad by grumpyman · · Score: 4, Funny

      To further that argument, I think the main culprit is Al Gore, who invented the Internet. No?

    9. Re:I'm sure glad by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well ime sure that Berlusconi would like to have most of comedians and cartoonists extridtite dto Italy for making fun of him then

    10. Re:I'm sure glad by vegiVamp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, America spawned him, and Columbus discovered America. There's your culprit. He's responsible for Bush, too, btw.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    11. Re:I'm sure glad by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Lest we forget Adam and Eve so soon?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  2. I hope that the primary focus of the prosecution by Interoperable · · Score: 4, Insightful

    was to punish the bullies (appropriately scaled to the age of the guilty parties)! The case against Google seems absurd in any case. It hinges on the fact that Google didn't remove the video after it was requested to. The reason was that the request was sent to the wrong address. Google may seem to be omniscient but if they didn't get the notice there is no rational case against them. In any case I doubt they're answerable to Italian law unless the prosecutors could prove to an American court that extradition is warranted.

    --
    So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
  3. Morons by multisync · · Score: 4, Informative

    Punish the kids who were doing the harassing. Google removed the video within a day, once someone actually bothered to contact them about it, and Google cooperated with Italian police:

    The prosecutors had also failed to acknowledge Google's cooperation with the Italian police, Pisapia said. The bullying of the handicapped boy, which had been going on for two years, came to an end after Google identified the person responsible for posting the video and enabled the police to identify the boy's tormentors, he said.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
    1. Re:Morons by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once again, no good deed goes unpunished.

  4. Peter Fleischer's blog on this... by bahbar · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Peter Fleischer's blog on this... by initialE · · Score: 1

      His lawyers are smart people. Since this case is so obviously farcial, it would be really dangerous to be around town as there is no guarantee that anything resembling justice will be carried out. If you ask me, some other agenda is being carried out here. Someone's being blackmailed, somebody needs leverage. Something.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    2. Re:Peter Fleischer's blog on this... by initialE · · Score: 1

      Just to add a second thought:

      Italy has a legal concept which is unknown in Anglo-Saxon countries: namely, that an employee of a company can be held personally criminally liable for the actions or non-actions of the corporation he works for.

      This is a variant of a dream that many slashdotters have had - to hold executives responsible to the actions of the companies they represent. How bitter it is when an ideal is perverted thus.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  5. A lesson to Google by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope this serves as a lesson to companies who seem to want the best of all worlds. I'm kind of glad that google is getting hit with this because it brings to light the problem with trying to cater to the demands of local governments. When Google began working with governments in foreign jurisdictions it opened the door to this type of activity.

    Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.

    Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws. That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:A lesson to Google by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every international company has to obey laws for that country, or not do business in that country. When the Wolfenstein games were released in Germany, they had to remove all Nazi signs because that is German law.

      Google was told they had to filter search results, or they would be blocked in China. They filter results, but they are the only search engine in China which says right on the search page that the results have been filtered. At least they made a small effort to stand up for free speech while technically complying with China's laws.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:A lesson to Google by markus_baertschi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan. They try to be a good citizen everywhere. Unfortunately this is not easy, in Chine a good citizen does not talk about certain things, in the US you are not supposed to hide the same things. Sou you can not be a good citizen in both places at the same time. Google could choose not to be in China, but this would not help matters (it would be blocked by the great firewall).

    3. Re:A lesson to Google by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every international company has to obey laws for that country, or not do business in that country. When the Wolfenstein games were released in Germany, they had to remove all Nazi signs because that is German law.

      If I set up a server in not-Germany, I wouldn't have to do a damned thing to alter the content that my website is providing with respect to German law. Germany would be free to block my site, but I am not responsible for the laws of Germany as long as I'm not going into Germany, or attempting to send products to Germans. I follow the laws of my host country.

      If what Google is doing in China is good enough for you, that's fine. But I consider it to be a tremendous and horrid act to behave in accordance with laws which violate someone's human rights. I won't suggest that you must believe the same as I do, but Google's warning on their website is a token gesture and is meaningless without sufficient action to back up it's statements.

      The point remains that by setting up shop in a country, and attempting to follow the 'laws' of every country, Google has placed itself in the position where countries (like Italy) attempt to treat them like they have an actual business in that country.

      The internet does not have an immediate analogue in the real world, and attempting to treat services provided on the internet as a local service simply because you can 'see' it from inside your country is flawed logic. I suppose the closest analogy to this example would be someone in Italy attempting to apply an Italian law against lewd behavior against an Austrian couple because they were visible from the Italian side of the border.

      Just because you can 'see' it on the internet doesn't mean that the act occurred within your country's jurisdiction.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:A lesson to Google by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I do believe you are correct. In this situation Google is not in a good position.

      I admit I'm a bit of a hardliner when it comes to freedom. I will do my best to NOT engage in commerce with an entity that will use that money to further their cause of limiting freedom. It does mean that some of my goods cost more (hardly anywhere close to the 2x that many apologists claim), but it is working out well for me so far.

      Convincing our politicians to do something about it so that one US company attempting to 'be good' isn't bypassed by another US company who doesn't care is a much more difficult and complicated issue.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    5. Re:A lesson to Google by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      The point remains that by setting up shop in a country, and attempting to follow the 'laws' of every country, Google has placed itself in the position where countries (like Italy) attempt to treat them like they have an actual business in that country.

      Er, "setting up shop" is doing business. If you set up shop in Italy, then that shop has to follow Italy's laws.

      The internet does not have an immediate analogue in the real world, and attempting to treat services provided on the internet as a local service simply because you can 'see' it from inside your country is flawed logic. I suppose the closest analogy to this example would be someone in Italy attempting to apply an Italian law against lewd behavior against an Austrian couple because they were visible from the Italian side of the border.

      Just because you can 'see' it on the internet doesn't mean that the act occurred within your country's jurisdiction.

      In this case, the act did occur within that country's jurisdiction, so what's your point? I am sure that Italy's courts are not trying to prosecute Google Italy employees for infractions of non-Italian laws.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:A lesson to Google by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you can 'see' it on the internet doesn't mean that the act occurred within your country's jurisdiction.

      Apart from the fact that Google.it is registered in Italy, and the video is accessible from google.it

      I hope this serves as a lesson to companies who seem to want the best of all worlds. I'm kind of glad that google is getting hit with this because it brings to light the problem with trying to cater to the demands of local governments. When Google began working with governments in foreign jurisdictions it opened the door to this type of activity.

      Xenophobic much? If Google wants to customise their service depending on which country they're serving, it's their own [censored] business. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to use anything Google related. It's not like the US is perfect either.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:A lesson to Google by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      The point remains that by setting up shop in a country, and attempting to follow the 'laws' of every country, Google has placed itself in the position where countries (like Italy) attempt to treat them like they have an actual business in that country.

      Erm... they DO have and actual business in those countries: they sell ads. And being able to keep selling ads is what makes Google obey local laws.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    8. Re:A lesson to Google by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      If google had told china to go screw itself, they would have had a defense.

      But they didn't.

      So they lost their effective "common carrier" status and now must comply with the laws of every country on earth.

      The only way around this would be to *not serve* to a country unless it signs up to allow google. The signup would have a complete pass on conforming to laws or a specific list of laws the country really really cared about. Google could then decide if the cost of compliance was worth serving the country.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:A lesson to Google by Omestes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But I consider it to be a tremendous and horrid act to behave in accordance with laws which violate someone's human rights.

      I personally dislike China's ubiquitous censorship, and Google supporting it. But I don't think that internet searches have anything to do with human rights. What right is being infringed upon? Sure, it is still tyranny, but I have grave doubts that there is any right to uncensored internet searches (actually I have grave doubts that there are any innate human rights at all!).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    10. Re:A lesson to Google by westlake · · Score: 1

      Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.

      You are also bound by the laws of the country in which you do business.

      The Italian client expects to see an Italian presence in sales and development when he speaks to Google or he will take his money elsewhere.

    11. Re:A lesson to Google by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Hey, AC, do you actually know what fascism is?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    12. Re:A lesson to Google by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Never said that. I do not condone either Google or China. I was just questioning whether the act violated human rights. If there are innate human rights then everything that violates them is bad, and not everything that doesn't violate them is good. I could draw a Venn Diagram for ya.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    13. Re:A lesson to Google by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.

      Google is not a US company, it is an international company with physical assets - datacenters, mostly - all around the world.

      Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws. That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.

      If you have assets or business where a particular country can get to them, you either avoid pissing that country or risk losing them.

      It's not the flag you're flying that matters, but the flags of the warships within cannon range.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    14. Re:A lesson to Google by The_Quinn · · Score: 1

      Every international company has to obey laws for that country, or not do business in that country.

      The only thing you have to do is die.

      Rosa Parks broke the law to give up her seat on the bus, and that's a good thing.

      There is a distinction between the legal and the moral, especially when the former is not based on the latter.

      Foreign governments don't have a right to impose their coercive whims on their citizens, and we don't have to, a priori, respect the legitimacy of such oppressive regimes.

    15. Re:A lesson to Google by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan. They try to be a good citizen everywhere.

      Exactly! And in Soviet Russia "being a good citizen" means turning in dissidents. In North Korea it means never ever saying anything bad about the Government. In eastern Congo it means tolerating rape and violence against women. In Nazi Germany.... Yup, it's all just a days work in "don't be evil".

      This kind of moral relativism run amok is not "don't be evil". I'm not willing to start saying Google has lost any moral fiber, but the extreme you're proposing is simply wrong. I think you've really missed the central issue here though. Google is a red herring in this whole story.

      I don't think the video really has much of anything to do with Google being right or wrong. Google is merely reflecting the moral character of the society, and some people don't seem to like looking in the mirror. This kind of thing isn't going away, and it certainly isn't going to be stopped by turning to a centralized source like Google to attempt to control an inherently de-centralized Internet.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:A lesson to Google by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      In the case of server hacking - if the server was on US soil then the server is governed by US law. Most likely the hacking was illegal under local law as well, so extradition won't be a problem. If it isn't against the law, the local government will be quickly under pressure to stop it just the same. Hacking into military servers is also a bit of an unusual case, since armies by their very nature are designed to disregard national sovereignty.

      If somebody genuinely commits libel I'm fine with charging them under local jurisdictions, but of course enforcement might be a problem. Now, some countries have really crazy definitions of libel and that I'm opposed to regardless of how it is applied. If a person is convicted in some country where the definition is insane, then at least they're unlikely to be extradited by their local government.

      The internet creates all kinds of national sovereignty problems by its very nature. Not much can really be done to fix that unless everybody wants to agree on one set of standards.

    17. Re:A lesson to Google by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Saying another nation isn't perfect contributes absolutely nothing to the discussion at hand. This is a common, juvenile attempt to misdirect attention.

    18. Re:A lesson to Google by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Xenophobic much? If Google wants to customise their service depending on which country they're serving, it's their own [censored] business. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to use anything Google related. It's not like the US is perfect either.

      Xenophobic? Industrialcomplex seemed to be suggesting that google simply not cater to the -local government's- demands when those demands violate human rights. You're basically equating advocacy of human rights with xenophobia, which is absurd. Xenophobia would be saying "Google should prevent users in China from using their services at all."

      Cultural imperialism might make a little more sense, but the things I assume he was talking about, helping the chinese government with their censoring activities, aren't really cultural, and anyway if part of your culture is violating human rights, I say fuck your culture. If, say, Saudi arabia were to ask google to help them keep their women off the internet, I would hope that google would at least say "Yeah... no." if not launch a special section specifically for saudi women to find what their government didn't want them seeing.

      Not expecting that from a company that doesn't exist to further human rights, but I would be dissapointed if Google went along with that.

    19. Re:A lesson to Google by gdshaw · · Score: 1

      I think you may be confusing good citizens with obedient citizens.

    20. Re:A lesson to Google by somersault · · Score: 1

      The whole China situation isn't great, but it's better for google to be there and complying with the laws, than for them not to be there at all. Things will change over time. There must be millions of businesses worldwide that interact with China. Google is one of the ones that is more likely to encourage a positive change in their political spectrum.

      I get that there are cultures in the world that could do with a bit of enlightenment, but saying "fuck you" and ignoring them is not going to help. And on top of that, there are a few countries in the world that I think would be even better than the US for hosting google in an unmolested fashion, Sweden is probably a good one.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:A lesson to Google by somersault · · Score: 1

      It seemed pretty relevant to me, especially considering it was part of the base of this guy's argument. Yes it would be simpler to keep everything in one country, but in that case I don't think the US is place that would grant the most freedom from oppression or political influence. I'm quite serious about that, though I'm aware it's kind of flame bait around here.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    22. Re:A lesson to Google by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I see your points, and think I definitely think they're worth discussion. My only real grip is the tack of deviating from the topic at hand to make a statement about an unrelated nation's issues.

    23. Re:A lesson to Google by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Google said they felt it was better to create in-roads and tell people they their government was hiding information from them, than rather be blocked and not reach the Chinese populace at all.

      It is pretty hard to argue with that logic.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    24. Re:A lesson to Google by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Everyone cites the Patriot Act as this great evil, yet the Senators who voted for it (and continue to vote to extend it) say it isn't evil because every provision in it requires a judge to sign off on it, creating a system of checks and balances.

      I've read stories in the news of bad judges abusing the system, but what I've yet to read is why specifically the law itself is so evil.

      Since you're so convinced of its evil nature, perhaps you can illuminate us.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    25. Re:A lesson to Google by somersault · · Score: 1

      Free speech is a joke when you can't debate history. Now, that's hypocritical.

      I have no idea what you're referring to. Sounds like something that maybe Germany would do, but there's a whole lot more to Europe than Germany. It's pretty silly to lump the whole of Europe together when you're referring to matters of culture, law and politics.. the European Union is nowhere near as much of a monoculture as the Unites States are. That's not meant to be an insult, just an observation, and a fairly obvious one to anyone who actually knows anything about Europe.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    26. Re:A lesson to Google by somersault · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was evil, but it certainly is a step towards being a "Police state". The AC I was replying to was IMO being rather hypocritical.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    27. Re:A lesson to Google by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Not a single terrorist attack against US civilians on US soil since September 11, 2001

      Well why would they bother when they have plenty of US targets deployed in their own backyard now?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:A lesson to Google by bluewolfcub · · Score: 1

      I have been to Europe, Canada, and Mexico. I assure you, the US is by far the freest country of all the ones I have seen.

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but Europe isn't a country.

  6. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah. If only the Latin name wasn't Augusta Taurinorum, that has nothing to do with cliffs and all with the emperor's name and the name of the local people.

  7. Strike 2 by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Strike 1

    That's strike 2, Google. If you put one more foot wrong I'm changing my homepage over to Bing.

    1. Re:Strike 2 by rutter · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope you are kidding.

    2. Re:Strike 2 by Rhaban · · Score: 1

      Altavista is and has always been far superior to yahoo.

    3. Re:Strike 2 by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      No, I'm sure he's serious. His problem is obviously with Google manipulating search results. If I'm wrong, then yes the gp is a moron.

    4. Re:Strike 2 by Monkier · · Score: 1

      Two more strikes and Google gets their internet connection cut? Oh, no!

  8. Lesson for Google by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If anyone posts video of someone performing some illegal activity, delete it ASAP, don't tell anyone and sweep everything under the rug. The video was never there, you never saw anything and I'm sorry, Officer that I can't help you, am I free to go now?

    At least that's what the court is trying to teach them.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Lesson for Google by markus_baertschi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If their president is almost openly like that, drafting laws almost explicitly designed to stop his prosecution, why should other behave better ?

    2. Re:Lesson for Google by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... “If Hitler openly wants to kill jews, why should other(sic) behave better?” ...maybe because they would want to be better than Berlusconi?

      Just saying...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  9. Re:Ironic by Oscaro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know where you found this info, and I never heard anything about it (and I actually have born and live in Torino). Also there are no "cliffs" around Torino, and Torino has nevere been a citystate in ancient times: in fact it was born as a Roman military camp.

  10. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Extradition? These are Google employees based in Italy.

  11. e-commerce directive say they go free by lordholm · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since Italy is in the EU, they are bound by the directive of e-commerse, especially articles 14 (hosting) and 15 (no obligation to monitor) are important:

    Article 14 Hosting
    1. Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service, on condition that: (a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent; or (b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information.
    2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider.
    3. This Article shall not affect the possibility for a court or administrative authority, in accordance with Member States' legal systems, of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the possibility for Member States of establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information.

    Article 15 No general obligation to monitor
    1. Member States shall not impose a general obligation on providers, when providing the services covered by Articles 12, 13 and 14, to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.
    2. Member States may establish obligations for information society service providers promptly to inform the competent public authorities of alleged illegal activities undertaken or information provided by recipients of their service or obligations to communicate to the competent authorities, at their request, information enabling the identification of recipients of their service with whom they have storage agreements.

    There is no discussion about it, they cannot be found guilty under EU legislation, and if Italy still sentences them, the Italian government can be dragged into the European court of justice, where they will most likely be found to be in violation of the e-commerce directive.

    --
    "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    1. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by jaggeh · · Score: 1

      if i had any mod points left this last post would have got them.

      --
      I would give everything i own for a little bit more.
    2. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by pauxu · · Score: 1

      Article 14 refers to Hosting and aims to protect ISP's, which is not the case: YouTube is not an ISP.But I agree that in this case Google cannot be found guilty.

    3. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by Neil+Strickland · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is worth noting, however, that directives like this are not self-implementing (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_(European_Union)). The Italian government is required by EU treaties to pass laws implementing the directive, but in an Italian court you cannot appeal directly to the directive itself. So the key question here is the wording of the relevant Italian law.

    4. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The Italian government is required by EU treaties to pass laws implementing the directive, but in an Italian court you cannot appeal directly to the directive itself.

      I may be misunderstanding this, but if Google was to be found guilty under the Italian laws as they stand, but those laws are not compliant with the EU treaty in question, couldn't Google then proceed to sue Italy in European court?

    5. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by Neil+Strickland · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I think you are right. Apparently Frankovich v Italy was a landmark case of this type, where the European Court required the Italian government to pay compensation to workers in a situation where they would automatically have been compensated if an EU directive had been properly implemented in Italian law.

    6. Re:e-commerce directive say they go free by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Youtube is most certainly an ISP. An ISP is any company that hosts content without having any sort of publishing arm or creating content themselves.

  12. Re:Ironic by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Except sometimes a parent wouldn't have the heart to do this and would raise the deformed child to be a powerful warrior, promising that he will one day be able to be a spartan.

    Sadly this was not to be as his deformities would make him unsuitable to join their ranks. In a fit of self loathing he would then lead the Spartan's enemies down a hidden route so the Spartans would be flanked and killed.

    At least that is what I was led to believe by a highly accurate documentary I watched.

  13. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    you're way off, man
    the name Torino comes from the ancient roman name Augusta Taurinorum and the latin root for Taurinorum means nothing like "cliff" or "crag" but is tied to the population (Taurini) that lived there before Julius Caesar conquered their city.
    Also "taurus" is the latin word for "bull".
    And, as far as i know, there were no mass infanticide in that city either.

    THIS IS TUUUUUUUUUUURIN!!! (not Sparta :))

  14. Re:Ironic by sagematt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Similar to Greek Sparta

    Ironic? This... is... TORINOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. Re:Ironic by error_frey · · Score: 1

    where did you get this info? Never heard of Torino as a city-state (or) with sparta-like traditions.

    by the way, "Torino" is a current italian name, not a latin one.

  16. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    hush you! culture in not appreciated in america and history may well be adapted to meet the requirements of a well told story.

    just read the homo sapiens etymology at http://www.eco-pros.com/biodiversity.htm (around the end):
    <Scientific name: Homo sapiens translates from Latin as Homo (self, man or human being), sapiens (wise, knowing). The Latin "homo" is related to the word "humus" earth, and could be viewed as a kind of "earthling.">

    at least wikipedia got it right:
    In the first century BC (probably 28 BC), the Romans created a military camp (Castra Taurinorum), later dedicated to Augustus (Augusta Taurinorum). The typical Roman street grid can still be seen in the modern city. Turin reached about 5,000 inhabitants at the time, all living inside the high walls.

    And Taurinorum comes from "Taurasia", a somewhat legendary barbaric village thought to be burned down by Hannibale coming to Italy, as the "Tauri" people, for which it was the capital, refused to surrender to him. It was later reconstructed as Castra Taurinorum.

    History is hard, so please don't try it at home, kids.

  17. Take your place in line by starfishsystems · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google executives will have to take their place in line.

    I plan to launch a similar action against these Italian politicians. After all, it was their country in which the crime took place. They stood by and permitted it to happen, didn't they?

    To make matters worse, they haven't even responded to my letter demanding an apology. That's right. I sent it to Gino's Italian Deli in Montreal. It says "Italian Politicians" right on the envelope, so I know that it was addressed properly. If there was any doubt, it could have been forwarded to the Italian postal service.

    There is no excuse. These people are criminals.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    1. Re:Take your place in line by KraftDinner · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I really wish that people actually did things like this.

  18. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Latin word Torino (the proper spelling of 'Turin') means "small crag" or "small cliff". Similar to Greek Sparta, this citystate was notorious for performing infanticide of small, weak, and handicapped children. These kids would be thrown off the cliffs to their deaths for no other crime than being genetically inferior.

    Yeah. If only the Latin name wasn't Augusta Taurinorum, that has nothing to do with cliffs and all with the emperor's name and the name of the local people.

    This all sounds like a bunch of bull to me.

  19. What is the deal here? by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless these execs posted the videos personally, why are they trying to hold Google responsible? What kind of mob law does Italy follow? What was done to the boy was reprehensible, and by all means, punish the people who did this to him. I seriously doubt these execs even knew this video existed until someone told them they had been charged. Allowing public anger to dictate who can be charged as a criminal when they have done nothing wrong is just stupid not to put too fine a point on it.

    1. Re:What is the deal here? by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Informative

      As I recall, Google pulled the video within an hour of being notified it was even posted, and identified for police the IP address of the poster, allowing them to catch the actual bullies. The prosecutor is hoping to springboard into real politics by making a name for himself as the man who takes on big evil corporations, and the fact that they did everything right, and broke now laws, and cooperated with police extremely promptly, none of that matters.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:What is the deal here? by turtleshadow · · Score: 1

      Many non US governments hold top executives as the responsible party for their corporation. Thus when a lawsuit comes there s not just a bunch of lawyers representing a corporate name but someone is actually hauled in front of the judge. Many Western Executives are unable to travel to certain countries because they have been indicted, tried (sometimes in absentia) and personally found guilty of allowing graft, corruption, carelessness, criminal activities of others (often the locals) in their employment in the Global company. I believe Union Carbide in 84 and IBM Korea in 04 tried to get such testimony.

      As an executive with the duty of oversight they were supposed to ensure such acts never happened in the lower ranks.
      Probably the Italians think that Google has a local presence that should have caught the video and reported it under local laws.
      This is chilling if some foreign government lawyer ever wants to extradite me because I did or didn't click on the inappropriate content button.

      But I kind of have to meep Meep at .IT as they as a nation can not even successfully oust Silvio Berlusconi after so much that has happened.
      The thought that Lodo Alphoso act for executive immunity could be worked, seems like the guy has a Caesar/Napoleon Complex

    3. Re:What is the deal here? by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      Quick, somebody call Phoenix Wright!

    4. Re:What is the deal here? by initialE · · Score: 1

      "Does not play well with others." That's the big sign this prosecutor is holding up. The next time he needs a major corporation to assist in finding and identifying a criminal... well, it's going to get interesting.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  20. Media empire owned by a dictator by thijsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no other word for the rule of Berlusconi than a smoothly veiled dictatorship...
    An example of the abuse of his media empire: http://features.csmonitor.com/globalnews/2009/11/10/italy-the-latest-fashion-%E2%80%93-blue-socks-against-berlusconi/
    It sounds stupid, and it really is... but this is the only country in Europe where politicians can get away with smear campaigns, and only because this politician owns or influences most media in the country.

    Something a little more scary is the immunity Berlusconi gave himself to prevent any convictions of his crimes... but that was ruled unconstitutional: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8295716.stm

    1. Re:Media empire owned by a dictator by hjrnunes · · Score: 1

      yeah well, more scary than all that (since the Italians actually voted for the man - and in democracy you get what you deserve) is the environmental catastrophe in and around Napoli and all Campania region. Probably affecting the whole south. Garbage. Everywhere, dangerous, unprocessed, toxic garbage. I saw it on vbs.tv's Toxic Napoli and it blew me away.

      Sometimes you get the feeling that it's Manila or someplace like that... but no. It's Italia right in the middle of the EU...

  21. Re:Ironic by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

    I hope you'll never watch Armageddon... ;)

  22. Google should black list them by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should just blacklist blocks of IPs used by Italian law enforcement and legislature for a few weeks from all of Google's services. The Italian government might be able to arrest them if they visit Italy, but Google can deal with them if they go on the Internet.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Google should black list them by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Cut off the whole country. They don't want Google in their country.. it can be arranged.

    2. Re:Google should black list them by KraftDinner · · Score: 1

      They will probably try to charge them for discrimination by not allowing them service. They could also use a new slogan I made up for them. "Italy. There's a law for that".

  23. Re:Slashdot hasn't suspend parent's account yet?! by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want /. to take action against these posts, you'll have to join the church of Scientology first. Then they'll listen. :)

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  24. Re:Non-news by Chatterton · · Score: 1

    Until the next sentence of the same type for a similar case. Now that all the bullyed italian who the video is posted on internet know that they can win €300.000 at the court lottery, why will they do no do so?

  25. Interesting... by redbeardcanada · · Score: 1

    I clicked on your Strike 1 link, read that article then clicked on the link that showed the Google Image search results to see the actual image.

    The doctored image of Michelle Obama rightfully generated a lot of negative reaction; however about 8 pictures in to the search results was one showing the similarities between George Bush and a monkey. There seems to be no outrage to this one...

    Maybe the difference is an attack specific to an individual vs. an attack that is seen to be against a group of people?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      How about the pictures of Rice dressed as an african native? Somebody didn't consider that racially offensive? Or is that accusation reserved for people who make fun of Democrats? :)

      Last time I checked those images were still hosted by Google and the NAACP hasn't been pitching a fit.

  26. Reputation by mseeger · · Score: 1

    The only reason for prosecuting the Google Execs is: It gives more kudos (not within the /. community and only if they win) and press coverage for the prosecutors. So they take the gamble, since most judges are so incompetent about everything concerning the internet.

  27. Re:Non-news by kheldan · · Score: 1

    A word: "Grandstanding".

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  28. Re:Ironic by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    They killed babies for being genetically inferior?

    Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  29. Yep, again google's fault by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Like the image of Obama's wife as a money on images.google.com, and everyone seeing an image of a money when they type in her name....it was all their fault for creating such a great search engine that someone could post an image of a money to the web and call it what ever name.

    Same thing here , the video is clearly google's fault for letting the video happen, I mean they should have had a multi billion software that is in place and is smart enough to watch the video, and know what is happening and be able to deny it from being posted once someone posts it on youtube or whatever. Come on, where has common sense gone.....I guess these *ssholes really know nothing about computers!

    1. Re:Yep, again google's fault by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Like the image of Obama's wife as a money

      Money shot, surely?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Yep, again google's fault by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      That was a typo, was supposed to read the monkey.

      : P

  30. Re:Ironic by peppepz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also Ironic, that they haven't actually done anything about the incident, to make sure the kid is okay;

    Yes, they did: the bullies have been suspended from school and assigned to community service.
    On the penal side, they're accused of private violence, insult, defamation, assault and menaces.

    It is interesting to note that the kid's family withdrew the suit against Google, and the trial is now going on only because other parties enlisted themselves as "civil parties" (that is, victims of a crime who are seeking for a refund - sorry, I don't know the exact english term for that).

  31. I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications. A few months ago they even made a law proposal for taking restrictive measures (no anonimity), officially to protect children, but the freely downloadable document metadata of the law proposal contained the address of the president of the Italian union of audiovisual publishers. So much for protecting children! That would have been laughable if it wasn't real, sadly it is.
    Feel free to search for the Carlucci Law proposal, from the name of Gabriella Carlucci, another -just guess- ex showgirl turned into a politician by that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi.

    1. Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Actually, this story is REALLY about the italians who keep electing these corrupt politicians over and over. Berlusconi makes Bush look competent and a nice guy and italians just can't seem to get enough of him.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by orzetto · · Score: 1
      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    3. Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by orzetto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yet, those very corrupt politicians are pushing the "fast trial" reform, which will cancel this trial, since the facts date back to 2006.

      Under the proposed (and likely going to be approved, unless they figure out something worse) fast-trial law, any trial lasting more than 2 years (counting from end of investigations) in any of the three degrees of appeal of the Italian justice system will be considered a mistrial. The average duration of a trial is currently 7 and a half years, you do the math.

      The reason is to avoid Berlusconi from being found guilty in an open-and-shut witness-corruption case he has been dragging for months.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    4. Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi

      I find that offensive to bastards.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies. by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

      An anonymous coward wrote:

      This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications.

      You may be Italian, but you don't seem to know a lot about our system.

      Prosecutors are completely independent of the government. This case has nothing to do with politicians, and everything to do with the fact that there was a privacy infringement and Google was - willingly or otherwise - instrumental in perpetrating it. Worse, they were turning a profit while doing it.

      This means that - at the very least - there must be a trial.

      --
      Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
  32. Can you say "money grab" by m509272 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plain and simple money grab attempt. Shame on these "officials". How about more concern about the victim?

  33. The law can multi-task by westlake · · Score: 1

    that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.

    What makes you think that the prosecutors aren't going after everyone involved?

    I will admit that what worries me more is that to far too many Slashdot posters the "really guilty party" can't be the geek, no matter what the charge.

    1. Re:The law can multi-task by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      I will admit that what worries me more is that to far too many Slashdot posters the "really guilty party" can't be the geek, no matter what the charge.

      How about we just look at this case, where google had nothing to do with the assault or the video, other than providing a venue where people could post any video? Google removed the video as soon as they received a complaint. I'd still like to know how Google violated a law here.

      From the article:

      The delay in removing the offensive video was the result of a failure to apply to the right authority, Pisapia said. When the complaint reached Google Inc., which controlled Google Video, the video was removed within hours, he said. "The first complaint went to the wrong address, so the people who had the power to remove it were unaware of the problem." Italian law does not lay any responsibility on hosting providers to monitor the content they upload onto Internet, Pisapia said. "Their only responsibility, established under a 2003 law, is to remove content when ordered to do so by the judicial authorities."

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  34. What do we learn? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    If you beat someone up, and brag about it by recording it to a video, you get away.
    But don’t dare to tell anyone about it, or you go to jail!

    It’s like the censorship in Germany: They are actively protecting and supporting what they say they want to prevent.
    With the motto “If we close our eyes to rape, it ceases to exist!”.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  35. Re:Ironic by Terrasque · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the movie is not complete fiction. Greatly exaggerated, but not complete fiction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Thermopylae is pretty interesting reading.

    --
    It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
  36. Twice Ironic by SharpFang · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Isn't it sad that mods miss irony in a post even if its title states it?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  37. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, with Germany talking about making Google Analytics illegal and now this crap, I'm rapidly losing my patience with those who keep running on about how Europe is such a free place.

  38. Re:Ironic by orzetto · · Score: 1

    .That is completely false. Torino comes from the celtic word Tau, which means mountain (meaning the Alps, definitely not small). It was later adapted by the Latins into Augusta Taurinorum. Your story is completely false, especially since Turin never had a particular civilisation to boast of in ancient times.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  39. Way to go Italy... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Way to go Italy, for blaming your own society's shortcomings on a foreign company. That'll sure solve the problem of bullying handicapped people.
    I guess McDonalds is to blame for the maffia?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  40. Re:Ironic by kd4zqe · · Score: 1

    The Latin word Torino (the proper spelling of 'Turin') means "small crag" or "small cliff". Similar to Greek Sparta, this citystate was notorious for performing infanticide of small, weak, and handicapped children. These kids would be thrown off the cliffs to their deaths for no other crime than being genetically inferior.

    Yeah. If only the Latin name wasn't Augusta Taurinorum, that has nothing to do with cliffs and all with the emperor's name and the name of the local people.

    This all sounds like a bunch of bull to me.

    That's Toro, not Torino.

    --
    You're not paranoid if they really ARE out to get you...
  41. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by palegray.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Troll? Fine, somebody please explain to me how prosecuting Google employees for providing a service that anybody can use to upload videos, and complying with police requests for assistance after the authorities bothered to use the correct contact channels is anything but completely insane.

    The kids involved are the guilty parties; maybe someone should go arrest their parents for failing to raise them properly. Oh, the parents aren't responsible for watching their kids 24 hours a day? Well, it isn't Google's responsibility to take their place.

  42. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by Ifni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you missed the memo - Europe is the new Apple and thus is above all recrimination (except for when they try to pass 3 strike laws and justify all of Britain's CCTV cameras). And Americuns is dumbestest and must submit to any and all insults about their intelligence and lack of culture, even if the post itself proves insightful and the poster has demonstrated time and again that (s)he does not fit the mold of the uneducated American.

    In other words, America is universally reviled and you are expected to just shut up and accept the hatred, but don't stop writing those support checks to the rest of the world.

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  43. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by somersault · · Score: 1

    Yes, the original post was a bit light on arguments ;)

    Europe isn't really very close to being a single entity at the moment compared to the US. The laws and cultures in each country vary a lot. Even in the British Isles and little islands around about we have separate law in Scotland, England, Wales, Ireland, the Isle of Man, probably different ones in Jersey etc.. I'm not an expert on it all. So just because Italy and Germany (2 of the countries that are a bit more likely to be right wing historically) do a couple of crazy things doesn't say much about Europe as a whole.

    I hope that google analytics thing is shot down, and no harm was caused by the morons that were trying to blame Google in italy. The are idiots in every country, and unfortunately the idiots are the ones most likely to get on the news. Again, that's not an attempt at misdirection, juts a statement of fact to try to inject a bit of perspective.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  44. Just leave Italy by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    They should close up their office and their next homepage image should be of a stereotypical Italian mobster chucking toxic waste into the sea for their government along with some bodies.

  45. Re:Oh sure.... by Ifni · · Score: 1

    Hmm, that'd actually SAVE on taxes for most of them...

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  46. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Politically, Europe is not a single entity. Some European countries (e.g. UK, Italy, Greece) are more corrupt than other countries (e.g. Ireland, Finland, Estonia).

    Of course, all countries have bad laws ("three strikes" etc). Some just happen to have more than others, both within and outside EU.

    The reason why U.S. gets more attention than others is because it's the only country which persistently applies the label "Land of the Free", and similar ones, in its political propaganda, with the implication that it's ultimately more free than other countries. Hence why its anti-freedom policies are more heavily scrutinized.

    I mean, when U.S. fucks that up, you can always remember about the "freedom" in "freedom, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". When e.g. Canada fucks up, you can at best remember "peace, order, and good government", and notice the conspicuous absence of the word "free" in there.

    In other words, it's all about false advertising. ~

  47. Congratulations! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    I want to sincerely congratulate the nation of Italy. It's great to see that you're continuing that time-honoured tradition of evil governments stomping on the face of free speech. Mussolini would be proud.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  48. Re:Ironic by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    They killed babies for being genetically inferior?

    Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!

    Etymology: Latin genus (“‘birth, origin, a race, sort, kind’”) root gen in Latin gignere, Old Latin gegnere (“‘to beget, produce’”)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  49. Re:The case is known as... by edivad · · Score: 1

    "Retarded Italian Prosecutors v Google airing retarded Italians"

    That much, said by someone that can't even spell ...

  50. Re:The case is known as... by gavron · · Score: 1
    Which word did your retarded self feel was not spelled correctly?

    Go see a dictionary.

    Oh. Wait. If you're retarded it all makes sense. Sorry, I didn't make it readable for retards.

    E

  51. Re:The case is known as... by edivad · · Score: 1

    Unless you meant "airing" as "put on air", which I doubt because it makes not sense in such context, that's spelled "hiring" you short bus rider.

  52. Re:Ironic by shentino · · Score: 1

    I think it went for TAURinorum, as in Taurus.

  53. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by palegray.net · · Score: 1

    We don't want them, we didn't ask for them.

    Well, don't we sound bitter? You may not have asked for anything, but your elected officials sure did.

  54. Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I think you missed the memo - Europe is the new Apple

    Steady on, old chap, we're not all gay here.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  55. Re:tpb by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Could this be similar to the pirate bay case?

    The space bats are flying daintily tonight, so yes.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  56. Re:It's a good thing by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though, do they expect those four Google executives to sit and watch every video posted on YouTube and Google Video? No human being can possibly consume that much pr0n.

    There's pr0n on YouTube?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it