Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Charged With Slavery, Human Trafficking

eldavojohn writes "A formal complaint was filed in California (caged PDF) last week by John Lindstein naming David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology International as defendants. Lindstein claims that for sixteen years (from age 8) he was forced to work as a slave at Gold Base, a secret CoS site run by Golden Era Productions with 'razor wire, security guard patrols, surveillance posts, and three roll calls each day.' The pay was $50 a week. The allegations include 'Violations of wage and hour laws as well as unfair/illegal business practices actionable under California B&P 17200 Et. Seq.' and a complaint under the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution, which abolished slavery. Members of the group Anonymous praised the summons."

14 of 802 comments (clear)

  1. Re:That's pretty evil. by Xtravar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?

    Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we? And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  2. Re:That's pretty evil. by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you started a little late. The Muslim crusades. The Catholic crusades. The Inquisition. (What a show...) The common thread is people... A corrupt person has no problem using anything as an excuse from religion, to communism, to security, to social justice. No "idea" stays pure once people start to use it.

  3. Re:That's pretty evil. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Religions, though, have the unpleasant architectural problem of (in the vast majority of cases) coupling social and organizational power with strongly implied, or even overt, assertions of trustworthiness.

    Because they purport to deal in moral and divine matters, those who have power within the organization generally(either as an official point of doctrine, or in lay understanding) tend to be imbued with greater "goodness" or "holiness" or access to divine command, or whatever. Priests and CEOs are both potentially dangerous, and quite likely to cover for their buddies; but you don't generally tell children that CEOs are trusted authority figures who deserve their respect and obedience.

  4. Re:Classified as a religion? by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    modded funny, but R2-45 is actually documented Scientology scripture, explained in exactly the same way as the parent post. It's funny because it's 100% true.

  5. Re:That's pretty evil. by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sticky subject that is likely to insult somebody, no matter how you approach it.

    I can say that I have met some Jewish people with questionable business morals, but then again I've met people with NO religious beliefs that are far worse.

    As far as slavery and forced labor goes, the long-running genocide in Darfur is essentially Muslim controlled militias attacking indigenous tribes-people, people that have been a source of slaves for Muslim slavers for hundreds of years.

    The rallying cry for some of the Janjaweed (means "devil on horseback") militia forces has been "Kill the slaves, kill the slaves!"

    But then again, the region where the Janjaweed are killing defenseless, unarmed villagers also happens to center around a government-held oil pipeline that sends 80% of the regions oil to China.

    So maybe religion has nothing to do with it? Maybe some people are just assholes?

    And to complicate matters, some people seem to feel compelled to put Scientology in the same group as Christianity and Islam when we ALL know Scientology is just a big SCAM. It is NOT a religion just because they say it is. It is a scam disguised as a religion.

    Oranges and Apples, my friends...Don't give them the credit they so desire.

  6. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld. That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.

    Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld. That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.

    The barbed wire at Gold Base is on the inside of the fence not on the outside.

  7. No difference than the Christian cult by mlawrence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions. A cult is a cult is a cult. It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.

    1. Re:No difference than the Christian cult by Literaphile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions. A cult is a cult is a cult. It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.

      That's a very poor argument. You can swap out "church" for almost any other childhood activity. For example, soccer:

      My parents forced me to go to soccer every week and play a game on saturday, and during the week I would be forced to go to soccer practice for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive stretches and drills.

      In other words, equating Sunday school and being an altar boy to doing film editing production is silly. The former are childhood activities, not jobs. But I suppose most Slashdotters take any opportunity to bash Christianity (note: I am not a Christian).

  8. Those are not mainstream by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse.

    Yes there are, but nothing on the scale of Scientology. The bigger the group the bigger the target, the harder to keep secrets.

    That's what I mean by being surprised. A local compound in one city? Zero information coming out of that would surprise me. But again, for something as large and well known as scientology... it is odd to me that this has not come forward before and is being practiced at all. They don't need to do this after all, they are making money hand over fist as it is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Re:Classified as a religion? by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yes, in the context it was written and referred to by LRH, it's very easily written off as a joke. The problem is that in courtroom testimony, former COS members have, on a few occasions, admitted that COS management had at least *suggested* that they R2-45 someone, in contexts that could be construed as being serious.

    Hubbard himself gave the order on 6 March 1968, referring to *specific people* in an HCO Ethics order that was seized during an FBI raid. Referring to these once valued Scientologists, LRH said, and I quote, "They are declared Enemies of mankind, the planet and all life." ... " They are fair game." ... and "Any Sea Org member contacting any of them is to use Auditing Process R2-45."

    Would you consider that a joke? If so, it's a pretty bad one.

  10. Re:I Was Surprised by Thagg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're really that terrible. Sorry.

    The very first thing that happens when you're brought into Scientology is that they convince you that all that money you're spending on doctors is wasted, that Scientology will fix everything. Some people with actual life-threatening problems don't survive this phase. Doesn't bother Scientology a bit, though.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  11. Oblig. Fraiser quote by AgentPhunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fraiser (to Niles): "Remember Niles, that which doesn't kill you only makes you stronger."

    Nile: "Yes, but what about the people that don't make it into that second group?"

  12. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by grcumb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allow me to re-phrase that for you:

    Contrary to popular culture, most livestock in the US where fairly well taken care of. It was an enormous investment to purchase and maintain livestock, and the owner wouldn't risk that lightly.

    The problem wasn't the conditions in which slaves were kept; the problem is that human beings were indistinguishable from livestock in the minds of their owners.

    You ought to learn about what the loss of liberty does to a human being before you trot out this useless tripe again.

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  13. Re:Yes... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And confusing "Charged with" with "Found guilty of".

    I think you're confusing "not found guilty" and "not charged" with "innocent"

    Either all these former Scientologists are in some kind of multi-decade conspiracy to slander CoS
    OR the CoS really has been doing horrible things since its founding.
    Which is the more plausible proposition?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!