Linux Reaches 32% Netbook Market Share

christian.einfeldt writes "Linux netbooks have captured 32% of the global netbook market, says Jeff Orr, an analyst with consumer computer research firm ABI Research. The largest share of netbook sales is in the Asia-Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, according to Orr. ABI's latest figures align with a statement by Dell executives in February of this year, to the effect that Linux netbooks comprised about 33% of Dell shipments of Dell Inspiron mini 9s netbooks. These data points cast doubt on claims by Microsoft that Windows XP has captured 98% of the netbook market (a figure Microsoft later revised to 93%). In an interview with DesktopLinux.com, Orr made clear that the 32% Linux netbook market share did not include either user-installed Linux or dual-boot systems, but was confined to just pre-installed Linux shipments."

Comments

A view from Asia-Pacific

[Gadget_Guy]

I live in Australia, and find it quite rare to find Linux based netbooks in shops. They are available, but mostly from the more specialist retailers. Even then they only have very low specs.

I just got back from Singapore, where I was hoping to pick up a cheap Linux netbook to use over there at a conference. Not only were prices similar to Australia for computer stuff, but virtually all the netbooks ran Windows. There were only a couple of places that I came across that offered Linux, and they were not cheap. They also seemed to be older models. I was disappointed.

That said, anyone who is really interested in Linux would not be satisfied with the simplified versions that come with netbooks. If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is. Any cost savings for having Linux seem to be offset by the premium of buying such a rare beast.

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[bcrowell]

If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is. Any cost savings for having Linux seem to be offset by the premium of buying such a rare beast.

I just don't want to put money in Microsoft's pocket for an OS that I have no intention of using. That would mean caving in to the worst kind of abusive monopoly.

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[GlassHeart]

Who said netbooks needed to be low spec?

For now, physics. Small form factor means small battery, which means the CPU can't be too power hungry.

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[Mr. DOS]

Who said netbooks needed to be low spec?

Microsoft. Who only licenses XP Home for use on machines below a certain screen size and spec. I think there may be some restriction on Windows 7 Starter Edition as well.

I know the conversation is "who needs Windows on netbooks?", but it's still at 68% :P

      --- Mr. DOS

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[Anonymous Coward]

I think that's the point. He can't choose what operating system he wants to have without jumping through hoops. He is being responsible and jumping through those hoops in an effort to change the current system - which is a very responsible thing to do, as propagating the current system when you disagree with it is laziness.

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[mjwx]

Netbooks are simply small computers.

There is small, cheap and powerful.

You can only pick two. Netbooks are small and cheap, if you want small and powerful then you aren't looking for a netbook.

Re:A view from Asia-Pacific

[hweimer]

That said, anyone who is really interested in Linux would not be satisfied with the simplified versions that come with netbooks. If you are going to wipe the OS to install your own distro, then it doesn't make a great deal of difference what the original operating system is.

Not quite true. If it comes with some variant of Linux preinstalled then you know that all hardware components will work right out of the box, even if you install a different distro. No hassle with obscure drivers or poorly supported devices like the much-dreaded winmodems.

Whilst I'd love this to be true ...

[baileydau]

Here in Australia you are quite hard pressed to purchase a netbook with Linux pre-installed.

I got my original eeePC 701 with Linux, but my newer S101 *had* to come with Windows. At the time the only machine I could find with Linux was a single Acer Aspire One unit. However my wife had her heart set on the S101 ...

It now has openSUSE (currently 11.2) installed and everything Just Worked (TM), but that wouldn't be included in anyone's statistics (except mine).

Speaking of statistics, I RTFM, and I couldn't actually see where / how they came up with this statistic. Did I miss something??

I wonder if many install Windows themselves

[RichardDeVries]

I'm a Linux user myself, but I just installed XP on a common desktop box tonight and it was painful. Wifi, sound didn't work out of the box, you have to wait ages for all of the updates and SP's to download and install, reboot far too many times and then you have a empty OS almost without useful apps. Some things were hard to get working (Radeon driver installer throwing errors, Wifi driver refusing to work).
I wonder how many 'average' users would get XP, Vista or 7 working on a desktop, let alone a netbook.

Re:I wonder if many install Windows themselves

[RichardDeVries]

Thanks for calling me a troll and the people who modded me uninformed. I think what caused the 'insightful' was:

I wonder how many 'average' users would get XP, Vista or 7 working on a desktop, let alone a netbook.

I didn't say that installing Linux was easy. It's painful as well, and when something doesn't work, you usually have a BIG problem that's not solved by installing a few drivers. I know that. Still, I'd expect the commercial OS'es to have better install routines. Commenters above you tell me Windows has improved in that regard since XP and I believe them. On the other hand, I'm very impressed with e.g. Ubuntu. I've installed it on a couple of very different systems and It Just Works (R, TM etc.) most of the time. That wouldn't impress me if it was a Redmond OS, but it does when it's a community effort. The same feeling causes me to be a bit more forgiving when it comes to installing a Linux distro.
By the way, saying "tweaking and recompiling everything" sound like trolling to me.

Re:Oh really?

[techno-vampire]

And you think that lack of a professional audio workstation proves that Linux isn't ready for the desktop? If so, I've got some late-breaking news for you: only a vanishingly small percentage of computer users need something like that. I'm sure that if enough people needed something like that there'd be a developer working on it.

I can't count how many times I've seen opposition to Linux from short-sighted, narrow-minded people like you who think that their tiny little niche is the be-all and end-all of computers and any OS that doesn't revolve around whatever specialist program they need is out and out trash.

Re:Oblig Simpson Quote

[Anonymous Coward]

Why would someone purchase a linux based laptop at around equal price as a windows one to go through the extra steps to avoid paying $7 for a Windows XP Home License ?

Re:Put me down for 2 netbooks upgraded to linux.

[sc0ob5]

Yes but if he "owns" it is it illegal to download it?

Serious question..