Slashdot Mirror


TSA's Sloppy Redacting Reveals All

A travel blog breaks the story of a poor job of redacting by the TSA: they posted a PDF of airport screening policies, with certain sections blacked out — not realizing that simply laying a black rectangle over the text is hardly sufficient. Cryptome has posted a copy with the redaction removed (ZIP).

12 of 605 comments (clear)

  1. wow by ZosX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    CIA Badges look pretty easy to fake......

  2. Re:Silly by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?

    Is it necessary to reveal them in this manner, or would the interest of the public be served by simply knowing that:

    1. TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered
    2. X-rays have a test procedure
    3. Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals
    4. Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.

    Is it relevant to know the details of those items? If it was related to my FOIA request, perhaps, but I think we should keep in mind that an open government doesn't require fully open records to meet the spirit of an open government.

    If I somehow needed a database from a military hospital for a court case I was involved in, I would hope that any patient records would be anonymized if they weren't necessary for the trial.

    Just as we don't necessarily need to know the exact metrics which cause an x-ray machine to fail an inspection unless we were specifically interested in the testing procedures of x-ray machines.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  3. Re:The TSA redacting process by nacturation · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The TSA is to security what Micheal Vick is to Pet Care

    Slashdot should have a facility to nominate quotes like this for a Slashdot Hall of Fame.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  4. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by JimboG · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forget the laptop battery... On most planes there is a canister of chemicals stored above every seat that when mixed produces oxygen. Combine that with some duty-free Bacardi 151 (You know, the one with the flame retardant top) and the cigarette lighter you bought just before the flight and you could make you're own very effective little bomb right on the plane itself! All these so called security measures are a joke, when things like spirits and cigarette lighters are still allowed on flights. TSA... I'm not even going to start thinking about those morons. It just gets me all angry.

  5. Not the first time I've seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to manage an E-discovery group at a
    lawfirm. We would receive stuff like this from
    opposing council all the time.

    People really are that stupid.

    1. Re:Not the first time I've seen it. by ledow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe the people on the other side were like yourself: your credentials hold no water if you weren't involved enough to spell "counsel" - the word you used means something completely different.

  6. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also, if they bomb the checkpoints what is the response going to be? More checkpoints further out? An infinite array of security checkpoints?

    --
    Not a sentence!
  7. One interesting redacted section by jonwil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    iv. If the individual's photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North
    Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer
    the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee
    screening by the FSD or aircraft operator.

    This section proves that the US Government and the TSA DO target certain groups (in this case people from certain countries) for extra screening (regardless of the individuals who may be members of these groups)

    Are people with a Lebanese or Algerian passport more of a risk than other people? Or is it that these passports are easier for the bad guys to legitimately obtain than any other one?

  8. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's even more complicated than that:
    - It's a well known military adage that you attack your enemy where it is weakest, not strongest.

    A bunch of (relatively) poorly armed civilians attacking well armed, well prepared military targets is at best a form of ritual suicide.

    I would change the definition of terrorist to be somebody that purposefully attacks civilian targets and/or willingly accepts civilian casualties with the objective of terrorizing the civilians into compliance.

    Note that this definition does include state actors - states often act as terrorists.

    Even under this definition, you can still say that some in the Resistance during WW2 were terrorists: the executions of "collaborators" were done to induce compliance in others by terror.

  9. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A barrel roll is actually a 1 G maneuver that if performed correctly no one will notice until they look out their window. You're probably thinking of a snap roll (plane spins around the axis running down the fuselage). This would injure the terrorists... and everyone else on the plane... and break the plane and crash and burn.

    You can perform a barrel roll in Boeing commercial airliners, and someone actually did so with a 707 when they introduced the model during an airshow. You can't do it in an airbus because the computers on those aircraft think they know better than you and will override you if they don't like what you're doing. This has, of course, caused a couple huge accidents. If a Boeing craft doesn't like you, it'll beep a lot, probably shout at you, but won't override you.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  10. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

        I have one better for you.

        I upgraded my ticket at a kiosk for a flight. I love the $75 upgrades. :) My original boarding pass already had "SSSSS" on it, which means I was flagged to be checked. The upgraded ticket also had the "SSSSS" on it. I went through the metal detector. I was patted down, and questioned about my intentions on the flight (Umm, to get from Point A to Point B). Something trivial was taken from me and thrown in the bin, but I don't remember exactly what. My seat? Row 1, Seat C. That put me in the very first row, on the aisle. If I sneezed, the snot would have hit the cockpit door. If I was a security concern for any reason, is that really where you want me?

        At one point during the flight, the pilot came out to use the restroom. The only thing between me and the controls? A petite stewardess. Obviously I had no intention of doing anything bad, since I'm writing this in freedom. :) But, come on, if there was even a hint that I'd do something bad, would it be appropriate to give me the perfect seat to do it from?

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  11. Re:Well, at least the rest don't do this. by tyldis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also, I did WLAN installations at a range of airports as a hired consultant.
    They only checked my police record before issuing me with an access to *all* areas on *every* airport in the country. Not even security officers matched my clearance.

    To make it even 'worse': I had clearance to bring any item or equipment past the security checkpoint, except explosives. I had knives and all sorts of sharp/blunt objects.

    On one occasion I also brought my car and got clearance to bring it on the same side as the airplanes. The security officer who was to inspect my car rolled his eyes to see it filled with ~60 boxes (containing WLAN AP) and decided it was too much of an effort to check the vehicle so I could just pass.

    No interview, deep background checks, nothing before I got clearance. I suspect the cleaning staff have similar clearance (except their equipment might already be inside).

    I guess I was just one of many... It then bothers me endlessly to be stripped of my toothpaste when flying civil (my clearance ended this summer, a ear after I switched jobs...).