Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Announces 3D Blu-ray Format For 2010

Barence writes "Nvidia has announced that 3D Blu-ray movies will begin appearing in 2010. A spokesman confirmed that the Blu-ray Association — to which Nvidia is a contributor — had settled on the 'proper parameters [for] what constitutes a 3D Blu-ray' and claimed the first 3D Blu-ray films would hit the shelves 'towards the end of Summer 2010.' Nvidia will support the standard through its 3D Vision technology, using bit rates of around 60Mbits/second — twice that of a standard movie — although HDMI 1.3 'should have sufficient bandwidth' to ensure smooth playback. New files will be encoded using the MVC-AVC format, which is based on the AVC format currently used by Blu-ray movies.' Update: HotHardware has some additional details, including images of demo hardware.

11 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Remind me why we need (or even want) this? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there some wicked cool technology that's going to work on my existing (brand new) TV without glasses? Will the directors stop putting in just-for-the-effect, in-your-face scenes meant only to remind you the film is "in 3d!" I've watched a couple of modern 3D films at home and - honestly - they're pretty annoying. Then again, maybe I'm just too old.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Remind me why we need (or even want) this? by Meshach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there some wicked cool technology that's going to work on my existing (brand new) TV without glasses? Will the directors stop putting in just-for-the-effect, in-your-face scenes meant only to remind you the film is "in 3d!" I've watched a couple of modern 3D films at home and - honestly - they're pretty annoying. Then again, maybe I'm just too old.

      I would settle for a plot that was at least somewhat plausible. Movies now seem to be just a mixture of scatological jokes and special effects that mask the fact that nothing is actually happening.

      I don't see the port of 3D when there is nothing to watch.

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Remind me why we need (or even want) this? by abigor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's because you see bad movies. There are many good ones released each year. Hope that helps.

    3. Re:Remind me why we need (or even want) this? by Burning1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Will the directors stop putting in just-for-the-effect, in-your-face scenes meant only to remind you the film is "in 3d!"

      Probably about the same time the technology becomes ubiquitous. Remember when Stereo sound was the cool new technology? One need only listen to an old Beatles album to be reminded about how that was abused.

  2. and all of the movies are X Rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And Pornsumers rejoice

  3. Re:New players AGAIN? by DebianDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HA my procrastination pays off AGAIN!

  4. Like that's going to work this time... by mrboyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From TFA

    3D Blu-ray movies will need screens with refresh rates of 120Hz, double the current standard of 60Hz, and 2x speed Blu-ray drives. As with all of Nvidia's 3D products, shutter glasses will be required to view films. The new specification raises concerns about the capability of current hardware to play forthcoming 3D releases, with Berraondo confirming that “future Blu-ray equipment will need more powerful chips” to play content smoothly, with “the majority” of major manufacturers set to release “brand new players” next year.

    I'm sure the people who can afford a fullHD tv@120Hz and a new player to see shrek 3D will rush to buy it. All 20 of them.

  5. 3D glasses the death of this by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Until you can manage 3D without the polarised glasses, I doubt it'll take off as anything more than a novelty. This is more of a barrier than even new hardware requirements. You average viewer wants to be able to relax in front of a movie. Those that don't wear glasses to begin with - ie the majority - can't do that while wearing these glasses. Until you can relax, fall asleep and cuddle or get romantic without having to worry about glasses poking you in the head or eye or getting in the way, it just isn't going to be mainstream.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  6. Re:No need for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You think that's impressive, you should check out a real woman someday!

  7. Re:Color? Why? by MooseMuffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't need to wear special glasses to see color tv.

  8. It will NEVER catch on. by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Never. I'd love to believe that this will be some great new leap forward, but it is just a massive mis-step by a company trying to find new revenue streams. BR adoption is tepid at best, and that doesn't even exclude most of the population by requiring special glasses. It's always been a gimmick and nothing more. 3D offers very little to the viewer and certainly not enough to warrant wearing glasses for every movie you sit down to watch. Majorly flawed.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea