Slashdot Mirror


After Berlusconi Attack, Italy Considers Web Censorship

An anonymous reader writes "The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours. However, the planned clampdown on Internet hate speech sparked a heated debate over censorship and freedom of expression, leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn."

160 comments

  1. Control by JohnHegarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Must be very hard for Mr Berlusconi that there is media he doesn't control.

    For anyone not familiar with Italy he already owns all the major tv stations and newspapers.

    1. Re:Control by pmontra · · Score: 1

      All the major newspapers? As far as I know he owns Il Giornale. Could you name other newspapers he owns?

    2. Re:Control by migla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On my to-watch-list, there's a recent-ish documentary about Berlusconis Italy, titled "Videocracy". http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1500516/

      http://www.atmo.se/film-and-tv/videocracy/ :

      In a videocracy the key to power is the image.

      In Italy one man only has kept the domination of the image over three entire decades. As a TV-magnate and then as Presidente, Silvio Berlusconi has created a perfect system of TV-entertainment and politics. [...] ...a remarkable story, born out of the scary reality of TV-republic Italy, a country where the step from TV-showgirl to Minister for Gender Equality is only natural.

      Coming soon to a festival (or internet) near you!

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    3. Re:Control by emanem · · Score: 4, Informative

      Il Giornale
      Libero (his ex-wife controls it but de-facto he is)
      Oggi
      Chi

    4. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about, e.g., Libero ?

    5. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      He owns Il Giornale, via his brother Paolo. Il Foglio, it is owned by his recently divorcing wife. Mondadori, the biggest italian publisher, with a myriad of magazines, is in the hands of his daughter Marina. About the latter, he has just been sentenced guilty of taking over Mondadori by means of corruption back in 1990 and will have to pay 750 megaeuros. Mediaset is controlled by Piersilvio, his son, and owns 3 private national channels out of 7 plus a bunch of digital tv channels. Other than these, are the three national tv channels of RAI (state television) which is mostly controlled by the government.
      If this is not enough, well... unfortunely he has way much more power than this...

      by the way
      what do ./ers think of the aggression itself? I mean... is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?

    6. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is hardly "all major italian newspaper", obviouslt :/

      This internet filtering nonsense is silly and shouldn't even be discussed, obviously.

    7. Re:Control by emanem · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the point sit. In Italy they don't sell many newspapers...btw he does control 35% of the biggest newspaper (Il Corriere) as well..
      Anyway the majority of information is broadcast through TV which he controls (50% as prime minister) and owns (50% his own TV stations).
      You sir, don't know what you're talking about.

    8. Re:Control by emanem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Btw sorry I got confused... he owns so many... :-P
      Libero is owned by his brother Paolo
      Il Foglio is owned by his ex-wife
      and he owns (through his publishing company) ona of the biggest quotes of Il Corriere (the most famous italian newspaper)...

    9. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      750 megaeuros

      Is that really how they count euros? If not, it is too precious by half, and I implore you to stop it right now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as controlling his image, his image didn't look so hot after he took a nice beating.

      About 90 percent of the world was heartened to see that at least one single human was able to express to his political leader what he felt in a direct and honest manner, and in a way that the politician could not ignore.

      The image of Berlusconi's well-fed and dissolute face all battered and bloody was a message to the world: There is yet hope.

      Salute!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Control by dkf · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to have two broken teeth, broken nose, and a white shirt with no red stain?

      It depends on how fast someone got in with something to mop up the blood. I guess that was pretty quick (the video of the events was pretty confused...) We also don't know the extent to which his teeth were damaged; "broken" might be a mistransation of (the Italian word for) "chipped" or "cracked".

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    12. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if there were no broken theeth and nose. The souvenir barely hit him, if you look at the videos you can see his head doesn't even move when it impacts. If somethings hits you with enough force to break 2 theeth and your nose, your head is bound to shake around like a springy-bouncing-head-car-thingy. Unless you're superman.

    13. Re:Control by HNS-I · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, anyone with a brain was thinking that Berlusconi would be able to use this attack to his advantage immediately. This is not the way to change politics. I can't say feel sorry for him but I wouldn't wish him this attack. If you ask me the Italians get the premier they deserve, Berlusconi is promoting corruption from top to bottom and that is why the people keep him in power. At the end of the day it is the people who keep watching his tv-channels.

    14. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does control 35% of the biggest newspaper, il Corriere? No, he doesn't. And you obviously never read il Corriere or it would have been apparent even to you.
      Quite on the contrary, Berlusconi owns/control a little share of the newspaper/magazine market. That Italians do not enjoy freedom of the press is routinely repeated on the same media that supposedly are in Berlusconi's hands.

    15. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't mind, if someone they don't like gets punched. News at 11.

    16. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlusconi may own "just" some newspapers and other magazines, plus his TV networks, but he also owns some of the biggest advertising companies in Italy, which gives him nearly total control over what is being published. If a newspaper or TV station he doesn't own publishes some news he doesn't like, advertisers start magically fleeing away from there. It happened already.

    17. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be entirely fair, there were some pages on faceboook theorizing the killing of Mr Berlusconi. Now some politician belonging to his political alliance (not him so, as Mr Berlusconi hasn't spoken yet) are taking advantage of what happened suggesting various censoring laws. It must also be stressed however that very few people on his coalition would speak without his consent as they could be politically and personally destroyed if they were not aligned to his will (for example one newspaper belinging to him destroyed the reputation of another newspaper director with charges of homosexuality and crimson)

    18. Re:Control by xororand · · Score: 1

      Even if it's not the popular way to count currencies, it's certainly not a bad idea. How much is 1 billion again?

    19. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      750 megaeuros

      Is that really how they count euros?

      No, it's not.

    20. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - its not just that berlusconi is on the right, he's a filthy criminal.

      you're the one who's deluded, just coz he's a right winger it seems its ok that he should be the most corrupt politician in recent european history and an incredibly vain swine.

      throwing an alabaster statuette like that was a seriously glorious act, and it made me laugh everytime i saw the footage. probably always will.

    21. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a leftie I'll tell you that if Obama was in bed with the Mafia, corrupted judges, silenced protesters, put criminals and dancers in power, wrote laws that take freedoms away from people and laws that protect him from prosecution, he would well deserve to be beaten. Or worse.

    22. Re:Control by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      How much is 1 billion again?

      Very nearly enough for an intimate working lunch for 2 in Brussels, at least as far as expense claims go.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:Control by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1
      There are three major players in the TV market in Italy: Rai, Mediaset and Sky.
      • Rai is owned by the state, and runs three major TV channels (Rai 1, Rai 2, Rai 3). The various parties exert some control on the different channels: it's not the case that the majority takes all. There is a parliamentary commission that watches over Rai, and it is controlled by the opposition.
      • Mediaset is owned by Berlusconi, and runs three major TV channels (Canale 5, Italia 1, Rete 4).
      • Sky is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and controls the entirety of the satellite TV market (the others use terrestrial broadcasting). It is the same size as Mediaset in terms of revenue, and is growing faster. Murdoch hates Berlusconi.

      As for newspapers, the two main Italian papers are La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera.

      • La Repubblica is owned by Carlo De Benedetti, who hates Berlusconi. It follows a very strong anti-Berlusconi line.
      • Il Corriere is owned by a collection of financial and industrial interests. They don't like Berlusconi. The paper itself generally follows a moderate line. It officially endorsed Berlusconi's opponents in the past.
      • Berlusconi controls the newspaper Il Giornale, which is far smaller than Corriere or Repubblica. Libero, which is smaller yet than Il Giornale, supports Berlusconi, but is actually owned by a completely unrelated entrepeneur (Angelucci). Il Foglio is a tiny, tiny "opinion" paper owned by Berlusconi's divorcing wife.

      There are other players in both the TV and newspaper market (especially the latter), but these are the most significant ones. To sum up, while Berlusconi has a larger control of the media than we would like, he does not "own all the major tv stations"; in fact, he doesn't even own half. The claim that he owns "all newspapers" is plain nonsense, he owns a small minority.

      Another thing to bear in mind is that in Italy, as in most countries, educated people generally lean to the left. To make TV programs, or write news, you need artists and journalists, who mostly lean to the left. The only exception is Rete 4's news, but only old people watch it.

    24. Re:Control by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Hate crimes are meh but that doesn't mean the fact that an attack motivated purely by the color of one's skin or choice of religion shouldn't be taken in account when it comes to sentencing.

      That said, I can understand the feeling of having all options exhausted and all you have left is your fists (or a hammer or a bulldozer armored with concrete).

    25. Re:Control by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Let's try to recap.

      Paolo Berlusconi is the owner of Il giornale through a couple of companies. Does he owns also Libero? I couldn't research who's in the board of Editoriale Libero (the controlling company) but for sure it's a newspaper with positions quite close to Berlusconi.

      Mrs Lario (wife of Berlusconi but about to be ex-wife) owns 38% of Il Foglio. I missed that, thanks.

      But how about this supposed 35% share of Il Corriere? Il Corriere is owned by RCS Mediagroup and its shareholders are listed on Consob site. Which companies on the list belong to Berlusconi?

    26. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're talking out of your ass. every major newspeaper in italy lives of institutionalized yearly bailouts from political affiliations.

      also it's owned by rcs, which is owned by gemina, which is controlled by mediobanca, which is part of the berlusconi empire (there are some more steps, but the money comes from there) and this casts a big shadow over corriere operations

      also, just by reading his article you know that is a self censored news outled. nobody actally question anything from their sources, that is the most evident evidence of this. for example nobody actually reminded tremonti that he was, in 1994, pushing the american model of derivates trading onto italy, and failed by a slight margin, when he said in 2009 that was his operation that saved italy from the crisis.

    27. Re:Control by malkien · · Score: 1

      I watched an analysis of the last few moments leading to the aggression.
      It's surprising how the whole security team spectacularly failed at protecting him.
      The aggressor had several seconds to actually take aim from a few feet away.
      This is a little beyond incompetent. I'm not sure how far beyond...

      The only certainty is that this event did wonders for his falling popularity.
      Here in Italy everybody is cheering for him at the moment.

    28. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a leftie I'll tell you that if Obama was in bed with the Mafia, corrupted judges, silenced protesters, put criminals and dancers in power, wrote laws that take freedoms away from people and laws that protect him from prosecution, he would well deserve to be beaten. Or worse.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! So you've just declared open season on Obama, right?

    29. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he is just trying to seem intelligent, we (the super advanced alien species which inhabits Europe) count euros like you count dollars.

    30. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't be that hard. The government tries to pass a net censorship law because someone threw a cheap souvenir at a prime minister.

      STOP - souvenir throwing and net censorship?

      How are the two linked? Nobody asking?

    31. Re:Control by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Obama is on the right too.

    32. Re:Control by operagost · · Score: 1

      He should get ducking lessons from George W. Bush.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    33. Re:Control by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      While it was great to see Berlusconi take one in the face, it's even funnier when the politicians fight back.

    34. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No: Silvio Berlusconi does not officially own any Italian newspaper (I think he would lose the rights to TV broadcasting if he did),
      however:
      * his brother owns "Il Giornale"
      * his (ex) wife owns "Il Foglio"
      * "Libero" belongs to a family that has business with hospitals, and that is elected in Berlusconi's party
      * his family owns Mondadori (the biggest publishing company in Italy, apparently bought thanks to a corrupted judge)
      * his family is a member of the group controlling "Il corriere della sera", the biggest newspaper in Italy (this happened quite recenlty)
      * he directly controls three TV channels (that's half of the TV ads revenue and almost half the audience)
      * he controls through the goverment the three state owned TV channels (the other half of the audience)
      * the remaining national TV channels broadcast music videos or are watched by less than 5% of the population
      * newspapers in Italy are not as widespread as TV (and internet even less so), and the vast majority of the Italian people uses TV as the one and only source of information
      * he owns a soccer team, a bank, an insurance company and so on...
      * Italy's antitrust law (written by one of his previous goverments) states that his only obligation when he is Prime Minister is this: he cannot be the president of A.C. Milan (yes, he owns it, and now A.C. Milan is without an official president, even though everyone knows who is)

    35. Re:Control by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Wow. For real, bloodthirsty hate it takes a leftist.

      Oh don't be ridiculous. Hatred isn't the preserve of either of the fictional factions popularly called Left and Right. Anyone with a brain doesn't consider themselves "right" or "left", because they know that you can't divide policy into two arbitrary blocs and say one is good and the other bad. The brainwashing that has gone on in the USA is staggering. I think some people would actually have anurisms when confronted with someone like myself (anti-abortion, pro-gun ownership, anti-Iraq war, anti-Bush, socialist who disliked Obama). How the the general US mindset got economic models so muddled up with so many other non-economic issues is jaw-dropping.

      And I despise Berlusconi as do most educated Italians, but I don't condone hitting a 75-old man with a statuette no matter how corrupt that man may be.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    36. Re:Control by malkien · · Score: 1

      he already took many lessons from him.
      I only wish he also learned to duck, 'cause now he's more popular then ever.

    37. Re:Control by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Hey , it seems we have a lot in common ( i share all your points ).
      What's your opinion on death sentencing ? Personally , i'm against it .

    38. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know us Anonymous Cowards were given a last name!

    39. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If someone did that to obama you'd be screaming racism

      Actually, as a dedicated leftist, at the moment I don't think I'd mind all that much.

      So, no contradiction here.

      And I guess it takes a really dedicated righty to try to defend a corrupt sleazebag like Berlusconi.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    40. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Obama is on the right too.

      As we have learned in the past two weeks, he is no less a corporatist than was George W. Bush or Bill Clinton.

      I made excuses for Barack Obama for more than a year, pinning my hopes on someone who has turned out to be an empty facade, willing to throw Americans under the bus in order to curry favor with powerful corporations.

      After his betrayal on health care reform, now I want to see the goddamn birth certificate, too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    41. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      anti-abortion, pro-gun ownership, anti-Iraq war, anti-Bush, socialist who disliked Obama

      You turned out to be right about Obama.

      I agree with your other stances, except abortion. That's between a woman and her doctor. But I'm also a pro-gun, anti-Iraq War, anti-Bush socialist.

      And as of now, anti-Obama, too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    42. Re:Control by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This is not the way to change politics.

      There is no way to change politics. We will always be outgunned by rich corporations. The best we can hope for is the occasional satisfaction of seeing something painful befall a corrupt politician.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    43. Re:Control by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      As you've asked, I am against the death penalty. I don't see revenge as a supportable reason for punishing people. Supportable punishments for harming others are restitution, protection of society and (as a preferable consequence of these two) discouragement to others to do the same. The reason most commonly put forward for capital punishment is to discourage people from committing the capital crime due to fear of this "ultimate punishment". It demonstrably fails in this regard. Anyone who doesn't regard years or decades of their life imprisoned as being a reason not to do something has likely lost their capacity to weigh consequences against their actions. People who murder are either past caring or think they wont get caught. Capital punishment does nothing for either of these. The other reason put forward for the death penalty is "justice". I personally just file that under "revenge" (see earlier).

      If someone has harmed another, I would see them try to make good that debt rather than not. Some debts cannot be repayed (murder for example), but some good can be done. That said, some of us would rather die than undergo some of the punishment that gets inflicted on people in the USA, coming out of prison years later beaten and abused and turned into a worse person than when you went in.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    44. Re:Control by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      I agree with your other stances, except abortion. That's between a woman and her doctor. But I'm also a pro-gun, anti-Iraq War, anti-Bush socialist.

      If someone didn't take precautions and wants to pick up the morning after pill early on, then I wont condemn them. If someone has a medical reason not to have a child or it was forced on them, then I can sympathise even though its sad. But by the time you get to late-term abortions, that's a living, recognizable child. It may well bend your life in a different direction than you meant if you carry that child to term, but I don't see it as an option when the alternative is to kill that child. Give it up for adoption afterwards if you wish - there are plenty of couples waiting to raise it - but don't kill it for the sake of another six months of physical discomfort or guilt. That's where I'm coming from. But again, here is something that I find myself caught between two angry factions that both condemn my views. You have a militant "a woman's right" lobby who howl in fury if you dare to say someone is wrong for killing that child, or like to turn away from the facts and pretend that its just tissue, not really life yet. And on the other, you have a largely religious faction that judge my views a moral affront against God. It is so similar to the "Right / Left" polarising that its hard to consider it accidental. Where is the space for non-hardline non-religious people who don't wish to inherit the baggage of one loud faction or the other?

      Don't get me wrong, btw. I don't have any issue with you for having a different stance on abortion than I do. We can resent people for their actions, but beliefs are things that we can discuss civilly. At any rate, the problem is the same as in politics - a dividing into rival factions that claim positions as ideologies and deny those positions to outsiders. Anti-abortion "belongs" to the Right. Free health care "belongs" to the Left (or would if what the Democrats were pushing actually was this). Sure you can on a personal level say you want a little from both, but in practice who do you vote for? That's how it works. Deny people a choice and they'll fight you. Give them a choice between two outcomes that you control both of, and people will nod and pick one.

      It's like the magician's shell game. The trick isn't making you pick a cup that doesn't have a ball under it. The trick is making you think that its under any of them at all. Until the US gets over its factionalism (which is difficult because it requires accepting you're not always right), then its going to continue choosing one empty cup after another.

      Anyway, its good to see someone else walking away from the table. I'm European so I don't get much say in US politics. ;) But hopefully you're American and do. A common perception of Americans is that they're overly proud of their country and think its super-special. The thing is, at base, there are some good reasons for that. You have one of the best foundations for a democracy we've ever seen - it was put together by people who really thought about what they were doing. The free speech enshrined in your country is far ahead of most of the world, even most of Western Europe. I would, despite not being American, sincerely like to see that country live up to being a good world leader again.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    45. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes AC -- another AC just declared open season on your President.

    46. Re:Control by badpazzword · · Score: 1

      So when you write 2k$...

      --
      When ideas fail, words become very handy.
    47. Re:Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that one day somebody will bash his face in. (And all others like him).

    48. Re:Control by giuda · · Score: 1

      Videocracy sucks. It's an absolute ripoff. It's a documentary about people that do everything to go on TV.

  2. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just goes to show, politicians everywhere dont like a medium that allows the little guy to have a voice.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm sorry to say this, but there's an astonishingly high number of facts that show that your forecast is just wishful thinking. The first that comes to mind: the sex scandals of Noemi Letizia, D'Addario, the infamous Lodo Alfano. And these aren't nearly the worst ones, just the ones people know about, and just go "meh, we can't do anything about it".

      Just so that you know: with astonishingly perfect timing, the "assault" helped covering the privatization of the Italian Army, hidden in the Finanziaria. No television obviously has spoken about it, and a google news search brings up four (4) results about it.

      If this Internet censhorship thing goes on, I'm confident it will easily be worked around by anyone with a little bit of computer knowledge, because they're too stupid to do things with the help from people that know what they're doing. But that's a puny consolation, because most of the people won't be willing/able to do what will be necessary to work around it.

      I f$%&/n' hate being italian.

    2. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sadly confirm all of the above.

    3. Re:Hrmm by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      If you disagree with the current politician's policies, run on your own platform. Simple as that. If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved. If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail. Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that. Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless. i.e. Put Up or Shut Up :)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Hrmm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I f$%&/n' hate being italian.

      You know paisan, I felt the same way after I saw that Jersey Shore TV show.

      Disgrazia!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What platform are you going to run on if you can't even get the word out?

    6. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know the slightest thing about Italy and it's government, do you?

    7. Re:Hrmm by iamhassi · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not surprised Italy is having a problem with the internet after they sentenced Amanda Knox to 26 years on 100% circumstantial evidence that would be laughable even for a TV drama. What other BS do you want to do Italy? My wife wanted to go someday but not now, not ever.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    8. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they have experienced terrorism in Italy before, both from the left and from the right. So at least they know the how the little guy reacts as he is robbed from his voice.

    9. Re:Hrmm by Abreu · · Score: 1

      If you disagree with the current politician's policies, and you are a millionaire, run on your own platform. Simple as that. If the population agrees with you, change occurs and problem solved.

      I tend to dislike FIFY posts, but this seemed inevitable...

      If you're actively censored, you can retaliate with force, and you should (but won't) ultimately be supported by the courts if your efforts fail. Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and all that. Bitching about being put down by the man is worthless. i.e. Put Up or Shut Up :)

      Open insurrection would only cause accusations of terrorism from the ruling cadre and you will end up killed by the forces of the goverment.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I disagree with democracy as a whole.??

      I often get the "If you dont like it here you can just leave".
      But can I really, where do I go if I dont want any part of your fucked up society. I would love to "just get out", but there is no place for me to escape to. So whats left for me? Terrorism??

      Yes I am an anarchist.

  3. They never learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OR, the Italian government could use this as an opportunity to gauge the public disapproval for their senior politicians.

  4. If this were a nobody that was attacked by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

    The government would treat it just like any other case, even with such a facebook group.

    It never ceases to amaze me how the government uses high-profile cases to grab at power and suppress the people while having their whole-hearted support of such measures. The patriot act comes to mind. (Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.)

    These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.

    1. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by furball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Patriot Act is intended to focus on groups of people organizing to carry out a planned action. It doesn't do anything for single crazy acting on their own.

      What allowed Nidal Hasan to kill people was rampant political correctness.

      Whether what Nidal Hasan did constitutes terrorism is still open for debate. The typical things we identify with terrorism such as a political cause, message, or grievance is still unidentified. When a combatant buries an IED, we can assume that his issue is that the US leaves Iraq/Afghanistan. What's Nidal Hasan's gripe? His deployment? The US's role in the Middle East? Does anyone know? Does he even have one? When is an act terrorism and when is it just simple murder?

      Is the shooting at Virginia Tech terrorism? Or is it only terrorism if the perpetrator is Muslim?

    2. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by FinchWorld · · Score: 1, Informative
      The patriot act comes to mind. (Which, btw, did nothing to stop Nidal Hasan from killing people.)

      Dear Citizen,

      The Patriot Act was infact a great help it stopping Nidal Hasan from killing more people than he did! Infact, if we allow full wiretapping, remove all that paperwork that gets in the way of stopping police from stopping and searching you, as well as any probable cause requirements involved, this would never have happenned! It just turns out the soft liberal types, who are first to defend cartoon depictions of child pornography, obviously direct support for paedophiles I might add, which prevents us from keeping you safe from terrorists (You do remember 9/11 right?).

      Our inability to stop and hold suspects without probable cause gives them time to destroy all evidence of there terrorist or paedophilic activities! This is why it is vital to detain them imediately so that such evidence can be found, and justice served! Won't you please think of the children?

      Signed, Your bought Politician.

      For those interested they can already do this in the UK, US I'm not so sure.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    3. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Patriot Act is intended to focus on groups of people organizing to carry out a planned action. It doesn't do anything for single crazy acting on their own.

      And yet the FBI had plenty of tips about the hijackers before the actual attack.

      What allowed Nidal Hasan to kill people was rampant political correctness.

      Perhaps it was simply the same bloated bureacracy that fail before 9/11, which got warning signs but the signals got lost in the chain of command because they're too busy spying on the emails of millions of others.

      When is an act terrorism and when is it just simple murder?

      Is the shooting at Virginia Tech terrorism? Or is it only terrorism if the perpetrator is Muslim?

      Terrorism is a tactic designed to invoke a specific psychological reaction.

      The way past US leadership uses it is a catch-all phrase to grab power:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW8Bj1upbJQ

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW8Bj1upbJQ

    4. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by FuckingNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or is it only terrorism if the perpetrator is Muslim?

      It is terrorism precisely when the word "terrorism" brings out the right sentiment in those listening to you.

      The British were terrorising Catholics in Northern Ireland. The IRA were terrorising the English in London. The ANC was terrorising the white government in apartheid South Africa. The apartheid government was terrorising the black majority. Jews terrorised Arab villages and British hotels. Arabs terrorise Jewish women and children in marketplaces.

    5. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure the Patriot Act didn't help and was treasonous to pass in the first place, but neither did "liberal" policies such as gun control. It was making domestic military bases into gun-free zones that allowed Hasan to go around mowing down people without hindrance. More guns were most certainly the solution there and until people realize "gun-free-zone" translates into "sitting-duck-zone" this sort of thing will continue to happen. -1 off-topic, I know.

    6. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Telephone intercepts are not admissible evidence in UK courts.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, quite right, I should have added its mostly the detaining part.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    8. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps it was simply the same bloated bureacracy that fail before 9/11, which got warning signs but the signals got lost in the chain of command because they're too busy spying on the emails of millions of others."

      The GP was referring to the fact that Hasan's medical supervisors treated him differently because he was a Muslim and gave him third, fourth, and fifth chances that they would not have given other students.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    9. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      "The Patriot Act is intended to focus on groups of people organizing to carry out a planned action. It doesn't do anything for single crazy acting on their own."

      Except that intelligence agencies and the FBI were already aware that Osama Bin Laden was planning something big, that members of his group had been traveling under false identities, and that at least two of them were in the United States prior to the attack. The President had been sent a memo that there was a very high likelihood that Osama Bin Laden's men would hijack airplanes as part of an attack on the United States.

      Lack of intelligence gathering authority was not the problem. The problem was that a new administration was in power, and that administration was too busy firing people from the previous administration to bother listening to the warnings coming from the experts.

      "is it only terrorism if the perpetrator is Muslim?"

      It is only terrorism if you are fighting against the United States, our interests, or our allies and their interests. If you are fighting against a government we would be happy to see leave, you are a heroic freedom fighter; if you are fighting against a government we do not particularly care about, it is just a civil war. As soon as you start fighting against any US interest -- even the interests of private corporations -- you are a terrorist regardless of what color your skin is or what religion you practice.

      Case in point: nobody is calling any of the parties to the war in Congo terrorists, even though they are brutally raping, maiming, and killing civilians. That is just a civil war, as far as the media is concerned. Now, when warlords in Afghanistan shoot at US soldiers, they are not simply an enemy army -- they are terrorists. They are terrorists because they are shooting at Americans. When they were shooting at Russians, they were freedom fighters. If they were shooting at each other, it would be a civil war.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    10. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These type of things shows you the true stripes of those in power, and who should be voted out ASAP.

      If only voting actually worked, letting the many incompetent decide who is competent is a really bad idea. On a personal note, any celebrity that goes into politics have my support, just for the amusement factor. I wish my country had a governator.

      BTW. love the scene in Religulous with the Texas senator...

      Bill Maher: See, this is my problem, is, I'm trying - I mean, you're - you're a Senator. You are one of the very few people who are really running this country. It worries me that people are running my country who think - who believe in a talking snake. Um...
      Mark Pryor: You don't have to pass an IQ test to be in the Senate, though.

      His facial expression is just priceless *chuckle*.

    11. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm tending towards him being a disgruntled nutjob, no different, really, than Timothy McVey or postal nutso Patrick Sherrill. The fact that he's Muslim seems only to go to motive. The guy was clearly a ticking time bomb, whose only advantage, as happens so many times in these cases, was that for peculiar reasons, no one seemed willing to bounce him out at the first warning signs.

      But it serves a political end to move him out of the disgruntled nutjob category and into the terrorist category.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this, if you haven't already: http://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0805079831

      Using economic, military or environmental shocks to introduce what would be otherwise unpopular laws or legislation on a stunned public has been the paradigm of almost every new economically neo-liberal state in the past 40 years.

    13. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Whether what Nidal Hasan did constitutes terrorism is still open for debate.

      And entirely irrelevant. 12 people are dead whether it was terrorism or not.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And don't forget the Americans terrorizing the British East India Company in Boston.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... We've done a lot better than that lately.

      --
      That is all.
    16. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, mods, GP is troll and parent is offtopic. Get your act together.

    17. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      The RIAA and MPAA are terrorizing the youth of the world with the threat of financial ruin.

    18. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      The Patriot Act is intended to focus on groups of people organizing to carry out a planned action. It doesn't do anything for single crazy acting on their own.

      And yet the FBI had plenty of tips about the hijackers before the actual attack.

      I don't disagree with your general premise, but I'm having a hard time figuring out how your statement logically contradicts his.

      I'm presuming that the 'hijackers' you are referring to are the 9/11 hijackers. That was a case of a group of organized people, not a single crazy person. The failure of the FBI to act indicates something wrong with the system as it was at the time. It does not seem to indicate that the patriot act was meant to counter single crazy people, nor does it indicate that the Patriot Act not was at least intended to to focus on organized groups of people. (I do not believe the GP was attempting to make any sort of statement about the effectiveness of the Patriot Act in its apparent intended focus).

      I'm just not seeing how "the patriot act was not meant to catch individual crazies" and "the FBI failed to stop the 9/11 attacks despite tipoffs" are mutually exclusive. Genuinely curious as to what you were driving at here.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    19. Re:If this were a nobody that was attacked by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I think the tar and feathering of loyalists was more terrorism. Seemed to put quite a damper on that portion of the people who disagreed with the revolt.
      Be interesting to know what percent of the population was pro-revolt.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  5. Please Do It, Italy! by netsharc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they do go ahead with it, the serious backlash will surely bring down the Berlusconi regime. Or is this just wishful thinking? His media power has really brainwashed the majority of citizens there..

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by daveime · · Score: 1

      It might possibly bring down the Berlusconi regime, but then it'll be Prodi's turn again and he'll fuck it up like always. Expect Silvio in power again after a nice little 6 month vacation.

      The problem in Italy is not that people are "brainwashed" by Silvio, it's just that he sucks slightly less than the only other choice.

    2. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wishful thinking. I have yet to see a backlash against proposed or actual censorship, even in countries that have a strong freedom of speech culture.

      This little blip will not bring down Musso^H^H^HBerlusconi.

    3. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by tsa · · Score: 1

      If the EU had any balls they would have kicked Italy out long ago because of Berlusconi's behaviour.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I undestand the whining about thye mod system. the above post was incorrectly submitted as a reply to another post, but got modded +1 Informative anyway. The same post, copypasted here (the intended target), got modded -1 Redundant, even if the only thing that it had in common with the other posts was the confirmation of wishful thinking... duh.

    5. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem in Italy is not that people are "brainwashed" by Silvio, it's just that he sucks slightly less than the only other choice.

      Having only two choices when the population of Italy is nearly 60 million sounds like the bigger problem :)

    6. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse - you could be British :(

    7. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual reason Berluscon is able to stay in power is because Italy is full of goombahs and guidos who are too self-centered and clueless to do anything about this situation. In a real European country Berluscon's media network and political party would've been boycotted into oblivion long ago.

      Instead the only viable alternative to Berluscon's administration is a left-wing coalition which makes the Socialist Party USA look like a bastion of free-market thinking. (For the record, it fielded candidates with a Commy background both in the 2008 PM election and in Italy's nomination for the EU's high representative. Eastern European countries especially were not impressed by the latter stunt.)

    8. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about a country with 300 millions and two choices?

    9. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This little blip will not bring down Musso^H^H^HBerlusconi.

      Musso is currently quite irrelevant... http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Musso

    10. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you brainless little gimp - eastern europe has fallen apart since the fall of communism. not everyone wants to be sucking up to the west or the catholic church. wake up you deluded gimp!!!

    11. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem in Italy is not that people are "brainwashed" by Silvio, it's just that he sucks slightly less than the only other choice.

      I keep hearing that a lot from right-wingers, almost as they are trying to justify themselves for voting someone as corrupt as Berlusconi.
      I don't know if they really believe that.

    12. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having only two choices when the population of Italy is nearly 60 million sounds like the bigger problem :)

      In the past, italians had so many "choices" (up to 13, in the early '90 if my memory serves me well) that the only way to governate this country was by coalitions formed after voting that broke up early and easily.

      Italy had 38 prime ministers in 63 years of republic, that's slighly more than one year and a half per mandate. You can't do any serious long-term planning this way, and that's why italians went for a "2 parties way" in the early '90. Which apparently was somewhat better than before, but isn't really working, because in the end it's the same political parties as before (less the extreme leftist) grouped in two coalitions formed before voting, with one apparently holding together better than the other (likely because of the great influence Berlusconi has on traditional media and economics).

    13. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, in what way is Prodi worse than Berlusconi? It looks like the brainwashing works just fine.

    14. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The probem is not Prodi, but rather the leftist coalition which used to support him and now no longer does. They make the Socialist Party USA look like a bastion of free-market thinking.

      Just look at their recent candidacies: Prodi was NOT on the 2008 PM ticket, Walter Veltroni was. For Italy's nomination for the EU's high representative they chose Massimo Dalema. Both candidates come from a former Commy background, and Dalema's EU bid failed due to opposition from Eastern European countries. Italians do NOT support Veltroni or Dalema any more than they suport Berlosconi.

    15. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

      It's cute that you think there are two choices.

    16. Re:Please Do It, Italy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth nothing that Prodi retired from politics just after his goverment collapsed (at the hand of the obviously-left-wing-swinging judges, of course!).

  6. Wrong response by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last thing you do is try and stop people from hearing about it. You make light of it, show it as not a big deal, and move on.

    "Yeah, some guy hit me with a souvenir... Oh well, shit happens! The security guards are stepping it up a notch or two, but it's not like I was shot or anything. Thanks god, you know? Wouldn't want to leave my wife having to look for an inferior lover! Vote for me, you guys... I'm easy going."

    And the world moves on.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Wrong response by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Eh, she's leaving him it seems. At least, that's what SHE SAID!

  7. A partial U-turn by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Funny

    Usually, we just call that "turning left" (or right, depending on your country)

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:A partial U-turn by deepsky · · Score: 1

      In case of a right-wing government like this one, a partial U-turn is probably a left turn.

    2. Re:A partial U-turn by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      A J-turn or L-turn, depending on direction.

    3. Re:A partial U-turn by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think in most fonts a J turn ends up being equivalent to a U turn. Those damned serif fonts will screw up your turns every time though.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  8. Italy defines FACISM !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is what it is, and it's weird to be Italy !!

  9. So this is how it is going to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Create some incident. Any incident will do.
    2. Blame it on people on the web. You can call them "terrorists", if necessary.
    3. Censor the web. The more the better. Pass some bill overnight if necessary.
    4. If someone in media raises questions about censorship, publish some irrelevant "scandal" to deflect public attention.
    5. ???
    6. Profit!

    If that doesn't work completely, continue boiling the frog, rinse and repeat.

    Surely profit, but not for us, folks. You are screwed, wherever on this Earth you are.

    1. Re:So this is how it is going to happen? by kvezach · · Score: 1

      It's more general than that:

      1. Create some incident, or wait for one to happen.
      2. Blame it on [insert group here]. It's better if you can find evidence to this effect, but not critical.
      3. Propose countermeasures against said group in particular, and more strict authority in general, to solve #2.
      4. If someone objects, discredit them with accusations of being one of them, and/or distract the public. 5. Profit!^W Power!

    2. Re:So this is how it is going to happen? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      2. Blame it on [insert group here]

      Canada?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  10. this reminds me... by papabob · · Score: 1

    I think it's in "Forever Peace" where the goverment nukes a city (Denver?) and acusses the then new 'nanotechnology' of the incident to take control over every production line and create a politicians-controlled monopoly.

    Maybe in 50 years we discover that the attacker is a member of the AISI (italian intelligence agency); or maybe not, because the web would be controlled by government...

  11. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we'd get all the jokes and justifications here if Berlusconi was a "progressive" and the attacker an "extreme right-winger".......

    1. Re:I wonder by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Yeah what a bunch of stupid sheeple here, agreeing with the points of view that they themselves hold.

    2. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do read the posts you will see none of them actually speaks about Berlusconi's politics.

      Rightwing or leftwing, it does not matter. His reputation is what's really killing Italy's image to the world.

  12. Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction.... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction by a government, the first thought that pops into my head is "Oh, my. Are they nuclear?"

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    1. Re:Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I see a knee-jerk reaction by a government, the first thought that pops into my head is "Oh, my. Are they nuclear?"

      Yes, usually. Getting nuclear weapons is a knee-jerk reaction, hence every government with the lack of intellectual reasoning and the means to create or buy nuclear weapons, have nuclear weapons. The same goes for chemical and biological weapons, cluster bomb mines and other such atrocities.

      More reasonable governments don't have nuclear weapons. As an example, Sweden had experimental nuclear weapons in the early 60's, but the national assembly voted not to go any further. Similar story in Finland.

  13. It's All About CONTROL! by mrpacmanjel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Governments *hate* the idea of people having too much freedom.

    Why?
    It means you'll start asking too many questions and governments don't like that!

    It also means you become difficult to control.

    How?
    By keeping you fearful - global warming, recession, terrorism, nuclear arms and now the freedom of the Internet (terrorists and paedophiles use it)
    These subjects in themselves are genuine concerns but governments have a knack of focusing on them and using them to conrol the general population. Usually by using extreme measures via law and policy legislation.

    Web censorship is no different. Governments need us to be passive and compliant. Fortunately free speech is *impossible* to control it's part of who you are. You can censor or prohibit the *mechanisms* that express free speech but never "control" it.

    Suppose Italy do censor the Internet and other countries follow. Do you really think that will be the end of it?

    I don't think so.

    If they start blocking web sites (probably at ISP level) then people will turn to encryption and deliver content that way. If encrypting the web becomes illegal then some other mechanism will manifest itself (e.g. bypassing the ISP entirely).

    I hate to say this, but some form of government control is coming to the Internet whether you like it or not.

    So, be prepared.

    1. Re:It's All About CONTROL! by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Freedom is not for you is you are not someone. That's it.

      --
      Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
      For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    2. Re:It's All About CONTROL! by supernova_hq · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Are you a completely moron, a troll or did I just get whooshed? Nobody owns the internet. Some people may own "pieces" of the internet, but nobody owns the Internet.

  14. Who are italians by emanem · · Score: 1

    Italians can be identified by these two songs:
    Articolo 31 - Domani smetto
    Articolo 31 - Italiano medio
    You'll be perfectly able to understand what's going on if you listen to these songs...to bad I can't find a pre-made English translation..
    Cheers,

    Ps. I'm Italian

    1. Re:Who are italians by Katchu · · Score: 1

      Article 31 - Tomorrow I'll stop Article 31 - the average Italian

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
    2. Re:Who are italians by emanem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'll translate the (most significant parts of) second one that is more insightful:
      Average Italian
      ...I remember old habits, social satire, today I'm trying to find Luttazzi (a satire comedian who has been censored by Berlusconi) on TV but can't
      Anyway, I'm the good average italian citizen, I've updated my mobile ringtones, I drink a glass of wine with a panino and I'm happy if Costanzo (a showman) pretends to be funny in his show
      I got an holy picture in the living room, I pray it just so I can win the lotto ... that will make me millionaire like Silvio (Berlusconi) with Paolo's (Berlusconi - his borther) newspaper and his controlled TV news (I had to render it like this because in Italian is said as a joke with names)
      This year I've been poor but for two weeks I've pretended to be rich at Porto Cervo (one of the most posh area of Sardinia, where Gates & co. go every summer)
      ...
      I don't care a lot about anything these days, I go to the shopping mall and my issue is where to park my car
      But you know what? I don't care a lot because I'm Italian and I sing! Just give me TV shows...

      Well I hope this gives you an idea about Italy and the average italian...

      Sadly,

  15. Fans by TimeElf1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Italian government has proposed introducing new restrictions on the Internet after a Facebook fan page for the man who allegedly attacked Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Sunday drew almost 100,000 users in under 48 hours.

    Well that is a rather knee jerk reaction, last I checked Facebook was not for just people from Italy. Besides people will become fans of anything on Facebook, from beer, to Jeffrey Dahmer.

    --
    Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.
  16. Good on you, Italy by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Good on you, Italy. At least you are being honest about why you would want to censor the net. None of the usual "terrorist pedophile" nonsense. Just a nice, simple message to the populous: "we don't want to hear from you, please go away".

    However, since I am against censorship, I might have to reconsider the answer to my Simpson quote regarding asteroid targets from earlier today.

  17. That's already in place. by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Italy you are not allowed to reach some international websites, mainly related to betting.
    You get directed to a generic web page (hosted at the government company SOGEI Spa) that says that you are not allowed to visit those websites.
    If you are in Italy you can try http://www.ladbrokes.com/ or http://www.skybet.com/.
    Can you spell "freedom" in Italian? We cannot.

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:That's already in place. by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      A corrupt mafia-run government wants to outlaw gambling? Well, duh, BIG SURPRISE.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    2. Re:That's already in place. by hamvil · · Score: 0

      I could access both the websites from Italy. I tried both from work and from home (using my VPN). So sir your are wrong.

    3. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just change your DNS servers and make them point to OpenDNS or another service like it, you jerk.

      Unlicensed gambling sites are blacklisted only for tax purposes, freedom is quite a different thing. Just try to run an unlicensed gambling outfit in any country, then come back and tell me that not being able to reach Ladbrokes site is proof of Berlusconi dictatorship.
      You moron.

    4. Re:That's already in place. by I'm_Original · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am in Italy right now, and I didn't know there was any censorship. I tried those two sites, and you're right, they are in fact censored, with a notice referencing the law that brought the censorship into place. Thank you.

    5. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the reality, then!

    6. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Italy and they are working. Either they are blocked only through DNS, or their geolocation sucks.

    7. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely it's a DNS thing on ISP level, popular in EU to quickly censor sites. Easily bypassed with your own or a public DNS Server. until they figure out they could redirect port 53...

    8. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Italy, in Milan, and I've absolutely no problem to visit both the websites... maybe it depends on the ISP?

    9. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I am in Italy, connected thru 'Alice Telecom' that is one of the largest ISP, and I can connect to those two sites

    10. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ex sysadmin for ladbrokes.... can i point out you can go to http://www.ladbrokes.it

      We went through f**king loads of hoops to get the local site there!

      As far as i'm aware it is not being blocked by itally, ladbrokes do a geo ip lookup via quova and block you.

      Just my 2c

    11. Re:That's already in place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're mere DNS redirects...

  18. Godwin bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if a German polititian was attacked, a new censorship reigime in place, guess what happens next.

  19. Berlusconi already in control - of Slashdot? by paiute · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at the facts. If this had been an incident in France, we would have two dozen posts with surrender jokes already. But here we have an Italian story and not one submarine screen door, bottom of the ocean, five reverse gears, pulling the pins and throwing them back reference. Someone has to be preventing this.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Berlusconi already in control - of Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?!? I'm italian but didn't get a single one of these jokes (big woooosh, I know).

  20. Internet Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Censors-hip becomes trendy. It is time to tell governments who is whos employer.

  21. Partial U turn? by Nomaxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    "leading Interior Minister Roberto Maroni to execute a partial U-turn." What's a partial U-turn? ...a L-turn?

    1. Re:Partial U turn? by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or a J turm

  22. It just shows you by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    It just shows you why a constitution is a good idea. The best time to make a cool decision about freedom of speech and censorship is probably not while you are nursing wounds after being attacked, but a change made now would be difficult to get reveresed in the furure. The same could happen in the UK, where I live - one event could lead to hasty loss of liberty. Oh, wait it already has.

    1. Re:It just shows you by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Only if they pay attention to it. :|

  23. The train of thought by Balau · · Score: 3, Informative

    It goes on like this:
    -Berlusconi was attacked by Mr.Tartaglia because he hated him.
    -The attack was caused by the hateful mood (http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/politica/2009/12/15/visualizza_new.html_1646244271.html/)
    -Facebook is full of political hatred (http://www.ilgiornale.it/interni/su_facebook_tartaglia_eroe_chi_odia/tartaglia-facebook-berlusconi/13-12-2009/articolo-id=406674-page=0-comments=1/)
    -Facebook is on the Internet
    -The solution is to control Facebook, and also the whole Internet to avoid mistakes (http://www.repubblica.it/2009/12/sezioni/politica/giustizia-22/rodota/rodota.html/)

    --
    Working to work less.
  24. Berlusconi Dangerously? by Shoten · · Score: 1

    After seeing the words "Minister Robert Maroni," all I can picture in my mind is a man with dark eyebrows seeing the Facebook page and then ranting about "iceholes" and "fargin' bastiges."

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Berlusconi Dangerously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can be even worse: he may try to bite your ankle like he did try with a public officer some years ago :)

  25. Re:welcome censorship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, the censorship porposed will NOT be used to close groups on facebook, or facebook itself. In fact, facebook removed the groups, as it is already an offence to hype a crime in Italy. This is just a way to get support from people full of knowledge like you.

  26. Pretty Arrogant by Milican · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's too bad, but people get attacked all the time. However, when a leader gets attacked then we need to shut down the Internet. Pretty arrogant and self-centered. I'm glad the Internet is pretty free, but it's only a matter of time until politicians invent an excuse to control it. I'm sure it will be for the children, or to stop some possible terrorist scenario. Then it'll creep out from there.

    JOhn

  27. Wrong title by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It should have read:

    AFTER BERLUCONI ATTACK, ITALIAN GOVERNMENT SHOWS HIS PLANS FOR CENSORSHIP.

    Anyone with info about how Berlusconi deals with the basis of democracy (independent news, respect to the Constitution, independent judges) would have expected these plans to be in the works. The attack gives them an opportunity to show them.

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    1. Re:Wrong title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But at least the trains will run on time.

  28. true free speech is rare in the world by peter303 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    America gets critized for a lot of things, many justifiably. But its so-called Bill of Rights is mroe firmly followed than in most other countries, inlcuding "liberal Europe". Cults like Scientology and Mormonism are banend in parts of Europe. "Pre-trial publicity" and "reasonable doubt" are not as entrenched in other places liek the during the recent Italian trial of the the Seattle woman.

  29. Don't forget the "Italian Crackdown" in 1992. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't forget the "Italian Crackdown" in 1992.

    To fight against crime, police busted all italian fidonet BBS.
    122 arrest and 159 BBS confiscated.

    Ref: http://www.altx.com/interzones2/italy/crackdown.html

    Regard,
    Dan

  30. google translate tells me liberta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you spell "freedom" in Italian? We cannot.

    liberta

  31. They've got it all wrong! by dsouza42 · · Score: 1