Slashdot Mirror


EU Demands Canada Rework Its Copyright, Patent Law

An anonymous reader writes "The draft intellectual property text of the EU - Canada Trade Agreement has leaked, with news that the EU is demanding that Canada fundamentally alter copyright, patent, and trademark law. The laundry list of demands includes copyright term extension, WIPO ratification, DMCA-style legislation, resale rights, new enforcement provisions, and following patent, trademark, and design law treaties. The net result is that when combined with the ACTA requirements, Canadian copyright law may cease to be Canadian." Reader TheTurtlesMoves stresses the "first sale doctrine" aspect of the Canada - EU negotiations. Once an artist sells a creative work, should she get a cut of any future resales of that same work? The EU says yes at least for some types of works, and it wants Canada to see things its way. "Europe's Directive 2001/84/EC says that the right covers only 'works of graphic or plastic art such as pictures, collages, paintings, drawings, engravings, prints, lithographs, sculptures, tapestries, ceramics, glassware and photographs, provided they are made by the artist himself or are copies considered to be original works of art.'"

9 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Cue the apologists... by HarrySquatter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Aren't we constantly told that the EU is so much better in regards to patents and copyrights and it's only the big bad US that is constantly trying to push all this stuff on people?

  2. Just as a Matter of Principal by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just as a matter of principal, Canada should give them a nice hearty "F**k you, eh!"
     

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  3. As a Canadian... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you. Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.

    1. Re:As a Canadian... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason it would have been modded down if it were by an American is that the American Government is over there mucking about in other people's Countries before getting its house in order, making the statement completely hypocritical.

      Canadians on the other hand, do very little besides peacekeeping, and combing the hills of Afghanistan.

  4. Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO: by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it "might" be used to pirate?

    I actually like this system, because it gives me implied governmental approval to copy as I see fit.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  5. Disgusting... by Synchis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This type of news is disgusting to me as a Canadian.

    Throughout the summer, Canada held an enormous copyright consultation in which large corporations expressed an interest in these types of changes, and artists, creators and citizens expressed an interest in the exact opposite direction to this.

    Michael Geist usually carries all the latest news about this topic.

    At the same time, I think we have nothing to worry about. In a country that shows a 30% voter turnout (at best), that makes 6.9 million voters. Historically, over 500000 canadians joined the protest against the last attempt to bring laws like this. Thats a 7% swing in the vote towards the party that will stand up against this type of law making. Thats enough to win an election in Canada.

    With all this hype over copyright and trademark law, I expect it to be a hot topic in the next election, and with us running under a minority gov't, we could end up with an election at any time.

    --
    Thomas A. Knight
    Author of The Time Weaver
  6. Canadians speak up! by ubergeek65536 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are as pissed off about other countries trying to write our laws write your MP and the following Ministers.

    Tony Clement
    Minister of Industry
    http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ic1.nsf/eng/00093.html
    minister.industry@ic.gc.ca

    Bev Oda
    Minister of International Cooperation
    http://www.bevoda.ca/
    Oda.B@parl.gc.ca

  7. What a load of crap by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is not what international law is at all. International law is the stuff that happens in The Hague and it has been around a long time and is desperately needed. It governs such silly every day things as trade. If you trade between countries (between sets of laws) which one goes? Well, that is what international law is for.

    And it is in Holland because Holland was ONCE a world-power (yes really) but lost that status but still had a need to maintain its trading empire. So while the british and other powers settled trade disputes with the law of the biggest gun(boat) Holland needed something more.

    International law is an entirely different beast then this, what we are talking about here are treaties. It may look the same, but it is fundementally different.

    In fact, the current system is so wrong because it seeks to bypass laws altogether. The media companies are waging a very complex war against basic law by trying to get a new set of laws introduced by means that were never intended. Trade treaties were supposed to be "We sell you X and you don't charge for it and we allow you sell us Y without charging tariffs on it". Not "you will subject your citizens to our laws".

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  8. This is a real threat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forget about the small ragtag bands of Middle Eastern terrorists. They aren't a real threat to freedom and democracy.

    Legislation like this, pushed by supranational organizations, is. It is a far, far bigger threat to everybody's freedom and the democracy of Western nations than any terrorist organization.