Slashdot Mirror


Consumerist Says AT&T Site Won't Sell iPhone In NYC, Citing Network

cowp writes "A Consumerist tipster couldn't get AT&T's website to sell him an iPhone when he shopped using an NYC ZIP code, but could when he tried other cities' ZIPs. Consumerist asked an AT&T CSR and seems to have gotten confirmation that this is carrier policy: 'Yes, this is correct the phone is not offered to you because New York is not ready for the iPhone. You don't have enough towers to handle the phone.' Considering Apple's gadget is currently the most popular handset in the US, its exclusive carrier's inability/unwillingness to support the device in the country's largest market is pretty huge news. If this proves true, I'd expect curtains for AT&T's exclusivity deal when it comes up for renewal." If you're in NYC, can you confirm or deny this outlandish-sounding claim? Updated 20091227 1:03 GMT by timothy: Headline, now corrected, inaccurately named Apple rather than AT&T. Mea culpa.

42 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. This has been an issue for quite awhile. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's been a lot of coverage indicating problems with iPhones in New York, including one Gizmodo piece saying a 30% dropped call rate is apparently normal.

    1. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by dov_0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      I didn't see any mention of Japan in TFA?

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    3. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back in 2004, I quit my job and went on a roadtrip on steroids. I drove from Mexico to Alaska, down to Texas, up to the Dakotas, and finally back home to Massachusetts. I was an AT&T wireless customer and I was stunned at the lack of coverage. I could only talk near major cities if I were lucky. Even then, calls were being dropped every other call. Their coverage charts were such BS. I quit my service once I got home, and switched to another provider, experiencing only minor irritations on subsequent road trips.

    4. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by jonoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      The same South Korea that took over two years to get the iPhone. And the same SK that still blocks any non-Korean approved unlocked phone from being used on their networks without paying a $300 "inspection" fee? And the same SK where the majority of domestic websites require Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6) to function correctly?

      For those of you who don't know, South Korea is not a technological paradise. We have fast broadband but that's about it.

    5. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many Americans seem to think their country is the best and most advanced in the world. They are brainwashed by the mass media's propaganda.

    6. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by mister_playboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in 2004, I quit my job and went on a roadtrip on steroids.

      ... because you wanted to have the opportunity to road rage and 'roid rage simultaneously?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    7. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, you should also show them your travel permit, and remember to be nice and polite as you pass through the checkpoints.

    8. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bullshit.

      I called Wells Fargo before my last cross-country trip - They immediately locked me from $2,000 daily limit to $200, I got stranded because I filled up for gas and then had not enough left for the rest of the day to cover my hotel expenses - I had to sleep in my car in the freezing cold in a fucking parking lot.

      And when they said they raised it back up - they lied. They cut it down to $150.

      Of course, as soon as I got back, I withdrew all of my money and made a very loud statement in the lobby to all of the customers present. I think two followed my suit.

      You tell them you're going around the country, they'll lock your shit down so you don't make THEM off-balance. They're the ones playing dirty with your money. What, you ain't seen the bailout?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      You forgot the sarcasm tag I'm hoping. The US is not the most technologically advanced country in North America let alone the planet. While AT&T was slowly rolling out 7.2, your neighbours to the North were rolling out 21Mbps HSDPA on the incumbent GSM carrier. While Verizon was busy coming up with clever ads to attack AT&T, Canadian CDMA carriers were getting ready to launch a coast to coast 21 Mbps HSDPA network and launch the iPhone 3GS on their network making the iPhone non-exclusive in Canada. A lot of technology that you take for granted every day was invented in Canada. The robotic arm used to construct the international space station was from Canada.

      BTW. How is that LTE thing going for Verizon? Will we see come out before 2020?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF? Seriously? Why do Canadians always bring up that arm as if it is the greatest piece of technology ever invented when it is sitting next to a $10 billion Orbiter and a $100 billion space station, which are some of the greatest marvels of technology ever invented?

      People really are dipshits with this "my country is more advanced than yours" idiocy. Advances in technology can only be compared with time, not locations. The rate of development of technology in the US is extremely high--but this doesn't mean that the technology is deployed there. Is a country like Japan more advanced than the US because it builds more hardware and software or is the US more advanced because it designs more? Or should we compare per capita?

      I think it is a foolish thing to even worry about. Only nationalists would really care. I care about the technology, not who is the most 'advanced'.

      The blue diode, the microprocessor, scramjets, the LHC--those are important. I don't give a shit which country gets the nationalistic props for being the most technologically advanced.

    11. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, the South Korea that wanted strong (128-bit) encryption back when IE was the only browser worth mentioning, but 128-bit encryption couldn't be exported. They implemented their own encryption scheme as an ActiveX pugin, and open source browsers have been really slow about implementing a compatible form of that encryption system.

      To me, that sounds like a country that was quite tech savvy, but got screwed by US politics.

    12. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How far they have fallen. I used to be die hard AT&T. Between 93-98 I had an old Nokia TDMA cell phone with a freaking brick on the back for a battery.

      My talk time was like 3-4 fucking days. I forgot my charger one time on a trip and it lasted on standby and just a little bit of talking two weeks. I shit you not.

      I was once out on a camping trip in the middle of nowhere (probably 20 miles away from the interstate) and I was the only person with a cell signal. Made calls and everything. People were dumbfounded that I was on my cell phone considering how far away I was.

      2009.......

      I am ready to strangle people with iPhones on AT&T. It is such a joke. From Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Houston, and New York, I talk to people with crappy sound, disconnects within about 3-4 minutes (90% of the time), and pure constant frustration trying to communicate with these people.

      They still love the iPhone though.

      What I have learned is two things.

      1) How far you can fall in terms of customer satisfaction and real world coverage and performance. (Not flaming here, these are my direct observations).
      2) How much shit people will put up with for a shiny iPhone.

      P.S - The iPhone does not look that bad. Jailbroken and on TMobile or Verizon (hopefully soon because CDMA will finally be available) it might be pretty nice to work with.

    13. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rate of development of technology in the US is extremely high--but this doesn't mean that the technology is deployed there.

      Therefore the country where it IS deployed is the more advanced. When I moved to the US from Europe I was amazed at how technologically backwards the place was considering the huge amount of tech development that goes on there. The amount and type of technology you encounter in everyday life is certainly far behind Europe and now living in Canada things are more advanced, but still not quite as much as Europe. Its true that some of the newest gadgets may get released in the US first but when it comes to applying technology to existing products (like the car) the US is surprisingly far behind.

    14. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by ihavnoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The same South Korea that took over two years to get the iPhone. And the same SK that still blocks any non-Korean approved unlocked phone from being used on their networks without paying a $300 "inspection" fee? And the same SK where the majority of domestic websites require Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6) to function correctly?

      For those of you who don't know, South Korea is not a technological paradise. We have fast broadband but that's about it.

      To be fair, the $300 inspection fee is for getting *any* device certified by the FCC-equivalent authority of Korea *for personal use*. To make sure that the device does't interfere with the government-authorized spectrum. You should blame (insert company name) for not doing the job for you, not the South Korean government. Hell, what kind of government authorize using non-certified devices in their soverign?

      Additionally, I use IE8 and firefox, and I had zero hiccups using IE8, and nearly zero problem using Firefox except on-line gaming sites (which merely is a Windows game installer) and banks (which require so many addons). Everything else is fine.

  2. Spin by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we stop saying things like 'the most popular handset?' When we're talking about a market where no single handset has more than about 1-2% market share, saying 'the most popular' is entirely meaningless.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Spin by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody outside of the tech world knows what an iPhone is.

      Not everybody outside of the tech world knows what the E55, Hero, or GW620 are.

    2. Re:Spin by XPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everybody outside of the tech world knows what an iPhone is.

      Not everybody outside of the tech world knows what the E55, Hero, or GW620 are.

      True, but promisingly I've been seeing a lot of my non-tech friends carrying around new Android devices lately.

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Spin by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

      People are wising up though. The Droid's marketing campaign just hasn't gotten people into VZW's doors, it has spurred interest in Android devices in general. I've talked with people who see the Droid, find it interesting, but prefer T-Mobile, and end up coming out with a Samsung Behold, a Motorola Cliq, or a MyTouch 3G. People on Sprint find that the Samsung Moment offers one of the fastest processors. The only carrier that has no current offering is AT&T, but supposedly they will be offering a Dell Android phone. AT&T also has the iPhone, so just business common sense says that Android devices will be second fiddle to AT&T's mainstay.

    4. Re:Spin by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It says "iPhone 3G," one specific model of the iPhone. The other phones and their models, however, are grouped together. See the parenthesis?

  3. No problems last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in NYC under a 114xx zip code and had no problems buying one in person at an ATT store. I bought it the weekend after Thanksgiving so it was about a month ago. Maybe they changed it since then.

  4. Fix the headline? by Shag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Summary makes it clear it's AT&T that isn't selling the iPhone in New York City. Headline says it's Apple, who last time I checked have iPhones for sale in their New York City stores. :)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Fix the headline? by zentechno · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.att.com/ --> Wireless --> Shop/Cell Phones --> PDAs and Smartphones --> iPhone 3G. Opening the (last) iPhone link in another tab prompts me for my zip, followed by "not available in your area", *then* refreshing the list of phones in the previous tab *removes* iPhone from the listing.

      --
      âoeThe wall between art and engineering exists only in our minds.â -- Theo Jansen
  5. Re:Most popular handset is false. by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope. It's the most popular phone in the US based on units sold. 4% of the market.

    That's almost 10% better than the best BB. 75% better than the entire RAZR V3 line.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  6. Re:I'm a little confused here... by iamapizza · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly, this is a devastating experience for aforementioned individual, as they are unable to procure an iphone. In fact, there is a potential that an entire city may be denied the presence of the iphone. Here at slashdot, we feel their pain.

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
  7. Cellular Nazi says: by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

    No iPhone for You!

  8. Re:AT&T's service is crap by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, here in rural Alaska we get at least 20% dropped iPhone calls. After a particularly annoying one (I was within 200 yards of the tower, line of sight, over water) I complained to the local AT&T rep and the FCC.

    About 2 weeks later, I got this nice call from an AT&T droid who says he was asked by the FCC to look into this. After a few pleasantries, he suggested 1) Making sure the battery was charged (OK), 2) Turning off 3G (already done, don't have 3G here in the boonies) and getting closer to the tower. I explained that if I got any closer to the tower on the last dropped call, I'd have to marry it.

    His final suggestion was to take it up with Apple, maybe I needed a new handset.

    I suppose it's something of a start but AT&T isn't going to solve very much of the problem this way.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  9. This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not because it's the best phone available, which it might or might not be depending on who you ask, but because there's a guy in Cupertino with a black turtleneck, a borrowed liver, and a really shitty attitude who owns the exact same phone I do, and who has the power to make it suck less.

    Even if he has to stare down AT&T to do it.

    What other phone manufacturer can go to bat for their customers like that?

    1. Re:This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful
  10. Don't bash AT&T by astrashe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is responsible -- they don't have enough towers, and they shouldn't be selling any more phones until they build more capacity.

    It's not any different than not selling additional seats on an airplane that's already full. No one would blame an airline for not overbooking. I don't think we should blame AT&T for doing the right thing.

    As a New Yorker with an iPhone, I hope Apple follows suit and stops selling iPhones to New Yorkers until the network is robust enough to provide decent service.

    Failing that, I think they should waive early termination fees for NYC users.

    1. Re:Don't bash AT&T by astrashe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The phone is surprisingly popular, and no one has a crystal ball.

      For most products, there's some sort of limit on how much you can sell, that's connected to how many of them you make.

      Southwest can only fly so many people to a certain destination, a bakery can only sell so many cupcakes, a barber can only take so many appointments, a restaurant only has so many tables, etc.

      Sometimes popular products and services sell out -- it's a very common situation in business.

      There is a limit on the number of iPhones the AT&T network can support. The exact number is fuzzy, but there's no doubt that they've gone beyond it here in NYC. They should just say that they're sold out until they grow the network.

      Again, it's not any different than a restaurant declining to take a reservation because they're full. Respectable businesses do this all the time. It's perfectly reasonable.

  11. Re:AT&T's service is crap by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "His final suggestion was to take it up with Apple, maybe I needed a new handset."

    Go back to the FCC and resubmit your complaint. Obviously AT&T simply read you the script to meet the barest of "compliance" requirements...by sending you to some script reader in a call center. They won't do jack shit until the FCC requires them to. Or, you're able to find someone within the local ranks at ATT that are willing to listen to you, not just some corporate weenie.

  12. Re:AT&T's service is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually you may have been too close. I am far from a wireless engineer but I do know that depending on the antennas used the base of a tower can be a dead zone. I've seen this in the wireless ISP world a few times and its frustrating.

  13. Re:False by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you happen to try buying it online from the AT&T store? Because you would not have been able to. They aren't selling it.

    The title was wrong, but the summary and story are both correct. It's getting bad if people can't even bother to read the whole summary.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  14. Re:AT&T's service is crap by rec9140 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "AT&T's service is crap"

    correct.

    BUT...

    You could be standing under the tower and your phone not work.

    Its called site geometry you actually could have a dead spot in certain areas that are very close to the tower and even in plain sight, including directly at the site.

    Just because you see one tower, its not ONE cell site. Depending on the location and the needs for that are it could be upto 6 sites depending on the sectorization used at that location. Most are 3 at a minimum, 120 degree sectorization. As you move into the urban area, and to meet other coverage needs it can go down to about 60 degrees.

    this applies to all RADIO systems, which cell phones are nothing more than radio systems.

    --
    1311393600 - Back to Black
  15. A Few Good Men by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe that CSR just watched A Few Good Men.

    AT&T: You want coverage?
    Consumerist: I think I have the towers.
    AT&T: You want coverage?
    Consumerist: I want the iPhone!
    AT&T: You can't handle the iPhone!!

  16. Re:I live in NYC by RobVB · · Score: 3, Funny

    Weird indeed. I've been to Manhattan, and there are lots of towers.

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  17. It's about fraud prevention by BearRanger · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not all AT&T phone reps are equally versed in what's going on, as Consumerist later admits on their site. AT&T will sell you the iPhone in their stores throughout NYC. They won't sell you the phone online within NYC. Apparently this is because of fraudulent resales as people order the phones online, take delivery and then ship them overseas. Skipping out on the contracts in the process, as they never intended to honor them in the first place.

    I wonder why NYC has more of a problem with this than other locations. Large transient international population I suppose...

  18. Re:I'm a little confused here... by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's like a ghost town compared to a few Asian cities. Light traffic, hardly any people, clear air, you could almost eat off the concrete. :-)

    I live in Manila, we have 10,500 people per square kilometer across the metro on average, though some of the slum areas are as high as 40k - and yes, they all have cell phones - we send 140 billion text messages a year, the entire country is bathed in 3.5G, surprisingly you can actually get the juicy speed goodness anywhere at any time too, so the telco drones must be doing something right.

  19. Re:iPhone vs everything else by Mister+Xiado · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd say a good 97% of all dropped call complaints on AT&T come from iPhone users. Not that I keep score, but every time I hear "customer is getting poor signal, dropped calls", I immediately think "another damn iPhone call". I'd assume unlocked iPhones work well, because odds are, they're not connected to UMTS towers much of the time. It's the phone. It's been trash since day zero, when Apple didn't supply AT&T with any documentation on the original iPhone until five minutes before launch, making for a lot of fun for everybody trying to activate the hockey pucks. Did you know that all the Visual Voicemail breakdown crap this past summer was from Apple pooping out repeated failed updates, jamming up iPhones that hadn't even been updated? Check Settings, General. If you have "Profile" listed there, surprise! Delete the corrupted AT&T profile and watch your messages roll in after two minutes. Also, anybody who knows how cell phones work knows better than to expect uninterrupted calls while driving. You're playing tarzan between towers. There isn't always a long vine in reach. Unless you're doing 120.

  20. Insightful? You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Says the man who repeats the mantra of the liberal, pinning all their problems on some abstract idea of a colaborative and archetypal villain named "the mass media". There is no collaboration amongst them, they are not trying to brainwash you, or anyone else, instead they are trying to appeal to you, to watch them. In this way, they are a reflection of you. When you understand that there are no super villain's, nobody cares about you, and it's extremely hard to organize a group to do ANYTHING in even the best of situations, then you will come to the realization that these abstract concepts you create to define your super smart group compared to the other super stupid group, are extremely arbitrary and do not reflect reality in the least bit.

    I think you'll find "many" citizens think their country is the best and most advanced in the world, given you don't come from an third world country. This is called patriotism, it's not particularly good, however suggesting that some out group ("Americans") are somehow worse than your ingroup, means you're doing the exact same thing.

    Basically, what I'm saying is, you're an idiot, and are displaying the very biases and failures in logic that you're so pissed off at in others.